serverJet-benchmark m6id.4xlarge m6id.4xlarge: Processor: Intel Xeon Platinum 8375C (8 Cores / 16 Threads), Motherboard: Amazon EC2 m6id.4xlarge (1.0 BIOS), Chipset: Intel 440FX 82441FX PMC, Memory: 62GB, Disk: 1104GB Amazon Elastic Block Store + 950GB Amazon EC2 NVMe Instance Storage, Graphics: simpledrmdrmfb, Network: Amazon Elastic OS: Ubuntu 24.04, Kernel: 6.8.0-1009-aws (x86_64), Compiler: GCC 13.2.0, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 800x600, System Layer: amazon SQLite 3.30.1 Threads / Copies: 1 Seconds < Lower Is Better m6id.4xlarge . 32.11 |========================================================= SQLite 3.30.1 Threads / Copies: 8 Seconds < Lower Is Better m6id.4xlarge . 90.11 |========================================================= SQLite 3.30.1 Threads / Copies: 32 Seconds < Lower Is Better m6id.4xlarge . 329.73 |======================================================== SQLite 3.30.1 Threads / Copies: 64 Seconds < Lower Is Better m6id.4xlarge . 651.20 |======================================================== SQLite 3.30.1 Threads / Copies: 128 Seconds < Lower Is Better m6id.4xlarge . 1299.38 |======================================================= simdjson 2.0 Throughput Test: Kostya GB/s > Higher Is Better m6id.4xlarge . 2.78 |========================================================== simdjson 2.0 Throughput Test: TopTweet GB/s > Higher Is Better m6id.4xlarge . 5.86 |========================================================== simdjson 2.0 Throughput Test: LargeRandom GB/s > Higher Is Better m6id.4xlarge . 0.95 |========================================================== simdjson 2.0 Throughput Test: PartialTweets GB/s > Higher Is Better m6id.4xlarge . 5.11 |========================================================== simdjson 2.0 Throughput Test: DistinctUserID GB/s > Higher Is Better m6id.4xlarge . 5.89 |========================================================== Node.js Express HTTP Load Test Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better ebizzy 0.3 Records/s > Higher Is Better m6id.4xlarge . 414132 |======================================================== Timed Apache Compilation 2.4.41 Time To Compile Seconds < Lower Is Better m6id.4xlarge . 27.32 |========================================================= Timed FFmpeg Compilation 7.0 Seconds < Lower Is Better Timed GCC Compilation 13.2 Seconds < Lower Is Better Timed GDB GNU Debugger Compilation 10.2 Time To Compile Seconds < Lower Is Better m6id.4xlarge . 79.26 |========================================================= Timed Gem5 Compilation 23.0.1 Time To Compile Seconds < Lower Is Better m6id.4xlarge . 685.49 |======================================================== Timed Godot Game Engine Compilation 4.0 Time To Compile Seconds < Lower Is Better m6id.4xlarge . 527.47 |======================================================== Timed ImageMagick Compilation 6.9.0 Time To Compile Seconds < Lower Is Better m6id.4xlarge . 34.34 |========================================================= Timed Linux Kernel Compilation 6.8 Build: defconfig Seconds < Lower Is Better Timed Linux Kernel Compilation 6.8 Build: allmodconfig Seconds < Lower Is Better Timed LLVM Compilation 16.0 Build System: Ninja Seconds < Lower Is Better m6id.4xlarge . 1012.35 |======================================================= Timed LLVM Compilation 16.0 Build System: Unix Makefiles Seconds < Lower Is Better m6id.4xlarge . 1046.87 |======================================================= Timed Mesa Compilation 24.0 Seconds < Lower Is Better Timed MPlayer Compilation 1.5 Seconds < Lower Is Better Timed Node.js Compilation 21.7.2 Time To Compile Seconds < Lower Is Better m6id.4xlarge . 1248.36 |======================================================= Timed PHP Compilation 8.3.4 Seconds < Lower Is Better Timed CPython Compilation 3.10.6 Build Configuration: Default Seconds < Lower Is Better m6id.4xlarge . 29.13 |========================================================= Timed CPython Compilation 3.10.6 Build Configuration: Released Build, PGO + LTO Optimized Seconds < Lower Is Better m6id.4xlarge . 348.03 |======================================================== Build2 0.15 Seconds < Lower Is Better Timed Eigen Compilation 3.3.9 Time To Compile Seconds < Lower Is Better m6id.4xlarge . 98.74 |========================================================= Timed Erlang/OTP Compilation 25.0 Time To Compile Seconds < Lower Is Better m6id.4xlarge . 110.35 |======================================================== Timed Wasmer Compilation 2.3 Time To Compile Seconds < Lower Is Better m6id.4xlarge . 58.14 |========================================================= Perl Benchmarks Test: Pod2html Seconds < Lower Is Better m6id.4xlarge . 0.11180831 |==================================================== Perl Benchmarks Test: Interpreter Seconds < Lower Is Better m6id.4xlarge . 0.00112840 |==================================================== OpenSSL 3.3 Algorithm: SHA256 byte/s > Higher Is Better m6id.4xlarge . 6822586403 |==================================================== OpenSSL 3.3 Algorithm: SHA512 byte/s > Higher Is Better m6id.4xlarge . 2719157823 |==================================================== OpenSSL 3.3 Algorithm: RSA4096 sign/s > Higher Is Better m6id.4xlarge . 5096.9 |======================================================== OpenSSL 3.3 Algorithm: RSA4096 verify/s > Higher Is Better m6id.4xlarge . 138483.9 |====================================================== OpenSSL 3.3 Algorithm: ChaCha20 byte/s > Higher Is Better m6id.4xlarge . 50483513297 |=================================================== OpenSSL 3.3 Algorithm: AES-128-GCM byte/s > Higher Is Better m6id.4xlarge . 104170235493 |================================================== OpenSSL 3.3 Algorithm: AES-256-GCM byte/s > Higher Is Better m6id.4xlarge . 92103265850 |=================================================== OpenSSL 3.3 Algorithm: ChaCha20-Poly1305 byte/s > Higher Is Better m6id.4xlarge . 36306974220 |=================================================== Node.js V8 Web Tooling Benchmark runs/s > Higher Is Better m6id.4xlarge . 11.87 |========================================================= ClickHouse 22.12.3.5 100M Rows Hits Dataset, First Run / Cold Cache Queries Per Minute, Geo Mean > Higher Is Better m6id.4xlarge . 153.12 |======================================================== ClickHouse 22.12.3.5 100M Rows Hits Dataset, Second Run Queries Per Minute, Geo Mean > Higher Is Better m6id.4xlarge . 186.21 |======================================================== ClickHouse 22.12.3.5 100M Rows Hits Dataset, Third Run Queries Per Minute, Geo Mean > Higher Is Better m6id.4xlarge . 190.96 |======================================================== Memcached 1.6.19 Set To Get Ratio: 1:1 Ops/sec > Higher Is Better m6id.4xlarge . 1738489.59 |==================================================== Memcached 1.6.19 Set To Get Ratio: 1:5 Ops/sec > Higher Is Better m6id.4xlarge . 1860688.86 |==================================================== Memcached 1.6.19 Set To Get Ratio: 5:1 Ops/sec > Higher Is Better m6id.4xlarge . 1243637.50 |==================================================== Memcached 1.6.19 Set To Get Ratio: 1:10 Ops/sec > Higher Is Better m6id.4xlarge . 1834977.94 |==================================================== Memcached 1.6.19 Set To Get Ratio: 1:100 Ops/sec > Higher Is Better m6id.4xlarge . 1838253.05 |==================================================== Redis 7.0.4 Test: GET - Parallel Connections: 50 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better m6id.4xlarge . 2716568.42 |==================================================== Redis 7.0.4 Test: SET - Parallel Connections: 50 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better m6id.4xlarge . 2041518.00 |==================================================== Redis 7.0.4 Test: GET - Parallel Connections: 500 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better m6id.4xlarge . 2595706.33 |==================================================== Redis 7.0.4 Test: LPOP - Parallel Connections: 50 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better m6id.4xlarge . 3046676.92 |==================================================== Redis 7.0.4 Test: SADD - Parallel Connections: 50 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better m6id.4xlarge . 