serverJet-benchmark m7a.4xlarge m7a.4xlarge: Processor: AMD EPYC 9R14 (16 Cores), Motherboard: Amazon EC2 m7a.4xlarge (1.0 BIOS), Chipset: Intel 440FX 82441FX PMC, Memory: 62GB, Disk: 1104GB Amazon Elastic Block Store, Graphics: simpledrmdrmfb, Network: Amazon Elastic OS: Ubuntu 24.04, Kernel: 6.8.0-1009-aws (x86_64), Compiler: GCC 13.2.0, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 800x600, System Layer: amazon InfluxDB 1.8.2 Concurrent Streams: 1024 - Batch Size: 10000 - Tags: 2,5000,1 - Points Per Series: 10000 val/sec > Higher Is Better m7a.4xlarge . 2223517.8 |====================================================== InfluxDB 1.8.2 Concurrent Streams: 64 - Batch Size: 10000 - Tags: 2,5000,1 - Points Per Series: 10000 val/sec > Higher Is Better m7a.4xlarge . 2221920.5 |====================================================== InfluxDB 1.8.2 Concurrent Streams: 4 - Batch Size: 10000 - Tags: 2,5000,1 - Points Per Series: 10000 val/sec > Higher Is Better m7a.4xlarge . 1549082.1 |====================================================== PHP Micro Benchmarks Test: Zend micro_bench Seconds < Lower Is Better m7a.4xlarge . 1.551 |========================================================== PHP Micro Benchmarks Test: Zend bench Seconds < Lower Is Better m7a.4xlarge . 0.306 |========================================================== PHPBench 0.8.1 PHP Benchmark Suite Score > Higher Is Better m7a.4xlarge . 832072 |========================================================= Apache HTTP Server 2.4.56 Concurrent Requests: 1000 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better m7a.4xlarge . 56504.73 |======================================================= Apache HTTP Server 2.4.56 Concurrent Requests: 500 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better m7a.4xlarge . 59103.11 |======================================================= Apache HTTP Server 2.4.56 Concurrent Requests: 200 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better m7a.4xlarge . 77929.53 |======================================================= Apache HTTP Server 2.4.56 Concurrent Requests: 100 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better m7a.4xlarge . 67646.22 |======================================================= Apache HTTP Server 2.4.56 Concurrent Requests: 20 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better m7a.4xlarge . 48174.04 |======================================================= nginx 1.23.2 Connections: 4000 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better m7a.4xlarge . 70586.91 |======================================================= nginx 1.23.2 Connections: 1000 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better m7a.4xlarge . 73562.84 |======================================================= nginx 1.23.2 Connections: 500 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better m7a.4xlarge . 76287.45 |======================================================= nginx 1.23.2 Connections: 200 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better m7a.4xlarge . 74306.67 |======================================================= nginx 1.23.2 Connections: 100 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better m7a.4xlarge . 72599.88 |======================================================= nginx 1.23.2 Connections: 20 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better m7a.4xlarge . 59247.89 |======================================================= RocksDB 9.0 Test: Read Random Write Random Op/s > Higher Is Better m7a.4xlarge . 1689896 |======================================================== RocksDB 9.0 Test: Read While Writing Op/s > Higher Is Better m7a.4xlarge . 1985871 |======================================================== RocksDB 9.0 Test: Random Fill Sync Op/s > Higher Is Better m7a.4xlarge . 3152 |=========================================================== RocksDB 9.0 Test: Sequential Fill Op/s > Higher Is Better m7a.4xlarge . 927852 |========================================================= RocksDB 9.0 Test: Update Random Op/s > Higher Is Better m7a.4xlarge . 490322 |========================================================= RocksDB 9.0 Test: Random Read Op/s > Higher Is Better m7a.4xlarge . 101734417 |====================================================== RocksDB 9.0 Test: Random Fill Op/s > Higher Is Better m7a.4xlarge . 759414 |========================================================= RocksDB 9.0 Test: Overwrite Op/s > Higher Is Better m7a.4xlarge . 757159 |========================================================= Redis 7.0.12 + memtier_benchmark 2.0 Protocol: Redis - Clients: 500 - Set To Get Ratio: 1:10 Ops/sec > Higher Is Better m7a.4xlarge . 2393192.59 |===================================================== Redis 7.0.12 + memtier_benchmark 2.0 Protocol: Redis - Clients: 500 - Set To Get Ratio: 10:1 Ops/sec > Higher Is Better m7a.4xlarge . 2125097.52 |===================================================== Redis 7.0.12 + memtier_benchmark 2.0 Protocol: Redis - Clients: 100 - Set To Get Ratio: 1:10 Ops/sec > Higher Is Better m7a.4xlarge . 2330495.60 |===================================================== Redis 7.0.12 + memtier_benchmark 2.0 Protocol: Redis - Clients: 100 - Set To Get Ratio: 10:1 Ops/sec > Higher Is Better m7a.4xlarge . 2029637.43 |===================================================== Redis 7.0.12 + memtier_benchmark 2.0 Protocol: Redis - Clients: 500 - Set To Get Ratio: 5:1 Ops/sec > Higher Is Better m7a.4xlarge . 2142215.61 |===================================================== Redis 7.0.12 + memtier_benchmark 2.0 Protocol: Redis - Clients: 500 - Set To Get Ratio: 1:5 Ops/sec > Higher Is Better m7a.4xlarge . 2433456.55 |===================================================== Redis 7.0.12 + memtier_benchmark 2.0 Protocol: Redis - Clients: 500 - Set To Get Ratio: 1:1 Ops/sec > Higher Is Better m7a.4xlarge . 2264659.06 |===================================================== Redis 7.0.12 + memtier_benchmark 2.0 Protocol: Redis - Clients: 50 - Set To Get Ratio: 1:10 Ops/sec > Higher Is Better m7a.4xlarge . 2229810.71 |===================================================== Redis 7.0.12 + memtier_benchmark 2.0 Protocol: Redis - Clients: 50 - Set To Get Ratio: 10:1 Ops/sec > Higher Is Better m7a.4xlarge . 1961793.70 |===================================================== Redis 7.0.12 + memtier_benchmark 2.0 Protocol: Redis - Clients: 100 - Set To Get Ratio: 5:1 Ops/sec > Higher Is Better m7a.4xlarge . 2109676.94 |===================================================== Redis 7.0.12 + memtier_benchmark 2.0 Protocol: Redis - Clients: 100 - Set To Get Ratio: 1:5 Ops/sec > Higher Is Better m7a.4xlarge . 2382448.82 |===================================================== Redis 7.0.12 + memtier_benchmark 2.0 Protocol: Redis - Clients: 100 - Set To Get Ratio: 1:1 Ops/sec > Higher Is Better m7a.4xlarge . 2237896.31 |===================================================== Redis 7.0.12 + memtier_benchmark 2.0 Protocol: Redis - Clients: 50 - Set To Get Ratio: 5:1 Ops/sec > Higher Is Better m7a.4xlarge . 2088705.84 |===================================================== Redis 7.0.12 + memtier_benchmark 2.0 Protocol: Redis - Clients: 50 - Set To Get Ratio: 1:5 Ops/sec > Higher Is Better m7a.4xlarge . 2503537.68 |===================================================== Redis 7.0.12 + memtier_benchmark 2.0 Protocol: Redis - Clients: 50 - Set To Get Ratio: 1:1 Ops/sec > Higher Is Better m7a.4xlarge . 2407669.48 |===================================================== SQLite Speedtest 3.30 Timed Time - Size 1,000 Seconds < Lower Is Better m7a.4xlarge . 71.20 |========================================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 25000 - Clients: 1000 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better m7a.4xlarge . 530.95 |========================================================= PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 25000 - Clients: 1000 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better m7a.4xlarge . 1886 |=========================================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 1000 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better m7a.4xlarge . 