lxc testing on Debian GNU/Linux 12 via the Phoronix Test Suite.
Compare your own system(s) to this result file with the
Phoronix Test Suite by running the command:
phoronix-test-suite benchmark 2411063-NE-TEST3997290
test,
"7-Zip Compression 24.05 - Test: Compression Rating",
Higher Results Are Better
"2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4",137332,135902,139031
"7-Zip Compression 24.05 - Test: Decompression Rating",
Higher Results Are Better
"2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4",122855,122803,122623
"Aircrack-ng 1.7 - ",
Higher Results Are Better
"2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4",72280.961,72602.07,72532.414
"Algebraic Multi-Grid Benchmark 1.2 - ",
Higher Results Are Better
"2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4",708658000,702227200,697056500
"AOM AV1 3.9 - Encoder Mode: Speed 0 Two-Pass - Input: Bosphorus 4K",
Higher Results Are Better
"2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4",0.21,0.21,0.21
"AOM AV1 3.9 - Encoder Mode: Speed 4 Two-Pass - Input: Bosphorus 4K",
Higher Results Are Better
"2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4",5.33,5.32,5.42
"AOM AV1 3.9 - Encoder Mode: Speed 6 Realtime - Input: Bosphorus 4K",
Higher Results Are Better
"2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4",32.71,30.4,29.62,31.57,31.1,30.25,31.41,32.02,31.82,31.02,31.71,31.79,29.47,31.8,32.15
"AOM AV1 3.9 - Encoder Mode: Speed 6 Two-Pass - Input: Bosphorus 4K",
Higher Results Are Better
"2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4",12,11.93,12.08
"AOM AV1 3.9 - Encoder Mode: Speed 8 Realtime - Input: Bosphorus 4K",
Higher Results Are Better
"2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4",28.9,29.5,29.46
"AOM AV1 3.9 - Encoder Mode: Speed 9 Realtime - Input: Bosphorus 4K",
Higher Results Are Better
"2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4",32.05,32.22,31.22
"AOM AV1 3.9 - Encoder Mode: Speed 10 Realtime - Input: Bosphorus 4K",
Higher Results Are Better
"2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4",33.41,32.23,32.92
"AOM AV1 3.9 - Encoder Mode: Speed 11 Realtime - Input: Bosphorus 4K",
Higher Results Are Better
"2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4",33.07,33,32.65
"AOM AV1 3.9 - Encoder Mode: Speed 0 Two-Pass - Input: Bosphorus 1080p",
Higher Results Are Better
"2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4",0.65,0.64,0.66
"AOM AV1 3.9 - Encoder Mode: Speed 4 Two-Pass - Input: Bosphorus 1080p",
Higher Results Are Better
"2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4",11.64,11.61,11.87
"AOM AV1 3.9 - Encoder Mode: Speed 6 Realtime - Input: Bosphorus 1080p",
Higher Results Are Better
"2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4",66.38,64.41,69.21,64.92,63.81,64.79,64.21,66.85,64.59,64.6,61.89,62.18,66.4,65.12,67.48
"AOM AV1 3.9 - Encoder Mode: Speed 6 Two-Pass - Input: Bosphorus 1080p",
Higher Results Are Better
"2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4",30.89,34.49,31.86,33.74,31.12,31,31.52,31.22,31.14,31.79,30.91,30.82,32.33,31.85,30.79
"AOM AV1 3.9 - Encoder Mode: Speed 8 Realtime - Input: Bosphorus 1080p",
Higher Results Are Better
"2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4",70.65,66.3,66.61,61.1,64.85,61.89,59.59,66.57,69.91,67.18,68.57,65.13,68.27,64.07,69.85
"AOM AV1 3.9 - Encoder Mode: Speed 9 Realtime - Input: Bosphorus 1080p",
Higher Results Are Better
"2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4",73.55,72.12,64.14,62.97,68.54,72.73,71.67,74.3,65.93,67.85,75.48,75.36,68.83,63.31,69.87
"AOM AV1 3.9 - Encoder Mode: Speed 10 Realtime - Input: Bosphorus 1080p",
Higher Results Are Better
"2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4",67.35,74.84,70.75,68.21,71.47,73.11,71.95,73.19,65.39,73.97,74.01,73.05,73.2,73.96,67.79
"AOM AV1 3.9 - Encoder Mode: Speed 11 Realtime - Input: Bosphorus 1080p",
Higher Results Are Better
"2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4",65.72,73.64,69.82,73.59,74.26,71.45,70.23,67.05,73.11,68.87,68.52,75.81,74.46,72.52,75.34
"asmFish 2018-07-23 - 1024 Hash Memory, 26 Depth",
Higher Results Are Better
"2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4",61763577,62368860,62967281
"Blender 4.2 - Blend File: BMW27 - Compute: CPU-Only",
Lower Results Are Better
"2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4",71.98,71.88,72.88
"Blender 4.2 - Blend File: Junkshop - Compute: CPU-Only",
Lower Results Are Better
"2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4",98.99,99.14,99.52
"Blender 4.2 - Blend File: Classroom - Compute: CPU-Only",
Lower Results Are Better
"2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4",212.36,222.59,213.18,213.1
"Blender 4.2 - Blend File: Fishy Cat - Compute: CPU-Only",
Lower Results Are Better
"2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4",105.11,106.06,106.1
"Blender 4.2 - Blend File: Barbershop - Compute: CPU-Only",
Lower Results Are Better
"2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4",737.81,735.2,736.32
"Blender 4.2 - Blend File: Pabellon Barcelona - Compute: CPU-Only",
Lower Results Are Better
