AMD EPYC 72F3 vs. AMD EPYC 7F32 Benchmarks

Add Processor To Compare:

* Note: Due to differences in Linux drivers/interfaces, the reported CPU clock may be displayed different depending upon the CPU - i.e. base vs. boost frequency.
* Disclosure: OpenBenchmarking.org may earn a commission/referral on affiliate shopping links should you decide to make any purchases from the third-party shopping links.

Of the components selected for comparison, there were 404 benchmarks in common (matching test profile, test version and any configurable test options) and where that data was statistically significant and at least three independent data points for each component of the public test results on OpenBenchmarking.org.

AMD EPYC 72F3 8-Core had the most wins, coming in first place for 91% of the tests.

Based on the geometric mean of all complete results, the fastest (AMD EPYC 72F3 8-Core) was 1.173x the speed of the slowest (AMD EPYC 7F32 8-Core).

The results with the greatest spread from best to worst included: PyHPC Benchmarks (Device: CPU - Backend: Numpy - Project Size: 4194304 - Benchmark: Equation of State) at 2.428x, CLOMP (Static OMP Speedup) at 2.318x, Stress-NG (Test: Socket Activity) at 1.993x, oneDNN (Harness: IP Shapes 1D - Data Type: u8s8f32 - Engine: CPU) at 1.971x, oneDNN (Harness: Deconvolution Batch shapes_1d - Data Type: u8s8f32 - Engine: CPU) at 1.963x, PyHPC Benchmarks (Device: CPU - Backend: Numpy - Project Size: 4194304 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing) at 1.931x, Stress-NG (Test: Glibc C String Functions) at 1.898x, Caffe (Model: AlexNet - Acceleration: CPU - Iterations: 100) at 1.856x, Mobile Neural Network (Model: mobilenetV3) at 1.822x, PyHPC Benchmarks (Device: CPU - Backend: PyTorch - Project Size: 4194304 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing) at 1.769x.

404 Benchmarks Found In Common - Sort By: Title