results Intel Xeon E3-1275 v6 testing with a ASUS P10S-C (4503 BIOS) and ASPEED on Ubuntu 24.04 via the Phoronix Test Suite. 2 x 1000GB Samsung SSD 980 1TB: Processor: Intel Core i3-7100 @ 3.90GHz (2 Cores / 4 Threads), Motherboard: ASUS P10S-C (4503 BIOS), Chipset: Intel Xeon E3-1200 v6/7th, Memory: 2 x 8 GB DDR4-2133MT/s W-MEM21E4D88GHL, Disk: 2 x 1000GB Samsung SSD 980 1TB, Graphics: ASPEED, Network: 4 x Intel I210 OS: Ubuntu 24.04, Kernel: 6.8.0-35-generic (x86_64), Compiler: GCC 13.2.0, File-System: btrfs, Screen Resolution: 1024x768 i3-7100 btrfs 16GB: Processor: Intel Core i3-7100 @ 3.90GHz (2 Cores / 4 Threads), Motherboard: ASUS P10S-C (4503 BIOS), Chipset: Intel Xeon E3-1200 v6/7th, Memory: 2 x 8 GB DDR4-2133MT/s W-MEM21E4D88GHL, Disk: 2 x 1000GB Samsung SSD 980 1TB, Graphics: ASPEED, Network: 4 x Intel I210 OS: Ubuntu 24.04, Kernel: 6.8.0-35-generic (x86_64), Compiler: GCC 13.2.0, File-System: btrfs, Screen Resolution: 1024x768 E3-1200 btrfs 64GB: Processor: Intel Xeon E3-1275 v6 @ 4.20GHz (4 Cores / 8 Threads), Motherboard: ASUS P10S-C (4503 BIOS), Chipset: Intel Xeon E3-1200 v6/7th, Memory: 4 x 16 GB DDR4-2400MT/s HMA82GU7CJR8N-VK, Disk: 2 x 1000GB Samsung SSD 980 1TB, Graphics: ASPEED, Network: 4 x Intel I210 OS: Ubuntu 24.04, Kernel: 6.8.0-35-generic (x86_64), Compiler: GCC 13.2.0, File-System: btrfs, Screen Resolution: 1024x768 PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 25000 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better Apache Spark TPC-DS 3.5 Scale Factor: 10 - Q79 Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x 1000GB Samsung SSD 980 1TB . 11.19 |======================================= Apache Spark TPC-DS 3.5 Scale Factor: 10 - Q34 Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x 1000GB Samsung SSD 980 1TB . 10.84 |======================================= Apache Spark TPC-DS 3.5 Scale Factor: 10 - Q13 Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x 1000GB Samsung SSD 980 1TB . 10.66 |======================================= Apache Spark TPC-DS 3.5 Scale Factor: 10 - Q99 Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x 1000GB Samsung SSD 980 1TB . 8.64 |======================================== Apache Spark TPC-DS 3.5 Scale Factor: 10 - Q98 Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x 1000GB Samsung SSD 980 1TB . 4.00 |======================================== Apache Spark TPC-DS 3.5 Scale Factor: 10 - Q97 Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x 1000GB Samsung SSD 980 1TB . 16.93 |======================================= Apache Spark TPC-DS 3.5 Scale Factor: 10 - Q96 Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x 1000GB Samsung SSD 980 1TB . 6.11 |======================================== Apache Spark TPC-DS 3.5 Scale Factor: 10 - Q95 Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x 1000GB Samsung SSD 980 1TB . 8.69 |======================================== Apache Spark TPC-DS 3.5 Scale Factor: 10 - Q94 Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x 1000GB Samsung SSD 980 1TB . 8.60 |======================================== Apache Spark TPC-DS 3.5 Scale Factor: 10 - Q93 Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x 1000GB Samsung SSD 980 1TB . 27.93 |======================================= Apache Spark TPC-DS 3.5 Scale Factor: 10 - Q92 Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x 1000GB Samsung SSD 980 1TB . 7.10 |======================================== Apache Spark TPC-DS 3.5 Scale Factor: 10 - Q91 Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x 1000GB Samsung SSD 980 1TB . 7.44 |======================================== Apache Spark TPC-DS 3.5 Scale Factor: 10 - Q90 Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x 1000GB Samsung SSD 980 1TB . 6.15 |======================================== Apache Spark TPC-DS 3.5 Scale Factor: 10 - Q89 Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x 1000GB Samsung SSD 980 1TB . 10.34 |======================================= Apache Spark TPC-DS 3.5 Scale Factor: 10 - Q88 Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x 1000GB Samsung SSD 980 1TB . 18.34 |======================================= Apache Spark TPC-DS 3.5 Scale Factor: 10 - Q87 Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x 1000GB Samsung SSD 980 1TB . 16.04 |======================================= Apache Spark TPC-DS 3.5 Scale Factor: 10 - Q86 Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x 1000GB Samsung SSD 980 1TB . 7.56 |======================================== Apache Spark TPC-DS 3.5 Scale Factor: 10 - Q85 Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x 1000GB Samsung SSD 980 1TB . 12.15 |======================================= Apache Spark TPC-DS 3.5 Scale Factor: 10 - Q84 Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x 1000GB Samsung SSD 980 1TB . 7.32 |======================================== Apache Spark TPC-DS 3.5 Scale Factor: 10 - Q83 Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x 1000GB Samsung SSD 980 1TB . 8.53 |======================================== Apache Spark TPC-DS 3.5 Scale Factor: 10 - Q82 Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x 1000GB Samsung SSD 980 1TB . 18.24 |======================================= Apache Spark TPC-DS 3.5 Scale Factor: 10 - Q81 Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x 1000GB Samsung SSD 980 1TB . 8.96 |======================================== Apache Spark TPC-DS 3.5 Scale Factor: 10 - Q80 Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x 1000GB Samsung SSD 980 1TB . 52.33 |======================================= Apache Spark TPC-DS 3.5 Scale Factor: 10 - Q78 Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x 1000GB Samsung SSD 980 1TB . 47.76 |======================================= Apache Spark TPC-DS 3.5 Scale Factor: 10 - Q77 Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x 1000GB Samsung SSD 980 1TB . 13.27 |======================================= Apache Spark TPC-DS 3.5 Scale Factor: 10 - Q76 Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x 1000GB Samsung SSD 980 1TB . 10.53 |======================================= Apache Spark TPC-DS 3.5 Scale Factor: 10 - Q75 Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x 1000GB Samsung SSD 980 1TB . 26.76 |======================================= Apache Spark TPC-DS 3.5 Scale Factor: 10 - Q74 Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x 1000GB Samsung SSD 980 1TB . 20.28 |======================================= Apache Spark TPC-DS 3.5 Scale Factor: 10 - Q73 Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x 1000GB Samsung SSD 980 1TB . 10.12 |======================================= Apache Spark TPC-DS 3.5 Scale Factor: 10 - Q72 Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x 1000GB Samsung SSD 980 1TB . 129.05 |====================================== Apache Spark TPC-DS 3.5 Scale Factor: 10 - Q71 Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x 1000GB Samsung SSD 980 1TB . 11.50 |======================================= Apache Spark TPC-DS 3.5 Scale Factor: 10 - Q70 Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x 1000GB Samsung SSD 980 1TB . 12.35 |======================================= Apache Spark TPC-DS 3.5 Scale Factor: 10 - Q69 Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x 1000GB Samsung SSD 980 1TB . 12.54 |======================================= Apache Spark TPC-DS 3.5 Scale Factor: 10 - Q68 Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x 1000GB Samsung SSD 980 1TB . 11.81 |======================================= Apache Spark TPC-DS 3.5 Scale Factor: 10 - Q67 Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x 1000GB Samsung SSD 980 1TB . 35.85 |======================================= Apache Spark TPC-DS 3.5 Scale Factor: 10 - Q66 Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x 1000GB Samsung SSD 980 1TB . 12.31 |======================================= Apache Spark TPC-DS 3.5 Scale Factor: 10 - Q65 Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x 1000GB Samsung SSD 980 1TB . 18.83 |======================================= Apache Spark TPC-DS 3.5 Scale Factor: 10 - Q64 Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x 1000GB Samsung SSD 980 1TB . 52.61 |======================================= Apache Spark TPC-DS 3.5 Scale Factor: 10 - Q63 Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x 1000GB Samsung SSD 980 1TB . 8.44 |======================================== Apache Spark TPC-DS 3.5 Scale Factor: 10 - Q62 Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x 1000GB Samsung SSD 980 1TB . 7.54 |======================================== Apache Spark TPC-DS 3.5 Scale Factor: 10 - Q61 Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x 1000GB Samsung SSD 980 1TB . 5.55 |======================================== Apache Spark TPC-DS 3.5 Scale Factor: 10 - Q60 Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x 1000GB Samsung SSD 980 1TB . 12.78 |======================================= Apache Spark TPC-DS 3.5 Scale Factor: 10 - Q59 Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x 1000GB Samsung SSD 980 1TB . 12.75 |======================================= Apache Spark TPC-DS 3.5 Scale Factor: 10 - Q58 Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x 1000GB Samsung SSD 980 1TB . 12.56 |======================================= Apache Spark TPC-DS 3.5 Scale Factor: 10 - Q57 Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x 1000GB Samsung SSD 980 1TB . 14.81 |======================================= Apache Spark TPC-DS 3.5 Scale Factor: 10 - Q56 Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x 1000GB Samsung SSD 980 1TB . 11.57 |======================================= Apache Spark TPC-DS 3.5 Scale Factor: 10 - Q55 Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x 1000GB Samsung SSD 980 1TB . 7.66 |======================================== Apache Spark TPC-DS 3.5 Scale Factor: 10 - Q54 Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x 1000GB Samsung SSD 980 1TB . 16.88 |======================================= Apache Spark TPC-DS 3.5 Scale Factor: 10 - Q53 Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x 1000GB Samsung SSD 980 1TB . 8.58 |======================================== Apache Spark TPC-DS 3.5 Scale Factor: 10 - Q52 Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x 1000GB Samsung SSD 980 1TB . 7.63 |======================================== Apache Spark TPC-DS 3.5 Scale Factor: 10 - Q51 Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x 1000GB Samsung SSD 980 1TB . 25.19 |======================================= Apache Spark TPC-DS 3.5 Scale Factor: 10 - Q50 Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x 1000GB Samsung SSD 980 1TB . 21.07 |======================================= Apache Spark TPC-DS 3.5 Scale Factor: 10 - Q49 Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x 1000GB Samsung SSD 980 1TB . 18.38 |======================================= Apache Spark TPC-DS 3.5 Scale Factor: 10 - Q48 Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x 1000GB Samsung SSD 980 1TB . 9.64 |======================================== Apache Spark TPC-DS 3.5 Scale Factor: 10 - Q47 Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x 1000GB Samsung SSD 980 1TB . 18.23 |======================================= Apache Spark TPC-DS 3.5 Scale Factor: 10 - Q46 Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x 1000GB Samsung SSD 980 1TB . 11.76 |======================================= Apache Spark TPC-DS 3.5 Scale Factor: 10 - Q45 Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x 1000GB Samsung SSD 980 1TB . 8.17 |======================================== Apache Spark TPC-DS 3.5 Scale Factor: 10 - Q44 Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x 1000GB Samsung SSD 980 1TB . 5.21 |======================================== Apache Spark TPC-DS 3.5 Scale Factor: 10 - Q43 Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x 1000GB Samsung SSD 980 1TB . 7.58 |======================================== Apache Spark TPC-DS 3.5 Scale Factor: 10 - Q42 Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x 1000GB Samsung SSD 980 1TB . 7.35 |======================================== Apache Spark TPC-DS 3.5 Scale Factor: 10 - Q41 Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x 1000GB Samsung SSD 980 1TB . 5.27 |======================================== Apache Spark TPC-DS 3.5 Scale Factor: 10 - Q40 Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x 1000GB Samsung SSD 980 1TB . 16.92 |======================================= Apache Spark TPC-DS 3.5 Scale Factor: 10 - Q39 Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x 1000GB Samsung SSD 980 1TB . 12.37 |======================================= Apache Spark TPC-DS 3.5 Scale Factor: 10 - Q38 Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x 1000GB Samsung SSD 980 1TB . 16.10 |======================================= Apache Spark TPC-DS 3.5 Scale Factor: 10 - Q37 Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x 1000GB Samsung SSD 980 1TB . 13.16 |======================================= Apache Spark TPC-DS 3.5 Scale Factor: 10 - Q36 Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x 1000GB Samsung SSD 980 1TB . 10.96 |======================================= Apache Spark TPC-DS 3.5 Scale Factor: 10 - Q35 Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x 1000GB Samsung SSD 980 1TB . 13.90 |======================================= Apache Spark TPC-DS 3.5 Scale Factor: 10 - Q33 Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x 1000GB Samsung SSD 980 1TB . 12.08 |======================================= Apache Spark TPC-DS 3.5 Scale Factor: 10 - Q32 Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x 1000GB Samsung SSD 980 1TB . 7.69 |======================================== Apache Spark TPC-DS 3.5 Scale Factor: 10 - Q31 Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x 1000GB Samsung SSD 980 1TB . 17.56 |======================================= Apache Spark TPC-DS 3.5 Scale Factor: 10 - Q30 Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x 1000GB Samsung SSD 980 1TB . 9.22 |======================================== Apache Spark TPC-DS 3.5 Scale Factor: 10 - Q29 Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x 1000GB Samsung SSD 980 1TB . 41.81 |======================================= Apache Spark TPC-DS 3.5 Scale Factor: 10 - Q28 Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x 1000GB Samsung SSD 980 1TB . 20.36 |======================================= Apache Spark TPC-DS 3.5 Scale Factor: 10 - Q27 Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x 1000GB Samsung SSD 980 1TB . 11.63 |======================================= Apache Spark TPC-DS 3.5 Scale Factor: 10 - Q26 Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x 1000GB Samsung SSD 980 1TB . 9.15 |======================================== Apache Spark TPC-DS 3.5 Scale Factor: 10 - Q25 Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x 1000GB Samsung SSD 980 1TB . 38.94 |======================================= Apache Spark TPC-DS 3.5 Scale Factor: 10 - Q24 Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x 1000GB Samsung SSD 980 1TB . 19.65 |======================================= Apache Spark TPC-DS 3.5 Scale Factor: 10 - Q23 Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x 1000GB Samsung SSD 980 1TB . 37.95 |======================================= Apache Spark TPC-DS 3.5 Scale Factor: 10 - Q22 Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x 1000GB Samsung SSD 980 1TB . 25.20 |======================================= Apache Spark TPC-DS 3.5 Scale Factor: 10 - Q21 Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x 1000GB Samsung SSD 980 1TB . 12.32 |======================================= Apache Spark TPC-DS 3.5 Scale Factor: 10 - Q20 Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x 1000GB Samsung SSD 980 1TB . 3.95 |======================================== Apache Spark TPC-DS 3.5 Scale Factor: 10 - Q19 Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x 1000GB Samsung SSD 980 1TB . 10.34 |======================================= Apache Spark TPC-DS 3.5 Scale Factor: 10 - Q18 Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x 1000GB Samsung SSD 980 1TB . 12.14 |======================================= Apache Spark TPC-DS 3.5 Scale Factor: 10 - Q17 Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x 1000GB Samsung SSD 980 1TB . 42.65 |======================================= Apache Spark TPC-DS 3.5 Scale Factor: 10 - Q15 Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x 1000GB Samsung SSD 980 1TB . 9.39 |======================================== Apache Spark TPC-DS 3.5 Scale Factor: 10 - Q14 Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x 1000GB Samsung SSD 980 1TB . 26.27 |======================================= Apache Spark TPC-DS 3.5 Scale Factor: 10 - Q12 Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x 1000GB Samsung SSD 980 1TB . 4.00 |======================================== Apache Spark TPC-DS 3.5 Scale Factor: 10 - Q11 Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x 1000GB Samsung SSD 980 1TB . 39.86 |======================================= Apache Spark TPC-DS 3.5 Scale Factor: 10 - Q10 Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x 1000GB Samsung SSD 980 1TB . 12.61 |======================================= Apache Spark TPC-DS 3.5 Scale Factor: 10 - Q09 Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x 1000GB Samsung SSD 980 1TB . 