Xcompact3d Incompact3d

Xcompact3d Incompact3d is a Fortran-MPI based, finite difference high-performance code for solving the incompressible Navier-Stokes equation and as many as you need scalar transport equations.

To run this test with the Phoronix Test Suite, the basic command is: phoronix-test-suite benchmark incompact3d.

Project Site

github.com

Test Created

17 September 2020

Last Updated

18 March 2021

Test Maintainer

Michael Larabel

Test Type

Processor

Average Install Time

1 Minute, 3 Seconds

Average Run Time

27 Minutes, 47 Seconds

Test Dependencies

Fortran + OpenMPI + FFTW + C/C++ Compiler Toolchain

Accolades

10k+ Downloads

Supported Platforms

* Uploading of benchmark result data to OpenBenchmarking.org is always optional (opt-in) via the Phoronix Test Suite for users wishing to share their results publicly.
** Data based on those opting to upload their test results to OpenBenchmarking.org and users enabling the opt-in anonymous statistics reporting while running benchmarks from an Internet-connected platform.
*** Test profile page view reporting began March 2021.
Data updated weekly as of 13 April 2024.

Revision History

pts/incompact3d-2.0.2 [View Source] Thu, 18 Mar 2021 05:40:41 GMT
Use 193 option rather than 192.

pts/incompact3d-2.0.1 [View Source] Wed, 17 Mar 2021 09:22:38 GMT
Add a 192 cell per direction option for HEDT systems.

pts/incompact3d-2.0.0 [View Source] Wed, 17 Mar 2021 08:12:12 GMT
Update against Xcompact3D/Incompact3D from GitHub, use X3D-benchmarking input, add lower 129 cell option too. Per https://github.com/phoronix-test-suite/phoronix-test-suite/issues/512

pts/incompact3d-1.0.0 [View Source] Thu, 17 Sep 2020 16:44:55 GMT
Add Incompact3D xcompact3d solver benchmark.

Suites Using This Test

HPC - High Performance Computing

Molecular Dynamics

Scientific Computing

MPI Benchmarks

Performance Metrics

Analyze Test Configuration:

Xcompact3d Incompact3d 2021-03-11

Input: X3D-benchmarking input.i3d

OpenBenchmarking.org metrics for this test profile configuration based on 997 public results since 17 March 2021 with the latest data as of 17 April 2024.

Below is an overview of the generalized performance for components where there is sufficient statistically significant data based upon user-uploaded results. It is important to keep in mind particularly in the Linux/open-source space there can be vastly different OS configurations, with this overview intended to offer just general guidance as to the performance expectations.

Component

Percentile Rank

# Compatible Public Results

Seconds (Average)