330.39 |========================================================= PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 1000 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better m7a.4xlarge . 3027 |=========================================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 25000 - Clients: 800 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better m7a.4xlarge . 418.39 |========================================================= PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 25000 - Clients: 800 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better m7a.4xlarge . 1912 |=========================================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 25000 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better m7a.4xlarge . 261.11 |========================================================= PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 25000 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better m7a.4xlarge . 1915 |=========================================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 25000 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better m7a.4xlarge . 134.60 |========================================================= PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 25000 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better m7a.4xlarge . 1857 |=========================================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 25000 - Clients: 1000 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better m7a.4xlarge . 458.40 |========================================================= PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 25000 - Clients: 1000 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better m7a.4xlarge . 2182 |=========================================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 25000 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better m7a.4xlarge . 59.60 |========================================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 25000 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better m7a.4xlarge . 1678 |=========================================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 800 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better m7a.4xlarge . 276.08 |========================================================= PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 800 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better m7a.4xlarge . 2898 |=========================================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better m7a.4xlarge . 179.85 |========================================================= PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better m7a.4xlarge . 2780 |=========================================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better m7a.4xlarge . 95.35 |========================================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better m7a.4xlarge . 2622 |=========================================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 1000 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better m7a.4xlarge . 283.08 |========================================================= PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 1000 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better m7a.4xlarge . 3533 |=========================================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better m7a.4xlarge . 43.81 |========================================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better m7a.4xlarge . 2282 |=========================================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 25000 - Clients: 800 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better m7a.4xlarge . 366.04 |========================================================= PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 25000 - Clients: 800 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better m7a.4xlarge . 2186 |=========================================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 25000 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better m7a.4xlarge . 227.97 |========================================================= PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 25000 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better m7a.4xlarge . 2193 |=========================================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 25000 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better m7a.4xlarge . 34.65 |========================================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 25000 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better m7a.4xlarge . 1443 |=========================================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 25000 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better m7a.4xlarge . 114.62 |========================================================= PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 25000 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better m7a.4xlarge . 2181 |=========================================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 25000 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better m7a.4xlarge . 48.24 |========================================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 25000 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better m7a.4xlarge . 2073 |=========================================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 800 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better m7a.4xlarge . 226.52 |========================================================= PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 800 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better m7a.4xlarge . 3532 |=========================================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better m7a.4xlarge . 141.70 |========================================================= PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better m7a.4xlarge . 3529 |=========================================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better m7a.4xlarge . 25.17 |========================================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better m7a.4xlarge . 1987 |=========================================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better m7a.4xlarge . 70.92 |========================================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better m7a.4xlarge . 3525 |=========================================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better m7a.4xlarge . 30.02 |========================================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better m7a.4xlarge . 3332 |=========================================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 800 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better m7a.4xlarge . 186.79 |========================================================= PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 800 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better m7a.4xlarge . 4283 |=========================================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better m7a.4xlarge . 59.62 |========================================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better m7a.4xlarge . 4206 |=========================================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 1000 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better m7a.4xlarge . 3.614 |========================================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 1000 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better m7a.4xlarge . 276928 |========================================================= PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better m7a.4xlarge . 29.70 |========================================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better m7a.4xlarge . 3369 |=========================================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 1000 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better m7a.4xlarge . 