benchmark_20241010_191323 Automated benchmark graph-ubuntu-001: Processor: Intel Xeon Gold 5412U @ 3.90GHz (24 Cores / 48 Threads), Motherboard: ASRockRack SPC741D8UD-2T/X550/H (2.07.HZ04 BIOS), Chipset: Intel Device 1bce, Memory: 4 x 32 GB DDR5-4400MT/s Samsung M321R4GA3BB6-CQKVS, Disk: 2 x 3841GB INTEL SSDPF2KX038T1, Graphics: ASPEED, Monitor: Linux SXGA, Network: 2 x Intel 10G X550T OS: Ubuntu 22.04, Kernel: 5.15.0-119-generic (x86_64), Vulkan: 1.3.255, Compiler: GCC 11.4.0 + Clang 14.0.0-1ubuntu1.1, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 1280x1024 Apache HTTP Server 2.4.56 Concurrent Requests: 4 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HTTP Server 2.4.56 Concurrent Requests: 20 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HTTP Server 2.4.56 Concurrent Requests: 100 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better graph-ubuntu-001 . 133207.86 |================================================= Apache HTTP Server 2.4.56 Concurrent Requests: 200 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better graph-ubuntu-001 . 172293.17 |================================================= Apache HTTP Server 2.4.56 Concurrent Requests: 500 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better graph-ubuntu-001 . 175772.05 |================================================= Apache HTTP Server 2.4.56 Concurrent Requests: 1000 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better graph-ubuntu-001 . 173622.33 |================================================= Coremark 1.0 CoreMark Size 666 - Iterations Per Second Iterations/Sec > Higher Is Better graph-ubuntu-001 . 879408.03 |================================================= FS-Mark 3.3 Test: 1000 Files, 1MB Size Files/s > Higher Is Better graph-ubuntu-001 . 1245.2 |==================================================== FS-Mark 3.3 Test: 5000 Files, 1MB Size, 4 Threads Files/s > Higher Is Better graph-ubuntu-001 . 3969.3 |==================================================== FS-Mark 3.3 Test: 4000 Files, 32 Sub Dirs, 1MB Size Files/s > Higher Is Better graph-ubuntu-001 . 1329.2 |==================================================== FS-Mark 3.3 Test: 1000 Files, 1MB Size, No Sync/FSync Files/s > Higher Is Better graph-ubuntu-001 . 2038.4 |==================================================== IOzone 3.465 Record Size: 1MB - File Size: 2GB - Disk Test: Read Performance MB/s > Higher Is Better graph-ubuntu-001 . 8145.54 |=================================================== IOzone 3.465 Record Size: 1MB - File Size: 4GB - Disk Test: Read Performance MB/s > Higher Is Better graph-ubuntu-001 . 9009.88 |=================================================== IOzone 3.465 Record Size: 1MB - File Size: 8GB - Disk Test: Read Performance MB/s > Higher Is Better graph-ubuntu-001 . 8825.38 |=================================================== IOzone 3.465 Record Size: 2MB - File Size: 2GB - Disk Test: Read Performance MB/s > Higher Is Better graph-ubuntu-001 . 8597.68 |=================================================== IOzone 3.465 Record Size: 2MB - File Size: 4GB - Disk Test: Read Performance MB/s > Higher Is Better graph-ubuntu-001 . 8866.45 |=================================================== IOzone 3.465 Record Size: 2MB - File Size: 8GB - Disk Test: Read Performance MB/s > Higher Is Better graph-ubuntu-001 . 8840.88 |=================================================== IOzone 3.465 Record Size: 4Kb - File Size: 2GB - Disk Test: Read Performance MB/s > Higher Is Better graph-ubuntu-001 . 7181.81 |=================================================== IOzone 3.465 Record Size: 4Kb - File Size: 4GB - Disk Test: Read Performance MB/s > Higher Is Better graph-ubuntu-001 . 7343.46 |=================================================== IOzone 3.465 Record Size: 4Kb - File Size: 8GB - Disk Test: Read Performance MB/s > Higher Is Better graph-ubuntu-001 . 7324.45 |=================================================== IOzone 3.465 Record Size: 1MB - File Size: 2GB - Disk Test: Write Performance MB/s > Higher Is Better graph-ubuntu-001 . 1484.51 |=================================================== IOzone 3.465 Record Size: 1MB - File Size: 4GB - Disk Test: Write Performance MB/s > Higher Is Better graph-ubuntu-001 . 1473.78 |=================================================== IOzone 3.465 Record Size: 1MB - File Size: 8GB - Disk Test: Write Performance MB/s > Higher Is Better graph-ubuntu-001 . 1471.02 |=================================================== IOzone 3.465 Record Size: 2MB - File Size: 2GB - Disk Test: Write Performance MB/s > Higher Is Better graph-ubuntu-001 . 1435.40 |=================================================== IOzone 3.465 Record Size: 2MB - File Size: 4GB - Disk Test: Write Performance MB/s > Higher Is Better graph-ubuntu-001 . 1484.59 |=================================================== IOzone 3.465 Record Size: 2MB - File Size: 8GB - Disk Test: Write Performance MB/s > Higher Is Better graph-ubuntu-001 . 1522.25 |=================================================== IOzone 3.465 Record Size: 4Kb - File Size: 2GB - Disk Test: Write Performance MB/s > Higher Is Better graph-ubuntu-001 . 60.20 |===================================================== IOzone 3.465 Record Size: 4Kb - File Size: 4GB - Disk Test: Write Performance MB/s > Higher Is Better graph-ubuntu-001 . 59.95 |===================================================== IOzone 3.465 Record Size: 4Kb - File Size: 8GB - Disk Test: Write Performance MB/s > Higher Is Better graph-ubuntu-001 . 59.72 |===================================================== IOzone 3.465 Record Size: 64Kb - File Size: 2GB - Disk Test: Read Performance MB/s > Higher Is Better graph-ubuntu-001 . 8767.62 |=================================================== IOzone 3.465 Record Size: 64Kb - File Size: 4GB - Disk Test: Read Performance MB/s > Higher Is Better graph-ubuntu-001 . 8737.47 |=================================================== IOzone 3.465 Record Size: 64Kb - File Size: 8GB - Disk Test: Read Performance MB/s > Higher Is Better graph-ubuntu-001 . 