dlda

Intel Core i9-10980XE testing with a ASRock X299 Steel Legend (P1.50 BIOS) and llvmpipe on Ubuntu 22.04 via the Phoronix Test Suite.

Compare your own system(s) to this result file with the Phoronix Test Suite by running the command: phoronix-test-suite benchmark 2404068-PTS-DLDA180834
Jump To Table - Results

View

Do Not Show Noisy Results
Do Not Show Results With Incomplete Data
Do Not Show Results With Little Change/Spread
List Notable Results

Limit displaying results to tests within:

Timed Code Compilation 2 Tests
C/C++ Compiler Tests 2 Tests
CPU Massive 4 Tests
Creator Workloads 4 Tests
Encoding 2 Tests
HPC - High Performance Computing 2 Tests
Machine Learning 2 Tests
Multi-Core 5 Tests
Programmer / Developer System Benchmarks 2 Tests
Python Tests 3 Tests
Server CPU Tests 2 Tests
Video Encoding 2 Tests
Common Workstation Benchmarks 3 Tests

Statistics

Show Overall Harmonic Mean(s)
Show Overall Geometric Mean
Show Geometric Means Per-Suite/Category
Show Wins / Losses Counts (Pie Chart)
Normalize Results
Remove Outliers Before Calculating Averages

Graph Settings

Force Line Graphs Where Applicable
Convert To Scalar Where Applicable
Prefer Vertical Bar Graphs

Multi-Way Comparison

Condense Multi-Option Tests Into Single Result Graphs

Table

Show Detailed System Result Table

Run Management

Highlight
Result
Hide
Result
Result
Identifier
Performance Per
Dollar
Date
Run
  Test
  Duration
a
April 06
  1 Hour, 47 Minutes
b
April 06
  1 Hour, 46 Minutes
Invert Hiding All Results Option
  1 Hour, 47 Minutes
Only show results matching title/arguments (delimit multiple options with a comma):
Do not show results matching title/arguments (delimit multiple options with a comma):

