a AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D 16-Core testing with a ASUS TUF GAMING X670E-PLUS WIFI (2613 BIOS) and ASUS NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Lite Hash Rate 12GB on Ubuntu 22.04 via the Phoronix Test Suite. AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D 16-Core: Processor: AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D 16-Core @ 5.76GHz (16 Cores / 32 Threads), Motherboard: ASUS TUF GAMING X670E-PLUS WIFI (2613 BIOS), Chipset: AMD Device 14d8, Memory: 128GB, Disk: 2 x 1000GB Samsung SSD 990 PRO 1TB, Graphics: ASUS NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Lite Hash Rate 12GB, Audio: NVIDIA Device 228e, Monitor: LS32A80, Network: Realtek RTL8125 2.5GbE + MEDIATEK Device 0616 OS: Ubuntu 22.04, Kernel: 6.5.0-44-generic (x86_64), Desktop: GNOME Shell 42.9, Display Server: X Server 1.21.1.4, Display Driver: NVIDIA, OpenGL: 4.6 Mesa 23.2.1-1ubuntu3.1~22.04.2 (LLVM 15.0.7 DRM 3.54), OpenCL: OpenCL 3.0 CUDA 12.2.148, Vulkan: 1.3.255, Compiler: GCC 11.4.0, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 3840x2160 HPC Challenge 1.5.0 Test / Class: G-HPL GFLOPS > Higher Is Better AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D 16-Core . 130.17 |========================================= Xcompact3d Incompact3d 2021-03-11 Input: X3D-benchmarking input.i3d Seconds < Lower Is Better AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D 16-Core . 2081.52 |======================================== CloverLeaf 1.3 Input: clover_bm16 Seconds < Lower Is Better AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D 16-Core . 1885.97 |======================================== NWChem 7.0.2 Input: C240 Buckyball Seconds < Lower Is Better AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D 16-Core . 4300.8 |========================================= Monte Carlo Simulations of Ionised Nebulae 2.02.73.3 Input: Dust 2D tau100.0 Seconds < Lower Is Better AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D 16-Core . 148.19 |========================================= FFTW 3.3.6 Build: Stock - Size: 2D FFT Size 4096 Mflops > Higher Is Better AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D 16-Core . 8414.9 |========================================= FFTW 3.3.6 Build: Float + SSE - Size: 2D FFT Size 4096 Mflops > Higher Is Better AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D 16-Core . 29659 |========================================== LAMMPS Molecular Dynamics Simulator 23Jun2022 Model: 20k Atoms ns/day > Higher Is Better AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D 16-Core . 16.48 |========================================== Quantum ESPRESSO 7.0 Input: AUSURF112 Seconds < Lower Is Better AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D 16-Core . 364.75 |========================================= Himeno Benchmark 3.0 Poisson Pressure Solver MFLOPS > Higher Is Better AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D 16-Core . 5417.59 |======================================== CloverLeaf 1.3 Input: clover_bm64_short Seconds < Lower Is Better AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D 16-Core . 222.23 |========================================= QMCPACK 3.17.1 Input: Li2_STO_ae Total Execution Time - Seconds < Lower Is Better AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D 16-Core . 132.28 |========================================= QMCPACK 3.17.1 Input: O_ae_pyscf_UHF Total Execution Time - Seconds < Lower Is Better AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D 16-Core . 126.00 |========================================= QMCPACK 3.17.1 Input: FeCO6_b3lyp_gms Total Execution Time - Seconds < Lower Is Better AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D 16-Core . 122.01 |========================================= Timed HMMer Search 3.3.2 Pfam Database Search Seconds < Lower Is Better AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D 16-Core . 87.85 |========================================== Xcompact3d Incompact3d 2021-03-11 Input: input.i3d 193 Cells Per Direction Seconds < Lower Is Better AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D 16-Core . 85.02 |========================================== Kripke 1.2.6 Throughput FoM > Higher Is Better AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D 16-Core . 97022713 |======================================= NAMD 3.0b6 Input: STMV with 1,066,628 Atoms ns/day > Higher Is Better AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D 16-Core . 0.67892 |======================================== miniFE 2.2 Problem Size: Medium CG Mflops > Higher Is Better GROMACS 2024 Implementation: MPI CPU - Input: water_GMX50_bare Ns Per Day > Higher Is Better AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D 16-Core . 2.379 |========================================== QMCPACK 3.17.1 Input: LiH_ae_MSD Total Execution Time - Seconds < Lower Is Better AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D 16-Core . 71.62 |========================================== Timed MrBayes Analysis 3.2.7 Primate Phylogeny Analysis Seconds < Lower Is Better AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D 16-Core . 