benchmark_20241010_121529 Automated benchmark graph-clear-linux-ex130s: Processor: Intel Xeon Gold 5412U @ 3.90GHz (24 Cores / 48 Threads), Motherboard: ASRockRack SPC741D8UD-2T/X550/H (2.07.HZ04 BIOS), Chipset: Intel Device 1bce, Memory: 4 x 32 GB DDR5-4400MT/s Samsung M321R4GA3BB6-CQKVS, Disk: 2 x 3841GB INTEL SSDPF2KX038T1, Graphics: ASPEED, Network: 2 x Intel X550 OS: Clear Linux OS 42410, Kernel: 6.10.9-1462.native (x86_64), Display Server: X Server, Compiler: GCC 14.2.1 20241002 releases/gcc-14.2.0-204-ge69c03971a + Clang 19.1.0 + LLVM 19.1.0, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 1920x1200 Coremark 1.0 CoreMark Size 666 - Iterations Per Second Iterations/Sec > Higher Is Better graph-clear-linux-ex130s . 924233.62 |========================================= FS-Mark 3.3 Test: 1000 Files, 1MB Size Files/s > Higher Is Better graph-clear-linux-ex130s . 1552.8 |============================================ FS-Mark 3.3 Test: 5000 Files, 1MB Size, 4 Threads Files/s > Higher Is Better graph-clear-linux-ex130s . 3076.8 |============================================ FS-Mark 3.3 Test: 4000 Files, 32 Sub Dirs, 1MB Size Files/s > Higher Is Better graph-clear-linux-ex130s . 1593.8 |============================================ FS-Mark 3.3 Test: 1000 Files, 1MB Size, No Sync/FSync Files/s > Higher Is Better graph-clear-linux-ex130s . 3350.5 |============================================ IOzone 3.465 Record Size: 1MB - File Size: 2GB - Disk Test: Read Performance MB/s > Higher Is Better graph-clear-linux-ex130s . 8636.98 |=========================================== IOzone 3.465 Record Size: 1MB - File Size: 4GB - Disk Test: Read Performance MB/s > Higher Is Better graph-clear-linux-ex130s . 8720.72 |=========================================== IOzone 3.465 Record Size: 1MB - File Size: 8GB - Disk Test: Read Performance MB/s > Higher Is Better graph-clear-linux-ex130s . 9078.81 |=========================================== IOzone 3.465 Record Size: 2MB - File Size: 2GB - Disk Test: Read Performance MB/s > Higher Is Better graph-clear-linux-ex130s . 8188.98 |=========================================== IOzone 3.465 Record Size: 2MB - File Size: 4GB - Disk Test: Read Performance MB/s > Higher Is Better graph-clear-linux-ex130s . 8373.18 |=========================================== IOzone 3.465 Record Size: 2MB - File Size: 8GB - Disk Test: Read Performance MB/s > Higher Is Better graph-clear-linux-ex130s . 8730.25 |=========================================== IOzone 3.465 Record Size: 4Kb - File Size: 2GB - Disk Test: Read Performance MB/s > Higher Is Better graph-clear-linux-ex130s . 7053.72 |=========================================== IOzone 3.465 Record Size: 4Kb - File Size: 4GB - Disk Test: Read Performance MB/s > Higher Is Better graph-clear-linux-ex130s . 7401.82 |=========================================== IOzone 3.465 Record Size: 4Kb - File Size: 8GB - Disk Test: Read Performance MB/s > Higher Is Better graph-clear-linux-ex130s . 7601.04 |=========================================== IOzone 3.465 Record Size: 1MB - File Size: 2GB - Disk Test: Write Performance MB/s > Higher Is Better graph-clear-linux-ex130s . 1640.20 |=========================================== IOzone 3.465 Record Size: 1MB - File Size: 4GB - Disk Test: Write Performance MB/s > Higher Is Better graph-clear-linux-ex130s . 1661.90 |=========================================== IOzone 3.465 Record Size: 1MB - File Size: 8GB - Disk Test: Write Performance MB/s > Higher Is Better graph-clear-linux-ex130s . 1705.77 |=========================================== IOzone 3.465 Record Size: 2MB - File Size: 2GB - Disk Test: Write Performance MB/s > Higher Is Better graph-clear-linux-ex130s . 