225.71 |========================================================= PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 1000 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better m7a.4xlarge . 4431 |=========================================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 25000 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better m7a.4xlarge . 25.02 |========================================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 25000 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better m7a.4xlarge . 1998 |=========================================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 25000 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better m7a.4xlarge . 2.099 |========================================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 25000 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better m7a.4xlarge . 477 |============================================================ PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better m7a.4xlarge . 15.27 |========================================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better m7a.4xlarge . 3274 |=========================================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better m7a.4xlarge . 1.696 |========================================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better m7a.4xlarge . 590 |============================================================ PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 800 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better m7a.4xlarge . 2.607 |========================================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 800 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better m7a.4xlarge . 307139 |========================================================= PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better m7a.4xlarge . 1.342 |========================================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better m7a.4xlarge . 372586 |========================================================= PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better m7a.4xlarge . 23.02 |========================================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better m7a.4xlarge . 2173 |=========================================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better m7a.4xlarge . 0.609 |========================================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better m7a.4xlarge . 410419 |========================================================= PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better m7a.4xlarge . 0.235 |========================================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better m7a.4xlarge . 425120 |========================================================= PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 800 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better m7a.4xlarge . 182.76 |========================================================= PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 800 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better m7a.4xlarge . 4377 |=========================================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better m7a.4xlarge . 114.28 |========================================================= PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better m7a.4xlarge . 4375 |=========================================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better m7a.4xlarge . 57.53 |========================================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better m7a.4xlarge . 4345 |=========================================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 1000 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better m7a.4xlarge . 2.526 |========================================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 1000 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better m7a.4xlarge . 396323 |========================================================= PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better m7a.4xlarge . 21.18 |========================================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better m7a.4xlarge . 4722 |=========================================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 25000 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better m7a.4xlarge . 0.892 |========================================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 25000 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better m7a.4xlarge . 1122 |=========================================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better m7a.4xlarge . 0.547 |========================================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better m7a.4xlarge . 1829 |=========================================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better m7a.4xlarge . 0.118 |========================================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better m7a.4xlarge . 424690 |========================================================= PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 800 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better m7a.4xlarge . 1.913 |========================================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 800 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better m7a.4xlarge . 418385 |========================================================= PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better m7a.4xlarge . 0.994 |========================================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better m7a.4xlarge . 502942 |========================================================= PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better m7a.4xlarge . 10.79 |========================================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better m7a.4xlarge . 4634 |=========================================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better m7a.4xlarge . 0.437 |========================================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better m7a.4xlarge . 572348 |========================================================= PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better m7a.4xlarge . 0.160 |========================================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better m7a.4xlarge . 623599 |========================================================= PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 1000 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better m7a.4xlarge . 1647.03 |======================================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 1000 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better m7a.4xlarge . 607 |============================================================ PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better m7a.4xlarge . 0.026 |========================================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better m7a.4xlarge . 38932 |========================================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better m7a.4xlarge . 0.077 |========================================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better m7a.4xlarge . 651246 |========================================================= PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better m7a.4xlarge . 1.057 |========================================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better m7a.4xlarge . 946 |============================================================ PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 800 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better m7a.4xlarge . 1244.93 |======================================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 800 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better m7a.4xlarge . 643 |============================================================ PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better m7a.4xlarge . 