2329769.83 |==================================================== Redis 7.0.4 Test: SET - Parallel Connections: 500 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better m6id.4xlarge . 2025231.71 |==================================================== Redis 7.0.4 Test: GET - Parallel Connections: 1000 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better m6id.4xlarge . 2524225.46 |==================================================== Redis 7.0.4 Test: LPOP - Parallel Connections: 500 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better m6id.4xlarge . 2988175.33 |==================================================== Redis 7.0.4 Test: LPUSH - Parallel Connections: 50 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better m6id.4xlarge . 1629456.79 |==================================================== Redis 7.0.4 Test: SADD - Parallel Connections: 500 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better m6id.4xlarge . 2362840.17 |==================================================== Redis 7.0.4 Test: SET - Parallel Connections: 1000 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better m6id.4xlarge . 2045101.21 |==================================================== Redis 7.0.4 Test: LPOP - Parallel Connections: 1000 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better m6id.4xlarge . 1831616.38 |==================================================== Redis 7.0.4 Test: LPUSH - Parallel Connections: 500 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better m6id.4xlarge . 1725892.26 |==================================================== Redis 7.0.4 Test: SADD - Parallel Connections: 1000 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better m6id.4xlarge . 2315327.75 |==================================================== Redis 7.0.4 Test: LPUSH - Parallel Connections: 1000 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better m6id.4xlarge . 1734319.62 |==================================================== MariaDB mariadb-slap 11.5 Clients: 1 Queries Per Second > Higher Is Better m6id.4xlarge . 1309 |========================================================== MariaDB mariadb-slap 11.5 Clients: 32 Queries Per Second > Higher Is Better m6id.4xlarge . 555 |=========================================================== MariaDB mariadb-slap 11.5 Clients: 64 Queries Per Second > Higher Is Better m6id.4xlarge . 367 |=========================================================== MariaDB mariadb-slap 11.5 Clients: 128 Queries Per Second > Higher Is Better m6id.4xlarge . 219 |=========================================================== MariaDB mariadb-slap 11.5 Clients: 256 Queries Per Second > Higher Is Better m6id.4xlarge . 121 |=========================================================== MariaDB mariadb-slap 11.5 Clients: 512 Queries Per Second > Higher Is Better m6id.4xlarge . 52 |============================================================ MariaDB mariadb-slap 11.5 Clients: 1024 Queries Per Second > Higher Is Better m6id.4xlarge . 6 |============================================================= MariaDB mariadb-slap 11.5 Clients: 2048 Queries Per Second > Higher Is Better m6id.4xlarge . 3 |============================================================= MariaDB mariadb-slap 11.5 Clients: 4096 Queries Per Second > Higher Is Better m6id.4xlarge . 1 |============================================================= MariaDB mariadb-slap 11.5 Clients: 8192 Queries Per Second > Higher Is Better m6id.4xlarge . 5 |============================================================= PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better m6id.4xlarge . 37169 |========================================================= PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better m6id.4xlarge . 0.027 |========================================================= PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better m6id.4xlarge . 970 |=========================================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better m6id.4xlarge . 1.031 |========================================================= PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better m6id.4xlarge . 539688 |======================================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better m6id.4xlarge . 0.093 |========================================================= PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better m6id.4xlarge . 526228 |======================================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better m6id.4xlarge . 0.190 |========================================================= PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better m6id.4xlarge . 493560 |======================================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better m6id.4xlarge . 0.507 |========================================================= PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better m6id.4xlarge . 991 |=========================================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better m6id.4xlarge . 50.48 |========================================================= PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better m6id.4xlarge . 465524 |======================================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better m6id.4xlarge . 1.074 |========================================================= PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 800 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better m6id.4xlarge . 366521 |======================================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 800 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better m6id.4xlarge . 2.183 |========================================================= PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better m6id.4xlarge . 34754 |========================================================= PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better m6id.4xlarge . 0.029 |========================================================= PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better m6id.4xlarge . 952 |=========================================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better m6id.4xlarge . 105.03 |======================================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 1000 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better m6id.4xlarge . 324602 |======================================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 1000 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better m6id.4xlarge . 3.081 |========================================================= PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better m6id.4xlarge . 853 |=========================================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better m6id.4xlarge . 292.93 |======================================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better m6id.4xlarge . 752 |=========================================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better m6id.4xlarge . 665.38 |======================================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 5000 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 800 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better m6id.4xlarge . 563 |=========================================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 800 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better m6id.4xlarge . 1421.50 |======================================================= PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better m6id.4xlarge . 875 |=========================================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better m6id.4xlarge . 1.144 |========================================================= PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better m6id.4xlarge . 494118 |======================================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better m6id.4xlarge . 0.101 |========================================================= PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better m6id.4xlarge . 