serverJet-benchmark m6a.4xlarge m6a.4xlarge: Processor: AMD EPYC 7R13 (8 Cores / 16 Threads), Motherboard: Amazon EC2 m6a.4xlarge (1.0 BIOS), Chipset: Intel 440FX 82441FX PMC, Memory: 62GB, Disk: 1104GB Amazon Elastic Block Store, Graphics: simpledrmdrmfb, Network: Amazon Elastic OS: Ubuntu 24.04, Kernel: 6.8.0-1009-aws (x86_64), Compiler: GCC 13.2.0, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 800x600, System Layer: amazon Apache Cassandra 4.1.3 Test: Writes Op/s > Higher Is Better Apache Cassandra 4.1.3 Test: Mixed 1:1 Op/s > Higher Is Better Apache Cassandra 4.1.3 Test: Mixed 1:3 Op/s > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000 - Test: Scan - Clients: 1 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000 - Test: Scan - Clients: 4 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000 - Test: Scan - Clients: 16 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000 - Test: Scan - Clients: 32 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000 - Test: Scan - Clients: 64 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000 - Test: Scan - Clients: 128 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000 - Test: Scan - Clients: 256 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000 - Test: Scan - Clients: 500 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 1000000 - Test: Scan - Clients: 1 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 1000000 - Test: Scan - Clients: 4 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 2000000 - Test: Scan - Clients: 1 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 2000000 - Test: Scan - Clients: 4 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 1000000 - Test: Scan - Clients: 16 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 1000000 - Test: Scan - Clients: 32 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 1000000 - Test: Scan - Clients: 64 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000000 - Test: Scan - Clients: 1 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000000 - Test: Scan - Clients: 4 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 2000000 - Test: Scan - Clients: 16 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 2000000 - Test: Scan - Clients: 32 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 2000000 - Test: Scan - Clients: 64 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 1000000 - Test: Scan - Clients: 128 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 1000000 - Test: Scan - Clients: 256 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 1000000 - Test: Scan - Clients: 500 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000000 - Test: Scan - Clients: 16 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000000 - Test: Scan - Clients: 32 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000000 - Test: Scan - Clients: 64 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 2000000 - Test: Scan - Clients: 128 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 2000000 - Test: Scan - Clients: 256 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 2000000 - Test: Scan - Clients: 500 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000 - Test: Increment - Clients: 1 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000 - Test: Increment - Clients: 4 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000000 - Test: Scan - Clients: 128 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000000 - Test: Scan - Clients: 256 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000000 - Test: Scan - Clients: 500 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000 - Test: Increment - Clients: 16 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000 - Test: Increment - Clients: 32 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000 - Test: Increment - Clients: 64 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000 - Test: Increment - Clients: 128 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000 - Test: Increment - Clients: 256 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000 - Test: Increment - Clients: 500 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000 - Test: Random Read - Clients: 1 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000 - Test: Random Read - Clients: 4 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 1000000 - Test: Increment - Clients: 1 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 1000000 - Test: Increment - Clients: 4 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 2000000 - Test: Increment - Clients: 1 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 2000000 - Test: Increment - Clients: 4 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000 - Test: Random Read - Clients: 16 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000 - Test: Random Read - Clients: 32 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000 - Test: Random Read - Clients: 64 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000 - Test: Random Write - Clients: 1 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000 - Test: Random Write - Clients: 4 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 1000000 - Test: Increment - Clients: 16 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 1000000 - Test: Increment - Clients: 32 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 1000000 - Test: Increment - Clients: 64 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000000 - Test: Increment - Clients: 1 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000000 - Test: Increment - Clients: 4 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 2000000 - Test: Increment - Clients: 16 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 2000000 - Test: Increment - Clients: 32 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 2000000 - Test: Increment - Clients: 64 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000 - Test: Random Read - Clients: 128 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000 - Test: Random Read - Clients: 256 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000 - Test: Random Read - Clients: 500 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000 - Test: Random Write - Clients: 16 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000 - Test: Random Write - Clients: 32 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000 - Test: Random Write - Clients: 64 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 1000000 - Test: Increment - Clients: 128 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 1000000 - Test: Increment - Clients: 256 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 1000000 - Test: Increment - Clients: 500 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 1000000 - Test: Random Read - Clients: 1 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 1000000 - Test: Random Read - Clients: 4 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000000 - Test: Increment - Clients: 16 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000000 - Test: Increment - Clients: 32 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000000 - Test: Increment - Clients: 64 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 2000000 - Test: Increment - Clients: 128 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 2000000 - Test: Increment - Clients: 256 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 2000000 - Test: Increment - Clients: 500 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 2000000 - Test: Random Read - Clients: 1 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 2000000 - Test: Random Read - Clients: 4 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000 - Test: Random Write - Clients: 128 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000 - Test: Random Write - Clients: 256 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000 - Test: Random Write - Clients: 500 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 1000000 - Test: Random Read - Clients: 16 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 1000000 - Test: Random Read - Clients: 32 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 1000000 - Test: Random Read - Clients: 64 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 1000000 - Test: Random Write - Clients: 1 