Nvidia 2 x Intel Xeon Gold 6226R testing with a (5.14 BIOS) and ASPEED 16GB on Ubuntu 24.04 via the Phoronix Test Suite. ASPEED - 2 x Intel Xeon Gold 6226R: Processor: 2 x Intel Xeon Gold 6226R @ 3.90GHz (32 Cores / 64 Threads), Motherboard: (5.14 BIOS), Chipset: Intel Sky Lake-E DMI3 Registers, Memory: 512GB, Disk: 2 x 8002GB INTEL SSDPE2KX080T8, Graphics: ASPEED 16GB, Audio: NVIDIA GA104 HD Audio, Monitor: 27B2G5, Network: 2 x Intel X722 for 1GbE + 2 x Broadcom BCM57414 NetXtreme-E 10Gb/25Gb OS: Ubuntu 24.04, Kernel: 6.8.0-38-generic (x86_64), Display Server: X Server, Display Driver: NVIDIA, OpenCL: OpenCL 3.0 CUDA 12.4.131, Compiler: GCC 13.2.0 + CUDA 12.4, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 1920x1080 SHOC Scalable HeterOgeneous Computing 2020-04-17 Target: OpenCL - Benchmark: Max SP Flops GFLOPS > Higher Is Better ASPEED - 2 x Intel Xeon Gold 6226R . 21619.9 |================================= NCNN 20230517 Target: Vulkan GPU - Model: FastestDet ms < Lower Is Better ASPEED - 2 x Intel Xeon Gold 6226R . 10.39 |=================================== NCNN 20230517 Target: Vulkan GPU - Model: vision_transformer ms < Lower Is Better ASPEED - 2 x Intel Xeon Gold 6226R . 58.46 |=================================== NCNN 20230517 Target: Vulkan GPU - Model: regnety_400m ms < Lower Is Better ASPEED - 2 x Intel Xeon Gold 6226R . 32.77 |=================================== NCNN 20230517 Target: Vulkan GPU - Model: squeezenet_ssd ms < Lower Is Better ASPEED - 2 x Intel Xeon Gold 6226R . 20.32 |=================================== NCNN 20230517 Target: Vulkan GPU - Model: yolov4-tiny ms < Lower Is Better ASPEED - 2 x Intel Xeon Gold 6226R . 33.43 |=================================== NCNN 20230517 Target: Vulkan GPU - Model: resnet50 ms < Lower Is Better ASPEED - 2 x Intel Xeon Gold 6226R . 21.90 |=================================== NCNN 20230517 Target: Vulkan GPU - Model: alexnet ms < Lower Is Better ASPEED - 2 x Intel Xeon Gold 6226R . 7.97 |==================================== NCNN 20230517 Target: Vulkan GPU - Model: resnet18 ms < Lower Is Better ASPEED - 2 x Intel Xeon Gold 6226R . 10.92 |=================================== NCNN 20230517 Target: Vulkan GPU - Model: vgg16 ms < Lower Is Better ASPEED - 2 x Intel Xeon Gold 6226R . 45.73 |=================================== NCNN 20230517 Target: Vulkan GPU - Model: googlenet ms < Lower Is Better ASPEED - 2 x Intel Xeon Gold 6226R . 18.15 |=================================== NCNN 20230517 Target: Vulkan GPU - Model: blazeface ms < Lower Is Better ASPEED - 2 x Intel Xeon Gold 6226R . 4.13 |==================================== NCNN 20230517 Target: Vulkan GPU - Model: efficientnet-b0 ms < Lower Is Better ASPEED - 2 x Intel Xeon Gold 6226R . 11.02 |=================================== NCNN 20230517 Target: Vulkan GPU - Model: mnasnet ms < Lower Is Better ASPEED - 2 x Intel Xeon Gold 6226R . 7.30 |==================================== NCNN 20230517 Target: Vulkan GPU - Model: shufflenet-v2 ms < Lower Is Better ASPEED - 2 x Intel Xeon Gold 6226R . 9.72 |==================================== NCNN 20230517 Target: Vulkan GPU-v3-v3 - Model: mobilenet-v3 ms < Lower Is Better ASPEED - 2 x Intel Xeon Gold 6226R . 8.52 |==================================== NCNN 20230517 Target: Vulkan GPU-v2-v2 - Model: mobilenet-v2 ms < Lower Is Better ASPEED - 2 x Intel Xeon Gold 6226R . 