bbbbbb AMD Ryzen 7 3700X 8-Core testing with a ASUS TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) (5003 BIOS) and Gigabyte NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 6GB on RockyLinux 9.4 via the Phoronix Test Suite. Gigabyte NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060: Processor: AMD Ryzen 7 3700X 8-Core @ 3.60GHz (8 Cores / 16 Threads), Motherboard: ASUS TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) (5003 BIOS), Chipset: AMD Starship/Matisse, Memory: 32GB, Disk: 1000GB Samsung SSD 970 EVO 1TB + 960GB ADATA SU650 + 4001GB Seagate ST4000DM000-1F21 + 240GB INTEL SSDSC2BW24 + 16GB USB DISK 3.0, Graphics: Gigabyte NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 6GB, Audio: NVIDIA GP106 HD Audio, Network: Realtek RTL8111/8168/8211/8411 + Intel Wi-Fi 5 OS: RockyLinux 9.4, Kernel: 6.1.102-1.el9.elrepo.x86_64 (x86_64), Desktop: KDE Plasma 5.27.11, Display Server: X Server 1.20.11, Display Driver: NVIDIA 560.28.03, OpenGL: 4.6.0, OpenCL: OpenCL 3.0 CUDA 12.6.32, Compiler: GCC 11.4.1 20231218, File-System: xfs, Screen Resolution: 1440x880 Betsy GPU Compressor 1.1 Beta Codec: ETC1 - Quality: Highest Seconds < Lower Is Better Betsy GPU Compressor 1.1 Beta Codec: ETC2 RGB - Quality: Highest Seconds < Lower Is Better PlaidML FP16: No - Mode: Training - Network: Mobilenet - Device: OpenCL Examples Per Second > Higher Is Better PlaidML FP16: No - Mode: Inference - Network: IMDB LSTM - Device: OpenCL Examples Per Second > Higher Is Better PlaidML FP16: No - Mode: Inference - Network: Mobilenet - Device: OpenCL Examples Per Second > Higher Is Better PlaidML FP16: Yes - Mode: Inference - Network: Mobilenet - Device: OpenCL Examples Per Second > Higher Is Better PlaidML FP16: No - Mode: Inference - Network: DenseNet 201 - Device: OpenCL Examples Per Second > Higher Is Better LeelaChessZero 0.30 Backend: OpenCL Nodes Per Second > Higher Is Better Caffe 2020-02-13 Model: AlexNet - Acceleration: NVIDIA CUDA - Iterations: 100 Milli-Seconds < Lower Is Better Caffe 2020-02-13 Model: AlexNet - Acceleration: NVIDIA CUDA - Iterations: 200 Milli-Seconds < Lower Is Better Caffe 2020-02-13 Model: AlexNet - Acceleration: NVIDIA CUDA - Iterations: 1000 Milli-Seconds < Lower Is Better Caffe 2020-02-13 Model: GoogleNet - Acceleration: NVIDIA CUDA - Iterations: 100 Milli-Seconds < Lower Is Better Caffe 2020-02-13 Model: GoogleNet - Acceleration: NVIDIA CUDA - Iterations: 200 Milli-Seconds < Lower Is Better Caffe 2020-02-13 Model: GoogleNet - Acceleration: NVIDIA CUDA - Iterations: 1000 Milli-Seconds < Lower Is Better SHOC Scalable HeterOgeneous Computing 2020-04-17 Target: OpenCL - Benchmark: S3D SHOC Scalable HeterOgeneous Computing 2020-04-17 Target: OpenCL - Benchmark: Triad SHOC Scalable HeterOgeneous Computing 2020-04-17 Target: OpenCL - Benchmark: FFT SP SHOC Scalable HeterOgeneous Computing 2020-04-17 Target: OpenCL - Benchmark: MD5 Hash SHOC Scalable HeterOgeneous Computing 2020-04-17 Target: OpenCL - Benchmark: Reduction SHOC Scalable HeterOgeneous Computing 2020-04-17 Target: OpenCL - Benchmark: GEMM SGEMM_N SHOC Scalable HeterOgeneous Computing 2020-04-17 Target: OpenCL - Benchmark: Max SP Flops SHOC Scalable HeterOgeneous Computing 2020-04-17 Target: OpenCL - Benchmark: Bus Speed Download SHOC Scalable HeterOgeneous Computing 2020-04-17 Target: OpenCL - Benchmark: Bus Speed Readback SHOC Scalable HeterOgeneous Computing 2020-04-17 Target: OpenCL - Benchmark: Texture Read Bandwidth NCNN 20230517 Target: Vulkan GPU - Model: mobilenet ms < Lower Is Better Gigabyte NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 . 23.66 |===================================== NCNN 20230517 Target: Vulkan GPU-v2-v2 - Model: mobilenet-v2 ms < Lower Is Better Gigabyte NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 . 7.36 |====================================== NCNN 20230517 Target: Vulkan GPU-v3-v3 - Model: mobilenet-v3 ms < Lower Is Better Gigabyte NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 . 6.10 |====================================== NCNN 20230517 Target: Vulkan GPU - Model: shufflenet-v2 ms < Lower Is Better Gigabyte NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 . 6.67 |====================================== NCNN 20230517 Target: Vulkan GPU - Model: mnasnet ms < Lower Is Better Gigabyte NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 . 6.12 |====================================== NCNN 20230517 Target: Vulkan GPU - Model: efficientnet-b0 ms < Lower Is Better Gigabyte NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 . 