amazon testing on Amazon Linux 2023.4.20240401 via the Phoronix Test Suite.
Compare your own system(s) to this result file with the
Phoronix Test Suite by running the command:
phoronix-test-suite benchmark 2404106-NE-R54XLARGE00
r5.4xlarge
amazon testing on Amazon Linux 2023.4.20240401 via the Phoronix Test Suite.
r5.4xlarge:
Processor: Intel Xeon Platinum 8259CL (8 Cores / 16 Threads), Motherboard: Amazon EC2 r5.4xlarge (1.0 BIOS), Chipset: Intel 440FX 82441FX PMC, Memory: 1 x 128 GB DDR4-2933MT/s, Disk: 215GB Amazon Elastic Block Store, Network: Amazon Elastic
OS: Amazon Linux 2023.4.20240401, Kernel: 6.1.82-99.168.amzn2023.x86_64 (x86_64), Compiler: GCC 11.4.1 20230605, File-System: xfs, System Layer: amazon
Stream 2013-01-17
Type: Copy
MB/s > Higher Is Better
r5.4xlarge . 84703.6 |=========================================================
Stream 2013-01-17
Type: Scale
MB/s > Higher Is Better
r5.4xlarge . 64499.0 |=========================================================
Stream 2013-01-17
Type: Triad
MB/s > Higher Is Better
r5.4xlarge . 71377.4 |=========================================================
Stream 2013-01-17
Type: Add
MB/s > Higher Is Better
r5.4xlarge . 71470.9 |=========================================================
Intel Memory Latency Checker 3.10
Test: Idle Latency
ns < Lower Is Better
r5.4xlarge . 90.0 |============================================================
Intel Memory Latency Checker 3.10
Test: Max Bandwidth - All Reads
MB/s > Higher Is Better
r5.4xlarge . 91215.65 |========================================================
Intel Memory Latency Checker 3.10
Test: Max Bandwidth - 3:1 Reads-Writes
MB/s > Higher Is Better
r5.4xlarge . 96351.88 |========================================================
Intel Memory Latency Checker 3.10
Test: Max Bandwidth - 2:1 Reads-Writes
MB/s > Higher Is Better
r5.4xlarge . 96249.85 |========================================================
Intel Memory Latency Checker 3.10
Test: Max Bandwidth - 1:1 Reads-Writes
MB/s > Higher Is Better
r5.4xlarge . 97010.00 |========================================================
Intel Memory Latency Checker 3.10
Test: Max Bandwidth - Stream-Triad Like
MB/s > Higher Is Better
r5.4xlarge . 89342.10 |========================================================
Intel Memory Latency Checker 3.10
Test: Peak Injection Bandwidth - All Reads
MB/s > Higher Is Better
r5.4xlarge . 90835.8 |=========================================================
Intel Memory Latency Checker 3.10
Test: Peak Injection Bandwidth - 3:1 Reads-Writes
MB/s > Higher Is Better
r5.4xlarge . 94890.6 |=========================================================
Intel Memory Latency Checker 3.10
Test: Peak Injection Bandwidth - 2:1 Reads-Writes
MB/s > Higher Is Better
r5.4xlarge . 92818.7 |=========================================================
Intel Memory Latency Checker 3.10
Test: Peak Injection Bandwidth - 1:1 Reads-Writes
MB/s > Higher Is Better
r5.4xlarge . 86504.5 |=========================================================
Intel Memory Latency Checker 3.10
Test: Peak Injection Bandwidth - Stream-Triad Like
MB/s > Higher Is Better
r5.4xlarge . 85760.6 |=========================================================
CacheBench
Test: Read
MB/s > Higher Is Better
r5.4xlarge . 5901.42 |=========================================================
CacheBench
Test: Write
MB/s > Higher Is Better
r5.4xlarge . 40219.22 |========================================================
CacheBench
Test: Read / Modify / Write
MB/s > Higher Is Better
r5.4xlarge . 67823.98 |========================================================
GNU GMP GMPbench 6.2.1
GMPbench Score > Higher Is Better
Zstd Compression 1.5.4
Compression Level: 3 - Compression Speed
MB/s > Higher Is Better
r5.4xlarge . 1273.5 |==========================================================