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 1000000 - Test: Random Write - Clients: 4 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000000 - Test: Increment - Clients: 128 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000000 - Test: Increment - Clients: 256 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000000 - Test: Increment - Clients: 500 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000000 - Test: Random Read - Clients: 1 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000000 - Test: Random Read - Clients: 4 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 2000000 - Test: Random Read - Clients: 16 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 2000000 - Test: Random Read - Clients: 32 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 2000000 - Test: Random Read - Clients: 64 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 2000000 - Test: Random Write - Clients: 1 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 2000000 - Test: Random Write - Clients: 4 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000 - Test: Sequential Read - Clients: 1 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000 - Test: Sequential Read - Clients: 4 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 1000000 - Test: Random Read - Clients: 128 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 1000000 - Test: Random Read - Clients: 256 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 1000000 - Test: Random Read - Clients: 500 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 1000000 - Test: Random Write - Clients: 16 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 1000000 - Test: Random Write - Clients: 32 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 1000000 - Test: Random Write - Clients: 64 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000000 - Test: Random Read - Clients: 16 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000000 - Test: Random Read - Clients: 32 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000000 - Test: Random Read - Clients: 64 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000000 - Test: Random Write - Clients: 1 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000000 - Test: Random Write - Clients: 4 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 2000000 - Test: Random Read - Clients: 128 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 2000000 - Test: Random Read - Clients: 256 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 2000000 - Test: Random Read - Clients: 500 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 2000000 - Test: Random Write - Clients: 16 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 2000000 - Test: Random Write - Clients: 32 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 2000000 - Test: Random Write - Clients: 64 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000 - Test: Sequential Read - Clients: 16 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000 - Test: Sequential Read - Clients: 32 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000 - Test: Sequential Read - Clients: 64 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000 - Test: Sequential Write - Clients: 1 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000 - Test: Sequential Write - Clients: 4 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 1000000 - Test: Random Write - Clients: 128 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 1000000 - Test: Random Write - Clients: 256 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 1000000 - Test: Random Write - Clients: 500 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000000 - Test: Random Read - Clients: 128 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000000 - Test: Random Read - Clients: 256 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000000 - Test: Random Read - Clients: 500 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000000 - Test: Random Write - Clients: 16 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000000 - Test: Random Write - Clients: 32 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000000 - Test: Random Write - Clients: 64 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 2000000 - Test: Random Write - Clients: 128 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 2000000 - Test: Random Write - Clients: 256 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 2000000 - Test: Random Write - Clients: 500 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000 - Test: Async Random Read - Clients: 1 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000 - Test: Async Random Read - Clients: 4 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000 - Test: Sequential Read - Clients: 128 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000 - Test: Sequential Read - Clients: 256 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000 - Test: Sequential Read - Clients: 500 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000 - Test: Sequential Write - Clients: 16 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000 - Test: Sequential Write - Clients: 32 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000 - Test: Sequential Write - Clients: 64 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 1000000 - Test: Sequential Read - Clients: 1 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 1000000 - Test: Sequential Read - Clients: 4 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000000 - Test: Random Write - Clients: 128 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000000 - Test: Random Write - Clients: 256 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000000 - Test: Random Write - Clients: 500 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 2000000 - Test: Sequential Read - Clients: 1 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 2000000 - Test: Sequential Read - Clients: 4 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000 - Test: Async Random Read - Clients: 16 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000 - Test: Async Random Read - Clients: 32 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000 - Test: Async Random Read - Clients: 64 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000 - Test: Async Random Write - Clients: 1 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000 - Test: Async Random Write - Clients: 4 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000 - Test: Sequential Write - Clients: 128 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000 - Test: Sequential Write - Clients: 256 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000 - Test: Sequential Write - Clients: 500 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 1000000 - Test: Sequential Read - Clients: 16 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 1000000 - Test: Sequential Read - Clients: 32 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 1000000 - Test: Sequential Read - Clients: 64 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 1000000 - Test: Sequential Write - Clients: 1 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 1000000 - Test: Sequential Write - Clients: 4 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000000 - Test: Sequential Read - Clients: 1 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000000 - Test: Sequential Read - Clients: 4 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 2000000 - Test: Sequential Read - Clients: 16 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 2000000 - Test: Sequential Read - Clients: 32 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 2000000 - Test: Sequential Read - Clients: 64 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 2000000 - Test: Sequential Write - Clients: 1 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 2000000 - Test: Sequential Write - Clients: 4 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000 - Test: Async Random Read - Clients: 128 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000 - Test: Async Random Read - Clients: 256 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000 - Test: Async Random Read - Clients: 500 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000 - Test: Async Random Write - Clients: 16 