2 x AMD EPYC 9384X 32-Core

95th

172 ^{+/- 7}

2 x INTEL XEON PLATINUM 8592

94th

173 ^{+/- 7}

2 x Intel Xeon Platinum 8490H

91st

196 ^{+/- 3}

2 x AMD EPYC 9754 128-Core

89th

232 ^{+/- 20}

2 x AMD EPYC 9184X 16-Core

88th

240 ^{+/- 3}

ARMv8 Neoverse-V2 72-Core

84th

255 ^{+/- 9}

2 x AMD EPYC 7773X 64-Core

78th

270 ^{+/- 13}

Mid-Tier

75th

> 288

2 x AMD EPYC 7573X 32-Core

75th

289 ^{+/- 4}

2 x AMD EPYC 7713 64-Core

66th

301 ^{+/- 3}

2 x AMD EPYC 7763 64-Core

66th

301 ^{+/- 4}

2 x Intel Xeon Platinum 8380

65th

303 ^{+/- 23}

2 x AMD EPYC 7663 56-Core

63rd

305 ^{+/- 5}

2 x AMD EPYC 7643 48-Core

62nd

309 ^{+/- 4}

2 x Intel Xeon Platinum 8362

58th

321 ^{+/- 7}

Ampere ARMv8 Neoverse-N1 256-Core

58th

321 ^{+/- 18}

AMD EPYC 9374F 32-Core

58th

322 ^{+/- 2}

2 x AMD EPYC 7543 32-Core

56th

324 ^{+/- 3}

2 x AMD EPYC 74F3 24-Core

52nd

345 ^{+/- 12}

2 x AMD EPYC 75F3 32-Core

52nd

350 ^{+/- 37}

Intel Xeon Platinum 8490H

51st

356 ^{+/- 4}

Median

50th

358

2 x AMD EPYC 7443 24-Core

49th

366 ^{+/- 4}

AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX 96-Cores

47th

375 ^{+/- 9}

2 x AMD EPYC 7453 28-Core

47th

377 ^{+/- 5}

2 x AMD EPYC 7513 32-Core

46th

383 ^{+/- 36}

2 x AMD EPYC 73F3 16-Core

46th

384 ^{+/- 4}

2 x AMD EPYC 7373X 16-Core

44th

394 ^{+/- 28}

AMD EPYC 9684X 96-Core

42nd

415 ^{+/- 31}

2 x AMD EPYC 7343 16-Core

42nd

422 ^{+/- 31}

2 x AMD EPYC 7313 16-Core

42nd

423 ^{+/- 3}

AMD EPYC 9384X 32-Core

42nd

425 ^{+/- 2}

2 x Intel Xeon Platinum 8280

36th

491 ^{+/- 49}

AMD EPYC 9754 128-Core

36th

494

2 x AMD EPYC 72F3 8-Core

35th

522 ^{+/- 7}

AMD EPYC 8534P 64-Core

32nd

558 ^{+/- 3}

AMD EPYC 8534PN 64-Core

31st

560 ^{+/- 3}

AMD EPYC 7773X 64-Core

29th

576 ^{+/- 2}

Intel Xeon Platinum 8380

28th

578 ^{+/- 55}

Intel Xeon Platinum 8362

27th

590 ^{+/- 3}

Low-Tier

25th

> 605

AMD EPYC 7713 64-Core

24th

607 ^{+/- 3}

ARMv8 Neoverse-N1 128-Core

24th

607 ^{+/- 1}

AMD EPYC 7763 64-Core

23rd

608 ^{+/- 5}

AMD EPYC 7663 56-Core

20th

614 ^{+/- 3}

AMD EPYC 7643 48-Core

20th

617 ^{+/- 3}

AMD EPYC 7573X 32-Core

20th

620 ^{+/- 3}

AMD EPYC 75F3 32-Core

18th

640 ^{+/- 7}

Intel Xeon Gold 6342

15th

648 ^{+/- 7}

2 x Intel Xeon Gold 5220R

15th

659 ^{+/- 12}

AMD EPYC 7543 32-Core

15th

660 ^{+/- 31}

AMD EPYC 7713P 64-Core

14th

664

AMD EPYC 74F3 24-Core

13th

678 ^{+/- 14}

AMD EPYC 7702 64-Core

13th

690 ^{+/- 1}

AMD EPYC 7443 24-Core

11th

723 ^{+/- 7}

AMD EPYC 7373X 16-Core

10th

727 ^{+/- 2}

AMD EPYC 7453 28-Core

10th

728 ^{+/- 6}

AMD EPYC 73F3 16-Core

8th

751 ^{+/- 5}

AMD EPYC 7413 24-Core

8th

752 ^{+/- 16}

AMD EPYC 7513 32-Core

8th

753 ^{+/- 43}

Intel Xeon Gold 6346

6th

827 ^{+/- 43}

AMD EPYC 7313 16-Core

6th

827 ^{+/- 8}

AMD EPYC 7343 16-Core

6th

827 ^{+/- 42}

Intel Xeon Platinum 8280

4th

885 ^{+/- 91}

AMD EPYC 72F3 8-Core

4th

1039 ^{+/- 12}

AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3990X 64-Core

2nd

1347 ^{+/- 7}

AMD Ryzen 9 5950X 16-Core

1st

2865 ^{+/- 97}

Intel Xeon E-2278G

1st

3461 ^{+/- 4}

Based on OpenBenchmarking.org data, the selected test / test configuration (Xcompact3d Incompact3d 2021-03-11 - Input: X3D-benchmarking input.i3d) has an average run-time of 26 minutes. By default this test profile is set to run at least 3 times but may increase if the standard deviation exceeds pre-defined defaults or other calculations deem additional runs necessary for greater statistical accuracy of the result.

Based on public OpenBenchmarking.org results, the selected test / test configuration has an average standard deviation of 0.3%.

Does It Scale Well With Increasing Cores?

Yes, based on the automated analysis of the collected public benchmark data, this test / test settings does generally scale well with increasing CPU core counts. Data based on publicly available results for this test / test settings, separated by vendor, result divided by the reference CPU clock speed, grouped by matching physical CPU core count, and normalized against the smallest core count tested from each vendor for each CPU having a sufficient number of test samples and statistically significant data.

Notable Instruction Set Usage

Notable instruction set extensions supported by this test, based on an automatic analysis by the Phoronix Test Suite / OpenBenchmarking.org analytics engine.

Instruction Set

Support

Instructions Detected

SSE2 (SSE2)

Used by default on supported hardware.

CVTSI2SD MULSD ADDSD COMISD SUBSD DIVSD MOVAPD XORPD CVTTSD2SI ANDPD UCOMISD MINSD MOVDQU MAXSD SQRTSD CVTSD2SS CVTSS2SD CMPLESD ANDNPD ORPD MOVDQA

Last automated analysis: 17 January 2022

This test profile binary relies on the shared libraries libgfortran.so.5, libm.so.6, libc.so.6, libmpi.so.40, libopen-pal.so.40, libquadmath.so.0, libopen-rte.so.40, libhwloc.so.15, libz.so.1, libudev.so.1.

