Fresh Mesa 11.3-dev Tests vs. NVIDIA Linux

UbuTom06

Compare your own system(s) to this result file with the Phoronix Test Suite by running the command: phoronix-test-suite benchmark 1605063-GA-1604287HA50
Jump To Table - Results

View

Do Not Show Noisy Results
Do Not Show Results With Incomplete Data
Do Not Show Results With Little Change/Spread
List Notable Results

Statistics

Show Overall Harmonic Mean(s)
Show Overall Geometric Mean
Show Wins / Losses Counts (Pie Chart)
Normalize Results
Remove Outliers Before Calculating Averages

Graph Settings

Force Line Graphs Where Applicable
Convert To Scalar Where Applicable
Disable Color Branding
Prefer Vertical Bar Graphs

Additional Graphs

Show Perf Per Core/Thread Calculation Graphs Where Applicable
Show Perf Per Clock Calculation Graphs Where Applicable

Multi-Way Comparison

Condense Multi-Option Tests Into Single Result Graphs

Table

Show Detailed System Result Table

Run Management

Highlight
Result
Hide
Result
Result
Identifier
View Logs
Performance Per
Dollar
Date
Run
  Test
  Duration
GeForce GTX 680
April 27 2016
 
GeForce GTX 780 Ti
April 27 2016
 
GeForce GTX 960
April 27 2016
 
GeForce GTX 970
April 27 2016
 
GeForce GTX 980 Ti
April 27 2016
 
Radeon R7 370
April 27 2016
 
Radeon R9 285
April 28 2016
 
Radeon R9 290
April 27 2016
 
Radeon R9 Fury
April 27 2016
 
UbuTom06
May 06 2016
 
Invert Hiding All Results Option
 

Only show results where is faster than
Only show results matching title/arguments (delimit multiple options with a comma):
Do not show results matching title/arguments (delimit multiple options with a comma):


Fresh Mesa 11.3-dev Tests vs. NVIDIA LinuxProcessorMotherboardChipsetMemoryDiskGraphicsAudioMonitorNetworkOSKernelDesktopDisplay ServerOpenGLOpenCLCompilerFile-SystemScreen ResolutionDisplay DriverVulkanRadeon R9 290Radeon R7 370GeForce GTX 960GeForce GTX 980 TiGeForce GTX 970GeForce GTX 780 TiGeForce GTX 680Radeon R9 FuryRadeon R9 285UbuTom06Intel Xeon E3-1280 v5 @ 4.00GHz (8 Cores)MSI C236A WORKSTATION (MS-7998) v1.0Intel Sky Lake16384MB120GB Samsung SSD 850XFX AMD Radeon R9 290 4096MBRealtek ALC1150DELL P2415QIntel ConnectionUbuntu 16.044.4.0-21-generic (x86_64)Unity 7.4.0X Server 1.18.34.2 Mesa 11.3.0-devel (padoka PPA) Gallium 0.4OpenCL 1.1 MESA 11.3.0-devel (padoka PPA)GCC 5.3.1 20160413ext43840x2160MSI AMD Radeon R7 370 / R9 270/370 OEM 4096MBeVGA NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 2048MB (1202/3304MHz)NVIDIA 364.194.5.0OpenCL 1.2 CUDA 8.0.0 + OpenCL 1.1 MESA 11.3.0-devel (padoka PPA)1.0.8NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 Ti 6144MB (999/3505MHz)eVGA NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970 4096MB (1163/3505MHz)NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 Ti 3072MB (875/3500MHz)NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680 2048MB (1006/3004MHz)Sapphire AMD Radeon R9 FURY / NANO 4096MBDELL P2415Q4.2 Mesa 11.3.0-devel (padoka PPA) Gallium 0.4OpenCL 1.1 MESA 11.3.0-devel (padoka PPA)XFX AMD Radeon R9 285/380 2048MBIntel Core i5-2500K @ 3.70GHz (4 Cores)Gigabyte Z68AP-D3Intel 2nd Generation Core Family DRAM500GB Samsung SSD 850 + 250GB Samsung SSD 850MSI AMD Radeon R9 290 8192MBRealtek ALC889VX2260WMRealtek RTL8111/8168/8411MATE 1.12.1modesetting 1.18.31920x1080OpenBenchmarking.orgProcessor Details- Radeon R9 290: Scaling Governor: intel_pstate performance- Radeon R7 370: Scaling Governor: intel_pstate performance- GeForce GTX 960: Scaling Governor: intel_pstate performance- GeForce GTX 980 Ti: Scaling Governor: intel_pstate performance- GeForce GTX 970: Scaling Governor: intel_pstate performance- GeForce GTX 780 Ti: Scaling Governor: intel_pstate performance- GeForce GTX 680: Scaling Governor: intel_pstate performance- Radeon R9 Fury: Scaling Governor: intel_pstate performance- Radeon R9 285: Scaling Governor: intel_pstate performance- UbuTom06: Scaling Governor: intel_pstate powersaveGraphics Details- Radeon R9 290, Radeon R7 370, Radeon R9 Fury, Radeon R9 285, UbuTom06: GLAMOR