30255 |========================================================= PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better m6id.4xlarge . 0.033 |========================================================= PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 1000 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better m6id.4xlarge . 505 |=========================================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 1000 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better m6id.4xlarge . 1979.19 |======================================================= PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 5000 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better m6id.4xlarge . 477353 |======================================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better m6id.4xlarge . 0.209 |========================================================= PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better m6id.4xlarge . 449041 |======================================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better m6id.4xlarge . 0.557 |========================================================= PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better m6id.4xlarge . 4542 |========================================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better m6id.4xlarge . 11.01 |========================================================= PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better m6id.4xlarge . 403983 |======================================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better m6id.4xlarge . 1.238 |========================================================= PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 800 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better m6id.4xlarge . 306230 |======================================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 800 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better m6id.4xlarge . 2.613 |========================================================= PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better m6id.4xlarge . 709 |=========================================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better m6id.4xlarge . 1.410 |========================================================= PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better m6id.4xlarge . 366540 |======================================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better m6id.4xlarge . 0.137 |========================================================= PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better m6id.4xlarge . 1812 |========================================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better m6id.4xlarge . 0.552 |========================================================= PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 25000 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better m6id.4xlarge . 1109 |========================================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 25000 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better m6id.4xlarge . 0.902 |========================================================= PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better m6id.4xlarge . 4749 |========================================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better m6id.4xlarge . 21.06 |========================================================= PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 1000 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better m6id.4xlarge . 302449 |======================================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 1000 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better m6id.4xlarge . 3.307 |========================================================= PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better m6id.4xlarge . 4432 |========================================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better m6id.4xlarge . 56.43 |========================================================= PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better m6id.4xlarge . 4366 |========================================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better m6id.4xlarge . 114.53 |======================================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 5000 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 800 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better m6id.4xlarge . 4417 |========================================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 800 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better m6id.4xlarge . 181.14 |======================================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better m6id.4xlarge . 392467 |======================================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better m6id.4xlarge . 0.255 |========================================================= PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better m6id.4xlarge . 364155 |======================================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better m6id.4xlarge . 0.686 |========================================================= PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better m6id.4xlarge . 2195 |========================================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better m6id.4xlarge . 22.78 |========================================================= PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better m6id.4xlarge . 323420 |======================================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better m6id.4xlarge . 1.546 |========================================================= PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 800 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better m6id.4xlarge . 259586 |======================================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 800 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better m6id.4xlarge . 3.082 |========================================================= PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better m6id.4xlarge . 573 |=========================================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better m6id.4xlarge . 1.749 |========================================================= PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better m6id.4xlarge . 3286 |========================================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better m6id.4xlarge . 15.22 |========================================================= PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 25000 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better m6id.4xlarge . 474 |=========================================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 25000 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better m6id.4xlarge . 2.113 |========================================================= PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 25000 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better m6id.4xlarge . 1992 |========================================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 25000 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better m6id.4xlarge . 25.09 |========================================================= PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 1000 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better m6id.4xlarge . 4385 |========================================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 1000 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better m6id.4xlarge . 228.07 |======================================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 5000 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better m6id.4xlarge . 3467 |========================================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better m6id.4xlarge . 28.87 |========================================================= PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 1000 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better m6id.4xlarge . 