ptsopenclbenchmark
Intel Core i9-13980HX testing with a MSI MS-17S1 (E17S1IMS.30D BIOS) and MSI Intel RPL-S 16GB on Ubuntu 22.04 via the Phoronix Test Suite.


pts_opencl_benchmark: 

	Processor: Intel Core i9-13980HX @ 5.60GHz (24 Cores / 32 Threads), Motherboard: MSI MS-17S1 (E17S1IMS.30D BIOS), Chipset: Intel Device 7a27, Memory: 32GB, Disk: 2048GB Micron_3400_MTFDKBA2T0TFH, Graphics: MSI Intel RPL-S 16GB (210/405MHz), Audio: Intel Device 7a50, Monitor: PA248, Network: Realtek RTL8125 2.5GbE + Intel Device 7a70

	OS: Ubuntu 22.04, Kernel: 6.5.0-26-generic (x86_64), Desktop: Cinnamon 5.2.7, Display Server: X Server 1.21.1.4, Display Driver: NVIDIA 535.161.07, OpenGL: 4.6 Mesa 23.2.1-1ubuntu3.1~22.04.2, OpenCL: OpenCL 3.0 CUDA 12.2.148, Vulkan: 1.3.255, Compiler: GCC 11.4.0 + CUDA 12.2, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 1920x1200


SHOC Scalable HeterOgeneous Computing 2020-04-17
Target: OpenCL - Benchmark: S3D
GFLOPS > Higher Is Better
pts_opencl_benchmark . 367.73 |================================================


SHOC Scalable HeterOgeneous Computing 2020-04-17
Target: OpenCL - Benchmark: Triad
GB/s > Higher Is Better
pts_opencl_benchmark . 12.78 |=================================================


SHOC Scalable HeterOgeneous Computing 2020-04-17
Target: OpenCL - Benchmark: FFT SP
GFLOPS > Higher Is Better
pts_opencl_benchmark . 1539.83 |===============================================


SHOC Scalable HeterOgeneous Computing 2020-04-17
Target: OpenCL - Benchmark: MD5 Hash
GHash/s > Higher Is Better
pts_opencl_benchmark . 45.74 |=================================================


SHOC Scalable HeterOgeneous Computing 2020-04-17
Target: OpenCL - Benchmark: Reduction
GB/s > Higher Is Better
pts_opencl_benchmark . 541.91 |================================================


SHOC Scalable HeterOgeneous Computing 2020-04-17
Target: OpenCL - Benchmark: GEMM SGEMM_N
GFLOPS > Higher Is Better
pts_opencl_benchmark . 13385.5 |===============================================


SHOC Scalable HeterOgeneous Computing 2020-04-17
Target: OpenCL - Benchmark: Max SP Flops
GFLOPS > Higher Is Better
pts_opencl_benchmark . 44825.1 |===============================================


SHOC Scalable HeterOgeneous Computing 2020-04-17
Target: OpenCL - Benchmark: Bus Speed Download
GB/s > Higher Is Better
pts_opencl_benchmark . 12.92 |=================================================


SHOC Scalable HeterOgeneous Computing 2020-04-17
Target: OpenCL - Benchmark: Bus Speed Readback
GB/s > Higher Is Better
pts_opencl_benchmark . 13.19 |=================================================


SHOC Scalable HeterOgeneous Computing 2020-04-17
Target: OpenCL - Benchmark: Texture Read Bandwidth
GB/s > Higher Is Better
pts_opencl_benchmark . 2491.20 |===============================================


cl-mem 2017-01-13
Benchmark: Copy
GB/s > Higher Is Better
pts_opencl_benchmark . 345.7 |=================================================


cl-mem 2017-01-13
Benchmark: Read
GB/s > Higher Is Better
pts_opencl_benchmark . 521.1 |=================================================


cl-mem 2017-01-13
Benchmark: Write
GB/s > Higher Is Better
pts_opencl_benchmark . 514.8 |=================================================


FluidX3D 2.9
Test: FP32-FP32
MLUPs/s > Higher Is Better
pts_opencl_benchmark . 3357 |==================================================


FluidX3D 2.9
Test: FP32-FP16C
MLUPs/s > Higher Is Better
pts_opencl_benchmark . 6880 |==================================================


FluidX3D 2.9
Test: FP32-FP16S
MLUPs/s > Higher Is Better
pts_opencl_benchmark . 6780 |==================================================


clpeak 1.1.2
OpenCL Test: Kernel Latency
us < Lower Is Better
pts_opencl_benchmark . 3.66 |==================================================


clpeak 1.1.2
OpenCL Test: Integer Compute
GIOPS > Higher Is Better
pts_opencl_benchmark . 19644.88 |==============================================


clpeak 1.1.2
OpenCL Test: Integer 24-bit Compute
GIOPS > Higher Is Better
pts_opencl_benchmark . 19674.45 |==============================================


clpeak 1.1.2
OpenCL Test: Global Memory Bandwidth
GBPS > Higher Is Better
pts_opencl_benchmark . 518.27 |================================================


clpeak 1.1.2
OpenCL Test: Double-Precision Compute
GFLOPS > Higher Is Better
pts_opencl_benchmark . 702.62 |================================================


clpeak 1.1.2
OpenCL Test: Single-Precision Compute
GFLOPS > Higher Is Better
pts_opencl_benchmark . 38349.93 |==============================================


clpeak 1.1.2
OpenCL Test: Transfer Bandwidth enqueueReadBuffer
GBPS > Higher Is Better
pts_opencl_benchmark . 12.86 |=================================================


clpeak 1.1.2
OpenCL Test: Transfer Bandwidth enqueueWriteBuffer
GBPS > Higher Is Better
pts_opencl_benchmark . 12.00 |=================================================


