r6g.4xlarge amazon testing on Amazon Linux 2023.4.20240401 via the Phoronix Test Suite. r6g.4xlarge: Processor: ARMv8 Neoverse-N1 (16 Cores), Motherboard: Amazon EC2 r6g.4xlarge (1.0 BIOS), Chipset: Amazon Device 0200, Memory: 128GB, Disk: 215GB Amazon Elastic Block Store, Network: Amazon Elastic OS: Amazon Linux 2023.4.20240401, Kernel: 6.1.82-99.168.amzn2023.aarch64 (aarch64) 20240325, Compiler: GCC 11.4.1 20230605, File-System: xfs, System Layer: amazon OpenSSL 3.1 Algorithm: SHA256 byte/s > Higher Is Better r6g.4xlarge . 10712087513 |==================================================== OpenSSL 3.1 Algorithm: SHA512 byte/s > Higher Is Better r6g.4xlarge . 3617155013 |===================================================== OpenSSL 3.1 Algorithm: ChaCha20 byte/s > Higher Is Better r6g.4xlarge . 16854830557 |==================================================== OpenSSL 3.1 Algorithm: AES-128-GCM byte/s > Higher Is Better r6g.4xlarge . 39725140013 |==================================================== OpenSSL 3.1 Algorithm: AES-256-GCM byte/s > Higher Is Better r6g.4xlarge . 32230997017 |==================================================== OpenSSL 3.1 Algorithm: ChaCha20-Poly1305 byte/s > Higher Is Better r6g.4xlarge . 11687814487 |==================================================== BlogBench 1.1 Test: Read Final Score > Higher Is Better r6g.4xlarge . 3005792 |======================================================== BlogBench 1.1 Test: Write Final Score > Higher Is Better r6g.4xlarge . 10825 |========================================================== x264 2022-02-22 Video Input: Bosphorus 4K Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better r6g.4xlarge . 19.48 |========================================================== x264 2022-02-22 Video Input: Bosphorus 1080p Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better r6g.4xlarge . 82.49 |========================================================== x265 3.6 Video Input: Bosphorus 4K Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better r6g.4xlarge . 7.98 |=========================================================== x265 3.6 Video Input: Bosphorus 1080p Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better r6g.4xlarge . 32.67 |========================================================== GNU GMP GMPbench 6.2.1 GMPbench Score > Higher Is Better GraphicsMagick 1.3.43 Operation: Swirl Iterations Per Minute > Higher Is Better r6g.4xlarge . 106 |============================================================ GraphicsMagick 1.3.43 Operation: Rotate Iterations Per Minute > Higher Is Better r6g.4xlarge . 109 |============================================================ GraphicsMagick 1.3.43 Operation: Sharpen Iterations Per Minute > Higher Is Better r6g.4xlarge . 48 |============================================================= GraphicsMagick 1.3.43 Operation: Enhanced Iterations Per Minute > Higher Is Better r6g.4xlarge . 35 |============================================================= GraphicsMagick 1.3.43 Operation: Resizing Iterations Per Minute > Higher Is Better r6g.4xlarge . 194 |============================================================ GraphicsMagick 1.3.43 Operation: Noise-Gaussian Iterations Per Minute > Higher Is Better r6g.4xlarge . 50 |============================================================= GraphicsMagick 1.3.43 Operation: HWB Color Space Iterations Per Minute > Higher Is Better r6g.4xlarge . 186 |============================================================ Stream 2013-01-17 Type: Copy MB/s > Higher Is Better r6g.4xlarge . 170463.0 |======================================================= Stream 2013-01-17 Type: Scale MB/s > Higher Is Better r6g.4xlarge . 171629.7 |======================================================= Stream 2013-01-17 Type: Triad MB/s > Higher Is Better r6g.4xlarge . 167372.9 |======================================================= Stream 2013-01-17 Type: Add MB/s > Higher Is Better r6g.4xlarge . 167210.0 |======================================================= CacheBench Test: Read MB/s > Higher Is Better r6g.4xlarge . 9525.61 |======================================================== CacheBench Test: Write MB/s > Higher Is Better r6g.4xlarge . 