WebP Image Encode

This is a test of Google's libwebp with the cwebp image encode utility and using a sample 6000x4000 pixel JPEG image as the input.

To run this test with the Phoronix Test Suite, the basic command is: phoronix-test-suite benchmark webp.

Test Created

22 September 2020

Last Updated

22 September 2020

Test Maintainer

Michael Larabel 

Test Type

Processor

Average Install Time

26 Seconds

Average Run Time

1 Minute, 16 Seconds

Test Dependencies

C/C++ Compiler Toolchain + JPEG Library

Supported Platforms


Public Result UploadsReported Installs*Test Completions*OpenBenchmarking.orgEventsWebP Image Encode Popularity Statisticspts/webp2020.092020.102020.112020.122021.012021.022021.032021.046001200180024003000
* Data based on those opting to upload their test results to OpenBenchmarking.org and users enabling the opt-in anonymous statistics reporting while running benchmarks from an Internet-connected platform.
Data current as of Wed, 14 Apr 2021 20:37:03 GMT.
Default17.6%Quality 100, Lossless21.7%Quality 100, Lossless, Highest Compression20.8%Quality 100, Highest Compression21.1%Quality 10018.7%Encode Settings Option PopularityOpenBenchmarking.org

Revision History

pts/webp-1.0.0   [View Source]   Tue, 22 Sep 2020 15:36:31 GMT
Initial libwebp cwebp benchmark.

Suites Using This Test

Imaging

Creator Workloads


Performance Metrics

Analyze Test Configuration:

WebP Image Encode 1.1

Encode Settings: Quality 100, Highest Compression

OpenBenchmarking.org metrics for this test profile configuration based on 793 public results since 22 September 2020 with the latest data as of 12 April 2021.

Below is an overview of the generalized performance for components where there is sufficient statistically significant data based upon user-uploaded results. It is important to keep in mind particularly in the Linux/open-source space there can be vastly different OS configurations, with this overview intended to offer just general guidance as to the performance expectations.

Component
Percentile Rank
# Matching Public Results
Encode Time - Seconds (Average)
97th
35
5.3 +/- 0.1
94th
8
5.4 +/- 0.1
94th
30
5.4 +/- 0.1
91st
12
5.5 +/- 0.1
88th
7
5.9 +/- 0.3
87th
22
5.9 +/- 0.1
85th
6
6.1 +/- 0.3
83rd
7
6.3 +/- 0.1
83rd
7
6.3 +/- 0.1
76th
12
6.6 +/- 0.1
Mid-Tier
75th
> 6.6
75th
12
6.7 +/- 0.1
70th
3
6.9 +/- 0.1
63rd
8
7.3 +/- 0.1
61st
4
7.4 +/- 0.3
60th
7
7.5 +/- 0.1
54th
18
7.8 +/- 0.2
53rd
20
7.9 +/- 0.3
53rd
10
7.9 +/- 0.2
51st
10
7.9 +/- 0.2
Median
50th
7.9
47th
5
8.0 +/- 0.1
39th
3
8.3 +/- 0.1
39th
8
8.3 +/- 0.2
37th
14
8.5 +/- 0.3
36th
3
8.5 +/- 0.1
34th
6
8.6 +/- 0.7
34th
3
8.6 +/- 0.2
33rd
6
8.7 +/- 0.9
31st
7
8.8 +/- 0.1
27th
5
9.2 +/- 0.2
Low-Tier
25th
> 9.3
25th
4
9.3 +/- 1.2
24th
6
9.3 +/- 0.2
24th
6
9.3 +/- 0.2
24th
8
9.4 +/- 0.2
20th
6
9.5 +/- 0.2
20th
6
9.5 +/- 0.2
20th
6
9.5 +/- 0.2
20th
6
9.5 +/- 0.2
20th
6
9.5 +/- 0.2
14th
6
9.8 +/- 0.2
14th
4
9.8 +/- 0.2
14th
6
9.8 +/- 0.1
6th
4
11.9 +/- 0.2
5th
6
12.2 +/- 0.1
2nd
7
25.2 +/- 2.5
OpenBenchmarking.orgDistribution Of Public Results - Encode Settings: Quality 100, Highest Compression793 Results Range From 4 To 90 Encode Time - Seconds41220283644526068768492100160320480640800

Based on OpenBenchmarking.org data, the selected test / test configuration (WebP Image Encode 1.1 - Encode Settings: Quality 100, Highest Compression) has an average run-time of 2 minutes. By default this test profile is set to run at least 3 times but may increase if the standard deviation exceeds pre-defined defaults or other calculations deem additional runs necessary for greater statistical accuracy of the result.

OpenBenchmarking.orgMinutesTime Required To Complete BenchmarkEncode Settings: Quality 100, Highest CompressionRun-Time246810Min: 1 / Avg: 1.02 / Max: 5

Based on public OpenBenchmarking.org results, the selected test / test configuration has an average standard deviation of 0.1%.

OpenBenchmarking.orgPercent, Fewer Is BetterAverage Deviation Between RunsEncode Settings: Quality 100, Highest CompressionDeviation246810Min: 0 / Avg: 0.08 / Max: 1

Does It Scale Well With Increasing Cores?

No, based on the automated analysis of the collected public benchmark data, this test / test settings does not generally scale well with increasing CPU core counts. Data based on publicly available results for this test / test settings, separated by vendor, result divided by the reference CPU clock speed, grouped by matching physical CPU core count, and normalized against the smallest core count tested from each vendor for each CPU having a sufficient number of test samples and statistically significant data.

