ssss AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3970X 32-Core testing with a ASUS ROG ZENITH II EXTREME (1802 BIOS) and AMD Radeon RX 5700 8GB on Ubuntu 22.04 via the Phoronix Test Suite. a: Processor: AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3970X 32-Core @ 3.70GHz (32 Cores / 64 Threads), Motherboard: ASUS ROG ZENITH II EXTREME (1802 BIOS), Chipset: AMD Starship/Matisse, Memory: 4 x 16GB DDR4-3600MT/s Corsair CMT64GX4M4Z3600C16, Disk: Samsung SSD 980 PRO 500GB, Graphics: AMD Radeon RX 5700 8GB, Audio: AMD Navi 10 HDMI Audio, Monitor: ASUS VP28U, Network: Aquantia AQC107 NBase-T/IEEE + Intel I211 + Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200 OS: Ubuntu 22.04, Kernel: 6.8.0-40-generic (x86_64), Desktop: GNOME Shell 42.9, Display Server: X Server + Wayland, OpenGL: 4.6 Mesa 22.0.1 (LLVM 13.0.1 DRM 3.57), Vulkan: 1.2.204, Compiler: GCC 11.4.0, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 3840x2160 b: Processor: AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3970X 32-Core @ 3.70GHz (32 Cores / 64 Threads), Motherboard: ASUS ROG ZENITH II EXTREME (1802 BIOS), Chipset: AMD Starship/Matisse, Memory: 4 x 16GB DDR4-3600MT/s Corsair CMT64GX4M4Z3600C16, Disk: Samsung SSD 980 PRO 500GB, Graphics: AMD Radeon RX 5700 8GB, Audio: AMD Navi 10 HDMI Audio, Monitor: ASUS VP28U, Network: Aquantia AQC107 NBase-T/IEEE + Intel I211 + Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200 OS: Ubuntu 22.04, Kernel: 6.8.0-40-generic (x86_64), Desktop: GNOME Shell 42.9, Display Server: X Server + Wayland, OpenGL: 4.6 Mesa 22.0.1 (LLVM 13.0.1 DRM 3.57), Vulkan: 1.2.204, Compiler: GCC 11.4.0, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 3840x2160 NAMD 3.0 Input: ATPase with 327,506 Atoms ns/day > Higher Is Better a . 1.99444 |================================================================== b . 1.99177 |================================================================== NAMD 3.0 Input: STMV with 1,066,628 Atoms ns/day > Higher Is Better a . 0.55826 |================================================================== b . 0.55862 |================================================================== Epoch 4.19.4 Epoch3D Deck: Cone Seconds < Lower Is Better a . 358.69 |=================================================================== b . 358.37 |=================================================================== Apache CouchDB 3.4.1 Bulk Size: 100 - Inserts: 1000 - Rounds: 30 Seconds < Lower Is Better a . 126.23 |=================================================================== b . 124.50 |================================================================== Apache CouchDB 3.4.1 Bulk Size: 100 - Inserts: 3000 - Rounds: 30 Seconds < Lower Is Better a . 414.02 |=================================================================== b . 410.52 |================================================================== Apache CouchDB 3.4.1 Bulk Size: 300 - Inserts: 1000 - Rounds: 30 Seconds < Lower Is Better a . 197.82 |=================================================================== b . 199.00 |=================================================================== Apache CouchDB 3.4.1 Bulk Size: 300 - Inserts: 3000 - Rounds: 30 Seconds < Lower Is Better a . 626.93 |=================================================================== b . 626.87 |=================================================================== Apache CouchDB 3.4.1 Bulk Size: 500 - Inserts: 1000 - Rounds: 30 Seconds < Lower Is Better a . 3641.99 |================================================================== Valkey 8.0 Test: GET - Parallel Connections: 800 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better a . 860143.00 |================================================================ b . 580241.31 |=========================================== Valkey 8.0 Test: SET - Parallel Connections: 800 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better a . 328995.38 |================================================================ b . 327149.28 |================================================================ Valkey 8.0 Test: GET - Parallel Connections: 1000 Valkey 8.0 Test: SET - Parallel Connections: 1000 PostgreSQL 17 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better a . 1425904 |================================================================== b . 1417246 |================================================================== PostgreSQL 17 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better a . 0.351 |==================================================================== b . 0.353 |==================================================================== PostgreSQL 17 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 800 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better a . 1291247 |================================================================== b . 1285751 |================================================================== PostgreSQL 17 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 800 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better a . 0.620 |==================================================================== b . 0.622 |==================================================================== PostgreSQL 17 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 1000 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better a . 1217032 |================================================================== b . 1192240 |================================================================= PostgreSQL 17 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 1000 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better a . 0.822 |=================================================================== b . 0.839 |==================================================================== PostgreSQL 17 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better a . 10637 |==================================================================== b . 9561 |============================================================= PostgreSQL 17 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better a . 47.00 |============================================================= b . 52.29 |==================================================================== PostgreSQL 17 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 800 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better a . 11212 |==================================================================== b . 9649 |=========================================================== PostgreSQL 17 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 800 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better a . 71.35 |=========================================================== b . 82.91 |==================================================================== PostgreSQL 17 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better a . 1002453 |================================================================== b . 888839 |=========================================================== PostgreSQL 17 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better a . 0.499 |============================================================ b . 0.563 |==================================================================== PostgreSQL 17 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 800 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better a . 920890 |=================================================================== b . 852990 |============================================================== PostgreSQL 17 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 800 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better a . 0.869 |=============================================================== b . 0.938 |==================================================================== PostgreSQL 17 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 1000 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better a . 10826 |==================================================================== b . 9363 |=========================================================== PostgreSQL 17 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 1000 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better a . 92.37 |========================================================== b . 106.80 |=================================================================== PostgreSQL 17 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 1000 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better a . 880821 |=================================================================== b . 313679 |======================== PostgreSQL 17 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 1000 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better a . 1.135 |======================== b . 3.188 |==================================================================== PostgreSQL 17 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better a . 9855 |===================================================================== b . 6932 |================================================= PostgreSQL 17 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better a . 50.74 |================================================ b . 72.13 |==================================================================== PostgreSQL 17 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 800 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better a . 10101 |==================================================================== b . 6460 |=========================================== PostgreSQL 17 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 800 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better a . 79.20 |=========================================== b . 123.84 |=================================================================== PostgreSQL 17 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 1000 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better a . 10512 |==================================================================== b . 7285 |=============================================== PostgreSQL 17 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 1000 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better a . 95.13 |============================================== b . 137.27 |=================================================================== Apache Cassandra 5.0 Test: Writes Op/s > Higher Is Better