234056 |======================================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 1000 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better m6id.4xlarge . 4.273 |========================================================= PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better m6id.4xlarge . 3995 |========================================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better m6id.4xlarge . 62.60 |========================================================= PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better m6id.4xlarge . 4705 |========================================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better m6id.4xlarge . 106.29 |======================================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 5000 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 800 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better m6id.4xlarge . 4227 |========================================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 800 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better m6id.4xlarge . 190.36 |======================================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better m6id.4xlarge . 3380 |========================================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better m6id.4xlarge . 29.59 |========================================================= PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better m6id.4xlarge . 3531 |========================================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better m6id.4xlarge . 70.80 |========================================================= PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better m6id.4xlarge . 1999 |========================================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better m6id.4xlarge . 25.01 |========================================================= PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better m6id.4xlarge . 3534 |========================================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better m6id.4xlarge . 141.50 |======================================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 800 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better m6id.4xlarge . 3538 |========================================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 800 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better m6id.4xlarge . 226.13 |======================================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 25000 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better m6id.4xlarge . 2004 |========================================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 25000 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better m6id.4xlarge . 49.90 |========================================================= PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 25000 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better m6id.4xlarge . 2175 |========================================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 25000 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better m6id.4xlarge . 114.94 |======================================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 25000 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better m6id.4xlarge . 1466 |========================================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 25000 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better m6id.4xlarge . 34.10 |========================================================= PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 25000 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better m6id.4xlarge . 2180 |========================================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 25000 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better m6id.4xlarge . 229.40 |======================================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 25000 - Clients: 800 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better m6id.4xlarge . 2179 |========================================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 25000 - Clients: 800 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better m6id.4xlarge . 367.20 |======================================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 1000 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better m6id.4xlarge . 4442 |========================================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 1000 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better m6id.4xlarge . 225.15 |======================================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 5000 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better m6id.4xlarge . 2309 |========================================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better m6id.4xlarge . 43.31 |========================================================= PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 1000 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better m6id.4xlarge . 3535 |========================================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 1000 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better m6id.4xlarge . 282.85 |======================================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better m6id.4xlarge . 2653 |========================================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better m6id.4xlarge . 94.24 |========================================================= PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better m6id.4xlarge . 2839 |========================================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better m6id.4xlarge . 176.11 |======================================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 5000 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 800 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better m6id.4xlarge . 2929 |========================================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 800 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better m6id.4xlarge . 273.16 |======================================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 25000 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better m6id.4xlarge . 1640 |========================================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 25000 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better m6id.4xlarge . 61.01 |========================================================= PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 25000 - Clients: 1000 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better m6id.4xlarge . 2186 |========================================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 25000 - Clients: 1000 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better m6id.4xlarge . 457.43 |======================================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 25000 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better m6id.4xlarge . 1856 |========================================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 25000 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better m6id.4xlarge . 134.68 |======================================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 25000 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better m6id.4xlarge . 1890 |========================================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 25000 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better m6id.4xlarge . 264.84 |======================================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 25000 - Clients: 5000 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 25000 - Clients: 800 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better m6id.4xlarge . 1958 |========================================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 25000 - Clients: 800 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better m6id.4xlarge . 