AMD EPYC 7F32 vs. AMD EPYC 7F52 vs. AMD EPYC 7F72 Benchmarks

Add Processor To Compare:

* Note: Due to differences in Linux drivers/interfaces, the reported CPU clock may be displayed different depending upon the CPU - i.e. base vs. boost frequency.
* Disclosure: OpenBenchmarking.org may earn a commission/referral on affiliate shopping links should you decide to make any purchases from the third-party shopping links.

Of the components selected for comparison, there were 368 benchmarks in common (matching test profile, test version and any configurable test options) and where that data was statistically significant and at least three independent data points for each component of the public test results on OpenBenchmarking.org.

AMD EPYC 7F72 24-Core had the most wins, coming in first place for 59% of the tests.

Based on the geometric mean of all complete results, the fastest (AMD EPYC 7F72 24-Core) was 1.538x the speed of the slowest (AMD EPYC 7F32 8-Core). AMD EPYC 7F52 16-Core was 0.896x the speed of AMD EPYC 7F72 24-Core and AMD EPYC 7F32 8-Core was 0.726x the speed of AMD EPYC 7F52 16-Core.

The results with the greatest spread from best to worst included: Stress-NG (Test: Malloc) at 4.158x, Apache Cassandra (Test: Writes) at 3.674x, oneDNN (Harness: IP Batch 1D - Data Type: f32 - Engine: CPU) at 3.307x, LAMMPS Molecular Dynamics Simulator (Model: 20k Atoms) at 2.917x, OpenVINO (Model: Age Gender Recognition Retail 0013 FP16 - Device: CPU) at 2.904x, John The Ripper (Test: Blowfish) at 2.89x, OpenVINO (Model: Age Gender Recognition Retail 0013 FP32 - Device: CPU) at 2.882x, Stockfish (Total Time) at 2.841x, Facebook RocksDB (Test: Read While Writing) at 2.838x, OSPray (Demo: San Miguel - Renderer: Path Tracer) at 2.817x.

368 Benchmarks Found In Common - Sort By: Greatest Spread