31540.11 |======================================================= CacheBench Test: Read / Modify / Write MB/s > Higher Is Better r6g.4xlarge . 49943.27 |======================================================= Zstd Compression 1.5.4 Compression Level: 3 - Compression Speed MB/s > Higher Is Better r6g.4xlarge . 1364.9 |========================================================= Zstd Compression 1.5.4 Compression Level: 3 - Decompression Speed MB/s > Higher Is Better r6g.4xlarge . 767.5 |========================================================== Zstd Compression 1.5.4 Compression Level: 8 - Compression Speed MB/s > Higher Is Better r6g.4xlarge . 346.5 |========================================================== Zstd Compression 1.5.4 Compression Level: 8 - Decompression Speed MB/s > Higher Is Better r6g.4xlarge . 781.1 |========================================================== Zstd Compression 1.5.4 Compression Level: 12 - Compression Speed MB/s > Higher Is Better r6g.4xlarge . 107.9 |========================================================== Zstd Compression 1.5.4 Compression Level: 12 - Decompression Speed MB/s > Higher Is Better r6g.4xlarge . 696.9 |========================================================== Zstd Compression 1.5.4 Compression Level: 19 - Compression Speed MB/s > Higher Is Better r6g.4xlarge . 8.78 |=========================================================== Zstd Compression 1.5.4 Compression Level: 19 - Decompression Speed MB/s > Higher Is Better r6g.4xlarge . 577.5 |========================================================== Zstd Compression 1.5.4 Compression Level: 3, Long Mode - Compression Speed MB/s > Higher Is Better r6g.4xlarge . 558.4 |========================================================== Zstd Compression 1.5.4 Compression Level: 3, Long Mode - Decompression Speed MB/s > Higher Is Better r6g.4xlarge . 794.5 |========================================================== Zstd Compression 1.5.4 Compression Level: 8, Long Mode - Compression Speed MB/s > Higher Is Better r6g.4xlarge . 386.7 |========================================================== Zstd Compression 1.5.4 Compression Level: 8, Long Mode - Decompression Speed MB/s > Higher Is Better r6g.4xlarge . 785.6 |========================================================== Zstd Compression 1.5.4 Compression Level: 19, Long Mode - Compression Speed MB/s > Higher Is Better r6g.4xlarge . 4.38 |=========================================================== Zstd Compression 1.5.4 Compression Level: 19, Long Mode - Decompression Speed MB/s > Higher Is Better r6g.4xlarge . 594.7 |========================================================== LZ4 Compression 1.9.4 Compression Level: 1 - Compression Speed MB/s > Higher Is Better r6g.4xlarge . 459.42 |========================================================= LZ4 Compression 1.9.4 Compression Level: 1 - Decompression Speed MB/s > Higher Is Better r6g.4xlarge . 2358.3 |========================================================= LZ4 Compression 1.9.4 Compression Level: 3 - Compression Speed MB/s > Higher Is Better r6g.4xlarge . 68.04 |========================================================== LZ4 Compression 1.9.4 Compression Level: 3 - Decompression Speed MB/s > Higher Is Better r6g.4xlarge . 2112.5 |========================================================= LZ4 Compression 1.9.4 Compression Level: 9 - Compression Speed MB/s > Higher Is Better r6g.4xlarge . 23.08 |========================================================== LZ4 Compression 1.9.4 Compression Level: 9 - Decompression Speed MB/s > Higher Is Better r6g.4xlarge . 2147.3 |========================================================= libjpeg-turbo tjbench 2.1.0 Test: Decompression Throughput Megapixels/sec > Higher Is Better SciMark 2.0 Computational Test: Composite Mflops > Higher Is Better r6g.4xlarge . 391.01 |========================================================= SciMark 2.0 Computational Test: Monte Carlo Mflops > Higher Is Better r6g.4xlarge . 99.64 |========================================================== SciMark 2.0 Computational Test: Fast Fourier Transform Mflops > Higher Is Better r6g.4xlarge . 