11.83 |======================================= Apache Spark TPC-DS 3.5 Scale Factor: 10 - Q08 Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x 1000GB Samsung SSD 980 1TB . 10.13 |======================================= Apache Spark TPC-DS 3.5 Scale Factor: 10 - Q07 Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x 1000GB Samsung SSD 980 1TB . 11.34 |======================================= Apache Spark TPC-DS 3.5 Scale Factor: 10 - Q06 Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x 1000GB Samsung SSD 980 1TB . 19.32 |======================================= Apache Spark TPC-DS 3.5 Scale Factor: 10 - Q05 Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x 1000GB Samsung SSD 980 1TB . 23.64 |======================================= Apache Spark TPC-DS 3.5 Scale Factor: 10 - Q04 Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x 1000GB Samsung SSD 980 1TB . 48.44 |======================================= Apache Spark TPC-DS 3.5 Scale Factor: 10 - Q03 Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x 1000GB Samsung SSD 980 1TB . 7.39 |======================================== Apache Spark TPC-DS 3.5 Scale Factor: 10 - Q02 Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x 1000GB Samsung SSD 980 1TB . 10.11 |======================================= Apache Spark TPC-DS 3.5 Scale Factor: 10 - Q01 Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x 1000GB Samsung SSD 980 1TB . 9.74 |======================================== Apache Spark TPC-DS 3.5 Scale Factor: 100 - Q26 Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x 1000GB Samsung SSD 980 1TB . 23.86 |======================================= Apache Spark TPC-DS 3.5 Scale Factor: 100 - Q99 Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x 1000GB Samsung SSD 980 1TB . 24.13 |======================================= Apache Spark TPC-DS 3.5 Scale Factor: 100 - Q98 Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x 1000GB Samsung SSD 980 1TB . 4.10 |======================================== Apache Spark TPC-DS 3.5 Scale Factor: 100 - Q97 Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x 1000GB Samsung SSD 980 1TB . 79.77 |======================================= Apache Spark TPC-DS 3.5 Scale Factor: 100 - Q96 Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x 1000GB Samsung SSD 980 1TB . 15.35 |======================================= Apache Spark TPC-DS 3.5 Scale Factor: 100 - Q95 Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x 1000GB Samsung SSD 980 1TB . 31.98 |======================================= Apache Spark TPC-DS 3.5 Scale Factor: 100 - Q94 Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x 1000GB Samsung SSD 980 1TB . 35.31 |======================================= Apache Spark TPC-DS 3.5 Scale Factor: 100 - Q93 Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x 1000GB Samsung SSD 980 1TB . 169.59 |====================================== Apache Spark TPC-DS 3.5 Scale Factor: 100 - Q92 Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x 1000GB Samsung SSD 980 1TB . 15.24 |======================================= Apache Spark TPC-DS 3.5 Scale Factor: 100 - Q91 Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x 1000GB Samsung SSD 980 1TB . 10.43 |======================================= Apache Spark TPC-DS 3.5 Scale Factor: 100 - Q90 Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x 1000GB Samsung SSD 980 1TB . 11.31 |======================================= Apache Spark TPC-DS 3.5 Scale Factor: 100 - Q89 Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x 1000GB Samsung SSD 980 1TB . 28.41 |======================================= Apache Spark TPC-DS 3.5 Scale Factor: 100 - Q88 Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x 1000GB Samsung SSD 980 1TB . 73.25 |======================================= Apache Spark TPC-DS 3.5 Scale Factor: 100 - Q87 Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x 1000GB Samsung SSD 980 1TB . 84.23 |======================================= Apache Spark TPC-DS 3.5 Scale Factor: 100 - Q86 Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x 1000GB Samsung SSD 980 1TB . 15.66 |======================================= Apache Spark TPC-DS 3.5 Scale Factor: 100 - Q85 Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x 1000GB Samsung SSD 980 1TB . 24.62 |======================================= Apache Spark TPC-DS 3.5 Scale Factor: 100 - Q84 Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x 1000GB Samsung SSD 980 1TB . 13.47 |======================================= Apache Spark TPC-DS 3.5 Scale Factor: 100 - Q83 Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x 1000GB Samsung SSD 980 1TB . 14.22 |======================================= Apache Spark TPC-DS 3.5 Scale Factor: 100 - Q82 Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x 1000GB Samsung SSD 980 1TB . 27.92 |======================================= Apache Spark TPC-DS 3.5 Scale Factor: 100 - Q81 Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x 1000GB Samsung SSD 980 1TB . 16.17 |======================================= Apache Spark TPC-DS 3.5 Scale Factor: 100 - Q80 Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x 1000GB Samsung SSD 980 1TB . 126.25 |====================================== Apache Spark TPC-DS 3.5 Scale Factor: 100 - Q79 Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x 1000GB Samsung SSD 980 1TB . 37.87 |======================================= Apache Spark TPC-DS 3.5 Scale Factor: 100 - Q78 Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x 1000GB Samsung SSD 980 1TB . 219.95 |====================================== Apache Spark TPC-DS 3.5 Scale Factor: 100 - Q77 Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x 1000GB Samsung SSD 980 1TB . 41.85 |======================================= Apache Spark TPC-DS 3.5 Scale Factor: 100 - Q76 Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x 1000GB Samsung SSD 980 1TB . 34.39 |======================================= Apache Spark TPC-DS 3.5 Scale Factor: 100 - Q75 Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x 1000GB Samsung SSD 980 1TB . 119.21 |====================================== Apache Spark TPC-DS 3.5 Scale Factor: 100 - Q74 Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x 1000GB Samsung SSD 980 1TB . 153.79 |====================================== Apache Spark TPC-DS 3.5 Scale Factor: 100 - Q73 Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x 1000GB Samsung SSD 980 1TB . 24.66 |======================================= Apache Spark TPC-DS 3.5 Scale Factor: 100 - Q72 Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x 1000GB Samsung SSD 980 1TB . 172.78 |====================================== Apache Spark TPC-DS 3.5 Scale Factor: 100 - Q71 Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x 1000GB Samsung SSD 980 1TB . 39.54 |======================================= Apache Spark TPC-DS 3.5 Scale Factor: 100 - Q70 Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x 1000GB Samsung SSD 980 1TB . 44.70 |======================================= Apache Spark TPC-DS 3.5 Scale Factor: 100 - Q69 Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x 1000GB Samsung SSD 980 1TB . 27.95 |======================================= Apache Spark TPC-DS 3.5 Scale Factor: 100 - Q68 Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x 1000GB Samsung SSD 980 1TB . 39.83 |======================================= Apache Spark TPC-DS 3.5 Scale Factor: 100 - Q67 Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x 1000GB Samsung SSD 980 1TB . 293.75 |====================================== Apache Spark TPC-DS 3.5 Scale Factor: 100 - Q66 Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x 1000GB Samsung SSD 980 1TB . 31.16 |======================================= Apache Spark TPC-DS 3.5 Scale Factor: 100 - Q65 Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x 1000GB Samsung SSD 980 1TB . 89.00 |======================================= Apache Spark TPC-DS 3.5 Scale Factor: 100 - Q64 Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x 1000GB Samsung SSD 980 1TB . 200.51 |====================================== Apache Spark TPC-DS 3.5 Scale Factor: 100 - Q63 Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x 1000GB Samsung SSD 980 1TB . 21.69 |======================================= Apache Spark TPC-DS 3.5 Scale Factor: 100 - Q62 Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x 1000GB Samsung SSD 980 1TB . 15.58 |======================================= Apache Spark TPC-DS 3.5 Scale Factor: 100 - Q61 Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x 1000GB Samsung SSD 980 1TB . 6.15 |======================================== Apache Spark TPC-DS 3.5 Scale Factor: 100 - Q60 Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x 1000GB Samsung SSD 980 1TB . 37.01 |======================================= Apache Spark TPC-DS 3.5 Scale Factor: 100 - Q59 Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x 1000GB Samsung SSD 980 1TB . 53.77 |======================================= Apache Spark TPC-DS 3.5 Scale Factor: 100 - Q58 Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x 1000GB Samsung SSD 980 1TB . 39.46 |======================================= Apache Spark TPC-DS 3.5 Scale Factor: 100 - Q57 Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x 1000GB Samsung SSD 980 1TB . 30.92 |======================================= Apache Spark TPC-DS 3.5 Scale Factor: 100 - Q56 Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x 1000GB Samsung SSD 980 1TB . 32.73 |======================================= Apache Spark TPC-DS 3.5 Scale Factor: 100 - Q55 Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x 1000GB Samsung SSD 980 1TB . 19.84 |======================================= Apache Spark TPC-DS 3.5 Scale Factor: 100 - Q54 Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x 1000GB Samsung SSD 980 1TB . 39.08 |======================================= Apache Spark TPC-DS 3.5 Scale Factor: 100 - Q53 Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x 1000GB Samsung SSD 980 1TB . 22.05 |======================================= Apache Spark TPC-DS 3.5 Scale Factor: 100 - Q52 Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x 1000GB Samsung SSD 980 1TB . 21.50 |======================================= Apache Spark TPC-DS 3.5 Scale Factor: 100 - Q51 Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x 1000GB Samsung SSD 980 1TB . 119.82 |====================================== Apache Spark TPC-DS 3.5 Scale Factor: 100 - Q50 Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x 1000GB Samsung SSD 980 1TB . 127.77 |====================================== Apache Spark TPC-DS 3.5 Scale Factor: 100 - Q49 Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x 1000GB Samsung SSD 980 1TB . 54.50 |======================================= Apache Spark TPC-DS 3.5 Scale Factor: 100 - Q48 Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x 1000GB Samsung SSD 980 1TB . 27.37 |======================================= Apache Spark TPC-DS 3.5 Scale Factor: 100 - Q47 Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x 1000GB Samsung SSD 980 1TB . 58.78 |======================================= Apache Spark TPC-DS 3.5 Scale Factor: 100 - Q46 Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x 1000GB Samsung SSD 980 1TB . 38.95 |======================================= Apache Spark TPC-DS 3.5 Scale Factor: 100 - Q45 Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x 1000GB Samsung SSD 980 1TB . 16.32 |======================================= Apache Spark TPC-DS 3.5 Scale Factor: 100 - Q44 Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x 1000GB Samsung SSD 980 1TB . 31.20 |======================================= Apache Spark TPC-DS 3.5 Scale Factor: 100 - Q43 Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x 1000GB Samsung SSD 980 1TB . 20.80 |======================================= Apache Spark TPC-DS 3.5 Scale Factor: 100 - Q42 Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x 1000GB Samsung SSD 980 1TB . 19.01 |======================================= Apache Spark TPC-DS 3.5 Scale Factor: 100 - Q41 Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x 1000GB Samsung SSD 980 1TB . 5.39 |======================================== Apache Spark TPC-DS 3.5 Scale Factor: 100 - Q40 Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x 1000GB Samsung SSD 980 1TB . 24.23 |======================================= Apache Spark TPC-DS 3.5 Scale Factor: 100 - Q39 Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x 1000GB Samsung SSD 980 1TB . 28.91 |======================================= Apache Spark TPC-DS 3.5 Scale Factor: 100 - Q38 Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x 1000GB Samsung SSD 980 1TB . 83.72 |======================================= Apache Spark TPC-DS 3.5 Scale Factor: 100 - Q37 Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x 1000GB Samsung SSD 980 1TB . 21.72 |======================================= Apache Spark TPC-DS 3.5 Scale Factor: 100 - Q36 Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x 1000GB Samsung SSD 980 1TB . 38.83 |======================================= Apache Spark TPC-DS 3.5 Scale Factor: 100 - Q35 Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x 1000GB Samsung SSD 980 1TB . 40.72 |======================================= Apache Spark TPC-DS 3.5 Scale Factor: 100 - Q34 Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x 1000GB Samsung SSD 980 1TB . 26.31 |======================================= Apache Spark TPC-DS 3.5 Scale Factor: 100 - Q33 Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x 1000GB Samsung SSD 980 1TB . 33.78 |======================================= Apache Spark TPC-DS 3.5 Scale Factor: 100 - Q32 Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x 1000GB Samsung SSD 980 1TB . 22.46 |======================================= Apache Spark TPC-DS 3.5 Scale Factor: 100 - Q31 Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x 1000GB Samsung SSD 980 1TB . 68.40 |======================================= Apache Spark TPC-DS 3.5 Scale Factor: 100 - Q30 Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x 1000GB Samsung SSD 980 1TB . 16.17 |======================================= Apache Spark TPC-DS 3.5 Scale Factor: 100 - Q29 Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x 1000GB Samsung SSD 980 1TB . 63.23 |======================================= Apache Spark TPC-DS 3.5 Scale Factor: 100 - Q28 Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x 1000GB Samsung SSD 980 1TB . 104.70 |====================================== Apache Spark TPC-DS 3.5 Scale Factor: 100 - Q27 Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x 1000GB Samsung SSD 980 1TB . 39.84 |======================================= Apache Spark TPC-DS 3.5 Scale Factor: 100 - Q25 Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x 1000GB Samsung SSD 980 1TB . 50.29 |======================================= Apache Spark TPC-DS 3.5 Scale Factor: 100 - Q24 Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x 1000GB Samsung SSD 980 1TB . 50.78 |======================================= Apache Spark TPC-DS 3.5 Scale Factor: 100 - Q23 Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x 1000GB Samsung SSD 980 1TB . 267.32 |====================================== Apache Spark TPC-DS 3.5 Scale Factor: 100 - Q22 Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x 1000GB Samsung SSD 980 1TB . 69.48 |======================================= Apache Spark TPC-DS 3.5 Scale Factor: 100 - Q21 Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x 1000GB Samsung SSD 980 1TB . 23.75 |======================================= Apache Spark TPC-DS 3.5 Scale Factor: 100 - Q20 Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x 1000GB Samsung SSD 980 1TB . 4.22 |======================================== Apache Spark TPC-DS 3.5 Scale Factor: 100 - Q19 Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x 1000GB Samsung SSD 980 1TB . 30.63 |======================================= Apache Spark TPC-DS 3.5 Scale Factor: 100 - Q18 Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x 1000GB Samsung SSD 980 1TB . 31.76 |======================================= Apache Spark TPC-DS 3.5 Scale Factor: 100 - Q17 Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x 1000GB Samsung SSD 980 1TB . 51.21 |======================================= Apache Spark TPC-DS 3.5 Scale Factor: 100 - Q15 Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x 1000GB Samsung SSD 980 1TB . 28.69 |======================================= Apache Spark TPC-DS 3.5 Scale Factor: 100 - Q14 Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x 1000GB Samsung SSD 980 1TB . 139.96 |====================================== Apache Spark TPC-DS 3.5 Scale Factor: 100 - Q13 Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x 1000GB Samsung SSD 980 1TB . 33.68 |======================================= Apache Spark TPC-DS 3.5 Scale Factor: 100 - Q12 Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x 1000GB Samsung SSD 980 1TB . 4.36 |======================================== Apache Spark TPC-DS 3.5 Scale Factor: 100 - Q11 Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x 1000GB Samsung SSD 980 1TB . 144.83 |====================================== Apache Spark TPC-DS 3.5 Scale Factor: 100 - Q10 Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x 1000GB Samsung SSD 980 1TB . 