Desktop machine learning

AMD Ryzen 9 3900X 12-Core testing with a MSI X570-A PRO (MS-7C37) v3.0 (H.70 BIOS) and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 12GB on Ubuntu 23.10 via the Phoronix Test Suite.

Compare your own system(s) to this result file with the Phoronix Test Suite by running the command: phoronix-test-suite benchmark 2405015-VPA1-DESKTOP46
Jump To Table - Results

View

Do Not Show Noisy Results
Do Not Show Results With Incomplete Data
Do Not Show Results With Little Change/Spread
List Notable Results

Limit displaying results to tests within:

CPU Massive 2 Tests
HPC - High Performance Computing 4 Tests
Machine Learning 3 Tests
Programmer / Developer System Benchmarks 2 Tests
Python 5 Tests
Server CPU Tests 3 Tests
Single-Threaded 2 Tests

Statistics

Show Overall Harmonic Mean(s)
Show Overall Geometric Mean
Show Geometric Means Per-Suite/Category
Show Wins / Losses Counts (Pie Chart)
Normalize Results
Remove Outliers Before Calculating Averages

Graph Settings

Force Line Graphs Where Applicable
Convert To Scalar Where Applicable
Prefer Vertical Bar Graphs

Multi-Way Comparison

Condense Multi-Option Tests Into Single Result Graphs

Table

Show Detailed System Result Table

Run Management

Highlight
Result
Hide
Result
Result
Identifier
Performance Per
Dollar
Date
Run
  Test
  Duration
mantic
February 23
  15 Hours, 54 Minutes
mantic-no-omit-framepointer
February 24
  19 Hours, 11 Minutes
noble
April 30
  14 Hours, 21 Minutes
Invert Hiding All Results Option
  16 Hours, 28 Minutes

Only show results where is faster than
Only show results matching title/arguments (delimit multiple options with a comma):
Do not show results matching title/arguments (delimit multiple options with a comma):

