c6i-12xlarge-amazon-linux-2023 amazon testing on Amazon Linux 2023.6.20241111 via the Phoronix Test Suite. 1 x 96 GB DDR4-3200MT: Processor: Intel Xeon Platinum 8375C (24 Cores / 48 Threads), Motherboard: Amazon EC2 c6i.12xlarge (1.0 BIOS), Chipset: Intel 440FX 82441FX PMC, Memory: 1 x 96 GB DDR4-3200MT/s, Disk: 107GB Amazon Elastic Block Store, Network: Amazon Elastic OS: Amazon Linux 2023.6.20241111, Kernel: 6.1.115-126.197.amzn2023.x86_64 (x86_64), Compiler: GCC 11.4.1 20230605, File-System: xfs, System Layer: amazon Stream 2013-01-17 Type: Copy MB/s > Higher Is Better 1 x 96 GB DDR4-3200MT . 153186.4 |============================================= Stream 2013-01-17 Type: Scale MB/s > Higher Is Better 1 x 96 GB DDR4-3200MT . 135536.5 |============================================= Stream 2013-01-17 Type: Triad MB/s > Higher Is Better 1 x 96 GB DDR4-3200MT . 144694.0 |============================================= Stream 2013-01-17 Type: Add MB/s > Higher Is Better 1 x 96 GB DDR4-3200MT . 144799.2 |============================================= MBW 2018-09-08 Test: Memory Copy - Array Size: 128 MiB MiB/s > Higher Is Better 1 x 96 GB DDR4-3200MT . 11991.27 |============================================= MBW 2018-09-08 Test: Memory Copy - Array Size: 512 MiB MiB/s > Higher Is Better 1 x 96 GB DDR4-3200MT . 13061.98 |============================================= MBW 2018-09-08 Test: Memory Copy - Array Size: 1024 MiB MiB/s > Higher Is Better 1 x 96 GB DDR4-3200MT . 12893.31 |============================================= MBW 2018-09-08 Test: Memory Copy - Array Size: 4096 MiB MiB/s > Higher Is Better 1 x 96 GB DDR4-3200MT . 13131.47 |============================================= MBW 2018-09-08 Test: Memory Copy - Array Size: 8192 MiB MiB/s > Higher Is Better 1 x 96 GB DDR4-3200MT . 13137.77 |============================================= MBW 2018-09-08 Test: Memory Copy, Fixed Block Size - Array Size: 128 MiB MiB/s > Higher Is Better 1 x 96 GB DDR4-3200MT . 6879.54 |============================================== MBW 2018-09-08 Test: Memory Copy, Fixed Block Size - Array Size: 512 MiB MiB/s > Higher Is Better 1 x 96 GB DDR4-3200MT . 6695.41 |============================================== MBW 2018-09-08 Test: Memory Copy, Fixed Block Size - Array Size: 1024 MiB MiB/s > Higher Is Better 1 x 96 GB DDR4-3200MT . 6680.32 |============================================== MBW 2018-09-08 Test: Memory Copy, Fixed Block Size - Array Size: 4096 MiB MiB/s > Higher Is Better 1 x 96 GB DDR4-3200MT . 6683.13 |============================================== MBW 2018-09-08 Test: Memory Copy, Fixed Block Size - Array Size: 8192 MiB MiB/s > Higher Is Better 1 x 96 GB DDR4-3200MT . 6687.35 |============================================== pmbench Concurrent Worker Threads: 1 - Read-Write Ratio: 50% us - Average Page Latency < Lower Is Better 1 x 96 GB DDR4-3200MT . 0.0941 |=============================================== pmbench Concurrent Worker Threads: 2 - Read-Write Ratio: 50% us - Average Page Latency < Lower Is Better 1 x 96 GB DDR4-3200MT . 0.0911 |=============================================== pmbench Concurrent Worker Threads: 4 - Read-Write Ratio: 50% us - Average Page Latency < Lower Is Better 1 x 96 GB DDR4-3200MT . 0.0870 |=============================================== pmbench Concurrent Worker Threads: 8 - Read-Write Ratio: 50% us - Average Page Latency < Lower Is Better 1 x 96 GB DDR4-3200MT . 0.0851 |=============================================== pmbench Concurrent Worker Threads: 16 - Read-Write Ratio: 50% us - Average Page Latency < Lower Is Better 1 x 96 GB DDR4-3200MT . 0.0824 |=============================================== pmbench Concurrent Worker Threads: 32 - Read-Write Ratio: 50% us - Average Page Latency < Lower Is Better 1 x 96 GB DDR4-3200MT . 0.0919 |=============================================== pmbench Concurrent Worker Threads: 48 - Read-Write Ratio: 50% us - Average Page Latency < Lower Is Better 1 x 96 GB DDR4-3200MT . 0.0926 |=============================================== pmbench Concurrent Worker Threads: 1 - Read-Write Ratio: 100% Reads us - Average Page Latency < Lower Is Better 1 x 96 GB DDR4-3200MT . 0.046 |================================================ pmbench Concurrent Worker Threads: 2 - Read-Write Ratio: 100% Reads us - Average Page Latency < Lower Is Better 1 x 96 GB DDR4-3200MT . 