dlda Intel Core i9-10980XE testing with a ASRock X299 Steel Legend (P1.50 BIOS) and llvmpipe on Ubuntu 22.04 via the Phoronix Test Suite. a: Processor: Intel Core i9-10980XE @ 4.80GHz (18 Cores / 36 Threads), Motherboard: ASRock X299 Steel Legend (P1.50 BIOS), Chipset: Intel Sky Lake-E DMI3 Registers, Memory: 4 x 8GB DDR4-3600MT/s, Disk: Samsung SSD 970 PRO 512GB, Graphics: llvmpipe, Audio: Realtek ALC1220, Network: Intel I219-V + Intel I211 OS: Ubuntu 22.04, Kernel: 6.5.0-18-generic (x86_64), Desktop: GNOME Shell 42.2, Display Server: X Server 1.21.1.4, OpenGL: 4.5 Mesa 22.0.1 (LLVM 13.0.1 256 bits), Vulkan: 1.2.204, Compiler: GCC 11.4.0, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 1024x768 b: Processor: Intel Core i9-10980XE @ 4.80GHz (18 Cores / 36 Threads), Motherboard: ASRock X299 Steel Legend (P1.50 BIOS), Chipset: Intel Sky Lake-E DMI3 Registers, Memory: 4 x 8GB DDR4-3600MT/s, Disk: Samsung SSD 970 PRO 512GB, Graphics: llvmpipe, Audio: Realtek ALC1220, Network: Intel I219-V + Intel I211 OS: Ubuntu 22.04, Kernel: 6.5.0-18-generic (x86_64), Desktop: GNOME Shell 42.2, Display Server: X Server 1.21.1.4, OpenGL: 4.5 Mesa 22.0.1 (LLVM 13.0.1 256 bits), Vulkan: 1.2.204, Compiler: GCC 11.4.0, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 1024x768 SPECFEM3D 4.1.1 Model: Water-layered Halfspace Seconds < Lower Is Better a . 115.60 |=================================================================== b . 114.46 |================================================================== SPECFEM3D 4.1.1 Model: Homogeneous Halfspace Seconds < Lower Is Better a . 51.13 |==================================================================== b . 50.53 |=================================================================== SPECFEM3D 4.1.1 Model: Tomographic Model Seconds < Lower Is Better a . 40.10 |==================================================================== b . 40.08 |==================================================================== BRL-CAD 7.38.2 VGR Performance Metric VGR Performance Metric > Higher Is Better a . 211860 |=================================================================== b . 212029 |=================================================================== TensorFlow 2.16.1 Device: CPU - Batch Size: 1 - Model: AlexNet images/sec > Higher Is Better a . 14.37 |==================================================================== b . 14.39 |==================================================================== TensorFlow 2.16.1 Device: CPU - Batch Size: 16 - Model: AlexNet images/sec > Higher Is Better a . 153.21 |=================================================================== b . 153.76 |=================================================================== TensorFlow 2.16.1 Device: CPU - Batch Size: 32 - Model: AlexNet images/sec > Higher Is Better a . 235.74 |=================================================================== b . 235.64 |=================================================================== TensorFlow 2.16.1 Device: CPU - Batch Size: 64 - Model: AlexNet images/sec > Higher Is Better a . 287.38 |=================================================================== b . 287.56 |=================================================================== TensorFlow 2.16.1 Device: CPU - Batch Size: 1 - Model: GoogLeNet images/sec > Higher Is Better a . 51.39 |==================================================================== b . 50.57 |=================================================================== TensorFlow 2.16.1 Device: CPU - Batch Size: 1 - Model: ResNet-50 images/sec > Higher Is Better a . 14.49 |==================================================================== b . 14.55 |==================================================================== TensorFlow 2.16.1 Device: CPU - Batch Size: 16 - Model: GoogLeNet images/sec > Higher Is Better a . 128.18 |=================================================================== b . 128.02 |=================================================================== TensorFlow 2.16.1 Device: CPU - Batch Size: 16 - Model: ResNet-50 images/sec > Higher Is Better a . 40.06 |==================================================================== b . 40.10 |==================================================================== TensorFlow 2.16.1 Device: CPU - Batch Size: 32 - Model: GoogLeNet images/sec > Higher Is Better a . 128.10 |=================================================================== b . 128.31 |=================================================================== TensorFlow 2.16.1 Device: CPU - Batch Size: 32 - Model: ResNet-50 images/sec > Higher Is Better a . 41.22 |==================================================================== b . 41.20 |==================================================================== TensorFlow 2.16.1 Device: CPU - Batch Size: 64 - Model: GoogLeNet images/sec > Higher Is Better a . 125.69 |=================================================================== b . 125.80 |=================================================================== TensorFlow 2.16.1 Device: CPU - Batch Size: 64 - Model: ResNet-50 images/sec > Higher Is Better a . 41.59 |==================================================================== b . 41.56 |==================================================================== Llamafile 0.7 Test: llava-v1.5-7b-q4 - Acceleration: CPU Tokens Per Second > Higher Is Better a . 13.31 |==================================================================== b . 13.40 |==================================================================== Llamafile 0.7 Test: mistral-7b-instruct-v0.2.Q8_0 - Acceleration: CPU Tokens Per Second > Higher Is Better a . 9.49 |===================================================================== b . 9.51 |===================================================================== SPECFEM3D 4.1.1 Model: Layered Halfspace Seconds < Lower Is Better a . 112.49 |=================================================================== b . 111.67 |=================================================================== Llamafile 0.7 Test: wizardcoder-python-34b-v1.0.Q6_K - Acceleration: CPU Tokens Per Second > Higher Is Better a . 2.93 |===================================================================== b . 