AMD EPYC 9755 DDR5 Turin Memory Performance AMD EPYC 9755 with varying DDR5-6000 default versus DDR5-4800 memory performance. Benchmarks by Michael Larabel for a future article. DDR5-4800: Processor: AMD EPYC 9755 128-Core @ 2.70GHz (128 Cores / 256 Threads), Motherboard: AMD VOLCANO (RVOT1000D BIOS), Chipset: AMD Device 153a, Memory: 12 x 64GB DDR5-4800MT/s Samsung M321R8GA0PB1-CCPKC, Disk: 2 x 1920GB KIOXIA KCD8XPUG1T92, Graphics: ASPEED, Network: Broadcom NetXtreme BCM5720 PCIe OS: Ubuntu 24.04, Kernel: 6.10.0-phx (x86_64), Compiler: GCC 13.2.0, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 1920x1200 DDR5-6000: Processor: AMD EPYC 9755 128-Core @ 2.70GHz (128 Cores / 256 Threads), Motherboard: AMD VOLCANO (RVOT1000D BIOS), Chipset: AMD Device 153a, Memory: 12 x 64GB DDR5-6000MT/s Samsung M321R8GA0PB1-CCPKC, Disk: 2 x 1920GB KIOXIA KCD8XPUG1T92, Graphics: ASPEED, Network: Broadcom NetXtreme BCM5720 PCIe OS: Ubuntu 24.04, Kernel: 6.10.0-phx (x86_64), Compiler: GCC 13.2.0, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 1920x1200 Timed Linux Kernel Compilation 6.8 Build: defconfig Seconds < Lower Is Better DDR5-4800 . 23.47 |============================================================ DDR5-6000 . 23.34 |============================================================ Timed Linux Kernel Compilation 6.8 Build: allmodconfig Seconds < Lower Is Better DDR5-4800 . 198.90 |========================================================== DDR5-6000 . 201.76 |=========================================================== Timed FFmpeg Compilation 7.0 Time To Compile Seconds < Lower Is Better DDR5-4800 . 13.92 |============================================================ DDR5-6000 . 13.98 |============================================================ Timed Godot Game Engine Compilation 4.0 Time To Compile Seconds < Lower Is Better DDR5-4800 . 84.72 |============================================================ DDR5-6000 . 83.29 |=========================================================== Timed Node.js Compilation 21.7.2 Time To Compile Seconds < Lower Is Better DDR5-4800 . 110.55 |=========================================================== DDR5-6000 . 109.56 |========================================================== Timed Gem5 Compilation 23.0.1 Time To Compile Seconds < Lower Is Better DDR5-4800 . 130.54 |=========================================================== DDR5-6000 . 128.13 |========================================================== Timed LLVM Compilation 16.0 Build System: Ninja Seconds < Lower Is Better DDR5-4800 . 89.65 |============================================================ DDR5-6000 . 88.89 |=========================================================== Timed Mesa Compilation 24.0 Time To Compile Seconds < Lower Is Better DDR5-4800 . 13.66 |============================================================ DDR5-6000 . 13.67 |============================================================ Timed ImageMagick Compilation 6.9.0 Time To Compile Seconds < Lower Is Better DDR5-4800 . 10.012 |=========================================================== DDR5-6000 . 9.868 |========================================================== OpenSSL 3.3 Algorithm: RSA4096 sign/s > Higher Is Better DDR5-4800 . 69052.5 |========================================================== DDR5-6000 . 69037.7 |========================================================== OpenSSL 3.3 Algorithm: RSA4096 verify/s > Higher Is Better DDR5-4800 . 2757741.0 |======================================================== DDR5-6000 . 2755042.3 |======================================================== OpenSSL 3.3 Algorithm: SHA256 byte/s > Higher Is Better DDR5-4800 . 186789819953 |===================================================== DDR5-6000 . 186660393313 |===================================================== OpenSSL 3.3 Algorithm: SHA512 byte/s > Higher Is Better DDR5-4800 . 72936235753 |====================================================== DDR5-6000 . 72359767240 |====================================================== OpenSSL 3.3 Algorithm: AES-128-GCM byte/s > Higher Is Better DDR5-4800 . 2003313098753 |==================================================== DDR5-6000 . 2007365351470 |==================================================== OpenSSL 3.3 Algorithm: AES-256-GCM byte/s > Higher Is Better DDR5-4800 . 1839699436523 |==================================================== DDR5-6000 . 1837765850747 |==================================================== OpenSSL 3.3 Algorithm: ChaCha20 byte/s > Higher Is Better DDR5-4800 . 1187315147937 |==================================================== DDR5-6000 . 1186359294450 |==================================================== OpenSSL 3.3 Algorithm: ChaCha20-Poly1305 byte/s > Higher Is Better DDR5-4800 . 807588425637 |===================================================== DDR5-6000 . 807009841427 |===================================================== John The Ripper 2023.03.14 Test: Blowfish Real C/S > Higher Is Better DDR5-4800 . 322396 |=========================================================== DDR5-6000 . 323010 |=========================================================== John The Ripper 2023.03.14 Test: bcrypt Real C/S > Higher Is Better DDR5-4800 . 322406 |=========================================================== DDR5-6000 . 323000 |=========================================================== John The Ripper 2023.03.14 Test: WPA PSK Real C/S > Higher Is Better DDR5-4800 . 1360000 |========================================================== DDR5-6000 . 1361333 |========================================================== Apache IoTDB 1.2 Device Count: 500 - Batch Size Per Write: 100 - Sensor Count: 800 - Client Number: 400 point/sec > Higher Is Better DDR5-4800 . 118270441 |======================================================== DDR5-6000 . 117516797 |======================================================== Apache IoTDB 1.2 Device Count: 500 - Batch Size Per Write: 100 - Sensor Count: 800 - Client Number: 400 Average Latency < Lower Is Better DDR5-4800 . 225.70 |=========================================================== DDR5-6000 . 225.87 |=========================================================== Apache IoTDB 1.2 Device Count: 800 - Batch Size Per Write: 100 - Sensor Count: 800 - Client Number: 100 point/sec > Higher Is Better DDR5-4800 . 133128010 |======================================================== DDR5-6000 . 134210671 |======================================================== Apache IoTDB 1.2 Device Count: 800 - Batch Size Per Write: 100 - Sensor Count: 800 - Client Number: 100 Average Latency < Lower Is Better DDR5-4800 . 57.58 |============================================================ DDR5-6000 . 57.30 |============================================================ ClickHouse 22.12.3.5 100M Rows Hits Dataset, First Run / Cold Cache Queries Per Minute, Geo Mean > Higher Is Better DDR5-4800 . 680.81 |========================================================== DDR5-6000 . 698.12 |=========================================================== ClickHouse 22.12.3.5 100M Rows Hits Dataset, Second Run Queries Per Minute, Geo Mean > Higher Is Better DDR5-4800 . 693.77 |======================================================== DDR5-6000 . 729.56 |=========================================================== ClickHouse 22.12.3.5 100M Rows Hits Dataset, Third Run Queries Per Minute, Geo Mean > Higher Is Better DDR5-4800 . 704.36 |========================================================= DDR5-6000 . 