JHLT3.1 x86 x86: Processor: 2 x Intel Xeon Silver 4310 @ 3.30GHz (24 Cores / 48 Threads), Motherboard: Inspur NF5280M6 (06.00.03 BIOS), Chipset: Intel Device 0998, Memory: 2 x 32 GB DDR4-3200MT/s Samsung M393A4K40EB3-CWE, Disk: 600GB INSPUR + 31GB SanDisk 3.2Gen1, Graphics: ASPEED, Monitor: VGA, Network: 4 x Intel I350 OS: JHLT 3.1, Kernel: 3.10.0-1062.lt3.x86_64 (x86_64), Compiler: GCC 4.8.5 20150623, File-System: ext3, Screen Resolution: 1280x1024 ctx_clock Context Switch Time Clocks < Lower Is Better x86 . 213 |==================================================================== Stress-NG 0.16.04 Test: System V Message Passing Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better x86 . 5010829.33 |============================================================= Stress-NG 0.16.04 Test: Glibc Qsort Data Sorting Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better x86 . 428.67 |================================================================= Stress-NG 0.16.04 Test: Glibc C String Functions Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better x86 . 8508754.25 |============================================================= Stress-NG 0.16.04 Test: Vector Floating Point Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better x86 . 25033.20 |=============================================================== Stress-NG 0.16.04 Test: Fused Multiply-Add Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better x86 . 9986742.85 |============================================================= Stress-NG 0.16.04 Test: Context Switching Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better x86 . 10775928.91 |============================================================ Stress-NG 0.16.04 Test: Wide Vector Math Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better x86 . 200905.44 |============================================================== Stress-NG 0.16.04 Test: Socket Activity Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better x86 . 13204.25 |=============================================================== Stress-NG 0.16.04 Test: Mixed Scheduler Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better x86 . 44103.12 |=============================================================== Stress-NG 0.16.04 Test: Vector Shuffle Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better x86 . 12986.31 |=============================================================== Stress-NG 0.16.04 Test: Memory Copying Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better x86 . 5148.18 |================================================================ Stress-NG 0.16.04 Test: Matrix 3D Math Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better x86 . 1384.98 |================================================================ Stress-NG 0.16.04 Test: Floating Point Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better x86 . 5735.90 |================================================================ Stress-NG 0.16.04 Test: x86_64 RdRand Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better x86 . 664100.53 |============================================================== Stress-NG 0.16.04 Test: Function Call Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better x86 . 9914.48 |================================================================ Stress-NG 0.16.04 Test: AVX-512 VNNI Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better x86 . 339866.46 |============================================================== Stress-NG 0.16.04 Test: Vector Math Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better x86 . 53675.30 |=============================================================== Stress-NG 0.16.04 Test: Matrix Math Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better x86 . 92234.49 |=============================================================== Stress-NG 0.16.04 Test: Semaphores Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better x86 . 47766739.18 |============================================================ Stress-NG 0.16.04 Test: CPU Stress Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better x86 . 31290.04 |=============================================================== Stress-NG 0.16.04 Test: SENDFILE Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better x86 . 521097.55 |============================================================== Stress-NG 0.16.04 Test: AVL Tree Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better x86 . 111.15 |================================================================= Stress-NG 0.16.04 Test: Pthread Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better x86 . 80161.11 |=============================================================== Stress-NG 0.16.04 Test: Forking Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better x86 . 6456.58 |================================================================ Stress-NG 0.16.04 Test: Cloning Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better x86 . 229.26 |================================================================= Stress-NG 0.16.04 Test: Malloc Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better x86 . 38997647.62 |============================================================ Stress-NG 0.16.04 Test: Crypto Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better x86 . 