Intel Xeon Gold 5416S testing with a Supermicro X13SEW-TF v1.02 (2.1 BIOS) and ASPEED on Debian 12 via the Phoronix Test Suite.
Compare your own system(s) to this result file with the
Phoronix Test Suite by running the command:
phoronix-test-suite benchmark 2403236-NE-LCUINTELP04
lcu-intel-python2
Intel Xeon Gold 5416S testing with a Supermicro X13SEW-TF v1.02 (2.1 BIOS) and ASPEED on Debian 12 via the Phoronix Test Suite.
Intel Xeon Gold 5416S:
Processor: Intel Xeon Gold 5416S @ 2.00GHz (16 Cores / 32 Threads), Motherboard: Supermicro X13SEW-TF v1.02 (2.1 BIOS), Chipset: Intel Device 1bce, Memory: 64GB, Disk: 3841GB SAMSUNG MZ1L23T8HBLA-00A07, Graphics: ASPEED, Monitor: DELL 1907FPV, Network: 2 x Intel X550 + 2 x Intel I350
OS: Debian 12, Kernel: 6.1.0-18-amd64 (x86_64), Compiler: GCC 12.2.0, File-System: xfs, Screen Resolution: 1280x1024
Numenta Anomaly Benchmark 1.1
Detector: KNN CAD
Seconds < Lower Is Better
Intel Xeon Gold 5416S . 147.09 |===============================================
Numpy Benchmark
Score > Higher Is Better
Intel Xeon Gold 5416S . 569.13 |===============================================
Numenta Anomaly Benchmark 1.1
Detector: Earthgecko Skyline
Seconds < Lower Is Better
Intel Xeon Gold 5416S . 68.10 |================================================
PyPerformance 1.0.0
Benchmark: python_startup
Milliseconds < Lower Is Better
Intel Xeon Gold 5416S . 6.95 |=================================================
PyPerformance 1.0.0
Benchmark: django_template
Milliseconds < Lower Is Better
Intel Xeon Gold 5416S . 23.4 |=================================================
PyPerformance 1.0.0
Benchmark: 2to3
Milliseconds < Lower Is Better
Intel Xeon Gold 5416S . 194 |==================================================
PyPerformance 1.0.0
Benchmark: regex_compile
Milliseconds < Lower Is Better
Intel Xeon Gold 5416S . 96.2 |=================================================
PyPerformance 1.0.0
Benchmark: crypto_pyaes
Milliseconds < Lower Is Better
Intel Xeon Gold 5416S . 50.0 |=================================================
PyPerformance 1.0.0
Benchmark: go
Milliseconds < Lower Is Better
Intel Xeon Gold 5416S . 98.5 |=================================================
PyPerformance 1.0.0
Benchmark: chaos
Milliseconds < Lower Is Better
Intel Xeon Gold 5416S . 45.4 |=================================================
PyPerformance 1.0.0
Benchmark: raytrace
Milliseconds < Lower Is Better
Intel Xeon Gold 5416S . 185 |==================================================
PyPerformance 1.0.0
Benchmark: float
Milliseconds < Lower Is Better
Intel Xeon Gold 5416S . 45.2 |=================================================
PyPerformance 1.0.0
Benchmark: pathlib
Milliseconds < Lower Is Better
Intel Xeon Gold 5416S . 10.5 |=================================================
Numenta Anomaly Benchmark 1.1
Detector: Contextual Anomaly Detector OSE
Seconds < Lower Is Better
Intel Xeon Gold 5416S . 30.29 |================================================
PyPerformance 1.0.0
Benchmark: json_loads
Milliseconds < Lower Is Better
Intel Xeon Gold 5416S . 13.9 |=================================================
Cython Benchmark 0.29.21
Test: N-Queens
Seconds < Lower Is Better
Intel Xeon Gold 5416S . 18.80 |================================================
Numenta Anomaly Benchmark 1.1
Detector: Bayesian Changepoint
Seconds < Lower Is Better
Intel Xeon Gold 5416S . 23.06 |================================================
PyPerformance 1.0.0
Benchmark: pickle_pure_python
Milliseconds < Lower Is Better
Intel Xeon Gold 5416S . 185 |==================================================
PyPerformance 1.0.0
Benchmark: nbody
Milliseconds < Lower Is Better
Intel Xeon Gold 5416S . 55.3 |=================================================
PyBench 2018-02-16
Total For Average Test Times
Milliseconds < Lower Is Better
Intel Xeon Gold 5416S . 561 |==================================================
Numenta Anomaly Benchmark 1.1
Detector: Relative Entropy
Seconds < Lower Is Better
Intel Xeon Gold 5416S . 11.06 |================================================
Numenta Anomaly Benchmark 1.1
Detector: Windowed Gaussian
Seconds < Lower Is Better
Intel Xeon Gold 5416S . 6.026 |================================================
Scikit-Learn 1.2.2
Benchmark: Plot Non-Negative Matrix Factorization
Seconds < Lower Is Better
Scikit-Learn 1.2.2
Benchmark: RCV1 Logreg Convergencet
Seconds < Lower Is Better
Scikit-Learn 1.2.2
Benchmark: Hist Gradient Boosting Higgs Boson
Seconds < Lower Is Better
Scikit-Learn 1.2.2
Benchmark: Isolation Forest
Seconds < Lower Is Better
Scikit-Learn 1.2.2