Radeon R9 290Radeon R7 370GeForce GTX 960GeForce GTX 980 TiGeForce GTX 970GeForce GTX 780 TiGeForce GTX 680Radeon R9 FuryRadeon R9 285UbuTom06Result OverviewPhoronix Test Suite100%244%388%533%677%GpuTestTesseractUnigine ValleyXonoticXonoticXonoticFurmark - 1920 x 1080 - Fullscreen3840 x 21601920 x 1080 - Fullscreen3840 x 2160 - Ultimate3840 x 2160 - Ultra3840 x 2160 - High

Fresh Mesa 11.3-dev Tests vs. NVIDIA Linuxbioshock-infinite: 3840 x 2160 - Ultratesseract: 3840 x 2160xonotic: 3840 x 2160 - Highxonotic: 3840 x 2160 - Ultraxonotic: 3840 x 2160 - Ultimateunigine-valley: 1920 x 1080 - Fullscreengputest: Furmark - 1920 x 1080 - FullscreenRadeon R9 290Radeon R7 370GeForce GTX 960GeForce GTX 980 TiGeForce GTX 970GeForce GTX 780 TiGeForce GTX 680Radeon R9 FuryRadeon R9 285UbuTom0642.48107.53211.81172.75131.9364.19171639.1470.21145.37111.4780.6434.981057104.08155.23102.5870.4054.121067220.63325.74237.20164.84107.992624170.39268.98186.47128.6589.381758176.70312.74239.49170.0192.282022113.16213.60156.25110.7964.82128155.82155.04236.89195.46149.8878.63308741.1061.72171.26134.52101.0846.351399188.07175.47152.57127.0767.357153OpenBenchmarking.org

BioShock Infinite

A Steam-based test of the BioShock Infinite game. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterBioShock InfiniteResolution: 3840 x 2160 - Effects Quality: UltraRadeon R9 290Radeon R7 370Radeon R9 FuryRadeon R9 2851326395265SE +/- 0.12, N = 3SE +/- 0.03, N = 3SE +/- 0.39, N = 3SE +/- 0.02, N = 342.4839.1455.8241.10MIN: 7.27 / MAX: 81.93MIN: 9.36 / MAX: 81.83MIN: 9.71 / MAX: 81.68MIN: 8.73 / MAX: 82.07
OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterBioShock InfiniteResolution: 3840 x 2160 - Effects Quality: UltraRadeon R9 290Radeon R7 370Radeon R9 FuryRadeon R9 2851122334455Min: 42.24 / Avg: 42.48 / Max: 42.6Min: 39.09 / Avg: 39.14 / Max: 39.2Min: 55.31 / Avg: 55.82 / Max: 56.58Min: 41.07 / Avg: 41.1 / Max: 41.12