9041.24 |=================================================== IOzone 3.465 Record Size: 1MB - File Size: 512MB - Disk Test: Read Performance MB/s > Higher Is Better graph-ubuntu-001 . 8319.19 |=================================================== IOzone 3.465 Record Size: 2MB - File Size: 512MB - Disk Test: Read Performance MB/s > Higher Is Better graph-ubuntu-001 . 7903.81 |=================================================== IOzone 3.465 Record Size: 4Kb - File Size: 512MB - Disk Test: Read Performance MB/s > Higher Is Better graph-ubuntu-001 . 6956.06 |=================================================== IOzone 3.465 Record Size: 64Kb - File Size: 2GB - Disk Test: Write Performance MB/s > Higher Is Better graph-ubuntu-001 . 576.14 |==================================================== IOzone 3.465 Record Size: 64Kb - File Size: 4GB - Disk Test: Write Performance MB/s > Higher Is Better graph-ubuntu-001 . 586.11 |==================================================== IOzone 3.465 Record Size: 64Kb - File Size: 8GB - Disk Test: Write Performance MB/s > Higher Is Better graph-ubuntu-001 . 580.26 |==================================================== IOzone 3.465 Record Size: 1MB - File Size: 512MB - Disk Test: Write Performance MB/s > Higher Is Better graph-ubuntu-001 . 1242.91 |=================================================== IOzone 3.465 Record Size: 2MB - File Size: 512MB - Disk Test: Write Performance MB/s > Higher Is Better graph-ubuntu-001 . 1325.36 |=================================================== IOzone 3.465 Record Size: 4Kb - File Size: 512MB - Disk Test: Write Performance MB/s > Higher Is Better graph-ubuntu-001 . 58.96 |===================================================== IOzone 3.465 Record Size: 64Kb - File Size: 512MB - Disk Test: Read Performance MB/s > Higher Is Better graph-ubuntu-001 . 8253.42 |=================================================== IOzone 3.465 Record Size: 64Kb - File Size: 512MB - Disk Test: Write Performance MB/s > Higher Is Better graph-ubuntu-001 . 580.11 |==================================================== Numpy Benchmark Score > Higher Is Better graph-ubuntu-001 . 436.19 |==================================================== PostgreSQL 17 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better graph-ubuntu-001 . 50141 |===================================================== PostgreSQL 17 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better graph-ubuntu-001 . 0.02 |====================================================== PostgreSQL 17 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better graph-ubuntu-001 . 6623 |====================================================== PostgreSQL 17 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better graph-ubuntu-001 . 0.151 |===================================================== PostgreSQL 17 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better graph-ubuntu-001 . 1869199 |=================================================== PostgreSQL 17 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better graph-ubuntu-001 . 0.026 |===================================================== PostgreSQL 17 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better graph-ubuntu-001 . 1735584 |=================================================== PostgreSQL 17 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better graph-ubuntu-001 . 0.058 |===================================================== PostgreSQL 17 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better graph-ubuntu-001 . 1860247 |=================================================== PostgreSQL 17 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better graph-ubuntu-001 . 0.134 |===================================================== PostgreSQL 17 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better graph-ubuntu-001 . 5135 |====================================================== PostgreSQL 17 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better graph-ubuntu-001 . 18.68 |===================================================== PostgreSQL 17 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better graph-ubuntu-001 . 1827809 |=================================================== PostgreSQL 17 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better graph-ubuntu-001 . 0.274 |===================================================== PostgreSQL 17 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 800 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better graph-ubuntu-001 . 1771486 |=================================================== PostgreSQL 17 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 800 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better graph-ubuntu-001 . 0.452 |===================================================== PostgreSQL 17 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better graph-ubuntu-001 . 46516 |===================================================== PostgreSQL 17 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better graph-ubuntu-001 . 0.021 |===================================================== PostgreSQL 17 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better graph-ubuntu-001 . 1829 |====================================================== PostgreSQL 17 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better graph-ubuntu-001 . 54.67 |===================================================== PostgreSQL 17 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 1000 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better graph-ubuntu-001 . 1746944 |=================================================== PostgreSQL 17 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 1000 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better graph-ubuntu-001 . 0.572 |===================================================== PostgreSQL 17 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better graph-ubuntu-001 . 4171 |====================================================== PostgreSQL 17 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better graph-ubuntu-001 . 59.96 |===================================================== PostgreSQL 17 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better graph-ubuntu-001 . 