Desktop machine learning AMD Ryzen 9 3900X 12-Core testing with a MSI X570-A PRO (MS-7C37) v3.0 (H.70 BIOS) and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 12GB on Ubuntu 23.10 via the Phoronix Test Suite. mantic: Processor: AMD Ryzen 9 3900X 12-Core @ 3.80GHz (12 Cores / 24 Threads), Motherboard: MSI X570-A PRO (MS-7C37) v3.0 (H.70 BIOS), Chipset: AMD Starship/Matisse, Memory: 2 x 16GB DDR4-3200MT/s F4-3200C16-16GVK, Disk: 2000GB Seagate ST2000DM006-2DM1 + 2000GB Western Digital WD20EZAZ-00G + 500GB Samsung SSD 860 + 8002GB Seagate ST8000DM004-2CX1 + 1000GB CT1000BX500SSD1 + 512GB TS512GESD310C, Graphics: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 12GB, Audio: NVIDIA GA104 HD Audio, Monitor: DELL P2314H, Network: Realtek RTL8111/8168/8411 OS: Ubuntu 23.10, Kernel: 6.5.0-9-generic (x86_64), Display Server: X Server 1.21.1.7, Display Driver: NVIDIA, OpenCL: OpenCL 3.0 CUDA 12.2.146, Compiler: GCC 13.2.0 + CUDA 12.2, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 1920x1080 mantic-no-omit-framepointer: Processor: AMD Ryzen 9 3900X 12-Core @ 3.80GHz (12 Cores / 24 Threads), Motherboard: MSI X570-A PRO (MS-7C37) v3.0 (H.70 BIOS), Chipset: AMD Starship/Matisse, Memory: 2 x 16GB DDR4-3200MT/s F4-3200C16-16GVK, Disk: 2000GB Seagate ST2000DM006-2DM1 + 2000GB Western Digital WD20EZAZ-00G + 500GB Samsung SSD 860 + 8002GB Seagate ST8000DM004-2CX1 + 1000GB CT1000BX500SSD1 + 512GB TS512GESD310C, Graphics: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060, Audio: NVIDIA GA104 HD Audio, Monitor: DELL P2314H, Network: Realtek RTL8111/8168/8411 OS: Ubuntu 23.10, Kernel: 6.5.0-9-generic (x86_64), Display Server: X Server 1.21.1.7, Compiler: GCC 13.2.0 + CUDA 12.2, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 1920x1080 noble: Processor: AMD Ryzen 9 3900X 12-Core @ 3.80GHz (12 Cores / 24 Threads), Motherboard: MSI X570-A PRO (MS-7C37) v3.0 (H.70 BIOS), Chipset: AMD Starship/Matisse, Memory: 2 x 16GB DDR4-3200MT/s F4-3200C16-16GVK, Disk: 2000GB Seagate ST2000DM006-2DM1 + 2000GB Western Digital WD20EZAZ-00G + 500GB Samsung SSD 860 + 8002GB Seagate ST8000DM004-2CX1 + 1000GB CT1000BX500SSD1 + 512GB TS512GESD310C, Graphics: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060, Audio: NVIDIA GA104 HD Audio, Monitor: DELL P2314H + U32J59x, Network: Realtek RTL8111/8168/8211/8411 OS: Ubuntu 24.04, Kernel: 6.8.0-31-generic (x86_64), Compiler: GCC 13.2.0, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 1920x1080 PyTorch 2.1 Device: CPU - Batch Size: 1 - Model: ResNet-50 batches/sec > Higher Is Better noble ....................... 32.34 |========================================== mantic ...................... 32.36 |========================================== mantic-no-omit-framepointer . 32.54 |========================================== PyTorch 2.1 Device: CPU - Batch Size: 1 - Model: ResNet-152 batches/sec > Higher Is Better noble ....................... 12.89 |========================================== mantic ...................... 12.72 |========================================= mantic-no-omit-framepointer . 12.78 |========================================== PyTorch 2.1 Device: CPU - Batch Size: 16 - Model: ResNet-50 batches/sec > Higher Is Better noble ....................... 24.43 |========================================== mantic ...................... 24.28 |========================================== mantic-no-omit-framepointer . 24.38 |========================================== PyTorch 2.1 Device: CPU - Batch Size: 32 - Model: ResNet-50 batches/sec > Higher Is Better noble ....................... 24.12 |========================================== mantic ...................... 24.29 |========================================== mantic-no-omit-framepointer . 24.35 |========================================== PyTorch 2.1 Device: CPU - Batch Size: 64 - Model: ResNet-50 batches/sec > Higher Is Better noble ....................... 24.19 |========================================== mantic ...................... 24.24 |========================================== mantic-no-omit-framepointer . 24.40 |========================================== PyTorch 2.1 Device: CPU - Batch Size: 16 - Model: ResNet-152 batches/sec > Higher Is Better noble ....................... 9.88 |=========================================== mantic ...................... 9.88 |=========================================== mantic-no-omit-framepointer . 9.93 |=========================================== PyTorch 2.1 Device: CPU - Batch Size: 256 - Model: ResNet-50 batches/sec > Higher Is Better noble ....................... 24.33 |========================================== mantic ...................... 24.42 |========================================== mantic-no-omit-framepointer . 24.37 |========================================== PyTorch 2.1 Device: CPU - Batch Size: 32 - Model: ResNet-152 batches/sec > Higher Is Better noble ....................... 9.81 |========================================= mantic ...................... 9.84 |========================================= mantic-no-omit-framepointer . 10.00 |========================================== PyTorch 2.1 Device: CPU - Batch Size: 512 - Model: ResNet-50 batches/sec > Higher Is Better noble ....................... 24.30 |========================================== mantic ...................... 24.13 |========================================== mantic-no-omit-framepointer . 24.28 |========================================== PyTorch 2.1 Device: CPU - Batch Size: 64 - Model: ResNet-152 batches/sec > Higher Is Better noble ....................... 9.87 |=========================================== mantic ...................... 9.88 |=========================================== mantic-no-omit-framepointer . 9.91 |=========================================== PyTorch 2.1 Device: CPU - Batch Size: 256 - Model: ResNet-152 batches/sec > Higher Is Better noble ....................... 9.86 |=========================================== mantic ...................... 9.77 |========================================== mantic-no-omit-framepointer . 9.91 |=========================================== PyTorch 2.1 Device: CPU - Batch Size: 512 - Model: ResNet-152 batches/sec > Higher Is Better noble ....................... 9.87 |=========================================== mantic ...................... 