AMDIntelOpenBenchmarking.orgRelative Core Scaling To BaseWebP Image Encode CPU Core ScalingEncode Settings: Quality 100, Highest Compression4681216243248640.48750.9751.46251.952.4375

Recent Test Results

OpenBenchmarking.org Results Compare

1 System - 111 Benchmark Results

2 x AMD EPYC 7V13 64-Core - Microsoft Virtual Machine - 442GB

CentOS Linux 8 - 4.18.0-147.8.1.el8_1.x86_64 - GCC 8.3.1 20190507

3 Systems - 94 Benchmark Results

Intel Core i9-11900K - ASUS ROG MAXIMUS XIII HERO - 2 x 16384 MB 3200MHz Corsair CMK32GX4M2Z3600C18

Microsoft Windows 10 Pro Build 19042 - 10.0 - 10.0.19041.868

2 Systems - 92 Benchmark Results

Intel Core i9-11900K - ASUS ROG MAXIMUS XIII HERO - 2 x 16384 MB 3200MHz Corsair CMK32GX4M2Z3600C18

Microsoft Windows 10 Pro Build 19042 - 10.0 - 10.0.19041.868

28 Systems - 34 Benchmark Results

Intel Core i7-1165G7 - Dell 0FW9PR - Intel Tiger Lake-LP

Ubuntu 20.10 - 5.11.7-051107-generic - GNOME Shell 3.38.2

28 Systems - 33 Benchmark Results

Intel Core i7-1165G7 - Dell 0FW9PR - Intel Tiger Lake-LP

Ubuntu 20.10 - 5.8.0-44-generic - GNOME Shell 3.38.2

27 Systems - 31 Benchmark Results

Intel Core i7-1165G7 - Dell 0FW9PR - Intel Tiger Lake-LP

Ubuntu 20.10 - 5.11.4-051104-generic - GNOME Shell 3.38.2

26 Systems - 30 Benchmark Results

Intel Core i7-1165G7 - Dell 0FW9PR - Intel Tiger Lake-LP

Ubuntu 20.10 - 5.8.0-44-generic - GNOME Shell 3.38.2

25 Systems - 30 Benchmark Results

Intel Core i7-1165G7 - Dell 0FW9PR - Intel Tiger Lake-LP

Ubuntu 20.10 - 5.11.0-051100-generic - GNOME Shell 3.38.2

23 Systems - 30 Benchmark Results

Intel Core i7-1165G7 - Dell 0FW9PR - Intel Tiger Lake-LP

Ubuntu 20.10 - 5.8.0-44-generic - GNOME Shell 3.38.2

Most Popular Test Results

OpenBenchmarking.org Results Compare

3 Systems - 268 Benchmark Results

Intel Core i5-2520M - HP 161C - Intel 2nd Generation Core DRAM

Ubuntu 18.04 - 4.18.0-20-generic - GNOME Shell 3.28.3

2 Systems - 535 Benchmark Results

Intel Core i7-1065G7 - Dell 06CDVY - Intel Device 34ef

Ubuntu 20.04 - 5.9.0-050900rc7daily20201003-generic - GNOME Shell 3.36.4

11 Systems - 217 Benchmark Results

AMD Ryzen 7 3800XT 8-Core - ASUS ROG CROSSHAIR VIII HERO - AMD Starship

Ubuntu 20.04 - 5.9.0-050900-generic - GNOME Shell 3.36.4

4 Systems - 99 Benchmark Results

Intel Core i7-1165G7 - Dell 0GG9PT - Intel Tiger Lake-LP

Ubuntu 20.10 - 5.9.2-050902-generic - GNOME Shell 3.38.1

3 Systems - 174 Benchmark Results

Intel Core i9-10900K - Gigabyte Z490 AORUS MASTER - Intel Comet Lake PCH

Fedora 32 - 5.8.11-200.fc32.x86_64 - GNOME Shell 3.36.6

12 Systems - 229 Benchmark Results

AMD Ryzen 5 2600 Six-Core - ASUS ROG CROSSHAIR VIII HERO - AMD 17h

Ubuntu 20.04 - 5.9.0-050900-generic - GNOME Shell 3.36.4

5 Systems - 99 Benchmark Results

Intel Core i7-1165G7 - Dell 0GG9PT - Intel Tiger Lake-LP

Ubuntu 20.10 - 5.9.2-050902-generic - GNOME Shell 3.38.1

3 Systems - 131 Benchmark Results

Intel Core i5-10600K - ASUS PRIME Z490M-PLUS - Intel Comet Lake PCH

Ubuntu 20.04 - 5.9.0-050900daily20201012-generic - GNOME Shell 3.36.4

3 Systems - 191 Benchmark Results

AMD Ryzen 3 2200G - ASUS PRIME B350M-E - AMD Raven

Ubuntu 20.10 - 5.8.0-38-generic - GNOME Shell 3.38.1

3 Systems - 202 Benchmark Results

Intel Core i7-7700K - MSI Z270-A PRO - Intel Xeon E3-1200 v6

Ubuntu 20.04 - 5.4.0-28-generic - GNOME Shell 3.36.1

2 Systems - 78 Benchmark Results

Intel Core i7-10700T - Logic Supply RXM-181 - Intel Comet Lake PCH

openSUSE 15.3 - 5.3.18-47-default - KDE Plasma 5.18.6

Find More Test Results