2.93 |===================================================================== Timed FFmpeg Compilation 7.0 Time To Compile Seconds < Lower Is Better a . 47.37 |==================================================================== b . 46.10 |================================================================== x265 3.6 Video Input: Bosphorus 4K Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better a . 20.86 |================================================================== b . 21.39 |==================================================================== x265 3.6 Video Input: Bosphorus 1080p Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better a . 29.37 |==================================================================== b . 29.29 |==================================================================== Blender 4.1 Blend File: BMW27 - Compute: CPU-Only Seconds < Lower Is Better a . 91.49 |==================================================================== b . 91.37 |==================================================================== Blender 4.1 Blend File: Junkshop - Compute: CPU-Only Seconds < Lower Is Better a . 117.60 |=================================================================== b . 115.25 |================================================================== Blender 4.1 Blend File: Classroom - Compute: CPU-Only Seconds < Lower Is Better a . 264.21 |=================================================================== b . 264.21 |=================================================================== Blender 4.1 Blend File: Fishy Cat - Compute: CPU-Only Seconds < Lower Is Better a . 120.60 |=================================================================== b . 120.75 |=================================================================== Blender 4.1 Blend File: Barbershop - Compute: CPU-Only Seconds < Lower Is Better a . 931.12 |=================================================================== b . 931.98 |=================================================================== Blender 4.1 Blend File: Pabellon Barcelona - Compute: CPU-Only Seconds < Lower Is Better a . 313.36 |================================================================= b . 320.82 |=================================================================== FFmpeg 7.0 Encoder: libx264 - Scenario: Live FPS > Higher Is Better a . 178.34 |=================================================================== b . 177.16 |=================================================================== FFmpeg 7.0 Encoder: libx265 - Scenario: Live FPS > Higher Is Better a . 41.09 |==================================================================== b . 41.20 |==================================================================== FFmpeg 7.0 Encoder: libx264 - Scenario: Upload FPS > Higher Is Better a . 11.15 |==================================================================== b . 11.18 |==================================================================== FFmpeg 7.0 Encoder: libx265 - Scenario: Upload FPS > Higher Is Better a . 9.17 |===================================================================== b . 9.08 |==================================================================== FFmpeg 7.0 Encoder: libx264 - Scenario: Platform FPS > Higher Is Better a . 41.55 |==================================================================== b . 41.63 |==================================================================== FFmpeg 7.0 Encoder: libx265 - Scenario: Platform FPS > Higher Is Better a . 17.77 |==================================================================== b . 17.72 |==================================================================== FFmpeg 7.0 Encoder: libx265 - Scenario: Video On Demand FPS > Higher Is Better a . 17.80 |==================================================================== b . 17.78 |==================================================================== Timed Mesa Compilation 24.0 Time To Compile Seconds < Lower Is Better a . 26.37 |==================================================================== b . 25.53 |================================================================== RocksDB 9.0 Test: Overwrite Op/s > Higher Is Better a . 1117358 |================================================================== b . 1121724 |================================================================== RocksDB 9.0 Test: Random Fill Op/s > Higher Is Better a . 1122751 |================================================================== b . 1128064 |================================================================== RocksDB 9.0 Test: Random Read Op/s > Higher Is Better a . 74178255 |================================================================= b . 73039420 |================================================================ RocksDB 9.0 Test: Update Random Op/s > Higher Is Better a . 633669 |=================================================================== b . 631933 |=================================================================== RocksDB 9.0 Test: Sequential Fill Op/s > Higher Is Better a . 1307492 |================================================================= b . 1326770 |================================================================== RocksDB 9.0 Test: Random Fill Sync Op/s > Higher Is Better a . 4670 |===================================================================== b . 4668 |===================================================================== RocksDB 9.0 Test: Read While Writing Op/s > Higher Is Better a . 3741170 |================================================================== b . 3698117 |================================================================= RocksDB 9.0 Test: Read Random Write Random Op/s > Higher Is Better a . 2423455 |================================================================== b . 2425448 |================================================================== SPECFEM3D 4.1.1 Model: Mount St. Helens Seconds < Lower Is Better a . 42.51 |==================================================================== b . 42.47 |==================================================================== FFmpeg 7.0 Encoder: libx264 - Scenario: Video On Demand FPS > Higher Is Better a . 41.62 |==================================================================== b . 41.63 |====================================================================