724.64 |=========================================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 1000 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better DDR5-4800 . 127310 |=========================================================== DDR5-6000 . 126334 |=========================================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 1000 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better DDR5-4800 . 7.855 |============================================================ DDR5-6000 . 7.916 |============================================================ PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 1000 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better DDR5-4800 . 5364577 |========================================================= DDR5-6000 . 5418672 |========================================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 1000 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better DDR5-4800 . 0.187 |============================================================ DDR5-6000 . 0.185 |=========================================================== Memcached 1.6.19 Set To Get Ratio: 1:100 Ops/sec > Higher Is Better DDR5-4800 . 13455536.72 |====================================================== DDR5-6000 . 13316660.10 |===================================================== RocksDB 9.0 Test: Random Read Op/s > Higher Is Better DDR5-4800 . 793390385 |======================================================== DDR5-6000 . 786896580 |======================================================== RocksDB 9.0 Test: Read While Writing Op/s > Higher Is Better DDR5-4800 . 16817111 |======================================================== DDR5-6000 . 17063021 |========================================================= Speedb 2.7 Test: Random Read Op/s > Higher Is Better DDR5-4800 . 818556768 |======================================================== DDR5-6000 . 822102828 |======================================================== Speedb 2.7 Test: Read While Writing Op/s > Higher Is Better DDR5-4800 . 18826431 |========================================================= DDR5-6000 . 18687897 |========================================================= SecureMark 1.0.4 Benchmark: SecureMark-TLS marks > Higher Is Better DDR5-4800 . 407759 |=========================================================== DDR5-6000 . 405454 |=========================================================== Coremark 1.0 CoreMark Size 666 - Iterations Per Second Iterations/Sec > Higher Is Better DDR5-4800 . 6019991.22 |======================================================= DDR5-6000 . 6042366.34 |======================================================= Google SynthMark 20201109 Test: VoiceMark_100 Voices > Higher Is Better Algebraic Multi-Grid Benchmark 1.2 Figure Of Merit > Higher Is Better DDR5-4800 . 2698476000 |=============================================== DDR5-6000 . 3177082000 |======================================================= WRF 4.2.2 Input: conus 2.5km Seconds < Lower Is Better DDR5-4800 . 6206.69 |========================================================== DDR5-6000 . 5574.36 |==================================================== ACES DGEMM 1.0 Sustained Floating-Point Rate GFLOP/s > Higher Is Better DDR5-4800 . 55.87 |=========================================================== DDR5-6000 . 56.41 |============================================================ LULESH 2.0.3 z/s > Higher Is Better DDR5-4800 . 35386.94 |====================================================== DDR5-6000 . 37645.97 |========================================================= miniBUDE 20210901 Implementation: OpenMP - Input Deck: BM1 GFInst/s > Higher Is Better DDR5-4800 . 9597.53 |========================================================== DDR5-6000 . 9647.50 |========================================================== miniBUDE 20210901 Implementation: OpenMP - Input Deck: BM1 Billion Interactions/s > Higher Is Better DDR5-4800 . 383.90 |=========================================================== DDR5-6000 . 385.90 |=========================================================== miniBUDE 20210901 Implementation: OpenMP - Input Deck: BM2 GFInst/s > Higher Is Better DDR5-4800 . 9655.08 |========================================================== DDR5-6000 . 9654.58 |========================================================== miniBUDE 20210901 Implementation: OpenMP - Input Deck: BM2 Billion Interactions/s > Higher Is Better DDR5-4800 . 386.20 |=========================================================== DDR5-6000 . 386.18 |=========================================================== LAMMPS Molecular Dynamics Simulator 23Jun2022 Model: Rhodopsin Protein ns/day > Higher Is Better DDR5-4800 . 55.15 |=========================================================== DDR5-6000 . 55.79 |============================================================ LAMMPS Molecular Dynamics Simulator 23Jun2022 Model: 20k Atoms ns/day > Higher Is Better DDR5-4800 . 68.48 |============================================================ DDR5-6000 . 67.78 |=========================================================== m-queens 1.2 Time To Solve Seconds < Lower Is Better DDR5-4800 . 5.454 |============================================================ DDR5-6000 . 5.492 |============================================================ miniFE 2.2 Problem Size: Small CG Mflops > Higher Is Better DDR5-4800 . 59008.4 |================================================== DDR5-6000 . 69057.1 |========================================================== ASKAP 1.0 Test: tConvolve MPI - Degridding Mpix/sec > Higher Is Better DDR5-4800 . 66651.4 |======================================================= DDR5-6000 . 70762.8 |========================================================== ASKAP 1.0 Test: tConvolve MPI - Gridding Mpix/sec > Higher Is Better DDR5-4800 . 68467.4 |====================================================== DDR5-6000 . 74093.3 |========================================================== ASKAP 1.0 Test: tConvolve MT - Gridding Million Grid Points Per Second > Higher Is Better DDR5-4800 . 14143.3 |================================================== DDR5-6000 . 16464.1 |========================================================== NAMD 3.0b6 Input: ATPase with 327,506 Atoms ns/day > Higher Is Better DDR5-4800 . 14.04 |=========================================================== DDR5-6000 . 14.24 |============================================================ NAMD 3.0b6 Input: STMV with 1,066,628 Atoms ns/day > Higher Is Better DDR5-4800 . 4.54707 |========================================================= DDR5-6000 . 4.62277 |========================================================== GROMACS 2024 Implementation: MPI CPU - Input: water_GMX50_bare Ns Per Day > Higher Is Better DDR5-4800 . 22.51 |=========================================================== DDR5-6000 . 22.73 |============================================================ CloverLeaf 1.3 Input: clover_bm64_short Seconds < Lower Is Better DDR5-4800 . 25.79 |============================================================ DDR5-6000 . 22.09 |=================================================== CloverLeaf 1.3 Input: clover_bm16 Seconds < Lower Is Better DDR5-4800 . 209.96 |=========================================================== DDR5-6000 . 178.93 |================================================== QuantLib 1.32 Configuration: Single-Threaded MFLOPS > Higher Is Better DDR5-4800 . 4252.2 |=========================================================== DDR5-6000 . 