28.74 |======================================= Apache Spark TPC-DS 3.5 Scale Factor: 100 - Q09 Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x 1000GB Samsung SSD 980 1TB . 51.15 |======================================= Apache Spark TPC-DS 3.5 Scale Factor: 100 - Q08 Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x 1000GB Samsung SSD 980 1TB . 24.57 |======================================= Apache Spark TPC-DS 3.5 Scale Factor: 100 - Q07 Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x 1000GB Samsung SSD 980 1TB . 40.91 |======================================= Apache Spark TPC-DS 3.5 Scale Factor: 100 - Q06 Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x 1000GB Samsung SSD 980 1TB . 24.50 |======================================= Apache Spark TPC-DS 3.5 Scale Factor: 100 - Q05 Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x 1000GB Samsung SSD 980 1TB . 90.74 |======================================= Apache Spark TPC-DS 3.5 Scale Factor: 100 - Q04 Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x 1000GB Samsung SSD 980 1TB . 212.09 |====================================== Apache Spark TPC-DS 3.5 Scale Factor: 100 - Q03 Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x 1000GB Samsung SSD 980 1TB . 23.27 |======================================= Apache Spark TPC-DS 3.5 Scale Factor: 100 - Q02 Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x 1000GB Samsung SSD 980 1TB . 31.21 |======================================= Apache Spark TPC-DS 3.5 Scale Factor: 100 - Q01 Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x 1000GB Samsung SSD 980 1TB . 20.47 |======================================= Apache Spark TPC-DS 3.5 Scale Factor: 50 - Q81 Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x 1000GB Samsung SSD 980 1TB . 13.24 |======================================= Apache Spark TPC-DS 3.5 Scale Factor: 50 - Q70 Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x 1000GB Samsung SSD 980 1TB . 26.71 |======================================= Apache Spark TPC-DS 3.5 Scale Factor: 50 - Q48 Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x 1000GB Samsung SSD 980 1TB . 18.34 |======================================= Apache Spark TPC-DS 3.5 Scale Factor: 50 - Q45 Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x 1000GB Samsung SSD 980 1TB . 12.46 |======================================= Apache Spark TPC-DS 3.5 Scale Factor: 50 - Q99 Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x 1000GB Samsung SSD 980 1TB . 17.01 |======================================= Apache Spark TPC-DS 3.5 Scale Factor: 50 - Q98 Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x 1000GB Samsung SSD 980 1TB . 4.06 |======================================== Apache Spark TPC-DS 3.5 Scale Factor: 50 - Q97 Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x 1000GB Samsung SSD 980 1TB . 46.14 |======================================= Apache Spark TPC-DS 3.5 Scale Factor: 50 - Q96 Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x 1000GB Samsung SSD 980 1TB . 10.45 |======================================= Apache Spark TPC-DS 3.5 Scale Factor: 50 - Q95 Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x 1000GB Samsung SSD 980 1TB . 18.34 |======================================= Apache Spark TPC-DS 3.5 Scale Factor: 50 - Q94 Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x 1000GB Samsung SSD 980 1TB . 18.87 |======================================= Apache Spark TPC-DS 3.5 Scale Factor: 50 - Q93 Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x 1000GB Samsung SSD 980 1TB . 103.14 |====================================== Apache Spark TPC-DS 3.5 Scale Factor: 50 - Q92 Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x 1000GB Samsung SSD 980 1TB . 11.00 |======================================= Apache Spark TPC-DS 3.5 Scale Factor: 50 - Q91 Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x 1000GB Samsung SSD 980 1TB . 9.32 |======================================== Apache Spark TPC-DS 3.5 Scale Factor: 50 - Q90 Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x 1000GB Samsung SSD 980 1TB . 9.00 |======================================== Apache Spark TPC-DS 3.5 Scale Factor: 50 - Q89 Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x 1000GB Samsung SSD 980 1TB . 19.73 |======================================= Apache Spark TPC-DS 3.5 Scale Factor: 50 - Q88 Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x 1000GB Samsung SSD 980 1TB . 44.50 |======================================= Apache Spark TPC-DS 3.5 Scale Factor: 50 - Q87 Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x 1000GB Samsung SSD 980 1TB . 47.61 |======================================= Apache Spark TPC-DS 3.5 Scale Factor: 50 - Q86 Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x 1000GB Samsung SSD 980 1TB . 11.31 |======================================= Apache Spark TPC-DS 3.5 Scale Factor: 50 - Q85 Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x 1000GB Samsung SSD 980 1TB . 17.28 |======================================= Apache Spark TPC-DS 3.5 Scale Factor: 50 - Q84 Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x 1000GB Samsung SSD 980 1TB . 9.75 |======================================== Apache Spark TPC-DS 3.5 Scale Factor: 50 - Q83 Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x 1000GB Samsung SSD 980 1TB . 11.28 |======================================= Apache Spark TPC-DS 3.5 Scale Factor: 50 - Q82 Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x 1000GB Samsung SSD 980 1TB . 47.71 |======================================= Apache Spark TPC-DS 3.5 Scale Factor: 50 - Q80 Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x 1000GB Samsung SSD 980 1TB . 194.76 |====================================== Apache Spark TPC-DS 3.5 Scale Factor: 50 - Q79 Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x 1000GB Samsung SSD 980 1TB . 24.23 |======================================= Apache Spark TPC-DS 3.5 Scale Factor: 50 - Q78 Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x 1000GB Samsung SSD 980 1TB . 177.74 |====================================== Apache Spark TPC-DS 3.5 Scale Factor: 50 - Q77 Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x 1000GB Samsung SSD 980 1TB . 25.15 |======================================= Apache Spark TPC-DS 3.5 Scale Factor: 50 - Q76 Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x 1000GB Samsung SSD 980 1TB . 21.89 |======================================= Apache Spark TPC-DS 3.5 Scale Factor: 50 - Q75 Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x 1000GB Samsung SSD 980 1TB . 65.58 |======================================= Apache Spark TPC-DS 3.5 Scale Factor: 50 - Q74 Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x 1000GB Samsung SSD 980 1TB . 127.30 |====================================== Apache Spark TPC-DS 3.5 Scale Factor: 50 - Q73 Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x 1000GB Samsung SSD 980 1TB . 17.34 |======================================= Apache Spark TPC-DS 3.5 Scale Factor: 50 - Q72 Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x 1000GB Samsung SSD 980 1TB . 490.30 |====================================== Apache Spark TPC-DS 3.5 Scale Factor: 50 - Q71 Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x 1000GB Samsung SSD 980 1TB . 23.34 |======================================= Apache Spark TPC-DS 3.5 Scale Factor: 50 - Q69 Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x 1000GB Samsung SSD 980 1TB . 20.90 |======================================= Apache Spark TPC-DS 3.5 Scale Factor: 50 - Q68 Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x 1000GB Samsung SSD 980 1TB . 24.65 |======================================= Apache Spark TPC-DS 3.5 Scale Factor: 50 - Q67 Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x 1000GB Samsung SSD 980 1TB . 142.67 |====================================== Apache Spark TPC-DS 3.5 Scale Factor: 50 - Q66 Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x 1000GB Samsung SSD 980 1TB . 22.34 |======================================= Apache Spark TPC-DS 3.5 Scale Factor: 50 - Q65 Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x 1000GB Samsung SSD 980 1TB . 47.94 |======================================= Apache Spark TPC-DS 3.5 Scale Factor: 50 - Q64 Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x 1000GB Samsung SSD 980 1TB . 198.70 |====================================== Apache Spark TPC-DS 3.5 Scale Factor: 50 - Q63 Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x 1000GB Samsung SSD 980 1TB . 15.43 |======================================= Apache Spark TPC-DS 3.5 Scale Factor: 50 - Q62 Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x 1000GB Samsung SSD 980 1TB . 12.53 |======================================= Apache Spark TPC-DS 3.5 Scale Factor: 50 - Q61 Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x 1000GB Samsung SSD 980 1TB . 5.85 |======================================== Apache Spark TPC-DS 3.5 Scale Factor: 50 - Q60 Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x 1000GB Samsung SSD 980 1TB . 25.46 |======================================= Apache Spark TPC-DS 3.5 Scale Factor: 50 - Q59 Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x 1000GB Samsung SSD 980 1TB . 32.23 |======================================= Apache Spark TPC-DS 3.5 Scale Factor: 50 - Q58 Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x 1000GB Samsung SSD 980 1TB . 25.91 |======================================= Apache Spark TPC-DS 3.5 Scale Factor: 50 - Q57 Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x 1000GB Samsung SSD 980 1TB . 25.75 |======================================= Apache Spark TPC-DS 3.5 Scale Factor: 50 - Q56 Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x 1000GB Samsung SSD 980 1TB . 21.84 |======================================= Apache Spark TPC-DS 3.5 Scale Factor: 50 - Q55 Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x 1000GB Samsung SSD 980 1TB . 13.81 |======================================= Apache Spark TPC-DS 3.5 Scale Factor: 50 - Q54 Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x 1000GB Samsung SSD 980 1TB . 48.46 |======================================= Apache Spark TPC-DS 3.5 Scale Factor: 50 - Q53 Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x 1000GB Samsung SSD 980 1TB . 15.35 |======================================= Apache Spark TPC-DS 3.5 Scale Factor: 50 - Q52 Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x 1000GB Samsung SSD 980 1TB . 13.80 |======================================= Apache Spark TPC-DS 3.5 Scale Factor: 50 - Q51 Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x 1000GB Samsung SSD 980 1TB . 71.06 |======================================= Apache Spark TPC-DS 3.5 Scale Factor: 50 - Q50 Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x 1000GB Samsung SSD 980 1TB . 74.05 |======================================= Apache Spark TPC-DS 3.5 Scale Factor: 50 - Q49 Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x 1000GB Samsung SSD 980 1TB . 47.95 |======================================= Apache Spark TPC-DS 3.5 Scale Factor: 50 - Q47 Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x 1000GB Samsung SSD 980 1TB . 34.87 |======================================= Apache Spark TPC-DS 3.5 Scale Factor: 50 - Q46 Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x 1000GB Samsung SSD 980 1TB . 25.38 |======================================= Apache Spark TPC-DS 3.5 Scale Factor: 50 - Q44 Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x 1000GB Samsung SSD 980 1TB . 6.23 |======================================== Apache Spark TPC-DS 3.5 Scale Factor: 50 - Q43 Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x 1000GB Samsung SSD 980 1TB . 14.37 |======================================= Apache Spark TPC-DS 3.5 Scale Factor: 50 - Q42 Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x 1000GB Samsung SSD 980 1TB . 13.22 |======================================= Apache Spark TPC-DS 3.5 Scale Factor: 50 - Q41 Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x 1000GB Samsung SSD 980 1TB . 5.36 |======================================== Apache Spark TPC-DS 3.5 Scale Factor: 50 - Q40 Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x 1000GB Samsung SSD 980 1TB . 43.98 |======================================= Apache Spark TPC-DS 3.5 Scale Factor: 50 - Q39 Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x 1000GB Samsung SSD 980 1TB . 19.59 |======================================= Apache Spark TPC-DS 3.5 Scale Factor: 50 - Q38 Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x 1000GB Samsung SSD 980 1TB . 48.08 |======================================= Apache Spark TPC-DS 3.5 Scale Factor: 50 - Q37 Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x 1000GB Samsung SSD 980 1TB . 25.80 |======================================= Apache Spark TPC-DS 3.5 Scale Factor: 50 - Q36 Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x 1000GB Samsung SSD 980 1TB . 25.46 |======================================= Apache Spark TPC-DS 3.5 Scale Factor: 50 - Q35 Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x 1000GB Samsung SSD 980 1TB . 25.65 |======================================= Apache Spark TPC-DS 3.5 Scale Factor: 50 - Q34 Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x 1000GB Samsung SSD 980 1TB . 18.18 |======================================= Apache Spark TPC-DS 3.5 Scale Factor: 50 - Q33 Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x 1000GB Samsung SSD 980 1TB . 23.47 |======================================= Apache Spark TPC-DS 3.5 Scale Factor: 50 - Q32 Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x 1000GB Samsung SSD 980 1TB . 13.63 |======================================= Apache Spark TPC-DS 3.5 Scale Factor: 50 - Q31 Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x 1000GB Samsung SSD 980 1TB . 39.24 |======================================= Apache Spark TPC-DS 3.5 Scale Factor: 50 - Q30 Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x 1000GB Samsung SSD 980 1TB . 13.17 |======================================= Apache Spark TPC-DS 3.5 Scale Factor: 50 - Q29 Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x 1000GB Samsung SSD 980 1TB . 154.93 |====================================== Apache Spark TPC-DS 3.5 Scale Factor: 50 - Q28 Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x 1000GB Samsung SSD 980 1TB . 61.17 |======================================= Apache Spark TPC-DS 3.5 Scale Factor: 50 - Q27 Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x 1000GB Samsung SSD 980 1TB . 24.44 |======================================= Apache Spark TPC-DS 3.5 Scale Factor: 50 - Q26 Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x 1000GB Samsung SSD 980 1TB . 16.69 |======================================= Apache Spark TPC-DS 3.5 Scale Factor: 50 - Q25 Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x 1000GB Samsung SSD 980 1TB . 131.62 |====================================== Apache Spark TPC-DS 3.5 Scale Factor: 50 - Q24 Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x 1000GB Samsung SSD 980 1TB . 76.17 |======================================= Apache Spark TPC-DS 3.5 Scale Factor: 50 - Q23 Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x 1000GB Samsung SSD 980 1TB . 186.29 |====================================== Apache Spark TPC-DS 3.5 Scale Factor: 50 - Q22 Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x 1000GB Samsung SSD 980 1TB . 38.53 |======================================= Apache Spark TPC-DS 3.5 Scale Factor: 50 - Q21 Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x 1000GB Samsung SSD 980 1TB . 15.48 |======================================= Apache Spark TPC-DS 3.5 Scale Factor: 50 - Q20 Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x 1000GB Samsung SSD 980 1TB . 4.19 |======================================== Apache Spark TPC-DS 3.5 Scale Factor: 50 - Q19 Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x 1000GB Samsung SSD 980 1TB . 19.69 |======================================= Apache Spark TPC-DS 3.5 Scale Factor: 50 - Q18 Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x 1000GB Samsung SSD 980 1TB . 21.96 |======================================= Apache Spark TPC-DS 3.5 Scale Factor: 50 - Q17 Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x 1000GB Samsung SSD 980 1TB . 154.26 |====================================== Apache Spark TPC-DS 3.5 Scale Factor: 50 - Q15 Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x 1000GB Samsung SSD 980 1TB . 19.34 |======================================= Apache Spark TPC-DS 3.5 Scale Factor: 50 - Q14 Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x 1000GB Samsung SSD 980 1TB . 107.48 |====================================== Apache Spark TPC-DS 3.5 Scale Factor: 50 - Q13 Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x 1000GB Samsung SSD 980 1TB . 20.86 |======================================= Apache Spark TPC-DS 3.5 Scale Factor: 50 - Q12 Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x 1000GB Samsung SSD 980 1TB . 4.15 |======================================== Apache Spark TPC-DS 3.5 Scale Factor: 50 - Q11 Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x 1000GB Samsung SSD 980 1TB . 