Benchmark: Kernel PCA Solvers / Time vs. N Components
Seconds < Lower Is Better
Scikit-Learn 1.2.2
Benchmark: Kernel PCA Solvers / Time vs. N Samples
Seconds < Lower Is Better
Scikit-Learn 1.2.2
Benchmark: Sample Without Replacement
Seconds < Lower Is Better
Scikit-Learn 1.2.2
Benchmark: SGD Regression
Seconds < Lower Is Better
Scikit-Learn 1.2.2
Benchmark: Tree
Seconds < Lower Is Better
Scikit-Learn 1.2.2
Benchmark: Plot Parallel Pairwise
Seconds < Lower Is Better
Scikit-Learn 1.2.2
Benchmark: Hist Gradient Boosting
Seconds < Lower Is Better
Scikit-Learn 1.2.2
Benchmark: LocalOutlierFactor
Seconds < Lower Is Better
Scikit-Learn 1.2.2
Benchmark: Plot Neighbors
Seconds < Lower Is Better
Scikit-Learn 1.2.2
Benchmark: Plot Incremental PCA
Seconds < Lower Is Better
Scikit-Learn 1.2.2
Benchmark: Feature Expansions
Seconds < Lower Is Better
Scikit-Learn 1.2.2
Benchmark: Text Vectorizers
Seconds < Lower Is Better
Scikit-Learn 1.2.2
Benchmark: Hist Gradient Boosting Adult
Seconds < Lower Is Better
Scikit-Learn 1.2.2
Benchmark: Covertype Dataset Benchmark
Seconds < Lower Is Better
Scikit-Learn 1.2.2
Benchmark: MNIST Dataset
Seconds < Lower Is Better
Scikit-Learn 1.2.2
Benchmark: TSNE MNIST Dataset
Seconds < Lower Is Better
Mlpack Benchmark
Benchmark: scikit_qda
Seconds < Lower Is Better
Mlpack Benchmark
Benchmark: scikit_svm
Seconds < Lower Is Better
Mlpack Benchmark
Benchmark: scikit_ica
Seconds < Lower Is Better
Mlpack Benchmark
Benchmark: scikit_linearridgeregression
Seconds < Lower Is Better
Scikit-Learn 1.2.2
Benchmark: Hist Gradient Boosting Threading
Seconds < Lower Is Better
Scikit-Learn 1.2.2
Benchmark: Glmnet
Seconds < Lower Is Better
Scikit-Learn 1.2.2
Benchmark: Sparse Random Projections / 100 Iterations
Seconds < Lower Is Better
Scikit-Learn 1.2.2
Benchmark: Hist Gradient Boosting Categorical Only
Seconds < Lower Is Better
Scikit-Learn 1.2.2
Benchmark: Plot Polynomial Kernel Approximation
Seconds < Lower Is Better
Scikit-Learn 1.2.2
Benchmark: 20 Newsgroups / Logistic Regression
Seconds < Lower Is Better
Scikit-Learn 1.2.2
Benchmark: Isotonic / Perturbed Logarithm
Seconds < Lower Is Better
Scikit-Learn 1.2.2
Benchmark: Isotonic / Pathological
Seconds < Lower Is Better
Scikit-Learn 1.2.2
Benchmark: Isotonic / Logistic
Seconds < Lower Is Better
Scikit-Learn 1.2.2
Benchmark: Plot OMP vs. LARS
Seconds < Lower Is Better
Scikit-Learn 1.2.2
Benchmark: Plot Hierarchical
Seconds < Lower Is Better
Scikit-Learn 1.2.2
Benchmark: Plot Fast KMeans
Seconds < Lower Is Better
Scikit-Learn 1.2.2
Benchmark: Plot Lasso Path
Seconds < Lower Is Better
Scikit-Learn 1.2.2
Benchmark: Lasso
Seconds < Lower Is Better
Scikit-Learn 1.2.2
Benchmark: SAGA
Seconds < Lower Is Better
Scikit-Learn 1.2.2
Benchmark: GLM
Seconds < Lower Is Better
Scikit-Learn 1.2.2
Benchmark: Plot Ward
Seconds < Lower Is Better
Scikit-Learn 1.2.2
Benchmark: Sparsify
Seconds < Lower Is Better
Scikit-Learn 1.2.2
Benchmark: Plot Singular Value Decomposition
Seconds < Lower Is Better
Scikit-Learn 1.2.2
Benchmark: SGDOneClassSVM
Seconds < Lower Is Better
PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0
Device: CPU - Backend: PyTorch - Project Size: 16384 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing
Seconds < Lower Is Better
PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0
Device: CPU - Backend: Numpy - Project Size: 1048576 - Benchmark: Equation of State
Seconds < Lower Is Better
PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0
Device: CPU - Backend: Aesara - Project Size: 65536 - Benchmark: Equation of State
Seconds < Lower Is Better
PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0
Device: CPU - Backend: Aesara - Project Size: 16384 - Benchmark: Equation of State
Seconds < Lower Is Better
PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0
Device: CPU - Backend: Numpy - Project Size: 65536 - Benchmark: Equation of State
Seconds < Lower Is Better
PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0
Device: CPU - Backend: TensorFlow - Project Size: 4194304 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing
Seconds < Lower Is Better
PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0
Device: CPU - Backend: TensorFlow - Project Size: 4194304 - Benchmark: Equation of State
Seconds < Lower Is Better
PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0
Device: CPU - Backend: TensorFlow - Project Size: 1048576 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing
Seconds < Lower Is Better
PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0
Device: CPU - Backend: TensorFlow - Project Size: 1048576 - Benchmark: Equation of State