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000 - Test: Async Random Write - Clients: 32 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000 - Test: Async Random Write - Clients: 64 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 1000000 - Test: Async Random Read - Clients: 1 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 1000000 - Test: Async Random Read - Clients: 4 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 1000000 - Test: Sequential Read - Clients: 128 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 1000000 - Test: Sequential Read - Clients: 256 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 1000000 - Test: Sequential Read - Clients: 500 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 1000000 - Test: Sequential Write - Clients: 16 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 1000000 - Test: Sequential Write - Clients: 32 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 1000000 - Test: Sequential Write - Clients: 64 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000000 - Test: Sequential Read - Clients: 16 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000000 - Test: Sequential Read - Clients: 32 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000000 - Test: Sequential Read - Clients: 64 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000000 - Test: Sequential Write - Clients: 1 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000000 - Test: Sequential Write - Clients: 4 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 2000000 - Test: Async Random Read - Clients: 1 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 2000000 - Test: Async Random Read - Clients: 4 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 2000000 - Test: Sequential Read - Clients: 128 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 2000000 - Test: Sequential Read - Clients: 256 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 2000000 - Test: Sequential Read - Clients: 500 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 2000000 - Test: Sequential Write - Clients: 16 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 2000000 - Test: Sequential Write - Clients: 32 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 2000000 - Test: Sequential Write - Clients: 64 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000 - Test: Async Random Write - Clients: 128 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000 - Test: Async Random Write - Clients: 256 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000 - Test: Async Random Write - Clients: 500 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 1000000 - Test: Async Random Read - Clients: 16 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 1000000 - Test: Async Random Read - Clients: 32 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 1000000 - Test: Async Random Read - Clients: 64 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 1000000 - Test: Async Random Write - Clients: 1 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 1000000 - Test: Async Random Write - Clients: 4 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 1000000 - Test: Sequential Write - Clients: 128 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 1000000 - Test: Sequential Write - Clients: 256 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 1000000 - Test: Sequential Write - Clients: 500 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000000 - Test: Async Random Read - Clients: 1 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000000 - Test: Async Random Read - Clients: 4 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000000 - Test: Sequential Read - Clients: 128 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000000 - Test: Sequential Read - Clients: 256 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000000 - Test: Sequential Read - Clients: 500 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000000 - Test: Sequential Write - Clients: 16 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000000 - Test: Sequential Write - Clients: 32 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000000 - Test: Sequential Write - Clients: 64 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 2000000 - Test: Async Random Read - Clients: 16 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 2000000 - Test: Async Random Read - Clients: 32 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 2000000 - Test: Async Random Read - Clients: 64 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 2000000 - Test: Async Random Write - Clients: 1 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 2000000 - Test: Async Random Write - Clients: 4 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 2000000 - Test: Sequential Write - Clients: 128 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 2000000 - Test: Sequential Write - Clients: 256 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 2000000 - Test: Sequential Write - Clients: 500 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 1000000 - Test: Async Random Read - Clients: 128 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 1000000 - Test: Async Random Read - Clients: 256 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 1000000 - Test: Async Random Read - Clients: 500 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 1000000 - Test: Async Random Write - Clients: 16 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 1000000 - Test: Async Random Write - Clients: 32 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 1000000 - Test: Async Random Write - Clients: 64 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000000 - Test: Async Random Read - Clients: 16 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000000 - Test: Async Random Read - Clients: 32 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000000 - Test: Async Random Read - Clients: 64 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000000 - Test: Async Random Write - Clients: 1 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000000 - Test: Async Random Write - Clients: 4 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000000 - Test: Sequential Write - Clients: 128 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000000 - Test: Sequential Write - Clients: 256 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000000 - Test: Sequential Write - Clients: 500 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 2000000 - Test: Async Random Read - Clients: 128 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 2000000 - Test: Async Random Read - Clients: 256 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 2000000 - Test: Async Random Read - Clients: 500 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 2000000 - Test: Async Random Write - Clients: 16 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 2000000 - Test: Async Random Write - Clients: 32 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 2000000 - Test: Async Random Write - Clients: 64 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 1000000 - Test: Async Random Write - Clients: 128 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 1000000 - Test: Async Random Write - Clients: 256 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 1000000 - Test: Async Random Write - Clients: 500 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000000 - Test: Async Random Read - Clients: 128 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000000 - Test: Async Random Read - Clients: 256 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000000 - Test: Async Random Read - Clients: 500 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000000 - Test: Async Random Write - Clients: 16 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000000 - Test: Async Random Write - Clients: 32 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000000 - Test: Async Random Write - Clients: 64 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 2000000 - Test: Async Random Write - Clients: 128 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 2000000 - Test: Async Random Write - Clients: 256 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 2000000 - Test: Async Random Write - Clients: 500 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000000 - Test: Async Random Write - Clients: 128 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000000 - Test: Async Random Write - Clients: 256 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000000 - Test: Async Random Write - Clients: 500 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HTTP Server 2.4.56 Concurrent Requests: 4 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HTTP Server 2.4.56 Concurrent Requests: 20 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better m6a.4xlarge . 