Compare your own system(s) to this result file with the
Phoronix Test Suite by running the command:
phoronix-test-suite benchmark 2404125-FI-JHLT3117817
JHLT3.1
x86
x86:
Processor: 2 x Intel Xeon Silver 4310 @ 3.30GHz (24 Cores / 48 Threads), Motherboard: Inspur NF5280M6 (06.00.03 BIOS), Chipset: Intel Device 0998, Memory: 2 x 32 GB DDR4-3200MT/s Samsung M393A4K40EB3-CWE, Disk: 600GB INSPUR + 31GB SanDisk 3.2Gen1, Graphics: ASPEED, Monitor: VGA, Network: 4 x Intel I350
OS: JHLT 3.1, Kernel: 3.10.0-1062.lt3.x86_64 (x86_64), Compiler: GCC 4.8.5 20150623, File-System: ext3, Screen Resolution: 1280x1024
PostMark 1.51
Disk Transaction Performance
TPS > Higher Is Better
x86 . 920 |====================================================================
Tinymembench 2018-05-28
Standard Memcpy
MB/s > Higher Is Better
x86 . 8386.3 |=================================================================
Tinymembench 2018-05-28
Standard Memset
MB/s > Higher Is Better
x86 . 10284.5 |================================================================
MBW 2018-09-08
Test: Memory Copy - Array Size: 128 MiB
MiB/s > Higher Is Better
x86 . 6129.42 |================================================================
MBW 2018-09-08
Test: Memory Copy - Array Size: 512 MiB
MiB/s > Higher Is Better
x86 . 6052.49 |================================================================
MBW 2018-09-08
Test: Memory Copy - Array Size: 1024 MiB
MiB/s > Higher Is Better
x86 . 6092.44 |================================================================
MBW 2018-09-08
Test: Memory Copy - Array Size: 4096 MiB
MiB/s > Higher Is Better
x86 . 6013.85 |================================================================
MBW 2018-09-08
Test: Memory Copy - Array Size: 8192 MiB
MiB/s > Higher Is Better
x86 . 6025.16 |================================================================
MBW 2018-09-08
Test: Memory Copy, Fixed Block Size - Array Size: 128 MiB
MiB/s > Higher Is Better
x86 . 3084.15 |================================================================
MBW 2018-09-08
Test: Memory Copy, Fixed Block Size - Array Size: 512 MiB
MiB/s > Higher Is Better
x86 . 3080.99 |================================================================
MBW 2018-09-08
Test: Memory Copy, Fixed Block Size - Array Size: 1024 MiB
MiB/s > Higher Is Better
x86 . 3060.52 |================================================================
MBW 2018-09-08
Test: Memory Copy, Fixed Block Size - Array Size: 4096 MiB
MiB/s > Higher Is Better
x86 . 3065.33 |================================================================
MBW 2018-09-08
Test: Memory Copy, Fixed Block Size - Array Size: 8192 MiB
MiB/s > Higher Is Better
x86 . 3078.91 |================================================================
t-test1 2017-01-13
Threads: 1
Seconds < Lower Is Better
x86 . 21.88 |==================================================================
t-test1 2017-01-13
Threads: 2
Seconds < Lower Is Better
x86 . 7.553 |==================================================================
pmbench
Concurrent Worker Threads: 1 - Read-Write Ratio: 50%
us - Average Page Latency < Lower Is Better
x86 . 0.0816 |=================================================================
pmbench
Concurrent Worker Threads: 2 - Read-Write Ratio: 50%
us - Average Page Latency < Lower Is Better
x86 . 0.0962 |=================================================================
pmbench
Concurrent Worker Threads: 4 - Read-Write Ratio: 50%
us - Average Page Latency < Lower Is Better
x86 . 0.0979 |=================================================================
pmbench
Concurrent Worker Threads: 8 - Read-Write Ratio: 50%
us - Average Page Latency < Lower Is Better
x86 . 0.0936 |=================================================================
pmbench
Concurrent Worker Threads: 16 - Read-Write Ratio: 50%
us - Average Page Latency < Lower Is Better
x86 . 0.1049 |=================================================================
pmbench
Concurrent Worker Threads: 32 - Read-Write Ratio: 50%
us - Average Page Latency < Lower Is Better
x86 . 0.1221 |=================================================================
pmbench
Concurrent Worker Threads: 48 - Read-Write Ratio: 50%
us - Average Page Latency < Lower Is Better
x86 . 0.1581 |=================================================================
pmbench
Concurrent Worker Threads: 1 - Read-Write Ratio: 100% Reads
us - Average Page Latency < Lower Is Better
x86 . 0.0462 |=================================================================
