CCTA_Bespoke_Render_ubusrv1 BD790i Run1: Processor: AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX @ 5.46GHz (16 Cores / 32 Threads), Motherboard: Shenzhen Meigao Electronic Equipment DRFXI (1.05 BIOS), Chipset: AMD Device 14d8, Memory: 94GB, Disk: 2 x Western Digital WD_BLACK SN850X 2000GB + Samsung SSD 970 PRO 512GB + 2000GB Samsung SSD 990 PRO 2TB + 1000GB Sabrent SB-RKT5-1TB + 1000GB Samsung SSD 850 + 1024GB Samsung SSD 860 + 1024GB Samsung SSD 850 + 1000GB 05SSD3, Graphics: RAPHAEL_MENDOCINO 512MB (2200/2600MHz), Audio: AMD Device 1640, Monitor: PL3266Q, Network: Realtek RTL8125 2.5GbE + Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX210/AX211/AX411 OS: Ubuntu 22.04, Kernel: 6.5.0-45-generic (x86_64), Desktop: GNOME Shell 42.9, Display Server: X Server 1.21.1.4, OpenGL: 4.6 Mesa 23.2.1-1ubuntu3.1~22.04.2 (LLVM 15.0.7 DRM 3.54), Vulkan: 1.3.255, Compiler: GCC 11.4.0, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 2560x1440 PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: GPU - Backend: Numpy - Project Size: 4194304 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better Run1 . 1.730 |================================================================= PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: GPU - Backend: Numpy - Project Size: 4194304 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better Run1 . 1.050 |================================================================= PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: GPU - Backend: Numpy - Project Size: 1048576 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better Run1 . 0.387 |================================================================= PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: GPU - Backend: Numpy - Project Size: 1048576 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better Run1 . 0.171 |================================================================= PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: Numpy - Project Size: 4194304 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better Run1 . 1.722 |================================================================= PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: Numpy - Project Size: 4194304 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better Run1 . 1.043 |================================================================= PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: Numpy - Project Size: 1048576 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better Run1 . 0.385 |================================================================= PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: Numpy - Project Size: 1048576 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better Run1 . 0.172 |================================================================= PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: GPU - Backend: Numpy - Project Size: 262144 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better Run1 . 0.085 |================================================================= PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: GPU - Backend: Numpy - Project Size: 262144 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better Run1 . 0.044 |================================================================= PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: Numpy - Project Size: 262144 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better Run1 . 0.085 |================================================================= PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: Numpy - Project Size: 262144 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better Run1 . 0.044 |================================================================= PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: GPU - Backend: Numpy - Project Size: 65536 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better Run1 . 0.021 |================================================================= PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: GPU - Backend: Numpy - Project Size: 65536 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better Run1 . 0.011 |================================================================= PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: GPU - Backend: Numpy - Project Size: 16384 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better Run1 . 0.005 |================================================================= PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: GPU - Backend: Numpy - Project Size: 16384 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better Run1 . 0.002 |================================================================= PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: Numpy - Project Size: 65536 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better Run1 . 0.020 |================================================================= PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: Numpy - Project Size: 65536 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better Run1 . 0.011 |================================================================= PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: Numpy - Project Size: 16384 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better Run1 . 0.005 |================================================================= PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: Numpy - Project Size: 16384 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better Run1 . 0.002 |================================================================= Phoronix Test Suite Self Test 1.0 Test: Peak Memory Usage MB < Lower Is Better Run1 . 