test lxc testing on Debian GNU/Linux 12 via the Phoronix Test Suite. r1: Processor: 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 @ 3.30GHz (28 Cores / 52 Threads), Motherboard: Dell PowerEdge R630 02C2CP (2.19.0 BIOS), Memory: 98GB, Disk: 1000GB TOSHIBA MQ01ABD1, Graphics: mgag200drmfb OS: Debian GNU/Linux 12, Kernel: 6.8.12-3-pve (x86_64), Compiler: GCC 12.2.0, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 1600x1200, System Layer: lxc 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4: Processor: 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 @ 3.30GHz (28 Cores / 52 Threads), Motherboard: Dell PowerEdge R630 02C2CP (2.19.0 BIOS), Memory: 98GB, Disk: 1000GB TOSHIBA MQ01ABD1, Graphics: mgag200drmfb OS: Debian GNU/Linux 12, Kernel: 6.8.12-3-pve (x86_64), Compiler: GCC 12.2.0, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 1600x1200, System Layer: lxc 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 - mgag200drmfb - Dell: Processor: 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 @ 3.30GHz (28 Cores / 56 Threads), Motherboard: Dell PowerEdge R630 02C2CP (2.19.0 BIOS), Memory: 98GB, Disk: 1000GB TOSHIBA MQ01ABD1, Graphics: mgag200drmfb OS: Debian GNU/Linux 12, Kernel: 6.8.12-3-pve (x86_64), Compiler: GCC 12.2.0, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 1600x1200, System Layer: lxc CacheBench Test: Read MB/s > Higher Is Better r1 . 8361.63 |================================================================= CacheBench Test: Write MB/s > Higher Is Better r1 . 36891.33 |================================================================ CacheBench Test: Read / Modify / Write MB/s > Higher Is Better r1 . 65744.18 |================================================================ NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4 Test / Class: EP.C Total Mop/s > Higher Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 . 2736.22 |========================================== NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4 Test / Class: LU.C Total Mop/s > Higher Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 . 46814.61 |========================================= Rodinia 3.1 Test: OpenMP LavaMD Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 . 133.48 |=========================================== CP2K Molecular Dynamics 2024.3 Fayalite-FIST Data Seconds < Lower Is Better NAMD 3.0 ATPase Simulation - 327,506 Atoms ns/day > Higher Is Better DaCapo Benchmark 23.11 Java Test: Jython msec < Lower Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 . 8144 |============================================= DaCapo Benchmark 23.11 Java Test: Tradebeans msec < Lower Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 . 19157 |============================================ Renaissance 0.14 Test: Scala Dotty ms < Lower Is Better Renaissance 0.14 Test: Savina Reactors.IO ms < Lower Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 . 11385.6 |========================================== Renaissance 0.14 Test: Apache Spark PageRank ms < Lower Is Better John The Ripper 2023.03.14 Test: Blowfish Real C/S > Higher Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 . 30661 |============================================ SVT-AV1 2.3 1080p 8-bit YUV To AV1 Video Encode Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better SVT-HEVC 1.5.0 1080p 8-bit YUV To HEVC Video Encode Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better SVT-VP9 0.3 1080p 8-bit YUV To VP9 Video Encode Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better x264 2022-02-22 H.264 Video Encoding Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better Himeno Benchmark 3.0 Poisson Pressure Solver MFLOPS > Higher Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 . 3324.24 |========================================== 7-Zip Compression 24.05 Test: Compression Rating MIPS > Higher Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 . 137422 |=========================================== 7-Zip Compression 24.05 Test: Decompression Rating MIPS > Higher Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 . 122760 |=========================================== Stockfish 17 Total Time Nodes Per Second > Higher Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 . 43261094 |========================================= asmFish 2018-07-23 1024 Hash Memory, 26 Depth Nodes/second > Higher Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 . 62366573 |========================================= Timed GCC Compilation 13.2 Time To Compile Seconds < Lower Is Better Timed Linux Kernel Compilation 6.8 Time To Compile Seconds < Lower Is Better Timed LLVM Compilation 16.0 Time To Compile Seconds < Lower Is Better Timed PHP Compilation 8.3.4 Time To Compile Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 . 78.38 |============================================ C-Ray 2.0 Total Time - 4K, 16 Rays Per Pixel Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 . 0.618 |============================================ POV-Ray 3.7.0.7 Trace Time Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 . 23.76 |============================================ Rust Mandelbrot Time To Complete Serial/Parallel Mandelbrot Seconds < Lower Is Better oneDNN 3.6 Harness: Deconvolution Batch deconv_1d - Data Type: f32 ms < Lower Is Better oneDNN 3.6 Harness: Convolution Batch conv_alexnet - Data Type: f32 ms < Lower Is Better oneDNN 3.6 Harness: Convolution Batch conv_googlenet_v3 - Data Type: f32 ms < Lower Is Better Cython Benchmark 0.29.21 Test: N-Queens Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 . 32.49 |============================================ Hackbench Count: 32 - Type: Process Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 . 57.43 |============================================ m-queens 1.2 Time To Solve Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 . 36.86 |============================================ Radiance Benchmark 5.0 Test: Serial Seconds < Lower Is Better Radiance Benchmark 5.0 Test: SMP Parallel Seconds < Lower Is Better ctx_clock Context Switch Time Clocks < Lower Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 . 1063 |============================================= PyBench 2018-02-16 Total For Average Test Times Milliseconds < Lower Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 . 1161 |============================================= LeelaChessZero 0.31.1 Backend: BLAS Nodes Per Second > Higher Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 . 65 |=============================================== LeelaChessZero 0.31.1 Backend: Eigen Nodes Per Second > Higher Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 . 54 |=============================================== miniBUDE 20210901 Implementation: OpenMP - Input Deck: BM1 GFInst/s > Higher Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 . 