1650.39 |=========================================== IOzone 3.465 Record Size: 2MB - File Size: 4GB - Disk Test: Write Performance MB/s > Higher Is Better graph-clear-linux-ex130s . 1702.51 |=========================================== IOzone 3.465 Record Size: 2MB - File Size: 8GB - Disk Test: Write Performance MB/s > Higher Is Better graph-clear-linux-ex130s . 1709.24 |=========================================== IOzone 3.465 Record Size: 4Kb - File Size: 2GB - Disk Test: Write Performance MB/s > Higher Is Better graph-clear-linux-ex130s . 62.59 |============================================= IOzone 3.465 Record Size: 4Kb - File Size: 4GB - Disk Test: Write Performance MB/s > Higher Is Better graph-clear-linux-ex130s . 62.36 |============================================= IOzone 3.465 Record Size: 4Kb - File Size: 8GB - Disk Test: Write Performance MB/s > Higher Is Better graph-clear-linux-ex130s . 62.06 |============================================= IOzone 3.465 Record Size: 64Kb - File Size: 2GB - Disk Test: Read Performance MB/s > Higher Is Better graph-clear-linux-ex130s . 8420.03 |=========================================== IOzone 3.465 Record Size: 64Kb - File Size: 4GB - Disk Test: Read Performance MB/s > Higher Is Better graph-clear-linux-ex130s . 8927.51 |=========================================== IOzone 3.465 Record Size: 64Kb - File Size: 8GB - Disk Test: Read Performance MB/s > Higher Is Better graph-clear-linux-ex130s . 9234.80 |=========================================== IOzone 3.465 Record Size: 1MB - File Size: 512MB - Disk Test: Read Performance MB/s > Higher Is Better graph-clear-linux-ex130s . 8600.83 |=========================================== IOzone 3.465 Record Size: 2MB - File Size: 512MB - Disk Test: Read Performance MB/s > Higher Is Better graph-clear-linux-ex130s . 7857.25 |=========================================== IOzone 3.465 Record Size: 4Kb - File Size: 512MB - Disk Test: Read Performance MB/s > Higher Is Better graph-clear-linux-ex130s . 7286.23 |=========================================== IOzone 3.465 Record Size: 64Kb - File Size: 2GB - Disk Test: Write Performance MB/s > Higher Is Better graph-clear-linux-ex130s . 643.27 |============================================ IOzone 3.465 Record Size: 64Kb - File Size: 4GB - Disk Test: Write Performance MB/s > Higher Is Better graph-clear-linux-ex130s . 627.19 |============================================ IOzone 3.465 Record Size: 64Kb - File Size: 8GB - Disk Test: Write Performance MB/s > Higher Is Better graph-clear-linux-ex130s . 641.47 |============================================ IOzone 3.465 Record Size: 1MB - File Size: 512MB - Disk Test: Write Performance MB/s > Higher Is Better graph-clear-linux-ex130s . 1665.41 |=========================================== IOzone 3.465 Record Size: 2MB - File Size: 512MB - Disk Test: Write Performance MB/s > Higher Is Better graph-clear-linux-ex130s . 1728.92 |=========================================== IOzone 3.465 Record Size: 4Kb - File Size: 512MB - Disk Test: Write Performance MB/s > Higher Is Better graph-clear-linux-ex130s . 62.17 |============================================= IOzone 3.465 Record Size: 64Kb - File Size: 512MB - Disk Test: Read Performance MB/s > Higher Is Better graph-clear-linux-ex130s . 8459.83 |=========================================== IOzone 3.465 Record Size: 64Kb - File Size: 512MB - Disk Test: Write Performance MB/s > Higher Is Better graph-clear-linux-ex130s . 637.69 |============================================ Numpy Benchmark Score > Higher Is Better graph-clear-linux-ex130s . 548.50 |============================================ RAMspeed SMP 3.5.0 Type: Add - Benchmark: Integer MB/s > Higher Is Better graph-clear-linux-ex130s . 41054.33 |========================================== RAMspeed SMP 3.5.0 Type: Copy - Benchmark: Integer MB/s > Higher Is Better graph-clear-linux-ex130s . 