4264.7 |=========================================================== QuantLib 1.32 Configuration: Multi-Threaded MFLOPS > Higher Is Better DDR5-4800 . 464193.2 |========================================================= DDR5-6000 . 465436.8 |========================================================= QMCPACK 3.17.1 Input: Li2_STO_ae Total Execution Time - Seconds < Lower Is Better DDR5-4800 . 78.80 |============================================================ DDR5-6000 . 79.02 |============================================================ GPAW 23.6 Input: Carbon Nanotube Seconds < Lower Is Better DDR5-4800 . 24.30 |============================================================ DDR5-6000 . 23.82 |=========================================================== High Performance Conjugate Gradient 3.1 X Y Z: 144 144 144 - RT: 60 GFLOP/s > Higher Is Better DDR5-4800 . 53.74 |=================================================== DDR5-6000 . 63.67 |============================================================ Pennant 1.0.1 Test: leblancbig Hydro Cycle Time - Seconds < Lower Is Better DDR5-4800 . 2.856528 |========================================================= DDR5-6000 . 2.761260 |======================================================= NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4 Test / Class: LU.C Total Mop/s > Higher Is Better DDR5-4800 . 383603.91 |======================================================== DDR5-6000 . 385558.53 |======================================================== NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4 Test / Class: SP.C Total Mop/s > Higher Is Better DDR5-4800 . 172595.77 |================================================== DDR5-6000 . 194853.91 |======================================================== NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4 Test / Class: IS.D Total Mop/s > Higher Is Better DDR5-4800 . 7995.28 |====================================================== DDR5-6000 . 8647.62 |========================================================== NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4 Test / Class: MG.C Total Mop/s > Higher Is Better DDR5-4800 . 149191.03 |================================================== DDR5-6000 . 167026.93 |======================================================== NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4 Test / Class: CG.C Total Mop/s > Higher Is Better DDR5-4800 . 88719.53 |========================================================= DDR5-6000 . 88208.36 |========================================================= NWChem 7.0.2 Input: C240 Buckyball Seconds < Lower Is Better DDR5-4800 . 1328.9 |=========================================================== DDR5-6000 . 1326.2 |=========================================================== Xcompact3d Incompact3d 2021-03-11 Input: input.i3d 193 Cells Per Direction Seconds < Lower Is Better DDR5-4800 . 6.79525073 |======================================================= DDR5-6000 . 6.47804538 |==================================================== Xcompact3d Incompact3d 2021-03-11 Input: X3D-benchmarking input.i3d Seconds < Lower Is Better DDR5-4800 . 222.62 |=========================================================== DDR5-6000 . 199.84 |===================================================== BRL-CAD 7.38.2 VGR Performance Metric VGR Performance Metric > Higher Is Better DDR5-4800 . 5848380 |========================================================== DDR5-6000 . 5899055 |========================================================== OpenFOAM 10 Input: drivaerFastback, Small Mesh Size - Mesh Time Seconds < Lower Is Better DDR5-4800 . 22.90 |============================================================ DDR5-6000 . 21.44 |======================================================== OpenFOAM 10 Input: drivaerFastback, Small Mesh Size - Execution Time Seconds < Lower Is Better DDR5-4800 . 20.55 |============================================================ DDR5-6000 . 20.60 |============================================================ OpenFOAM 10 Input: drivaerFastback, Medium Mesh Size - Execution Time Seconds < Lower Is Better DDR5-4800 . 177.11 |=========================================================== DDR5-6000 . 160.37 |===================================================== OpenRadioss 2023.09.15 Model: Cell Phone Drop Test Seconds < Lower Is Better DDR5-4800 . 17.74 |============================================================ DDR5-6000 . 17.87 |============================================================ OpenRadioss 2023.09.15 Model: INIVOL and Fluid Structure Interaction Drop Container Seconds < Lower Is Better DDR5-4800 . 73.70 |============================================================ DDR5-6000 . 73.67 |============================================================ OpenRadioss 2023.09.15 Model: Chrysler Neon 1M Seconds < Lower Is Better DDR5-4800 . 85.36 |============================================================ DDR5-6000 . 77.26 |====================================================== Blender 4.1 Blend File: BMW27 - Compute: CPU-Only Seconds < Lower Is Better DDR5-4800 . 9.63 |============================================================= DDR5-6000 . 9.46 |============================================================ Blender 4.1 Blend File: Classroom - Compute: CPU-Only Seconds < Lower Is Better DDR5-4800 . 24.21 |============================================================ DDR5-6000 . 24.00 |=========================================================== Blender 4.1 Blend File: Fishy Cat - Compute: CPU-Only Seconds < Lower Is Better DDR5-4800 . 12.53 |============================================================ DDR5-6000 . 12.50 |============================================================ Blender 4.1 Blend File: Pabellon Barcelona - Compute: CPU-Only Seconds < Lower Is Better DDR5-4800 . 29.90 |============================================================ DDR5-6000 . 29.75 |============================================================ Blender 4.1 Blend File: Barbershop - Compute: CPU-Only Seconds < Lower Is Better DDR5-4800 . 87.28 |============================================================ DDR5-6000 . 86.62 |============================================================ Blender 4.1 Blend File: Junkshop - Compute: CPU-Only Seconds < Lower Is Better DDR5-4800 . 12.98 |============================================================ DDR5-6000 . 12.71 |=========================================================== Appleseed 2.0 Beta Scene: Disney Material Seconds < Lower Is Better DDR5-4800 . 30.50 |============================================================ DDR5-6000 . 30.69 |============================================================ LuxCoreRender 2.6 Scene: DLSC - Acceleration: CPU M samples/sec > Higher Is Better DDR5-4800 . 21.20 |============================================================ DDR5-6000 . 20.94 |=========================================================== LuxCoreRender 2.6 Scene: LuxCore Benchmark - Acceleration: CPU M samples/sec > Higher Is Better DDR5-4800 . 13.93 |============================================================ DDR5-6000 . 13.96 |============================================================ LuxCoreRender 2.6 Scene: Orange Juice - Acceleration: CPU M samples/sec > Higher Is Better DDR5-4800 . 30.83 |========================================================== DDR5-6000 . 32.02 |============================================================ OSPRay 3.1 Benchmark: gravity_spheres_volume/dim_512/pathtracer/real_time Items Per Second > Higher Is Better DDR5-4800 . 54.96 |============================================================ DDR5-6000 . 