Zstd Compression 1.5.4
Compression Level: 3 - Decompression Speed
MB/s > Higher Is Better
r5.4xlarge . 777.9 |===========================================================
Zstd Compression 1.5.4
Compression Level: 8 - Compression Speed
MB/s > Higher Is Better
r5.4xlarge . 322.8 |===========================================================
Zstd Compression 1.5.4
Compression Level: 8 - Decompression Speed
MB/s > Higher Is Better
r5.4xlarge . 817.7 |===========================================================
Zstd Compression 1.5.4
Compression Level: 12 - Compression Speed
MB/s > Higher Is Better
r5.4xlarge . 126.7 |===========================================================
Zstd Compression 1.5.4
Compression Level: 12 - Decompression Speed
MB/s > Higher Is Better
r5.4xlarge . 781.5 |===========================================================
Zstd Compression 1.5.4
Compression Level: 19 - Compression Speed
MB/s > Higher Is Better
r5.4xlarge . 10.3 |============================================================
Zstd Compression 1.5.4
Compression Level: 19 - Decompression Speed
MB/s > Higher Is Better
r5.4xlarge . 671.0 |===========================================================
Zstd Compression 1.5.4
Compression Level: 3, Long Mode - Compression Speed
MB/s > Higher Is Better
r5.4xlarge . 681.6 |===========================================================
Zstd Compression 1.5.4
Compression Level: 3, Long Mode - Decompression Speed
MB/s > Higher Is Better
r5.4xlarge . 807.6 |===========================================================
Zstd Compression 1.5.4
Compression Level: 8, Long Mode - Compression Speed
MB/s > Higher Is Better
r5.4xlarge . 342.2 |===========================================================
Zstd Compression 1.5.4
Compression Level: 8, Long Mode - Decompression Speed
MB/s > Higher Is Better
r5.4xlarge . 826.6 |===========================================================
Zstd Compression 1.5.4
Compression Level: 19, Long Mode - Compression Speed
MB/s > Higher Is Better
r5.4xlarge . 5.37 |============================================================
Zstd Compression 1.5.4
Compression Level: 19, Long Mode - Decompression Speed
MB/s > Higher Is Better
r5.4xlarge . 650.3 |===========================================================
LZ4 Compression 1.9.4
Compression Level: 1 - Compression Speed
MB/s > Higher Is Better
r5.4xlarge . 431.07 |==========================================================
LZ4 Compression 1.9.4
Compression Level: 1 - Decompression Speed
MB/s > Higher Is Better
r5.4xlarge . 2521.9 |==========================================================
LZ4 Compression 1.9.4
Compression Level: 3 - Compression Speed
MB/s > Higher Is Better
r5.4xlarge . 70.77 |===========================================================
LZ4 Compression 1.9.4
Compression Level: 3 - Decompression Speed
MB/s > Higher Is Better
r5.4xlarge . 2354.7 |==========================================================
LZ4 Compression 1.9.4
Compression Level: 9 - Compression Speed
MB/s > Higher Is Better
r5.4xlarge . 24.59 |===========================================================
LZ4 Compression 1.9.4
Compression Level: 9 - Decompression Speed
MB/s > Higher Is Better
r5.4xlarge . 2464.9 |==========================================================
OpenSSL 3.1
Algorithm: SHA256
byte/s > Higher Is Better
r5.4xlarge . 2147501110 |======================================================
OpenSSL 3.1
Algorithm: SHA512
byte/s > Higher Is Better
r5.4xlarge . 2397065050 |======================================================
OpenSSL 3.1
Algorithm: RSA4096
sign/s > Higher Is Better
r5.4xlarge . 1884.4 |==========================================================
OpenSSL 3.1
Algorithm: RSA4096
verify/s > Higher Is Better
r5.4xlarge . 124488.5 |========================================================
OpenSSL 3.1
Algorithm: ChaCha20