1755 |====================================================== PostgreSQL 17 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better graph-ubuntu-001 . 284.92 |==================================================== PostgreSQL 17 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 5000 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better PostgreSQL 17 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 800 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better graph-ubuntu-001 . 1278 |====================================================== PostgreSQL 17 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 800 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better graph-ubuntu-001 . 632.44 |==================================================== PostgreSQL 17 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better graph-ubuntu-001 . 6114 |====================================================== PostgreSQL 17 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better graph-ubuntu-001 . 0.164 |===================================================== PostgreSQL 17 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better graph-ubuntu-001 . 1741193 |=================================================== PostgreSQL 17 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better graph-ubuntu-001 . 0.029 |===================================================== PostgreSQL 17 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better graph-ubuntu-001 . 40761 |===================================================== PostgreSQL 17 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better graph-ubuntu-001 . 0.025 |===================================================== PostgreSQL 17 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 1000 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better graph-ubuntu-001 . 950 |======================================================= PostgreSQL 17 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 1000 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better graph-ubuntu-001 . 1056.82 |=================================================== PostgreSQL 17 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 5000 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better PostgreSQL 17 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better graph-ubuntu-001 . 1613352 |=================================================== PostgreSQL 17 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better graph-ubuntu-001 . 0.062 |===================================================== PostgreSQL 17 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better graph-ubuntu-001 . 1627348 |=================================================== PostgreSQL 17 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better graph-ubuntu-001 . 0.153 |===================================================== PostgreSQL 17 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better graph-ubuntu-001 . 89203 |===================================================== PostgreSQL 17 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better graph-ubuntu-001 . 0.561 |===================================================== PostgreSQL 17 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better graph-ubuntu-001 . 1568006 |=================================================== PostgreSQL 17 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better graph-ubuntu-001 . 0.319 |===================================================== PostgreSQL 17 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 800 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better graph-ubuntu-001 . 1508610 |=================================================== PostgreSQL 17 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 800 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better graph-ubuntu-001 . 0.530 |===================================================== PostgreSQL 17 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better graph-ubuntu-001 . 5451 |====================================================== PostgreSQL 17 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better graph-ubuntu-001 . 0.184 |===================================================== PostgreSQL 17 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better graph-ubuntu-001 . 1062362 |=================================================== PostgreSQL 17 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better graph-ubuntu-001 . 0.047 |===================================================== PostgreSQL 17 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better graph-ubuntu-001 . 17269 |===================================================== PostgreSQL 17 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better graph-ubuntu-001 . 0.058 |===================================================== PostgreSQL 17 Scaling Factor: 25000 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better graph-ubuntu-001 . 9846 |====================================================== PostgreSQL 17 Scaling Factor: 25000 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better graph-ubuntu-001 . 0.102 |===================================================== PostgreSQL 17 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better graph-ubuntu-001 . 90314 |===================================================== PostgreSQL 17 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better graph-ubuntu-001 . 1.107 |===================================================== PostgreSQL 17 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 1000 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better graph-ubuntu-001 . 1448843 |=================================================== PostgreSQL 17 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 1000 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better graph-ubuntu-001 . 0.692 |===================================================== PostgreSQL 17 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better graph-ubuntu-001 . 80493 |===================================================== PostgreSQL 17 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better graph-ubuntu-001 . 