11.64 |===================================== NCNN 20230517 Target: Vulkan GPU - Model: blazeface ms < Lower Is Better Gigabyte NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 . 1.99 |====================================== NCNN 20230517 Target: Vulkan GPU - Model: googlenet ms < Lower Is Better Gigabyte NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 . 19.84 |===================================== NCNN 20230517 Target: Vulkan GPU - Model: vgg16 ms < Lower Is Better Gigabyte NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 . 67.71 |===================================== NCNN 20230517 Target: Vulkan GPU - Model: resnet18 ms < Lower Is Better Gigabyte NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 . 13.30 |===================================== NCNN 20230517 Target: Vulkan GPU - Model: alexnet ms < Lower Is Better Gigabyte NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 . 12.53 |===================================== NCNN 20230517 Target: Vulkan GPU - Model: resnet50 ms < Lower Is Better Gigabyte NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 . 30.26 |===================================== NCNN 20230517 Target: Vulkan GPU - Model: yolov4-tiny ms < Lower Is Better Gigabyte NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 . 35.24 |===================================== NCNN 20230517 Target: Vulkan GPU - Model: squeezenet_ssd ms < Lower Is Better Gigabyte NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 . 17.00 |===================================== NCNN 20230517 Target: Vulkan GPU - Model: regnety_400m ms < Lower Is Better Gigabyte NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 . 16.14 |===================================== NCNN 20230517 Target: Vulkan GPU - Model: vision_transformer ms < Lower Is Better Gigabyte NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 . 145.30 |==================================== NCNN 20230517 Target: Vulkan GPU - Model: FastestDet ms < Lower Is Better Gigabyte NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 . 6.97 |====================================== GROMACS 2024 Implementation: NVIDIA CUDA GPU - Input: water_GMX50_bare Ns Per Day > Higher Is Better Rodinia 3.1 Test: OpenCL Particle Filter Seconds < Lower Is Better ArrayFire 3.9 Test: Conjugate Gradient OpenCL Blender 4.2 Blend File: BMW27 - Compute: NVIDIA OptiX Seconds < Lower Is Better Gigabyte NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 . 89.63 |===================================== Blender 4.2 Blend File: Junkshop - Compute: NVIDIA OptiX Seconds < Lower Is Better Gigabyte NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 . 128.87 |==================================== Blender 4.2 Blend File: Classroom - Compute: NVIDIA OptiX Seconds < Lower Is Better Gigabyte NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 . 184.75 |==================================== Blender 4.2 Blend File: Fishy Cat - Compute: NVIDIA OptiX Seconds < Lower Is Better Gigabyte NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 . 176.99 |==================================== Blender 4.2 Blend File: Barbershop - Compute: NVIDIA OptiX Seconds < Lower Is Better Gigabyte NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 . 745.28 |==================================== Blender 4.2 Blend File: Pabellon Barcelona - Compute: NVIDIA OptiX Seconds < Lower Is Better Gigabyte NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 . 450.97 |==================================== NeatBench 5 Acceleration: GPU FPS > Higher Is Better Gigabyte NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 . 1060 |====================================== IndigoBench 4.4 Acceleration: OpenCL GPU - Scene: Bedroom M samples/s > Higher Is Better Gigabyte NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 . 3.445 |===================================== IndigoBench 4.4 Acceleration: OpenCL GPU - Scene: Supercar M samples/s > Higher Is Better Gigabyte NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 . 9.827 |===================================== LuxCoreRender 2.6 Scene: DLSC - Acceleration: GPU M samples/sec > Higher Is Better Gigabyte NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 . 1.14 |====================================== LuxCoreRender 2.6 Scene: Danish Mood - Acceleration: GPU M samples/sec > Higher Is Better Gigabyte NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 . 0.73 |====================================== LuxCoreRender 2.6 Scene: Orange Juice - Acceleration: GPU M samples/sec > Higher Is Better Gigabyte NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 . 