55.18 |============================================================ OSPRay 3.1 Benchmark: particle_volume/ao/real_time Items Per Second > Higher Is Better DDR5-4800 . 54.38 |============================================================ DDR5-6000 . 54.39 |============================================================ OSPRay 3.1 Benchmark: particle_volume/scivis/real_time Items Per Second > Higher Is Better DDR5-4800 . 54.57 |============================================================ DDR5-6000 . 54.40 |============================================================ OSPRay Studio 1.0 Camera: 1 - Resolution: 4K - Samples Per Pixel: 1 - Renderer: Path Tracer - Acceleration: CPU ms < Lower Is Better DDR5-4800 . 642 |============================================================== DDR5-6000 . 639 |============================================================== OSPRay Studio 1.0 Camera: 1 - Resolution: 4K - Samples Per Pixel: 16 - Renderer: Path Tracer - Acceleration: CPU ms < Lower Is Better DDR5-4800 . 10200 |============================================================ DDR5-6000 . 10154 |============================================================ OSPRay Studio 1.0 Camera: 1 - Resolution: 4K - Samples Per Pixel: 32 - Renderer: Path Tracer - Acceleration: CPU ms < Lower Is Better DDR5-4800 . 20428 |============================================================ DDR5-6000 . 20379 |============================================================ OSPRay Studio 1.0 Camera: 3 - Resolution: 4K - Samples Per Pixel: 1 - Renderer: Path Tracer - Acceleration: CPU ms < Lower Is Better DDR5-4800 . 758 |============================================================== DDR5-6000 . 753 |============================================================== OSPRay Studio 1.0 Camera: 3 - Resolution: 4K - Samples Per Pixel: 16 - Renderer: Path Tracer - Acceleration: CPU ms < Lower Is Better DDR5-4800 . 12063 |============================================================ DDR5-6000 . 11982 |============================================================ OSPRay Studio 1.0 Camera: 3 - Resolution: 4K - Samples Per Pixel: 32 - Renderer: Path Tracer - Acceleration: CPU ms < Lower Is Better DDR5-4800 . 24131 |============================================================ DDR5-6000 . 23981 |============================================================ Embree 4.3 Binary: Pathtracer ISPC - Model: Asian Dragon Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better DDR5-4800 . 220.00 |========================================================== DDR5-6000 . 223.21 |=========================================================== Embree 4.3 Binary: Pathtracer ISPC - Model: Asian Dragon Obj Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better DDR5-4800 . 189.00 |========================================================== DDR5-6000 . 191.78 |=========================================================== Embree 4.3 Binary: Pathtracer ISPC - Model: Crown Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better DDR5-4800 . 178.52 |=========================================================== DDR5-6000 . 179.45 |=========================================================== Intel Open Image Denoise 2.2 Run: RT.hdr_alb_nrm.3840x2160 - Device: CPU-Only Images / Sec > Higher Is Better DDR5-4800 . 5.72 |============================================================ DDR5-6000 . 5.84 |============================================================= Intel Open Image Denoise 2.2 Run: RT.ldr_alb_nrm.3840x2160 - Device: CPU-Only Images / Sec > Higher Is Better DDR5-4800 . 5.73 |============================================================ DDR5-6000 . 5.85 |============================================================= Intel Open Image Denoise 2.2 Run: RTLightmap.hdr.4096x4096 - Device: CPU-Only Images / Sec > Higher Is Better DDR5-4800 . 2.77 |=========================================================== DDR5-6000 . 2.85 |============================================================= OpenVKL 2.0.0 Benchmark: vklBenchmarkCPU ISPC Items / Sec > Higher Is Better DDR5-4800 . 3614 |============================================================ DDR5-6000 . 3654 |============================================================= 7-Zip Compression 22.01 Test: Compression Rating MIPS > Higher Is Better DDR5-4800 . 882936 |========================================================= DDR5-6000 . 908159 |=========================================================== 7-Zip Compression 22.01 Test: Decompression Rating MIPS > Higher Is Better DDR5-4800 . 845631 |=========================================================== DDR5-6000 . 846736 |=========================================================== Parallel BZIP2 Compression 1.1.13 FreeBSD-13.0-RELEASE-amd64-memstick.img Compression Seconds < Lower Is Better DDR5-4800 . 0.941118 |========================================================= DDR5-6000 . 0.934896 |========================================================= Zstd Compression 1.5.4 Compression Level: 19 - Compression Speed MB/s > Higher Is Better DDR5-4800 . 21.4 |============================================================ DDR5-6000 . 21.8 |============================================================= Zstd Compression 1.5.4 Compression Level: 19 - Decompression Speed MB/s > Higher Is Better DDR5-4800 . 1721.5 |=========================================================== DDR5-6000 . 1726.4 |=========================================================== Zstd Compression 1.5.4 Compression Level: 19, Long Mode - Compression Speed MB/s > Higher Is Better DDR5-4800 . 10.2 |============================================================= DDR5-6000 . 10.2 |============================================================= Zstd Compression 1.5.4 Compression Level: 19, Long Mode - Decompression Speed MB/s > Higher Is Better DDR5-4800 . 1627.7 |=========================================================== DDR5-6000 . 1636.4 |=========================================================== PyBench 2018-02-16 Total For Average Test Times Milliseconds < Lower Is Better DDR5-4800 . 582 |============================================================== DDR5-6000 . 582 |============================================================== Numpy Benchmark Score > Higher Is Better DDR5-4800 . 796.77 |=========================================================== DDR5-6000 . 795.83 |=========================================================== SVT-AV1 2.0 Encoder Mode: Preset 13 - Input: Bosphorus 4K Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better DDR5-4800 . 265.85 |========================================================== DDR5-6000 . 271.92 |=========================================================== SVT-AV1 2.0 Encoder Mode: Preset 12 - Input: Bosphorus 4K Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better DDR5-4800 . 274.07 |========================================================= DDR5-6000 . 281.59 |=========================================================== SVT-AV1 2.0 Encoder Mode: Preset 8 - Input: Bosphorus 4K Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better DDR5-4800 . 117.85 |=========================================================== DDR5-6000 . 118.16 |=========================================================== SVT-AV1 2.0 Encoder Mode: Preset 4 - Input: Bosphorus 4K Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better DDR5-4800 . 11.26 |============================================================ DDR5-6000 . 11.28 |============================================================ x265 3.6 Video Input: Bosphorus 4K Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better DDR5-4800 . 