3.106 |===================================================== PostgreSQL 17 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better graph-ubuntu-001 . 69425 |===================================================== PostgreSQL 17 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better graph-ubuntu-001 . 7.202 |===================================================== PostgreSQL 17 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 5000 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better PostgreSQL 17 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 800 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better graph-ubuntu-001 . 58267 |===================================================== PostgreSQL 17 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 800 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better graph-ubuntu-001 . 13.73 |===================================================== PostgreSQL 17 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better graph-ubuntu-001 . 1152059 |=================================================== PostgreSQL 17 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better graph-ubuntu-001 . 0.087 |===================================================== PostgreSQL 17 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better graph-ubuntu-001 . 1030317 |=================================================== PostgreSQL 17 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better graph-ubuntu-001 . 0.242 |===================================================== PostgreSQL 17 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better graph-ubuntu-001 . 79542 |===================================================== PostgreSQL 17 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better graph-ubuntu-001 . 0.629 |===================================================== PostgreSQL 17 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better graph-ubuntu-001 . 968873 |==================================================== PostgreSQL 17 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better graph-ubuntu-001 . 0.516 |===================================================== PostgreSQL 17 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 800 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better graph-ubuntu-001 . 893434 |==================================================== PostgreSQL 17 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 800 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better graph-ubuntu-001 . 0.896 |===================================================== PostgreSQL 17 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better graph-ubuntu-001 . 4212 |====================================================== PostgreSQL 17 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better graph-ubuntu-001 . 0.238 |===================================================== PostgreSQL 17 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better graph-ubuntu-001 . 465991 |==================================================== PostgreSQL 17 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better graph-ubuntu-001 . 0.107 |===================================================== PostgreSQL 17 Scaling Factor: 25000 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better graph-ubuntu-001 . 3372 |====================================================== PostgreSQL 17 Scaling Factor: 25000 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better graph-ubuntu-001 . 0.297 |===================================================== PostgreSQL 17 Scaling Factor: 25000 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better graph-ubuntu-001 . 328153 |==================================================== PostgreSQL 17 Scaling Factor: 25000 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better graph-ubuntu-001 . 0.153 |===================================================== PostgreSQL 17 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 1000 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better graph-ubuntu-001 . 52092 |===================================================== PostgreSQL 17 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 1000 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better graph-ubuntu-001 . 19.20 |===================================================== PostgreSQL 17 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 5000 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better PostgreSQL 17 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better graph-ubuntu-001 . 86214 |===================================================== PostgreSQL 17 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better graph-ubuntu-001 . 1.160 |===================================================== PostgreSQL 17 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 1000 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better graph-ubuntu-001 . 874631 |==================================================== PostgreSQL 17 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 1000 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better graph-ubuntu-001 . 1.144 |===================================================== PostgreSQL 17 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better graph-ubuntu-001 . 77630 |===================================================== PostgreSQL 17 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better graph-ubuntu-001 . 3.220 |===================================================== PostgreSQL 17 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better graph-ubuntu-001 . 65736 |===================================================== PostgreSQL 17 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better graph-ubuntu-001 . 7.606 |===================================================== PostgreSQL 17 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 5000 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better PostgreSQL 17 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 800 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better graph-ubuntu-001 . 