1.41 |====================================== LuxCoreRender 2.6 Scene: LuxCore Benchmark - Acceleration: GPU M samples/sec > Higher Is Better Gigabyte NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 . 0.89 |====================================== LuxCoreRender 2.6 Scene: Rainbow Colors and Prism - Acceleration: GPU M samples/sec > Higher Is Better Gigabyte NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 . 5.96 |====================================== FAHBench 2.3.2 Ns Per Day > Higher Is Better Gigabyte NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 . 108.49 |==================================== Hashcat 6.2.4 Benchmark: MD5 H/s > Higher Is Better Gigabyte NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 . 12914566667 |=============================== Hashcat 6.2.4 Benchmark: SHA1 H/s > Higher Is Better Gigabyte NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 . 4539333333 |================================ Hashcat 6.2.4 Benchmark: 7-Zip H/s > Higher Is Better Gigabyte NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 . 188967 |==================================== Hashcat 6.2.4 Benchmark: SHA-512 H/s > Higher Is Better Gigabyte NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 . 480733333 |================================= Hashcat 6.2.4 Benchmark: TrueCrypt RIPEMD160 + XTS H/s > Higher Is Better Gigabyte NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 . 135633 |==================================== Mixbench 2020-06-23 Backend: OpenCL - Benchmark: Integer Mixbench 2020-06-23 Backend: NVIDIA CUDA - Benchmark: Integer Mixbench 2020-06-23 Backend: OpenCL - Benchmark: Double Precision Mixbench 2020-06-23 Backend: OpenCL - Benchmark: Single Precision Mixbench 2020-06-23 Backend: NVIDIA CUDA - Benchmark: Half Precision Mixbench 2020-06-23 Backend: NVIDIA CUDA - Benchmark: Double Precision Mixbench 2020-06-23 Backend: NVIDIA CUDA - Benchmark: Single Precision NAMD CUDA 2.14 ATPase Simulation - 327,506 Atoms days/ns < Lower Is Better Gigabyte NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 . 0.39580 |=================================== OctaneBench 2020.1 Total Score Score > Higher Is Better Gigabyte NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 . 82.39 |===================================== FinanceBench 2016-07-25 Benchmark: Black-Scholes OpenCL ms < Lower Is Better cl-mem 2017-01-13 Benchmark: Copy cl-mem 2017-01-13 Benchmark: Read cl-mem 2017-01-13 Benchmark: Write clpeak 1.1.2 OpenCL Test: Integer Compute INT GIOPS > Higher Is Better Gigabyte NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 . 1569.94 |=================================== clpeak 1.1.2 OpenCL Test: Single-Precision Float GFLOPS > Higher Is Better Gigabyte NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 . 4561.78 |=================================== clpeak 1.1.2 OpenCL Test: Double-Precision Double GFLOPS > Higher Is Better Gigabyte NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 . 152.87 |==================================== clpeak 1.1.2 OpenCL Test: Global Memory Bandwidth GBPS > Higher Is Better Gigabyte NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 . 145.38 |==================================== MandelGPU 1.3pts1 OpenCL Device: GPU Samples/sec > Higher Is Better ViennaCL 1.7.1 Test: CPU BLAS - sCOPY GB/s > Higher Is Better Gigabyte NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 . 18.2 |====================================== ViennaCL 1.7.1 Test: CPU BLAS - sAXPY GB/s > Higher Is Better Gigabyte NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 . 27.0 |====================================== ViennaCL 1.7.1 Test: CPU BLAS - sDOT GB/s > Higher Is Better Gigabyte NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 . 25.5 |====================================== ViennaCL 1.7.1 Test: CPU BLAS - dCOPY GB/s > Higher Is Better Gigabyte NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 . 18.9 |====================================== ViennaCL 1.7.1 Test: CPU BLAS - dAXPY GB/s > Higher Is Better Gigabyte NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 . 29.0 |====================================== ViennaCL 1.7.1 Test: CPU BLAS - dDOT GB/s > Higher Is Better Gigabyte NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 . 26.9 |====================================== ViennaCL 1.7.1 Test: CPU BLAS - dGEMV-N GB/s > Higher Is Better Gigabyte NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 . 28.8 |====================================== ViennaCL 1.7.1 Test: CPU BLAS - dGEMV-T GB/s > Higher Is Better Gigabyte NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 . 