Seconds < Lower Is Better
PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0
Device: CPU - Backend: TensorFlow - Project Size: 262144 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing
Seconds < Lower Is Better
PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0
Device: CPU - Backend: TensorFlow - Project Size: 262144 - Benchmark: Equation of State
Seconds < Lower Is Better
PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0
Device: CPU - Backend: TensorFlow - Project Size: 65536 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing
Seconds < Lower Is Better
PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0
Device: CPU - Backend: TensorFlow - Project Size: 65536 - Benchmark: Equation of State
Seconds < Lower Is Better
PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0
Device: CPU - Backend: TensorFlow - Project Size: 16384 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing
Seconds < Lower Is Better
PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0
Device: CPU - Backend: TensorFlow - Project Size: 16384 - Benchmark: Equation of State
Seconds < Lower Is Better
PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0
Device: CPU - Backend: PyTorch - Project Size: 4194304 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing
Seconds < Lower Is Better
PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0
Device: CPU - Backend: PyTorch - Project Size: 4194304 - Benchmark: Equation of State
Seconds < Lower Is Better
PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0
Device: CPU - Backend: PyTorch - Project Size: 1048576 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing
Seconds < Lower Is Better
PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0
Device: CPU - Backend: PyTorch - Project Size: 1048576 - Benchmark: Equation of State
Seconds < Lower Is Better
PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0
Device: CPU - Backend: PyTorch - Project Size: 262144 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing
Seconds < Lower Is Better
PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0
Device: CPU - Backend: PyTorch - Project Size: 262144 - Benchmark: Equation of State
Seconds < Lower Is Better
PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0
Device: CPU - Backend: Aesara - Project Size: 4194304 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing
Seconds < Lower Is Better
PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0
Device: CPU - Backend: Aesara - Project Size: 4194304 - Benchmark: Equation of State
Seconds < Lower Is Better
PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0
Device: CPU - Backend: Aesara - Project Size: 1048576 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing
Seconds < Lower Is Better
PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0
Device: CPU - Backend: Aesara - Project Size: 1048576 - Benchmark: Equation of State
Seconds < Lower Is Better
PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0
Device: CPU - Backend: PyTorch - Project Size: 65536 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing
Seconds < Lower Is Better
PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0
Device: CPU - Backend: PyTorch - Project Size: 65536 - Benchmark: Equation of State
Seconds < Lower Is Better
PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0
Device: CPU - Backend: PyTorch - Project Size: 16384 - Benchmark: Equation of State
Seconds < Lower Is Better
PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0
Device: CPU - Backend: Numpy - Project Size: 4194304 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing
Seconds < Lower Is Better
PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0
Device: CPU - Backend: Numpy - Project Size: 4194304 - Benchmark: Equation of State
Seconds < Lower Is Better
PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0
Device: CPU - Backend: Numpy - Project Size: 1048576 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing
Seconds < Lower Is Better
PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0
Device: CPU - Backend: Numba - Project Size: 4194304 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing
Seconds < Lower Is Better
PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0
Device: CPU - Backend: Numba - Project Size: 4194304 - Benchmark: Equation of State
Seconds < Lower Is Better
PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0
Device: CPU - Backend: Numba - Project Size: 1048576 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing
Seconds < Lower Is Better
PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0