Tesseract

Tesseract is a fork of Cube 2 Sauerbraten with numerous graphics and game-play improvements. Tesseract has been in development since 2012 while its first release happened in May of 2014. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterTesseract 2014-05-12Resolution: 3840 x 2160Radeon R9 290Radeon R7 370GeForce GTX 960GeForce GTX 980 TiGeForce GTX 970GeForce GTX 780 TiGeForce GTX 680Radeon R9 FuryRadeon R9 285UbuTom0650100150200250SE +/- 1.00, N = 3SE +/- 0.36, N = 3SE +/- 0.33, N = 3SE +/- 3.32, N = 3SE +/- 0.58, N = 3SE +/- 0.97, N = 3SE +/- 0.24, N = 3SE +/- 2.13, N = 3SE +/- 0.63, N = 3SE +/- 1.65, N = 3107.5370.21104.08220.63170.39176.70113.16155.0461.72188.07
OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterTesseract 2014-05-12Resolution: 3840 x 2160Radeon R9 290Radeon R7 370GeForce GTX 960GeForce GTX 980 TiGeForce GTX 970GeForce GTX 780 TiGeForce GTX 680Radeon R9 FuryRadeon R9 285UbuTom064080120160200Min: 105.99 / Avg: 107.53 / Max: 109.4Min: 69.81 / Avg: 70.21 / Max: 70.94Min: 103.5 / Avg: 104.08 / Max: 104.62Min: 214.21 / Avg: 220.63 / Max: 225.33Min: 169.54 / Avg: 170.39 / Max: 171.5Min: 175.43 / Avg: 176.7 / Max: 178.61Min: 112.82 / Avg: 113.16 / Max: 113.63Min: 151.82 / Avg: 155.04 / Max: 159.07Min: 60.47 / Avg: 61.72 / Max: 62.48Min: 184.78 / Avg: 188.07 / Max: 189.82

Xonotic

This is a benchmark of Xonotic, which is a fork of the DarkPlaces-based Nexuiz game. Development began in March of 2010 on the Xonotic game. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterXonotic 0.8Resolution: 3840 x 2160 - Effects Quality: HighRadeon R9 290Radeon R7 370GeForce GTX 960GeForce GTX 980 TiGeForce GTX 970GeForce GTX 780 TiGeForce GTX 680Radeon R9 FuryRadeon R9 285UbuTom0670140210280350SE +/- 0.57, N = 3SE +/- 0.93, N = 3SE +/- 0.07, N = 3SE +/- 0.62, N = 3SE +/- 0.70, N = 3SE +/- 0.67, N = 3SE +/- 0.21, N = 3SE +/- 0.52, N = 3SE +/- 2.88, N = 3SE +/- 1.74, N = 3211.81145.37155.23325.74268.98312.74213.60236.89171.26175.47MIN: 111 / MAX: 334MIN: 66 / MAX: 205MIN: 97 / MAX: 183MIN: 212 / MAX: 465MIN: 169 / MAX: 332MIN: 189 / MAX: 430MIN: 128 / MAX: 264MIN: 127 / MAX: 505MIN: 85 / MAX: 240MIN: 84 / MAX: 387
OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterXonotic 0.8Resolution: 3840 x 2160 - Effects Quality: HighRadeon R9 290Radeon R7 370GeForce GTX 960GeForce GTX 980 TiGeForce GTX 970GeForce GTX 780 TiGeForce GTX 680Radeon R9 FuryRadeon R9 285UbuTom0660120180240300Min: 210.92 / Avg: 211.81 / Max: 212.87Min: 144.43 / Avg: 145.37 / Max: 147.23Min: 155.1 / Avg: 155.23 / Max: 155.31Min: 324.85 / Avg: 325.74 / Max: 326.92Min: 267.89 / Avg: 268.98 / Max: 270.28Min: 311.4 / Avg: 312.74 / Max: 313.49Min: 213.19 / Avg: 213.6 / Max: 213.91Min: 236.21 / Avg: 236.89 / Max: 237.91Min: 165.56 / Avg: 171.26 / Max: 174.81Min: 172.1 / Avg: 175.47 / Max: 177.92