28.6 |====================================== ViennaCL 1.7.1 Test: CPU BLAS - dGEMM-NN GFLOPs/s > Higher Is Better Gigabyte NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 . 38.8 |====================================== ViennaCL 1.7.1 Test: CPU BLAS - dGEMM-NT GFLOPs/s > Higher Is Better Gigabyte NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 . 37.0 |====================================== ViennaCL 1.7.1 Test: CPU BLAS - dGEMM-TN GFLOPs/s > Higher Is Better Gigabyte NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 . 42.0 |====================================== ViennaCL 1.7.1 Test: CPU BLAS - dGEMM-TT GFLOPs/s > Higher Is Better Gigabyte NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 . 39.7 |====================================== ViennaCL 1.7.1 Test: OpenCL BLAS GFLOPS > Higher Is Better Libplacebo 6.338.2 FPS > Higher Is Better RealSR-NCNN 20200818 Scale: 4x - TAA: No Seconds < Lower Is Better Gigabyte NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 . 21.28 |===================================== RealSR-NCNN 20200818 Scale: 4x - TAA: Yes Seconds < Lower Is Better Gigabyte NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 . 142.85 |==================================== VkFFT 1.3.4 Test: FFT + iFFT R2C / C2R Benchmark Score > Higher Is Better Gigabyte NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 . 14157 |===================================== VkFFT 1.3.4 Test: FFT + iFFT C2C 1D batched in half precision Benchmark Score > Higher Is Better Gigabyte NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 . 40331 |===================================== VkFFT 1.3.4 Test: FFT + iFFT C2C Bluestein in single precision Benchmark Score > Higher Is Better Gigabyte NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 . 4430 |====================================== VkFFT 1.3.4 Test: FFT + iFFT C2C 1D batched in double precision Benchmark Score > Higher Is Better Gigabyte NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 . 7166 |====================================== VkFFT 1.3.4 Test: FFT + iFFT C2C 1D batched in single precision Benchmark Score > Higher Is Better Gigabyte NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 . 24645 |===================================== VkFFT 1.3.4 Test: FFT + iFFT C2C multidimensional in single precision Benchmark Score > Higher Is Better Gigabyte NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 . 14111 |===================================== VkFFT 1.3.4 Test: FFT + iFFT C2C Bluestein benchmark in double precision Benchmark Score > Higher Is Better Gigabyte NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 . 1469 |====================================== VkFFT 1.3.4 Test: FFT + iFFT C2C 1D batched in single precision, no reshuffling Benchmark Score > Higher Is Better Gigabyte NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 . 25624 |===================================== vkpeak 20230730 fp32-scalar GFLOPS > Higher Is Better Gigabyte NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 . 4810.60 |=================================== vkpeak 20230730 fp32-vec4 GFLOPS > Higher Is Better Gigabyte NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 . 4640.91 |=================================== vkpeak 20230730 fp64-scalar GFLOPS > Higher Is Better Gigabyte NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 . 154.49 |==================================== vkpeak 20230730 fp64-vec4 GFLOPS > Higher Is Better Gigabyte NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 . 154.51 |==================================== vkpeak 20230730 int32-scalar GIOPS > Higher Is Better Gigabyte NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 . 1620.74 |=================================== vkpeak 20230730 int32-vec4 GIOPS > Higher Is Better Gigabyte NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 . 1496.67 |=================================== VkResample 1.0 Upscale: 2x - Precision: Double ms < Lower Is Better Gigabyte NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 . 500.00 |==================================== VkResample 1.0 Upscale: 2x - Precision: Single ms < Lower Is Better Gigabyte NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 . 60.61 |===================================== Waifu2x-NCNN Vulkan 20200818 Scale: 2x - Denoise: 3 - TAA: No Seconds < Lower Is Better Gigabyte NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 . 2.390 |===================================== Waifu2x-NCNN Vulkan 20200818 Scale: 2x - Denoise: 3 - TAA: Yes Seconds < Lower Is Better Gigabyte NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 . 9.477 |=====================================