22264.58 |=============================================================== Stress-NG 0.16.04 Test: Atomic Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better x86 . 122.60 |================================================================= Stress-NG 0.16.04 Test: Mutex Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better x86 . 601511.30 |============================================================== Stress-NG 0.16.04 Test: Zlib Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better x86 . 1382.72 |================================================================ Stress-NG 0.16.04 Test: Poll Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better x86 . 7786109.02 |============================================================= Stress-NG 0.16.04 Test: Pipe Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better x86 . 20443164.27 |============================================================ Stress-NG 0.16.04 Test: MMAP Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better x86 . 1301.33 |================================================================ Stress-NG 0.16.04 Test: Hash Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better x86 . 3283663.54 |============================================================= SQLite Speedtest 3.30 Timed Time - Size 1,000 Seconds < Lower Is Better x86 . 91.85 |================================================================== Hackbench Count: 32 - Type: Process Seconds < Lower Is Better x86 . 29.26 |================================================================== Hackbench Count: 16 - Type: Process Seconds < Lower Is Better x86 . 15.87 |================================================================== Hackbench Count: 4 - Type: Process Seconds < Lower Is Better x86 . 5.133 |================================================================== Hackbench Count: 2 - Type: Process Seconds < Lower Is Better x86 . 2.892 |================================================================== Hackbench Count: 1 - Type: Process Seconds < Lower Is Better x86 . 2.763 |================================================================== Hackbench Count: 4 - Type: Thread Seconds < Lower Is Better x86 . 5.512 |================================================================== Hackbench Count: 2 - Type: Thread Seconds < Lower Is Better x86 . 3.139 |================================================================== Hackbench Count: 1 - Type: Thread Seconds < Lower Is Better x86 . 2.967 |================================================================== IPC_benchmark Type: Unnamed Unix Domain Socket - Message Bytes: 2048 Messages Per Second > Higher Is Better x86 . 1276943 |================================================================ IPC_benchmark Type: Unnamed Unix Domain Socket - Message Bytes: 1024 Messages Per Second > Higher Is Better x86 . 1226335 |================================================================ IPC_benchmark Type: Unnamed Unix Domain Socket - Message Bytes: 512 Messages Per Second > Higher Is Better x86 . 1286403 |================================================================ IPC_benchmark Type: Unnamed Unix Domain Socket - Message Bytes: 256 Messages Per Second > Higher Is Better x86 . 1310476 |================================================================ IPC_benchmark Type: Unnamed Unix Domain Socket - Message Bytes: 128 Messages Per Second > Higher Is Better x86 . 1351687 |================================================================ IPC_benchmark Type: FIFO Named Pipe - Message Bytes: 4096 Messages Per Second > Higher Is Better x86 . 781420 |================================================================= IPC_benchmark Type: FIFO Named Pipe - Message Bytes: 2048 Messages Per Second > Higher Is Better x86 . 1014294 |================================================================ IPC_benchmark Type: FIFO Named Pipe - Message Bytes: 1024 Messages Per Second > Higher Is Better x86 . 1112417 |================================================================ IPC_benchmark Type: FIFO Named Pipe - Message Bytes: 512 Messages Per Second > Higher Is Better x86 . 1185431 |================================================================ IPC_benchmark Type: FIFO Named Pipe - Message Bytes: 256 Messages Per Second > Higher Is Better x86 . 1295141 |================================================================ IPC_benchmark Type: FIFO Named Pipe - Message Bytes: 128 Messages Per Second > Higher Is Better x86 . 1330463 |================================================================ IPC_benchmark Type: Unnamed Pipe - Message Bytes: 4096 Messages Per Second > Higher Is Better x86 . 761187 |================================================================= IPC_benchmark Type: Unnamed Pipe - Message Bytes: 2048 Messages Per Second > Higher Is Better x86 . 1037783 |================================================================ IPC_benchmark Type: Unnamed Pipe - Message Bytes: 1024 Messages Per Second > Higher Is Better x86 . 1099812 |================================================================ IPC_benchmark Type: Unnamed Pipe - Message Bytes: 512 Messages Per Second > Higher Is Better x86 . 1236839 |================================================================ IPC_benchmark Type: Unnamed Pipe - Message Bytes: 256 Messages Per Second > Higher Is Better x86 . 