34.08 |============================================================ DDR5-6000 . 34.21 |============================================================ Kvazaar 2.2 Video Input: Bosphorus 4K - Video Preset: Slow Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better DDR5-4800 . 53.43 |============================================================ DDR5-6000 . 53.42 |============================================================ Kvazaar 2.2 Video Input: Bosphorus 4K - Video Preset: Medium Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better DDR5-4800 . 53.99 |============================================================ DDR5-6000 . 53.95 |============================================================ Kvazaar 2.2 Video Input: Bosphorus 4K - Video Preset: Very Fast Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better DDR5-4800 . 94.71 |=========================================================== DDR5-6000 . 96.81 |============================================================ uvg266 0.4.1 Video Input: Bosphorus 4K - Video Preset: Slow Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better DDR5-4800 . 39.25 |============================================================ DDR5-6000 . 39.14 |============================================================ uvg266 0.4.1 Video Input: Bosphorus 4K - Video Preset: Medium Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better DDR5-4800 . 43.96 |============================================================ DDR5-6000 . 43.85 |============================================================ uvg266 0.4.1 Video Input: Bosphorus 4K - Video Preset: Very Fast Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better DDR5-4800 . 76.35 |=========================================================== DDR5-6000 . 78.23 |============================================================ FFmpeg 7.0 Encoder: libx265 - Scenario: Upload FPS > Higher Is Better DDR5-4800 . 32.57 |============================================================ DDR5-6000 . 32.34 |============================================================ FFmpeg 7.0 Encoder: libx265 - Scenario: Platform FPS > Higher Is Better DDR5-4800 . 67.14 |============================================================ DDR5-6000 . 66.60 |============================================================ FFmpeg 7.0 Encoder: libx265 - Scenario: Video On Demand FPS > Higher Is Better DDR5-4800 . 67.05 |============================================================ DDR5-6000 . 66.51 |============================================================ VVenC 1.11 Video Input: Bosphorus 4K - Video Preset: Fast Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better DDR5-4800 . 9.719 |=========================================================== DDR5-6000 . 9.810 |============================================================ VVenC 1.11 Video Input: Bosphorus 4K - Video Preset: Faster Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better DDR5-4800 . 22.88 |========================================================== DDR5-6000 . 23.74 |============================================================ WebP Image Encode 1.2.4 Encode Settings: Quality 100, Highest Compression MP/s > Higher Is Better DDR5-4800 . 3.88 |============================================================= DDR5-6000 . 3.90 |============================================================= WebP Image Encode 1.2.4 Encode Settings: Quality 100, Lossless, Highest Compression MP/s > Higher Is Better DDR5-4800 . 0.67 |============================================================ DDR5-6000 . 0.68 |============================================================= libavif avifenc 1.0 Encoder Speed: 0 Seconds < Lower Is Better DDR5-4800 . 47.55 |============================================================ DDR5-6000 . 47.47 |============================================================ libavif avifenc 1.0 Encoder Speed: 2 Seconds < Lower Is Better DDR5-4800 . 24.81 |============================================================ DDR5-6000 . 24.80 |============================================================ libavif avifenc 1.0 Encoder Speed: 6 Seconds < Lower Is Better DDR5-4800 . 2.006 |============================================================ DDR5-6000 . 2.003 |============================================================ libavif avifenc 1.0 Encoder Speed: 6, Lossless Seconds < Lower Is Better DDR5-4800 . 4.256 |============================================================ DDR5-6000 . 4.221 |============================================================ libavif avifenc 1.0 Encoder Speed: 10, Lossless Seconds < Lower Is Better DDR5-4800 . 3.452 |============================================================ DDR5-6000 . 3.459 |============================================================ ASTC Encoder 4.7 Preset: Medium MT/s > Higher Is Better DDR5-4800 . 697.19 |=========================================================== DDR5-6000 . 701.73 |=========================================================== ASTC Encoder 4.7 Preset: Thorough MT/s > Higher Is Better DDR5-4800 . 110.03 |=========================================================== DDR5-6000 . 110.04 |=========================================================== ASTC Encoder 4.7 Preset: Very Thorough MT/s > Higher Is Better DDR5-4800 . 15.71 |============================================================ DDR5-6000 . 15.72 |============================================================ ASTC Encoder 4.7 Preset: Exhaustive MT/s > Higher Is Better DDR5-4800 . 9.6576 |=========================================================== DDR5-6000 . 9.6576 |=========================================================== GraphicsMagick 1.3.43 Operation: Noise-Gaussian Iterations Per Minute > Higher Is Better DDR5-4800 . 314 |============================================================== DDR5-6000 . 313 |============================================================== GraphicsMagick 1.3.43 Operation: Enhanced Iterations Per Minute > Higher Is Better DDR5-4800 . 457 |============================================================== DDR5-6000 . 455 |============================================================== GraphicsMagick 1.3.43 Operation: Sharpen Iterations Per Minute > Higher Is Better DDR5-4800 . 406 |============================================================== DDR5-6000 . 403 |============================================================== GraphicsMagick 1.3.43 Operation: Swirl Iterations Per Minute > Higher Is Better DDR5-4800 . 865 |============================================================== DDR5-6000 . 851 |============================================================= Liquid-DSP 1.6 Threads: 1 - Buffer Length: 256 - Filter Length: 32 samples/s > Higher Is Better DDR5-4800 . 44063000 |========================================================= DDR5-6000 . 44054000 |========================================================= Liquid-DSP 1.6 Threads: 1 - Buffer Length: 256 - Filter Length: 57 samples/s > Higher Is Better DDR5-4800 . 68321333 |========================================================= DDR5-6000 . 68181667 |========================================================= Liquid-DSP 1.6 Threads: 1 - Buffer Length: 256 - Filter Length: 512 samples/s > Higher Is Better DDR5-4800 . 23164333 |========================================================= DDR5-6000 . 23093667 |========================================================= Liquid-DSP 1.6 Threads: 64 - Buffer Length: 256 - Filter Length: 32 samples/s > Higher Is Better DDR5-4800 . 