new eo sep Tests for a future article. Intel Core i9-14900K testing with a ASUS PRIME Z790-P WIFI (1662 BIOS) and XFX AMD Radeon RX 7900 XTX 24GB on Ubuntu 24.04 via the Phoronix Test Suite. a: Processor: Intel Core i9-14900K @ 5.70GHz (24 Cores / 32 Threads), Motherboard: ASUS PRIME Z790-P WIFI (1662 BIOS), Chipset: Intel Raptor Lake-S PCH, Memory: 2 x 16GB DDR5-6000MT/s Corsair CMK32GX5M2B6000C36, Disk: Western Digital WD_BLACK SN850X 2000GB, Graphics: XFX AMD Radeon RX 7900 XTX 24GB, Audio: Realtek ALC897, Monitor: ASUS VP28U OS: Ubuntu 24.04, Kernel: 6.10.0-061000rc6daily20240706-generic (x86_64), Desktop: GNOME Shell 46.0, Display Server: X Server 1.21.1.11 + Wayland, OpenGL: 4.6 Mesa 24.2~git2407080600.801ed4~oibaf~n (git-801ed4d 2024-07-08 noble-oibaf-ppa) (LLVM 17.0.6 DRM 3.57), Compiler: GCC 13.2.0, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 3840x2160 b: Processor: Intel Core i9-14900K @ 5.70GHz (24 Cores / 32 Threads), Motherboard: ASUS PRIME Z790-P WIFI (1662 BIOS), Chipset: Intel Raptor Lake-S PCH, Memory: 2 x 16GB DDR5-6000MT/s Corsair CMK32GX5M2B6000C36, Disk: Western Digital WD_BLACK SN850X 2000GB, Graphics: XFX AMD Radeon RX 7900 XTX 24GB, Audio: Realtek ALC897, Monitor: ASUS VP28U OS: Ubuntu 24.04, Kernel: 6.10.0-061000rc6daily20240706-generic (x86_64), Desktop: GNOME Shell 46.0, Display Server: X Server 1.21.1.11 + Wayland, OpenGL: 4.6 Mesa 24.2~git2407080600.801ed4~oibaf~n (git-801ed4d 2024-07-08 noble-oibaf-ppa) (LLVM 17.0.6 DRM 3.57), Compiler: GCC 13.2.0, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 3840x2160 NAMD 3.0 Input: ATPase with 327,506 Atoms ns/day > Higher Is Better a . 1.50934 |================================================================== b . 1.44454 |=============================================================== NAMD 3.0 Input: STMV with 1,066,628 Atoms ns/day > Higher Is Better a . 0.44193 |================================================================== b . 0.43668 |================================================================= Opus Codec Encoding 1.5.2 WAV To Opus Encode Seconds < Lower Is Better a . 16.50 |==================================================================== b . 16.60 |==================================================================== Apache CouchDB 3.4.1 Bulk Size: 100 - Inserts: 1000 - Rounds: 30 Seconds < Lower Is Better a . 72.11 |==================================================================== b . 72.43 |==================================================================== Apache CouchDB 3.4.1 Bulk Size: 100 - Inserts: 3000 - Rounds: 30 Seconds < Lower Is Better a . 243.01 |=================================================================== b . 243.54 |=================================================================== Apache CouchDB 3.4.1 Bulk Size: 300 - Inserts: 1000 - Rounds: 30 Seconds < Lower Is Better a . 125.10 |================================================================== b . 126.22 |=================================================================== Apache CouchDB 3.4.1 Bulk Size: 300 - Inserts: 3000 - Rounds: 30 Seconds < Lower Is Better a . 415.06 |=================================================================== b . 412.33 |=================================================================== Apache CouchDB 3.4.1 Bulk Size: 500 - Inserts: 1000 - Rounds: 30 Seconds < Lower Is Better a . 171.93 |================================================================== b . 174.77 |=================================================================== Apache CouchDB 3.4.1 Bulk Size: 500 - Inserts: 3000 - Rounds: 30 Seconds < Lower Is Better a . 577.69 |================================================================== b . 582.85 |=================================================================== Valkey 8.0 Test: GET - Parallel Connections: 500 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better a . 2206921.25 |=============================================================== b . 1050057.38 |============================== Valkey 8.0 Test: GET - Parallel Connections: 800 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better a . 2180293.00 |=============================================================== b . 996891.12 |============================= Valkey 8.0 Test: SET - Parallel Connections: 500 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better a . 565466.25 |============================================================== b . 581830.00 |================================================================ Valkey 8.0 Test: SET - Parallel Connections: 800 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better a . 589572.06 |================================================================ b . 576157.62 |=============================================================== Valkey 8.0 Test: GET - Parallel Connections: 1000 Valkey 8.0 Test: HSET - Parallel Connections: 500 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better a . 531340.88 |============================================================= b . 558097.25 |================================================================ Valkey 8.0 Test: HSET - Parallel Connections: 800 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better a . 549356.69 |================================================================ b . 545810.12 |================================================================ Valkey 8.0 Test: INCR - Parallel Connections: 500 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better a . 1318624.12 |=============================================================== b . 1215504.62 |========================================================== Valkey 8.0 Test: INCR - Parallel Connections: 800 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better a . 1268332.88 |==================================================== b . 1525326.75 |=============================================================== Valkey 8.0 Test: LPOP - Parallel Connections: 500 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better a . 2503249.0 |================================================================ b . 2509040.5 |================================================================ Valkey 8.0 Test: LPOP - Parallel Connections: 800 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better a . 2436962.75 |============================================================== b . 2464601.50 |=============================================================== Valkey 8.0 Test: SADD - Parallel Connections: 500 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better a . 1117527.0 |================================================================ b . 1056597.5 |============================================================= Valkey 8.0 Test: SADD - Parallel Connections: 800 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better a . 1249156.12 |============================================================= b . 