pmbench
Concurrent Worker Threads: 2 - Read-Write Ratio: 100% Reads
us - Average Page Latency < Lower Is Better
x86 . 0.0462 |=================================================================
pmbench
Concurrent Worker Threads: 4 - Read-Write Ratio: 100% Reads
us - Average Page Latency < Lower Is Better
x86 . 0.0449 |=================================================================
pmbench
Concurrent Worker Threads: 8 - Read-Write Ratio: 100% Reads
us - Average Page Latency < Lower Is Better
x86 . 0.0462 |=================================================================
pmbench
Concurrent Worker Threads: 1 - Read-Write Ratio: 100% Writes
us - Average Page Latency < Lower Is Better
x86 . 0.0479 |=================================================================
pmbench
Concurrent Worker Threads: 16 - Read-Write Ratio: 100% Reads
us - Average Page Latency < Lower Is Better
x86 . 0.0465 |=================================================================
pmbench
Concurrent Worker Threads: 2 - Read-Write Ratio: 100% Writes
us - Average Page Latency < Lower Is Better
x86 . 0.0525 |=================================================================
pmbench
Concurrent Worker Threads: 32 - Read-Write Ratio: 100% Reads
us - Average Page Latency < Lower Is Better
x86 . 0.0506 |=================================================================
pmbench
Concurrent Worker Threads: 4 - Read-Write Ratio: 100% Writes
us - Average Page Latency < Lower Is Better
x86 . 0.0533 |=================================================================
pmbench
Concurrent Worker Threads: 48 - Read-Write Ratio: 100% Reads
us - Average Page Latency < Lower Is Better
x86 . 0.0600 |=================================================================
pmbench
Concurrent Worker Threads: 8 - Read-Write Ratio: 100% Writes
us - Average Page Latency < Lower Is Better
x86 . 0.0564 |=================================================================
pmbench
Concurrent Worker Threads: 16 - Read-Write Ratio: 100% Writes
us - Average Page Latency < Lower Is Better
x86 . 0.0679 |=================================================================
pmbench
Concurrent Worker Threads: 32 - Read-Write Ratio: 100% Writes
us - Average Page Latency < Lower Is Better
x86 . 0.1088 |=================================================================
pmbench
Concurrent Worker Threads: 48 - Read-Write Ratio: 100% Writes
us - Average Page Latency < Lower Is Better
x86 . 0.1566 |=================================================================
pmbench
Concurrent Worker Threads: 1 - Read-Write Ratio: 80% Reads 20% Writes
us - Average Page Latency < Lower Is Better
x86 . 0.0982 |=================================================================
pmbench
Concurrent Worker Threads: 2 - Read-Write Ratio: 80% Reads 20% Writes
us - Average Page Latency < Lower Is Better
x86 . 0.1216 |=================================================================
pmbench
Concurrent Worker Threads: 4 - Read-Write Ratio: 80% Reads 20% Writes
us - Average Page Latency < Lower Is Better
x86 . 0.1227 |=================================================================
pmbench
Concurrent Worker Threads: 8 - Read-Write Ratio: 80% Reads 20% Writes
us - Average Page Latency < Lower Is Better
x86 . 0.1253 |=================================================================
pmbench
Concurrent Worker Threads: 16 - Read-Write Ratio: 80% Reads 20% Writes
us - Average Page Latency < Lower Is Better
x86 . 0.1282 |=================================================================
pmbench
Concurrent Worker Threads: 32 - Read-Write Ratio: 80% Reads 20% Writes
us - Average Page Latency < Lower Is Better
x86 . 0.1426 |=================================================================
pmbench
Concurrent Worker Threads: 48 - Read-Write Ratio: 80% Reads 20% Writes
us - Average Page Latency < Lower Is Better
x86 . 0.1641 |=================================================================
Ethr 1.0
Server Address: localhost - Protocol: TCP - Test: Latency - Threads: 1
us < Lower Is Better
x86 . 32.79 |==================================================================
Ethr 1.0
Server Address: localhost - Protocol: TCP - Test: Latency - Threads: 8
us < Lower Is Better
x86 . 33.30 |==================================================================
Ethr 1.0
Server Address: localhost - Protocol: TCP - Test: Latency - Threads: 32
us < Lower Is Better
x86 . 33.95 |==================================================================