58496 |===================================================== PostgreSQL 17 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 800 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better graph-ubuntu-001 . 13.68 |===================================================== PostgreSQL 17 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better graph-ubuntu-001 . 549430 |==================================================== PostgreSQL 17 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better graph-ubuntu-001 . 0.182 |===================================================== PostgreSQL 17 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better graph-ubuntu-001 . 543629 |==================================================== PostgreSQL 17 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better graph-ubuntu-001 . 0.46 |====================================================== PostgreSQL 17 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better graph-ubuntu-001 . 58225 |===================================================== PostgreSQL 17 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better graph-ubuntu-001 . 0.859 |===================================================== PostgreSQL 17 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better graph-ubuntu-001 . 509058 |==================================================== PostgreSQL 17 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better graph-ubuntu-001 . 0.982 |===================================================== PostgreSQL 17 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 800 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better graph-ubuntu-001 . 441377 |==================================================== PostgreSQL 17 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 800 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better graph-ubuntu-001 . 1.813 |===================================================== PostgreSQL 17 Scaling Factor: 25000 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better graph-ubuntu-001 . 416228 |==================================================== PostgreSQL 17 Scaling Factor: 25000 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better graph-ubuntu-001 . 0.241 |===================================================== PostgreSQL 17 Scaling Factor: 25000 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better graph-ubuntu-001 . 455750 |==================================================== PostgreSQL 17 Scaling Factor: 25000 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better graph-ubuntu-001 . 0.549 |===================================================== PostgreSQL 17 Scaling Factor: 25000 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better graph-ubuntu-001 . 52923 |===================================================== PostgreSQL 17 Scaling Factor: 25000 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better graph-ubuntu-001 . 0.945 |===================================================== PostgreSQL 17 Scaling Factor: 25000 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better graph-ubuntu-001 . 440223 |==================================================== PostgreSQL 17 Scaling Factor: 25000 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better graph-ubuntu-001 . 1.136 |===================================================== PostgreSQL 17 Scaling Factor: 25000 - Clients: 800 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better graph-ubuntu-001 . 380962 |==================================================== PostgreSQL 17 Scaling Factor: 25000 - Clients: 800 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better graph-ubuntu-001 . 2.100 |===================================================== PostgreSQL 17 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 1000 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better graph-ubuntu-001 . 54943 |===================================================== PostgreSQL 17 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 1000 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better graph-ubuntu-001 . 18.20 |===================================================== PostgreSQL 17 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 5000 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better PostgreSQL 17 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better graph-ubuntu-001 . 54232 |===================================================== PostgreSQL 17 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better graph-ubuntu-001 . 1.844 |===================================================== PostgreSQL 17 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 1000 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better graph-ubuntu-001 . 402469 |==================================================== PostgreSQL 17 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 1000 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better graph-ubuntu-001 . 2.485 |===================================================== PostgreSQL 17 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better graph-ubuntu-001 . 48138 |===================================================== PostgreSQL 17 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better graph-ubuntu-001 . 5.194 |===================================================== PostgreSQL 17 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better graph-ubuntu-001 . 41160 |===================================================== PostgreSQL 17 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better graph-ubuntu-001 . 12.15 |===================================================== PostgreSQL 17 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 5000 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better PostgreSQL 17 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 800 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better graph-ubuntu-001 . 44458 |===================================================== PostgreSQL 17 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 800 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better graph-ubuntu-001 . 