Intel Core i9-12900K vs. AMD Ryzen 9 5900X Benchmarks

Add Processor To Compare:

* Note: Due to differences in Linux drivers/interfaces, the reported CPU clock may be displayed different depending upon the CPU - i.e. base vs. boost frequency.
* Disclosure: OpenBenchmarking.org may earn a commission/referral on affiliate shopping links should you decide to make any purchases from the third-party shopping links.

Add another performance-per-dollar value in the table above to see customized performance-per-dollar graphs.

Of the components selected for comparison, there were 322 benchmarks in common (matching test profile, test version and any configurable test options) and where that data was statistically significant and at least three independent data points for each component of the public test results on OpenBenchmarking.org.

Intel Core i9-12900K had the most wins, coming in first place for 81% of the tests.

Based on the geometric mean of all complete results, the fastest (Intel Core i9-12900K) was 1.16x the speed of the slowest (AMD Ryzen 9 5900X 12-Core).

The results with the greatest spread from best to worst included: Xcompact3d Incompact3d (Input: input.i3d 193 Cells Per Direction) at 2.626x, Java JMH (Throughput) at 2.286x, Xcompact3d Incompact3d (Input: input.i3d 129 Cells Per Direction) at 2.266x, PyHPC Benchmarks (Device: CPU - Backend: PyTorch - Project Size: 65536 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing) at 2.214x, PyHPC Benchmarks (Device: CPU - Backend: PyTorch - Project Size: 262144 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing) at 2.018x, ASKAP (Test: tConvolve MPI - Degridding) at 1.943x, SciMark (Computational Test: Sparse Matrix Multiply) at 1.911x, SVT-VP9 (Tuning: Visual Quality Optimized - Input: Bosphorus 4K) at 1.764x, PyHPC Benchmarks (Device: CPU - Backend: PyTorch - Project Size: 1048576 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing) at 1.749x, SVT-HEVC (Tuning: 10 - Input: Bosphorus 4K) at 1.667x.

322 Benchmarks Found In Common - Sort By: Greatest Spread