Ethr 1.0
Server Address: localhost - Protocol: TCP - Test: Latency - Threads: 64
us < Lower Is Better
x86 . 33.40 |==================================================================
Ethr 1.0
Server Address: localhost - Protocol: TCP - Test: Bandwidth - Threads: 1
Gbits/sec > Higher Is Better
x86 . 25.56 |==================================================================
Ethr 1.0
Server Address: localhost - Protocol: TCP - Test: Bandwidth - Threads: 8
Gbits/sec > Higher Is Better
x86 . 103.70 |=================================================================
Ethr 1.0
Server Address: localhost - Protocol: UDP - Test: Bandwidth - Threads: 1
Packets/sec > Higher Is Better
x86 . 189601.55 |==============================================================
Ethr 1.0
Server Address: localhost - Protocol: UDP - Test: Bandwidth - Threads: 8
Packets/sec > Higher Is Better
x86 . 1479300 |================================================================
Ethr 1.0
Server Address: localhost - Protocol: TCP - Test: Bandwidth - Threads: 32
Gbits/sec > Higher Is Better
x86 . 57.92 |==================================================================
Ethr 1.0
Server Address: localhost - Protocol: TCP - Test: Bandwidth - Threads: 64
Gbits/sec > Higher Is Better
x86 . 41.24 |==================================================================
Ethr 1.0
Server Address: localhost - Protocol: UDP - Test: Bandwidth - Threads: 32
Packets/sec > Higher Is Better
x86 . 2351467 |================================================================
Ethr 1.0
Server Address: localhost - Protocol: UDP - Test: Bandwidth - Threads: 64
Packets/sec > Higher Is Better
x86 . 2310667 |================================================================
Ethr 1.0
Server Address: localhost - Protocol: TCP - Test: Connections/s - Threads: 1
Connections/sec > Higher Is Better
x86 . 12136.33 |===============================================================
Ethr 1.0
Server Address: localhost - Protocol: TCP - Test: Connections/s - Threads: 8
Connections/sec > Higher Is Better
x86 . 24925.88 |===============================================================
Ethr 1.0
Server Address: localhost - Protocol: TCP - Test: Connections/s - Threads: 32
Connections/sec > Higher Is Better
x86 . 23052.05 |===============================================================
Ethr 1.0
Server Address: localhost - Protocol: TCP - Test: Connections/s - Threads: 64
Connections/sec > Higher Is Better
x86 . 20386.52 |===============================================================
iPerf 3.14
Server Address: localhost - Server Port: 5201 - Duration: 10 Seconds - Test: UDP - 100Mbit Objective - Parallel: 1
Mbits/sec > Higher Is Better
x86 . 100 |====================================================================
iPerf 3.14
Server Address: localhost - Server Port: 5201 - Duration: 10 Seconds - Test: UDP - 1000Mbit Objective - Parallel: 1
Mbits/sec > Higher Is Better
x86 . 1000 |===================================================================
iPerf 3.14
Server Address: localhost - Server Port: 5201 - Duration: 10 Seconds - Test: UDP - 100Mbit Objective - Parallel: 32
Mbits/sec > Higher Is Better
x86 . 3200 |===================================================================
iPerf 3.14
Server Address: localhost - Server Port: 5201 - Duration: 10 Seconds - Test: UDP - 100Mbit Objective - Parallel: 64
Mbits/sec > Higher Is Better
x86 . 6400 |===================================================================
iPerf 3.14
Server Address: localhost - Server Port: 5201 - Duration: 10 Seconds - Test: UDP - 1000Mbit Objective - Parallel: 32
Mbits/sec > Higher Is Better
x86 . 31977 |==================================================================
iPerf 3.14
Server Address: localhost - Server Port: 5201 - Duration: 10 Seconds - Test: UDP - 1000Mbit Objective - Parallel: 64
Mbits/sec > Higher Is Better
x86 . 31995 |==================================================================
iPerf 3.14
Server Address: localhost - Server Port: 5201 - Duration: 10 Seconds - Test: TCP - Parallel: 1
Mbits/sec > Higher Is Better
x86 . 71150 |==================================================================
iPerf 3.14
Server Address: localhost - Server Port: 5201 - Duration: 10 Seconds - Test: UDP - Parallel: 1
Mbits/sec > Higher Is Better
x86 . 1.05 |===================================================================
iPerf 3.14
Server Address: localhost - Server Port: 5201 - Duration: 10 Seconds - Test: TCP - Parallel: 32