9.87 |=========================================== mantic-no-omit-framepointer . 9.80 |=========================================== PyTorch 2.1 Device: CPU - Batch Size: 1 - Model: Efficientnet_v2_l batches/sec > Higher Is Better noble ....................... 7.31 |=========================================== mantic ...................... 7.31 |=========================================== mantic-no-omit-framepointer . 7.32 |=========================================== PyTorch 2.1 Device: CPU - Batch Size: 16 - Model: Efficientnet_v2_l batches/sec > Higher Is Better noble ....................... 5.59 |=========================================== mantic ...................... 5.63 |=========================================== mantic-no-omit-framepointer . 5.64 |=========================================== PyTorch 2.1 Device: CPU - Batch Size: 32 - Model: Efficientnet_v2_l batches/sec > Higher Is Better noble ....................... 5.59 |=========================================== mantic ...................... 5.63 |=========================================== mantic-no-omit-framepointer . 5.64 |=========================================== PyTorch 2.1 Device: CPU - Batch Size: 64 - Model: Efficientnet_v2_l batches/sec > Higher Is Better noble ....................... 5.60 |=========================================== mantic ...................... 5.62 |=========================================== mantic-no-omit-framepointer . 5.65 |=========================================== PyTorch 2.1 Device: CPU - Batch Size: 256 - Model: Efficientnet_v2_l batches/sec > Higher Is Better noble ....................... 5.61 |=========================================== mantic ...................... 5.61 |=========================================== mantic-no-omit-framepointer . 5.64 |=========================================== PyTorch 2.1 Device: CPU - Batch Size: 512 - Model: Efficientnet_v2_l batches/sec > Higher Is Better noble ....................... 5.60 |=========================================== mantic ...................... 5.61 |=========================================== mantic-no-omit-framepointer . 5.65 |=========================================== PyTorch 2.1 Device: NVIDIA CUDA GPU - Batch Size: 1 - Model: ResNet-50 batches/sec > Higher Is Better mantic ...................... 210.88 |========================================= mantic-no-omit-framepointer . 211.46 |========================================= PyTorch 2.1 Device: NVIDIA CUDA GPU - Batch Size: 1 - Model: ResNet-152 batches/sec > Higher Is Better mantic ...................... 73.91 |========================================== mantic-no-omit-framepointer . 72.27 |========================================= PyTorch 2.1 Device: NVIDIA CUDA GPU - Batch Size: 16 - Model: ResNet-50 batches/sec > Higher Is Better mantic ...................... 200.30 |========================================= mantic-no-omit-framepointer . 200.17 |========================================= PyTorch 2.1 Device: NVIDIA CUDA GPU - Batch Size: 32 - Model: ResNet-50 batches/sec > Higher Is Better mantic ...................... 199.46 |======================================== mantic-no-omit-framepointer . 202.68 |========================================= PyTorch 2.1 Device: NVIDIA CUDA GPU - Batch Size: 64 - Model: ResNet-50 batches/sec > Higher Is Better mantic ...................... 201.41 |======================================== mantic-no-omit-framepointer . 205.95 |========================================= PyTorch 2.1 Device: NVIDIA CUDA GPU - Batch Size: 16 - Model: ResNet-152 batches/sec > Higher Is Better mantic ...................... 73.01 |========================================== mantic-no-omit-framepointer . 72.24 |========================================== PyTorch 2.1 Device: NVIDIA CUDA GPU - Batch Size: 256 - Model: ResNet-50 batches/sec > Higher Is Better mantic ...................... 202.72 |========================================= mantic-no-omit-framepointer . 203.22 |========================================= PyTorch 2.1 Device: NVIDIA CUDA GPU - Batch Size: 32 - Model: ResNet-152 batches/sec > Higher Is Better mantic ...................... 74.15 |========================================== mantic-no-omit-framepointer . 73.36 |========================================== PyTorch 2.1 Device: NVIDIA CUDA GPU - Batch Size: 512 - Model: ResNet-50 batches/sec > Higher Is Better mantic ...................... 203.18 |========================================= mantic-no-omit-framepointer . 201.14 |========================================= PyTorch 2.1 Device: NVIDIA CUDA GPU - Batch Size: 64 - Model: ResNet-152 batches/sec > Higher Is Better mantic ...................... 71.81 |========================================= mantic-no-omit-framepointer . 73.65 |========================================== PyTorch 2.1 Device: NVIDIA CUDA GPU - Batch Size: 256 - Model: ResNet-152 batches/sec > Higher Is Better mantic ...................... 71.74 |========================================= mantic-no-omit-framepointer . 72.91 |========================================== PyTorch 2.1 Device: NVIDIA CUDA GPU - Batch Size: 512 - Model: ResNet-152 batches/sec > Higher Is Better mantic ...................... 72.31 |========================================= mantic-no-omit-framepointer . 73.75 |========================================== PyTorch 2.1 Device: NVIDIA CUDA GPU - Batch Size: 1 - Model: Efficientnet_v2_l batches/sec > Higher Is Better mantic ...................... 39.35 |========================================== mantic-no-omit-framepointer . 37.29 |======================================== PyTorch 2.1 Device: NVIDIA CUDA GPU - Batch Size: 16 - Model: Efficientnet_v2_l batches/sec > Higher Is Better mantic ...................... 38.95 |========================================== mantic-no-omit-framepointer . 36.10 |======================================= PyTorch 2.1 Device: NVIDIA CUDA GPU - Batch Size: 32 - Model: Efficientnet_v2_l batches/sec > Higher Is Better mantic ...................... 37.71 |========================================== mantic-no-omit-framepointer . 37.16 |========================================= PyTorch 2.1 Device: NVIDIA CUDA GPU - Batch Size: 64 - Model: Efficientnet_v2_l batches/sec > Higher Is Better mantic ...................... 