18.04 |===================================================== PostgreSQL 17 Scaling Factor: 25000 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better graph-ubuntu-001 . 52053 |===================================================== PostgreSQL 17 Scaling Factor: 25000 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better graph-ubuntu-001 . 1.921 |===================================================== PostgreSQL 17 Scaling Factor: 25000 - Clients: 1000 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better graph-ubuntu-001 . 368977 |==================================================== PostgreSQL 17 Scaling Factor: 25000 - Clients: 1000 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better graph-ubuntu-001 . 2.711 |===================================================== PostgreSQL 17 Scaling Factor: 25000 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better graph-ubuntu-001 . 45726 |===================================================== PostgreSQL 17 Scaling Factor: 25000 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better graph-ubuntu-001 . 5.468 |===================================================== PostgreSQL 17 Scaling Factor: 25000 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better graph-ubuntu-001 . 40757 |===================================================== PostgreSQL 17 Scaling Factor: 25000 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better graph-ubuntu-001 . 12.27 |===================================================== PostgreSQL 17 Scaling Factor: 25000 - Clients: 5000 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better PostgreSQL 17 Scaling Factor: 25000 - Clients: 800 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better graph-ubuntu-001 . 39117 |===================================================== PostgreSQL 17 Scaling Factor: 25000 - Clients: 800 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better graph-ubuntu-001 . 20.46 |===================================================== PostgreSQL 17 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 1000 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better graph-ubuntu-001 . 42112 |===================================================== PostgreSQL 17 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 1000 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better graph-ubuntu-001 . 23.75 |===================================================== PostgreSQL 17 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 5000 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better PostgreSQL 17 Scaling Factor: 25000 - Clients: 1000 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better graph-ubuntu-001 . 38471 |===================================================== PostgreSQL 17 Scaling Factor: 25000 - Clients: 1000 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better graph-ubuntu-001 . 26.00 |===================================================== PostgreSQL 17 Scaling Factor: 25000 - Clients: 5000 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better RAMspeed SMP 3.5.0 Type: Add - Benchmark: Integer MB/s > Higher Is Better graph-ubuntu-001 . 41172.21 |================================================== RAMspeed SMP 3.5.0 Type: Copy - Benchmark: Integer MB/s > Higher Is Better graph-ubuntu-001 . 42402.42 |================================================== RAMspeed SMP 3.5.0 Type: Scale - Benchmark: Integer MB/s > Higher Is Better graph-ubuntu-001 . 38612.78 |================================================== RAMspeed SMP 3.5.0 Type: Triad - Benchmark: Integer MB/s > Higher Is Better graph-ubuntu-001 . 39924.48 |================================================== RAMspeed SMP 3.5.0 Type: Average - Benchmark: Integer MB/s > Higher Is Better graph-ubuntu-001 . 40666.45 |================================================== RAMspeed SMP 3.5.0 Type: Add - Benchmark: Floating Point MB/s > Higher Is Better graph-ubuntu-001 . 40238.56 |================================================== RAMspeed SMP 3.5.0 Type: Copy - Benchmark: Floating Point MB/s > Higher Is Better graph-ubuntu-001 . 43296.25 |================================================== RAMspeed SMP 3.5.0 Type: Scale - Benchmark: Floating Point MB/s > Higher Is Better graph-ubuntu-001 . 43291.99 |================================================== RAMspeed SMP 3.5.0 Type: Triad - Benchmark: Floating Point MB/s > Higher Is Better graph-ubuntu-001 . 41186.35 |================================================== RAMspeed SMP 3.5.0 Type: Average - Benchmark: Floating Point MB/s > Higher Is Better graph-ubuntu-001 . 42046.15 |================================================== Redis 7.0.4 Test: GET - Parallel Connections: 50 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better graph-ubuntu-001 . 3109525.17 |================================================ Redis 7.0.4 Test: SET - Parallel Connections: 50 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better graph-ubuntu-001 . 2270848.09 |================================================ Redis 7.0.4 Test: GET - Parallel Connections: 500 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better graph-ubuntu-001 . 2682383.87 |================================================ Redis 7.0.4 Test: LPOP - Parallel Connections: 50 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better graph-ubuntu-001 . 2135033.67 |================================================ Redis 7.0.4 Test: SADD - Parallel Connections: 50 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better graph-ubuntu-001 . 2568485.05 |================================================ Redis 7.0.4 Test: SET - Parallel Connections: 500 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better graph-ubuntu-001 . 2144002.97 |================================================ Redis 7.0.4 Test: GET - Parallel Connections: 1000 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better graph-ubuntu-001 . 2666487.97 |================================================ Redis 7.0.4 Test: LPOP - Parallel Connections: 500 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better graph-ubuntu-001 . 