Device: CPU - Backend: Numba - Project Size: 1048576 - Benchmark: Equation of State
Seconds < Lower Is Better
PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0
Device: CPU - Backend: Aesara - Project Size: 262144 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing
Seconds < Lower Is Better
PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0
Device: CPU - Backend: Aesara - Project Size: 262144 - Benchmark: Equation of State
Seconds < Lower Is Better
PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0
Device: CPU - Backend: Numpy - Project Size: 262144 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing
Seconds < Lower Is Better
PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0
Device: CPU - Backend: Numpy - Project Size: 262144 - Benchmark: Equation of State
Seconds < Lower Is Better
PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0
Device: CPU - Backend: Numba - Project Size: 262144 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing
Seconds < Lower Is Better
PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0
Device: CPU - Backend: Numba - Project Size: 262144 - Benchmark: Equation of State
Seconds < Lower Is Better
PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0
Device: CPU - Backend: Aesara - Project Size: 65536 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing
Seconds < Lower Is Better
PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0
Device: CPU - Backend: Aesara - Project Size: 16384 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing
Seconds < Lower Is Better
PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0
Device: CPU - Backend: Numpy - Project Size: 65536 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing
Seconds < Lower Is Better
PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0
Device: CPU - Backend: Numpy - Project Size: 16384 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing
Seconds < Lower Is Better
PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0
Device: CPU - Backend: Numpy - Project Size: 16384 - Benchmark: Equation of State
Seconds < Lower Is Better
PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0
Device: CPU - Backend: Numba - Project Size: 65536 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing
Seconds < Lower Is Better
PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0
Device: CPU - Backend: Numba - Project Size: 65536 - Benchmark: Equation of State
Seconds < Lower Is Better
PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0
Device: CPU - Backend: Numba - Project Size: 16384 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing
Seconds < Lower Is Better
PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0
Device: CPU - Backend: Numba - Project Size: 16384 - Benchmark: Equation of State
Seconds < Lower Is Better
PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0
Device: CPU - Backend: JAX - Project Size: 4194304 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing
Seconds < Lower Is Better
PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0
Device: CPU - Backend: JAX - Project Size: 4194304 - Benchmark: Equation of State
Seconds < Lower Is Better
PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0
Device: CPU - Backend: JAX - Project Size: 1048576 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing
Seconds < Lower Is Better
PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0
Device: CPU - Backend: JAX - Project Size: 1048576 - Benchmark: Equation of State
Seconds < Lower Is Better
PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0
Device: CPU - Backend: JAX - Project Size: 262144 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing
Seconds < Lower Is Better
PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0
Device: CPU - Backend: JAX - Project Size: 262144 - Benchmark: Equation of State
Seconds < Lower Is Better
PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0
Device: CPU - Backend: JAX - Project Size: 65536 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing
Seconds < Lower Is Better
PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0
Device: CPU - Backend: JAX - Project Size: 65536 - Benchmark: Equation of State
Seconds < Lower Is Better
PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0
Device: CPU - Backend: JAX - Project Size: 16384 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing
Seconds < Lower Is Better
PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0
Device: CPU - Backend: JAX - Project Size: 16384 - Benchmark: Equation of State
Seconds < Lower Is Better