byte/s > Higher Is Better
r5.4xlarge . 34805518700 |=====================================================
OpenSSL 3.1
Algorithm: AES-128-GCM
byte/s > Higher Is Better
r5.4xlarge . 37949298003 |=====================================================
OpenSSL 3.1
Algorithm: AES-256-GCM
byte/s > Higher Is Better
r5.4xlarge . 27673820453 |=====================================================
OpenSSL 3.1
Algorithm: ChaCha20-Poly1305
byte/s > Higher Is Better
r5.4xlarge . 17887037850 |=====================================================
Botan 2.17.3
Test: KASUMI
MiB/s > Higher Is Better
r5.4xlarge . 68.33 |===========================================================
Botan 2.17.3
Test: KASUMI - Decrypt
MiB/s > Higher Is Better
r5.4xlarge . 66.89 |===========================================================
Botan 2.17.3
Test: AES-256
MiB/s > Higher Is Better
r5.4xlarge . 2887.51 |=========================================================
Botan 2.17.3
Test: AES-256 - Decrypt
MiB/s > Higher Is Better
r5.4xlarge . 2892.63 |=========================================================
Botan 2.17.3
Test: Twofish
MiB/s > Higher Is Better
r5.4xlarge . 246.83 |==========================================================
Botan 2.17.3
Test: Twofish - Decrypt
MiB/s > Higher Is Better
r5.4xlarge . 245.72 |==========================================================
Botan 2.17.3
Test: Blowfish
MiB/s > Higher Is Better
r5.4xlarge . 300.66 |==========================================================
Botan 2.17.3
Test: Blowfish - Decrypt
MiB/s > Higher Is Better
r5.4xlarge . 296.83 |==========================================================
Botan 2.17.3
Test: CAST-256
MiB/s > Higher Is Better
r5.4xlarge . 102.63 |==========================================================
Botan 2.17.3
Test: CAST-256 - Decrypt
MiB/s > Higher Is Better
r5.4xlarge . 102.69 |==========================================================
Botan 2.17.3
Test: ChaCha20Poly1305
MiB/s > Higher Is Better
r5.4xlarge . 565.10 |==========================================================
Botan 2.17.3
Test: ChaCha20Poly1305 - Decrypt
MiB/s > Higher Is Better
r5.4xlarge . 560.47 |==========================================================
x264 2022-02-22
Video Input: Bosphorus 4K
Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better
r5.4xlarge . 16.08 |===========================================================
x264 2022-02-22
Video Input: Bosphorus 1080p
Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better
r5.4xlarge . 68.43 |===========================================================
x265 3.6
Video Input: Bosphorus 4K
Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better
r5.4xlarge . 7.70 |============================================================
x265 3.6
Video Input: Bosphorus 1080p
Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better
r5.4xlarge . 37.07 |===========================================================
PyPerformance 1.0.0
Benchmark: go
Milliseconds < Lower Is Better
r5.4xlarge . 388 |=============================================================
PyPerformance 1.0.0
Benchmark: 2to3
Milliseconds < Lower Is Better
r5.4xlarge . 467 |=============================================================
PyPerformance 1.0.0
Benchmark: chaos
Milliseconds < Lower Is Better
r5.4xlarge . 174 |=============================================================
PyPerformance 1.0.0
Benchmark: float
Milliseconds < Lower Is Better
r5.4xlarge . 187 |=============================================================
PyPerformance 1.0.0
Benchmark: nbody
Milliseconds < Lower Is Better
r5.4xlarge . 221 |=============================================================
PyPerformance 1.0.0
Benchmark: pathlib
Milliseconds < Lower Is Better
r5.4xlarge . 26.1 |============================================================
PyPerformance 1.0.0
Benchmark: raytrace