118.87 |====================================== Apache Spark TPC-DS 3.5 Scale Factor: 50 - Q10 Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x 1000GB Samsung SSD 980 1TB . 20.86 |======================================= Apache Spark TPC-DS 3.5 Scale Factor: 50 - Q09 Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x 1000GB Samsung SSD 980 1TB . 27.41 |======================================= Apache Spark TPC-DS 3.5 Scale Factor: 50 - Q08 Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x 1000GB Samsung SSD 980 1TB . 17.18 |======================================= Apache Spark TPC-DS 3.5 Scale Factor: 50 - Q07 Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x 1000GB Samsung SSD 980 1TB . 25.35 |======================================= Apache Spark TPC-DS 3.5 Scale Factor: 50 - Q06 Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x 1000GB Samsung SSD 980 1TB . 58.51 |======================================= Apache Spark TPC-DS 3.5 Scale Factor: 50 - Q05 Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x 1000GB Samsung SSD 980 1TB . 54.48 |======================================= Apache Spark TPC-DS 3.5 Scale Factor: 50 - Q04 Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x 1000GB Samsung SSD 980 1TB . 164.17 |====================================== Apache Spark TPC-DS 3.5 Scale Factor: 50 - Q03 Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x 1000GB Samsung SSD 980 1TB . 14.07 |======================================= Apache Spark TPC-DS 3.5 Scale Factor: 50 - Q02 Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x 1000GB Samsung SSD 980 1TB . 18.58 |======================================= Apache Spark TPC-DS 3.5 Scale Factor: 50 - Q01 Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x 1000GB Samsung SSD 980 1TB . 15.69 |======================================= PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 800 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better E3-1200 btrfs 64GB . 20.03 |=================================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better E3-1200 btrfs 64GB . 18.11 |=================================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better E3-1200 btrfs 64GB . 40.76 |=================================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better E3-1200 btrfs 64GB . 79.46 |=================================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 800 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better E3-1200 btrfs 64GB . 131.70 |================================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 25000 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better E3-1200 btrfs 64GB . 7.367 |=================================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 25000 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better E3-1200 btrfs 64GB . 58.42 |=================================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 25000 - Clients: 1000 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better E3-1200 btrfs 64GB . 208.23 |================================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 25000 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better E3-1200 btrfs 64GB . 36.83 |=================================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 25000 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better E3-1200 btrfs 64GB . 3.008 |=================================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 25000 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better E3-1200 btrfs 64GB . 26.36 |=================================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 25000 - Clients: 800 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better E3-1200 btrfs 64GB . 161.70 |================================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 1000 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better E3-1200 btrfs 64GB . 26.61 |=================================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 25000 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better E3-1200 btrfs 64GB . 19.28 |=================================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 25000 - Clients: 800 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better E3-1200 btrfs 64GB . 33.73 |=================================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 25000 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better E3-1200 btrfs 64GB . 8.505 |=================================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 25000 - Clients: 1000 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better E3-1200 btrfs 64GB . 43.47 |=================================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 25000 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better E3-1200 btrfs 64GB . 107.56 |================================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 25000 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better E3-1200 btrfs 64GB . 1.466 |=================================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better E3-1200 btrfs 64GB . 5.784 |=================================================== Timed GCC Compilation 13.2 Time To Compile Seconds < Lower Is Better i3-7100 btrfs 16GB . 4314.80 |================================================= E3-1200 btrfs 64GB . 2228.29 |========================= PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better E3-1200 btrfs 64GB . 24.64 |=================================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 800 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better E3-1200 btrfs 64GB . 39989 |=================================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better E3-1200 btrfs 64GB . 2839 |==================================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better E3-1200 btrfs 64GB . 6279 |==================================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better E3-1200 btrfs 64GB . 6367 |==================================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 800 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better E3-1200 btrfs 64GB . 6106 |==================================================== Apache Spark TPC-DS 3.5 Scale Factor: 1 - Q63 Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x 1000GB Samsung SSD 980 1TB . 6.24 |======================================== Apache Spark TPC-DS 3.5 Scale Factor: 1 - Q97 Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x 1000GB Samsung SSD 980 1TB . 8.39 |======================================== Apache Spark TPC-DS 3.5 Scale Factor: 1 - Q93 Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x 1000GB Samsung SSD 980 1TB . 5.98 |======================================== Apache Spark TPC-DS 3.5 Scale Factor: 1 - Q89 Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x 1000GB Samsung SSD 980 1TB . 6.97 |======================================== Apache Spark TPC-DS 3.5 Scale Factor: 1 - Q87 Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x 1000GB Samsung SSD 980 1TB . 8.05 |======================================== Apache Spark TPC-DS 3.5 Scale Factor: 1 - Q78 Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x 1000GB Samsung SSD 980 1TB . 12.24 |======================================= Apache Spark TPC-DS 3.5 Scale Factor: 1 - Q42 Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x 1000GB Samsung SSD 980 1TB . 5.10 |======================================== Apache Spark TPC-DS 3.5 Scale Factor: 1 - Q99 Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x 1000GB Samsung SSD 980 1TB . 6.12 |======================================== Apache Spark TPC-DS 3.5 Scale Factor: 1 - Q98 Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x 1000GB Samsung SSD 980 1TB . 3.86 |======================================== Apache Spark TPC-DS 3.5 Scale Factor: 1 - Q96 Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x 1000GB Samsung SSD 980 1TB . 4.65 |======================================== Apache Spark TPC-DS 3.5 Scale Factor: 1 - Q95 Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x 1000GB Samsung SSD 980 1TB . 5.80 |======================================== Apache Spark TPC-DS 3.5 Scale Factor: 1 - Q94 Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x 1000GB Samsung SSD 980 1TB . 4.91 |======================================== Apache Spark TPC-DS 3.5 Scale Factor: 1 - Q92 Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x 1000GB Samsung SSD 980 1TB . 5.87 |======================================== Apache Spark TPC-DS 3.5 Scale Factor: 1 - Q91 Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x 1000GB Samsung SSD 980 1TB . 6.47 |======================================== Apache Spark TPC-DS 3.5 Scale Factor: 1 - Q90 Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x 1000GB Samsung SSD 980 1TB . 5.07 |======================================== Apache Spark TPC-DS 3.5 Scale Factor: 1 - Q88 Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x 1000GB Samsung SSD 980 1TB . 9.99 |======================================== Apache Spark TPC-DS 3.5 Scale Factor: 1 - Q86 Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x 1000GB Samsung SSD 980 1TB . 6.09 |======================================== Apache Spark TPC-DS 3.5 Scale Factor: 1 - Q85 Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x 1000GB Samsung SSD 980 1TB . 9.44 |======================================== Apache Spark TPC-DS 3.5 Scale Factor: 1 - Q84 Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x 1000GB Samsung SSD 980 1TB . 5.71 |======================================== Apache Spark TPC-DS 3.5 Scale Factor: 1 - Q83 Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x 1000GB Samsung SSD 980 1TB . 7.20 |======================================== Apache Spark TPC-DS 3.5 Scale Factor: 1 - Q82 Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x 1000GB Samsung SSD 980 1TB . 7.13 |======================================== Apache Spark TPC-DS 3.5 Scale Factor: 1 - Q81 Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x 1000GB Samsung SSD 980 1TB . 6.89 |======================================== Apache Spark TPC-DS 3.5 Scale Factor: 1 - Q80 Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x 1000GB Samsung SSD 980 1TB . 11.13 |======================================= Apache Spark TPC-DS 3.5 Scale Factor: 1 - Q79 Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x 1000GB Samsung SSD 980 1TB . 6.92 |======================================== Apache Spark TPC-DS 3.5 Scale Factor: 1 - Q77 Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x 1000GB Samsung SSD 980 1TB . 9.32 |======================================== Apache Spark TPC-DS 3.5 Scale Factor: 1 - Q76 Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x 1000GB Samsung SSD 980 1TB . 6.86 |======================================== Apache Spark TPC-DS 3.5 Scale Factor: 1 - Q75 Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x 1000GB Samsung SSD 980 1TB . 12.03 |======================================= Apache Spark TPC-DS 3.5 Scale Factor: 1 - Q74 Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x 1000GB Samsung SSD 980 1TB . 9.70 |======================================== Apache Spark TPC-DS 3.5 Scale Factor: 1 - Q73 Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x 1000GB Samsung SSD 980 1TB . 6.52 |======================================== Apache Spark TPC-DS 3.5 Scale Factor: 1 - Q72 Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x 1000GB Samsung SSD 980 1TB . 18.67 |======================================= Apache Spark TPC-DS 3.5 Scale Factor: 1 - Q71 Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x 1000GB Samsung SSD 980 1TB . 7.01 |======================================== Apache Spark TPC-DS 3.5 Scale Factor: 1 - Q70 Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x 1000GB Samsung SSD 980 1TB . 8.04 |======================================== Apache Spark TPC-DS 3.5 Scale Factor: 1 - Q69 Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x 1000GB Samsung SSD 980 1TB . 9.25 |======================================== Apache Spark TPC-DS 3.5 Scale Factor: 1 - Q68 Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x 1000GB Samsung SSD 980 1TB . 6.96 |======================================== Apache Spark TPC-DS 3.5 Scale Factor: 1 - Q67 Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x 1000GB Samsung SSD 980 1TB . 10.37 |======================================= Apache Spark TPC-DS 3.5 Scale Factor: 1 - Q66 Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x 1000GB Samsung SSD 980 1TB . 9.17 |======================================== Apache Spark TPC-DS 3.5 Scale Factor: 1 - Q65 Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x 1000GB Samsung SSD 980 1TB . 8.11 |======================================== Apache Spark TPC-DS 3.5 Scale Factor: 1 - Q64 Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x 1000GB Samsung SSD 980 1TB . 13.79 |======================================= Apache Spark TPC-DS 3.5 Scale Factor: 1 - Q62 Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x 1000GB Samsung SSD 980 1TB . 6.11 |======================================== Apache Spark TPC-DS 3.5 Scale Factor: 1 - Q61 Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x 1000GB Samsung SSD 980 1TB . 5.15 |======================================== Apache Spark TPC-DS 3.5 Scale Factor: 1 - Q60 Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x 1000GB Samsung SSD 980 1TB . 8.26 |======================================== Apache Spark TPC-DS 3.5 Scale Factor: 1 - Q59 Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x 1000GB Samsung SSD 980 1TB . 7.18 |======================================== Apache Spark TPC-DS 3.5 Scale Factor: 1 - Q58 Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x 1000GB Samsung SSD 980 1TB . 8.10 |======================================== Apache Spark TPC-DS 3.5 Scale Factor: 1 - Q57 Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x 1000GB Samsung SSD 980 1TB . 8.69 |======================================== Apache Spark TPC-DS 3.5 Scale Factor: 1 - Q56 Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x 1000GB Samsung SSD 980 1TB . 8.04 |======================================== Apache Spark TPC-DS 3.5 Scale Factor: 1 - Q55 Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x 1000GB Samsung SSD 980 1TB . 5.28 |======================================== Apache Spark TPC-DS 3.5 Scale Factor: 1 - Q54 Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x 1000GB Samsung SSD 980 1TB . 9.15 |======================================== Apache Spark TPC-DS 3.5 Scale Factor: 1 - Q53 Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x 1000GB Samsung SSD 980 1TB . 6.16 |======================================== Apache Spark TPC-DS 3.5 Scale Factor: 1 - Q52 Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x 1000GB Samsung SSD 980 1TB . 5.15 |======================================== Apache Spark TPC-DS 3.5 Scale Factor: 1 - Q51 Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x 1000GB Samsung SSD 980 1TB . 11.36 |======================================= Apache Spark TPC-DS 3.5 Scale Factor: 1 - Q50 Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x 1000GB Samsung SSD 980 1TB . 7.08 |======================================== Apache Spark TPC-DS 3.5 Scale Factor: 1 - Q49 Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x 1000GB Samsung SSD 980 1TB . 8.86 |======================================== Apache Spark TPC-DS 3.5 Scale Factor: 1 - Q48 Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x 1000GB Samsung SSD 980 1TB . 6.41 |======================================== Apache Spark TPC-DS 3.5 Scale Factor: 1 - Q47 Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x 1000GB Samsung SSD 980 1TB . 10.09 |======================================= Apache Spark TPC-DS 3.5 Scale Factor: 1 - Q46 Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x 1000GB Samsung SSD 980 1TB . 7.09 |======================================== Apache Spark TPC-DS 3.5 Scale Factor: 1 - Q45 Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x 1000GB Samsung SSD 980 1TB . 6.20 |======================================== Apache Spark TPC-DS 3.5 Scale Factor: 1 - Q44 Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x 1000GB Samsung SSD 980 1TB . 6.54 |======================================== Apache Spark TPC-DS 3.5 Scale Factor: 1 - Q43 Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x 1000GB Samsung SSD 980 1TB . 5.80 |======================================== Apache Spark TPC-DS 3.5 Scale Factor: 1 - Q41 Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x 1000GB Samsung SSD 980 1TB . 4.77 |======================================== Apache Spark TPC-DS 3.5 Scale Factor: 1 - Q40 Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x 1000GB Samsung SSD 980 1TB . 6.28 |======================================== Apache Spark TPC-DS 3.5 Scale Factor: 1 - Q39 Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x 1000GB Samsung SSD 980 1TB . 3.79 |======================================== Apache Spark TPC-DS 3.5 Scale Factor: 1 - Q38 Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x 1000GB Samsung SSD 980 1TB . 8.07 |======================================== Apache Spark TPC-DS 3.5 Scale Factor: 1 - Q37 Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x 1000GB Samsung SSD 980 1TB . 