27355.16 |======================================================= Apache HTTP Server 2.4.56 Concurrent Requests: 100 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better m6a.4xlarge . 59129.91 |======================================================= Apache HTTP Server 2.4.56 Concurrent Requests: 200 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better m6a.4xlarge . 68204.61 |======================================================= Apache HTTP Server 2.4.56 Concurrent Requests: 500 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better m6a.4xlarge . 52927.10 |======================================================= Apache HTTP Server 2.4.56 Concurrent Requests: 1000 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better m6a.4xlarge . 48584.05 |======================================================= Build2 0.15 Seconds < Lower Is Better ClickHouse 22.12.3.5 100M Rows Hits Dataset, First Run / Cold Cache Queries Per Minute, Geo Mean > Higher Is Better m6a.4xlarge . 140.66 |========================================================= ClickHouse 22.12.3.5 100M Rows Hits Dataset, Second Run Queries Per Minute, Geo Mean > Higher Is Better m6a.4xlarge . 167.70 |========================================================= ClickHouse 22.12.3.5 100M Rows Hits Dataset, Third Run Queries Per Minute, Geo Mean > Higher Is Better m6a.4xlarge . 169.26 |========================================================= ebizzy 0.3 Records/s > Higher Is Better m6a.4xlarge . 594529 |========================================================= InfluxDB 1.8.2 Concurrent Streams: 4 - Batch Size: 10000 - Tags: 2,5000,1 - Points Per Series: 10000 val/sec > Higher Is Better m6a.4xlarge . 1365207.9 |====================================================== InfluxDB 1.8.2 Concurrent Streams: 64 - Batch Size: 10000 - Tags: 2,5000,1 - Points Per Series: 10000 val/sec > Higher Is Better m6a.4xlarge . 1443436.7 |====================================================== InfluxDB 1.8.2 Concurrent Streams: 1024 - Batch Size: 10000 - Tags: 2,5000,1 - Points Per Series: 10000 val/sec > Higher Is Better m6a.4xlarge . 1440600.2 |====================================================== MariaDB mariadb-slap 11.5 Clients: 1 Queries Per Second > Higher Is Better m6a.4xlarge . 1159 |=========================================================== MariaDB mariadb-slap 11.5 Clients: 32 Queries Per Second > Higher Is Better m6a.4xlarge . 568 |============================================================ MariaDB mariadb-slap 11.5 Clients: 64 Queries Per Second > Higher Is Better m6a.4xlarge . 375 |============================================================ MariaDB mariadb-slap 11.5 Clients: 128 Queries Per Second > Higher Is Better m6a.4xlarge . 222 |============================================================ MariaDB mariadb-slap 11.5 Clients: 256 Queries Per Second > Higher Is Better m6a.4xlarge . 122 |============================================================ MariaDB mariadb-slap 11.5 Clients: 512 Queries Per Second > Higher Is Better m6a.4xlarge . 54 |============================================================= MariaDB mariadb-slap 11.5 Clients: 1024 Queries Per Second > Higher Is Better m6a.4xlarge . 7 |============================================================== MariaDB mariadb-slap 11.5 Clients: 2048 Queries Per Second > Higher Is Better m6a.4xlarge . 3 |============================================================== MariaDB mariadb-slap 11.5 Clients: 4096 Queries Per Second > Higher Is Better m6a.4xlarge . 1 |============================================================== MariaDB mariadb-slap 11.5 Clients: 8192 Queries Per Second > Higher Is Better m6a.4xlarge . 5 |============================================================== Memcached 1.6.19 Set To Get Ratio: 1:1 Ops/sec > Higher Is Better m6a.4xlarge . 1583073.49 |===================================================== Memcached 1.6.19 Set To Get Ratio: 1:5 Ops/sec > Higher Is Better m6a.4xlarge . 1271385.85 |===================================================== Memcached 1.6.19 Set To Get Ratio: 5:1 Ops/sec > Higher Is Better m6a.4xlarge . 1664430.41 |===================================================== Memcached 1.6.19 Set To Get Ratio: 1:10 Ops/sec > Higher Is Better m6a.4xlarge . 1234425.92 |===================================================== Memcached 1.6.19 Set To Get Ratio: 1:100 Ops/sec > Higher Is Better m6a.4xlarge . 1200307.13 |===================================================== nginx 1.23.2 Connections: 1 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better nginx 1.23.2 Connections: 20 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better m6a.4xlarge . 39019.89 |======================================================= nginx 1.23.2 Connections: 100 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better m6a.4xlarge . 50403.17 |======================================================= nginx 1.23.2 Connections: 200 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better m6a.4xlarge . 51406.82 |======================================================= nginx 1.23.2 Connections: 500 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better m6a.4xlarge . 50000.96 |======================================================= nginx 1.23.2 Connections: 1000 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better m6a.4xlarge . 48834.18 |======================================================= nginx 1.23.2 Connections: 4000 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better m6a.4xlarge . 46178.04 |======================================================= Node.js Express HTTP Load Test Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better Node.js V8 Web Tooling Benchmark runs/s > Higher Is Better m6a.4xlarge . 12.26 |========================================================== OpenSSL 3.3 Algorithm: SHA256 byte/s > Higher Is Better m6a.4xlarge . 11734985820 |==================================================== OpenSSL 3.3 Algorithm: SHA512 byte/s > Higher Is Better m6a.4xlarge . 3823033407 |===================================================== OpenSSL 3.3 Algorithm: RSA4096 sign/s > Higher Is Better m6a.4xlarge . 2078.9 |========================================================= OpenSSL 3.3 Algorithm: RSA4096 verify/s > Higher Is Better m6a.4xlarge . 135068.6 |======================================================= OpenSSL 3.3 Algorithm: ChaCha20 byte/s > Higher Is Better m6a.4xlarge . 35205042360 |==================================================== OpenSSL 3.3 Algorithm: AES-128-GCM byte/s > Higher Is Better m6a.4xlarge . 37528108963 |==================================================== OpenSSL 3.3 Algorithm: AES-256-GCM byte/s > Higher Is Better m6a.4xlarge . 34269435497 |==================================================== OpenSSL 3.3 Algorithm: ChaCha20-Poly1305 byte/s > Higher Is Better m6a.4xlarge . 23875757217 |==================================================== Perl Benchmarks Test: Pod2html Seconds < Lower Is Better m6a.4xlarge . 0.12144968 |===================================================== Perl Benchmarks Test: Interpreter Seconds < Lower Is Better m6a.4xlarge . 0.00160351 |===================================================== PHP Micro Benchmarks Test: Zend bench Seconds < Lower Is Better m6a.4xlarge . 0.326 |========================================================== PHP Micro Benchmarks Test: Zend micro_bench Seconds < Lower Is Better m6a.4xlarge . 1.640 |========================================================== PHPBench 0.8.1 PHP Benchmark Suite Score > Higher Is Better m6a.4xlarge . 695041 |========================================================= PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better m6a.4xlarge . 26508 |========================================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better m6a.4xlarge . 