Xeon 6980P Single Socket Server
Intel Xeon 6980P testing with a Intel BIRCHSTREAM (BHSDCRB1.IPC.0035.D44.2408292336 BIOS) and ASPEED on Ubuntu 24.04 via the Phoronix Test Suite.


a: 

	Processor: Intel Xeon 6980P @ 3.90GHz (128 Cores / 256 Threads), Motherboard: Intel BIRCHSTREAM (BHSDCRB1.IPC.0035.D44.2408292336 BIOS), Chipset: Intel Ice Lake IEH, Memory: 768GB, Disk: 2 x 3201GB KIOXIA KCMYXVUG3T20 + 960GB SAMSUNG MZ1L2960HCJR-00A07, Graphics: ASPEED, Network: Intel I210 + 2 x Intel 10-Gigabit X540-AT2

	OS: Ubuntu 24.04, Kernel: 6.8.0-22-generic (x86_64), Compiler: GCC 13.2.0, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 1920x1200

b: 

	Processor: Intel Xeon 6980P @ 3.90GHz (128 Cores / 256 Threads), Motherboard: Intel BIRCHSTREAM (BHSDCRB1.IPC.0035.D44.2408292336 BIOS), Chipset: Intel Ice Lake IEH, Memory: 768GB, Disk: 2 x 3201GB KIOXIA KCMYXVUG3T20 + 960GB SAMSUNG MZ1L2960HCJR-00A07, Graphics: ASPEED, Network: Intel I210 + 2 x Intel 10-Gigabit X540-AT2

	OS: Ubuntu 24.04, Kernel: 6.8.0-22-generic (x86_64), Compiler: GCC 13.2.0, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 1920x1200


Apache CouchDB 3.4.1
Bulk Size: 100 - Inserts: 3000 - Rounds: 30
Seconds < Lower Is Better
a . 351.79 |==================================================================
b . 355.97 |===================================================================


Apache CouchDB 3.4.1
Bulk Size: 300 - Inserts: 1000 - Rounds: 30
Seconds < Lower Is Better
a . 302.67 |===================================================================
b . 183.97 |=========================================


PostgreSQL 17
Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 1000 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency
ms < Lower Is Better
a . 1.622 |====================================================================
b . 1.617 |====================================================================


PostgreSQL 17
Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 1000 - Mode: Read Only
TPS > Higher Is Better
a . 616591 |===================================================================
b . 618288 |===================================================================


PostgreSQL 17
Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 800 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency
ms < Lower Is Better
a . 31.71 |===================================================================
b . 32.01 |====================================================================


PostgreSQL 17
Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 800 - Mode: Read Write
TPS > Higher Is Better
a . 25228 |====================================================================
b . 24992 |===================================================================


PostgreSQL 17
Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 1000 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency
ms < Lower Is Better
a . 42.10 |====================================================================
b . 40.16 |=================================================================


PostgreSQL 17
Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 1000 - Mode: Read Write
TPS > Higher Is Better
a . 23750 |=================================================================
b . 24903 |====================================================================


PostgreSQL 17
Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 800 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency
ms < Lower Is Better
a . 1.141 |=================================================================
b . 1.201 |====================================================================


PostgreSQL 17
Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 800 - Mode: Read Only
TPS > Higher Is Better
a . 701412 |===================================================================
b . 665964 |================================================================


PostgreSQL 17
Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 800 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency
ms < Lower Is Better
a . 0.877 |==================================================================
b . 0.901 |====================================================================


PostgreSQL 17
Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 800 - Mode: Read Only
TPS > Higher Is Better
a . 911681 |===================================================================
b . 888270 |=================================================================


PostgreSQL 17
Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 1000 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency
ms < Lower Is Better
a . 0.947 |=======================================================
b . 1.171 |====================================================================


PostgreSQL 17
Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 1000 - Mode: Read Only
TPS > Higher Is Better
a . 1056113 |==================================================================
b . 854238  |=====================================================


PostgreSQL 17
Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 1000 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency
ms < Lower Is Better
a . 40.28 |====================================================================
b . 37.84 |================================================================


PostgreSQL 17
Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 1000 - Mode: Read Write
TPS > Higher Is Better
a . 24826 |================================================================
b . 26425 |====================================================================


PostgreSQL 17
Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 800 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency
ms < Lower Is Better
a . 28.58 |=============================================================
b . 31.71 |====================================================================


PostgreSQL 17
Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 800 - Mode: Read Write
TPS > Higher Is Better
a . 27991 |====================================================================
b . 25227 |=============================================================


Apache Cassandra 5.0
Test: Writes
Op/s > Higher Is Better
a . 138707 |===================================================================
b . 126212 |=============================================================


Apache CouchDB 3.4.1
Bulk Size: 100 - Inserts: 1000 - Rounds: 30
Seconds < Lower Is Better
a . 109.71 |===================================================================
b . 109.54 |===================================================================


Stockfish 17
Chess Benchmark
Nodes Per Second > Higher Is Better
a . 289642146 |========================================================
b . 330973062 |================================================================


NAMD 3.0
Input: STMV with 1,066,628 Atoms
ns/day > Higher Is Better
a . 4.02194 |==================================================================
b . 3.93478 |=================================================================


NAMD 3.0
Input: ATPase with 327,506 Atoms
ns/day > Higher Is Better
a . 9.81672 |==================================================================
b . 9.15382 |==============================================================


Y-Cruncher 0.8.5
Pi Digits To Calculate: 5B
Seconds < Lower Is Better
a . 20.80 |=================================================================
b . 21.79 |====================================================================


GROMACS 2024
Implementation: MPI CPU - Input: water_GMX50_bare
Ns Per Day > Higher Is Better
a . 17.16 |=======================================================
b . 21.32 |====================================================================


Etcpak 2.0
Benchmark: Multi-Threaded - Configuration: ETC2
Mpx/s > Higher Is Better
a . 1048.33 |=================================================================
b . 1065.20 |==================================================================


Y-Cruncher 0.8.5
Pi Digits To Calculate: 1B
Seconds < Lower Is Better
a . 4.058 |====================================================================
b . 4.071 |====================================================================


Y-Cruncher 0.8.5
Pi Digits To Calculate: 500M
Seconds < Lower Is Better
a . 2.165 |====================================================================
b . 1.852 |==========================================================