69.52 |========================================== Dolfyn 0.527 Computational Fluid Dynamics Seconds < Lower Is Better AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D 16-Core . 10.97 |========================================== miniFE 2.2 Problem Size: Small CG Mflops > Higher Is Better AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D 16-Core . 6220.51 |======================================== CloverLeaf 1.3 Input: clover_bm Seconds < Lower Is Better AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D 16-Core . 39.02 |========================================== Pennant 1.0.1 Test: sedovbig Hydro Cycle Time - Seconds < Lower Is Better AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D 16-Core . 36.84 |========================================== NAMD 3.0b6 Input: ATPase with 327,506 Atoms ns/day > Higher Is Better AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D 16-Core . 2.55860 |======================================== Algebraic Multi-Grid Benchmark 1.2 Figure Of Merit > Higher Is Better AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D 16-Core . 299331033 |====================================== ACES DGEMM 1.0 Sustained Floating-Point Rate GFLOP/s > Higher Is Better AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D 16-Core . 11.17 |========================================== FFTW 3.3.6 Build: Float + SSE - Size: 1D FFT Size 4096 Mflops > Higher Is Better AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D 16-Core . 82158 |========================================== Pennant 1.0.1 Test: leblancbig Hydro Cycle Time - Seconds < Lower Is Better AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D 16-Core . 22.74 |========================================== QMCPACK 3.17.1 Input: simple-H2O Total Execution Time - Seconds < Lower Is Better AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D 16-Core . 17.51 |========================================== Xcompact3d Incompact3d 2021-03-11 Input: input.i3d 129 Cells Per Direction Seconds < Lower Is Better AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D 16-Core . 17.30 |========================================== FFTW 3.3.6 Build: Stock - Size: 2D FFT Size 32 Mflops > Higher Is Better AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D 16-Core . 14434 |========================================== FFTW 3.3.6 Build: Float + SSE - Size: 2D FFT Size 32 Mflops > Higher Is Better AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D 16-Core . 68895 |========================================== QMCPACK 3.17.1 Input: H4_ae Total Execution Time - Seconds < Lower Is Better AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D 16-Core . 11.66 |========================================== Monte Carlo Simulations of Ionised Nebulae 2.02.73.3 Input: Gas HII40 Seconds < Lower Is Better AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D 16-Core . 10.33 |========================================== LULESH 2.0.3 z/s > Higher Is Better AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D 16-Core . 6885.89 |======================================== Timed MAFFT Alignment 7.471 Multiple Sequence Alignment - LSU RNA Seconds < Lower Is Better AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D 16-Core . 6.681 |========================================== FFTW 3.3.6 Build: Stock - Size: 1D FFT Size 4096 Mflops > Higher Is Better AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D 16-Core . 11866 |========================================== FFTW 3.3.6 Build: Float + SSE - Size: 1D FFT Size 32 Mflops > Higher Is Better AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D 16-Core . 23851 |========================================== FFTW 3.3.6 Build: Stock - Size: 1D FFT Size 32 Mflops > Higher Is Better AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D 16-Core . 13371 |========================================== FFTE 7.0 Test: N=256, 1D Complex FFT Routine MFLOPS > Higher Is Better AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D 16-Core . 83160.78 |======================================= LAMMPS Molecular Dynamics Simulator 23Jun2022 Model: Rhodopsin Protein ns/day > Higher Is Better AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D 16-Core . 16.03 |========================================== miniFE 2.2 Problem Size: Large CG Mflops > Higher Is Better GPAW 23.6 Input: Carbon Nanotube Seconds < Lower Is Better OpenFOAM 10 Input: drivaerFastback, Medium Mesh Size Seconds < Lower Is Better OpenFOAM 10 Input: drivaerFastback, Small Mesh Size Seconds < Lower Is Better OpenFOAM 10 Input: drivaerFastback, Large Mesh Size Seconds < Lower Is Better OpenFOAM 10 Input: motorBike Seconds < Lower Is Better CP2K Molecular Dynamics 2023.1 Input: Fayalite-FIST Seconds < Lower Is Better CP2K Molecular Dynamics 2023.1 Input: H2O-DFT-LS Seconds < Lower Is Better CP2K Molecular Dynamics 2023.1 Input: H20-64 Seconds < Lower Is Better ArrayFire 3.9 Test: BLAS CPU GROMACS 2024 Implementation: NVIDIA CUDA GPU - Input: water_GMX50_bare Ns Per Day > Higher Is Better GNU Octave Benchmark Seconds < Lower Is Better Nebular Empirical Analysis Tool 2.3 Seconds < Lower Is Better