610.20 |========================================================= PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better m7a.4xlarge . 819 |============================================================ PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better m7a.4xlarge . 280.85 |========================================================= PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better m7a.4xlarge . 890 |============================================================ PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 1000 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better m7a.4xlarge . 2.188 |========================================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 1000 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better m7a.4xlarge . 456969 |========================================================= PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better m7a.4xlarge . 102.15 |========================================================= PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better m7a.4xlarge . 979 |============================================================ PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better m7a.4xlarge . 0.021 |========================================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better m7a.4xlarge . 46897 |========================================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 800 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better m7a.4xlarge . 1.569 |========================================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 800 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better m7a.4xlarge . 509818 |========================================================= PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better m7a.4xlarge . 0.820 |========================================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better m7a.4xlarge . 609585 |========================================================= PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better m7a.4xlarge . 49.59 |========================================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better m7a.4xlarge . 1008 |=========================================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better m7a.4xlarge . 0.368 |========================================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better m7a.4xlarge . 678611 |========================================================= PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better m7a.4xlarge . 0.140 |========================================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better m7a.4xlarge . 713385 |========================================================= PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better m7a.4xlarge . 0.067 |========================================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better m7a.4xlarge . 739688 |========================================================= PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better m7a.4xlarge . 0.989 |========================================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better m7a.4xlarge . 1011 |=========================================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better m7a.4xlarge . 0.019 |========================================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better m7a.4xlarge . 53244 |========================================================== MariaDB mariadb-slap 11.5 Clients: 4096 Queries Per Second > Higher Is Better m7a.4xlarge . 2 |============================================================== MariaDB mariadb-slap 11.5 Clients: 2048 Queries Per Second > Higher Is Better m7a.4xlarge . 4 |============================================================== MariaDB mariadb-slap 11.5 Clients: 1024 Queries Per Second > Higher Is Better m7a.4xlarge . 43 |============================================================= MariaDB mariadb-slap 11.5 Clients: 512 Queries Per Second > Higher Is Better m7a.4xlarge . 109 |============================================================ MariaDB mariadb-slap 11.5 Clients: 256 Queries Per Second > Higher Is Better m7a.4xlarge . 195 |============================================================ MariaDB mariadb-slap 11.5 Clients: 128 Queries Per Second > Higher Is Better m7a.4xlarge . 328 |============================================================ MariaDB mariadb-slap 11.5 Clients: 64 Queries Per Second > Higher Is Better m7a.4xlarge . 490 |============================================================ MariaDB mariadb-slap 11.5 Clients: 32 Queries Per Second > Higher Is Better m7a.4xlarge . 665 |============================================================ MariaDB mariadb-slap 11.5 Clients: 1 Queries Per Second > Higher Is Better m7a.4xlarge . 1338 |=========================================================== Redis 7.0.4 Test: LPUSH - Parallel Connections: 1000 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better m7a.4xlarge . 2265754.67 |===================================================== Redis 7.0.4 Test: SADD - Parallel Connections: 1000 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better m7a.4xlarge . 3004793.17 |===================================================== Redis 7.0.4 Test: LPUSH - Parallel Connections: 500 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better m7a.4xlarge . 2144183.92 |===================================================== Redis 7.0.4 Test: LPOP - Parallel Connections: 1000 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better m7a.4xlarge . 2367955.7 |====================================================== Redis 7.0.4 Test: SET - Parallel Connections: 1000 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better m7a.4xlarge . 2778673.33 |===================================================== Redis 7.0.4 Test: SADD - Parallel Connections: 500 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better m7a.4xlarge . 2865906.65 |===================================================== Redis 7.0.4 Test: LPUSH - Parallel Connections: 50 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better m7a.4xlarge . 2049278.00 |===================================================== Redis 7.0.4 Test: LPOP - Parallel Connections: 500 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better m7a.4xlarge . 3761111.60 |===================================================== Redis 7.0.4 Test: GET - Parallel Connections: 1000 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better m7a.4xlarge . 3442562.12 |===================================================== Redis 7.0.4 Test: SET - Parallel Connections: 500 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better m7a.4xlarge . 2721714.50 |===================================================== Redis 7.0.4 Test: SADD - Parallel Connections: 50 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better m7a.4xlarge . 2552382.33 |===================================================== Redis 7.0.4 Test: LPOP - Parallel Connections: 50 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better m7a.4xlarge . 3321732.83 |===================================================== Redis 7.0.4 Test: GET - Parallel Connections: 500 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better m7a.4xlarge . 3397089.50 |===================================================== Redis 7.0.4 Test: SET - Parallel Connections: 50 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better m7a.4xlarge . 2347253.33 |===================================================== Redis 7.0.4 Test: GET - Parallel Connections: 50 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better m7a.4xlarge . 3328383.90 |===================================================== Memcached 1.6.19 Set To Get Ratio: 1:100 Ops/sec > Higher Is Better m7a.4xlarge . 1662936.40 |===================================================== Memcached 1.6.19 Set To Get Ratio: 1:10 Ops/sec > Higher Is Better m7a.4xlarge . 1703836.13 |===================================================== Memcached 1.6.19 Set To Get Ratio: 5:1 Ops/sec > Higher Is Better m7a.4xlarge . 810649.43 |====================================================== Memcached 1.6.19 Set To Get Ratio: 1:5 Ops/sec > Higher Is Better m7a.4xlarge . 