2783133333 |======================================================= DDR5-6000 . 2784566667 |======================================================= Liquid-DSP 1.6 Threads: 64 - Buffer Length: 256 - Filter Length: 57 samples/s > Higher Is Better DDR5-4800 . 3298933333 |======================================================= DDR5-6000 . 3299400000 |======================================================= Liquid-DSP 1.6 Threads: 64 - Buffer Length: 256 - Filter Length: 512 samples/s > Higher Is Better DDR5-4800 . 1446266667 |======================================================= DDR5-6000 . 1442500000 |======================================================= Liquid-DSP 1.6 Threads: 128 - Buffer Length: 256 - Filter Length: 32 samples/s > Higher Is Better DDR5-4800 . 5424133333 |======================================================= DDR5-6000 . 5407600000 |======================================================= Liquid-DSP 1.6 Threads: 128 - Buffer Length: 256 - Filter Length: 57 samples/s > Higher Is Better DDR5-4800 . 5834800000 |======================================================= DDR5-6000 . 5876566667 |======================================================= Liquid-DSP 1.6 Threads: 128 - Buffer Length: 256 - Filter Length: 512 samples/s > Higher Is Better DDR5-4800 . 2484533333 |======================================================= DDR5-6000 . 2487400000 |======================================================= Liquid-DSP 1.6 Threads: 256 - Buffer Length: 256 - Filter Length: 32 samples/s > Higher Is Better DDR5-4800 . 8463100000 |======================================================= DDR5-6000 . 8494733333 |======================================================= Liquid-DSP 1.6 Threads: 256 - Buffer Length: 256 - Filter Length: 57 samples/s > Higher Is Better DDR5-4800 . 8196166667 |======================================================= DDR5-6000 . 8151900000 |======================================================= Liquid-DSP 1.6 Threads: 256 - Buffer Length: 256 - Filter Length: 512 samples/s > Higher Is Better DDR5-4800 . 2855600000 |======================================================= DDR5-6000 . 2855466667 |======================================================= srsRAN Project 23.10.1-20240325 Test: PUSCH Processor Benchmark, Throughput Total Mbps > Higher Is Better DDR5-4800 . 8056.3 |=========================================================== DDR5-6000 . 7954.2 |========================================================== srsRAN Project 23.10.1-20240325 Test: PUSCH Processor Benchmark, Throughput Thread Mbps > Higher Is Better DDR5-4800 . 183.3 |============================================================ DDR5-6000 . 183.3 |============================================================ srsRAN Project 23.10.1-20240325 Test: PDSCH Processor Benchmark, Throughput Total Mbps > Higher Is Better DDR5-4800 . 19592.6 |========================================================== DDR5-6000 . 19454.1 |========================================================== srsRAN Project 23.10.1-20240325 Test: PDSCH Processor Benchmark, Throughput Thread Mbps > Higher Is Better DDR5-4800 . 990.4 |============================================================ DDR5-6000 . 994.0 |============================================================ TensorFlow 2.16.1 Device: CPU - Batch Size: 1 - Model: ResNet-50 images/sec > Higher Is Better DDR5-4800 . 6.96 |============================================================ DDR5-6000 . 7.11 |============================================================= TensorFlow 2.16.1 Device: CPU - Batch Size: 1 - Model: AlexNet images/sec > Higher Is Better DDR5-4800 . 26.12 |============================================================ DDR5-6000 . 25.93 |============================================================ TensorFlow 2.16.1 Device: CPU - Batch Size: 1 - Model: GoogLeNet images/sec > Higher Is Better DDR5-4800 . 22.94 |============================================================ DDR5-6000 . 22.69 |=========================================================== TensorFlow 2.16.1 Device: CPU - Batch Size: 64 - Model: ResNet-50 images/sec > Higher Is Better DDR5-4800 . 134.50 |========================================================== DDR5-6000 . 137.62 |=========================================================== TensorFlow 2.16.1 Device: CPU - Batch Size: 64 - Model: AlexNet images/sec > Higher Is Better DDR5-4800 . 1071.51 |========================================================= DDR5-6000 . 1086.48 |========================================================== TensorFlow 2.16.1 Device: CPU - Batch Size: 64 - Model: GoogLeNet images/sec > Higher Is Better DDR5-4800 . 355.14 |========================================================== DDR5-6000 . 361.38 |=========================================================== TensorFlow 2.16.1 Device: CPU - Batch Size: 256 - Model: ResNet-50 images/sec > Higher Is Better DDR5-4800 . 195.89 |========================================================= DDR5-6000 . 203.33 |=========================================================== TensorFlow 2.16.1 Device: CPU - Batch Size: 256 - Model: AlexNet images/sec > Higher Is Better DDR5-4800 . 2223.51 |========================================================= DDR5-6000 . 2271.95 |========================================================== TensorFlow 2.16.1 Device: CPU - Batch Size: 256 - Model: GoogLeNet images/sec > Higher Is Better DDR5-4800 . 641.12 |========================================================= DDR5-6000 . 659.11 |=========================================================== TensorFlow 2.16.1 Device: CPU - Batch Size: 512 - Model: ResNet-50 images/sec > Higher Is Better DDR5-4800 . 231.71 |======================================================== DDR5-6000 . 246.24 |=========================================================== TensorFlow 2.16.1 Device: CPU - Batch Size: 512 - Model: AlexNet images/sec > Higher Is Better DDR5-4800 . 2644.59 |========================================================== DDR5-6000 . 2665.92 |========================================================== TensorFlow 2.16.1 Device: CPU - Batch Size: 512 - Model: GoogLeNet images/sec > Higher Is Better DDR5-4800 . 780.73 |======================================================== DDR5-6000 . 819.05 |=========================================================== PyTorch 2.2.1 Device: CPU - Batch Size: 1 - Model: ResNet-50 batches/sec > Higher Is Better DDR5-4800 . 51.61 |============================================================ DDR5-6000 . 51.20 |============================================================ PyTorch 2.2.1 Device: CPU - Batch Size: 1 - Model: ResNet-152 batches/sec > Higher Is Better DDR5-4800 . 20.47 |============================================================ DDR5-6000 . 20.24 |=========================================================== PyTorch 2.2.1 Device: CPU - Batch Size: 64 - Model: ResNet-50 batches/sec > Higher Is Better DDR5-4800 . 43.07 |=========================================================== DDR5-6000 . 43.68 |============================================================ PyTorch 2.2.1 Device: CPU - Batch Size: 64 - Model: ResNet-152 batches/sec > Higher Is Better DDR5-4800 . 17.77 |============================================================ DDR5-6000 . 17.46 |=========================================================== PyTorch 2.2.1 Device: CPU - Batch Size: 256 - Model: ResNet-50 batches/sec > Higher Is Better DDR5-4800 . 43.24 |=========================================================== DDR5-6000 . 