1391877 |================================================================ IPC_benchmark Type: Unnamed Pipe - Message Bytes: 128 Messages Per Second > Higher Is Better x86 . 1393973 |================================================================ IPC_benchmark Type: TCP Socket - Message Bytes: 4096 Messages Per Second > Higher Is Better x86 . 1186255 |================================================================ IPC_benchmark Type: TCP Socket - Message Bytes: 2048 Messages Per Second > Higher Is Better x86 . 1625249 |================================================================ IPC_benchmark Type: TCP Socket - Message Bytes: 1024 Messages Per Second > Higher Is Better x86 . 2212045 |================================================================ IPC_benchmark Type: TCP Socket - Message Bytes: 512 Messages Per Second > Higher Is Better x86 . 2525100 |================================================================ IPC_benchmark Type: TCP Socket - Message Bytes: 256 Messages Per Second > Higher Is Better x86 . 2617847 |================================================================ IPC_benchmark Type: TCP Socket - Message Bytes: 128 Messages Per Second > Higher Is Better x86 . 2876716 |================================================================ iPerf 3.14 Server Address: localhost - Server Port: 5201 - Duration: 10 Seconds - Test: UDP - Parallel: 64 Mbits/sec > Higher Is Better x86 . 67.2 |=================================================================== iPerf 3.14 Server Address: localhost - Server Port: 5201 - Duration: 10 Seconds - Test: UDP - Parallel: 32 Mbits/sec > Higher Is Better x86 . 33.6 |=================================================================== iPerf 3.14 Server Address: localhost - Server Port: 5201 - Duration: 10 Seconds - Test: UDP - Parallel: 1 Mbits/sec > Higher Is Better x86 . 1.05 |=================================================================== iPerf 3.14 Server Address: localhost - Server Port: 5201 - Duration: 10 Seconds - Test: TCP - Parallel: 1 Mbits/sec > Higher Is Better x86 . 71150 |================================================================== iPerf 3.14 Server Address: localhost - Server Port: 5201 - Duration: 10 Seconds - Test: UDP - 1000Mbit Objective - Parallel: 64 Mbits/sec > Higher Is Better x86 . 31995 |================================================================== iPerf 3.14 Server Address: localhost - Server Port: 5201 - Duration: 10 Seconds - Test: UDP - 1000Mbit Objective - Parallel: 32 Mbits/sec > Higher Is Better x86 . 31977 |================================================================== iPerf 3.14 Server Address: localhost - Server Port: 5201 - Duration: 10 Seconds - Test: UDP - 100Mbit Objective - Parallel: 64 Mbits/sec > Higher Is Better x86 . 6400 |=================================================================== iPerf 3.14 Server Address: localhost - Server Port: 5201 - Duration: 10 Seconds - Test: UDP - 100Mbit Objective - Parallel: 32 Mbits/sec > Higher Is Better x86 . 3200 |=================================================================== iPerf 3.14 Server Address: localhost - Server Port: 5201 - Duration: 10 Seconds - Test: UDP - 1000Mbit Objective - Parallel: 1 Mbits/sec > Higher Is Better x86 . 1000 |=================================================================== iPerf 3.14 Server Address: localhost - Server Port: 5201 - Duration: 10 Seconds - Test: UDP - 100Mbit Objective - Parallel: 1 Mbits/sec > Higher Is Better x86 . 100 |==================================================================== Ethr 1.0 Server Address: localhost - Protocol: TCP - Test: Connections/s - Threads: 8 Connections/sec > Higher Is Better x86 . 24925.88 |=============================================================== Ethr 1.0 Server Address: localhost - Protocol: TCP - Test: Connections/s - Threads: 1 Connections/sec > Higher Is Better x86 . 12136.33 |=============================================================== Ethr 1.0 Server Address: localhost - Protocol: UDP - Test: Bandwidth - Threads: 64 Packets/sec > Higher Is Better x86 . 2310667 |================================================================ Ethr 1.0 Server Address: localhost - Protocol: UDP - Test: Bandwidth - Threads: 32 Packets/sec > Higher Is Better x86 . 2351467 |================================================================ Ethr 1.0 Server Address: localhost - Protocol: UDP - Test: Bandwidth - Threads: 8 Packets/sec > Higher Is Better x86 . 1479300 |================================================================ Ethr 1.0 Server Address: localhost - Protocol: UDP - Test: Bandwidth - Threads: 1 Packets/sec > Higher Is Better x86 . 189601.55 |============================================================== Ethr 1.0 Server Address: localhost - Protocol: TCP - Test: Bandwidth - Threads: 8 Gbits/sec > Higher Is Better x86 . 103.70 |================================================================= Ethr 1.0 Server Address: localhost - Protocol: TCP - Test: Bandwidth - Threads: 1 Gbits/sec > Higher Is Better x86 . 25.56 |================================================================== Ethr 1.0 Server Address: localhost - Protocol: TCP - Test: Latency - Threads: 64 us < Lower Is Better x86 . 33.40 |================================================================== Ethr 1.0 Server Address: localhost - Protocol: TCP - Test: Latency - Threads: 32 us < Lower Is Better x86 . 