"2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4",233.29,233.1,234.03
"C-Ray 2.0 - Total Time - 4K, 16 Rays Per Pixel",
Lower Results Are Better
"2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4",0.616,0.611,0.628
"CacheBench - Test: Read",
Higher Results Are Better
"r1",8361.608765,8361.693986,8361.582865
"CacheBench - Test: Write",
Higher Results Are Better
"r1",37489.704841,35543.900085,37482.007143,37485.449797,36455.586673
"CacheBench - Test: Read / Modify / Write",
Higher Results Are Better
"r1",65704.616743,66017.81921,65510.093814
"CLOMP 1.2 - Static OMP Speedup",
Higher Results Are Better
"2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4",23.9,26.4,24.4,26.7,25.8,26.5,25.4,26.4,23.3,26.8,26,26.6,25.7,24.3,25.7
"CP2K Molecular Dynamics 2024.3 - Fayalite-FIST Data",
Lower Results Are Better
"2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4",
"ctx_clock - Context Switch Time",
Lower Results Are Better
"2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4",1062,1064,1062
"Cython Benchmark 0.29.21 - Test: N-Queens",
Lower Results Are Better
"2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4",32.285,32.259,32.916
"DaCapo Benchmark 23.11 - Java Test: Jython",
Lower Results Are Better
"2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4",8207,8052,8173
"DaCapo Benchmark 23.11 - Java Test: Tradebeans",
Lower Results Are Better
"2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4",19522,19036,18914
"Hackbench - Count: 32 - Type: Process",
Lower Results Are Better
"2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4",57.304,57.542,57.455
"Hashcat 6.2.4 - Benchmark: MD5",
Higher Results Are Better
"2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 - mgag200drmfb - Dell",
"Himeno Benchmark 3.0 - Poisson Pressure Solver",
Higher Results Are Better
"2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4",3327.755694,3332.954989,3312.005938
"John The Ripper 2023.03.14 - Test: Blowfish",
Higher Results Are Better
"2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4",30784,30555,30643
"LeelaChessZero 0.31.1 - Backend: BLAS",
Higher Results Are Better
"2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4",70,68,64,63,63,69,60,63,62
"LeelaChessZero 0.31.1 - Backend: Eigen",
Higher Results Are Better
"2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4",46,51,59,57,55,58,52,51,54
"m-queens 1.2 - Time To Solve",
Lower Results Are Better
"2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4",36.858,36.831,36.881
"miniBUDE 20210901 - Implementation: OpenMP - Input Deck: BM1",
Higher Results Are Better
"2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4",483.592,487.959,491.434
"miniBUDE 20210901 - Implementation: OpenMP - Input Deck: BM1",
Higher Results Are Better
"2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4",19.344,19.518,19.657
"miniBUDE 20210901 - Implementation: OpenMP - Input Deck: BM2",
Higher Results Are Better
"2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4",514.355,516.329,516.05
"miniBUDE 20210901 - Implementation: OpenMP - Input Deck: BM2",
Higher Results Are Better
"2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4",20.574,20.653,20.642
"NAMD 3.0 - ATPase Simulation - 327,506 Atoms",
Higher Results Are Better
"2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4",
"NAMD 3.0 - Input: ATPase with 327,506 Atoms",
Higher Results Are Better
"2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4",1.094943659674,1.1051787571381,1.0779265436178
"NAMD 3.0 - Input: STMV with 1,066,628 Atoms",
Higher Results Are Better
"2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4",0.32945564044529,0.32916067319941,0.32749411329331
"NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4 - Test / Class: EP.C",
Higher Results Are Better
"2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4",2721.26,2729.79,2757.62
"NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4 - Test / Class: LU.C",
Higher Results Are Better
"2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4",46888.17,46748.08,46807.58
"oneDNN 3.6 - Harness: Deconvolution Batch deconv_1d - Data Type: f32",
Lower Results Are Better
"2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4",
"oneDNN 3.6 - Harness: Convolution Batch conv_alexnet - Data Type: f32",
Lower Results Are Better
"2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4",
"oneDNN 3.6 - Harness: Convolution Batch conv_googlenet_v3 - Data Type: f32",
Lower Results Are Better
"2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4",
"OpenFOAM 10 - Input: drivaerFastback, Small Mesh Size",
Lower Results Are Better
"2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4",
"OpenFOAM 10 - Input: motorBike",
Lower Results Are Better
"2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4",
"OpenRadioss 2023.09.15 - Model: Bumper Beam",
Lower Results Are Better
"2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4",144.59,141.29,143.84
"OpenRadioss 2023.09.15 - Model: Ford Taurus 10M",
Lower Results Are Better
"2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4",
"OpenRadioss 2023.09.15 - Model: Chrysler Neon 1M",
Lower Results Are Better
"2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4",