43.61 |============================================================ PyTorch 2.2.1 Device: CPU - Batch Size: 256 - Model: ResNet-152 batches/sec > Higher Is Better DDR5-4800 . 17.58 |============================================================ DDR5-6000 . 17.42 |=========================================================== PyTorch 2.2.1 Device: CPU - Batch Size: 512 - Model: ResNet-50 batches/sec > Higher Is Better DDR5-4800 . 42.84 |=========================================================== DDR5-6000 . 43.83 |============================================================ PyTorch 2.2.1 Device: CPU - Batch Size: 512 - Model: ResNet-152 batches/sec > Higher Is Better DDR5-4800 . 17.53 |============================================================ DDR5-6000 . 17.49 |============================================================ OpenVINO 2024.0 Model: Face Detection FP16-INT8 - Device: CPU FPS > Higher Is Better DDR5-4800 . 194.14 |=========================================================== DDR5-6000 . 193.80 |=========================================================== OpenVINO 2024.0 Model: Face Detection FP16-INT8 - Device: CPU ms < Lower Is Better DDR5-4800 . 328.94 |=========================================================== DDR5-6000 . 329.53 |=========================================================== OpenVINO 2024.0 Model: Age Gender Recognition Retail 0013 FP16-INT8 - Device: CPU FPS > Higher Is Better DDR5-4800 . 192115.85 |======================================================== DDR5-6000 . 190777.83 |======================================================== OpenVINO 2024.0 Model: Age Gender Recognition Retail 0013 FP16-INT8 - Device: CPU ms < Lower Is Better DDR5-4800 . 0.48 |============================================================= DDR5-6000 . 0.48 |============================================================= OpenVINO 2024.0 Model: Person Detection FP16 - Device: CPU FPS > Higher Is Better DDR5-4800 . 674.46 |====================================================== DDR5-6000 . 733.80 |=========================================================== OpenVINO 2024.0 Model: Person Detection FP16 - Device: CPU ms < Lower Is Better DDR5-4800 . 94.77 |============================================================ DDR5-6000 . 87.14 |======================================================= OpenVINO 2024.0 Model: Weld Porosity Detection FP16-INT8 - Device: CPU FPS > Higher Is Better DDR5-4800 . 18679.63 |========================================================= DDR5-6000 . 18679.36 |========================================================= OpenVINO 2024.0 Model: Weld Porosity Detection FP16-INT8 - Device: CPU ms < Lower Is Better DDR5-4800 . 6.61 |============================================================= DDR5-6000 . 6.61 |============================================================= OpenVINO 2024.0 Model: Vehicle Detection FP16-INT8 - Device: CPU FPS > Higher Is Better DDR5-4800 . 11196.67 |========================================================= DDR5-6000 . 11232.26 |========================================================= OpenVINO 2024.0 Model: Vehicle Detection FP16-INT8 - Device: CPU ms < Lower Is Better DDR5-4800 . 5.63 |============================================================= DDR5-6000 . 5.62 |============================================================= OpenVINO 2024.0 Model: Person Vehicle Bike Detection FP16 - Device: CPU FPS > Higher Is Better DDR5-4800 . 8681.62 |========================================================== DDR5-6000 . 8730.88 |========================================================== OpenVINO 2024.0 Model: Person Vehicle Bike Detection FP16 - Device: CPU ms < Lower Is Better DDR5-4800 . 7.27 |============================================================= DDR5-6000 . 7.22 |============================================================= OpenVINO 2024.0 Model: Machine Translation EN To DE FP16 - Device: CPU FPS > Higher Is Better DDR5-4800 . 1043.31 |======================================================= DDR5-6000 . 1109.75 |========================================================== OpenVINO 2024.0 Model: Machine Translation EN To DE FP16 - Device: CPU ms < Lower Is Better DDR5-4800 . 61.24 |============================================================ DDR5-6000 . 57.57 |======================================================== OpenVINO 2024.0 Model: Face Detection Retail FP16-INT8 - Device: CPU FPS > Higher Is Better DDR5-4800 . 31630.96 |========================================================= DDR5-6000 . 31655.57 |========================================================= OpenVINO 2024.0 Model: Face Detection Retail FP16-INT8 - Device: CPU ms < Lower Is Better DDR5-4800 . 3.87 |============================================================= DDR5-6000 . 3.88 |============================================================= OpenVINO 2024.0 Model: Handwritten English Recognition FP16-INT8 - Device: CPU FPS > Higher Is Better DDR5-4800 . 4776.66 |========================================================== DDR5-6000 . 4774.33 |========================================================== OpenVINO 2024.0 Model: Handwritten English Recognition FP16-INT8 - Device: CPU ms < Lower Is Better DDR5-4800 . 26.65 |============================================================ DDR5-6000 . 26.67 |============================================================ OpenVINO 2024.0 Model: Road Segmentation ADAS FP16-INT8 - Device: CPU FPS > Higher Is Better DDR5-4800 . 3224.72 |========================================================= DDR5-6000 . 3287.43 |========================================================== OpenVINO 2024.0 Model: Road Segmentation ADAS FP16-INT8 - Device: CPU ms < Lower Is Better DDR5-4800 . 19.73 |============================================================ DDR5-6000 . 19.36 |=========================================================== OpenVINO 2024.0 Model: Person Re-Identification Retail FP16 - Device: CPU FPS > Higher Is Better DDR5-4800 . 13918.74 |========================================================= DDR5-6000 . 13949.89 |========================================================= OpenVINO 2024.0 Model: Person Re-Identification Retail FP16 - Device: CPU ms < Lower Is Better DDR5-4800 . 4.49 |============================================================= DDR5-6000 . 4.48 |============================================================= OpenVINO 2024.0 Model: Noise Suppression Poconet-Like FP16 - Device: CPU FPS > Higher Is Better DDR5-4800 . 9833.47 |===================================================== DDR5-6000 . 10557.16 |========================================================= OpenVINO 2024.0 Model: Noise Suppression Poconet-Like FP16 - Device: CPU ms < Lower Is Better DDR5-4800 . 11.09 |============================================================ DDR5-6000 . 10.73 |========================================================== oneDNN 3.4 Harness: Deconvolution Batch shapes_3d - Engine: CPU ms < Lower Is Better DDR5-4800 . 0.507850 |======================================================== DDR5-6000 . 0.513417 |========================================================= ONNX Runtime 1.17 Model: yolov4 - Device: CPU - Executor: Standard Inferences Per Second > Higher Is Better DDR5-4800 . 12.09 |============================================================ DDR5-6000 . 12.07 |============================================================ ONNX Runtime 1.17 Model: yolov4 - Device: CPU - Executor: Standard Inference Time Cost (ms) < Lower Is Better DDR5-4800 . 82.72 |============================================================ DDR5-6000 . 