Mbits/sec > Higher Is Better
x86 . 42045 |==================================================================
iPerf 3.14
Server Address: localhost - Server Port: 5201 - Duration: 10 Seconds - Test: TCP - Parallel: 64
Mbits/sec > Higher Is Better
x86 . 31142 |==================================================================
iPerf 3.14
Server Address: localhost - Server Port: 5201 - Duration: 10 Seconds - Test: UDP - Parallel: 32
Mbits/sec > Higher Is Better
x86 . 33.6 |===================================================================
iPerf 3.14
Server Address: localhost - Server Port: 5201 - Duration: 10 Seconds - Test: UDP - Parallel: 64
Mbits/sec > Higher Is Better
x86 . 67.2 |===================================================================
IPC_benchmark
Type: TCP Socket - Message Bytes: 128
Messages Per Second > Higher Is Better
x86 . 2876716 |================================================================
IPC_benchmark
Type: TCP Socket - Message Bytes: 256
Messages Per Second > Higher Is Better
x86 . 2617847 |================================================================
IPC_benchmark
Type: TCP Socket - Message Bytes: 512
Messages Per Second > Higher Is Better
x86 . 2525100 |================================================================
IPC_benchmark
Type: TCP Socket - Message Bytes: 1024
Messages Per Second > Higher Is Better
x86 . 2212045 |================================================================
IPC_benchmark
Type: TCP Socket - Message Bytes: 2048
Messages Per Second > Higher Is Better
x86 . 1625249 |================================================================
IPC_benchmark
Type: TCP Socket - Message Bytes: 4096
Messages Per Second > Higher Is Better
x86 . 1186255 |================================================================
IPC_benchmark
Type: Unnamed Pipe - Message Bytes: 128
Messages Per Second > Higher Is Better
x86 . 1393973 |================================================================
IPC_benchmark
Type: Unnamed Pipe - Message Bytes: 256
Messages Per Second > Higher Is Better
x86 . 1391877 |================================================================
IPC_benchmark
Type: Unnamed Pipe - Message Bytes: 512
Messages Per Second > Higher Is Better
x86 . 1236839 |================================================================
IPC_benchmark
Type: Unnamed Pipe - Message Bytes: 1024
Messages Per Second > Higher Is Better
x86 . 1099812 |================================================================
IPC_benchmark
Type: Unnamed Pipe - Message Bytes: 2048
Messages Per Second > Higher Is Better
x86 . 1037783 |================================================================
IPC_benchmark
Type: Unnamed Pipe - Message Bytes: 4096
Messages Per Second > Higher Is Better
x86 . 761187 |=================================================================
IPC_benchmark
Type: FIFO Named Pipe - Message Bytes: 128
Messages Per Second > Higher Is Better
x86 . 1330463 |================================================================
IPC_benchmark
Type: FIFO Named Pipe - Message Bytes: 256
Messages Per Second > Higher Is Better
x86 . 1295141 |================================================================
IPC_benchmark
Type: FIFO Named Pipe - Message Bytes: 512
Messages Per Second > Higher Is Better
x86 . 1185431 |================================================================
IPC_benchmark
Type: FIFO Named Pipe - Message Bytes: 1024
Messages Per Second > Higher Is Better
x86 . 1112417 |================================================================
IPC_benchmark
Type: FIFO Named Pipe - Message Bytes: 2048
Messages Per Second > Higher Is Better
x86 . 1014294 |================================================================
IPC_benchmark
Type: FIFO Named Pipe - Message Bytes: 4096
Messages Per Second > Higher Is Better
x86 . 781420 |=================================================================
IPC_benchmark
Type: Unnamed Unix Domain Socket - Message Bytes: 128
Messages Per Second > Higher Is Better
x86 . 1351687 |================================================================
IPC_benchmark
Type: Unnamed Unix Domain Socket - Message Bytes: 256
Messages Per Second > Higher Is Better
x86 . 1310476 |================================================================
IPC_benchmark
Type: Unnamed Unix Domain Socket - Message Bytes: 512
Messages Per Second > Higher Is Better
x86 . 1286403 |================================================================