487.66 |=========================================== miniBUDE 20210901 Implementation: OpenMP - Input Deck: BM1 Billion Interactions/s > Higher Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 . 19.51 |============================================ miniBUDE 20210901 Implementation: OpenMP - Input Deck: BM2 GFInst/s > Higher Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 . 515.58 |=========================================== miniBUDE 20210901 Implementation: OpenMP - Input Deck: BM2 Billion Interactions/s > Higher Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 . 20.62 |============================================ Rodinia 3.1 Test: OpenMP HotSpot3D Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 . 141.43 |=========================================== Rodinia 3.1 Test: OpenMP Leukocyte Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 . 66.19 |============================================ Rodinia 3.1 Test: OpenMP CFD Solver Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 . 11.16 |============================================ Rodinia 3.1 Test: OpenMP Streamcluster Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 . 13.75 |============================================ CLOMP 1.2 Static OMP Speedup Speedup > Higher Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 . 25.6 |============================================= NAMD 3.0 Input: ATPase with 327,506 Atoms ns/day > Higher Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 . 1.09268 |========================================== NAMD 3.0 Input: STMV with 1,066,628 Atoms ns/day > Higher Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 . 0.32870 |========================================== QuantLib 1.35-dev Size: S tasks/s > Higher Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 . 10.44 |============================================ QuantLib 1.35-dev Size: XXS tasks/s > Higher Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 . 10.95 |============================================ Algebraic Multi-Grid Benchmark 1.2 Figure Of Merit > Higher Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 . 702647233 |======================================== Pennant 1.0.1 Test: sedovbig Hydro Cycle Time - Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 . 38.22 |============================================ Pennant 1.0.1 Test: leblancbig Hydro Cycle Time - Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 . 21.82 |============================================ Xcompact3d Incompact3d 2021-03-11 Input: X3D-benchmarking input.i3d Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 . 1163.96 |========================================== Xcompact3d Incompact3d 2021-03-11 Input: input.i3d 129 Cells Per Direction Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 . 10.65 |============================================ Xcompact3d Incompact3d 2021-03-11 Input: input.i3d 193 Cells Per Direction Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 . 46.69 |============================================ OpenFOAM 10 Input: drivaerFastback, Small Mesh Size Seconds < Lower Is Better OpenRadioss 2023.09.15 Model: Bumper Beam Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 . 143.24 |=========================================== OpenRadioss 2023.09.15 Model: Ford Taurus 10M Seconds < Lower Is Better OpenRadioss 2023.09.15 Model: Chrysler Neon 1M Seconds < Lower Is Better OpenRadioss 2023.09.15 Model: Cell Phone Drop Test Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 . 75.12 |============================================ OpenRadioss 2023.09.15 Model: Bird Strike on Windshield Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 . 230.48 |=========================================== OpenFOAM 10 Input: motorBike Seconds < Lower Is Better Aircrack-ng 1.7 k/s > Higher Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 . 72471.82 |========================================= Hashcat 6.2.4 Benchmark: MD5 H/s > Higher Is Better AOM AV1 3.9 Encoder Mode: Speed 0 Two-Pass - Input: Bosphorus 4K Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 . 0.21 |============================================= AOM AV1 3.9 Encoder Mode: Speed 4 Two-Pass - Input: Bosphorus 4K Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 . 5.36 |============================================= AOM AV1 3.9 Encoder Mode: Speed 6 Realtime - Input: Bosphorus 4K Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 . 31.26 |============================================ AOM AV1 3.9 Encoder Mode: Speed 6 Two-Pass - Input: Bosphorus 4K Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 . 12.00 |============================================ AOM AV1 3.9 Encoder Mode: Speed 8 Realtime - Input: Bosphorus 4K Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 . 29.29 |============================================ AOM AV1 3.9 Encoder Mode: Speed 9 Realtime - Input: Bosphorus 4K Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 . 31.83 |============================================ AOM AV1 3.9 Encoder Mode: Speed 10 Realtime - Input: Bosphorus 4K Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 . 32.85 |============================================ AOM AV1 3.9 Encoder Mode: Speed 11 Realtime - Input: Bosphorus 4K Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 . 32.91 |============================================ AOM AV1 3.9 Encoder Mode: Speed 0 Two-Pass - Input: Bosphorus 1080p Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 . 0.65 |============================================= AOM AV1 3.9 Encoder Mode: Speed 4 Two-Pass - Input: Bosphorus 1080p Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 . 11.71 |============================================ AOM AV1 3.9 Encoder Mode: Speed 6 Realtime - Input: Bosphorus 1080p Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 . 65.12 |============================================ AOM AV1 3.9 Encoder Mode: Speed 6 Two-Pass - Input: Bosphorus 1080p Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 . 31.70 |============================================ AOM AV1 3.9 Encoder Mode: Speed 8 Realtime - Input: Bosphorus 1080p Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 . 66.04 |============================================ AOM AV1 3.9 Encoder Mode: Speed 9 Realtime - Input: Bosphorus 1080p Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 . 69.78 |============================================ AOM AV1 3.9 Encoder Mode: Speed 10 Realtime - Input: Bosphorus 1080p Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 . 71.48 |============================================ AOM AV1 3.9 Encoder Mode: Speed 11 Realtime - Input: Bosphorus 1080p Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 . 71.63 |============================================