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterXonotic 0.8Resolution: 3840 x 2160 - Effects Quality: UltraRadeon R9 290Radeon R7 370GeForce GTX 960GeForce GTX 980 TiGeForce GTX 970GeForce GTX 780 TiGeForce GTX 680Radeon R9 FuryRadeon R9 285UbuTom0650100150200250SE +/- 1.22, N = 3SE +/- 0.56, N = 3SE +/- 0.10, N = 3SE +/- 0.74, N = 3SE +/- 0.23, N = 3SE +/- 0.33, N = 3SE +/- 0.25, N = 3SE +/- 0.12, N = 3SE +/- 1.15, N = 3SE +/- 0.34, N = 3172.75111.47102.58237.20186.47239.49156.25195.46134.52152.57MIN: 78 / MAX: 291MIN: 45 / MAX: 177MIN: 54 / MAX: 139MIN: 129 / MAX: 344MIN: 97 / MAX: 257MIN: 121 / MAX: 347MIN: 81 / MAX: 215MIN: 86 / MAX: 438MIN: 48 / MAX: 210MIN: 72 / MAX: 326
OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterXonotic 0.8Resolution: 3840 x 2160 - Effects Quality: UltraRadeon R9 290Radeon R7 370GeForce GTX 960GeForce GTX 980 TiGeForce GTX 970GeForce GTX 780 TiGeForce GTX 680Radeon R9 FuryRadeon R9 285UbuTom064080120160200Min: 170.44 / Avg: 172.75 / Max: 174.57Min: 110.83 / Avg: 111.47 / Max: 112.59Min: 102.38 / Avg: 102.58 / Max: 102.72Min: 236.03 / Avg: 237.2 / Max: 238.57Min: 186.02 / Avg: 186.47 / Max: 186.71Min: 238.85 / Avg: 239.49 / Max: 239.92Min: 155.78 / Avg: 156.25 / Max: 156.59Min: 195.24 / Avg: 195.46 / Max: 195.67Min: 132.26 / Avg: 134.52 / Max: 136.04Min: 151.96 / Avg: 152.57 / Max: 153.16

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterXonotic 0.8Resolution: 3840 x 2160 - Effects Quality: UltimateRadeon R9 290Radeon R7 370GeForce GTX 960GeForce GTX 980 TiGeForce GTX 970GeForce GTX 780 TiGeForce GTX 680Radeon R9 FuryRadeon R9 285UbuTom064080120160200SE +/- 0.25, N = 3SE +/- 0.44, N = 3SE +/- 0.01, N = 3SE +/- 0.28, N = 3SE +/- 0.04, N = 3SE +/- 0.15, N = 3SE +/- 0.03, N = 3SE +/- 0.39, N = 3SE +/- 0.28, N = 3SE +/- 0.92, N = 3131.9380.6470.40164.84128.65170.01110.79149.88101.08127.07MIN: 47 / MAX: 246MIN: 35 / MAX: 147MIN: 35 / MAX: 112MIN: 46 / MAX: 275MIN: 62 / MAX: 206MIN: 61 / MAX: 287MIN: 53 / MAX: 180MIN: 34 / MAX: 385MIN: 39 / MAX: 180MIN: 36 / MAX: 315
OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterXonotic 0.8Resolution: 3840 x 2160 - Effects Quality: UltimateRadeon R9 290Radeon R7 370GeForce GTX 960GeForce GTX 980 TiGeForce GTX 970GeForce GTX 780 TiGeForce GTX 680Radeon R9 FuryRadeon R9 285UbuTom06306090120150Min: 131.43 / Avg: 131.93 / Max: 132.22Min: 79.77 / Avg: 80.64 / Max: 81.18Min: 70.39 / Avg: 70.4 / Max: 70.43Min: 164.37 / Avg: 164.84 / Max: 165.33Min: 128.6 / Avg: 128.65 / Max: 128.74Min: 169.79 / Avg: 170.01 / Max: 170.29Min: 110.73 / Avg: 110.79 / Max: 110.83Min: 149.26 / Avg: 149.88 / Max: 150.6Min: 100.62 / Avg: 101.08 / Max: 101.59Min: 125.41 / Avg: 127.07 / Max: 128.58