103.12 |========================================================= SciMark 2.0 Computational Test: Sparse Matrix Multiply Mflops > Higher Is Better r6g.4xlarge . 386.55 |========================================================= SciMark 2.0 Computational Test: Dense LU Matrix Factorization Mflops > Higher Is Better r6g.4xlarge . 393.90 |========================================================= SciMark 2.0 Computational Test: Jacobi Successive Over-Relaxation Mflops > Higher Is Better r6g.4xlarge . 971.85 |========================================================= Botan 2.17.3 Test: KASUMI MiB/s > Higher Is Better r6g.4xlarge . 57.43 |========================================================== Botan 2.17.3 Test: KASUMI - Decrypt MiB/s > Higher Is Better r6g.4xlarge . 58.68 |========================================================== Botan 2.17.3 Test: AES-256 MiB/s > Higher Is Better r6g.4xlarge . 2301.18 |======================================================== Botan 2.17.3 Test: AES-256 - Decrypt MiB/s > Higher Is Better r6g.4xlarge . 2306.63 |======================================================== Botan 2.17.3 Test: Twofish MiB/s > Higher Is Better r6g.4xlarge . 207.93 |========================================================= Botan 2.17.3 Test: Twofish - Decrypt MiB/s > Higher Is Better r6g.4xlarge . 206.83 |========================================================= Botan 2.17.3 Test: Blowfish MiB/s > Higher Is Better r6g.4xlarge . 246.61 |========================================================= Botan 2.17.3 Test: Blowfish - Decrypt MiB/s > Higher Is Better r6g.4xlarge . 243.75 |========================================================= Botan 2.17.3 Test: CAST-256 MiB/s > Higher Is Better r6g.4xlarge . 94.86 |========================================================== Botan 2.17.3 Test: CAST-256 - Decrypt MiB/s > Higher Is Better r6g.4xlarge . 94.53 |========================================================== Botan 2.17.3 Test: ChaCha20Poly1305 MiB/s > Higher Is Better r6g.4xlarge . 241.67 |========================================================= Botan 2.17.3 Test: ChaCha20Poly1305 - Decrypt MiB/s > Higher Is Better r6g.4xlarge . 240.95 |========================================================= Stockfish 16.1 Chess Benchmark Nodes Per Second > Higher Is Better r6g.4xlarge . 9545114 |======================================================== Apache Cassandra 4.1.3 Test: Writes Op/s > Higher Is Better Apache Cassandra 4.1.3 Test: Mixed 1:1 Op/s > Higher Is Better Apache Cassandra 4.1.3 Test: Mixed 1:3 Op/s > Higher Is Better Redis 7.0.12 + memtier_benchmark 2.0 Protocol: Redis - Clients: 50 - Set To Get Ratio: 1:1 Ops/sec > Higher Is Better r6g.4xlarge . 1239410.54 |===================================================== Redis 7.0.12 + memtier_benchmark 2.0 Protocol: Redis - Clients: 50 - Set To Get Ratio: 1:5 Ops/sec > Higher Is Better r6g.4xlarge . 1328112.15 |===================================================== Redis 7.0.12 + memtier_benchmark 2.0 Protocol: Redis - Clients: 50 - Set To Get Ratio: 5:1 Ops/sec > Higher Is Better r6g.4xlarge . 1106619.44 |===================================================== Redis 7.0.12 + memtier_benchmark 2.0 Protocol: Redis - Clients: 100 - Set To Get Ratio: 1:1 Ops/sec > Higher Is Better r6g.4xlarge . 1091836.03 |===================================================== Redis 7.0.12 + memtier_benchmark 2.0 Protocol: Redis - Clients: 100 - Set To Get Ratio: 1:5 Ops/sec > Higher Is Better r6g.4xlarge . 1200393.02 |===================================================== Redis 7.0.12 + memtier_benchmark 2.0 Protocol: Redis - Clients: 100 - Set To Get Ratio: 5:1 Ops/sec > Higher Is Better r6g.4xlarge . 1028622.85 |===================================================== Redis 7.0.12 + memtier_benchmark 2.0 Protocol: Redis - Clients: 50 - Set To Get Ratio: 10:1 Ops/sec > Higher Is Better r6g.4xlarge . 1072272.83 |===================================================== Redis 7.0.12 + memtier_benchmark 2.0 Protocol: Redis - Clients: 50 - Set To Get Ratio: 1:10 Ops/sec > Higher Is Better r6g.4xlarge . 1296678.95 |===================================================== Redis 7.0.12 + memtier_benchmark 2.0 Protocol: Redis - Clients: 500 - Set To Get Ratio: 1:1 Ops/sec > Higher Is Better r6g.4xlarge . 