Milliseconds < Lower Is Better
r5.4xlarge . 767 |=============================================================
PyPerformance 1.0.0
Benchmark: json_loads
Milliseconds < Lower Is Better
r5.4xlarge . 36.9 |============================================================
PyPerformance 1.0.0
Benchmark: crypto_pyaes
Milliseconds < Lower Is Better
r5.4xlarge . 178 |=============================================================
PyPerformance 1.0.0
Benchmark: regex_compile
Milliseconds < Lower Is Better
r5.4xlarge . 257 |=============================================================
PyPerformance 1.0.0
Benchmark: python_startup
Milliseconds < Lower Is Better
r5.4xlarge . 12.0 |============================================================
PyPerformance 1.0.0
Benchmark: django_template
Milliseconds < Lower Is Better
r5.4xlarge . 71.8 |============================================================
PyPerformance 1.0.0
Benchmark: pickle_pure_python
Milliseconds < Lower Is Better
r5.4xlarge . 679 |=============================================================
CppPerformanceBenchmarks 9
Test: Atol
Seconds < Lower Is Better
r5.4xlarge . 89.15 |===========================================================
CppPerformanceBenchmarks 9
Test: Ctype
Seconds < Lower Is Better
r5.4xlarge . 40.43 |===========================================================
CppPerformanceBenchmarks 9
Test: Math Library
Seconds < Lower Is Better
r5.4xlarge . 413.67 |==========================================================
CppPerformanceBenchmarks 9
Test: Random Numbers
Seconds < Lower Is Better
r5.4xlarge . 1283.16 |=========================================================
CppPerformanceBenchmarks 9
Test: Stepanov Vector
Seconds < Lower Is Better
r5.4xlarge . 120.93 |==========================================================
CppPerformanceBenchmarks 9
Test: Function Objects
Seconds < Lower Is Better
r5.4xlarge . 18.99 |===========================================================
CppPerformanceBenchmarks 9
Test: Stepanov Abstraction
Seconds < Lower Is Better
r5.4xlarge . 47.80 |===========================================================
GraphicsMagick 1.3.43
Operation: Swirl
Iterations Per Minute > Higher Is Better
r5.4xlarge . 64 |==============================================================
GraphicsMagick 1.3.43
Operation: Rotate
Iterations Per Minute > Higher Is Better
r5.4xlarge . 116 |=============================================================
GraphicsMagick 1.3.43
Operation: Sharpen
Iterations Per Minute > Higher Is Better
r5.4xlarge . 20 |==============================================================
GraphicsMagick 1.3.43
Operation: Enhanced
Iterations Per Minute > Higher Is Better
r5.4xlarge . 27 |==============================================================
GraphicsMagick 1.3.43
Operation: Resizing
Iterations Per Minute > Higher Is Better
r5.4xlarge . 135 |=============================================================
GraphicsMagick 1.3.43
Operation: Noise-Gaussian
Iterations Per Minute > Higher Is Better
r5.4xlarge . 35 |==============================================================
GraphicsMagick 1.3.43
Operation: HWB Color Space
Iterations Per Minute > Higher Is Better
r5.4xlarge . 131 |=============================================================
Smallpt 1.0
Global Illumination Renderer; 128 Samples
Seconds < Lower Is Better
r5.4xlarge . 15.52 |===========================================================
Stockfish 16.1
Chess Benchmark
Nodes Per Second > Higher Is Better
r5.4xlarge . 9643551 |=========================================================
C-Ray 1.1
Total Time - 4K, 16 Rays Per Pixel
Seconds < Lower Is Better
r5.4xlarge . 109.18 |==========================================================
SciMark 2.0
Computational Test: Composite
Mflops > Higher Is Better
r5.4xlarge . 492.91 |==========================================================