1863638.12 |================================================ Redis 7.0.4 Test: LPUSH - Parallel Connections: 50 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better graph-ubuntu-001 . 2056943.84 |================================================ Redis 7.0.4 Test: SADD - Parallel Connections: 500 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better graph-ubuntu-001 . 2448006.72 |================================================ Redis 7.0.4 Test: SET - Parallel Connections: 1000 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better graph-ubuntu-001 . 2188652.68 |================================================ Redis 7.0.4 Test: LPOP - Parallel Connections: 1000 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better graph-ubuntu-001 . 1890305.50 |================================================ Redis 7.0.4 Test: LPUSH - Parallel Connections: 500 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better graph-ubuntu-001 . 1974614.88 |================================================ Redis 7.0.4 Test: SADD - Parallel Connections: 1000 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better graph-ubuntu-001 . 2548250.92 |================================================ Redis 7.0.4 Test: LPUSH - Parallel Connections: 1000 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better graph-ubuntu-001 . 1940957.70 |================================================ Smallpt 1.0 Global Illumination Renderer; 128 Samples Seconds < Lower Is Better graph-ubuntu-001 . 4.570 |===================================================== SQLite 3.41.2 Threads / Copies: 1 Seconds < Lower Is Better SQLite 3.41.2 Threads / Copies: 2 Seconds < Lower Is Better SQLite 3.41.2 Threads / Copies: 4 Seconds < Lower Is Better SQLite 3.41.2 Threads / Copies: 8 Seconds < Lower Is Better graph-ubuntu-001 . 2.404 |===================================================== SQLite 3.41.2 Threads / Copies: 16 Seconds < Lower Is Better graph-ubuntu-001 . 3.777 |===================================================== SQLite 3.41.2 Threads / Copies: 32 Seconds < Lower Is Better graph-ubuntu-001 . 5.824 |===================================================== SQLite 3.41.2 Threads / Copies: 48 Seconds < Lower Is Better graph-ubuntu-001 . 8.636 |===================================================== Stockfish 17 Chess Benchmark Nodes Per Second > Higher Is Better graph-ubuntu-001 . 44804180 |================================================== Stream 2013-01-17 Type: Copy MB/s > Higher Is Better graph-ubuntu-001 . 106690.9 |================================================== Stream 2013-01-17 Type: Scale MB/s > Higher Is Better graph-ubuntu-001 . 109188.8 |================================================== Stream 2013-01-17 Type: Triad MB/s > Higher Is Better graph-ubuntu-001 . 111510.6 |================================================== Stream 2013-01-17 Type: Add MB/s > Higher Is Better graph-ubuntu-001 . 111219.4 |================================================== Sysbench 1.0.20 Test: RAM / Memory MiB/sec > Higher Is Better graph-ubuntu-001 . 16835.90 |================================================== Sysbench 1.0.20 Test: CPU Events Per Second > Higher Is Better graph-ubuntu-001 . 62114.41 |================================================== TensorFlow 2.16.1 Device: CPU - Batch Size: 1 - Model: VGG-16 images/sec > Higher Is Better graph-ubuntu-001 . 9.64 |====================================================== TensorFlow 2.16.1 Device: GPU - Batch Size: 1 - Model: VGG-16 images/sec > Higher Is Better graph-ubuntu-001 . 1.59 |====================================================== TensorFlow 2.16.1 Device: CPU - Batch Size: 1 - Model: AlexNet images/sec > Higher Is Better graph-ubuntu-001 . 32.29 |===================================================== TensorFlow 2.16.1 Device: CPU - Batch Size: 16 - Model: VGG-16 images/sec > Higher Is Better graph-ubuntu-001 . 23.40 |===================================================== TensorFlow 2.16.1 Device: CPU - Batch Size: 32 - Model: VGG-16 images/sec > Higher Is Better graph-ubuntu-001 . 24.08 |===================================================== TensorFlow 2.16.1 Device: CPU - Batch Size: 64 - Model: VGG-16 images/sec > Higher Is Better graph-ubuntu-001 . 24.49 |===================================================== TensorFlow 2.16.1 Device: GPU - Batch Size: 1 - Model: AlexNet images/sec > Higher Is Better graph-ubuntu-001 . 10.82 |===================================================== TensorFlow 2.16.1 Device: GPU - Batch Size: 16 - Model: VGG-16 images/sec > Higher Is Better graph-ubuntu-001 . 2.91 |====================================================== TensorFlow 2.16.1 Device: GPU - Batch Size: 32 - Model: VGG-16 images/sec > Higher Is Better graph-ubuntu-001 . 3.17 |====================================================== TensorFlow 2.16.1 Device: GPU - Batch Size: 64 - Model: VGG-16 images/sec > Higher Is Better graph-ubuntu-001 . 3.26 |====================================================== TensorFlow 2.16.1 Device: CPU - Batch Size: 16 - Model: AlexNet images/sec > Higher Is Better graph-ubuntu-001 . 285.78 |==================================================== TensorFlow 2.16.1 Device: CPU - Batch Size: 256 - Model: VGG-16 images/sec > Higher Is Better graph-ubuntu-001 . 25.22 |===================================================== TensorFlow 2.16.1 Device: CPU - Batch Size: 32 - Model: AlexNet images/sec > Higher Is Better graph-ubuntu-001 . 397.83 |==================================================== TensorFlow 2.16.1 Device: CPU - Batch Size: 512 - Model: VGG-16 images/sec > Higher Is Better graph-ubuntu-001 . 25.13 |===================================================== TensorFlow 2.16.1 Device: CPU - Batch Size: 64 - Model: AlexNet images/sec > Higher Is Better graph-ubuntu-001 . 478.15 |==================================================== TensorFlow 2.16.1 Device: GPU - Batch Size: 16 - Model: AlexNet images/sec > Higher Is Better graph-ubuntu-001 . 32.44 |===================================================== TensorFlow 2.16.1 Device: GPU - Batch Size: 256 - Model: VGG-16 images/sec > Higher Is Better graph-ubuntu-001 . 