intelhpibenchbasis
Intel Xeon D-2796TE testing with a Kontron COMh-sdID E2 v1.0.0 (SDIDR112 BIOS) and NVIDIA AD104GL [RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation] 20GB on Debian 12 via the Phoronix Test Suite.


Intel Xeon D-2796TE: 

	Processor: Intel Xeon D-2796TE @ 3.10GHz (20 Cores / 40 Threads), Motherboard: Kontron COMh-sdID E2 v1.0.0 (SDIDR112 BIOS), Chipset: Intel Ice Lake IEH, Memory: 4 x 64GB DDR4-2933MT/s, Disk: Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 500GB, Graphics: NVIDIA AD104GL [RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation] 20GB, Audio: NVIDIA AD104 HD Audio, Network: Intel I226-IT + 4 x Intel E823-C for backplane

	OS: Debian 12, Kernel: 6.1.0-27-amd64 (x86_64), Display Server: X Server, Display Driver: NVIDIA, OpenCL: OpenCL 3.0 CUDA 12.7.33, Compiler: GCC 12.2.0 + CUDA 12.6, File-System: btrfs


Timed MrBayes Analysis 3.2.7
Primate Phylogeny Analysis
Seconds < Lower Is Better
Intel Xeon D-2796TE . 167.58 |=================================================


GROMACS 2024
Implementation: NVIDIA CUDA GPU - Input: water_GMX50_bare
Ns Per Day > Higher Is Better
Intel Xeon D-2796TE . 10.67 |==================================================


GROMACS 2024
Implementation: MPI CPU - Input: water_GMX50_bare
Ns Per Day > Higher Is Better


QMCPACK 3.17.1
Input: simple-H2O
Total Execution Time - Seconds < Lower Is Better


QMCPACK 3.17.1
Input: LiH_ae_MSD
Total Execution Time - Seconds < Lower Is Better


QMCPACK 3.17.1
Input: H4_ae
Total Execution Time - Seconds < Lower Is Better


QMCPACK 3.17.1
Input: FeCO6_b3lyp_gms
Total Execution Time - Seconds < Lower Is Better


QMCPACK 3.17.1
Input: O_ae_pyscf_UHF
Total Execution Time - Seconds < Lower Is Better


QMCPACK 3.17.1
Input: Li2_STO_ae
Total Execution Time - Seconds < Lower Is Better


Open FMM Nero2D 2.0.2

Seconds < Lower Is Better


GPAW 23.6
Input: Carbon Nanotube
Seconds < Lower Is Better


Monte Carlo Simulations of Ionised Nebulae 2.02.73.3
Input: Gas HII40
Seconds < Lower Is Better


High Performance Conjugate Gradient 3.1
X Y Z: 104 104 104 - RT: 60
GFLOP/s > Higher Is Better


Xcompact3d Incompact3d 2021-03-11
Input: input.i3d 129 Cells Per Direction
Seconds < Lower Is Better


LAMMPS Molecular Dynamics Simulator 23Jun2022
Model: 20k Atoms
ns/day > Higher Is Better


High Performance Conjugate Gradient 3.1
X Y Z: 192 192 192 - RT: 1800
GFLOP/s > Higher Is Better


ASKAP 1.0
Test: tConvolve MPI
Million Grid Points Per Second > Higher Is Better


High Performance Conjugate Gradient 3.1
X Y Z: 160 160 160 - RT: 60
GFLOP/s > Higher Is Better


Xcompact3d Incompact3d 2021-03-11
Input: X3D-benchmarking input.i3d
Seconds < Lower Is Better


Monte Carlo Simulations of Ionised Nebulae 2.02.73.3
Input: Dust 2D tau100.0
Seconds < Lower Is Better


NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4
Test / Class: EP.C
Total Mop/s > Higher Is Better


High Performance Conjugate Gradient 3.1
X Y Z: 104 104 104 - RT: 1800
GFLOP/s > Higher Is Better


High Performance Conjugate Gradient 3.1
X Y Z: 192 192 192 - RT: 60
GFLOP/s > Higher Is Better


High Performance Conjugate Gradient 3.1
X Y Z: 144 144 144 - RT: 1800
GFLOP/s > Higher Is Better


Pennant 1.0.1
Test: leblancbig
Hydro Cycle Time - Seconds < Lower Is Better


Xcompact3d Incompact3d 2021-03-11
Input: input.i3d 193 Cells Per Direction
Seconds < Lower Is Better


LAMMPS Molecular Dynamics Simulator 23Jun2022
Model: Rhodopsin Protein
ns/day > Higher Is Better


Pennant 1.0.1
Test: sedovbig
Hydro Cycle Time - Seconds < Lower Is Better


High Performance Conjugate Gradient 3.1
X Y Z: 144 144 144 - RT: 60
GFLOP/s > Higher Is Better


Intel MPI Benchmarks 2019.3
Test: IMB-P2P PingPong
Mbytes/sec > Higher Is Better


Intel MPI Benchmarks 2019.3
Test: IMB-MPI1 Sendrecv
Mbytes/sec > Higher Is Better


High Performance Conjugate Gradient 3.1
X Y Z: 160 160 160 - RT: 1800
GFLOP/s > Higher Is Better


Intel MPI Benchmarks 2019.3
Test: IMB-MPI1 Exchange
Mbytes/sec > Higher Is Better


NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4
Test / Class: EP.D
Total Mop/s > Higher Is Better


Intel MPI Benchmarks 2019.3
Test: IMB-MPI1 PingPong
Mbytes/sec > Higher Is Better


miniFE 2.2
Problem Size: Small
CG Mflops > Higher Is Better


NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4
Test / Class: MG.C
Total Mop/s > Higher Is Better


NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4
Test / Class: LU.C
Total Mop/s > Higher Is Better


NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4
Test / Class: IS.D
Total Mop/s > Higher Is Better


NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4
Test / Class: FT.C
Total Mop/s > Higher Is Better


NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4
Test / Class: CG.C
Total Mop/s > Higher Is Better


NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4
Test / Class: SP.C
Total Mop/s > Higher Is Better


NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4
Test / Class: SP.B
Total Mop/s > Higher Is Better


NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4
Test / Class: BT.C
Total Mop/s > Higher Is Better


HPC Challenge 1.5.0
Test / Class: G-HPL


HPC Challenge 1.5.0
Test / Class: Max Ping Pong Bandwidth


HPC Challenge 1.5.0
Test / Class: Random Ring Bandwidth


HPC Challenge 1.5.0
Test / Class: Random Ring Latency


HPC Challenge 1.5.0
Test / Class: G-Random Access


HPC Challenge 1.5.0
Test / Class: EP-STREAM Triad


HPC Challenge 1.5.0
Test / Class: G-Ptrans


HPC Challenge 1.5.0
Test / Class: EP-DGEMM


HPC Challenge 1.5.0
Test / Class: G-Ffte