2382.99 |=============================================================== Phoronix Test Suite Self Test 1.0 Test: Merge Results Seconds < Lower Is Better Run1 . 0.062 |================================================================= Phoronix Test Suite Self Test 1.0 Test: Info Command Seconds < Lower Is Better Run1 . 1.409 |================================================================= Phoronix Test Suite Self Test 1.0 Test: Render Test Seconds < Lower Is Better Run1 . 43.88 |================================================================= Phoronix Test Suite Self Test 1.0 Test: List Suites Seconds < Lower Is Better Run1 . 0.900 |================================================================= Phoronix Test Suite Self Test 1.0 Test: Total Time Seconds < Lower Is Better Run1 . 150.94 |================================================================ PyPerformance 1.11 Benchmark: pickle_pure_python Milliseconds < Lower Is Better Run1 . 236 |=================================================================== PyPerformance 1.11 Benchmark: asyncio_websockets Milliseconds < Lower Is Better Run1 . 339 |=================================================================== PyPerformance 1.11 Benchmark: django_template Milliseconds < Lower Is Better Run1 . 25.5 |================================================================== PyPerformance 1.11 Benchmark: asyncio_tcp_ssl Milliseconds < Lower Is Better Run1 . 2.18 |================================================================== PyPerformance 1.11 Benchmark: python_startup Milliseconds < Lower Is Better Run1 . 5.92 |================================================================== PyPerformance 1.11 Benchmark: regex_compile Milliseconds < Lower Is Better Run1 . 83.9 |================================================================== PyPerformance 1.11 Benchmark: async_tree_io Milliseconds < Lower Is Better Run1 . 1.27 |================================================================== PyPerformance 1.11 Benchmark: crypto_pyaes Milliseconds < Lower Is Better Run1 . 62.4 |================================================================== PyPerformance 1.11 Benchmark: json_loads Milliseconds < Lower Is Better Run1 . 12.2 |================================================================== PyPerformance 1.11 Benchmark: gc_collect Milliseconds < Lower Is Better Run1 . 715 |=================================================================== PyPerformance 1.11 Benchmark: xml_etree Milliseconds < Lower Is Better Run1 . 40.9 |================================================================== PyPerformance 1.11 Benchmark: raytrace Milliseconds < Lower Is Better Run1 . 258 |=================================================================== PyPerformance 1.11 Benchmark: pathlib Milliseconds < Lower Is Better Run1 . 15.0 |================================================================== PyPerformance 1.11 Benchmark: nbody Milliseconds < Lower Is Better Run1 . 82.0 |================================================================== PyPerformance 1.11 Benchmark: float Milliseconds < Lower Is Better Run1 . 63.3 |================================================================== PyPerformance 1.11 Benchmark: chaos Milliseconds < Lower Is Better Run1 . 55.2 |================================================================== PyPerformance 1.11 Benchmark: go Milliseconds < Lower Is Better Run1 . 129 |=================================================================== PyBench 2018-02-16 Total For Average Test Times Milliseconds < Lower Is Better Run1 . 597 |=================================================================== GNU Octave Benchmark 6.4.0 Seconds < Lower Is Better Run1 . 6.372 |================================================================= GIMP 2.10.30 Test: unsharp-mask Seconds < Lower Is Better Run1 . 18.50 |================================================================= GIMP 2.10.30 Test: auto-levels Seconds < Lower Is Better Run1 . 15.26 |================================================================= GIMP 2.10.30 Test: rotate Seconds < Lower Is Better Run1 . 14.22 |================================================================= GIMP 2.10.30 Test: resize Seconds < Lower Is Better Run1 . 18.14 |================================================================= Primesieve 12.6 Length: 1e13 Seconds < Lower Is Better Run1 . 106.83 |================================================================ Primesieve 12.6 Length: 1e12 Seconds < Lower Is Better Run1 . 8.820 |================================================================= ParaView 5.13 Test: Wavelet Contour - Frames: 3000 - Resolution: 2560 x 1440 Frames / Sec > Higher Is Better Run1 . 32.01 |================================================================= ParaView 5.13 Test: Wavelet Volume - Frames: 3000 - Resolution: 2560 x 1440 Frames / Sec > Higher Is Better Run1 . 35.28 |================================================================= ParaView 5.13 Test: Wavelet Contour - Frames: 600 - Resolution: 2560 x 1440 Frames / Sec > Higher Is Better Run1 . 32.04 |================================================================= ParaView 5.13 Test: Wavelet Volume - Frames: 600 - Resolution: 2560 x 1440 Frames / Sec > Higher Is Better Run1 . 35.33 |================================================================= ParaView 5.13 Test: Many Spheres - Frames: 3000 - Resolution: 2560 x 1440 Frames / Sec > Higher Is Better Run1 . 12.45 |================================================================= ParaView 5.13 Test: Many Spheres - Frames: 600 - Resolution: 2560 x 1440 Frames / Sec > Higher Is Better Run1 . 