0.038 |========================================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better m6a.4xlarge . 880 |============================================================ PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better m6a.4xlarge . 1.136 |========================================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better m6a.4xlarge . 434147 |========================================================= PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better m6a.4xlarge . 0.115 |========================================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better m6a.4xlarge . 432865 |========================================================= PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better m6a.4xlarge . 0.231 |========================================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better m6a.4xlarge . 417117 |========================================================= PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better m6a.4xlarge . 0.600 |========================================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better m6a.4xlarge . 932 |============================================================ PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better m6a.4xlarge . 53.65 |========================================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better m6a.4xlarge . 311294 |========================================================= PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better m6a.4xlarge . 1.608 |========================================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 800 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better m6a.4xlarge . 254262 |========================================================= PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 800 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better m6a.4xlarge . 3.147 |========================================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better m6a.4xlarge . 25330 |========================================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better m6a.4xlarge . 0.039 |========================================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better m6a.4xlarge . 895 |============================================================ PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better m6a.4xlarge . 111.68 |========================================================= PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 1000 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better m6a.4xlarge . 243750 |========================================================= PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 1000 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better m6a.4xlarge . 4.104 |========================================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better m6a.4xlarge . 806 |============================================================ PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better m6a.4xlarge . 310.15 |========================================================= PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better m6a.4xlarge . 726 |============================================================ PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better m6a.4xlarge . 688.47 |========================================================= PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 5000 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 800 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better m6a.4xlarge . 577 |============================================================ PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 800 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better m6a.4xlarge . 1387.11 |======================================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better m6a.4xlarge . 844 |============================================================ PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better m6a.4xlarge . 1.185 |========================================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better m6a.4xlarge . 394403 |========================================================= PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better m6a.4xlarge . 0.127 |========================================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better m6a.4xlarge . 21127 |========================================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better m6a.4xlarge . 0.047 |========================================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 1000 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better m6a.4xlarge . 532 |============================================================ PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 1000 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better m6a.4xlarge . 1881.19 |======================================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 5000 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better m6a.4xlarge . 392083 |========================================================= PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better m6a.4xlarge . 0.255 |========================================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better m6a.4xlarge . 369678 |========================================================= PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better m6a.4xlarge . 0.676 |========================================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better m6a.4xlarge . 4680 |=========================================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better m6a.4xlarge . 10.68 |========================================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better m6a.4xlarge . 275370 |========================================================= PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better m6a.4xlarge . 1.816 |========================================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 800 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better m6a.4xlarge . 218722 |========================================================= PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 800 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better m6a.4xlarge . 3.659 |========================================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better m6a.4xlarge . 715 |============================================================ PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better m6a.4xlarge . 1.398 |========================================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better m6a.4xlarge . 304904 |========================================================= PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better m6a.4xlarge . 0.164 |========================================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better m6a.4xlarge . 1516 |=========================================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better m6a.4xlarge . 0.659 |========================================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 25000 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better m6a.4xlarge . 977 |============================================================ PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 25000 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better m6a.4xlarge . 1.023 |========================================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better m6a.4xlarge . 4776 |=========================================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better m6a.4xlarge . 20.94 |========================================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 1000 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better m6a.4xlarge . 217273 |========================================================= PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 1000 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better m6a.4xlarge . 