8.37 |==================================== NCNN 20230517 Target: Vulkan GPU - Model: mobilenet ms < Lower Is Better ASPEED - 2 x Intel Xeon Gold 6226R . 18.93 |=================================== LuxCoreRender 2.6 Scene: DLSC - Acceleration: GPU M samples/sec > Higher Is Better ASPEED - 2 x Intel Xeon Gold 6226R . 57.44 |=================================== NeatBench 5 Acceleration: GPU FPS > Higher Is Better LuxCoreRender 2.6 Scene: LuxCore Benchmark - Acceleration: GPU M samples/sec > Higher Is Better ASPEED - 2 x Intel Xeon Gold 6226R . 26.70 |=================================== FAHBench 2.3.2 Ns Per Day > Higher Is Better ASPEED - 2 x Intel Xeon Gold 6226R . 240.14 |================================== ViennaCL 1.7.1 Test: CPU BLAS - dGEMM-TT GFLOPs/s > Higher Is Better ASPEED - 2 x Intel Xeon Gold 6226R . 58.3 |==================================== ViennaCL 1.7.1 Test: CPU BLAS - dGEMM-TN GFLOPs/s > Higher Is Better ASPEED - 2 x Intel Xeon Gold 6226R . 62.2 |==================================== ViennaCL 1.7.1 Test: CPU BLAS - dGEMM-NT GFLOPs/s > Higher Is Better ASPEED - 2 x Intel Xeon Gold 6226R . 59.4 |==================================== ViennaCL 1.7.1 Test: CPU BLAS - dGEMM-NN GFLOPs/s > Higher Is Better ASPEED - 2 x Intel Xeon Gold 6226R . 59.7 |==================================== ViennaCL 1.7.1 Test: CPU BLAS - dGEMV-T GB/s > Higher Is Better ASPEED - 2 x Intel Xeon Gold 6226R . 196 |===================================== ViennaCL 1.7.1 Test: CPU BLAS - dGEMV-N GB/s > Higher Is Better ASPEED - 2 x Intel Xeon Gold 6226R . 108 |===================================== ViennaCL 1.7.1 Test: CPU BLAS - dDOT GB/s > Higher Is Better ASPEED - 2 x Intel Xeon Gold 6226R . 175 |===================================== ViennaCL 1.7.1 Test: CPU BLAS - dAXPY GB/s > Higher Is Better ASPEED - 2 x Intel Xeon Gold 6226R . 183 |===================================== ViennaCL 1.7.1 Test: CPU BLAS - dCOPY GB/s > Higher Is Better ASPEED - 2 x Intel Xeon Gold 6226R . 117.9 |=================================== ViennaCL 1.7.1 Test: CPU BLAS - sDOT GB/s > Higher Is Better ASPEED - 2 x Intel Xeon Gold 6226R . 261 |===================================== ViennaCL 1.7.1 Test: CPU BLAS - sAXPY GB/s > Higher Is Better ASPEED - 2 x Intel Xeon Gold 6226R . 382 |===================================== ViennaCL 1.7.1 Test: CPU BLAS - sCOPY GB/s > Higher Is Better ASPEED - 2 x Intel Xeon Gold 6226R . 228 |===================================== LuxCoreRender 2.6 Scene: Orange Juice - Acceleration: GPU M samples/sec > Higher Is Better ASPEED - 2 x Intel Xeon Gold 6226R . 50.64 |=================================== Hashcat 6.2.4 Benchmark: MD5 H/s > Higher Is Better ASPEED - 2 x Intel Xeon Gold 6226R . 156178112500 |============================ PlaidML FP16: No - Mode: Inference - Network: DenseNet 201 - Device: OpenCL FPS > Higher Is Better ASPEED - 2 x Intel Xeon Gold 6226R . 179.21 |================================== LuxCoreRender 2.6 Scene: Danish Mood - Acceleration: GPU M samples/sec > Higher Is Better ASPEED - 2 x Intel Xeon Gold 6226R . 35.82 |=================================== PlaidML FP16: No - Mode: Training - Network: Mobilenet - Device: OpenCL Examples Per Second > Higher Is Better ViennaCL 1.7.1 Test: OpenCL BLAS - dGEMM-TT GFLOPs/s > Higher Is Better ASPEED - 2 x Intel Xeon Gold 6226R . 