1244474.80 |===================================================== Redis 7.0.12 + memtier_benchmark 2.0 Protocol: Redis - Clients: 500 - Set To Get Ratio: 1:5 Ops/sec > Higher Is Better r6g.4xlarge . 1216162.20 |===================================================== Redis 7.0.12 + memtier_benchmark 2.0 Protocol: Redis - Clients: 500 - Set To Get Ratio: 5:1 Ops/sec > Higher Is Better r6g.4xlarge . 1163553.10 |===================================================== Redis 7.0.12 + memtier_benchmark 2.0 Protocol: Redis - Clients: 100 - Set To Get Ratio: 10:1 Ops/sec > Higher Is Better r6g.4xlarge . 919351.79 |====================================================== Redis 7.0.12 + memtier_benchmark 2.0 Protocol: Redis - Clients: 100 - Set To Get Ratio: 1:10 Ops/sec > Higher Is Better r6g.4xlarge . 1102905.86 |===================================================== Redis 7.0.12 + memtier_benchmark 2.0 Protocol: Redis - Clients: 500 - Set To Get Ratio: 10:1 Ops/sec > Higher Is Better r6g.4xlarge . 1163292.46 |===================================================== Redis 7.0.12 + memtier_benchmark 2.0 Protocol: Redis - Clients: 500 - Set To Get Ratio: 1:10 Ops/sec > Higher Is Better r6g.4xlarge . 1239372.06 |===================================================== nginx 1.23.2 Connections: 1 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better nginx 1.23.2 Connections: 20 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better r6g.4xlarge . 39441.33 |======================================================= nginx 1.23.2 Connections: 100 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better r6g.4xlarge . 44934.26 |======================================================= nginx 1.23.2 Connections: 200 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better r6g.4xlarge . 46386.48 |======================================================= nginx 1.23.2 Connections: 500 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better r6g.4xlarge . 46400.13 |======================================================= nginx 1.23.2 Connections: 1000 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better r6g.4xlarge . 46502.49 |======================================================= nginx 1.23.2 Connections: 4000 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better r6g.4xlarge . 41597.09 |======================================================= OpenSSL 3.1 Algorithm: RSA4096 sign/s > Higher Is Better r6g.4xlarge . 662.4 |========================================================== OpenSSL 3.1 Algorithm: RSA4096 verify/s > Higher Is Better r6g.4xlarge . 53955.6 |======================================================== PyPerformance 1.0.0 Benchmark: go Milliseconds < Lower Is Better r6g.4xlarge . 419 |============================================================ PyPerformance 1.0.0 Benchmark: 2to3 Milliseconds < Lower Is Better r6g.4xlarge . 523 |============================================================ PyPerformance 1.0.0 Benchmark: chaos Milliseconds < Lower Is Better r6g.4xlarge . 178 |============================================================ PyPerformance 1.0.0 Benchmark: float Milliseconds < Lower Is Better r6g.4xlarge . 211 |============================================================ PyPerformance 1.0.0 Benchmark: nbody Milliseconds < Lower Is Better r6g.4xlarge . 227 |============================================================ PyPerformance 1.0.0 Benchmark: pathlib Milliseconds < Lower Is Better r6g.4xlarge . 31.4 |=========================================================== PyPerformance 1.0.0 Benchmark: raytrace Milliseconds < Lower Is Better r6g.4xlarge . 843 |============================================================ PyPerformance 1.0.0 Benchmark: json_loads Milliseconds < Lower Is Better r6g.4xlarge . 40.2 |=========================================================== PyPerformance 1.0.0 Benchmark: crypto_pyaes Milliseconds < Lower Is Better r6g.4xlarge . 192 |============================================================ PyPerformance 1.0.0 Benchmark: regex_compile Milliseconds < Lower Is Better r6g.4xlarge . 