Unigine Valley

This test calculates the average frame-rate within the Valley demo for the Unigine engine, released in February 2013. This engine is extremely demanding on the system's graphics card. Unigine Valley relies upon an OpenGL GL3 Core Profile context. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterUnigine Valley 1.0Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Mode: FullscreenRadeon R9 290Radeon R7 370GeForce GTX 960GeForce GTX 980 TiGeForce GTX 970GeForce GTX 780 TiGeForce GTX 680Radeon R9 FuryRadeon R9 285UbuTom0620406080100SE +/- 0.01, N = 3SE +/- 0.02, N = 3SE +/- 0.02, N = 3SE +/- 0.18, N = 3SE +/- 0.07, N = 3SE +/- 0.20, N = 3SE +/- 0.01, N = 3SE +/- 0.42, N = 3SE +/- 0.01, N = 3SE +/- 0.23, N = 364.1934.9854.12107.9989.3892.2864.8278.6346.3567.35
OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterUnigine Valley 1.0Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Mode: FullscreenRadeon R9 290Radeon R7 370GeForce GTX 960GeForce GTX 980 TiGeForce GTX 970GeForce GTX 780 TiGeForce GTX 680Radeon R9 FuryRadeon R9 285UbuTom0620406080100Min: 64.18 / Avg: 64.19 / Max: 64.2Min: 34.96 / Avg: 34.98 / Max: 35.01Min: 54.1 / Avg: 54.12 / Max: 54.15Min: 107.64 / Avg: 107.99 / Max: 108.2Min: 89.29 / Avg: 89.38 / Max: 89.52Min: 91.88 / Avg: 92.28 / Max: 92.51Min: 64.81 / Avg: 64.82 / Max: 64.83Min: 77.8 / Avg: 78.63 / Max: 79.1Min: 46.34 / Avg: 46.35 / Max: 46.36Min: 67 / Avg: 67.35 / Max: 67.79

GpuTest

GpuTest is a cross-platform OpenGL benchmark developed at Geeks3D.com that offers tech demos such as FurMark, TessMark, and other workloads to stress various areas of GPUs and drivers. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.

OpenBenchmarking.orgPoints, More Is BetterGpuTest 0.7.0Test: Furmark - Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Mode: FullscreenRadeon R9 290Radeon R7 370GeForce GTX 960GeForce GTX 980 TiGeForce GTX 970GeForce GTX 780 TiGeForce GTX 680Radeon R9 FuryRadeon R9 285UbuTom0615003000450060007500SE +/- 1.33, N = 3SE +/- 0.00, N = 3SE +/- 0.00, N = 3SE +/- 0.58, N = 3SE +/- 0.58, N = 3SE +/- 3.67, N = 3SE +/- 1.00, N = 3SE +/- 3.38, N = 3SE +/- 0.00, N = 3SE +/- 53.42, N = 31716105710672624175820221281308713997153
OpenBenchmarking.orgPoints, More Is BetterGpuTest 0.7.0Test: Furmark - Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Mode: FullscreenRadeon R9 290Radeon R7 370GeForce GTX 960GeForce GTX 980 TiGeForce GTX 970GeForce GTX 780 TiGeForce GTX 680Radeon R9 FuryRadeon R9 285UbuTom0612002400360048006000Min: 1715 / Avg: 1716.33 / Max: 1719Min: 1057 / Avg: 1057 / Max: 1057Min: 1067 / Avg: 1067 / Max: 1067Min: 2623 / Avg: 2624 / Max: 2625Min: 1757 / Avg: 1758 / Max: 1759Min: 2018 / Avg: 2021.67 / Max: 2029Min: 1279 / Avg: 1281 / Max: 1282Min: 3080 / Avg: 3086.67 / Max: 3091Min: 1399 / Avg: 1399 / Max: 1399Min: 7067 / Avg: 7153.33 / Max: 7251