SciMark 2.0
Computational Test: Monte Carlo
Mflops > Higher Is Better
r5.4xlarge . 106.71 |==========================================================
SciMark 2.0
Computational Test: Fast Fourier Transform
Mflops > Higher Is Better
r5.4xlarge . 226.20 |==========================================================
SciMark 2.0
Computational Test: Sparse Matrix Multiply
Mflops > Higher Is Better
r5.4xlarge . 561.25 |==========================================================
SciMark 2.0
Computational Test: Dense LU Matrix Factorization
Mflops > Higher Is Better
r5.4xlarge . 694.39 |==========================================================
SciMark 2.0
Computational Test: Jacobi Successive Over-Relaxation
Mflops > Higher Is Better
r5.4xlarge . 875.98 |==========================================================
Renaissance 0.14
Test: Scala Dotty
ms < Lower Is Better
Renaissance 0.14
Test: Random Forest
ms < Lower Is Better
Renaissance 0.14
Test: ALS Movie Lens
ms < Lower Is Better
Renaissance 0.14
Test: Apache Spark ALS
ms < Lower Is Better
Renaissance 0.14
Test: Apache Spark Bayes
ms < Lower Is Better
Renaissance 0.14
Test: Savina Reactors.IO
ms < Lower Is Better
Renaissance 0.14
Test: Apache Spark PageRank
ms < Lower Is Better
Renaissance 0.14
Test: Finagle HTTP Requests
ms < Lower Is Better
Renaissance 0.14
Test: In-Memory Database Shootout
ms < Lower Is Better
Renaissance 0.14
Test: Akka Unbalanced Cobwebbed Tree
ms < Lower Is Better
Renaissance 0.14
Test: Genetic Algorithm Using Jenetics + Futures
ms < Lower Is Better
DaCapo Benchmark 23.11
Java Test: Jython
msec < Lower Is Better
DaCapo Benchmark 23.11
Java Test: Eclipse
msec < Lower Is Better
DaCapo Benchmark 23.11
Java Test: GraphChi
msec < Lower Is Better
DaCapo Benchmark 23.11
Java Test: Tradesoap
msec < Lower Is Better
DaCapo Benchmark 23.11
Java Test: Tradebeans
msec < Lower Is Better
DaCapo Benchmark 23.11
Java Test: Spring Boot
msec < Lower Is Better
DaCapo Benchmark 23.11
Java Test: Apache Kafka
msec < Lower Is Better
DaCapo Benchmark 23.11
Java Test: Apache Tomcat
msec < Lower Is Better
DaCapo Benchmark 23.11
Java Test: jMonkeyEngine
msec < Lower Is Better
DaCapo Benchmark 23.11
Java Test: Apache Cassandra
msec < Lower Is Better
DaCapo Benchmark 23.11
Java Test: Apache Xalan XSLT
msec < Lower Is Better
DaCapo Benchmark 23.11
Java Test: Batik SVG Toolkit
msec < Lower Is Better
DaCapo Benchmark 23.11
Java Test: H2 Database Engine
msec < Lower Is Better
DaCapo Benchmark 23.11
Java Test: FOP Print Formatter
msec < Lower Is Better
DaCapo Benchmark 23.11
Java Test: PMD Source Code Analyzer
msec < Lower Is Better
DaCapo Benchmark 23.11
Java Test: Apache Lucene Search Index
msec < Lower Is Better
DaCapo Benchmark 23.11
Java Test: Apache Lucene Search Engine
msec < Lower Is Better
DaCapo Benchmark 23.11
Java Test: Avrora AVR Simulation Framework
msec < Lower Is Better
DaCapo Benchmark 23.11
Java Test: BioJava Biological Data Framework
msec < Lower Is Better
DaCapo Benchmark 23.11
Java Test: Zxing 1D/2D Barcode Image Processing
msec < Lower Is Better
DaCapo Benchmark 23.11
Java Test: H2O In-Memory Platform For Machine Learning
msec < Lower Is Better
BlogBench 1.1
Test: Read
Final Score > Higher Is Better
r5.4xlarge . 2410482 |=========================================================
BlogBench 1.1
Test: Write
Final Score > Higher Is Better
r5.4xlarge . 10569 |===========================================================
nginx 1.23.2
Connections: 1
Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better
nginx 1.23.2
Connections: 20
Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better
r5.4xlarge . 40042.38 |========================================================
nginx 1.23.2
Connections: 100
Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better
r5.4xlarge . 45638.33 |========================================================