3.99 |======================================== Apache Spark TPC-DS 3.5 Scale Factor: 1 - Q36 Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x 1000GB Samsung SSD 980 1TB . 7.03 |======================================== Apache Spark TPC-DS 3.5 Scale Factor: 1 - Q35 Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x 1000GB Samsung SSD 980 1TB . 9.89 |======================================== Apache Spark TPC-DS 3.5 Scale Factor: 1 - Q34 Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x 1000GB Samsung SSD 980 1TB . 6.61 |======================================== Apache Spark TPC-DS 3.5 Scale Factor: 1 - Q33 Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x 1000GB Samsung SSD 980 1TB . 8.15 |======================================== Apache Spark TPC-DS 3.5 Scale Factor: 1 - Q32 Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x 1000GB Samsung SSD 980 1TB . 6.03 |======================================== Apache Spark TPC-DS 3.5 Scale Factor: 1 - Q31 Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x 1000GB Samsung SSD 980 1TB . 9.93 |======================================== Apache Spark TPC-DS 3.5 Scale Factor: 1 - Q30 Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x 1000GB Samsung SSD 980 1TB . 7.47 |======================================== Apache Spark TPC-DS 3.5 Scale Factor: 1 - Q29 Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x 1000GB Samsung SSD 980 1TB . 9.71 |======================================== Apache Spark TPC-DS 3.5 Scale Factor: 1 - Q28 Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x 1000GB Samsung SSD 980 1TB . 9.39 |======================================== Apache Spark TPC-DS 3.5 Scale Factor: 1 - Q27 Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x 1000GB Samsung SSD 980 1TB . 7.18 |======================================== Apache Spark TPC-DS 3.5 Scale Factor: 1 - Q26 Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x 1000GB Samsung SSD 980 1TB . 6.25 |======================================== Apache Spark TPC-DS 3.5 Scale Factor: 1 - Q25 Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x 1000GB Samsung SSD 980 1TB . 9.42 |======================================== Apache Spark TPC-DS 3.5 Scale Factor: 1 - Q24 Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x 1000GB Samsung SSD 980 1TB . 2.36 |======================================== Apache Spark TPC-DS 3.5 Scale Factor: 1 - Q23 Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x 1000GB Samsung SSD 980 1TB . 8.28 |======================================== Apache Spark TPC-DS 3.5 Scale Factor: 1 - Q22 Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x 1000GB Samsung SSD 980 1TB . 8.38 |======================================== Apache Spark TPC-DS 3.5 Scale Factor: 1 - Q21 Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x 1000GB Samsung SSD 980 1TB . 6.45 |======================================== Apache Spark TPC-DS 3.5 Scale Factor: 1 - Q20 Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x 1000GB Samsung SSD 980 1TB . 3.91 |======================================== Apache Spark TPC-DS 3.5 Scale Factor: 1 - Q19 Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x 1000GB Samsung SSD 980 1TB . 6.40 |======================================== Apache Spark TPC-DS 3.5 Scale Factor: 1 - Q18 Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x 1000GB Samsung SSD 980 1TB . 8.36 |======================================== Apache Spark TPC-DS 3.5 Scale Factor: 1 - Q17 Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x 1000GB Samsung SSD 980 1TB . 9.90 |======================================== Apache Spark TPC-DS 3.5 Scale Factor: 1 - Q16 Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x 1000GB Samsung SSD 980 1TB . 5.06 |======================================== Apache Spark TPC-DS 3.5 Scale Factor: 1 - Q15 Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x 1000GB Samsung SSD 980 1TB . 5.98 |======================================== Apache Spark TPC-DS 3.5 Scale Factor: 1 - Q14 Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x 1000GB Samsung SSD 980 1TB . 8.95 |======================================== Apache Spark TPC-DS 3.5 Scale Factor: 1 - Q13 Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x 1000GB Samsung SSD 980 1TB . 6.79 |======================================== Apache Spark TPC-DS 3.5 Scale Factor: 1 - Q12 Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x 1000GB Samsung SSD 980 1TB . 3.91 |======================================== Apache Spark TPC-DS 3.5 Scale Factor: 1 - Q11 Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x 1000GB Samsung SSD 980 1TB . 10.58 |======================================= Apache Spark TPC-DS 3.5 Scale Factor: 1 - Q10 Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x 1000GB Samsung SSD 980 1TB . 9.44 |======================================== Apache Spark TPC-DS 3.5 Scale Factor: 1 - Q09 Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x 1000GB Samsung SSD 980 1TB . 6.62 |======================================== Apache Spark TPC-DS 3.5 Scale Factor: 1 - Q08 Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x 1000GB Samsung SSD 980 1TB . 7.46 |======================================== Apache Spark TPC-DS 3.5 Scale Factor: 1 - Q07 Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x 1000GB Samsung SSD 980 1TB . 6.82 |======================================== Apache Spark TPC-DS 3.5 Scale Factor: 1 - Q06 Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x 1000GB Samsung SSD 980 1TB . 7.74 |======================================== Apache Spark TPC-DS 3.5 Scale Factor: 1 - Q05 Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x 1000GB Samsung SSD 980 1TB . 9.45 |======================================== Apache Spark TPC-DS 3.5 Scale Factor: 1 - Q04 Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x 1000GB Samsung SSD 980 1TB . 13.18 |======================================= Apache Spark TPC-DS 3.5 Scale Factor: 1 - Q03 Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x 1000GB Samsung SSD 980 1TB . 5.21 |======================================== Apache Spark TPC-DS 3.5 Scale Factor: 1 - Q02 Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x 1000GB Samsung SSD 980 1TB . 7.58 |======================================== Apache Spark TPC-DS 3.5 Scale Factor: 1 - Q01 Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x 1000GB Samsung SSD 980 1TB . 6.99 |======================================== etcd 3.5.4 Test: PUT - Connections: 50 - Clients: 100 Requests/sec > Higher Is Better PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 25000 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better E3-1200 btrfs 64GB . 136 |===================================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 25000 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better E3-1200 btrfs 64GB . 4287 |==================================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 25000 - Clients: 1000 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better E3-1200 btrfs 64GB . 4811 |==================================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 25000 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better E3-1200 btrfs 64GB . 2731 |==================================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 25000 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better E3-1200 btrfs 64GB . 33249 |=================================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 25000 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better E3-1200 btrfs 64GB . 1911 |==================================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 25000 - Clients: 800 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better E3-1200 btrfs 64GB . 4948 |==================================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 1000 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better E3-1200 btrfs 64GB . 37602 |=================================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 25000 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better E3-1200 btrfs 64GB . 25946 |=================================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 25000 - Clients: 800 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better E3-1200 btrfs 64GB . 23719 |=================================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 25000 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better E3-1200 btrfs 64GB . 29398 |=================================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 25000 - Clients: 1000 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better E3-1200 btrfs 64GB . 23007 |=================================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 25000 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better E3-1200 btrfs 64GB . 4649 |==================================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 25000 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better E3-1200 btrfs 64GB . 34101 |=================================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 25000 - Clients: 5000 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 25000 - Clients: 5000 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better E3-1200 btrfs 64GB . 0.196 |=================================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better E3-1200 btrfs 64GB . 11.58 |=================================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better E3-1200 btrfs 64GB . 0.851 |=================================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better E3-1200 btrfs 64GB . 178 |===================================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better E3-1200 btrfs 64GB . 5.170 |=================================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better E3-1200 btrfs 64GB . 1.864 |=================================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better E3-1200 btrfs 64GB . 4191 |==================================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 1000 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better E3-1200 btrfs 64GB . 167.36 |================================================== Apache CouchDB 3.3.2 Bulk Size: 500 - Inserts: 3000 - Rounds: 30 Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x 1000GB Samsung SSD 980 1TB . 1314.23 |===================================== ClickHouse 22.12.3.5 100M Rows Hits Dataset, Third Run Queries Per Minute, Geo Mean > Higher Is Better 2 x 1000GB Samsung SSD 980 1TB . 57.35 |======================================= ClickHouse 22.12.3.5 100M Rows Hits Dataset, Second Run Queries Per Minute, Geo Mean > Higher Is Better 2 x 1000GB Samsung SSD 980 1TB . 56.93 |======================================= ClickHouse 22.12.3.5 100M Rows Hits Dataset, First Run / Cold Cache Queries Per Minute, Geo Mean > Higher Is Better 2 x 1000GB Samsung SSD 980 1TB . 49.65 |======================================= PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better E3-1200 btrfs 64GB . 5108 |==================================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better E3-1200 btrfs 64GB . 43167 |=================================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better E3-1200 btrfs 64GB . 58758 |=================================================== Apache CouchDB 3.3.2 Bulk Size: 300 - Inserts: 3000 - Rounds: 30 Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x 1000GB Samsung SSD 980 1TB . 848.01 |====================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better E3-1200 btrfs 64GB . 48355 |=================================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better E3-1200 btrfs 64GB . 53649 |=================================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 1000 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better E3-1200 btrfs 64GB . 5976 |==================================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 5000 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 5000 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better MariaDB 11.5 Test: oltp_update_index - Threads: 768 Queries Per Second > Higher Is Better E3-1200 btrfs 64GB . 17051 |=================================================== SQLite 3.41.2 Threads / Copies: 2 Seconds < Lower Is Better i3-7100 btrfs 16GB . 228.84 |================================================== E3-1200 btrfs 64GB . 124.48 |=========================== MariaDB 11.5 Test: oltp_update_non_index - Threads: 768 Queries Per Second > Higher Is Better E3-1200 btrfs 64GB . 14156 |=================================================== MariaDB 11.5 Test: oltp_update_non_index - Threads: 256 Queries Per Second > Higher Is Better E3-1200 btrfs 64GB . 9726 |==================================================== MariaDB 11.5 Test: oltp_update_index - Threads: 512 Queries Per Second > Higher Is Better E3-1200 btrfs 64GB . 16677 |=================================================== MariaDB 11.5 Test: oltp_update_index - Threads: 256 Queries Per Second > Higher Is Better E3-1200 btrfs 64GB . 13817 |=================================================== MariaDB 11.5 Test: oltp_write_only - Threads: 768 Queries Per Second > Higher Is Better E3-1200 btrfs 64GB . 37215 |=================================================== MariaDB 11.5 Test: oltp_update_non_index - Threads: 32 Queries Per Second > Higher Is Better E3-1200 btrfs 64GB . 2799 |==================================================== MariaDB 11.5 Test: oltp_write_only - Threads: 1 Queries Per Second > Higher Is Better E3-1200 btrfs 64GB . 1142 |==================================================== MariaDB 11.5 Test: oltp_read_write - Threads: 1 Queries Per Second > Higher Is Better E3-1200 btrfs 64GB . 3668 |==================================================== MariaDB 11.5 Test: oltp_write_only - Threads: 64 Queries Per Second > Higher Is Better E3-1200 btrfs 64GB . 20716 |=================================================== MariaDB 11.5 Test: oltp_update_index - Threads: 128 Queries Per Second > Higher Is Better E3-1200 btrfs 64GB . 12724 |=================================================== MariaDB 11.5 Test: oltp_read_write - Threads: 256 Queries Per Second > Higher Is Better E3-1200 btrfs 64GB . 48361 |=================================================== MariaDB 11.5 Test: oltp_write_only - Threads: 32 Queries Per Second > Higher Is Better E3-1200 btrfs 64GB . 17955 |=================================================== MariaDB 11.5 Test: oltp_write_only - Threads: 128 Queries Per Second > Higher Is Better E3-1200 btrfs 64GB . 30785 |=================================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better E3-1200 btrfs 64GB . 13.67 |=================================================== MariaDB 11.5 Test: oltp_update_index - Threads: 32 Queries Per Second > Higher Is Better E3-1200 btrfs 64GB . 3469 |==================================================== MariaDB 11.5 Test: oltp_write_only - Threads: 16 Queries Per Second > Higher Is Better E3-1200 btrfs 64GB . 11217 |=================================================== MariaDB 11.5 Test: oltp_read_write - Threads: 128 Queries Per Second > Higher Is Better E3-1200 btrfs 64GB . 45597 |=================================================== MariaDB 11.5 Test: oltp_update_index - Threads: 16 Queries Per Second > Higher Is Better E3-1200 btrfs 64GB . 2230 |==================================================== MariaDB 11.5 Test: oltp_read_write - Threads: 16 Queries Per Second > Higher Is Better E3-1200 btrfs 64GB . 26874 |=================================================== MariaDB 11.5 Test: oltp_read_write - Threads: 64 Queries Per Second > Higher Is Better E3-1200 btrfs 64GB . 40061 |=================================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 1000 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better E3-1200 btrfs 64GB . 171.23 |================================================== DuckDB 1.0 Benchmark: IMDB Seconds < Lower Is Better i3-7100 btrfs 16GB . 413.27 |================================================== E3-1200 btrfs 64GB . 236.14 |============================= Apache CouchDB 3.3.2 Bulk Size: 100 - Inserts: 3000 - Rounds: 30 Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x 1000GB Samsung SSD 980 1TB . 549.47 |====================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 1000 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better E3-1200 btrfs 64GB . 2704.37 |================================================= Timed Linux Kernel Compilation 6.8 Build: defconfig Seconds < Lower Is Better i3-7100 btrfs 16GB . 720.16 |================================================== E3-1200 btrfs 64GB . 348.49 |======================== MariaDB 11.5 Test: oltp_update_index - Threads: 64 Queries Per Second > Higher Is Better E3-1200 btrfs 64GB . 5611 |==================================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better E3-1200 btrfs 64GB . 0.029 |=================================================== MariaDB 11.5 Test: oltp_read_write - Threads: 32 Queries Per Second > Higher Is Better E3-1200 btrfs 64GB . 