408.51 |======================================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 1000 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better m6id.4xlarge . 3004 |========================================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 1000 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better m6id.4xlarge . 332.97 |======================================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 5000 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 25000 - Clients: 1000 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better m6id.4xlarge . 1941 |========================================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 25000 - Clients: 1000 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better m6id.4xlarge . 515.35 |======================================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 25000 - Clients: 5000 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better SQLite Speedtest 3.30 Timed Time - Size 1,000 Seconds < Lower Is Better m6id.4xlarge . 60.25 |========================================================= Redis 7.0.12 + memtier_benchmark 2.0 Protocol: Redis - Clients: 50 - Set To Get Ratio: 1:1 Ops/sec > Higher Is Better m6id.4xlarge . 2032106.06 |==================================================== Redis 7.0.12 + memtier_benchmark 2.0 Protocol: Redis - Clients: 50 - Set To Get Ratio: 1:5 Ops/sec > Higher Is Better m6id.4xlarge . 2148441.86 |==================================================== Redis 7.0.12 + memtier_benchmark 2.0 Protocol: Redis - Clients: 50 - Set To Get Ratio: 5:1 Ops/sec > Higher Is Better m6id.4xlarge . 1814825.09 |==================================================== Redis 7.0.12 + memtier_benchmark 2.0 Protocol: Redis - Clients: 100 - Set To Get Ratio: 1:1 Ops/sec > Higher Is Better m6id.4xlarge . 1890482.25 |==================================================== Redis 7.0.12 + memtier_benchmark 2.0 Protocol: Redis - Clients: 100 - Set To Get Ratio: 1:5 Ops/sec > Higher Is Better m6id.4xlarge . 2031317.44 |==================================================== Redis 7.0.12 + memtier_benchmark 2.0 Protocol: Redis - Clients: 100 - Set To Get Ratio: 5:1 Ops/sec > Higher Is Better m6id.4xlarge . 1783499.99 |==================================================== Redis 7.0.12 + memtier_benchmark 2.0 Protocol: Redis - Clients: 50 - Set To Get Ratio: 10:1 Ops/sec > Higher Is Better m6id.4xlarge . 1795424.24 |==================================================== Redis 7.0.12 + memtier_benchmark 2.0 Protocol: Redis - Clients: 50 - Set To Get Ratio: 1:10 Ops/sec > Higher Is Better m6id.4xlarge . 2093073.52 |==================================================== Redis 7.0.12 + memtier_benchmark 2.0 Protocol: Redis - Clients: 500 - Set To Get Ratio: 1:1 Ops/sec > Higher Is Better m6id.4xlarge . 1698265.46 |==================================================== Redis 7.0.12 + memtier_benchmark 2.0 Protocol: Redis - Clients: 500 - Set To Get Ratio: 1:5 Ops/sec > Higher Is Better m6id.4xlarge . 1834944.04 |==================================================== Redis 7.0.12 + memtier_benchmark 2.0 Protocol: Redis - Clients: 500 - Set To Get Ratio: 5:1 Ops/sec > Higher Is Better m6id.4xlarge . 1598183.48 |==================================================== Redis 7.0.12 + memtier_benchmark 2.0 Protocol: Redis - Clients: 100 - Set To Get Ratio: 10:1 Ops/sec > Higher Is Better m6id.4xlarge . 1750936.14 |==================================================== Redis 7.0.12 + memtier_benchmark 2.0 Protocol: Redis - Clients: 100 - Set To Get Ratio: 1:10 Ops/sec > Higher Is Better m6id.4xlarge . 1968490.61 |==================================================== Redis 7.0.12 + memtier_benchmark 2.0 Protocol: Redis - Clients: 500 - Set To Get Ratio: 10:1 Ops/sec > Higher Is Better m6id.4xlarge . 1594635.96 |==================================================== Redis 7.0.12 + memtier_benchmark 2.0 Protocol: Redis - Clients: 500 - Set To Get Ratio: 1:10 Ops/sec > Higher Is Better m6id.4xlarge . 1842510.94 |==================================================== Apache Cassandra 4.1.3 Test: Writes Op/s > Higher Is Better Apache Cassandra 4.1.3 Test: Mixed 1:1 Op/s > Higher Is Better Apache Cassandra 4.1.3 Test: Mixed 1:3 Op/s > Higher Is Better RocksDB 9.0 Test: Overwrite Op/s > Higher Is Better m6id.4xlarge . 746101 |======================================================== RocksDB 9.0 Test: Random Fill Op/s > Higher Is Better m6id.4xlarge . 746364 |======================================================== RocksDB 9.0 Test: Random Read Op/s > Higher Is Better m6id.4xlarge . 31235487 |====================================================== RocksDB 9.0 Test: Update Random Op/s > Higher Is Better m6id.4xlarge . 386469 |======================================================== RocksDB 9.0 Test: Sequential Fill Op/s > Higher Is Better m6id.4xlarge . 1054766 |======================================================= RocksDB 9.0 Test: Random Fill Sync Op/s > Higher Is Better m6id.4xlarge . 3215 |========================================================== RocksDB 9.0 Test: Read While Writing Op/s > Higher Is Better m6id.4xlarge . 1458057 |======================================================= RocksDB 9.0 Test: Read Random Write Random Op/s > Higher Is Better m6id.4xlarge . 1305003 |======================================================= nginx 1.23.2 Connections: 1 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better nginx 1.23.2 Connections: 20 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better m6id.4xlarge . 61717.99 |====================================================== nginx 1.23.2 Connections: 100 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better m6id.4xlarge . 72686.04 |====================================================== nginx 1.23.2 Connections: 200 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better m6id.4xlarge . 72623.49 |====================================================== nginx 1.23.2 Connections: 500 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better m6id.4xlarge . 70505.78 |====================================================== nginx 1.23.2 Connections: 1000 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better m6id.4xlarge . 66917.48 |====================================================== nginx 1.23.2 Connections: 4000 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better m6id.4xlarge . 60554.85 |====================================================== Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000 - Test: Scan - Clients: 1 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000 - Test: Scan - Clients: 4 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000 - Test: Scan - Clients: 16 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000 - Test: Scan - Clients: 32 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000 - Test: Scan - Clients: 64 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000 - Test: Scan - Clients: 128 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000 - Test: Scan - Clients: 256 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000 - Test: Scan - Clients: 500 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 1000000 - Test: Scan - Clients: 1 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 1000000 - Test: Scan - Clients: 4 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 2000000 - Test: Scan - Clients: 1 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 2000000 - Test: Scan - Clients: 4 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 1000000 - Test: Scan - Clients: 16 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 1000000 - Test: Scan - Clients: 32 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 1000000 - Test: Scan - Clients: 64 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000000 - Test: Scan - Clients: 1 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000000 - Test: Scan - Clients: 4 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 2000000 - Test: Scan - Clients: 16 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 2000000 - Test: Scan - Clients: 32 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 2000000 - Test: Scan - Clients: 64 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 1000000 - Test: Scan - Clients: 128 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 1000000 - Test: Scan - Clients: 256 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 1000000 - Test: Scan - Clients: 500 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000000 - Test: Scan - Clients: 16 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000000 - Test: Scan - Clients: 32 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000000 - Test: Scan - Clients: 64 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 2000000 - Test: Scan - Clients: 128 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 2000000 - Test: Scan - Clients: 256 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 2000000 - Test: Scan - Clients: 500 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000 - Test: Increment - Clients: 1 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000 - Test: Increment - Clients: 4 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000000 - Test: Scan - Clients: 128 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000000 - Test: Scan - Clients: 256 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000000 - Test: Scan - Clients: 500 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000 - Test: Increment - Clients: 16 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000 - Test: Increment - Clients: 32 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000 - Test: Increment - Clients: 64 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000 - Test: Increment - Clients: 128 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000 - Test: Increment - Clients: 256 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000 - Test: Increment - Clients: 500 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000 - Test: Random Read - Clients: 1 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000 - Test: Random Read - Clients: 4 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 1000000 - Test: Increment - Clients: 1 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 1000000 - Test: Increment - Clients: 4 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 2000000 - Test: Increment - Clients: 1 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 2000000 - Test: Increment - Clients: 4 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000 - Test: Random Read - Clients: 16 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000 - Test: Random Read - Clients: 32 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000 - Test: Random Read - Clients: 64 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000 - Test: Random Write - Clients: 1 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000 - Test: Random Write - Clients: 4 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 1000000 - Test: Increment - Clients: 16 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 1000000 - Test: Increment - Clients: 32 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 1000000 - Test: Increment - Clients: 64 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000000 - Test: Increment - Clients: 1 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000000 - Test: Increment - Clients: 4 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 2000000 - Test: Increment - Clients: 16 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 2000000 - Test: Increment - Clients: 32 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 2000000 - Test: Increment - Clients: 64 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000 - Test: Random Read - Clients: 128 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000 - Test: Random Read - Clients: 256 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000 - Test: Random Read - Clients: 500 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000 - Test: Random Write - Clients: 16 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000 - Test: Random Write - Clients: 32 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000 - Test: Random Write - Clients: 64 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 1000000 - Test: Increment - Clients: 128 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 1000000 - Test: Increment - Clients: 256 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 1000000 - Test: Increment - Clients: 500 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 1000000 - Test: Random Read - Clients: 1 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 1000000 - Test: Random Read - Clients: 4 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000000 - Test: Increment - Clients: 16 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000000 - Test: Increment - Clients: 32 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000000 - Test: Increment - Clients: 64 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 2000000 - Test: Increment - Clients: 128 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 2000000 - Test: Increment - Clients: 256 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 2000000 - Test: Increment - Clients: 500 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 2000000 - Test: Random Read - Clients: 1 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 2000000 - Test: Random Read - Clients: 4 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000 - Test: Random Write - Clients: 128 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000 - Test: Random Write - Clients: 256 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000 - Test: Random Write - Clients: 500 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 1000000 - Test: Random Read - Clients: 16 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 1000000 - Test: Random Read - Clients: 32 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 1000000 - Test: Random Read - Clients: 64 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 1000000 - Test: Random Write - Clients: 1 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 1000000 - Test: Random Write - Clients: 4 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000000 - Test: Increment - Clients: 128 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000000 - Test: Increment - Clients: 256 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000000 - Test: Increment - Clients: 500 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000000 - Test: Random Read - Clients: 1 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000000 - Test: Random Read - Clients: 4 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 2000000 - Test: Random Read - Clients: 16 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 2000000 - Test: Random Read - Clients: 32 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 2000000 - Test: Random Read - Clients: 64 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 2000000 - Test: Random Write - Clients: 1 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 2000000 - Test: Random Write - Clients: 4 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000 - Test: Sequential Read - Clients: 1 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000 - Test: Sequential Read - Clients: 4 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 1000000 - Test: Random Read - Clients: 128 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 1000000 - Test: Random Read - Clients: 256 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 1000000 - Test: Random Read - Clients: 500 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 1000000 - Test: Random Write - Clients: 16 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 1000000 - Test: Random Write - Clients: 32 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 1000000 - Test: Random Write - Clients: 64 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000000 - Test: Random Read - Clients: 16 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000000 - Test: Random Read - Clients: 32 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000000 - Test: Random Read - Clients: 64 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000000 - Test: Random Write - Clients: 1 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000000 - Test: Random Write - Clients: 4 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 2000000 - Test: Random Read - Clients: 128 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 