43281.70 |========================================== RAMspeed SMP 3.5.0 Type: Scale - Benchmark: Integer MB/s > Higher Is Better graph-clear-linux-ex130s . 41087.12 |========================================== RAMspeed SMP 3.5.0 Type: Triad - Benchmark: Integer MB/s > Higher Is Better graph-clear-linux-ex130s . 38912.83 |========================================== RAMspeed SMP 3.5.0 Type: Average - Benchmark: Integer MB/s > Higher Is Better graph-clear-linux-ex130s . 40209.64 |========================================== RAMspeed SMP 3.5.0 Type: Add - Benchmark: Floating Point MB/s > Higher Is Better graph-clear-linux-ex130s . 40409.76 |========================================== RAMspeed SMP 3.5.0 Type: Copy - Benchmark: Floating Point MB/s > Higher Is Better graph-clear-linux-ex130s . 43699.73 |========================================== RAMspeed SMP 3.5.0 Type: Scale - Benchmark: Floating Point MB/s > Higher Is Better graph-clear-linux-ex130s . 43813.53 |========================================== RAMspeed SMP 3.5.0 Type: Triad - Benchmark: Floating Point MB/s > Higher Is Better graph-clear-linux-ex130s . 40860.10 |========================================== RAMspeed SMP 3.5.0 Type: Average - Benchmark: Floating Point MB/s > Higher Is Better graph-clear-linux-ex130s . 42024.08 |========================================== Redis 7.0.4 Test: GET - Parallel Connections: 50 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better graph-clear-linux-ex130s . 4048574.73 |======================================== Redis 7.0.4 Test: SET - Parallel Connections: 50 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better graph-clear-linux-ex130s . 2571357.92 |======================================== Redis 7.0.4 Test: GET - Parallel Connections: 500 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better graph-clear-linux-ex130s . 2922268.77 |======================================== Redis 7.0.4 Test: LPOP - Parallel Connections: 50 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better graph-clear-linux-ex130s . 4003312.29 |======================================== Redis 7.0.4 Test: SADD - Parallel Connections: 50 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better graph-clear-linux-ex130s . 2784669.08 |======================================== Redis 7.0.4 Test: SET - Parallel Connections: 500 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better graph-clear-linux-ex130s . 2237932.81 |======================================== Redis 7.0.4 Test: GET - Parallel Connections: 1000 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better graph-clear-linux-ex130s . 2976662.5 |========================================= Redis 7.0.4 Test: LPOP - Parallel Connections: 500 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better graph-clear-linux-ex130s . 3397145.33 |======================================== Redis 7.0.4 Test: LPUSH - Parallel Connections: 50 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better graph-clear-linux-ex130s . 2493301.47 |======================================== Redis 7.0.4 Test: SADD - Parallel Connections: 500 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better graph-clear-linux-ex130s . 2527959.70 |======================================== Redis 7.0.4 Test: SET - Parallel Connections: 1000 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better graph-clear-linux-ex130s . 2315964.2 |========================================= Redis 7.0.4 Test: LPOP - Parallel Connections: 1000 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better graph-clear-linux-ex130s . 1963712.93 |======================================== Redis 7.0.4 Test: LPUSH - Parallel Connections: 500 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better graph-clear-linux-ex130s . 