0.0464 |=============================================== pmbench Concurrent Worker Threads: 4 - Read-Write Ratio: 100% Reads us - Average Page Latency < Lower Is Better 1 x 96 GB DDR4-3200MT . 0.0461 |=============================================== pmbench Concurrent Worker Threads: 8 - Read-Write Ratio: 100% Reads us - Average Page Latency < Lower Is Better 1 x 96 GB DDR4-3200MT . 0.0460 |=============================================== pmbench Concurrent Worker Threads: 1 - Read-Write Ratio: 100% Writes us - Average Page Latency < Lower Is Better 1 x 96 GB DDR4-3200MT . 0.0504 |=============================================== pmbench Concurrent Worker Threads: 16 - Read-Write Ratio: 100% Reads us - Average Page Latency < Lower Is Better 1 x 96 GB DDR4-3200MT . 0.046 |================================================ pmbench Concurrent Worker Threads: 2 - Read-Write Ratio: 100% Writes us - Average Page Latency < Lower Is Better 1 x 96 GB DDR4-3200MT . 0.0506 |=============================================== pmbench Concurrent Worker Threads: 32 - Read-Write Ratio: 100% Reads us - Average Page Latency < Lower Is Better 1 x 96 GB DDR4-3200MT . 0.0565 |=============================================== pmbench Concurrent Worker Threads: 4 - Read-Write Ratio: 100% Writes us - Average Page Latency < Lower Is Better 1 x 96 GB DDR4-3200MT . 0.05 |================================================= pmbench Concurrent Worker Threads: 48 - Read-Write Ratio: 100% Reads us - Average Page Latency < Lower Is Better 1 x 96 GB DDR4-3200MT . 0.0565 |=============================================== pmbench Concurrent Worker Threads: 8 - Read-Write Ratio: 100% Writes us - Average Page Latency < Lower Is Better 1 x 96 GB DDR4-3200MT . 0.0500 |=============================================== pmbench Concurrent Worker Threads: 16 - Read-Write Ratio: 100% Writes us - Average Page Latency < Lower Is Better 1 x 96 GB DDR4-3200MT . 0.0499 |=============================================== pmbench Concurrent Worker Threads: 32 - Read-Write Ratio: 100% Writes us - Average Page Latency < Lower Is Better 1 x 96 GB DDR4-3200MT . 0.0629 |=============================================== pmbench Concurrent Worker Threads: 48 - Read-Write Ratio: 100% Writes us - Average Page Latency < Lower Is Better 1 x 96 GB DDR4-3200MT . 0.0639 |=============================================== pmbench Concurrent Worker Threads: 1 - Read-Write Ratio: 80% Reads 20% Writes us - Average Page Latency < Lower Is Better 1 x 96 GB DDR4-3200MT . 0.1216 |=============================================== pmbench Concurrent Worker Threads: 2 - Read-Write Ratio: 80% Reads 20% Writes us - Average Page Latency < Lower Is Better 1 x 96 GB DDR4-3200MT . 0.1195 |=============================================== pmbench Concurrent Worker Threads: 4 - Read-Write Ratio: 80% Reads 20% Writes us - Average Page Latency < Lower Is Better 1 x 96 GB DDR4-3200MT . 0.1124 |=============================================== pmbench Concurrent Worker Threads: 8 - Read-Write Ratio: 80% Reads 20% Writes us - Average Page Latency < Lower Is Better 1 x 96 GB DDR4-3200MT . 0.1065 |=============================================== pmbench Concurrent Worker Threads: 16 - Read-Write Ratio: 80% Reads 20% Writes us - Average Page Latency < Lower Is Better 1 x 96 GB DDR4-3200MT . 0.1049 |=============================================== pmbench Concurrent Worker Threads: 32 - Read-Write Ratio: 80% Reads 20% Writes us - Average Page Latency < Lower Is Better 1 x 96 GB DDR4-3200MT . 0.1078 |=============================================== pmbench Concurrent Worker Threads: 48 - Read-Write Ratio: 80% Reads 20% Writes us - Average Page Latency < Lower Is Better 1 x 96 GB DDR4-3200MT . 0.1084 |=============================================== CacheBench Test: Read MB/s > Higher Is Better 1 x 96 GB DDR4-3200MT . 6657.89 |============================================== CacheBench Test: Write MB/s > Higher Is Better 1 x 96 GB DDR4-3200MT . 47916.29 |============================================= CacheBench Test: Read / Modify / Write MB/s > Higher Is Better 1 x 96 GB DDR4-3200MT . 85970.28 |============================================= Sysbench 1.0.20 Test: RAM / Memory MiB/sec > Higher Is Better 1 x 96 GB DDR4-3200MT . 19070.51 |============================================= Sysbench 1.0.20 Test: CPU Events Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 x 96 GB DDR4-3200MT . 75191.18 |=============================================