2000000 - Test: Random Read - Clients: 256 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 2000000 - Test: Random Read - Clients: 500 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 2000000 - Test: Random Write - Clients: 16 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 2000000 - Test: Random Write - Clients: 32 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 2000000 - Test: Random Write - Clients: 64 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000 - Test: Sequential Read - Clients: 16 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000 - Test: Sequential Read - Clients: 32 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000 - Test: Sequential Read - Clients: 64 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000 - Test: Sequential Write - Clients: 1 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000 - Test: Sequential Write - Clients: 4 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 1000000 - Test: Random Write - Clients: 128 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 1000000 - Test: Random Write - Clients: 256 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 1000000 - Test: Random Write - Clients: 500 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000000 - Test: Random Read - Clients: 128 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000000 - Test: Random Read - Clients: 256 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000000 - Test: Random Read - Clients: 500 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000000 - Test: Random Write - Clients: 16 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000000 - Test: Random Write - Clients: 32 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000000 - Test: Random Write - Clients: 64 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 2000000 - Test: Random Write - Clients: 128 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 2000000 - Test: Random Write - Clients: 256 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 2000000 - Test: Random Write - Clients: 500 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000 - Test: Async Random Read - Clients: 1 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000 - Test: Async Random Read - Clients: 4 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000 - Test: Sequential Read - Clients: 128 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000 - Test: Sequential Read - Clients: 256 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000 - Test: Sequential Read - Clients: 500 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000 - Test: Sequential Write - Clients: 16 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000 - Test: Sequential Write - Clients: 32 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000 - Test: Sequential Write - Clients: 64 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 1000000 - Test: Sequential Read - Clients: 1 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 1000000 - Test: Sequential Read - Clients: 4 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000000 - Test: Random Write - Clients: 128 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000000 - Test: Random Write - Clients: 256 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000000 - Test: Random Write - Clients: 500 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 2000000 - Test: Sequential Read - Clients: 1 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 2000000 - Test: Sequential Read - Clients: 4 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000 - Test: Async Random Read - Clients: 16 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000 - Test: Async Random Read - Clients: 32 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000 - Test: Async Random Read - Clients: 64 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000 - Test: Async Random Write - Clients: 1 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000 - Test: Async Random Write - Clients: 4 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000 - Test: Sequential Write - Clients: 128 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000 - Test: Sequential Write - Clients: 256 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000 - Test: Sequential Write - Clients: 500 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 1000000 - Test: Sequential Read - Clients: 16 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 1000000 - Test: Sequential Read - Clients: 32 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 1000000 - Test: Sequential Read - Clients: 64 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 1000000 - Test: Sequential Write - Clients: 1 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 1000000 - Test: Sequential Write - Clients: 4 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000000 - Test: Sequential Read - Clients: 1 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000000 - Test: Sequential Read - Clients: 4 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 2000000 - Test: Sequential Read - Clients: 16 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 2000000 - Test: Sequential Read - Clients: 32 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 2000000 - Test: Sequential Read - Clients: 64 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 2000000 - Test: Sequential Write - Clients: 1 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 2000000 - Test: Sequential Write - Clients: 4 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000 - Test: Async Random Read - Clients: 128 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000 - Test: Async Random Read - Clients: 256 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000 - Test: Async Random Read - Clients: 500 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000 - Test: Async Random Write - Clients: 16 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000 - Test: Async Random Write - Clients: 32 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000 - Test: Async Random Write - Clients: 64 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 1000000 - Test: Async Random Read - Clients: 1 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 1000000 - Test: Async Random Read - Clients: 4 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 1000000 - Test: Sequential Read - Clients: 128 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 1000000 - Test: Sequential Read - Clients: 256 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 1000000 - Test: Sequential Read - Clients: 500 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 1000000 - Test: Sequential Write - Clients: 16 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 1000000 - Test: Sequential Write - Clients: 32 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 1000000 - Test: Sequential Write - Clients: 64 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000000 - Test: Sequential Read - Clients: 16 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000000 - Test: Sequential Read - Clients: 32 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000000 - Test: Sequential Read - Clients: 64 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000000 - Test: Sequential Write - Clients: 1 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000000 - Test: Sequential Write - Clients: 4 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 2000000 - Test: Async Random Read - Clients: 1 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 2000000 - Test: Async Random Read - Clients: 4 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 2000000 - Test: Sequential Read - Clients: 128 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 2000000 - Test: Sequential Read - Clients: 256 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 2000000 - Test: Sequential Read - Clients: 500 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 2000000 - Test: Sequential Write - Clients: 16 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 2000000 - Test: Sequential Write - Clients: 32 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 2000000 - Test: Sequential Write - Clients: 64 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000 - Test: Async Random Write - Clients: 128 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000 - Test: Async Random Write - Clients: 256 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000 - Test: Async Random Write - Clients: 500 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 1000000 - Test: Async Random Read - Clients: 16 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 1000000 - Test: Async Random Read - Clients: 32 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 1000000 - Test: Async Random Read - Clients: 64 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 1000000 - Test: Async Random Write - Clients: 1 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 1000000 - Test: Async Random Write - Clients: 4 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 1000000 - Test: Sequential Write - Clients: 128 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 1000000 - Test: Sequential Write - Clients: 256 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 1000000 - Test: Sequential Write - Clients: 500 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000000 - Test: Async Random Read - Clients: 1 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000000 - Test: Async Random Read - Clients: 4 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000000 - Test: Sequential Read - Clients: 128 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000000 - Test: Sequential Read - Clients: 256 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000000 - Test: Sequential Read - Clients: 500 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000000 - Test: Sequential Write - Clients: 16 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000000 - Test: Sequential Write - Clients: 32 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000000 - Test: Sequential Write - Clients: 64 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 2000000 - Test: Async Random Read - Clients: 16 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 2000000 - Test: Async Random Read - Clients: 32 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 2000000 - Test: Async Random Read - Clients: 64 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 2000000 - Test: Async Random Write - Clients: 1 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 2000000 - Test: Async Random Write - Clients: 4 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 2000000 - Test: Sequential Write - Clients: 128 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 2000000 - Test: Sequential Write - Clients: 256 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 2000000 - Test: Sequential Write - Clients: 500 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 1000000 - Test: Async Random Read - Clients: 128 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 1000000 - Test: Async Random Read - Clients: 256 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 1000000 - Test: Async Random Read - Clients: 500 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 1000000 - Test: Async Random Write - Clients: 16 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 1000000 - Test: Async Random Write - Clients: 32 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 1000000 - Test: Async Random Write - Clients: 64 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000000 - Test: Async Random Read - Clients: 16 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000000 - Test: Async Random Read - Clients: 32 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000000 - Test: Async Random Read - Clients: 64 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000000 - Test: Async Random Write - Clients: 1 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000000 - Test: Async Random Write - Clients: 4 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000000 - Test: Sequential Write - Clients: 128 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000000 - Test: Sequential Write - Clients: 256 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000000 - Test: Sequential Write - Clients: 500 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 2000000 - Test: Async Random Read - Clients: 128 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 2000000 - Test: Async Random Read - Clients: 256 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 2000000 - Test: Async Random Read - Clients: 500 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 2000000 - Test: Async Random Write - Clients: 16 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 2000000 - Test: Async Random Write - Clients: 32 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 2000000 - Test: Async Random Write - Clients: 64 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 1000000 - Test: Async Random Write - Clients: 128 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 1000000 - Test: Async Random Write - Clients: 256 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 1000000 - Test: Async Random Write - Clients: 500 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000000 - Test: Async Random Read - Clients: 128 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000000 - Test: Async Random Read - Clients: 256 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000000 - Test: Async Random Read - Clients: 500 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000000 - Test: Async Random Write - Clients: 16 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000000 - Test: Async Random Write - Clients: 32 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000000 - Test: Async Random Write - Clients: 64 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 2000000 - Test: Async Random Write - Clients: 128 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 2000000 - Test: Async Random Write - Clients: 256 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 2000000 - Test: Async Random Write - Clients: 500 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000000 - Test: Async Random Write - Clients: 128 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000000 - Test: Async Random Write - Clients: 256 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000000 - Test: Async Random Write - Clients: 500 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HTTP Server 2.4.56 Concurrent Requests: 4 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HTTP Server 2.4.56 Concurrent Requests: 20 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better m6id.4xlarge . 32012.52 |====================================================== Apache HTTP Server 2.4.56 Concurrent Requests: 100 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better m6id.4xlarge . 77430.27 |====================================================== Apache HTTP Server 2.4.56 Concurrent Requests: 200 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better m6id.4xlarge . 91609.30 |====================================================== Apache HTTP Server 2.4.56 Concurrent Requests: 500 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better m6id.4xlarge . 75664.26 |====================================================== Apache HTTP Server 2.4.56 Concurrent Requests: 1000 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better m6id.4xlarge . 72182.27 |====================================================== PHPBench 0.8.1 PHP Benchmark Suite Score > Higher Is Better m6id.4xlarge . 808361 |======================================================== PHP Micro Benchmarks Test: Zend bench Seconds < Lower Is Better m6id.4xlarge . 0.286 |========================================================= PHP Micro Benchmarks Test: Zend micro_bench Seconds < Lower Is Better m6id.4xlarge . 1.653 |========================================================= InfluxDB 1.8.2 Concurrent Streams: 4 - Batch Size: 10000 - Tags: 2,5000,1 - Points Per Series: 10000 val/sec > Higher Is Better m6id.4xlarge . 1274220.8 |===================================================== InfluxDB 1.8.2 Concurrent Streams: 64 - Batch Size: 10000 - Tags: 2,5000,1 - Points Per Series: 10000 val/sec > Higher Is Better m6id.4xlarge . 1351439.9 |===================================================== InfluxDB 1.8.2 Concurrent Streams: 1024 - Batch Size: 10000 - Tags: 2,5000,1 - Points Per Series: 10000 val/sec > Higher Is Better m6id.4xlarge . 1353824.0 |=====================================================