33.95 |================================================================== Ethr 1.0 Server Address: localhost - Protocol: TCP - Test: Latency - Threads: 8 us < Lower Is Better x86 . 33.30 |================================================================== Ethr 1.0 Server Address: localhost - Protocol: TCP - Test: Latency - Threads: 1 us < Lower Is Better x86 . 32.79 |================================================================== pmbench Concurrent Worker Threads: 48 - Read-Write Ratio: 80% Reads 20% Writes us - Average Page Latency < Lower Is Better x86 . 0.1641 |================================================================= pmbench Concurrent Worker Threads: 32 - Read-Write Ratio: 80% Reads 20% Writes us - Average Page Latency < Lower Is Better x86 . 0.1426 |================================================================= pmbench Concurrent Worker Threads: 16 - Read-Write Ratio: 80% Reads 20% Writes us - Average Page Latency < Lower Is Better x86 . 0.1282 |================================================================= pmbench Concurrent Worker Threads: 8 - Read-Write Ratio: 80% Reads 20% Writes us - Average Page Latency < Lower Is Better x86 . 0.1253 |================================================================= pmbench Concurrent Worker Threads: 4 - Read-Write Ratio: 80% Reads 20% Writes us - Average Page Latency < Lower Is Better x86 . 0.1227 |================================================================= pmbench Concurrent Worker Threads: 2 - Read-Write Ratio: 80% Reads 20% Writes us - Average Page Latency < Lower Is Better x86 . 0.1216 |================================================================= pmbench Concurrent Worker Threads: 1 - Read-Write Ratio: 80% Reads 20% Writes us - Average Page Latency < Lower Is Better x86 . 0.0982 |================================================================= pmbench Concurrent Worker Threads: 48 - Read-Write Ratio: 100% Writes us - Average Page Latency < Lower Is Better x86 . 0.1566 |================================================================= pmbench Concurrent Worker Threads: 32 - Read-Write Ratio: 100% Writes us - Average Page Latency < Lower Is Better x86 . 0.1088 |================================================================= pmbench Concurrent Worker Threads: 16 - Read-Write Ratio: 100% Writes us - Average Page Latency < Lower Is Better x86 . 0.0679 |================================================================= pmbench Concurrent Worker Threads: 8 - Read-Write Ratio: 100% Writes us - Average Page Latency < Lower Is Better x86 . 0.0564 |================================================================= pmbench Concurrent Worker Threads: 48 - Read-Write Ratio: 100% Reads us - Average Page Latency < Lower Is Better x86 . 0.0600 |================================================================= pmbench Concurrent Worker Threads: 4 - Read-Write Ratio: 100% Writes us - Average Page Latency < Lower Is Better x86 . 0.0533 |================================================================= pmbench Concurrent Worker Threads: 32 - Read-Write Ratio: 100% Reads us - Average Page Latency < Lower Is Better x86 . 0.0506 |================================================================= pmbench Concurrent Worker Threads: 2 - Read-Write Ratio: 100% Writes us - Average Page Latency < Lower Is Better x86 . 0.0525 |================================================================= pmbench Concurrent Worker Threads: 16 - Read-Write Ratio: 100% Reads us - Average Page Latency < Lower Is Better x86 . 0.0465 |================================================================= pmbench Concurrent Worker Threads: 1 - Read-Write Ratio: 100% Writes us - Average Page Latency < Lower Is Better x86 . 0.0479 |================================================================= pmbench Concurrent Worker Threads: 2 - Read-Write Ratio: 100% Reads us - Average Page Latency < Lower Is Better x86 . 0.0462 |================================================================= pmbench Concurrent Worker Threads: 1 - Read-Write Ratio: 100% Reads us - Average Page Latency < Lower Is Better x86 . 0.0462 |================================================================= pmbench Concurrent Worker Threads: 48 - Read-Write Ratio: 50% us - Average Page Latency < Lower Is Better x86 . 0.1581 |================================================================= pmbench Concurrent Worker Threads: 32 - Read-Write Ratio: 50% us - Average Page Latency < Lower Is Better x86 . 0.1221 |================================================================= pmbench Concurrent Worker Threads: 16 - Read-Write Ratio: 50% us - Average Page Latency < Lower Is Better x86 . 0.1049 |================================================================= pmbench Concurrent Worker Threads: 8 - Read-Write Ratio: 50% us - Average Page Latency < Lower Is Better x86 . 0.0936 |================================================================= pmbench Concurrent Worker Threads: 4 - Read-Write Ratio: 50% us - Average Page Latency < Lower Is Better x86 . 0.0979 |================================================================= pmbench Concurrent Worker Threads: 2 - Read-Write Ratio: 50% us - Average Page Latency < Lower Is Better x86 . 