340 |===================================== ViennaCL 1.7.1 Test: OpenCL BLAS - dGEMM-NT GFLOPs/s > Higher Is Better ASPEED - 2 x Intel Xeon Gold 6226R . 348 |===================================== ViennaCL 1.7.1 Test: OpenCL BLAS - dGEMM-NN GFLOPs/s > Higher Is Better ASPEED - 2 x Intel Xeon Gold 6226R . 344 |===================================== ViennaCL 1.7.1 Test: OpenCL BLAS - dGEMV-T GB/s > Higher Is Better ASPEED - 2 x Intel Xeon Gold 6226R . 317 |===================================== ViennaCL 1.7.1 Test: OpenCL BLAS - dGEMV-N GB/s > Higher Is Better ASPEED - 2 x Intel Xeon Gold 6226R . 170 |===================================== ViennaCL 1.7.1 Test: OpenCL BLAS - dDOT GB/s > Higher Is Better ASPEED - 2 x Intel Xeon Gold 6226R . 383 |===================================== ViennaCL 1.7.1 Test: OpenCL BLAS - dAXPY GB/s > Higher Is Better ASPEED - 2 x Intel Xeon Gold 6226R . 385 |===================================== ViennaCL 1.7.1 Test: OpenCL BLAS - dCOPY GB/s > Higher Is Better ASPEED - 2 x Intel Xeon Gold 6226R . 359 |===================================== ViennaCL 1.7.1 Test: OpenCL BLAS - sDOT GB/s > Higher Is Better ASPEED - 2 x Intel Xeon Gold 6226R . 312 |===================================== ViennaCL 1.7.1 Test: OpenCL BLAS - sAXPY GB/s > Higher Is Better ASPEED - 2 x Intel Xeon Gold 6226R . 345 |===================================== ViennaCL 1.7.1 Test: OpenCL BLAS - sCOPY GB/s > Higher Is Better ASPEED - 2 x Intel Xeon Gold 6226R . 266 |===================================== Hashcat 6.2.4 Benchmark: SHA-512 H/s > Higher Is Better ASPEED - 2 x Intel Xeon Gold 6226R . 13308000000 |============================= Hashcat 6.2.4 Benchmark: SHA1 H/s > Higher Is Better ASPEED - 2 x Intel Xeon Gold 6226R . 91940033333 |============================= Hashcat 6.2.4 Benchmark: 7-Zip H/s > Higher Is Better ASPEED - 2 x Intel Xeon Gold 6226R . 4224700 |================================= Hashcat 6.2.4 Benchmark: TrueCrypt RIPEMD160 + XTS H/s > Higher Is Better ASPEED - 2 x Intel Xeon Gold 6226R . 3454200 |================================= PlaidML FP16: No - Mode: Inference - Network: IMDB LSTM - Device: OpenCL FPS > Higher Is Better ASPEED - 2 x Intel Xeon Gold 6226R . 751.93 |================================== SHOC Scalable HeterOgeneous Computing 2020-04-17 Target: OpenCL - Benchmark: Texture Read Bandwidth GB/s > Higher Is Better ASPEED - 2 x Intel Xeon Gold 6226R . 1998.58 |================================= PlaidML FP16: Yes - Mode: Inference - Network: Mobilenet - Device: OpenCL FPS > Higher Is Better ASPEED - 2 x Intel Xeon Gold 6226R . 2201.61 |================================= PlaidML FP16: No - Mode: Inference - Network: Mobilenet - Device: OpenCL FPS > Higher Is Better ASPEED - 2 x Intel Xeon Gold 6226R . 1898.70 |================================= clpeak 1.1.2 OpenCL Test: Double-Precision Double GFLOPS > Higher Is Better ASPEED - 2 x Intel Xeon Gold 6226R . 365.83 |================================== Rodinia 3.1 Test: OpenCL Particle Filter Seconds < Lower Is Better ASPEED - 2 x Intel Xeon Gold 6226R . 7.105 |=================================== LuxCoreRender 2.6 Scene: Rainbow Colors and Prism - Acceleration: GPU M samples/sec > Higher Is Better ASPEED - 2 x Intel Xeon Gold 6226R . 