2320278.58 |======================================== Redis 7.0.4 Test: SADD - Parallel Connections: 1000 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better graph-clear-linux-ex130s . 2608946.00 |======================================== Redis 7.0.4 Test: LPUSH - Parallel Connections: 1000 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better graph-clear-linux-ex130s . 2092478.40 |======================================== Smallpt 1.0 Global Illumination Renderer; 128 Samples Seconds < Lower Is Better graph-clear-linux-ex130s . 3.502 |============================================= SQLite 3.41.2 Threads / Copies: 1 Seconds < Lower Is Better SQLite 3.41.2 Threads / Copies: 2 Seconds < Lower Is Better SQLite 3.41.2 Threads / Copies: 4 Seconds < Lower Is Better SQLite 3.41.2 Threads / Copies: 8 Seconds < Lower Is Better graph-clear-linux-ex130s . 2.352 |============================================= SQLite 3.41.2 Threads / Copies: 16 Seconds < Lower Is Better graph-clear-linux-ex130s . 3.635 |============================================= SQLite 3.41.2 Threads / Copies: 32 Seconds < Lower Is Better graph-clear-linux-ex130s . 5.731 |============================================= SQLite 3.41.2 Threads / Copies: 48 Seconds < Lower Is Better graph-clear-linux-ex130s . 8.287 |============================================= Stockfish 17 Chess Benchmark Nodes Per Second > Higher Is Better graph-clear-linux-ex130s . 50248727 |========================================== Stream 2013-01-17 Type: Copy MB/s > Higher Is Better graph-clear-linux-ex130s . 108423.8 |========================================== Stream 2013-01-17 Type: Scale MB/s > Higher Is Better graph-clear-linux-ex130s . 109465.8 |========================================== Stream 2013-01-17 Type: Triad MB/s > Higher Is Better graph-clear-linux-ex130s . 112156.1 |========================================== Stream 2013-01-17 Type: Add MB/s > Higher Is Better graph-clear-linux-ex130s . 111824.9 |========================================== Sysbench 1.0.20 Test: RAM / Memory MiB/sec > Higher Is Better graph-clear-linux-ex130s . 17046.71 |========================================== Sysbench 1.0.20 Test: CPU Events Per Second > Higher Is Better graph-clear-linux-ex130s . 56718.99 |========================================== TensorFlow 2.16.1 Device: CPU - Batch Size: 1 - Model: VGG-16 images/sec > Higher Is Better graph-clear-linux-ex130s . 9.98 |============================================== TensorFlow 2.16.1 Device: GPU - Batch Size: 1 - Model: VGG-16 images/sec > Higher Is Better graph-clear-linux-ex130s . 2.47 |============================================== TensorFlow 2.16.1 Device: CPU - Batch Size: 1 - Model: AlexNet images/sec > Higher Is Better graph-clear-linux-ex130s . 32.22 |============================================= TensorFlow 2.16.1 Device: CPU - Batch Size: 16 - Model: VGG-16 images/sec > Higher Is Better graph-clear-linux-ex130s . 25.90 |============================================= TensorFlow 2.16.1 Device: CPU - Batch Size: 32 - Model: VGG-16 images/sec > Higher Is Better graph-clear-linux-ex130s . 26.12 |============================================= TensorFlow 2.16.1 Device: CPU - Batch Size: 64 - Model: VGG-16 images/sec > Higher Is Better graph-clear-linux-ex130s . 27.07 |============================================= TensorFlow 2.16.1 Device: GPU - Batch Size: 1 - Model: AlexNet images/sec > Higher Is Better graph-clear-linux-ex130s . 12.70 |============================================= TensorFlow 2.16.1 Device: GPU - Batch Size: 16 - Model: VGG-16 images/sec > Higher Is Better graph-clear-linux-ex130s . 