0.0962 |================================================================= pmbench Concurrent Worker Threads: 1 - Read-Write Ratio: 50% us - Average Page Latency < Lower Is Better x86 . 0.0816 |================================================================= t-test1 2017-01-13 Threads: 2 Seconds < Lower Is Better x86 . 7.553 |================================================================== t-test1 2017-01-13 Threads: 1 Seconds < Lower Is Better x86 . 21.88 |================================================================== MBW 2018-09-08 Test: Memory Copy, Fixed Block Size - Array Size: 8192 MiB MiB/s > Higher Is Better x86 . 3078.91 |================================================================ MBW 2018-09-08 Test: Memory Copy, Fixed Block Size - Array Size: 4096 MiB MiB/s > Higher Is Better x86 . 3065.33 |================================================================ MBW 2018-09-08 Test: Memory Copy, Fixed Block Size - Array Size: 1024 MiB MiB/s > Higher Is Better x86 . 3060.52 |================================================================ MBW 2018-09-08 Test: Memory Copy, Fixed Block Size - Array Size: 512 MiB MiB/s > Higher Is Better x86 . 3080.99 |================================================================ MBW 2018-09-08 Test: Memory Copy, Fixed Block Size - Array Size: 128 MiB MiB/s > Higher Is Better x86 . 3084.15 |================================================================ MBW 2018-09-08 Test: Memory Copy - Array Size: 8192 MiB MiB/s > Higher Is Better x86 . 6025.16 |================================================================ MBW 2018-09-08 Test: Memory Copy - Array Size: 4096 MiB MiB/s > Higher Is Better x86 . 6013.85 |================================================================ MBW 2018-09-08 Test: Memory Copy - Array Size: 1024 MiB MiB/s > Higher Is Better x86 . 6092.44 |================================================================ MBW 2018-09-08 Test: Memory Copy - Array Size: 512 MiB MiB/s > Higher Is Better x86 . 6052.49 |================================================================ MBW 2018-09-08 Test: Memory Copy - Array Size: 128 MiB MiB/s > Higher Is Better x86 . 6129.42 |================================================================ Tinymembench 2018-05-28 Standard Memset MB/s > Higher Is Better x86 . 10284.5 |================================================================ Tinymembench 2018-05-28 Standard Memcpy MB/s > Higher Is Better x86 . 8386.3 |================================================================= Stress-NG 0.16.04 Test: CPU Cache Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better x86 . 1279011.27 |============================================================= Stress-NG 0.16.04 Test: Futex Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better x86 . 1410.75 |================================================================ Stress-NG 0.16.04 Test: NUMA Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better x86 . 27.83 |================================================================== Hackbench Count: 8 - Type: Process Seconds < Lower Is Better x86 . 11.97 |================================================================== Hackbench Count: 16 - Type: Thread Seconds < Lower Is Better x86 . 19.34 |================================================================== Hackbench Count: 8 - Type: Thread Seconds < Lower Is Better x86 . 16.34 |================================================================== IPC_benchmark Type: Unnamed Unix Domain Socket - Message Bytes: 4096 Messages Per Second > Higher Is Better x86 . 730827 |================================================================= iPerf 3.14 Server Address: localhost - Server Port: 5201 - Duration: 10 Seconds - Test: TCP - Parallel: 64 Mbits/sec > Higher Is Better x86 . 31142 |================================================================== iPerf 3.14 Server Address: localhost - Server Port: 5201 - Duration: 10 Seconds - Test: TCP - Parallel: 32 Mbits/sec > Higher Is Better x86 . 42045 |================================================================== Ethr 1.0 Server Address: localhost - Protocol: TCP - Test: Connections/s - Threads: 64 Connections/sec > Higher Is Better x86 . 20386.52 |=============================================================== Ethr 1.0 Server Address: localhost - Protocol: TCP - Test: Connections/s - Threads: 32 Connections/sec > Higher Is Better x86 . 23052.05 |=============================================================== Ethr 1.0 Server Address: localhost - Protocol: TCP - Test: Bandwidth - Threads: 64 Gbits/sec > Higher Is Better x86 . 41.24 |================================================================== Ethr 1.0 Server Address: localhost - Protocol: TCP - Test: Bandwidth - Threads: 32 Gbits/sec > Higher Is Better x86 . 57.92 |================================================================== pmbench Concurrent Worker Threads: 8 - Read-Write Ratio: 100% Reads us - Average Page Latency < Lower Is Better x86 . 0.0462 |================================================================= pmbench Concurrent Worker Threads: 4 - Read-Write Ratio: 100% Reads us - Average Page Latency < Lower Is Better x86 . 0.0449 |================================================================= PostMark 1.51 Disk Transaction Performance TPS > Higher Is Better x86 . 920 |====================================================================