nginx 1.23.2
Connections: 200
Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better
r5.4xlarge . 46019.07 |========================================================
nginx 1.23.2
Connections: 500
Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better
r5.4xlarge . 44379.39 |========================================================
nginx 1.23.2
Connections: 1000
Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better
r5.4xlarge . 42862.39 |========================================================
nginx 1.23.2
Connections: 4000
Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better
r5.4xlarge . 40920.26 |========================================================
Redis 7.0.12 + memtier_benchmark 2.0
Protocol: Redis - Clients: 50 - Set To Get Ratio: 1:1
Ops/sec > Higher Is Better
r5.4xlarge . 1586149.75 |======================================================
Redis 7.0.12 + memtier_benchmark 2.0
Protocol: Redis - Clients: 50 - Set To Get Ratio: 1:5
Ops/sec > Higher Is Better
r5.4xlarge . 1696597.16 |======================================================
Redis 7.0.12 + memtier_benchmark 2.0
Protocol: Redis - Clients: 50 - Set To Get Ratio: 5:1
Ops/sec > Higher Is Better
r5.4xlarge . 1443386.97 |======================================================
Redis 7.0.12 + memtier_benchmark 2.0
Protocol: Redis - Clients: 100 - Set To Get Ratio: 1:1
Ops/sec > Higher Is Better
r5.4xlarge . 1468305.38 |======================================================
Redis 7.0.12 + memtier_benchmark 2.0
Protocol: Redis - Clients: 100 - Set To Get Ratio: 1:5
Ops/sec > Higher Is Better
r5.4xlarge . 1599986.41 |======================================================
Redis 7.0.12 + memtier_benchmark 2.0
Protocol: Redis - Clients: 100 - Set To Get Ratio: 5:1
Ops/sec > Higher Is Better
r5.4xlarge . 1415631.65 |======================================================
Redis 7.0.12 + memtier_benchmark 2.0
Protocol: Redis - Clients: 50 - Set To Get Ratio: 10:1
Ops/sec > Higher Is Better
r5.4xlarge . 1377985.95 |======================================================
Redis 7.0.12 + memtier_benchmark 2.0
Protocol: Redis - Clients: 50 - Set To Get Ratio: 1:10
Ops/sec > Higher Is Better
r5.4xlarge . 1541158.58 |======================================================
Redis 7.0.12 + memtier_benchmark 2.0
Protocol: Redis - Clients: 500 - Set To Get Ratio: 1:1
Ops/sec > Higher Is Better
r5.4xlarge . 1338486.05 |======================================================
Redis 7.0.12 + memtier_benchmark 2.0
Protocol: Redis - Clients: 500 - Set To Get Ratio: 1:5
Ops/sec > Higher Is Better
r5.4xlarge . 1410244.64 |======================================================
Redis 7.0.12 + memtier_benchmark 2.0
Protocol: Redis - Clients: 500 - Set To Get Ratio: 5:1
Ops/sec > Higher Is Better
r5.4xlarge . 1239692.43 |======================================================
Redis 7.0.12 + memtier_benchmark 2.0
Protocol: Redis - Clients: 100 - Set To Get Ratio: 10:1
Ops/sec > Higher Is Better
r5.4xlarge . 1350197.45 |======================================================
Redis 7.0.12 + memtier_benchmark 2.0
Protocol: Redis - Clients: 100 - Set To Get Ratio: 1:10
Ops/sec > Higher Is Better
r5.4xlarge . 1507444.16 |======================================================
Redis 7.0.12 + memtier_benchmark 2.0
Protocol: Redis - Clients: 500 - Set To Get Ratio: 10:1
Ops/sec > Higher Is Better
r5.4xlarge . 1232823.03 |======================================================
Redis 7.0.12 + memtier_benchmark 2.0
Protocol: Redis - Clients: 500 - Set To Get Ratio: 1:10
Ops/sec > Higher Is Better
r5.4xlarge . 1403099.37 |======================================================
Apache Cassandra 4.1.3
Test: Writes
Op/s > Higher Is Better
Apache Cassandra 4.1.3
Test: Mixed 1:1
Op/s > Higher Is Better
Apache Cassandra 4.1.3
Test: Mixed 1:3
Op/s > Higher Is Better