Tested CPU Architectures

This benchmark has been successfully tested on the below mentioned architectures. The CPU architectures listed is where successful OpenBenchmarking.org result uploads occurred, namely for helping to determine if a given test is compatible with various alternative CPU architectures.

CPU Architecture

Kernel Identifier

Verified On

Intel / AMD x86 64-bit

x86_64

(Many Processors)

ARMv8 64-bit

aarch64

ARMv8 Neoverse-N1 128-Core, ARMv8 Neoverse-N1 80-Core, ARMv8 Neoverse-V2 72-Core, Ampere ARMv8 Neoverse-N1 128-Core, Ampere ARMv8 Neoverse-N1 256-Core, Ampere Altra ARMv8 Neoverse-N1 160-Core

Ubuntu 24.04 AMD EPYC Genoa-X Benchmark Preview 1 System - 91 Benchmark Results	2 x AMD EPYC 9684X 96-Core - AMD Titanite_4G - AMD Device 14a4 Ubuntu 24.04 - 6.8.0-11-generic - GNOME Shell 45.3
Linux Distros Emerald Rapids 4 Systems - 125 Benchmark Results	2 x INTEL XEON PLATINUM 8592+ - Quanta Cloud QuantaGrid D54Q-2U S6Q-MB-MPS - Intel Device 1bce Arch Linux - 6.7.6-arch1-2 - GCC 13.2.1 20230801
Linux Distros Emerald Rapids 3 Systems - 125 Benchmark Results	2 x INTEL XEON PLATINUM 8592+ - Quanta Cloud QuantaGrid D54Q-2U S6Q-MB-MPS - Intel Device 1bce Ubuntu 23.10 - 6.5.0-17-generic - GCC 13.2.0
Linux Distros Emerald Rapids 1 System - 125 Benchmark Results	2 x INTEL XEON PLATINUM 8592+ - Quanta Cloud QuantaGrid D54Q-2U S6Q-MB-MPS - Intel Device 1bce Ubuntu 23.10 - 6.5.0-17-generic - GCC 13.2.0
RPi5-8GB-Raspbian-02 1 System - 494 Benchmark Results
gh200 nvidia 2 Systems - 62 Benchmark Results	ARMv8 Neoverse-V2 - Quanta Cloud QuantaGrid S74G-2U 1S7GZ9Z0000 S7G MB - 1 x 480 GB DRAM-6400MT Ubuntu 23.10 - 6.5.0-15-generic - GCC 13.2.0
AMD EPYC Zen 1 1 System - 403 Benchmark Results	AMD EPYC 7601 32-Core - TYAN B8026T70AE24HR - AMD 17h Ubuntu 23.10 - 6.6.9-060609-generic - GNOME Shell 45.0
AMD EPYC Zen 1 1 System - 390 Benchmark Results	AMD EPYC 7601 32-Core - TYAN B8026T70AE24HR - AMD 17h Ubuntu 23.10 - 6.6.9-060609-generic - GNOME Shell 45.0
2023-12-10-1631 1 System - 486 Benchmark Results	Intel Core i3-12100 - MSI MAG B660M MORTAR DDR4 - Intel Alder Lake-S PCH Arch Linux - 6.1.66-1-lts - GCC 13.2.1 20230801 + Clang 16.0.6
2023-12-10-1631 1 System - 486 Benchmark Results
2023-12-08-0937 1 System - 21 Benchmark Results	AMD EPYC 7402P 24-Core - Supermicro H11SSL-i v2.00 - AMD Starship Ubuntu 22.04 - 5.15.0-89-generic - GNOME Shell 42.9
epyc9684x-kernel-xanmodv4-incompact3d 1 System - 1 Benchmark Result	2 x AMD EPYC 9684X 96-Core - Giga Computing MZ93-FS0-000 v00010101 - AMD Device 14a4 Ubuntu 22.04 - 6.6.3-x64v4-xanmod1 - X Server 1.21.1.4
2023-11-01-0307 1 System - 566 Benchmark Results	ARMv8 Cortex-A72 - BCM2835 Raspberry Pi 4 Model B Rev 1.5 - Broadcom BCM2711 Arch Linux ARM - 6.1.58-2-rpi-ARCH - GCC 12.1.0 + Clang 16.0.6
2023-10-26-1352 1 System - 621 Benchmark Results	AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G - LENOVO 318E - AMD Renoir Arch Linux - 6.1.59-1-lts - GCC 13.2.1 20230801 + Clang 16.0.6
Ubuntu 23.10 Server Benchmarks 1 System - 650 Benchmark Results

