test lxc testing on Debian GNU/Linux 12 via the Phoronix Test Suite. r1: Processor: 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 @ 3.30GHz (28 Cores / 52 Threads), Motherboard: Dell PowerEdge R630 02C2CP (2.19.0 BIOS), Memory: 98GB, Disk: 1000GB TOSHIBA MQ01ABD1, Graphics: mgag200drmfb OS: Debian GNU/Linux 12, Kernel: 6.8.12-3-pve (x86_64), Compiler: GCC 12.2.0, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 1600x1200, System Layer: lxc 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4: Processor: 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 @ 3.30GHz (28 Cores / 52 Threads), Motherboard: Dell PowerEdge R630 02C2CP (2.19.0 BIOS), Memory: 98GB, Disk: 1000GB TOSHIBA MQ01ABD1, Graphics: mgag200drmfb OS: Debian GNU/Linux 12, Kernel: 6.8.12-3-pve (x86_64), Compiler: GCC 12.2.0, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 1600x1200, System Layer: lxc Stockfish 17 Total Time Nodes Per Second > Higher Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 . 43261094 |========================================= Renaissance 0.14 Test: Savina Reactors.IO ms < Lower Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 . 11385.6 |========================================== CacheBench Test: Write MB/s > Higher Is Better r1 . 36891.33 |================================================================ Timed LLVM Compilation 16.0 Time To Compile Seconds < Lower Is Better asmFish 2018-07-23 1024 Hash Memory, 26 Depth Nodes/second > Higher Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 . 62366573 |========================================= Rodinia 3.1 Test: OpenMP LavaMD Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 . 133.48 |=========================================== CacheBench Test: Read / Modify / Write MB/s > Higher Is Better r1 . 65744.18 |================================================================ CacheBench Test: Read MB/s > Higher Is Better r1 . 8361.63 |================================================================= Timed PHP Compilation 8.3.4 Time To Compile Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 . 78.38 |============================================ DaCapo Benchmark 23.11 Java Test: Tradebeans msec < Lower Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 . 19157 |============================================ Hackbench Count: 32 - Type: Process Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 . 57.43 |============================================ Himeno Benchmark 3.0 Poisson Pressure Solver MFLOPS > Higher Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 . 3324.24 |========================================== 7-Zip Compression 24.05 Test: Decompression Rating MIPS > Higher Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 . 122760 |=========================================== 7-Zip Compression 24.05 Test: Compression Rating MIPS > Higher Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 . 137422 |=========================================== NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4 Test / Class: LU.C Total Mop/s > Higher Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 . 46814.61 |========================================= m-queens 1.2 Time To Solve Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 . 36.86 |============================================ Cython Benchmark 0.29.21 Test: N-Queens Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 . 32.49 |============================================ DaCapo Benchmark 23.11 Java Test: Jython msec < Lower Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 . 8144 |============================================= John The Ripper 2023.03.14 Test: Blowfish Real C/S > Higher Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 . 30661 |============================================ Timed Linux Kernel Compilation 6.8 Time To Compile Seconds < Lower Is Better PyBench 2018-02-16 Total For Average Test Times Milliseconds < Lower Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 . 1161 |============================================= POV-Ray 3.7.0.7 Trace Time Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 . 23.76 |============================================ NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4 Test / Class: EP.C Total Mop/s > Higher Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 . 2736.22 |========================================== ctx_clock Context Switch Time Clocks < Lower Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 . 1063 |============================================= CP2K Molecular Dynamics 2024.3 Fayalite-FIST Data Seconds < Lower Is Better x264 2022-02-22 H.264 Video Encoding Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better NAMD 3.0 ATPase Simulation - 327,506 Atoms ns/day > Higher Is Better Renaissance 0.14 Test: Scala Dotty ms < Lower Is Better C-Ray 2.0 Total Time - 4K, 16 Rays Per Pixel Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 . 0.618 |============================================ Renaissance 0.14 Test: Apache Spark PageRank ms < Lower Is Better Radiance Benchmark 5.0 Test: SMP Parallel Seconds < Lower Is Better Radiance Benchmark 5.0 Test: Serial Seconds < Lower Is Better oneDNN 3.6 Harness: Convolution Batch conv_googlenet_v3 - Data Type: f32 ms < Lower Is Better oneDNN 3.6 Harness: Deconvolution Batch deconv_1d - Data Type: f32 ms < Lower Is Better oneDNN 3.6 Harness: Convolution Batch conv_alexnet - Data Type: f32 ms < Lower Is Better SVT-AV1 2.3 1080p 8-bit YUV To AV1 Video Encode Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better Timed GCC Compilation 13.2 Time To Compile Seconds < Lower Is Better SVT-VP9 0.3 1080p 8-bit YUV To VP9 Video Encode Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better Rust Mandelbrot Time To Complete Serial/Parallel Mandelbrot Seconds < Lower Is Better SVT-HEVC 1.5.0 1080p 8-bit YUV To HEVC Video Encode Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better