82.87 |============================================================ ONNX Runtime 1.17 Model: yolov4 - Device: CPU - Executor: Parallel Inferences Per Second > Higher Is Better DDR5-4800 . 14.42 |=========================================================== DDR5-6000 . 14.55 |============================================================ ONNX Runtime 1.17 Model: yolov4 - Device: CPU - Executor: Parallel Inference Time Cost (ms) < Lower Is Better DDR5-4800 . 69.36 |============================================================ DDR5-6000 . 68.72 |=========================================================== ONNX Runtime 1.17 Model: fcn-resnet101-11 - Device: CPU - Executor: Parallel Inferences Per Second > Higher Is Better DDR5-4800 . 3.23367 |========================================================== DDR5-6000 . 3.22956 |========================================================== ONNX Runtime 1.17 Model: fcn-resnet101-11 - Device: CPU - Executor: Parallel Inference Time Cost (ms) < Lower Is Better DDR5-4800 . 309.34 |=========================================================== DDR5-6000 . 309.76 |=========================================================== ONNX Runtime 1.17 Model: super-resolution-10 - Device: CPU - Executor: Parallel Inferences Per Second > Higher Is Better DDR5-4800 . 195.17 |=========================================================== DDR5-6000 . 194.26 |=========================================================== ONNX Runtime 1.17 Model: super-resolution-10 - Device: CPU - Executor: Parallel Inference Time Cost (ms) < Lower Is Better DDR5-4800 . 5.12255 |========================================================== DDR5-6000 . 5.14629 |========================================================== ONNX Runtime 1.17 Model: bertsquad-12 - Device: CPU - Executor: Parallel Inferences Per Second > Higher Is Better DDR5-4800 . 24.59 |============================================================ DDR5-6000 . 24.54 |============================================================ ONNX Runtime 1.17 Model: bertsquad-12 - Device: CPU - Executor: Parallel Inference Time Cost (ms) < Lower Is Better DDR5-4800 . 40.67 |============================================================ DDR5-6000 . 40.75 |============================================================ ONNX Runtime 1.17 Model: GPT-2 - Device: CPU - Executor: Standard Inferences Per Second > Higher Is Better DDR5-4800 . 192.35 |========================================================== DDR5-6000 . 194.27 |=========================================================== ONNX Runtime 1.17 Model: GPT-2 - Device: CPU - Executor: Standard Inference Time Cost (ms) < Lower Is Better DDR5-4800 . 5.19672 |========================================================== DDR5-6000 . 5.14539 |========================================================= ONNX Runtime 1.17 Model: ArcFace ResNet-100 - Device: CPU - Executor: Standard Inferences Per Second > Higher Is Better DDR5-4800 . 43.63 |=========================================================== DDR5-6000 . 44.20 |============================================================ ONNX Runtime 1.17 Model: ArcFace ResNet-100 - Device: CPU - Executor: Standard Inference Time Cost (ms) < Lower Is Better DDR5-4800 . 22.94 |============================================================ DDR5-6000 . 22.66 |=========================================================== ONNX Runtime 1.17 Model: ArcFace ResNet-100 - Device: CPU - Executor: Parallel Inferences Per Second > Higher Is Better DDR5-4800 . 41.37 |============================================================ DDR5-6000 . 41.21 |============================================================ ONNX Runtime 1.17 Model: ArcFace ResNet-100 - Device: CPU - Executor: Parallel Inference Time Cost (ms) < Lower Is Better DDR5-4800 . 24.17 |============================================================ DDR5-6000 . 24.27 |============================================================ ONNX Runtime 1.17 Model: CaffeNet 12-int8 - Device: CPU - Executor: Parallel Inferences Per Second > Higher Is Better DDR5-4800 . 957.06 |========================================================== DDR5-6000 . 969.28 |=========================================================== ONNX Runtime 1.17 Model: CaffeNet 12-int8 - Device: CPU - Executor: Parallel Inference Time Cost (ms) < Lower Is Better DDR5-4800 . 1.04331 |========================================================== DDR5-6000 . 1.02998 |========================================================= ONNX Runtime 1.17 Model: T5 Encoder - Device: CPU - Executor: Standard Inferences Per Second > Higher Is Better DDR5-4800 . 234.14 |========================================================== DDR5-6000 . 236.47 |=========================================================== ONNX Runtime 1.17 Model: T5 Encoder - Device: CPU - Executor: Standard Inference Time Cost (ms) < Lower Is Better DDR5-4800 . 4.27007 |========================================================== DDR5-6000 . 4.22823 |========================================================= Llamafile 0.7 Test: llava-v1.5-7b-q4 - Acceleration: CPU Tokens Per Second > Higher Is Better DDR5-4800 . 29.54 |=========================================================== DDR5-6000 . 30.01 |============================================================ Llamafile 0.7 Test: wizardcoder-python-34b-v1.0.Q6_K - Acceleration: CPU Tokens Per Second > Higher Is Better DDR5-4800 . 9.71 |======================================================= DDR5-6000 . 10.64 |============================================================ GNU Octave Benchmark 8.4.0 Seconds < Lower Is Better DDR5-4800 . 4.663 |============================================================ DDR5-6000 . 4.610 |=========================================================== Xmrig 6.21 Variant: GhostRider - Hash Count: 1M H/s > Higher Is Better DDR5-4800 . 18386.4 |====================================================== DDR5-6000 . 19873.0 |========================================================== Helsing 1.0-beta Digit Range: 14 digit Seconds < Lower Is Better DDR5-4800 . 43.44 |============================================================ DDR5-6000 . 43.06 |=========================================================== Stockfish 16.1 Chess Benchmark Nodes Per Second > Higher Is Better DDR5-4800 . 308692581 |======================================================== DDR5-6000 . 307343923 |======================================================== Primesieve 12.1 Length: 1e12 Seconds < Lower Is Better DDR5-4800 . 1.559 |============================================================ DDR5-6000 . 1.553 |============================================================ Primesieve 12.1 Length: 1e13 Seconds < Lower Is Better DDR5-4800 . 17.96 |============================================================ DDR5-6000 . 17.97 |============================================================ Y-Cruncher 0.8.3 Pi Digits To Calculate: 500M Seconds < Lower Is Better DDR5-4800 . 4.843 |============================================================ DDR5-6000 . 4.877 |============================================================ Y-Cruncher 0.8.3 Pi Digits To Calculate: 1B Seconds < Lower Is Better DDR5-4800 . 8.113 |============================================================ DDR5-6000 . 8.173 |============================================================ ASKAP 1.0 Test: tConvolve MT - Degridding Million Grid Points Per Second > Higher Is Better DDR5-4800 . 22665.1 |================================================ DDR5-6000 . 27297.4 |==========================================================