1299006.00 |=============================================================== Valkey 8.0 Test: SET - Parallel Connections: 1000 Valkey 8.0 Test: SPOP - Parallel Connections: 500 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better a . 2361924 |================================================================== b . 2377525 |================================================================== Valkey 8.0 Test: SPOP - Parallel Connections: 800 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better a . 2565776.5 |================================================================ b . 2536380.5 |=============================================================== Valkey 8.0 Test: HSET - Parallel Connections: 1000 Valkey 8.0 Test: INCR - Parallel Connections: 1000 Valkey 8.0 Test: LPOP - Parallel Connections: 1000 Valkey 8.0 Test: SADD - Parallel Connections: 1000 Valkey 8.0 Test: SPOP - Parallel Connections: 1000 PostgreSQL 17 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better a . 1826106 |================================================================== b . 1767852 |================================================================ PostgreSQL 17 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better a . 0.137 |================================================================== b . 0.141 |==================================================================== PostgreSQL 17 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better a . 1521129 |================================================================== b . 1517531 |================================================================== PostgreSQL 17 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better a . 0.329 |==================================================================== b . 0.329 |==================================================================== PostgreSQL 17 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 800 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better a . 1197470 |================================================================== b . 1168091 |================================================================ PostgreSQL 17 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 800 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better a . 0.668 |================================================================== b . 0.685 |==================================================================== PostgreSQL 17 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 1000 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better a . 979078 |================================================================== b . 987642 |=================================================================== PostgreSQL 17 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 1000 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better a . 1.021 |==================================================================== b . 1.013 |=================================================================== PostgreSQL 17 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better a . 1208 |===================================================================== b . 1208 |===================================================================== PostgreSQL 17 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better a . 206.98 |=================================================================== b . 206.88 |=================================================================== PostgreSQL 17 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better a . 911 |==================================================================== b . 931 |====================================================================== PostgreSQL 17 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better a . 549.07 |=================================================================== b . 537.08 |================================================================== PostgreSQL 17 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 800 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better a . 647 |=================================================================== b . 677 |====================================================================== PostgreSQL 17 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 800 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better a . 1236.92 |================================================================== b . 1182.03 |=============================================================== PostgreSQL 17 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 1000 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better a . 424 |=============================================== b . 626 |====================================================================== PostgreSQL 17 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 1000 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better a . 2359.93 |================================================================== b . 1596.95 |============================================= PostgreSQL 17 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better a . 1594418 |================================================================= b . 1623585 |================================================================== PostgreSQL 17 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better a . 0.157 |==================================================================== b . 0.154 |=================================================================== PostgreSQL 17 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better a . 1346145 |================================================================= b . 1364721 |================================================================== PostgreSQL 17 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better a . 0.371 |==================================================================== b . 0.366 |=================================================================== PostgreSQL 17 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 800 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better a . 1022146 |================================================================= b . 1040745 |================================================================== PostgreSQL 17 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 800 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better a . 0.783 |==================================================================== b . 0.769 |=================================================================== PostgreSQL 17 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 1000 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better a . 838201 |=================================================================== b . 