12.37 |================================================================= PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: GPU - Backend: TensorFlow - Project Size: 4194304 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: GPU - Backend: TensorFlow - Project Size: 4194304 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: GPU - Backend: TensorFlow - Project Size: 1048576 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: GPU - Backend: TensorFlow - Project Size: 1048576 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: TensorFlow - Project Size: 4194304 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: TensorFlow - Project Size: 4194304 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: TensorFlow - Project Size: 1048576 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: TensorFlow - Project Size: 1048576 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: GPU - Backend: TensorFlow - Project Size: 262144 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: GPU - Backend: TensorFlow - Project Size: 262144 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: TensorFlow - Project Size: 262144 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: TensorFlow - Project Size: 262144 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: GPU - Backend: TensorFlow - Project Size: 65536 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: GPU - Backend: TensorFlow - Project Size: 65536 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: GPU - Backend: TensorFlow - Project Size: 16384 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: GPU - Backend: TensorFlow - Project Size: 16384 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: TensorFlow - Project Size: 65536 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: TensorFlow - Project Size: 65536 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: TensorFlow - Project Size: 16384 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: TensorFlow - Project Size: 16384 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: GPU - Backend: PyTorch - Project Size: 4194304 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: GPU - Backend: PyTorch - Project Size: 4194304 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: GPU - Backend: PyTorch - Project Size: 1048576 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: GPU - Backend: PyTorch - Project Size: 1048576 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: PyTorch - Project Size: 4194304 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: PyTorch - Project Size: 4194304 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: PyTorch - Project Size: 1048576 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: PyTorch - Project Size: 1048576 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: GPU - Backend: PyTorch - Project Size: 262144 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: GPU - Backend: PyTorch - Project Size: 262144 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: GPU - Backend: Aesara - Project Size: 4194304 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: GPU - Backend: Aesara - Project Size: 4194304 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: GPU - Backend: Aesara - Project Size: 1048576 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: GPU - Backend: Aesara - Project Size: 1048576 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: PyTorch - Project Size: 262144 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: PyTorch - Project Size: 262144 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: Aesara - Project Size: 4194304 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: Aesara - Project Size: 4194304 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: Aesara - Project Size: 1048576 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: Aesara - Project Size: 1048576 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: GPU - Backend: PyTorch - Project Size: 65536 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: GPU - Backend: PyTorch - Project Size: 65536 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: GPU - Backend: PyTorch - Project Size: 16384 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: GPU - Backend: PyTorch - Project Size: 16384 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: GPU - Backend: Numba - Project Size: 4194304 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: GPU - Backend: Numba - Project Size: 4194304 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: GPU - Backend: Numba - Project Size: 1048576 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: GPU - Backend: Numba - Project Size: 1048576 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: GPU - Backend: Aesara - Project Size: 262144 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: GPU - Backend: Aesara - Project Size: 262144 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: PyTorch - Project Size: 65536 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: PyTorch - Project Size: 65536 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: PyTorch - Project Size: 16384 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: PyTorch - Project Size: 16384 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: Numba - Project Size: 4194304 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: Numba - Project Size: 4194304 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: Numba - Project Size: 1048576 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: Numba - Project Size: 1048576 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: Aesara - Project Size: 262144 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: Aesara - Project Size: 262144 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: GPU - Backend: Numba - Project Size: 262144 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: GPU - Backend: Numba - Project Size: 262144 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: GPU - Backend: Aesara - Project Size: 65536 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: GPU - Backend: Aesara - Project Size: 65536 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: GPU - Backend: Aesara - Project Size: 16384 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: GPU - Backend: Aesara - Project Size: 16384 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: Numba - Project Size: 262144 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: Numba - Project Size: 262144 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: Aesara - Project Size: 65536 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: Aesara - Project Size: 65536 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: Aesara - Project Size: 16384 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: Aesara - Project Size: 16384 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: GPU - Backend: Numba - Project Size: 65536 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: GPU - Backend: Numba - Project Size: 65536 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: GPU - Backend: Numba - Project Size: 16384 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: GPU - Backend: Numba - Project Size: 16384 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: GPU - Backend: JAX - Project Size: 4194304 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: GPU - Backend: JAX - Project Size: 4194304 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: GPU - Backend: JAX - Project Size: 1048576 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: GPU - Backend: JAX - Project Size: 1048576 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: Numba - Project Size: 65536 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: Numba - Project Size: 65536 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: Numba - Project Size: 16384 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: Numba - Project Size: 16384 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: JAX - Project Size: 4194304 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: JAX - Project Size: 4194304 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: JAX - Project Size: 1048576 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: JAX - Project Size: 1048576 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: GPU - Backend: JAX - Project Size: 262144 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: GPU - Backend: JAX - Project Size: 262144 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: JAX - Project Size: 262144 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: JAX - Project Size: 262144 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: GPU - Backend: JAX - Project Size: 65536 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: GPU - Backend: JAX - Project Size: 65536 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: GPU - Backend: JAX - Project Size: 16384 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: GPU - Backend: JAX - Project Size: 16384 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: JAX - Project Size: 65536 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: JAX - Project Size: 65536 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: JAX - Project Size: 16384 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: JAX - Project Size: 16384 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better Phoronix Test Suite Self Test 1.0 Test: Refresh Graphs Seconds < Lower Is Better PyMongo Inserts Seconds < Lower Is Better Java 2D Microbenchmark 1.0 Rendering Test: Vector Graphics Rendering Units Per Second > Higher Is Better Java 2D Microbenchmark 1.0 Rendering Test: All Rendering Tests Units Per Second > Higher Is Better Java 2D Microbenchmark 1.0 Rendering Test: Image Rendering Units Per Second > Higher Is Better Java 2D Microbenchmark 1.0 Rendering Test: Text Rendering Units Per Second > Higher Is Better ParaView 5.13 Test: Wavelet Contour - Frames: 3000 - Resolution: 2560 x 1440 MiPolys / Sec > Higher Is Better Run1 . 333.52 |================================================================ ParaView 5.13 Test: Wavelet Volume - Frames: 3000 - Resolution: 2560 x 1440 MiVoxels / Sec > Higher Is Better Run1 . 564.41 |================================================================ ParaView 5.13 Test: Wavelet Contour - Frames: 600 - Resolution: 2560 x 1440 MiPolys / Sec > Higher Is Better Run1 . 333.92 |================================================================ ParaView 5.13 Test: Wavelet Volume - Frames: 600 - Resolution: 2560 x 1440 MiVoxels / Sec > Higher Is Better Run1 . 565.18 |================================================================ ParaView 5.13 Test: Many Spheres - Frames: 3000 - Resolution: 2560 x 1440 MiPolys / Sec > Higher Is Better Run1 . 1247.89 |=============================================================== ParaView 5.13 Test: Many Spheres - Frames: 600 - Resolution: 2560 x 1440 MiPolys / Sec > Higher Is Better Run1 . 1239.77 |=============================================================== OpenArena 0.8.8 Resolution: 2560 x 1440 Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better Dota 2 Resolution: 2560 x 1440 - Renderer: Vulkan Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better