33874 |=================================================== MariaDB 11.5 Test: oltp_update_non_index - Threads: 64 Queries Per Second > Higher Is Better E3-1200 btrfs 64GB . 4961 |==================================================== MariaDB 11.5 Test: oltp_write_only - Threads: 512 Queries Per Second > Higher Is Better E3-1200 btrfs 64GB . 34103 |=================================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better E3-1200 btrfs 64GB . 0.024 |=================================================== Apache CouchDB 3.3.2 Bulk Size: 500 - Inserts: 1000 - Rounds: 30 Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x 1000GB Samsung SSD 980 1TB . 366.94 |====================================== SQLite 3.41.2 Threads / Copies: 4 Seconds < Lower Is Better i3-7100 btrfs 16GB . 166.92 |================================================== E3-1200 btrfs 64GB . 61.63 |================== OpenCV 4.7 Test: Stitching ms < Lower Is Better E3-1200 btrfs 64GB . 361230 |================================================== DuckDB 1.0 Benchmark: TPC-H Parquet Seconds < Lower Is Better i3-7100 btrfs 16GB . 291.15 |================================================== E3-1200 btrfs 64GB . 211.31 |==================================== BlogBench 1.1 Test: Read Final Score > Higher Is Better 2 x 1000GB Samsung SSD 980 1TB . 1009581 |=================== i3-7100 btrfs 16GB ............. 989264 |================== E3-1200 btrfs 64GB ............. 1980790 |===================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better E3-1200 btrfs 64GB . 7499 |==================================================== OpenSSL 3.3 Algorithm: RSA4096 verify/s > Higher Is Better 2 x 1000GB Samsung SSD 980 1TB . 38283.8 |================== i3-7100 btrfs 16GB ............. 38216.6 |================== E3-1200 btrfs 64GB ............. 78832.0 |===================================== OpenSSL 3.3 Algorithm: RSA4096 sign/s > Higher Is Better 2 x 1000GB Samsung SSD 980 1TB . 583.5 |================== i3-7100 btrfs 16GB ............. 587.2 |=================== E3-1200 btrfs 64GB ............. 1202.8 |====================================== OpenCV 4.7 Test: Graph API ms < Lower Is Better E3-1200 btrfs 64GB . 302725 |================================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 1000 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better E3-1200 btrfs 64GB . 5850 |==================================================== OpenCV 4.7 Test: Image Processing ms < Lower Is Better E3-1200 btrfs 64GB . 141269 |================================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 1000 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better E3-1200 btrfs 64GB . 370 |===================================================== Apache CouchDB 3.3.2 Bulk Size: 300 - Inserts: 1000 - Rounds: 30 Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x 1000GB Samsung SSD 980 1TB . 266.71 |====================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 1000 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better E3-1200 btrfs 64GB . 125.19 |================================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better E3-1200 btrfs 64GB . 34681 |=================================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better E3-1200 btrfs 64GB . 11.83 |=================================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 800 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better E3-1200 btrfs 64GB . 93.50 |=================================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better E3-1200 btrfs 64GB . 25.94 |=================================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better E3-1200 btrfs 64GB . 8.482 |=================================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better E3-1200 btrfs 64GB . 53.68 |=================================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 1000 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better E3-1200 btrfs 64GB . 10.54 |=================================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 800 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better E3-1200 btrfs 64GB . 8.308 |=================================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better E3-1200 btrfs 64GB . 0.343 |=================================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better E3-1200 btrfs 64GB . 1.997 |=================================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better E3-1200 btrfs 64GB . 4.993 |=================================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better E3-1200 btrfs 64GB . 2.398 |=================================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better E3-1200 btrfs 64GB . 0.795 |=================================================== MariaDB 11.5 Test: oltp_update_non_index - Threads: 512 Queries Per Second > Higher Is Better E3-1200 btrfs 64GB . 13424 |=================================================== MariaDB 11.5 Test: oltp_update_non_index - Threads: 128 Queries Per Second > Higher Is Better E3-1200 btrfs 64GB . 8365 |==================================================== MariaDB 11.5 Test: oltp_update_non_index - Threads: 1 Queries Per Second > Higher Is Better E3-1200 btrfs 64GB . 178 |===================================================== MariaDB 11.5 Test: oltp_update_non_index - Threads: 16 Queries Per Second > Higher Is Better E3-1200 btrfs 64GB . 1454 |==================================================== MariaDB 11.5 Test: oltp_read_write - Threads: 512 Queries Per Second > Higher Is Better E3-1200 btrfs 64GB . 50020 |=================================================== MariaDB 11.5 Test: oltp_write_only - Threads: 256 Queries Per Second > Higher Is Better E3-1200 btrfs 64GB . 34277 |=================================================== MariaDB 11.5 Test: oltp_point_select - Threads: 128 Queries Per Second > Higher Is Better E3-1200 btrfs 64GB . 33279 |=================================================== MariaDB 11.5 Test: oltp_point_select - Threads: 16 Queries Per Second > Higher Is Better E3-1200 btrfs 64GB . 36742 |=================================================== MariaDB 11.5 Test: oltp_read_only - Threads: 768 Queries Per Second > Higher Is Better E3-1200 btrfs 64GB . 25595 |=================================================== MariaDB 11.5 Test: oltp_update_index - Threads: 1 Queries Per Second > Higher Is Better E3-1200 btrfs 64GB . 295 |===================================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better E3-1200 btrfs 64GB . 41239 |=================================================== MariaDB 11.5 Test: oltp_point_select - Threads: 1 Queries Per Second > Higher Is Better E3-1200 btrfs 64GB . 23335 |=================================================== MariaDB 11.5 Test: oltp_read_only - Threads: 128 Queries Per Second > Higher Is Better E3-1200 btrfs 64GB . 26895 |=================================================== MariaDB 11.5 Test: oltp_read_only - Threads: 512 Queries Per Second > Higher Is Better E3-1200 btrfs 64GB . 25725 |=================================================== MariaDB 11.5 Test: oltp_point_select - Threads: 512 Queries Per Second > Higher Is Better E3-1200 btrfs 64GB . 30911 |=================================================== MariaDB 11.5 Test: oltp_point_select - Threads: 32 Queries Per Second > Higher Is Better E3-1200 btrfs 64GB . 36062 |=================================================== MariaDB 11.5 Test: oltp_point_select - Threads: 768 Queries Per Second > Higher Is Better E3-1200 btrfs 64GB . 30621 |=================================================== MariaDB 11.5 Test: oltp_point_select - Threads: 256 Queries Per Second > Higher Is Better E3-1200 btrfs 64GB . 31635 |=================================================== MariaDB 11.5 Test: oltp_read_only - Threads: 256 Queries Per Second > Higher Is Better E3-1200 btrfs 64GB . 26126 |=================================================== MariaDB 11.5 Test: oltp_point_select - Threads: 64 Queries Per Second > Higher Is Better E3-1200 btrfs 64GB . 34761 |=================================================== MariaDB 11.5 Test: oltp_read_only - Threads: 32 Queries Per Second > Higher Is Better E3-1200 btrfs 64GB . 29282 |=================================================== MariaDB 11.5 Test: oltp_read_only - Threads: 1 Queries Per Second > Higher Is Better E3-1200 btrfs 64GB . 16849 |=================================================== MariaDB 11.5 Test: oltp_read_only - Threads: 64 Queries Per Second > Higher Is Better E3-1200 btrfs 64GB . 28215 |=================================================== MariaDB 11.5 Test: oltp_read_only - Threads: 16 Queries Per Second > Higher Is Better E3-1200 btrfs 64GB . 29424 |=================================================== x264 2022-02-22 Video Input: Bosphorus 4K Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better i3-7100 btrfs 16GB . 6.04 |========================= E3-1200 btrfs 64GB . 12.36 |=================================================== OpenSSL 3.3 Algorithm: SHA256 byte/s > Higher Is Better 2 x 1000GB Samsung SSD 980 1TB . 661941687 |================= i3-7100 btrfs 16GB ............. 660573593 |================ E3-1200 btrfs 64GB ............. 1362107803 |================================== OpenSSL 3.3 Algorithm: SHA512 byte/s > Higher Is Better 2 x 1000GB Samsung SSD 980 1TB . 734252173 |================ i3-7100 btrfs 16GB ............. 733410263 |================ E3-1200 btrfs 64GB ............. 1514105197 |================================== OpenSSL 3.3 Algorithm: AES-128-GCM byte/s > Higher Is Better 2 x 1000GB Samsung SSD 980 1TB . 11845171430 |================ i3-7100 btrfs 16GB ............. 11837397587 |================ E3-1200 btrfs 64GB ............. 24415684747 |================================= OpenSSL 3.3 Algorithm: ChaCha20-Poly1305 byte/s > Higher Is Better 2 x 1000GB Samsung SSD 980 1TB . 5284551157 |================ i3-7100 btrfs 16GB ............. 5279196407 |================ E3-1200 btrfs 64GB ............. 10891561733 |================================= OpenSSL 3.3 Algorithm: AES-256-GCM byte/s > Higher Is Better 2 x 1000GB Samsung SSD 980 1TB . 8645601420 |================ i3-7100 btrfs 16GB ............. 8637481233 |================ E3-1200 btrfs 64GB ............. 17803308237 |================================= OpenSSL 3.3 Algorithm: ChaCha20 byte/s > Higher Is Better 2 x 1000GB Samsung SSD 980 1TB . 7636266007 |================ i3-7100 btrfs 16GB ............. 7631066270 |================ E3-1200 btrfs 64GB ............. 15723307280 |================================= Redis 7.0.4 Test: SET - Parallel Connections: 500 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better i3-7100 btrfs 16GB . 1691523.68 |========================================= E3-1200 btrfs 64GB . 1908341.93 |============================================== Apache CouchDB 3.3.2 Bulk Size: 100 - Inserts: 1000 - Rounds: 30 Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x 1000GB Samsung SSD 980 1TB . 160.76 |====================================== Redis 7.0.4 Test: SADD - Parallel Connections: 1000 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better i3-7100 btrfs 16GB . 1895961.94 |========================================= E3-1200 btrfs 64GB . 2138863.89 |============================================== DuckDB 1.0 Benchmark: Clickbench Seconds < Lower Is Better i3-7100 btrfs 16GB . 97.56 |=================================================== E3-1200 btrfs 64GB . 52.58 |=========================== OpenCV 4.7 Test: DNN - Deep Neural Network ms < Lower Is Better E3-1200 btrfs 64GB . 37765 |=================================================== Stress-NG 0.17.08 Test: Atomic Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better i3-7100 btrfs 16GB . 258.44 |================================================== E3-1200 btrfs 64GB . 240.35 |=============================================== Redis 7.0.4 Test: SADD - Parallel Connections: 500 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better i3-7100 btrfs 16GB . 1892650.12 |=========================================== E3-1200 btrfs 64GB . 2043270.37 |============================================== Redis 7.0.4 Test: GET - Parallel Connections: 500 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better i3-7100 btrfs 16GB . 2101867.52 |========================================== E3-1200 btrfs 64GB . 2293433.80 |============================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 800 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better E3-1200 btrfs 64GB . 6.964 |=================================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 1000 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better E3-1200 btrfs 64GB . 8.848 |=================================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better E3-1200 btrfs 64GB . 4.228 |=================================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better E3-1200 btrfs 64GB . 2.017 |=================================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better E3-1200 btrfs 64GB . 7.124 |=================================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 800 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better E3-1200 btrfs 64GB . 123.01 |================================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better E3-1200 btrfs 64GB . 1.934 |=================================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better E3-1200 btrfs 64GB . 66.06 |=================================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better E3-1200 btrfs 64GB . 29.10 |=================================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better E3-1200 btrfs 64GB . 0.637 |=================================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better E3-1200 btrfs 64GB . 0.293 |=================================================== Stress-NG 0.17.08 Test: IO_uring Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better i3-7100 btrfs 16GB . 11966.11 |==================== E3-1200 btrfs 64GB . 28714.31 |================================================ PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 800 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better E3-1200 btrfs 64GB . 2096.97 |================================================= PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better E3-1200 btrfs 64GB . 1051.72 |================================================= PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better E3-1200 btrfs 64GB . 466.43 |================================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 1000 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better E3-1200 btrfs 64GB . 7.759 |=================================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better E3-1200 btrfs 64GB . 181.16 |================================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 800 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better E3-1200 btrfs 64GB . 6.153 |=================================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better E3-1200 btrfs 64GB . 3.812 |=================================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better E3-1200 btrfs 64GB . 1.875 |=================================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better E3-1200 btrfs 64GB . 90.97 |=================================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better E3-1200 btrfs 64GB . 0.598 |=================================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better E3-1200 btrfs 64GB . 0.023 |=================================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better E3-1200 btrfs 64GB . 0.280 |=================================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better E3-1200 btrfs 64GB . 1.833 |=================================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 1000 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better E3-1200 btrfs 64GB . 7988 |==================================================== Redis 7.0.4 Test: LPUSH - Parallel Connections: 1000 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better i3-7100 btrfs 16GB . 1595020.09 |=========================================== E3-1200 btrfs 64GB . 1712303.44 |============================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better E3-1200 btrfs 64GB . 8453 |==================================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 800 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better E3-1200 btrfs 64GB . 8557 |==================================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better E3-1200 btrfs 64GB . 9637 |==================================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better E3-1200 btrfs 64GB . 5894 |==================================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better E3-1200 btrfs 64GB . 9315 |==================================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 1000 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better E3-1200 btrfs 64GB . 94915 |=================================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 800 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better E3-1200 btrfs 64GB . 