4.603 |========================================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better m6a.4xlarge . 4546 |=========================================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better m6a.4xlarge . 55.00 |========================================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better m6a.4xlarge . 4374 |=========================================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better m6a.4xlarge . 114.32 |========================================================= PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 5000 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 800 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better m6a.4xlarge . 4430 |=========================================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 800 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better m6a.4xlarge . 180.60 |========================================================= PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better m6a.4xlarge . 324990 |========================================================= PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better m6a.4xlarge . 0.307 |========================================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better m6a.4xlarge . 287617 |========================================================= PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better m6a.4xlarge . 0.869 |========================================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better m6a.4xlarge . 2171 |=========================================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better m6a.4xlarge . 23.04 |========================================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better m6a.4xlarge . 227068 |========================================================= PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better m6a.4xlarge . 2.203 |========================================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 800 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better m6a.4xlarge . 182928 |========================================================= PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 800 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better m6a.4xlarge . 4.375 |========================================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better m6a.4xlarge . 526 |============================================================ PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better m6a.4xlarge . 1.902 |========================================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better m6a.4xlarge . 3272 |=========================================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better m6a.4xlarge . 15.28 |========================================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 25000 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better m6a.4xlarge . 427 |============================================================ PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 25000 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better m6a.4xlarge . 2.342 |========================================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 25000 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better m6a.4xlarge . 1987 |=========================================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 25000 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better m6a.4xlarge . 25.16 |========================================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 1000 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better m6a.4xlarge . 4409 |=========================================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 1000 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better m6a.4xlarge . 226.84 |========================================================= PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 5000 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better m6a.4xlarge . 3318 |=========================================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better m6a.4xlarge . 30.14 |========================================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 1000 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better m6a.4xlarge . 174333 |========================================================= PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 1000 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better m6a.4xlarge . 5.737 |========================================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better m6a.4xlarge . 3798 |=========================================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better m6a.4xlarge . 66.01 |========================================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better m6a.4xlarge . 4349 |=========================================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better m6a.4xlarge . 115.23 |========================================================= PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 5000 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 800 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better m6a.4xlarge . 4530 |=========================================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 800 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better m6a.4xlarge . 176.94 |========================================================= PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better m6a.4xlarge . 3362 |=========================================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better m6a.4xlarge . 29.74 |========================================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better m6a.4xlarge . 3514 |=========================================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better m6a.4xlarge . 71.15 |========================================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better m6a.4xlarge . 1956 |=========================================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better m6a.4xlarge . 25.56 |========================================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better m6a.4xlarge . 3521 |=========================================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better m6a.4xlarge . 141.99 |========================================================= PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 800 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better m6a.4xlarge . 3524 |=========================================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 800 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better m6a.4xlarge . 227.01 |========================================================= PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 25000 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better m6a.4xlarge . 2072 |=========================================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 25000 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better m6a.4xlarge . 48.26 |========================================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 25000 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better m6a.4xlarge . 2169 |=========================================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 25000 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better m6a.4xlarge . 115.25 |========================================================= PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 25000 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better m6a.4xlarge . 1456 |=========================================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 25000 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better m6a.4xlarge . 34.39 |========================================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 25000 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better m6a.4xlarge . 2171 |=========================================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 25000 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better m6a.4xlarge . 