37.88 |========================================== mantic-no-omit-framepointer . 37.24 |========================================= PyTorch 2.1 Device: NVIDIA CUDA GPU - Batch Size: 256 - Model: Efficientnet_v2_l batches/sec > Higher Is Better mantic ...................... 37.36 |========================================== mantic-no-omit-framepointer . 36.60 |========================================= PyTorch 2.1 Device: NVIDIA CUDA GPU - Batch Size: 512 - Model: Efficientnet_v2_l batches/sec > Higher Is Better mantic ...................... 37.43 |========================================== mantic-no-omit-framepointer . 37.22 |========================================== Numpy Benchmark Score > Higher Is Better mantic ...................... 426.28 |========================================= mantic-no-omit-framepointer . 428.61 |========================================= noble ....................... 430.83 |========================================= PyBench 2018-02-16 Total For Average Test Times Milliseconds < Lower Is Better mantic ...................... 774 |========================================= mantic-no-omit-framepointer . 790 |========================================= noble ....................... 839 |============================================ PyPerformance 1.0.0 Benchmark: go Milliseconds < Lower Is Better mantic ...................... 129 |=========================================== mantic-no-omit-framepointer . 131 |============================================ noble ....................... 121 |========================================= PyPerformance 1.0.0 Benchmark: 2to3 Milliseconds < Lower Is Better mantic ...................... 221 |=========================================== mantic-no-omit-framepointer . 224 |============================================ PyPerformance 1.0.0 Benchmark: chaos Milliseconds < Lower Is Better mantic ...................... 62.8 |========================================== mantic-no-omit-framepointer . 63.6 |=========================================== PyPerformance 1.0.0 Benchmark: float Milliseconds < Lower Is Better mantic ...................... 67.4 |=========================================== mantic-no-omit-framepointer . 66.9 |=========================================== PyPerformance 1.0.0 Benchmark: nbody Milliseconds < Lower Is Better mantic ...................... 76.2 |========================================== mantic-no-omit-framepointer . 77.1 |=========================================== PyPerformance 1.0.0 Benchmark: pathlib Milliseconds < Lower Is Better mantic ...................... 19.7 |========================================== mantic-no-omit-framepointer . 20.2 |=========================================== PyPerformance 1.0.0 Benchmark: raytrace Milliseconds < Lower Is Better mantic ...................... 262 |========================================== mantic-no-omit-framepointer . 274 |============================================ PyPerformance 1.0.0 Benchmark: json_loads Milliseconds < Lower Is Better mantic ...................... 19.5 |===================================== mantic-no-omit-framepointer . 20.8 |======================================= noble ....................... 22.8 |=========================================== PyPerformance 1.0.0 Benchmark: crypto_pyaes Milliseconds < Lower Is Better mantic ...................... 65.1 |========================================== mantic-no-omit-framepointer . 66.6 |=========================================== PyPerformance 1.0.0 Benchmark: regex_compile Milliseconds < Lower Is Better mantic ...................... 116 |=========================================== mantic-no-omit-framepointer . 120 |============================================ PyPerformance 1.0.0 Benchmark: python_startup Milliseconds < Lower Is Better mantic ...................... 7.61 |===================================== mantic-no-omit-framepointer . 7.64 |====================================== noble ....................... 8.76 |=========================================== PyPerformance 1.0.0 Benchmark: django_template Milliseconds < Lower Is Better mantic ...................... 28.5 |========================================== mantic-no-omit-framepointer . 29.5 |=========================================== PyPerformance 1.0.0 Benchmark: pickle_pure_python Milliseconds < Lower Is Better mantic ...................... 259 |=========================================== mantic-no-omit-framepointer . 263 |============================================ PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: Numpy - Project Size: 16384 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better mantic ...................... 0.003 |========================================== mantic-no-omit-framepointer . 0.003 |========================================== noble ....................... 0.003 |========================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: Numpy - Project Size: 16384 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better mantic ...................... 0.009 |========================================== mantic-no-omit-framepointer . 0.008 |===================================== noble ....................... 0.009 |========================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: Numpy - Project Size: 65536 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better mantic ...................... 0.015 |======================================= mantic-no-omit-framepointer . 0.015 |======================================= noble ....................... 0.016 |========================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: Numpy - Project Size: 65536 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better mantic ...................... 0.032 |========================================= mantic-no-omit-framepointer . 0.032 |========================================= noble ....................... 0.033 |========================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: GPU - Backend: Numpy - Project Size: 16384 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better mantic ...................... 0.003 |========================================== mantic-no-omit-framepointer . 0.002 |============================ noble ....................... 