843852 |=================================================================== PostgreSQL 17 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 1000 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better a . 1.193 |==================================================================== b . 1.185 |==================================================================== PostgreSQL 17 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better a . 77310 |==================================================================== b . 76373 |=================================================================== PostgreSQL 17 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better a . 3.234 |=================================================================== b . 3.273 |==================================================================== PostgreSQL 17 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better a . 68607 |==================================================================== b . 64690 |================================================================ PostgreSQL 17 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better a . 7.288 |================================================================ b . 7.729 |==================================================================== PostgreSQL 17 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 800 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better a . 56201 |================================================================ b . 59601 |==================================================================== PostgreSQL 17 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 800 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better a . 14.24 |==================================================================== b . 13.42 |================================================================ PostgreSQL 17 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better a . 1118512 |================================================================== b . 1115543 |================================================================== PostgreSQL 17 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better a . 0.224 |==================================================================== b . 0.224 |==================================================================== PostgreSQL 17 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better a . 818311 |=================================================================== b . 817846 |=================================================================== PostgreSQL 17 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better a . 0.611 |==================================================================== b . 0.611 |==================================================================== PostgreSQL 17 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 800 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better a . 604149 |=================================================================== b . 560658 |============================================================== PostgreSQL 17 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 800 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better a . 1.324 |=============================================================== b . 1.427 |==================================================================== PostgreSQL 17 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 1000 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better a . 54178 |==================================================================== b . 54179 |==================================================================== PostgreSQL 17 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 1000 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better a . 18.46 |==================================================================== b . 18.46 |==================================================================== PostgreSQL 17 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 1000 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better a . 499559 |=================================================================== b . 497806 |=================================================================== PostgreSQL 17 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 1000 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better a . 2.002 |==================================================================== b . 2.009 |==================================================================== PostgreSQL 17 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better a . 61000 |==================================================================== b . 58179 |================================================================= PostgreSQL 17 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better a . 4.098 |================================================================= b . 4.297 |==================================================================== PostgreSQL 17 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better a . 36050 |================================================================ b . 38252 |==================================================================== PostgreSQL 17 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better a . 13.87 |==================================================================== b . 13.07 |================================================================ PostgreSQL 17 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 800 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better a . 31620 |================================================================ b . 33419 |==================================================================== PostgreSQL 17 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 800 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better a . 25.30 |==================================================================== b . 23.94 |================================================================ PostgreSQL 17 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 1000 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better a . 31567 |=============================================================== b . 34310 |==================================================================== PostgreSQL 17 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 1000 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better a . 31.68 |==================================================================== b . 29.15 |=============================================================== Apache Cassandra 5.0 Test: Writes Op/s > Higher Is Better a . 301148 |=================================================================== b . 297560 |==================================================================