IPC_benchmark
Type: Unnamed Unix Domain Socket - Message Bytes: 1024
Messages Per Second > Higher Is Better
x86 . 1226335 |================================================================
IPC_benchmark
Type: Unnamed Unix Domain Socket - Message Bytes: 2048
Messages Per Second > Higher Is Better
x86 . 1276943 |================================================================
IPC_benchmark
Type: Unnamed Unix Domain Socket - Message Bytes: 4096
Messages Per Second > Higher Is Better
x86 . 730827 |=================================================================
Hackbench
Count: 1 - Type: Thread
Seconds < Lower Is Better
x86 . 2.967 |==================================================================
Hackbench
Count: 2 - Type: Thread
Seconds < Lower Is Better
x86 . 3.139 |==================================================================
Hackbench
Count: 4 - Type: Thread
Seconds < Lower Is Better
x86 . 5.512 |==================================================================
Hackbench
Count: 8 - Type: Thread
Seconds < Lower Is Better
x86 . 16.34 |==================================================================
Hackbench
Count: 1 - Type: Process
Seconds < Lower Is Better
x86 . 2.763 |==================================================================
Hackbench
Count: 16 - Type: Thread
Seconds < Lower Is Better
x86 . 19.34 |==================================================================
Hackbench
Count: 2 - Type: Process
Seconds < Lower Is Better
x86 . 2.892 |==================================================================
Hackbench
Count: 4 - Type: Process
Seconds < Lower Is Better
x86 . 5.133 |==================================================================
Hackbench
Count: 8 - Type: Process
Seconds < Lower Is Better
x86 . 11.97 |==================================================================
Hackbench
Count: 16 - Type: Process
Seconds < Lower Is Better
x86 . 15.87 |==================================================================
Hackbench
Count: 32 - Type: Process
Seconds < Lower Is Better
x86 . 29.26 |==================================================================
SQLite Speedtest 3.30
Timed Time - Size 1,000
Seconds < Lower Is Better
x86 . 91.85 |==================================================================
Stress-NG 0.16.04
Test: Hash
Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better
x86 . 3283663.54 |=============================================================
Stress-NG 0.16.04
Test: MMAP
Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better
x86 . 1301.33 |================================================================
Stress-NG 0.16.04
Test: NUMA
Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better
x86 . 27.83 |==================================================================
Stress-NG 0.16.04
Test: Pipe
Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better
x86 . 20443164.27 |============================================================
Stress-NG 0.16.04
Test: Poll
Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better
x86 . 7786109.02 |=============================================================
Stress-NG 0.16.04
Test: Zlib
Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better
x86 . 1382.72 |================================================================
Stress-NG 0.16.04
Test: Futex
Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better
x86 . 1410.75 |================================================================
Stress-NG 0.16.04
Test: Mutex
Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better
x86 . 601511.30 |==============================================================
Stress-NG 0.16.04
Test: Atomic
Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better
x86 . 122.60 |=================================================================
Stress-NG 0.16.04
Test: Crypto
Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better
x86 . 22264.58 |===============================================================
Stress-NG 0.16.04
Test: Malloc
Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better
x86 . 38997647.62 |============================================================
Stress-NG 0.16.04
Test: Cloning
Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better
x86 . 229.26 |=================================================================
Stress-NG 0.16.04
Test: Forking
Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better
x86 . 6456.58 |================================================================