3.36 |====================================================== TensorFlow 2.16.1 Device: GPU - Batch Size: 32 - Model: AlexNet images/sec > Higher Is Better graph-ubuntu-001 . 39.14 |===================================================== TensorFlow 2.16.1 Device: GPU - Batch Size: 512 - Model: VGG-16 images/sec > Higher Is Better graph-ubuntu-001 . 3.32 |====================================================== TensorFlow 2.16.1 Device: GPU - Batch Size: 64 - Model: AlexNet images/sec > Higher Is Better graph-ubuntu-001 . 44.87 |===================================================== TensorFlow 2.16.1 Device: CPU - Batch Size: 1 - Model: GoogLeNet images/sec > Higher Is Better graph-ubuntu-001 . 53.63 |===================================================== TensorFlow 2.16.1 Device: CPU - Batch Size: 1 - Model: ResNet-50 images/sec > Higher Is Better graph-ubuntu-001 . 16.86 |===================================================== TensorFlow 2.16.1 Device: CPU - Batch Size: 256 - Model: AlexNet images/sec > Higher Is Better graph-ubuntu-001 . 546.12 |==================================================== TensorFlow 2.16.1 Device: CPU - Batch Size: 512 - Model: AlexNet images/sec > Higher Is Better graph-ubuntu-001 . 570.76 |==================================================== TensorFlow 2.16.1 Device: GPU - Batch Size: 1 - Model: GoogLeNet images/sec > Higher Is Better graph-ubuntu-001 . 15.15 |===================================================== TensorFlow 2.16.1 Device: GPU - Batch Size: 1 - Model: ResNet-50 images/sec > Higher Is Better graph-ubuntu-001 . 3.84 |====================================================== TensorFlow 2.16.1 Device: GPU - Batch Size: 256 - Model: AlexNet images/sec > Higher Is Better graph-ubuntu-001 . 56.61 |===================================================== TensorFlow 2.16.1 Device: GPU - Batch Size: 512 - Model: AlexNet images/sec > Higher Is Better graph-ubuntu-001 . 58.98 |===================================================== TensorFlow 2.16.1 Device: CPU - Batch Size: 16 - Model: GoogLeNet images/sec > Higher Is Better graph-ubuntu-001 . 177.51 |==================================================== TensorFlow 2.16.1 Device: CPU - Batch Size: 16 - Model: ResNet-50 images/sec > Higher Is Better graph-ubuntu-001 . 52.72 |===================================================== TensorFlow 2.16.1 Device: CPU - Batch Size: 32 - Model: GoogLeNet images/sec > Higher Is Better graph-ubuntu-001 . 191.72 |==================================================== TensorFlow 2.16.1 Device: CPU - Batch Size: 32 - Model: ResNet-50 images/sec > Higher Is Better graph-ubuntu-001 . 57.51 |===================================================== TensorFlow 2.16.1 Device: CPU - Batch Size: 64 - Model: GoogLeNet images/sec > Higher Is Better graph-ubuntu-001 . 196.97 |==================================================== TensorFlow 2.16.1 Device: CPU - Batch Size: 64 - Model: ResNet-50 images/sec > Higher Is Better graph-ubuntu-001 . 59.32 |===================================================== TensorFlow 2.16.1 Device: GPU - Batch Size: 16 - Model: GoogLeNet images/sec > Higher Is Better graph-ubuntu-001 . 18.84 |===================================================== TensorFlow 2.16.1 Device: GPU - Batch Size: 16 - Model: ResNet-50 images/sec > Higher Is Better graph-ubuntu-001 . 6.20 |====================================================== TensorFlow 2.16.1 Device: GPU - Batch Size: 32 - Model: GoogLeNet images/sec > Higher Is Better graph-ubuntu-001 . 19.83 |===================================================== TensorFlow 2.16.1 Device: GPU - Batch Size: 32 - Model: ResNet-50 images/sec > Higher Is Better graph-ubuntu-001 . 7.26 |====================================================== TensorFlow 2.16.1 Device: GPU - Batch Size: 64 - Model: GoogLeNet images/sec > Higher Is Better graph-ubuntu-001 . 21.68 |===================================================== TensorFlow 2.16.1 Device: GPU - Batch Size: 64 - Model: ResNet-50 images/sec > Higher Is Better graph-ubuntu-001 . 8.17 |====================================================== TensorFlow 2.16.1 Device: CPU - Batch Size: 256 - Model: GoogLeNet images/sec > Higher Is Better graph-ubuntu-001 . 194.72 |==================================================== TensorFlow 2.16.1 Device: CPU - Batch Size: 256 - Model: ResNet-50 images/sec > Higher Is Better graph-ubuntu-001 . 58.48 |===================================================== TensorFlow 2.16.1 Device: CPU - Batch Size: 512 - Model: GoogLeNet images/sec > Higher Is Better graph-ubuntu-001 . 195.83 |==================================================== TensorFlow 2.16.1 Device: CPU - Batch Size: 512 - Model: ResNet-50 images/sec > Higher Is Better graph-ubuntu-001 . 59.67 |===================================================== TensorFlow 2.16.1 Device: GPU - Batch Size: 256 - Model: GoogLeNet images/sec > Higher Is Better graph-ubuntu-001 . 28.91 |===================================================== TensorFlow 2.16.1 Device: GPU - Batch Size: 256 - Model: ResNet-50 images/sec > Higher Is Better graph-ubuntu-001 . 9.47 |====================================================== TensorFlow 2.16.1 Device: GPU - Batch Size: 512 - Model: GoogLeNet images/sec > Higher Is Better graph-ubuntu-001 . 31.30 |===================================================== TensorFlow 2.16.1 Device: GPU - Batch Size: 512 - Model: ResNet-50 images/sec > Higher Is Better graph-ubuntu-001 . 9.56 |====================================================== Timed Linux Kernel Compilation 6.8 Build: defconfig Seconds < Lower Is Better graph-ubuntu-001 . 64.71 |===================================================== Timed Linux Kernel Compilation 6.8 Build: allmodconfig Seconds < Lower Is Better graph-ubuntu-001 . 777.45 |==================================================== Timed LLVM Compilation 16.0 Build System: Ninja Seconds < Lower Is Better graph-ubuntu-001 . 377.92 |==================================================== Timed LLVM Compilation 16.0 Build System: Unix Makefiles Seconds < Lower Is Better graph-ubuntu-001 . 425.61 |====================================================