122.06 |================================== clpeak 1.1.2 OpenCL Test: Global Memory Bandwidth GBPS > Higher Is Better ASPEED - 2 x Intel Xeon Gold 6226R . 377.04 |================================== SHOC Scalable HeterOgeneous Computing 2020-04-17 Target: OpenCL - Benchmark: GEMM SGEMM_N GFLOPS > Higher Is Better ASPEED - 2 x Intel Xeon Gold 6226R . 3630.55 |================================= SHOC Scalable HeterOgeneous Computing 2020-04-17 Target: OpenCL - Benchmark: S3D GFLOPS > Higher Is Better ASPEED - 2 x Intel Xeon Gold 6226R . 211.90 |================================== cl-mem 2017-01-13 Benchmark: Copy GB/s > Higher Is Better ASPEED - 2 x Intel Xeon Gold 6226R . 283.4 |=================================== cl-mem 2017-01-13 Benchmark: Write GB/s > Higher Is Better ASPEED - 2 x Intel Xeon Gold 6226R . 376.4 |=================================== cl-mem 2017-01-13 Benchmark: Read GB/s > Higher Is Better ASPEED - 2 x Intel Xeon Gold 6226R . 380.1 |=================================== Mixbench 2020-06-23 Backend: OpenCL - Benchmark: Integer GIOPS > Higher Is Better ASPEED - 2 x Intel Xeon Gold 6226R . 11601.09 |================================ SHOC Scalable HeterOgeneous Computing 2020-04-17 Target: OpenCL - Benchmark: FFT SP GFLOPS > Higher Is Better ASPEED - 2 x Intel Xeon Gold 6226R . 1094.66 |================================= SHOC Scalable HeterOgeneous Computing 2020-04-17 Target: OpenCL - Benchmark: Triad GB/s > Higher Is Better ASPEED - 2 x Intel Xeon Gold 6226R . 12.12 |=================================== clpeak 1.1.2 OpenCL Test: Integer Compute INT GIOPS > Higher Is Better ASPEED - 2 x Intel Xeon Gold 6226R . 9617.49 |================================= SHOC Scalable HeterOgeneous Computing 2020-04-17 Target: OpenCL - Benchmark: Bus Speed Readback GB/s > Higher Is Better ASPEED - 2 x Intel Xeon Gold 6226R . 13.15 |=================================== SHOC Scalable HeterOgeneous Computing 2020-04-17 Target: OpenCL - Benchmark: Reduction GB/s > Higher Is Better ASPEED - 2 x Intel Xeon Gold 6226R . 324.18 |================================== clpeak 1.1.2 OpenCL Test: Single-Precision Float GFLOPS > Higher Is Better ASPEED - 2 x Intel Xeon Gold 6226R . 18602.65 |================================ SHOC Scalable HeterOgeneous Computing 2020-04-17 Target: OpenCL - Benchmark: Bus Speed Download GB/s > Higher Is Better ASPEED - 2 x Intel Xeon Gold 6226R . 12.33 |=================================== Mixbench 2020-06-23 Backend: OpenCL - Benchmark: Single Precision GFLOPS > Higher Is Better ASPEED - 2 x Intel Xeon Gold 6226R . 18670.28 |================================ FinanceBench 2016-07-25 Benchmark: Black-Scholes OpenCL ms < Lower Is Better ASPEED - 2 x Intel Xeon Gold 6226R . 10.46 |=================================== SHOC Scalable HeterOgeneous Computing 2020-04-17 Target: OpenCL - Benchmark: MD5 Hash GHash/s > Higher Is Better ASPEED - 2 x Intel Xeon Gold 6226R . 22.57 |=================================== MandelGPU 1.3pts1 OpenCL Device: GPU Samples/sec > Higher Is Better Mixbench 2020-06-23 Backend: OpenCL - Benchmark: Double Precision GFLOPS > Higher Is Better ASPEED - 2 x Intel Xeon Gold 6226R . 309.39 |================================== ArrayFire 3.9 Test: Conjugate Gradient OpenCL LeelaChessZero 0.30 Backend: OpenCL Nodes Per Second > Higher Is Better RedShift Demo 3.0 Seconds < Lower Is Better