230.34 |========================================================= PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 25000 - Clients: 800 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better m6a.4xlarge . 2176 |=========================================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 25000 - Clients: 800 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better m6a.4xlarge . 367.66 |========================================================= PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 1000 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better m6a.4xlarge . 4527 |=========================================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 1000 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better m6a.4xlarge . 221.45 |========================================================= PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 5000 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better m6a.4xlarge . 2355 |=========================================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better m6a.4xlarge . 42.46 |========================================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 1000 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better m6a.4xlarge . 3526 |=========================================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 1000 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better m6a.4xlarge . 283.64 |========================================================= PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better m6a.4xlarge . 2650 |=========================================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better m6a.4xlarge . 94.34 |========================================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better m6a.4xlarge . 2806 |=========================================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better m6a.4xlarge . 178.18 |========================================================= PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 5000 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 800 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better m6a.4xlarge . 2938 |=========================================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 800 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better m6a.4xlarge . 272.34 |========================================================= PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 25000 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better m6a.4xlarge . 1657 |=========================================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 25000 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better m6a.4xlarge . 60.39 |========================================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 25000 - Clients: 1000 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better m6a.4xlarge . 2184 |=========================================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 25000 - Clients: 1000 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better m6a.4xlarge . 457.86 |========================================================= PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 25000 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better m6a.4xlarge . 1805 |=========================================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 25000 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better m6a.4xlarge . 138.69 |========================================================= PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 25000 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better m6a.4xlarge . 1886 |=========================================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 25000 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better m6a.4xlarge . 265.15 |========================================================= PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 25000 - Clients: 5000 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 25000 - Clients: 800 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better m6a.4xlarge . 1914 |=========================================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 25000 - Clients: 800 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better m6a.4xlarge . 418.07 |========================================================= PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 1000 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better m6a.4xlarge . 2916 |=========================================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 1000 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better m6a.4xlarge . 343.18 |========================================================= PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 5000 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 25000 - Clients: 1000 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better m6a.4xlarge . 1938 |=========================================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 25000 - Clients: 1000 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better m6a.4xlarge . 516.45 |========================================================= PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 25000 - Clients: 5000 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better Redis 7.0.12 + memtier_benchmark 2.0 Protocol: Redis - Clients: 50 - Set To Get Ratio: 1:1 Ops/sec > Higher Is Better m6a.4xlarge . 2142685.63 |===================================================== Redis 7.0.12 + memtier_benchmark 2.0 Protocol: Redis - Clients: 50 - Set To Get Ratio: 1:5 Ops/sec > Higher Is Better m6a.4xlarge . 2275734.36 |===================================================== Redis 7.0.12 + memtier_benchmark 2.0 Protocol: Redis - Clients: 50 - Set To Get Ratio: 5:1 Ops/sec > Higher Is Better m6a.4xlarge . 1942875.53 |===================================================== Redis 7.0.12 + memtier_benchmark 2.0 Protocol: Redis - Clients: 100 - Set To Get Ratio: 1:1 Ops/sec > Higher Is Better m6a.4xlarge . 1961603.22 |===================================================== Redis 7.0.12 + memtier_benchmark 2.0 Protocol: Redis - Clients: 100 - Set To Get Ratio: 1:5 Ops/sec > Higher Is Better m6a.4xlarge . 2095518.15 |===================================================== Redis 7.0.12 + memtier_benchmark 2.0 Protocol: Redis - Clients: 100 - Set To Get Ratio: 5:1 Ops/sec > Higher Is Better m6a.4xlarge . 1890904.12 |===================================================== Redis 7.0.12 + memtier_benchmark 2.0 Protocol: Redis - Clients: 50 - Set To Get Ratio: 10:1 Ops/sec > Higher Is Better m6a.4xlarge . 1875783.45 |===================================================== Redis 7.0.12 + memtier_benchmark 2.0 Protocol: Redis - Clients: 50 - Set To Get Ratio: 1:10 Ops/sec > Higher Is Better m6a.4xlarge . 2106789.30 |===================================================== Redis 7.0.12 + memtier_benchmark 2.0 Protocol: Redis - Clients: 500 - Set To Get Ratio: 1:1 Ops/sec > Higher Is Better m6a.4xlarge . 1773376.14 |===================================================== Redis 7.0.12 + memtier_benchmark 2.0 Protocol: Redis - Clients: 500 - Set To Get Ratio: 1:5 Ops/sec > Higher Is Better m6a.4xlarge . 1882839.29 |===================================================== Redis 7.0.12 + memtier_benchmark 2.0 Protocol: Redis - Clients: 500 - Set To Get Ratio: 5:1 Ops/sec > Higher Is Better m6a.4xlarge . 1663007.34 |===================================================== Redis 7.0.12 + memtier_benchmark 2.0 Protocol: Redis - Clients: 100 - Set To Get Ratio: 10:1 Ops/sec > Higher Is Better m6a.4xlarge . 1838326.57 |===================================================== Redis 7.0.12 + memtier_benchmark 2.0 Protocol: Redis - Clients: 100 - Set To Get Ratio: 1:10 Ops/sec > Higher Is Better m6a.4xlarge . 1960270.61 |===================================================== Redis 7.0.12 + memtier_benchmark 2.0 Protocol: Redis - Clients: 500 - Set To Get Ratio: 10:1 Ops/sec > Higher Is Better m6a.4xlarge . 