249 |============================================================ PyPerformance 1.0.0 Benchmark: python_startup Milliseconds < Lower Is Better r6g.4xlarge . 13.6 |=========================================================== PyPerformance 1.0.0 Benchmark: django_template Milliseconds < Lower Is Better r6g.4xlarge . 81.4 |=========================================================== PyPerformance 1.0.0 Benchmark: pickle_pure_python Milliseconds < Lower Is Better r6g.4xlarge . 763 |============================================================ Renaissance 0.14 Test: Scala Dotty ms < Lower Is Better Renaissance 0.14 Test: Random Forest ms < Lower Is Better Renaissance 0.14 Test: ALS Movie Lens ms < Lower Is Better Renaissance 0.14 Test: Apache Spark ALS ms < Lower Is Better Renaissance 0.14 Test: Apache Spark Bayes ms < Lower Is Better Renaissance 0.14 Test: Savina Reactors.IO ms < Lower Is Better Renaissance 0.14 Test: Apache Spark PageRank ms < Lower Is Better Renaissance 0.14 Test: Finagle HTTP Requests ms < Lower Is Better Renaissance 0.14 Test: In-Memory Database Shootout ms < Lower Is Better Renaissance 0.14 Test: Akka Unbalanced Cobwebbed Tree ms < Lower Is Better Renaissance 0.14 Test: Genetic Algorithm Using Jenetics + Futures ms < Lower Is Better DaCapo Benchmark 23.11 Java Test: Jython msec < Lower Is Better DaCapo Benchmark 23.11 Java Test: Eclipse msec < Lower Is Better DaCapo Benchmark 23.11 Java Test: GraphChi msec < Lower Is Better DaCapo Benchmark 23.11 Java Test: Tradesoap msec < Lower Is Better DaCapo Benchmark 23.11 Java Test: Tradebeans msec < Lower Is Better DaCapo Benchmark 23.11 Java Test: Spring Boot msec < Lower Is Better DaCapo Benchmark 23.11 Java Test: Apache Kafka msec < Lower Is Better DaCapo Benchmark 23.11 Java Test: Apache Tomcat msec < Lower Is Better DaCapo Benchmark 23.11 Java Test: jMonkeyEngine msec < Lower Is Better DaCapo Benchmark 23.11 Java Test: Apache Cassandra msec < Lower Is Better DaCapo Benchmark 23.11 Java Test: Apache Xalan XSLT msec < Lower Is Better DaCapo Benchmark 23.11 Java Test: Batik SVG Toolkit msec < Lower Is Better DaCapo Benchmark 23.11 Java Test: H2 Database Engine msec < Lower Is Better DaCapo Benchmark 23.11 Java Test: FOP Print Formatter msec < Lower Is Better DaCapo Benchmark 23.11 Java Test: PMD Source Code Analyzer msec < Lower Is Better DaCapo Benchmark 23.11 Java Test: Apache Lucene Search Index msec < Lower Is Better DaCapo Benchmark 23.11 Java Test: Apache Lucene Search Engine msec < Lower Is Better DaCapo Benchmark 23.11 Java Test: Avrora AVR Simulation Framework msec < Lower Is Better DaCapo Benchmark 23.11 Java Test: BioJava Biological Data Framework msec < Lower Is Better DaCapo Benchmark 23.11 Java Test: Zxing 1D/2D Barcode Image Processing msec < Lower Is Better DaCapo Benchmark 23.11 Java Test: H2O In-Memory Platform For Machine Learning msec < Lower Is Better CppPerformanceBenchmarks 9 Test: Atol Seconds < Lower Is Better r6g.4xlarge . 90.40 |========================================================== CppPerformanceBenchmarks 9 Test: Ctype Seconds < Lower Is Better r6g.4xlarge . 77.43 |========================================================== CppPerformanceBenchmarks 9 Test: Math Library Seconds < Lower Is Better r6g.4xlarge . 513.44 |========================================================= CppPerformanceBenchmarks 9 Test: Random Numbers Seconds < Lower Is Better r6g.4xlarge . 1527.68 |======================================================== CppPerformanceBenchmarks 9 Test: Stepanov Vector Seconds < Lower Is Better r6g.4xlarge . 103.33 |========================================================= CppPerformanceBenchmarks 9 Test: Function Objects Seconds < Lower Is Better r6g.4xlarge . 17.38 |========================================================== CppPerformanceBenchmarks 9 Test: Stepanov Abstraction Seconds < Lower Is Better r6g.4xlarge . 39.51 |========================================================== Smallpt 1.0 Global Illumination Renderer; 128 Samples Seconds < Lower Is Better r6g.4xlarge . 10.43 |========================================================== C-Ray 1.1 Total Time - 4K, 16 Rays Per Pixel Seconds < Lower Is Better r6g.4xlarge . 62.02 |==========================================================