Parboil 2.5
Test: OpenCL BFS
Seconds < Lower Is Better


Parboil 2.5
Test: OpenCL LBM
Seconds < Lower Is Better


Parboil 2.5
Test: OpenCL Histo
Seconds < Lower Is Better


Parboil 2.5
Test: OpenCL TPACF
Seconds < Lower Is Better


Parboil 2.5
Test: OpenCL MRI Gridding
Seconds < Lower Is Better


Rodinia 3.1
Test: OpenCL LavaMD
Seconds < Lower Is Better


Rodinia 3.1
Test: OpenCL Myocyte
Seconds < Lower Is Better
pts_opencl_benchmark . 21.45 |=================================================


Rodinia 3.1
Test: OpenCL Heartwall
Seconds < Lower Is Better


Rodinia 3.1
Test: OpenCL Leukocyte
Seconds < Lower Is Better
pts_opencl_benchmark . 2.670 |=================================================


Rodinia 3.1
Test: OpenCL Particle Filter
Seconds < Lower Is Better
pts_opencl_benchmark . 3.296 |=================================================


ViennaCL 1.7.1
Test: CPU BLAS - sCOPY
GB/s > Higher Is Better
pts_opencl_benchmark . 112 |===================================================


ViennaCL 1.7.1
Test: CPU BLAS - sAXPY
GB/s > Higher Is Better
pts_opencl_benchmark . 135 |===================================================


ViennaCL 1.7.1
Test: CPU BLAS - sDOT
GB/s > Higher Is Better
pts_opencl_benchmark . 139 |===================================================


ViennaCL 1.7.1
Test: CPU BLAS - dCOPY
GB/s > Higher Is Better
pts_opencl_benchmark . 59.2 |==================================================


ViennaCL 1.7.1
Test: CPU BLAS - dAXPY
GB/s > Higher Is Better
pts_opencl_benchmark . 73.4 |==================================================


ViennaCL 1.7.1
Test: CPU BLAS - dDOT
GB/s > Higher Is Better
pts_opencl_benchmark . 83.5 |==================================================


ViennaCL 1.7.1
Test: CPU BLAS - dGEMV-N
GB/s > Higher Is Better
pts_opencl_benchmark . 84.4 |==================================================


ViennaCL 1.7.1
Test: CPU BLAS - dGEMV-T
GB/s > Higher Is Better
pts_opencl_benchmark . 92.5 |==================================================


ViennaCL 1.7.1
Test: CPU BLAS - dGEMM-NN
GFLOPs/s > Higher Is Better
pts_opencl_benchmark . 100.7 |=================================================


ViennaCL 1.7.1
Test: CPU BLAS - dGEMM-NT
GFLOPs/s > Higher Is Better
pts_opencl_benchmark . 102.8 |=================================================


ViennaCL 1.7.1
Test: CPU BLAS - dGEMM-TT
GFLOPs/s > Higher Is Better
pts_opencl_benchmark . 108 |===================================================


ViennaCL 1.7.1
Test: CPU BLAS - dGEMM-TN
GFLOPs/s > Higher Is Better
pts_opencl_benchmark . 112 |===================================================


ViennaCL 1.7.1
Test: OpenCL BLAS - sCOPY
GB/s > Higher Is Better
pts_opencl_benchmark . 348 |===================================================


ViennaCL 1.7.1
Test: OpenCL BLAS - sAXPY
GB/s > Higher Is Better
pts_opencl_benchmark . 441 |===================================================


ViennaCL 1.7.1
Test: OpenCL BLAS - sDOT
GB/s > Higher Is Better
pts_opencl_benchmark . 380 |===================================================


ViennaCL 1.7.1
Test: OpenCL BLAS - dCOPY
GB/s > Higher Is Better
pts_opencl_benchmark . 475 |===================================================


ViennaCL 1.7.1
Test: OpenCL BLAS - dAXPY
GB/s > Higher Is Better
pts_opencl_benchmark . 522 |===================================================


ViennaCL 1.7.1
Test: OpenCL BLAS - dDOT
GB/s > Higher Is Better
pts_opencl_benchmark . 523 |===================================================


ViennaCL 1.7.1
Test: OpenCL BLAS - dGEMV-N
GB/s > Higher Is Better
pts_opencl_benchmark . 197 |===================================================