0.003 |========================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: GPU - Backend: Numpy - Project Size: 16384 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better mantic ...................... 0.009 |========================================== mantic-no-omit-framepointer . 0.008 |===================================== noble ....................... 0.008 |===================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: GPU - Backend: Numpy - Project Size: 65536 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better mantic ...................... 0.015 |========================================== mantic-no-omit-framepointer . 0.015 |========================================== noble ....................... 0.015 |========================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: GPU - Backend: Numpy - Project Size: 65536 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better mantic ...................... 0.033 |========================================= mantic-no-omit-framepointer . 0.033 |========================================= noble ....................... 0.034 |========================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: Numpy - Project Size: 262144 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better mantic ...................... 0.061 |========================================== mantic-no-omit-framepointer . 0.058 |======================================== noble ....................... 0.060 |========================================= PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: Numpy - Project Size: 262144 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better mantic ...................... 0.131 |========================================= mantic-no-omit-framepointer . 0.132 |========================================== noble ....................... 0.133 |========================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: GPU - Backend: Numpy - Project Size: 262144 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better mantic ...................... 0.062 |========================================== mantic-no-omit-framepointer . 0.058 |======================================= noble ....................... 0.061 |========================================= PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: GPU - Backend: Numpy - Project Size: 262144 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better mantic ...................... 0.131 |======================================== mantic-no-omit-framepointer . 0.128 |======================================== noble ....................... 0.136 |========================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: Numpy - Project Size: 1048576 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better mantic ...................... 0.263 |========================================== mantic-no-omit-framepointer . 0.262 |========================================== noble ....................... 0.261 |========================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: Numpy - Project Size: 1048576 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better mantic ...................... 0.619 |========================================= mantic-no-omit-framepointer . 0.618 |========================================= noble ....................... 0.631 |========================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: Numpy - Project Size: 4194304 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better mantic ...................... 1.402 |========================================= mantic-no-omit-framepointer . 1.405 |========================================= noble ....................... 1.436 |========================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: Numpy - Project Size: 4194304 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better mantic ...................... 2.670 |========================================= mantic-no-omit-framepointer . 2.626 |========================================= noble ....................... 2.720 |========================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: GPU - Backend: Numpy - Project Size: 1048576 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better mantic ...................... 0.263 |========================================== mantic-no-omit-framepointer . 0.260 |========================================== noble ....................... 0.262 |========================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: GPU - Backend: Numpy - Project Size: 1048576 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better mantic ...................... 0.631 |========================================== mantic-no-omit-framepointer . 0.622 |========================================= noble ....................... 0.630 |========================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: GPU - Backend: Numpy - Project Size: 4194304 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better mantic ...................... 1.422 |========================================= mantic-no-omit-framepointer . 1.411 |========================================= noble ....................... 1.446 |========================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: GPU - Backend: Numpy - Project Size: 4194304 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better mantic ...................... 2.662 |========================================== mantic-no-omit-framepointer . 2.620 |========================================= noble ....................... 2.668 |========================================== Scikit-Learn 1.2.2 Benchmark: GLM Seconds < Lower Is Better mantic ...................... 293.60 |========================================= mantic-no-omit-framepointer . 295.10 |========================================= noble ....................... 269.81 |===================================== Scikit-Learn 1.2.2 Benchmark: SAGA Seconds < Lower Is Better mantic ...................... 868.02 |========================================= mantic-no-omit-framepointer . 873.82 |========================================= noble ....................... 869.37 |========================================= Scikit-Learn 1.2.2 Benchmark: Tree Seconds < Lower Is Better mantic ...................... 