1641838.12 |===================================================== Redis 7.0.12 + memtier_benchmark 2.0 Protocol: Redis - Clients: 500 - Set To Get Ratio: 1:10 Ops/sec > Higher Is Better m6a.4xlarge . 1862170.35 |===================================================== Redis 7.0.4 Test: GET - Parallel Connections: 50 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better m6a.4xlarge . 3024666.25 |===================================================== Redis 7.0.4 Test: SET - Parallel Connections: 50 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better m6a.4xlarge . 2122501.58 |===================================================== Redis 7.0.4 Test: GET - Parallel Connections: 500 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better m6a.4xlarge . 2602358.33 |===================================================== Redis 7.0.4 Test: LPOP - Parallel Connections: 50 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better m6a.4xlarge . 3052763.92 |===================================================== Redis 7.0.4 Test: SADD - Parallel Connections: 50 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better m6a.4xlarge . 2401666.25 |===================================================== Redis 7.0.4 Test: SET - Parallel Connections: 500 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better m6a.4xlarge . 2144806.50 |===================================================== Redis 7.0.4 Test: GET - Parallel Connections: 1000 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better m6a.4xlarge . 2582936.33 |===================================================== Redis 7.0.4 Test: LPOP - Parallel Connections: 500 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better m6a.4xlarge . 3080221.08 |===================================================== Redis 7.0.4 Test: LPUSH - Parallel Connections: 50 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better m6a.4xlarge . 1696129.96 |===================================================== Redis 7.0.4 Test: SADD - Parallel Connections: 500 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better m6a.4xlarge . 2365823.92 |===================================================== Redis 7.0.4 Test: SET - Parallel Connections: 1000 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better m6a.4xlarge . 2073596.79 |===================================================== Redis 7.0.4 Test: LPOP - Parallel Connections: 1000 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better m6a.4xlarge . 2697310.35 |===================================================== Redis 7.0.4 Test: LPUSH - Parallel Connections: 500 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better m6a.4xlarge . 1851511.37 |===================================================== Redis 7.0.4 Test: SADD - Parallel Connections: 1000 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better m6a.4xlarge . 2399878.50 |===================================================== Redis 7.0.4 Test: LPUSH - Parallel Connections: 1000 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better m6a.4xlarge . 1838338.75 |===================================================== RocksDB 9.0 Test: Overwrite Op/s > Higher Is Better m6a.4xlarge . 667014 |========================================================= RocksDB 9.0 Test: Random Fill Op/s > Higher Is Better m6a.4xlarge . 664311 |========================================================= RocksDB 9.0 Test: Random Read Op/s > Higher Is Better m6a.4xlarge . 41028686 |======================================================= RocksDB 9.0 Test: Update Random Op/s > Higher Is Better m6a.4xlarge . 359236 |========================================================= RocksDB 9.0 Test: Sequential Fill Op/s > Higher Is Better m6a.4xlarge . 996470 |========================================================= RocksDB 9.0 Test: Random Fill Sync Op/s > Higher Is Better m6a.4xlarge . 2964 |=========================================================== RocksDB 9.0 Test: Read While Writing Op/s > Higher Is Better m6a.4xlarge . 1584727 |======================================================== RocksDB 9.0 Test: Read Random Write Random Op/s > Higher Is Better m6a.4xlarge . 1281471 |======================================================== simdjson 2.0 Throughput Test: Kostya GB/s > Higher Is Better m6a.4xlarge . 2.85 |=========================================================== simdjson 2.0 Throughput Test: TopTweet GB/s > Higher Is Better m6a.4xlarge . 4.26 |=========================================================== simdjson 2.0 Throughput Test: LargeRandom GB/s > Higher Is Better m6a.4xlarge . 0.98 |=========================================================== simdjson 2.0 Throughput Test: PartialTweets GB/s > Higher Is Better m6a.4xlarge . 3.64 |=========================================================== simdjson 2.0 Throughput Test: DistinctUserID GB/s > Higher Is Better m6a.4xlarge . 4.20 |=========================================================== SQLite 3.30.1 Threads / Copies: 1 Seconds < Lower Is Better m6a.4xlarge . 35.78 |========================================================== SQLite 3.30.1 Threads / Copies: 8 Seconds < Lower Is Better m6a.4xlarge . 90.08 |========================================================== SQLite 3.30.1 Threads / Copies: 32 Seconds < Lower Is Better m6a.4xlarge . 331.06 |========================================================= SQLite 3.30.1 Threads / Copies: 64 Seconds < Lower Is Better m6a.4xlarge . 651.36 |========================================================= SQLite 3.30.1 Threads / Copies: 128 Seconds < Lower Is Better m6a.4xlarge . 1299.99 |======================================================== SQLite Speedtest 3.30 Timed Time - Size 1,000 Seconds < Lower Is Better m6a.4xlarge . 72.83 |========================================================== Timed Apache Compilation 2.4.41 Time To Compile Seconds < Lower Is Better m6a.4xlarge . 28.31 |========================================================== Timed CPython Compilation 3.10.6 Build Configuration: Default Seconds < Lower Is Better m6a.4xlarge . 28.93 |========================================================== Timed CPython Compilation 3.10.6 Build Configuration: Released Build, PGO + LTO Optimized Seconds < Lower Is Better m6a.4xlarge . 342.85 |========================================================= Timed Eigen Compilation 3.3.9 Time To Compile Seconds < Lower Is Better m6a.4xlarge . 106.74 |========================================================= Timed Erlang/OTP Compilation 25.0 Time To Compile Seconds < Lower Is Better m6a.4xlarge . 116.84 |========================================================= Timed FFmpeg Compilation 7.0 Seconds < Lower Is Better Timed GCC Compilation 13.2 Seconds < Lower Is Better Timed GDB GNU Debugger Compilation 10.2 Time To Compile Seconds < Lower Is Better m6a.4xlarge . 88.28 |========================================================== Timed Gem5 Compilation 23.0.1 Time To Compile Seconds < Lower Is Better m6a.4xlarge . 744.29 |========================================================= Timed Godot Game Engine Compilation 4.0 Time To Compile Seconds < Lower Is Better m6a.4xlarge . 568.26 |========================================================= Timed ImageMagick Compilation 6.9.0 Time To Compile Seconds < Lower Is Better m6a.4xlarge . 37.27 |========================================================== Timed Linux Kernel Compilation 6.8 Build: defconfig Seconds < Lower Is Better Timed Linux Kernel Compilation 6.8 Build: allmodconfig Seconds < Lower Is Better Timed LLVM Compilation 16.0 Build System: Ninja Seconds < Lower Is Better m6a.4xlarge . 1120.77 |======================================================== Timed LLVM Compilation 16.0 Build System: Unix Makefiles Seconds < Lower Is Better m6a.4xlarge . 1163.36 |======================================================== Timed Mesa Compilation 24.0 Seconds < Lower Is Better Timed MPlayer Compilation 1.5 Seconds < Lower Is Better Timed Node.js Compilation 21.7.2 Time To Compile Seconds < Lower Is Better m6a.4xlarge . 1365.83 |======================================================== Timed PHP Compilation 8.3.4 Seconds < Lower Is Better Timed Wasmer Compilation 2.3 Time To Compile Seconds < Lower Is Better m6a.4xlarge . 64.34 |==========================================================