"OpenRadioss 2023.09.15 - Model: Cell Phone Drop Test",
Lower Results Are Better
"2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4",74.99,74.87,75.5
"OpenRadioss 2023.09.15 - Model: Bird Strike on Windshield",
Lower Results Are Better
"2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4",232.13,229.11,230.19
"Pennant 1.0.1 - Test: sedovbig",
Lower Results Are Better
"2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4",38.14255,38.21181,38.30445
"Pennant 1.0.1 - Test: leblancbig",
Lower Results Are Better
"2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4",21.75074,21.81835,21.90311
"POV-Ray 3.7.0.7 - Trace Time",
Lower Results Are Better
"2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4",23.757,23.906,23.623
"PyBench 2018-02-16 - Total For Average Test Times",
Lower Results Are Better
"2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4",1159,1163,1162
"QuantLib 1.35-dev - Size: S",
Higher Results Are Better
"2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4",10.4256,10.427,10.4555
"QuantLib 1.35-dev - Size: XXS",
Higher Results Are Better
"2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4",10.9356,10.9507,10.9522
"Radiance Benchmark 5.0 - Test: Serial",
Lower Results Are Better
"2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4",
"Radiance Benchmark 5.0 - Test: SMP Parallel",
Lower Results Are Better
"2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4",
"Renaissance 0.14 - Test: Scala Dotty",
Lower Results Are Better
"2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4",
"Renaissance 0.14 - Test: Savina Reactors.IO",
Lower Results Are Better
"2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4",11559.630089,11982.19516,11189.814896,11369.952772,11810.208737,11274.858432,10737.128868,11250.595593,12140.64854,10698.190697,10891.027174,11722.562004
"Renaissance 0.14 - Test: Apache Spark PageRank",
Lower Results Are Better
"2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4",
"Rodinia 3.1 - Test: OpenMP LavaMD",
Lower Results Are Better
"2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4",133.199,134.05,133.192
"Rodinia 3.1 - Test: OpenMP HotSpot3D",
Lower Results Are Better
"2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4",141.406,141.336,141.555
"Rodinia 3.1 - Test: OpenMP Leukocyte",
Lower Results Are Better
"2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4",67.533,65.053,65.974
"Rodinia 3.1 - Test: OpenMP CFD Solver",
Lower Results Are Better
"2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4",11.353,11.146,10.968
"Rodinia 3.1 - Test: OpenMP Streamcluster",
Lower Results Are Better
"2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4",14.287,13.423,13.555,13.385,13.698,14.353,13.966,13.01,14.692,13.967,13.341,14.167,13.398,13.853,13.112
"Rust Mandelbrot - Time To Complete Serial/Parallel Mandelbrot",
Lower Results Are Better
"2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4",
"Stockfish 17 - Total Time",
Higher Results Are Better
"2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4",41234842,41040111,37354567,47158773,43729969,49048302
"SVT-AV1 2.3 - 1080p 8-bit YUV To AV1 Video Encode",
Higher Results Are Better
"2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4",
"SVT-HEVC 1.5.0 - 1080p 8-bit YUV To HEVC Video Encode",
Higher Results Are Better
"2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4",
"SVT-VP9 0.3 - 1080p 8-bit YUV To VP9 Video Encode",
Higher Results Are Better
"2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4",
"Timed GCC Compilation 13.2 - Time To Compile",
Lower Results Are Better
"2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4",
"Timed Linux Kernel Compilation 6.8 - Time To Compile",
Lower Results Are Better
"2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4",
"Timed LLVM Compilation 16.0 - Time To Compile",
Lower Results Are Better
"2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4",
"Timed Node.js Compilation 21.7.2 - Time To Compile",
Lower Results Are Better
"2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4",1994.519,2073.964,2089.911
"Timed PHP Compilation 8.3.4 - Time To Compile",
Lower Results Are Better
"2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4",77.701,79.235,78.213
"Timed Wasmer Compilation 2.3 - Time To Compile",
Lower Results Are Better
"2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4",77.001,77.078,75.148
"x264 2022-02-22 - H.264 Video Encoding",
Higher Results Are Better
"2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4",
"Xcompact3d Incompact3d 2021-03-11 - Input: X3D-benchmarking input.i3d",
Lower Results Are Better
"2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4",1295.30066,1153.71179,1149.40735,1147.83289,1148.5304,1144.52869,1143.74719,1146.1283,1146.45483
"Xcompact3d Incompact3d 2021-03-11 - Input: input.i3d 129 Cells Per Direction",
Lower Results Are Better
"2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4",10.5816078,10.56141,11.1673098,10.5594091,10.50564,10.5208921
"Xcompact3d Incompact3d 2021-03-11 - Input: input.i3d 193 Cells Per Direction",
Lower Results Are Better
"2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4",46.8561096,46.7260437,46.4893417