48.34 |====================================== mantic-no-omit-framepointer . 52.97 |========================================== noble ....................... 47.03 |===================================== Scikit-Learn 1.2.2 Benchmark: Lasso Seconds < Lower Is Better mantic ...................... 511.85 |========================================= mantic-no-omit-framepointer . 509.54 |========================================= noble ....................... 345.40 |============================ Scikit-Learn 1.2.2 Benchmark: Sparsify Seconds < Lower Is Better mantic ...................... 127.28 |========================================= mantic-no-omit-framepointer . 125.44 |======================================== noble ....................... 125.07 |======================================== Scikit-Learn 1.2.2 Benchmark: Plot Ward Seconds < Lower Is Better mantic ...................... 57.82 |========================================== mantic-no-omit-framepointer . 57.55 |========================================== noble ....................... 56.13 |========================================= Scikit-Learn 1.2.2 Benchmark: MNIST Dataset Seconds < Lower Is Better mantic ...................... 65.76 |========================================== mantic-no-omit-framepointer . 65.88 |========================================== noble ....................... 65.42 |========================================== Scikit-Learn 1.2.2 Benchmark: Plot Neighbors Seconds < Lower Is Better mantic ...................... 147.75 |========================================= mantic-no-omit-framepointer . 142.45 |======================================== noble ....................... 142.16 |======================================= Scikit-Learn 1.2.2 Benchmark: SGD Regression Seconds < Lower Is Better mantic ...................... 106.32 |========================================= mantic-no-omit-framepointer . 107.53 |========================================= noble ....................... 78.88 |============================== Scikit-Learn 1.2.2 Benchmark: SGDOneClassSVM Seconds < Lower Is Better mantic ...................... 379.74 |======================================== mantic-no-omit-framepointer . 382.61 |========================================= noble ....................... 385.38 |========================================= Scikit-Learn 1.2.2 Benchmark: Isolation Forest Seconds < Lower Is Better mantic ...................... 289.37 |=================================== mantic-no-omit-framepointer . 336.37 |========================================= noble ....................... 314.03 |====================================== Scikit-Learn 1.2.2 Benchmark: Text Vectorizers Seconds < Lower Is Better mantic ...................... 60.81 |====================================== mantic-no-omit-framepointer . 63.88 |======================================== noble ....................... 66.39 |========================================== Scikit-Learn 1.2.2 Benchmark: Plot Hierarchical Seconds < Lower Is Better mantic ...................... 211.29 |========================================= mantic-no-omit-framepointer . 208.39 |======================================== noble ....................... 207.10 |======================================== Scikit-Learn 1.2.2 Benchmark: Plot OMP vs. LARS Seconds < Lower Is Better mantic ...................... 91.50 |========================================== mantic-no-omit-framepointer . 92.58 |========================================== noble ....................... 68.17 |=============================== Scikit-Learn 1.2.2 Benchmark: Feature Expansions Seconds < Lower Is Better mantic ...................... 131.28 |======================================== mantic-no-omit-framepointer . 133.09 |========================================= noble ....................... 133.14 |========================================= Scikit-Learn 1.2.2 Benchmark: LocalOutlierFactor Seconds < Lower Is Better mantic ...................... 53.46 |======================================== mantic-no-omit-framepointer . 56.75 |========================================== noble ....................... 54.29 |======================================== Scikit-Learn 1.2.2 Benchmark: TSNE MNIST Dataset Seconds < Lower Is Better mantic ...................... 236.87 |================================== mantic-no-omit-framepointer . 236.79 |================================== noble ....................... 285.82 |========================================= Scikit-Learn 1.2.2 Benchmark: Isotonic / Logistic Seconds < Lower Is Better mantic ...................... 1470.81 |=================================== mantic-no-omit-framepointer . 1471.83 |=================================== noble ....................... 1684.55 |======================================== Scikit-Learn 1.2.2 Benchmark: Plot Incremental PCA Seconds < Lower Is Better mantic ...................... 31.01 |========================================== mantic-no-omit-framepointer . 31.06 |========================================== noble ....................... 30.62 |========================================= Scikit-Learn 1.2.2 Benchmark: Hist Gradient Boosting Seconds < Lower Is Better mantic ...................... 109.98 |====================================== mantic-no-omit-framepointer . 111.26 |======================================= noble ....................... 117.41 |========================================= Scikit-Learn 1.2.2 Benchmark: Sample Without Replacement Seconds < Lower Is Better mantic ...................... 158.26 |==================================== mantic-no-omit-framepointer . 161.46 |===================================== noble ....................... 179.64 |========================================= Scikit-Learn 1.2.2 Benchmark: Covertype Dataset Benchmark Seconds < Lower Is Better mantic ...................... 376.15 |======================================== mantic-no-omit-framepointer . 370.69 |======================================== noble ....................... 381.45 |========================================= Scikit-Learn 1.2.2 Benchmark: Hist Gradient Boosting Adult Seconds < Lower Is Better mantic ...................... 103.50 |====================================== mantic-no-omit-framepointer . 105.65 |====================================== noble ....................... 