3.36 |============================================== TensorFlow 2.16.1 Device: GPU - Batch Size: 32 - Model: VGG-16 images/sec > Higher Is Better graph-clear-linux-ex130s . 3.43 |============================================== TensorFlow 2.16.1 Device: GPU - Batch Size: 64 - Model: VGG-16 images/sec > Higher Is Better graph-clear-linux-ex130s . 3.47 |============================================== TensorFlow 2.16.1 Device: CPU - Batch Size: 16 - Model: AlexNet images/sec > Higher Is Better graph-clear-linux-ex130s . 290.52 |============================================ TensorFlow 2.16.1 Device: CPU - Batch Size: 256 - Model: VGG-16 images/sec > Higher Is Better graph-clear-linux-ex130s . 27.57 |============================================= TensorFlow 2.16.1 Device: CPU - Batch Size: 32 - Model: AlexNet images/sec > Higher Is Better graph-clear-linux-ex130s . 401.72 |============================================ TensorFlow 2.16.1 Device: CPU - Batch Size: 512 - Model: VGG-16 images/sec > Higher Is Better graph-clear-linux-ex130s . 27.36 |============================================= TensorFlow 2.16.1 Device: CPU - Batch Size: 64 - Model: AlexNet images/sec > Higher Is Better graph-clear-linux-ex130s . 483.49 |============================================ TensorFlow 2.16.1 Device: GPU - Batch Size: 16 - Model: AlexNet images/sec > Higher Is Better graph-clear-linux-ex130s . 49.83 |============================================= TensorFlow 2.16.1 Device: GPU - Batch Size: 256 - Model: VGG-16 images/sec > Higher Is Better graph-clear-linux-ex130s . 3.52 |============================================== TensorFlow 2.16.1 Device: GPU - Batch Size: 32 - Model: AlexNet images/sec > Higher Is Better graph-clear-linux-ex130s . 57.34 |============================================= TensorFlow 2.16.1 Device: GPU - Batch Size: 512 - Model: VGG-16 images/sec > Higher Is Better graph-clear-linux-ex130s . 3.52 |============================================== TensorFlow 2.16.1 Device: GPU - Batch Size: 64 - Model: AlexNet images/sec > Higher Is Better graph-clear-linux-ex130s . 60.42 |============================================= TensorFlow 2.16.1 Device: CPU - Batch Size: 1 - Model: GoogLeNet images/sec > Higher Is Better graph-clear-linux-ex130s . 55.85 |============================================= TensorFlow 2.16.1 Device: CPU - Batch Size: 1 - Model: ResNet-50 images/sec > Higher Is Better graph-clear-linux-ex130s . 16.41 |============================================= TensorFlow 2.16.1 Device: CPU - Batch Size: 256 - Model: AlexNet images/sec > Higher Is Better graph-clear-linux-ex130s . 574.21 |============================================ TensorFlow 2.16.1 Device: CPU - Batch Size: 512 - Model: AlexNet images/sec > Higher Is Better graph-clear-linux-ex130s . 594.20 |============================================ TensorFlow 2.16.1 Device: GPU - Batch Size: 1 - Model: GoogLeNet images/sec > Higher Is Better graph-clear-linux-ex130s . 26.54 |============================================= TensorFlow 2.16.1 Device: GPU - Batch Size: 1 - Model: ResNet-50 images/sec > Higher Is Better graph-clear-linux-ex130s . 7.75 |============================================== TensorFlow 2.16.1 Device: GPU - Batch Size: 256 - Model: AlexNet images/sec > Higher Is Better graph-clear-linux-ex130s . 66.02 |============================================= TensorFlow 2.16.1 Device: GPU - Batch Size: 512 - Model: AlexNet images/sec > Higher Is Better graph-clear-linux-ex130s . 66.72 |============================================= TensorFlow 2.16.1 Device: CPU - Batch Size: 16 - Model: GoogLeNet images/sec > Higher Is Better graph-clear-linux-ex130s . 189.16 |============================================ TensorFlow 2.16.1 Device: CPU - Batch Size: 16 - Model: ResNet-50 images/sec > Higher Is Better graph-clear-linux-ex130s . 