AMD EPYC 9654 vs. 2 x Intel Xeon Platinum 8490H Benchmarks

Add Processor To Compare:

* Note: Due to differences in Linux drivers/interfaces, the reported CPU clock may be displayed different depending upon the CPU - i.e. base vs. boost frequency.
* Disclosure: OpenBenchmarking.org may earn a commission/referral on affiliate shopping links should you decide to make any purchases from the third-party shopping links.

Of the components selected for comparison, there were 307 benchmarks in common (matching test profile, test version and any configurable test options) and where that data was statistically significant and at least three independent data points for each component of the public test results on OpenBenchmarking.org.

2 x Intel Xeon Platinum 8490H had the most wins, coming in first place for 53% of the tests.

Based on the geometric mean of all complete results, the fastest (2 x Intel Xeon Platinum 8490H) was 1.024x the speed of the slowest (AMD EPYC 9654 96-Core).

The results with the greatest spread from best to worst included: OpenVINO (Model: Face Detection FP16 - Device: CPU) at 6.891x, PostgreSQL (Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 1000 - Mode: Read Only) at 5.667x, PostgreSQL (Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 1000 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency) at 5.663x, OpenVINO (Model: Weld Porosity Detection FP16 - Device: CPU) at 5.425x, OpenCV (Test: Core) at 5.083x, OpenVINO (Model: Weld Porosity Detection FP16-INT8 - Device: CPU) at 4.951x, PostgreSQL (Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 1000 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency) at 4.88x, PostgreSQL (Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 1000 - Mode: Read Only) at 4.831x, OpenVINO (Model: Weld Porosity Detection FP16 - Device: CPU) at 4.378x, OpenVINO (Model: Face Detection FP16-INT8 - Device: CPU) at 4.323x.

307 Benchmarks Found In Common - Sort By: Greatest Spread