Stress-NG 0.16.04
Test: Pthread
Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better
x86 . 80161.11 |===============================================================
Stress-NG 0.16.04
Test: AVL Tree
Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better
x86 . 111.15 |=================================================================
Stress-NG 0.16.04
Test: SENDFILE
Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better
x86 . 521097.55 |==============================================================
Stress-NG 0.16.04
Test: CPU Cache
Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better
x86 . 1279011.27 |=============================================================
Stress-NG 0.16.04
Test: CPU Stress
Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better
x86 . 31290.04 |===============================================================
Stress-NG 0.16.04
Test: Semaphores
Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better
x86 . 47766739.18 |============================================================
Stress-NG 0.16.04
Test: Matrix Math
Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better
x86 . 92234.49 |===============================================================
Stress-NG 0.16.04
Test: Vector Math
Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better
x86 . 53675.30 |===============================================================
Stress-NG 0.16.04
Test: AVX-512 VNNI
Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better
x86 . 339866.46 |==============================================================
Stress-NG 0.16.04
Test: Function Call
Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better
x86 . 9914.48 |================================================================
Stress-NG 0.16.04
Test: x86_64 RdRand
Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better
x86 . 664100.53 |==============================================================
Stress-NG 0.16.04
Test: Floating Point
Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better
x86 . 5735.90 |================================================================
Stress-NG 0.16.04
Test: Matrix 3D Math
Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better
x86 . 1384.98 |================================================================
Stress-NG 0.16.04
Test: Memory Copying
Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better
x86 . 5148.18 |================================================================
Stress-NG 0.16.04
Test: Vector Shuffle
Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better
x86 . 12986.31 |===============================================================
Stress-NG 0.16.04
Test: Mixed Scheduler
Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better
x86 . 44103.12 |===============================================================
Stress-NG 0.16.04
Test: Socket Activity
Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better
x86 . 13204.25 |===============================================================
Stress-NG 0.16.04
Test: Wide Vector Math
Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better
x86 . 200905.44 |==============================================================
Stress-NG 0.16.04
Test: Context Switching
Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better
x86 . 10775928.91 |============================================================
Stress-NG 0.16.04
Test: Fused Multiply-Add
Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better
x86 . 9986742.85 |=============================================================
Stress-NG 0.16.04
Test: Vector Floating Point
Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better
x86 . 25033.20 |===============================================================
Stress-NG 0.16.04
Test: Glibc C String Functions
Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better
x86 . 8508754.25 |=============================================================
Stress-NG 0.16.04
Test: Glibc Qsort Data Sorting
Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better
x86 . 428.67 |=================================================================
Stress-NG 0.16.04
Test: System V Message Passing
Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better
x86 . 5010829.33 |=============================================================
ctx_clock
Context Switch Time
Clocks < Lower Is Better
x86 . 213 |====================================================================