96302 |=================================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better E3-1200 btrfs 64GB . 145755 |================================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better E3-1200 btrfs 64GB . 501 |===================================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better E3-1200 btrfs 64GB . 100144 |================================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better E3-1200 btrfs 64GB . 104255 |================================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better E3-1200 btrfs 64GB . 125756 |================================================== Redis 7.0.4 Test: LPOP - Parallel Connections: 500 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better i3-7100 btrfs 16GB . 2456546.92 |======================================== E3-1200 btrfs 64GB . 2815377.77 |============================================== InfluxDB 1.8.2 Concurrent Streams: 1024 - Batch Size: 10000 - Tags: 2,5000,1 - Points Per Series: 10000 val/sec > Higher Is Better E3-1200 btrfs 64GB . 925683.1 |================================================ InfluxDB 1.8.2 Concurrent Streams: 64 - Batch Size: 10000 - Tags: 2,5000,1 - Points Per Series: 10000 val/sec > Higher Is Better E3-1200 btrfs 64GB . 925043.2 |================================================ InfluxDB 1.8.2 Concurrent Streams: 4 - Batch Size: 10000 - Tags: 2,5000,1 - Points Per Series: 10000 val/sec > Higher Is Better E3-1200 btrfs 64GB . 929703.4 |================================================ x265 3.6 Video Input: Bosphorus 4K Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better i3-7100 btrfs 16GB . 4.34 |============================== E3-1200 btrfs 64GB . 7.43 |==================================================== Redis 7.0.4 Test: SADD - Parallel Connections: 50 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better i3-7100 btrfs 16GB . 1934296.23 |============================================ E3-1200 btrfs 64GB . 2031889.51 |============================================== SQLite Speedtest 3.30 Timed Time - Size 1,000 Seconds < Lower Is Better i3-7100 btrfs 16GB . 105.58 |================================================== E3-1200 btrfs 64GB . 95.72 |============================================= ebizzy 0.3 Records/s > Higher Is Better 2 x 1000GB Samsung SSD 980 1TB . 109410 |====================================== OpenCV 4.7 Test: Features 2D ms < Lower Is Better E3-1200 btrfs 64GB . 98905 |=================================================== Redis 7.0.4 Test: SET - Parallel Connections: 50 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better i3-7100 btrfs 16GB . 1709202.04 |======================================== E3-1200 btrfs 64GB . 1984096.21 |============================================== Redis 7.0.4 Test: LPUSH - Parallel Connections: 500 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better i3-7100 btrfs 16GB . 1540859.96 |========================================== E3-1200 btrfs 64GB . 1693596.99 |============================================== MariaDB 11.5 Test: oltp_read_write - Threads: 768 Queries Per Second > Higher Is Better OpenCV 4.7 Test: Core ms < Lower Is Better E3-1200 btrfs 64GB . 94950 |=================================================== Node.js V8 Web Tooling Benchmark runs/s > Higher Is Better 2 x 1000GB Samsung SSD 980 1TB . 9.29 |======================================== Apache HTTP Server 2.4.56 Concurrent Requests: 1000 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better E3-1200 btrfs 64GB . 23178.94 |================================================ nginx 1.23.2 Connections: 1000 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better E3-1200 btrfs 64GB . 21201.10 |================================================ nginx 1.23.2 Connections: 500 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better E3-1200 btrfs 64GB . 21795.95 |================================================ Apache HTTP Server 2.4.56 Concurrent Requests: 500 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better E3-1200 btrfs 64GB . 24464.18 |================================================ nginx 1.23.2 Connections: 4000 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better E3-1200 btrfs 64GB . 21145.61 |================================================ nginx 1.23.2 Connections: 200 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better E3-1200 btrfs 64GB . 22479.24 |================================================ Apache HTTP Server 2.4.56 Concurrent Requests: 200 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better E3-1200 btrfs 64GB . 34989.25 |================================================ Apache HTTP Server 2.4.56 Concurrent Requests: 100 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better E3-1200 btrfs 64GB . 34786.03 |================================================ Apache HTTP Server 2.4.56 Concurrent Requests: 20 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better E3-1200 btrfs 64GB . 32266.08 |================================================ nginx 1.23.2 Connections: 100 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better E3-1200 btrfs 64GB . 22320.07 |================================================ nginx 1.23.2 Connections: 20 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better E3-1200 btrfs 64GB . 21027.56 |================================================ Redis 7.0.4 Test: GET - Parallel Connections: 1000 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better i3-7100 btrfs 16GB . 2225484.83 |============================================ E3-1200 btrfs 64GB . 2331648.27 |============================================== simdjson 2.0 Throughput Test: PartialTweets GB/s > Higher Is Better 2 x 1000GB Samsung SSD 980 1TB . 2.95 |======================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 800 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better E3-1200 btrfs 64GB . 114873 |================================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 1000 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better E3-1200 btrfs 64GB . 113016 |================================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better E3-1200 btrfs 64GB . 118267 |================================================== Redis 7.0.4 Test: LPOP - Parallel Connections: 1000 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better i3-7100 btrfs 16GB . 1544484.08 |============================= E3-1200 btrfs 64GB . 2468887.41 |============================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better E3-1200 btrfs 64GB . 123970 |================================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better E3-1200 btrfs 64GB . 7019 |==================================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 800 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better E3-1200 btrfs 64GB . 6504 |==================================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better E3-1200 btrfs 64GB . 517 |===================================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better E3-1200 btrfs 64GB . 7570 |==================================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better E3-1200 btrfs 64GB . 8592 |==================================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better E3-1200 btrfs 64GB . 157058 |================================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better E3-1200 btrfs 64GB . 170766 |================================================== simdjson 2.0 Throughput Test: DistinctUserID GB/s > Higher Is Better 2 x 1000GB Samsung SSD 980 1TB . 3.34 |======================================== simdjson 2.0 Throughput Test: TopTweet GB/s > Higher Is Better 2 x 1000GB Samsung SSD 980 1TB . 3.33 |======================================== Zstd Compression 1.5.4 Compression Level: 19 - Decompression Speed MB/s > Higher Is Better i3-7100 btrfs 16GB . 781.9 |====================================== E3-1200 btrfs 64GB . 1036.5 |================================================== Zstd Compression 1.5.4 Compression Level: 19 - Compression Speed MB/s > Higher Is Better i3-7100 btrfs 16GB . 5.27 |============================ E3-1200 btrfs 64GB . 9.90 |==================================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 800 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better E3-1200 btrfs 64GB . 382 |===================================================== Zstd Compression 1.5.4 Compression Level: 19, Long Mode - Decompression Speed MB/s > Higher Is Better i3-7100 btrfs 16GB . 837.3 |========================================= E3-1200 btrfs 64GB . 1026.4 |================================================== Zstd Compression 1.5.4 Compression Level: 19, Long Mode - Compression Speed MB/s > Higher Is Better i3-7100 btrfs 16GB . 4.63 |====================================== E3-1200 btrfs 64GB . 6.26 |==================================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better E3-1200 btrfs 64GB . 476 |===================================================== Perl Benchmarks Test: Pod2html Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x 1000GB Samsung SSD 980 1TB . 0.13728805 |================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better E3-1200 btrfs 64GB . 536 |===================================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 1000 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better E3-1200 btrfs 64GB . 128888 |================================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better E3-1200 btrfs 64GB . 552 |===================================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 800 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better E3-1200 btrfs 64GB . 130021 |================================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better E3-1200 btrfs 64GB . 131156 |================================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better E3-1200 btrfs 64GB . 133360 |================================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better E3-1200 btrfs 64GB . 550 |===================================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better E3-1200 btrfs 64GB . 167280 |================================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better E3-1200 btrfs 64GB . 44106 |=================================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better E3-1200 btrfs 64GB . 178700 |================================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better E3-1200 btrfs 64GB . 546 |===================================================== Memcached 1.6.19 Set To Get Ratio: 1:1 Ops/sec > Higher Is Better i3-7100 btrfs 16GB . 333198.34 |======================= E3-1200 btrfs 64GB . 681562.27 |=============================================== Memcached 1.6.19 Set To Get Ratio: 1:5 Ops/sec > Higher Is Better i3-7100 btrfs 16GB . 260592.49 |======================= E3-1200 btrfs 64GB . 524205.51 |=============================================== Memcached 1.6.19 Set To Get Ratio: 5:1 Ops/sec > Higher Is Better i3-7100 btrfs 16GB . 439083.02 |======================== E3-1200 btrfs 64GB . 851813.79 |=============================================== Memcached 1.6.19 Set To Get Ratio: 1:10 Ops/sec > Higher Is Better i3-7100 btrfs 16GB . 252074.01 |======================= E3-1200 btrfs 64GB . 508101.38 |=============================================== Memcached 1.6.19 Set To Get Ratio: 1:100 Ops/sec > Higher Is Better i3-7100 btrfs 16GB . 245099.38 |======================= E3-1200 btrfs 64GB . 495253.10 |=============================================== Zstd Compression 1.5.4 Compression Level: 12 - Decompression Speed MB/s > Higher Is Better i3-7100 btrfs 16GB . 996.6 |======================================== E3-1200 btrfs 64GB . 1234.9 |================================================== Zstd Compression 1.5.4 Compression Level: 12 - Compression Speed MB/s > Higher Is Better i3-7100 btrfs 16GB . 35.9 |================================== E3-1200 btrfs 64GB . 55.6 |==================================================== Zstd Compression 1.5.4 Compression Level: 3 - Decompression Speed MB/s > Higher Is Better i3-7100 btrfs 16GB . 1049.2 |================================================== Zstd Compression 1.5.4 Compression Level: 3 - Compression Speed MB/s > Higher Is Better i3-7100 btrfs 16GB . 254.0 |===================== E3-1200 btrfs 64GB . 611.1 |=================================================== Zstd Compression 1.5.4 Compression Level: 8, Long Mode - Decompression Speed MB/s > Higher Is Better i3-7100 btrfs 16GB . 1106.5 |============================================= E3-1200 btrfs 64GB . 1230.5 |================================================== Zstd Compression 1.5.4 Compression Level: 8, Long Mode - Compression Speed MB/s > Higher Is Better i3-7100 btrfs 16GB . 93.5 |=============================== E3-1200 btrfs 64GB . 154.2 |=================================================== Redis 7.0.4 Test: LPOP - Parallel Connections: 50 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better i3-7100 btrfs 16GB . 2442966.42 |========================================= E3-1200 btrfs 64GB . 2710434.69 |============================================== Zstd Compression 1.5.4 Compression Level: 8 - Decompression Speed MB/s > Higher Is Better i3-7100 btrfs 16GB . 1107.8 |============================================= E3-1200 btrfs 64GB . 1224.7 |================================================== Zstd Compression 1.5.4 Compression Level: 8 - Compression Speed MB/s > Higher Is Better i3-7100 btrfs 16GB . 94.9 |=============================== E3-1200 btrfs 64GB . 154.9 |=================================================== Zstd Compression 1.5.4 Compression Level: 3, Long Mode - Decompression Speed MB/s > Higher Is Better i3-7100 btrfs 16GB . 1074.3 |============================================== E3-1200 btrfs 64GB . 1158.2 |================================================== Zstd Compression 1.5.4 Compression Level: 3, Long Mode - Compression Speed MB/s > Higher Is Better i3-7100 btrfs 16GB . 236.3 |====================== E3-1200 btrfs 64GB . 553.7 |=================================================== Stream 2013-01-17 Type: Copy MB/s > Higher Is Better i3-7100 btrfs 16GB . 27930.3 |============================================== E3-1200 btrfs 64GB . 29765.3 |================================================= PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 5000 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 5000 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better Stress-NG 0.17.08 Test: Glibc C String Functions Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better E3-1200 btrfs 64GB . 3592900.49 |============================================== simdjson 2.0 Throughput Test: Kostya GB/s > Higher Is Better 2 x 1000GB Samsung SSD 980 1TB . 2.13 |======================================== Perl Benchmarks Test: Interpreter Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x 1000GB Samsung SSD 980 1TB . 0.00149046 |================================== simdjson 2.0 Throughput Test: LargeRandom GB/s > Higher Is Better 2 x 1000GB Samsung SSD 980 1TB . 0.81 |======================================== OpenCV 4.7 Test: Object Detection ms < Lower Is Better E3-1200 btrfs 64GB . 49128 |=================================================== SQLite 3.41.2 Threads / Copies: 1 Seconds < Lower Is Better i3-7100 btrfs 16GB . 44.27 |=================================================== E3-1200 btrfs 64GB . 43.89 |=================================================== Node.js Express HTTP Load Test Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better SQLite 3.30.1 Threads / Copies: 1 Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x 1000GB Samsung SSD 980 1TB . 43.33 |======================================= Redis 7.0.4 Test: LPUSH - Parallel Connections: 50 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better i3-7100 btrfs 16GB . 1583015.13 |========================================== E3-1200 btrfs 64GB . 1717916.17 |============================================== OpenCV 4.7 Test: Video ms < Lower Is Better E3-1200 btrfs 64GB . 36585 |=================================================== Redis 7.0.4 Test: SET - Parallel Connections: 1000 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better i3-7100 btrfs 16GB . 1657372.08 |====================================== E3-1200 btrfs 64GB . 1999001.09 |============================================== Stress-NG 0.17.08 Test: Mutex Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better i3-7100 btrfs 16GB . 320693.96 |===================== E3-1200 btrfs 64GB . 706797.92 |=============================================== Stress-NG 0.17.08 Test: Mixed Scheduler Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better E3-1200 btrfs 64GB . 2734.89 |================================================= Stress-NG 0.17.08 Test: Zlib Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better i3-7100 btrfs 16GB . 217.71 |======================== E3-1200 btrfs 64GB . 448.62 |================================================== Stress-NG 0.17.08 Test: Cloning Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better i3-7100 btrfs 16GB . 