56.05 |============================================= TensorFlow 2.16.1 Device: CPU - Batch Size: 32 - Model: GoogLeNet images/sec > Higher Is Better graph-clear-linux-ex130s . 204.44 |============================================ TensorFlow 2.16.1 Device: CPU - Batch Size: 32 - Model: ResNet-50 images/sec > Higher Is Better graph-clear-linux-ex130s . 62.50 |============================================= TensorFlow 2.16.1 Device: CPU - Batch Size: 64 - Model: GoogLeNet images/sec > Higher Is Better graph-clear-linux-ex130s . 214.06 |============================================ TensorFlow 2.16.1 Device: CPU - Batch Size: 64 - Model: ResNet-50 images/sec > Higher Is Better graph-clear-linux-ex130s . 66.77 |============================================= TensorFlow 2.16.1 Device: GPU - Batch Size: 16 - Model: GoogLeNet images/sec > Higher Is Better graph-clear-linux-ex130s . 34.57 |============================================= TensorFlow 2.16.1 Device: GPU - Batch Size: 16 - Model: ResNet-50 images/sec > Higher Is Better graph-clear-linux-ex130s . 9.68 |============================================== TensorFlow 2.16.1 Device: GPU - Batch Size: 32 - Model: GoogLeNet images/sec > Higher Is Better graph-clear-linux-ex130s . 34.39 |============================================= TensorFlow 2.16.1 Device: GPU - Batch Size: 32 - Model: ResNet-50 images/sec > Higher Is Better graph-clear-linux-ex130s . 9.92 |============================================== TensorFlow 2.16.1 Device: GPU - Batch Size: 64 - Model: GoogLeNet images/sec > Higher Is Better graph-clear-linux-ex130s . 34.47 |============================================= TensorFlow 2.16.1 Device: GPU - Batch Size: 64 - Model: ResNet-50 images/sec > Higher Is Better graph-clear-linux-ex130s . 10.00 |============================================= TensorFlow 2.16.1 Device: CPU - Batch Size: 256 - Model: GoogLeNet images/sec > Higher Is Better graph-clear-linux-ex130s . 216.39 |============================================ TensorFlow 2.16.1 Device: CPU - Batch Size: 256 - Model: ResNet-50 images/sec > Higher Is Better graph-clear-linux-ex130s . 66.75 |============================================= TensorFlow 2.16.1 Device: CPU - Batch Size: 512 - Model: GoogLeNet images/sec > Higher Is Better graph-clear-linux-ex130s . 215.58 |============================================ TensorFlow 2.16.1 Device: CPU - Batch Size: 512 - Model: ResNet-50 images/sec > Higher Is Better graph-clear-linux-ex130s . 68.23 |============================================= TensorFlow 2.16.1 Device: GPU - Batch Size: 256 - Model: GoogLeNet images/sec > Higher Is Better graph-clear-linux-ex130s . 35.08 |============================================= TensorFlow 2.16.1 Device: GPU - Batch Size: 256 - Model: ResNet-50 images/sec > Higher Is Better graph-clear-linux-ex130s . 10.22 |============================================= TensorFlow 2.16.1 Device: GPU - Batch Size: 512 - Model: GoogLeNet images/sec > Higher Is Better graph-clear-linux-ex130s . 35.41 |============================================= TensorFlow 2.16.1 Device: GPU - Batch Size: 512 - Model: ResNet-50 images/sec > Higher Is Better graph-clear-linux-ex130s . 10.21 |============================================= Timed Linux Kernel Compilation 6.8 Build: defconfig Seconds < Lower Is Better graph-clear-linux-ex130s . 64.19 |============================================= Timed Linux Kernel Compilation 6.8 Build: allmodconfig Seconds < Lower Is Better Timed LLVM Compilation 16.0 Build System: Ninja Seconds < Lower Is Better graph-clear-linux-ex130s . 392.29 |============================================ Timed LLVM Compilation 16.0 Build System: Unix Makefiles Seconds < Lower Is Better graph-clear-linux-ex130s . 455.93 |============================================