112.71 |========================================= Scikit-Learn 1.2.2 Benchmark: Isotonic / Perturbed Logarithm Seconds < Lower Is Better mantic ...................... 1788.26 |==================================== mantic-no-omit-framepointer . 1828.30 |===================================== noble ....................... 1963.77 |======================================== Scikit-Learn 1.2.2 Benchmark: Hist Gradient Boosting Threading Seconds < Lower Is Better mantic ...................... 110.22 |========================================= mantic-no-omit-framepointer . 110.37 |========================================= noble ....................... 111.55 |========================================= Scikit-Learn 1.2.2 Benchmark: 20 Newsgroups / Logistic Regression Seconds < Lower Is Better mantic ...................... 41.52 |========================================== mantic-no-omit-framepointer . 41.73 |========================================== noble ....................... 41.91 |========================================== Scikit-Learn 1.2.2 Benchmark: Plot Polynomial Kernel Approximation Seconds < Lower Is Better mantic ...................... 150.73 |========================================= mantic-no-omit-framepointer . 150.38 |========================================= noble ....................... 145.36 |======================================== Scikit-Learn 1.2.2 Benchmark: Hist Gradient Boosting Categorical Only Seconds < Lower Is Better mantic ...................... 18.58 |======================================= mantic-no-omit-framepointer . 18.87 |======================================== noble ....................... 19.93 |========================================== Scikit-Learn 1.2.2 Benchmark: Kernel PCA Solvers / Time vs. N Samples Seconds < Lower Is Better mantic ...................... 72.54 |========================================== mantic-no-omit-framepointer . 72.91 |========================================== noble ....................... 70.02 |======================================== Scikit-Learn 1.2.2 Benchmark: Kernel PCA Solvers / Time vs. N Components Seconds < Lower Is Better mantic ...................... 37.24 |========================================= mantic-no-omit-framepointer . 37.89 |========================================== noble ....................... 37.11 |========================================= Scikit-Learn 1.2.2 Benchmark: Sparse Random Projections / 100 Iterations Seconds < Lower Is Better mantic ...................... 613.55 |====================================== mantic-no-omit-framepointer . 631.07 |======================================= noble ....................... 663.95 |========================================= PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: JAX - Project Size: 16384 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: JAX - Project Size: 16384 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: JAX - Project Size: 65536 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: JAX - Project Size: 65536 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: GPU - Backend: JAX - Project Size: 16384 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: GPU - Backend: JAX - Project Size: 16384 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: GPU - Backend: JAX - Project Size: 65536 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: GPU - Backend: JAX - Project Size: 65536 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: JAX - Project Size: 262144 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: JAX - Project Size: 262144 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: GPU - Backend: JAX - Project Size: 262144 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: GPU - Backend: JAX - Project Size: 262144 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: JAX - Project Size: 1048576 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: JAX - Project Size: 1048576 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: JAX - Project Size: 4194304 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: JAX - Project Size: 4194304 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: Numba - Project Size: 16384 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: Numba - Project Size: 16384 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: Numba - Project Size: 65536 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: Numba - Project Size: 65536 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: GPU - Backend: JAX - Project Size: 1048576 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: GPU - Backend: JAX - Project Size: 1048576 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: GPU - Backend: JAX - Project Size: 4194304 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: GPU - Backend: JAX - Project Size: 4194304 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: GPU - Backend: Numba - Project Size: 16384 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: GPU - Backend: Numba - Project Size: 16384 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: GPU - Backend: Numba - Project Size: 65536 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: GPU - Backend: Numba - Project Size: 65536 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: Aesara - Project Size: 16384 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: Aesara - Project Size: 16384 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: Aesara - Project Size: 65536 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: Aesara - Project Size: 65536 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: Numba - Project Size: 262144 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: Numba - Project Size: 262144 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: GPU - Backend: Aesara - Project Size: 16384 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: GPU - Backend: Aesara - Project Size: 16384 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: GPU - Backend: Aesara - Project Size: 65536 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: GPU - Backend: Aesara - Project Size: 65536 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: GPU - Backend: Numba - Project Size: 262144 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: GPU - Backend: Numba - Project Size: 262144 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: Aesara - Project Size: 262144 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: Aesara - Project Size: 262144 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: Numba - Project Size: 1048576 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: Numba - Project Size: 1048576 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: Numba - Project Size: 4194304 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: Numba - Project Size: 4194304 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: PyTorch - Project Size: 16384 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: PyTorch - Project Size: 16384 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: PyTorch - Project Size: 65536 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: PyTorch - Project Size: 65536 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: GPU - Backend: Aesara - Project Size: 262144 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: GPU - Backend: Aesara - Project Size: 262144 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: GPU - Backend: Numba - Project Size: 1048576 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: GPU - Backend: Numba - Project Size: 1048576 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: GPU - Backend: Numba - Project Size: 4194304 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: GPU - Backend: Numba - Project Size: 4194304 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: GPU - Backend: PyTorch - Project Size: 16384 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: GPU - Backend: PyTorch - Project Size: 16384 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: GPU - Backend: PyTorch - Project Size: 65536 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: GPU - Backend: PyTorch - Project Size: 65536 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: Aesara - Project Size: 1048576 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: Aesara - Project Size: 1048576 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: Aesara - Project Size: 4194304 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: Aesara - Project Size: 4194304 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: PyTorch - Project Size: 262144 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: PyTorch - Project Size: 262144 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: GPU - Backend: Aesara - Project Size: 1048576 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: GPU - Backend: Aesara - Project Size: 1048576 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: GPU - Backend: Aesara - Project Size: 4194304 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: GPU - Backend: Aesara - Project Size: 4194304 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: GPU - Backend: PyTorch - Project Size: 262144 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: GPU - Backend: PyTorch - Project Size: 262144 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: PyTorch - Project Size: 1048576 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: PyTorch - Project Size: 1048576 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: PyTorch - Project Size: 4194304 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: PyTorch - Project Size: 4194304 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: GPU - Backend: PyTorch - Project Size: 1048576 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: GPU - Backend: PyTorch - Project Size: 1048576 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: GPU - Backend: PyTorch - Project Size: 4194304 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: GPU - Backend: PyTorch - Project Size: 4194304 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: TensorFlow - Project Size: 16384 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: TensorFlow - Project Size: 16384 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: TensorFlow - Project Size: 65536 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: TensorFlow - Project Size: 65536 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: GPU - Backend: TensorFlow - Project Size: 16384 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: GPU - Backend: TensorFlow - Project Size: 16384 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: GPU - Backend: TensorFlow - Project Size: 65536 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: GPU - Backend: TensorFlow - Project Size: 65536 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: TensorFlow - Project Size: 262144 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: TensorFlow - Project Size: 262144 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: GPU - Backend: TensorFlow - Project Size: 262144 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: GPU - Backend: TensorFlow - Project Size: 262144 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: TensorFlow - Project Size: 1048576 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: TensorFlow - Project Size: 1048576 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: TensorFlow - Project Size: 4194304 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: TensorFlow - Project Size: 4194304 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: GPU - Backend: TensorFlow - Project Size: 1048576 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: GPU - Backend: TensorFlow - Project Size: 1048576 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: GPU - Backend: TensorFlow - Project Size: 4194304 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: GPU - Backend: TensorFlow - Project Size: 4194304 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better Scikit-Learn 1.2.2 Benchmark: Glmnet Seconds < Lower Is Better Scikit-Learn 1.2.2 Benchmark: Plot Lasso Path Seconds < Lower Is Better Scikit-Learn 1.2.2 Benchmark: Plot Fast KMeans Seconds < Lower Is Better Scikit-Learn 1.2.2 Benchmark: Plot Parallel Pairwise Seconds < Lower Is Better Scikit-Learn 1.2.2 Benchmark: Isotonic / Pathological Seconds < Lower Is Better Scikit-Learn 1.2.2 Benchmark: RCV1 Logreg Convergencet Seconds < Lower Is Better Scikit-Learn 1.2.2 Benchmark: Plot Singular Value Decomposition Seconds < Lower Is Better