388.20 |========================== E3-1200 btrfs 64GB . 745.45 |================================================== Stress-NG 0.17.08 Test: NUMA Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better i3-7100 btrfs 16GB . 32.99 |========================= E3-1200 btrfs 64GB . 67.93 |=================================================== Stress-NG 0.17.08 Test: x86_64 RdRand Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better i3-7100 btrfs 16GB . 3575.34 |=========================================== E3-1200 btrfs 64GB . 4109.78 |================================================= Stress-NG 0.17.08 Test: Pthread Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better i3-7100 btrfs 16GB . 29471.03 |========================= E3-1200 btrfs 64GB . 56847.59 |================================================ Stress-NG 0.17.08 Test: Vector Floating Point Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better E3-1200 btrfs 64GB . 8960.85 |================================================= Stress-NG 0.17.08 Test: Function Call Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better i3-7100 btrfs 16GB . 1365.50 |======================== E3-1200 btrfs 64GB . 2817.04 |================================================= Stress-NG 0.17.08 Test: Floating Point Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better i3-7100 btrfs 16GB . 375.42 |======================== E3-1200 btrfs 64GB . 774.21 |================================================== Stress-NG 0.17.08 Test: Malloc Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better i3-7100 btrfs 16GB . 7255581.31 |=================== E3-1200 btrfs 64GB . 17313971.13 |============================================= Stress-NG 0.17.08 Test: Trigonometric Math Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better E3-1200 btrfs 64GB . 9827.28 |================================================= Stress-NG 0.17.08 Test: Hash Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better i3-7100 btrfs 16GB . 400920.31 |======================= E3-1200 btrfs 64GB . 824999.76 |=============================================== Stress-NG 0.17.08 Test: Memory Copying Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better i3-7100 btrfs 16GB . 564.27 |======================== E3-1200 btrfs 64GB . 1168.12 |================================================= Stress-NG 0.17.08 Test: MEMFD Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better i3-7100 btrfs 16GB . 55.40 |============== E3-1200 btrfs 64GB . 199.72 |================================================== Stress-NG 0.17.08 Test: Matrix 3D Math Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better i3-7100 btrfs 16GB . 706.17 |========================================= E3-1200 btrfs 64GB . 859.45 |================================================== Stress-NG 0.17.08 Test: Vector Shuffle Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better i3-7100 btrfs 16GB . 1389.59 |======================== E3-1200 btrfs 64GB . 2866.21 |================================================= Stress-NG 0.17.08 Test: Power Math Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better i3-7100 btrfs 16GB . 5538.41 |======================= E3-1200 btrfs 64GB . 11404.69 |================================================ Stress-NG 0.17.08 Test: MMAP Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better i3-7100 btrfs 16GB . 64.28 |============ E3-1200 btrfs 64GB . 277.54 |================================================== Stress-NG 0.17.08 Test: System V Message Passing Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better E3-1200 btrfs 64GB . 2915888.02 |============================================== Stress-NG 0.17.08 Test: CPU Stress Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better i3-7100 btrfs 16GB . 4720.75 |======================== E3-1200 btrfs 64GB . 9645.33 |================================================= Stress-NG 0.17.08 Test: Fractal Generator Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better E3-1200 btrfs 64GB . 28.6 |==================================================== Stress-NG 0.17.08 Test: Pipe Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better i3-7100 btrfs 16GB . 1081357.61 |======================= E3-1200 btrfs 64GB . 2185870.46 |============================================== Stress-NG 0.17.08 Test: CPU Cache Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better i3-7100 btrfs 16GB . 797593.98 |=========================== E3-1200 btrfs 64GB . 1353365.74 |============================================== Stress-NG 0.17.08 Test: Forking Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better i3-7100 btrfs 16GB . 11723.45 |========================= E3-1200 btrfs 64GB . 22575.93 |================================================ Stress-NG 0.17.08 Test: Matrix Math Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better i3-7100 btrfs 16GB . 10176.39 |======================= E3-1200 btrfs 64GB . 21060.61 |================================================ Stress-NG 0.17.08 Test: Futex Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better i3-7100 btrfs 16GB . 307498.46 |========================= E3-1200 btrfs 64GB . 589598.74 |=============================================== Stress-NG 0.17.08 Test: Exponential Math Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better E3-1200 btrfs 64GB . 20964.02 |================================================ Stress-NG 0.17.08 Test: Semaphores Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better i3-7100 btrfs 16GB . 2015928.56 |====================== E3-1200 btrfs 64GB . 4135237.27 |============================================== Stress-NG 0.17.08 Test: Glibc Qsort Data Sorting Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better E3-1200 btrfs 64GB . 111.57 |================================================== Stress-NG 0.17.08 Test: Bitonic Integer Sort Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better E3-1200 btrfs 64GB . 40.59 |=================================================== Stress-NG 0.17.08 Test: Fused Multiply-Add Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better E3-1200 btrfs 64GB . 4263844.45 |============================================== Stress-NG 0.17.08 Test: Radix String Sort Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better E3-1200 btrfs 64GB . 38.19 |=================================================== Stress-NG 0.17.08 Test: Context Switching Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better E3-1200 btrfs 64GB . 869589.35 |=============================================== Stress-NG 0.17.08 Test: Wide Vector Math Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better E3-1200 btrfs 64GB . 143435.93 |=============================================== Stress-NG 0.17.08 Test: Logarithmic Math Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better E3-1200 btrfs 64GB . 32014.17 |================================================ Stress-NG 0.17.08 Test: Jpeg Compression Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better E3-1200 btrfs 64GB . 4495.83 |================================================= Stress-NG 0.17.08 Test: Socket Activity Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better E3-1200 btrfs 64GB . 2350.90 |================================================= Stress-NG 0.17.08 Test: Vector Math Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better i3-7100 btrfs 16GB . 8305.46 |======================= E3-1200 btrfs 64GB . 17128.27 |================================================ Stress-NG 0.17.08 Test: Crypto Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better i3-7100 btrfs 16GB . 4648.09 |======================== E3-1200 btrfs 64GB . 9616.65 |================================================= Stress-NG 0.17.08 Test: SENDFILE Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better i3-7100 btrfs 16GB . 30538.95 |======================= E3-1200 btrfs 64GB . 62735.42 |================================================ Stress-NG 0.17.08 Test: AVX-512 VNNI Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better i3-7100 btrfs 16GB . 95909.43 |======================= E3-1200 btrfs 64GB . 196706.17 |=============================================== Stress-NG 0.17.08 Test: AVL Tree Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better i3-7100 btrfs 16GB . 17.26 |========================= E3-1200 btrfs 64GB . 35.73 |=================================================== Stress-NG 0.17.08 Test: Poll Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better i3-7100 btrfs 16GB . 169597.74 |======================= E3-1200 btrfs 64GB . 349095.54 |=============================================== x265 3.6 Video Input: Bosphorus 1080p Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better i3-7100 btrfs 16GB . 18.99 |============================ E3-1200 btrfs 64GB . 34.06 |=================================================== x264 2022-02-22 Video Input: Bosphorus 1080p Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better i3-7100 btrfs 16GB . 25.26 |========================= E3-1200 btrfs 64GB . 51.75 |=================================================== PHPBench 0.8.1 PHP Benchmark Suite Score > Higher Is Better E3-1200 btrfs 64GB . 711216 |================================================== Redis 7.0.4 Test: GET - Parallel Connections: 50 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better i3-7100 btrfs 16GB . 2469880.92 |======================================== E3-1200 btrfs 64GB . 2849574.67 |============================================== PyBench 2018-02-16 Total For Average Test Times Milliseconds < Lower Is Better E3-1200 btrfs 64GB . 999 |===================================================== Apache Spark 3.3 Row Count: 20000000 - Partitions: 2000 Seconds < Lower Is Better Apache Spark 3.3 Row Count: 1000000 - Partitions: 2000 Seconds < Lower Is Better PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 5000 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 5000 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better Apache Spark 3.3 Row Count: 40000000 - Partitions: 100 Seconds < Lower Is Better Apache Spark 3.3 Row Count: 1000000 - Partitions: 100 Seconds < Lower Is Better Apache Spark 3.3 Row Count: 20000000 - Partitions: 500 Seconds < Lower Is Better Apache Spark 3.3 Row Count: 40000000 - Partitions: 2000 Seconds < Lower Is Better Apache Spark 3.3 Row Count: 40000000 - Partitions: 1000 Seconds < Lower Is Better Apache Spark 3.3 Row Count: 1000000 - Partitions: 500 Seconds < Lower Is Better Apache Spark 3.3 Row Count: 10000000 - Partitions: 100 Seconds < Lower Is Better Apache Spark 3.3 Row Count: 10000000 - Partitions: 2000 Seconds < Lower Is Better Apache Spark 3.3 Row Count: 20000000 - Partitions: 1000 Seconds < Lower Is Better Apache Spark 3.3 Row Count: 10000000 - Partitions: 1000 Seconds < Lower Is Better Apache Spark 3.3 Row Count: 40000000 - Partitions: 500 Seconds < Lower Is Better Apache Spark 3.3 Row Count: 1000000 - Partitions: 1000 Seconds < Lower Is Better Apache Spark 3.3 Row Count: 10000000 - Partitions: 500 Seconds < Lower Is Better Apache Spark 3.3 Row Count: 20000000 - Partitions: 100 Seconds < Lower Is Better PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 5000 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 5000 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better etcd 3.5.4 Test: RANGE - Connections: 100 - Clients: 1000 Requests/sec > Higher Is Better etcd 3.5.4 Test: RANGE - Connections: 500 - Clients: 1000 Requests/sec > Higher Is Better etcd 3.5.4 Test: RANGE - Connections: 500 - Clients: 100 Requests/sec > Higher Is Better etcd 3.5.4 Test: RANGE - Connections: 50 - Clients: 1000 Requests/sec > Higher Is Better etcd 3.5.4 Test: RANGE - Connections: 50 - Clients: 100 Requests/sec > Higher Is Better etcd 3.5.4 Test: PUT - Connections: 500 - Clients: 1000 Requests/sec > Higher Is Better etcd 3.5.4 Test: PUT - Connections: 100 - Clients: 1000 Requests/sec > Higher Is Better etcd 3.5.4 Test: RANGE - Connections: 100 - Clients: 100 Requests/sec > Higher Is Better etcd 3.5.4 Test: PUT - Connections: 100 - Clients: 100 Requests/sec > Higher Is Better etcd 3.5.4 Test: PUT - Connections: 500 - Clients: 100 Requests/sec > Higher Is Better etcd 3.5.4 Test: PUT - Connections: 50 - Clients: 1000 Requests/sec > Higher Is Better Glibc Benchmarks 2.39 Benchmark: exp ns < Lower Is Better i3-7100 btrfs 16GB . 22.04 |=================================================== E3-1200 btrfs 64GB . 20.13 |=============================================== Glibc Benchmarks 2.39 Benchmark: sin ns < Lower Is Better i3-7100 btrfs 16GB . 82.01 |=================================================== E3-1200 btrfs 64GB . 75.29 |=============================================== Glibc Benchmarks 2.39 Benchmark: sincos ns < Lower Is Better i3-7100 btrfs 16GB . 48.43 |=================================================== E3-1200 btrfs 64GB . 45.29 |================================================ Glibc Benchmarks 2.39 Benchmark: pow ns < Lower Is Better i3-7100 btrfs 16GB . 46.86 |=================================================== E3-1200 btrfs 64GB . 43.03 |=============================================== Glibc Benchmarks 2.39 Benchmark: cos ns < Lower Is Better i3-7100 btrfs 16GB . 95.67 |=================================================== E3-1200 btrfs 64GB . 88.53 |=============================================== Glibc Benchmarks 2.39 Benchmark: ffsll ns < Lower Is Better i3-7100 btrfs 16GB . 6.65937 |================================================= E3-1200 btrfs 64GB . 6.10841 |============================================= Glibc Benchmarks 2.39 Benchmark: asinh ns < Lower Is Better i3-7100 btrfs 16GB . 39.63 |=================================================== E3-1200 btrfs 64GB . 36.27 |=============================================== Glibc Benchmarks 2.39 Benchmark: sinh ns < Lower Is Better i3-7100 btrfs 16GB . 32.75 |=================================================== E3-1200 btrfs 64GB . 30.18 |=============================================== Glibc Benchmarks 2.39 Benchmark: log2 ns < Lower Is Better i3-7100 btrfs 16GB . 20.31 |=================================================== E3-1200 btrfs 64GB . 18.74 |=============================================== Glibc Benchmarks 2.39 Benchmark: pthread_once ns < Lower Is Better i3-7100 btrfs 16GB . 6.09214 |================================================= E3-1200 btrfs 64GB . 5.59885 |============================================= Glibc Benchmarks 2.39 Benchmark: modf ns < Lower Is Better i3-7100 btrfs 16GB . 8.16278 |================================================= E3-1200 btrfs 64GB . 7.57121 |============================================= Glibc Benchmarks 2.39 Benchmark: sqrt ns < Lower Is Better i3-7100 btrfs 16GB . 8.10593 |================================================= E3-1200 btrfs 64GB . 7.54491 |============================================== Glibc Benchmarks 2.39 Benchmark: tanh ns < Lower Is Better i3-7100 btrfs 16GB . 43.74 |=================================================== E3-1200 btrfs 64GB . 40.27 |=============================================== Glibc Benchmarks 2.39 Benchmark: atanh ns < Lower Is Better i3-7100 btrfs 16GB . 42.80 |=================================================== E3-1200 btrfs 64GB . 39.39 |=============================================== Glibc Benchmarks 2.39 Benchmark: ffs ns < Lower Is Better i3-7100 btrfs 16GB . 6.75303 |================================================= E3-1200 btrfs 64GB . 6.19017 |============================================= PHP Micro Benchmarks Test: Zend micro_bench Seconds < Lower Is Better PHP Micro Benchmarks Test: Zend bench Seconds < Lower Is Better Apache HTTP Server 2.4.56 Concurrent Requests: 4 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better nginx 1.23.2 Connections: 1 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better LevelDB 1.23 Benchmark: Fill Sync Microseconds Per Op < Lower Is Better LevelDB 1.23 Benchmark: Overwrite Microseconds Per Op < Lower Is Better Stream 2013-01-17 Type: Add MB/s > Higher Is Better i3-7100 btrfs 16GB . 21062.2 |============================================== E3-1200 btrfs 64GB . 22213.2 |================================================= Stream 2013-01-17 Type: Triad MB/s > Higher Is Better i3-7100 btrfs 16GB . 21021.9 |============================================== E3-1200 btrfs 64GB . 22176.6 |================================================= Stream 2013-01-17 Type: Scale MB/s > Higher Is Better i3-7100 btrfs 16GB . 18767.3 |============================================== E3-1200 btrfs 64GB . 20162.7 |================================================= BlogBench 1.1 Test: Write Final Score > Higher Is Better 2 x 1000GB Samsung SSD 980 1TB . 1728 |=================== i3-7100 btrfs 16GB ............. 1635 |================== E3-1200 btrfs 64GB ............. 3657 |======================================== LevelDB 1.23 Benchmark: Sequential Fill Microseconds Per Op < Lower Is Better LevelDB 1.23 Benchmark: Random Delete Microseconds Per Op < Lower Is Better LevelDB 1.23 Benchmark: Seek Random Microseconds Per Op < Lower Is Better LevelDB 1.23 Benchmark: Random Read Microseconds Per Op < Lower Is Better LevelDB 1.23 Benchmark: Random Fill Microseconds Per Op < Lower Is Better LevelDB 1.23 Benchmark: Hot Read Microseconds Per Op < Lower Is Better