1718828.51 |===================================================== Memcached 1.6.19 Set To Get Ratio: 1:1 Ops/sec > Higher Is Better m7a.4xlarge . 1266014.57 |===================================================== ClickHouse 22.12.3.5 100M Rows Hits Dataset, Third Run Queries Per Minute, Geo Mean > Higher Is Better m7a.4xlarge . 266.66 |========================================================= ClickHouse 22.12.3.5 100M Rows Hits Dataset, Second Run Queries Per Minute, Geo Mean > Higher Is Better m7a.4xlarge . 266.64 |========================================================= ClickHouse 22.12.3.5 100M Rows Hits Dataset, First Run / Cold Cache Queries Per Minute, Geo Mean > Higher Is Better m7a.4xlarge . 202.69 |========================================================= Node.js V8 Web Tooling Benchmark runs/s > Higher Is Better m7a.4xlarge . 13.51 |========================================================== OpenSSL 3.3 Algorithm: ChaCha20-Poly1305 byte/s > Higher Is Better m7a.4xlarge . 60213213960 |==================================================== OpenSSL 3.3 Algorithm: AES-256-GCM byte/s > Higher Is Better m7a.4xlarge . 161078897687 |=================================================== OpenSSL 3.3 Algorithm: AES-128-GCM byte/s > Higher Is Better m7a.4xlarge . 185757627553 |=================================================== OpenSSL 3.3 Algorithm: ChaCha20 byte/s > Higher Is Better m7a.4xlarge . 85289192473 |==================================================== OpenSSL 3.3 Algorithm: RSA4096 verify/s > Higher Is Better m7a.4xlarge . 263908.6 |======================================================= OpenSSL 3.3 Algorithm: RSA4096 sign/s > Higher Is Better m7a.4xlarge . 11037.0 |======================================================== OpenSSL 3.3 Algorithm: SHA512 byte/s > Higher Is Better m7a.4xlarge . 7743127807 |===================================================== OpenSSL 3.3 Algorithm: SHA256 byte/s > Higher Is Better m7a.4xlarge . 16636791697 |==================================================== Perl Benchmarks Test: Interpreter Seconds < Lower Is Better m7a.4xlarge . 0.00143856 |===================================================== Perl Benchmarks Test: Pod2html Seconds < Lower Is Better m7a.4xlarge . 0.09485641 |===================================================== Timed Wasmer Compilation 2.3 Time To Compile Seconds < Lower Is Better m7a.4xlarge . 42.05 |========================================================== Timed Erlang/OTP Compilation 25.0 Time To Compile Seconds < Lower Is Better m7a.4xlarge . 90.79 |========================================================== Timed Eigen Compilation 3.3.9 Time To Compile Seconds < Lower Is Better m7a.4xlarge . 88.01 |========================================================== Timed CPython Compilation 3.10.6 Build Configuration: Released Build, PGO + LTO Optimized Seconds < Lower Is Better m7a.4xlarge . 283.54 |========================================================= Timed CPython Compilation 3.10.6 Build Configuration: Default Seconds < Lower Is Better m7a.4xlarge . 21.06 |========================================================== Timed Node.js Compilation 21.7.2 Time To Compile Seconds < Lower Is Better m7a.4xlarge . 753.80 |========================================================= Timed LLVM Compilation 16.0 Build System: Unix Makefiles Seconds < Lower Is Better m7a.4xlarge . 657.17 |========================================================= Timed LLVM Compilation 16.0 Build System: Ninja Seconds < Lower Is Better m7a.4xlarge . 610.92 |========================================================= Timed ImageMagick Compilation 6.9.0 Time To Compile Seconds < Lower Is Better m7a.4xlarge . 24.01 |========================================================== Timed Godot Game Engine Compilation 4.0 Time To Compile Seconds < Lower Is Better m7a.4xlarge . 315.96 |========================================================= Timed Gem5 Compilation 23.0.1 Time To Compile Seconds < Lower Is Better m7a.4xlarge . 460.10 |========================================================= Timed GDB GNU Debugger Compilation 10.2 Time To Compile Seconds < Lower Is Better m7a.4xlarge . 61.23 |========================================================== Timed Apache Compilation 2.4.41 Time To Compile Seconds < Lower Is Better m7a.4xlarge . 22.95 |========================================================== ebizzy 0.3 Records/s > Higher Is Better m7a.4xlarge . 1423925 |======================================================== simdjson 2.0 Throughput Test: DistinctUserID GB/s > Higher Is Better m7a.4xlarge . 6.80 |=========================================================== simdjson 2.0 Throughput Test: PartialTweets GB/s > Higher Is Better m7a.4xlarge . 6.00 |=========================================================== simdjson 2.0 Throughput Test: LargeRandom GB/s > Higher Is Better m7a.4xlarge . 1.25 |=========================================================== simdjson 2.0 Throughput Test: TopTweet GB/s > Higher Is Better m7a.4xlarge . 7.10 |=========================================================== simdjson 2.0 Throughput Test: Kostya GB/s > Higher Is Better m7a.4xlarge . 4.17 |=========================================================== SQLite 3.30.1 Threads / Copies: 128 Seconds < Lower Is Better m7a.4xlarge . 1299.82 |======================================================== SQLite 3.30.1 Threads / Copies: 64 Seconds < Lower Is Better m7a.4xlarge . 652.19 |========================================================= SQLite 3.30.1 Threads / Copies: 32 Seconds < Lower Is Better m7a.4xlarge . 329.70 |========================================================= SQLite 3.30.1 Threads / Copies: 8 Seconds < Lower Is Better m7a.4xlarge . 90.00 |========================================================== SQLite 3.30.1 Threads / Copies: 1 Seconds < Lower Is Better m7a.4xlarge . 33.49 |========================================================== Apache HTTP Server 2.4.56 Concurrent Requests: 4 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000000 - Test: Async Random Write - Clients: 500 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000000 - Test: Async Random Write - Clients: 256 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000000 - Test: Async Random Write - Clients: 128 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 2000000 - Test: Async Random Write - Clients: 500 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 2000000 - Test: Async Random Write - Clients: 256 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 2000000 - Test: Async Random Write - Clients: 128 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000000 - Test: Async Random Write - Clients: 64 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000000 - Test: Async Random Write - Clients: 32 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000000 - Test: Async Random Write - Clients: 16 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000000 - Test: Async Random Read - Clients: 500 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000000 - Test: Async Random Read - Clients: 256 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000000 - Test: Async Random Read - Clients: 128 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 1000000 - Test: Async Random Write - Clients: 500 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 1000000 - Test: Async Random Write - Clients: 256 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 1000000 - Test: Async Random Write - Clients: 128 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 2000000 - Test: Async Random Write - Clients: 64 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 2000000 - Test: Async Random Write - Clients: 32 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 2000000 - Test: Async Random Write - Clients: 16 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 2000000 - Test: Async Random Read - Clients: 500 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 2000000 - Test: Async Random Read - Clients: 256 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 2000000 - Test: Async Random Read - Clients: 128 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000000 - Test: Sequential Write - Clients: 500 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000000 - Test: Sequential Write - Clients: 256 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000000 - Test: Sequential Write - Clients: 128 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000000 - Test: Async Random Write - Clients: 4 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000000 - Test: Async Random Write - Clients: 1 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000000 - Test: Async Random Read - Clients: 64 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000000 - Test: Async Random Read - Clients: 32 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000000 - Test: Async Random Read - Clients: 16 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 1000000 - Test: Async Random Write - Clients: 64 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 1000000 - Test: Async Random Write - Clients: 32 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 1000000 - Test: Async Random Write - Clients: 16 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 1000000 - Test: Async Random Read - Clients: 500 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 1000000 - Test: Async Random Read - Clients: 256 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 1000000 - Test: Async Random Read - Clients: 128 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 2000000 - Test: Sequential Write - Clients: 500 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 2000000 - Test: Sequential Write - Clients: 256 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 2000000 - Test: Sequential Write - Clients: 128 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 2000000 - Test: Async Random Write - Clients: 4 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 2000000 - Test: Async Random Write - Clients: 1 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 2000000 - Test: Async Random Read - Clients: 64 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 2000000 - Test: Async Random Read - Clients: 32 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 2000000 - Test: Async Random Read - Clients: 16 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000000 - Test: Sequential Write - Clients: 64 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000000 - Test: Sequential Write - Clients: 32 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000000 - Test: Sequential Write - Clients: 16 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000000 - Test: Sequential Read - Clients: 500 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000000 - Test: Sequential Read - Clients: 256 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000000 - Test: Sequential Read - Clients: 128 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000000 - Test: Async Random Read - Clients: 4 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000000 - Test: Async Random Read - Clients: 1 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 1000000 - Test: Sequential Write - Clients: 500 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 1000000 - Test: Sequential Write - Clients: 256 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 1000000 - Test: Sequential Write - Clients: 128 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 1000000 - Test: Async Random Write - Clients: 4 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 1000000 - Test: Async Random Write - Clients: 1 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 1000000 - Test: Async Random Read - Clients: 64 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 1000000 - Test: Async Random Read - Clients: 32 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 1000000 - Test: Async Random Read - Clients: 16 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000 - Test: Async Random Write - Clients: 500 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000 - Test: Async Random Write - Clients: 256 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000 - Test: Async Random Write - Clients: 128 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 2000000 - Test: Sequential Write - Clients: 64 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 2000000 - Test: Sequential Write - Clients: 32 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 2000000 - Test: Sequential Write - Clients: 16 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 2000000 - Test: Sequential Read - Clients: 500 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 2000000 - Test: Sequential Read - Clients: 256 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 2000000 - Test: Sequential Read - Clients: 128 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 2000000 - Test: Async Random Read - Clients: 4 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 2000000 - Test: Async Random Read - Clients: 1 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000000 - Test: Sequential Write - Clients: 4 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000000 - Test: Sequential Write - Clients: 1 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000000 - Test: Sequential Read - Clients: 64 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000000 - Test: Sequential Read - Clients: 32 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000000 - Test: Sequential Read - Clients: 16 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 1000000 - Test: Sequential Write - Clients: 64 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 1000000 - Test: Sequential Write - Clients: 32 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 1000000 - Test: Sequential Write - Clients: 16 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 1000000 - Test: Sequential Read - Clients: 500 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 1000000 - Test: Sequential Read - Clients: 256 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 1000000 - Test: Sequential Read - Clients: 128 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 1000000 - Test: Async Random Read - Clients: 4 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 1000000 - Test: Async Random Read - Clients: 1 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000 - Test: Async Random Write - Clients: 64 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000 - Test: Async Random Write - Clients: 32 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000 - Test: Async Random Write - Clients: 16 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000 - Test: Async Random Read - Clients: 500 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000 - Test: Async Random Read - Clients: 256 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000 - Test: Async Random Read - Clients: 128 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 2000000 - Test: Sequential Write - Clients: 4 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 2000000 - Test: Sequential Write - Clients: 1 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 2000000 - Test: Sequential Read - Clients: 64 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 2000000 - Test: Sequential Read - Clients: 32 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 2000000 - Test: Sequential Read - Clients: 16 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000000 - Test: Sequential Read - Clients: 4 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000000 - Test: Sequential Read - Clients: 1 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 1000000 - Test: Sequential Write - Clients: 4 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 1000000 - Test: Sequential Write - Clients: 1 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 1000000 - Test: Sequential Read - Clients: 64 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 1000000 - Test: Sequential Read - Clients: 32 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 1000000 - Test: Sequential Read - Clients: 16 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000 - Test: Sequential Write - Clients: 500 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000 - Test: Sequential Write - Clients: 256 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000 - Test: Sequential Write - Clients: 128 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000 - Test: Async Random Write - Clients: 4 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000 - Test: Async Random Write - Clients: 1 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000 - Test: Async Random Read - Clients: 64 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000 - Test: Async Random Read - Clients: 32 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000 - Test: Async Random Read - Clients: 16 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 2000000 - Test: Sequential Read - Clients: 4 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 2000000 - Test: Sequential Read - Clients: 1 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000000 - Test: Random Write - Clients: 500 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000000 - Test: Random Write - Clients: 256 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000000 - Test: Random Write - Clients: 128 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 1000000 - Test: Sequential Read - Clients: 4 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 1000000 - Test: Sequential Read - Clients: 1 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000 - Test: Sequential Write - Clients: 64 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000 - Test: Sequential Write - Clients: 32 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000 - Test: Sequential Write - Clients: 16 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000 - Test: Sequential Read - Clients: 500 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000 - Test: Sequential Read - Clients: 256 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000 - Test: Sequential Read - Clients: 128 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000 - Test: Async Random Read - Clients: 4 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000 - Test: Async Random Read - Clients: 1 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 2000000 - Test: Random Write - Clients: 500 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 2000000 - Test: Random Write - Clients: 256 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 2000000 - Test: Random Write - Clients: 128 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000000 - Test: Random Write - Clients: 64 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000000 - Test: Random Write - Clients: 32 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000000 - Test: Random Write - Clients: 16 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000000 - Test: Random Read - Clients: 500 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000000 - Test: Random Read - Clients: 256 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000000 - Test: Random Read - Clients: 128 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 1000000 - Test: Random Write - Clients: 500 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 1000000 - Test: Random Write - Clients: 256 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 1000000 - Test: Random Write - Clients: 128 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000 - Test: Sequential Write - Clients: 4 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000 - Test: Sequential Write - Clients: 1 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000 - Test: Sequential Read - Clients: 64 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000 - Test: Sequential Read - Clients: 32 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000 - Test: Sequential Read - Clients: 16 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 2000000 - Test: Random Write - Clients: 64 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 2000000 - Test: Random Write - Clients: 32 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 2000000 - Test: Random Write - Clients: 16 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 2000000 - Test: Random Read - Clients: 500 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 2000000 - Test: Random Read - Clients: 256 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 2000000 - Test: Random Read - Clients: 128 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000000 - Test: Random Write - Clients: 4 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000000 - Test: Random Write - Clients: 1 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000000 - Test: Random Read - Clients: 64 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000000 - Test: Random Read - Clients: 32 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000000 - Test: Random Read - Clients: 16 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 1000000 - Test: Random Write - Clients: 64 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 1000000 - Test: Random Write - Clients: 32 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 1000000 - Test: Random Write - Clients: 16 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 1000000 - Test: Random Read - Clients: 500 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 1000000 - Test: Random Read - Clients: 256 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 1000000 - Test: Random Read - Clients: 128 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000 - Test: Sequential Read - Clients: 4 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000 - Test: Sequential Read - Clients: 1 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 2000000 - Test: Random Write - Clients: 4 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 2000000 - Test: Random Write - Clients: 1 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 2000000 - Test: Random Read - Clients: 64 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 2000000 - Test: Random Read - Clients: 32 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 2000000 - Test: Random Read - Clients: 16 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000000 - Test: Random Read - Clients: 4 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000000 - Test: Random Read - Clients: 1 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000000 - Test: Increment - Clients: 500 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000000 - Test: Increment - Clients: 256 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000000 - Test: Increment - Clients: 128 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 1000000 - Test: Random Write - Clients: 4 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 1000000 - Test: Random Write - Clients: 1 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 1000000 - Test: Random Read - Clients: 64 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 1000000 - Test: Random Read - Clients: 32 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 1000000 - Test: Random Read - Clients: 16 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000 - Test: Random Write - Clients: 500 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000 - Test: Random Write - Clients: 256 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000 - Test: Random Write - Clients: 128 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 2000000 - Test: Random Read - Clients: 4 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 2000000 - Test: Random Read - Clients: 1 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 2000000 - Test: Increment - Clients: 500 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 2000000 - Test: Increment - Clients: 256 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 2000000 - Test: Increment - Clients: 128 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000000 - Test: Increment - Clients: 64 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000000 - Test: Increment - Clients: 32 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000000 - Test: Increment - Clients: 16 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 1000000 - Test: Random Read - Clients: 4 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 1000000 - Test: Random Read - Clients: 1 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 1000000 - Test: Increment - Clients: 500 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 1000000 - Test: Increment - Clients: 256 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 1000000 - Test: Increment - Clients: 128 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000 - Test: Random Write - Clients: 64 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000 - Test: Random Write - Clients: 32 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000 - Test: Random Write - Clients: 16 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000 - Test: Random Read - Clients: 500 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000 - Test: Random Read - Clients: 256 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000 - Test: Random Read - Clients: 128 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 2000000 - Test: Increment - Clients: 64 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 2000000 - Test: Increment - Clients: 32 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 2000000 - Test: Increment - Clients: 16 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000000 - Test: Increment - Clients: 4 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000000 - Test: Increment - Clients: 1 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 1000000 - Test: Increment - Clients: 64 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 1000000 - Test: Increment - Clients: 32 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 1000000 - Test: Increment - Clients: 16 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000 - Test: Random Write - Clients: 4 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000 - Test: Random Write - Clients: 1 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000 - Test: Random Read - Clients: 64 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000 - Test: Random Read - Clients: 32 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000 - Test: Random Read - Clients: 16 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 2000000 - Test: Increment - Clients: 4 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 2000000 - Test: Increment - Clients: 1 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 1000000 - Test: Increment - Clients: 4 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 1000000 - Test: Increment - Clients: 1 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000 - Test: Random Read - Clients: 4 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000 - Test: Random Read - Clients: 1 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000 - Test: Increment - Clients: 500 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000 - Test: Increment - Clients: 256 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000 - Test: Increment - Clients: 128 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000 - Test: Increment - Clients: 64 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000 - Test: Increment - Clients: 32 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000 - Test: Increment - Clients: 16 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000000 - Test: Scan - Clients: 500 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000000 - Test: Scan - Clients: 256 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000000 - Test: Scan - Clients: 128 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000 - Test: Increment - Clients: 4 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000 - Test: Increment - Clients: 1 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 2000000 - Test: Scan - Clients: 500 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 2000000 - Test: Scan - Clients: 256 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 2000000 - Test: Scan - Clients: 128 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000000 - Test: Scan - Clients: 64 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000000 - Test: Scan - Clients: 32 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000000 - Test: Scan - Clients: 16 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 1000000 - Test: Scan - Clients: 500 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 1000000 - Test: Scan - Clients: 256 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 1000000 - Test: Scan - Clients: 128 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 2000000 - Test: Scan - Clients: 64 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 2000000 - Test: Scan - Clients: 32 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 2000000 - Test: Scan - Clients: 16 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000000 - Test: Scan - Clients: 4 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000000 - Test: Scan - Clients: 1 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 1000000 - Test: Scan - Clients: 64 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 1000000 - Test: Scan - Clients: 32 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 1000000 - Test: Scan - Clients: 16 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 2000000 - Test: Scan - Clients: 4 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 2000000 - Test: Scan - Clients: 1 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 1000000 - Test: Scan - Clients: 4 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 1000000 - Test: Scan - Clients: 1 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000 - Test: Scan - Clients: 500 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000 - Test: Scan - Clients: 256 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000 - Test: Scan - Clients: 128 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000 - Test: Scan - Clients: 64 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000 - Test: Scan - Clients: 32 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000 - Test: Scan - Clients: 16 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000 - Test: Scan - Clients: 4 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000 - Test: Scan - Clients: 1 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better nginx 1.23.2 Connections: 1 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache Cassandra 4.1.3 Test: Mixed 1:3 Op/s > Higher Is Better Apache Cassandra 4.1.3 Test: Mixed 1:1 Op/s > Higher Is Better Apache Cassandra 4.1.3 Test: Writes Op/s > Higher Is Better PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 25000 - Clients: 5000 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 5000 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 25000 - Clients: 5000 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 5000 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 5000 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 1000 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better m7a.4xlarge . 235.31 |========================================================= PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 1000 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better m7a.4xlarge . 4320 |=========================================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 5000 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better m7a.4xlarge . 122.48 |========================================================= PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better m7a.4xlarge . 4142 |=========================================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 5000 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 5000 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better m7a.4xlarge . 1.323 |========================================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better m7a.4xlarge . 766 |============================================================ PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 5000 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 5000 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better MariaDB mariadb-slap 11.5 Clients: 8192 Queries Per Second > Higher Is Better m7a.4xlarge . 5 |============================================================== Build2 0.15 Seconds < Lower Is Better Timed PHP Compilation 8.3.4 Seconds < Lower Is Better Timed MPlayer Compilation 1.5 Seconds < Lower Is Better Timed Mesa Compilation 24.0 Seconds < Lower Is Better Timed Linux Kernel Compilation 6.8 Build: allmodconfig Seconds < Lower Is Better Timed Linux Kernel Compilation 6.8 Build: defconfig Seconds < Lower Is Better Timed GCC Compilation 13.2 Seconds < Lower Is Better Timed FFmpeg Compilation 7.0 Seconds < Lower Is Better Node.js Express HTTP Load Test Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better