AMD EPYC 7763 Cooling Performance 3 Systems - 189 Benchmark Results	AMD EPYC 7763 64-Core - Supermicro H12SSL-i v1.01 - AMD Starship Ubuntu 20.04 - 5.12.0-051200rc6daily20210408-generic - GNOME Shell 3.36.4
openSUSE Tumbleweed GCC12 Benchmarks 2 Systems - 101 Benchmark Results	2 x Intel Xeon Platinum 8380 - Intel M50CYP2SB2U - Intel Device 0998 openSUSE 20220510 - 5.17.5-1-default - GCC 12.1.0
Cascade Lake Clear Linux 2021 2 Systems - 95 Benchmark Results	2 x Intel Xeon Platinum 8280 - GIGABYTE MD61-SC2-00 v01000100 - Intel Sky Lake-E DMI3 Registers Ubuntu 21.04 - 5.11.0-11-generic - GNOME Shell 3.38.3
EPYC 7702 April 2021 3 Systems - 117 Benchmark Results	AMD EPYC 7702 64-Core - ASRockRack EPYCD8 - AMD Starship Ubuntu 20.04 - 5.9.0-050900rc6daily20200921-generic - GNOME Shell 3.36.4
xeon-platinum-8380-2p-smoke-run 8 Systems - 188 Benchmark Results	2 x Intel Xeon Platinum 8380 - Intel M50CYP2SB2U - Intel Device 0998 Ubuntu 20.04 - 5.11.0-051100-generic - GNOME Shell 3.36.4
Ubuntu 22.04 Server Benchmarks 2 Systems - 705 Benchmark Results	AMD EPYC 7713 64-Core - AMD DAYTONA_X - AMD Starship Ubuntu 22.04 - 5.15.0-47-generic - GNOME Shell 42.4
AMD EPYC 9684X 2P Genoa-X Benchmarks 12 Systems - 69 Benchmark Results	2 x AMD EPYC 9554 64-Core - AMD Titanite_4G - AMD Device 14a4 Ubuntu 23.04 - 6.2.0-23-generic - GNOME Shell 44.0
CentOS Stream 8 Featured Processor Comparison	2 x Intel Xeon Platinum 8380 - Intel M50CYP2SB2U - Intel Device 0998 CentOS Stream 8 - 4.18.0-348.2.1.el8_5.x86_64 - GNOME Shell 3.32.2
MGLRU Kernel Tests 2 Systems - 55 Benchmark Results	2 x AMD EPYC 7742 64-Core - Supermicro H11DSi-NT v2.00 - AMD Starship Ubuntu 21.10 - 5.16.0-rc8-mglru-pts - GNOME Shell 40.5
server-cpus-june-2021 3 Systems - 214 Benchmark Results	Intel Xeon Platinum 8380 - Intel M50CYP2SB2U - Intel Device 0998 Ubuntu 21.04 - 5.13.0-051300rc4-generic - GNOME Shell 3.38.4
Microsoft Azure EPYC 7003 HPC HBv3 Benchmarks 5 Systems - 63 Benchmark Results	2 x AMD EPYC 7551 32-Core - Microsoft Virtual Machine - 226GB CentOS Linux 8 - 4.18.0-147.8.1.el8_1.x86_64 - GCC 8.3.1 20190507
onerun EPYC data 2 Systems - 255 Benchmark Results	2 x AMD EPYC 7763 64-Core - AMD DAYTONA_X - AMD Starship Ubuntu 20.04 - 5.11.6-051106-generic - GNOME Shell 3.36.4
384x 5 Systems - 89 Benchmark Results	2 x AMD EPYC 9384X 32-Core - AMD Titanite_4G - AMD Device 14a4 Ubuntu 22.04 - 5.15.0-47-generic - GNOME Shell 42.4
CentOS Stream 9 vs. Other Linux Benchmarks 12 Systems - 59 Benchmark Results	2 x AMD EPYC 7763 64-Core - AMD DAYTONA_X - AMD Starship Clear Linux OS 35400 - 5.15.7-1106.native - GNOME Shell 41.1
Microsoft Azure EPYC Milan-X HBv3 Benchmarks Featured Processor Comparison	2 x AMD EPYC 7V13 64-Core - Microsoft Virtual Machine - 442GB CentOS Linux 8 - 4.18.0-147.8.1.el8_1.x86_64 - GCC 8.3.1 20190507

Xcompact3d Incompact3d

Project Site

Test Created

Last Updated

Test Maintainer

Test Type

Average Install Time

Average Run Time

Test Dependencies

Accolades

Supported Platforms

Revision History

Suites Using This Test

Performance Metrics

Xcompact3d Incompact3d 2021-03-11

Input: X3D-benchmarking input.i3d

Does It Scale Well With Increasing Cores?

Notable Instruction Set Usage

Tested CPU Architectures

Recent Test Results

Most Popular Test Results