ViennaCL 1.7.1
Test: OpenCL BLAS - dGEMV-T
GB/s > Higher Is Better
pts_opencl_benchmark . 389 |===================================================


ViennaCL 1.7.1
Test: OpenCL BLAS - dGEMM-NN
GFLOPs/s > Higher Is Better
pts_opencl_benchmark . 627 |===================================================


ViennaCL 1.7.1
Test: OpenCL BLAS - dGEMM-NT
GFLOPs/s > Higher Is Better
pts_opencl_benchmark . 644 |===================================================


ViennaCL 1.7.1
Test: OpenCL BLAS - dGEMM-TN
GFLOPs/s > Higher Is Better
pts_opencl_benchmark . 670 |===================================================


ViennaCL 1.7.1
Test: OpenCL BLAS - dGEMM-TT
GFLOPs/s > Higher Is Better
pts_opencl_benchmark . 687 |===================================================


Darktable 3.8.1
Test: Boat - Acceleration: OpenCL
Seconds < Lower Is Better
pts_opencl_benchmark . 1.280 |=================================================


Darktable 3.8.1
Test: Masskrug - Acceleration: OpenCL
Seconds < Lower Is Better
pts_opencl_benchmark . 1.699 |=================================================


Darktable 3.8.1
Test: Server Rack - Acceleration: OpenCL
Seconds < Lower Is Better
pts_opencl_benchmark . 0.119 |=================================================


Darktable 3.8.1
Test: Server Room - Acceleration: OpenCL
Seconds < Lower Is Better
pts_opencl_benchmark . 0.687 |=================================================


Xsbench OpenCL 2017-07-06

Lookups/s > Higher Is Better


JuliaGPU 1.2pts1
OpenCL Device: GPU - Resolution: $VIDEO_WIDTH x $VIDEO_HEIGHT
Samples/sec > Higher Is Better


MandelbulbGPU 1.0pts1
OpenCL Device: GPU - Resolution: $VIDEO_WIDTH x $VIDEO_HEIGHT
Samples/sec > Higher Is Better


MandelGPU 1.3pts1
OpenCL Device: GPU - Resolution: $VIDEO_WIDTH x $VIDEO_HEIGHT
Samples/sec > Higher Is Better


SmallPT GPU 1.6pts1
OpenCL Device: GPU - Resolution: 1920 x 1200 - Scene: Caustic
Samples/sec > Higher Is Better
pts_opencl_benchmark . 1711642497 |============================================


SmallPT GPU 1.6pts1
OpenCL Device: GPU - Resolution: 1920 x 1200 - Scene: Cornell
Samples/sec > Higher Is Better
pts_opencl_benchmark . 1711642633 |============================================


SmallPT GPU 1.6pts1
OpenCL Device: GPU - Resolution: 1920 x 1200 - Scene: Caustic3
Samples/sec > Higher Is Better
pts_opencl_benchmark . 1711642770 |============================================


LuxMark 3.1
OpenCL Device: CPU - Scene: Hotel
Score > Higher Is Better


LuxMark 3.1
OpenCL Device: GPU - Scene: Hotel
Score > Higher Is Better
pts_opencl_benchmark . 17792 |=================================================


LuxMark 3.1
OpenCL Device: CPU+GPU - Scene: Hotel
Score > Higher Is Better
pts_opencl_benchmark . 17792 |=================================================


LuxMark 3.1
OpenCL Device: CPU - Scene: Microphone
Score > Higher Is Better


LuxMark 3.1
OpenCL Device: GPU - Scene: Microphone
Score > Higher Is Better
pts_opencl_benchmark . 55201 |=================================================


LuxMark 3.1
OpenCL Device: CPU - Scene: Luxball HDR
Score > Higher Is Better


LuxMark 3.1
OpenCL Device: GPU - Scene: Luxball HDR
Score > Higher Is Better
pts_opencl_benchmark . 82081 |=================================================


LuxMark 3.1
OpenCL Device: Hybrid GPU - Scene: Hotel
Score > Higher Is Better


LuxMark 3.1
OpenCL Device: CPU+GPU - Scene: Microphone
Score > Higher Is Better
pts_opencl_benchmark . 55213 |=================================================


LuxMark 3.1
OpenCL Device: CPU+GPU - Scene: Luxball HDR
Score > Higher Is Better
pts_opencl_benchmark . 82042 |=================================================


LuxMark 3.1
OpenCL Device: Hybrid GPU - Scene: Microphone
Score > Higher Is Better


LuxMark 3.1
OpenCL Device: Hybrid GPU - Scene: Luxball HDR
Score > Higher Is Better


OpenDwarfs 2013-11-06
Test: LU Decomposition
ms < Lower Is Better


OpenDwarfs 2013-11-06
Test: Compressed Sparse Row
ms < Lower Is Better


OpenDwarfs 2013-11-06
Test: Cyclic Redundancy Check
ms < Lower Is Better


Lulesh OpenCL 2017-07-06

z/s > Higher Is Better
pts_opencl_benchmark . 8852.80 |===============================================