lcu-intel-python2

Intel Xeon Gold 5416S testing with a Supermicro X13SEW-TF v1.02 (2.1 BIOS) and ASPEED on Debian 12 via the Phoronix Test Suite.

Compare your own system(s) to this result file with the Phoronix Test Suite by running the command: phoronix-test-suite benchmark 2403236-NE-LCUINTELP04
Jump To Table - Results

Statistics

Remove Outliers Before Calculating Averages

Graph Settings

Prefer Vertical Bar Graphs

Multi-Way Comparison

Condense Multi-Option Tests Into Single Result Graphs

Table

Show Detailed System Result Table

Run Management

Result
Identifier
Performance Per
Dollar
Date
Run
  Test
  Duration
Intel Xeon Gold 5416S
March 22
  45 Minutes
Only show results matching title/arguments (delimit multiple options with a comma):
Do not show results matching title/arguments (delimit multiple options with a comma):

lcu-intel-python2 Intel Xeon Gold 5416S testing with a Supermicro X13SEW-TF v1.02 (2.1 BIOS) and ASPEED on Debian 12 via the Phoronix Test Suite. Intel Xeon Gold 5416S: Processor: Intel Xeon Gold 5416S @ 2.00GHz (16 Cores / 32 Threads), Motherboard: Supermicro X13SEW-TF v1.02 (2.1 BIOS), Chipset: Intel Device 1bce, Memory: 64GB, Disk: 3841GB SAMSUNG MZ1L23T8HBLA-00A07, Graphics: ASPEED, Monitor: DELL 1907FPV, Network: 2 x Intel X550 + 2 x Intel I350 OS: Debian 12, Kernel: 6.1.0-18-amd64 (x86_64), Compiler: GCC 12.2.0, File-System: xfs, Screen Resolution: 1280x1024 Numpy Benchmark Score > Higher Is Better Intel Xeon Gold 5416S . 569.13 |=============================================== Cython Benchmark 0.29.21 Test: N-Queens Seconds < Lower Is Better Intel Xeon Gold 5416S . 18.80 |================================================ PyBench 2018-02-16 Total For Average Test Times Milliseconds < Lower Is Better Intel Xeon Gold 5416S . 561 |================================================== PyPerformance 1.0.0 Benchmark: go Milliseconds < Lower Is Better Intel Xeon Gold 5416S . 98.5 |================================================= PyPerformance 1.0.0 Benchmark: 2to3 Milliseconds < Lower Is Better Intel Xeon Gold 5416S . 194 |================================================== PyPerformance 1.0.0 Benchmark: chaos Milliseconds < Lower Is Better Intel Xeon Gold 5416S . 45.4 |================================================= PyPerformance 1.0.0 Benchmark: float Milliseconds < Lower Is Better Intel Xeon Gold 5416S . 45.2 |================================================= PyPerformance 1.0.0 Benchmark: nbody Milliseconds < Lower Is Better Intel Xeon Gold 5416S . 55.3 |================================================= PyPerformance 1.0.0 Benchmark: pathlib Milliseconds < Lower Is Better Intel Xeon Gold 5416S . 10.5 |================================================= PyPerformance 1.0.0 Benchmark: raytrace Milliseconds < Lower Is Better Intel Xeon Gold 5416S . 185 |================================================== PyPerformance 1.0.0 Benchmark: json_loads Milliseconds < Lower Is Better Intel Xeon Gold 5416S . 13.9 |================================================= PyPerformance 1.0.0 Benchmark: crypto_pyaes Milliseconds < Lower Is Better Intel Xeon Gold 5416S . 50.0 |================================================= PyPerformance 1.0.0 Benchmark: regex_compile Milliseconds < Lower Is Better Intel Xeon Gold 5416S . 96.2 |================================================= PyPerformance 1.0.0 Benchmark: python_startup Milliseconds < Lower Is Better Intel Xeon Gold 5416S . 6.95 |================================================= PyPerformance 1.0.0 Benchmark: django_template Milliseconds < Lower Is Better Intel Xeon Gold 5416S . 23.4 |================================================= PyPerformance 1.0.0 Benchmark: pickle_pure_python Milliseconds < Lower Is Better Intel Xeon Gold 5416S . 185 |================================================== Numenta Anomaly Benchmark 1.1 Detector: KNN CAD Seconds < Lower Is Better Intel Xeon Gold 5416S . 147.09 |=============================================== Numenta Anomaly Benchmark 1.1 Detector: Relative Entropy Seconds < Lower Is Better Intel Xeon Gold 5416S . 11.06 |================================================ Numenta Anomaly Benchmark 1.1 Detector: Windowed Gaussian Seconds < Lower Is Better Intel Xeon Gold 5416S . 6.026 |================================================ Numenta Anomaly Benchmark 1.1 Detector: Earthgecko Skyline Seconds < Lower Is Better Intel Xeon Gold 5416S . 68.10 |================================================ Numenta Anomaly Benchmark 1.1 Detector: Bayesian Changepoint Seconds < Lower Is Better Intel Xeon Gold 5416S . 23.06 |================================================ Numenta Anomaly Benchmark 1.1 Detector: Contextual Anomaly Detector OSE Seconds < Lower Is Better Intel Xeon Gold 5416S . 30.29 |================================================ Mlpack Benchmark Benchmark: scikit_ica Seconds < Lower Is Better Mlpack Benchmark Benchmark: scikit_qda Seconds < Lower Is Better Mlpack Benchmark Benchmark: scikit_svm Seconds < Lower Is Better Mlpack Benchmark Benchmark: scikit_linearridgeregression Seconds < Lower Is Better PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: JAX - Project Size: 16384 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: JAX - Project Size: 16384 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: JAX - Project Size: 65536 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: JAX - Project Size: 65536 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: JAX - Project Size: 262144 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: JAX - Project Size: 262144 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: JAX - Project Size: 1048576 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: JAX - Project Size: 1048576 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: JAX - Project Size: 4194304 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: JAX - Project Size: 4194304 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: Numba - Project Size: 16384 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: Numba - Project Size: 16384 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: Numba - Project Size: 65536 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: Numba - Project Size: 65536 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: Numpy - Project Size: 16384 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: Numpy - Project Size: 16384 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: Numpy - Project Size: 65536 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: Numpy - Project Size: 65536 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: Aesara - Project Size: 16384 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: Aesara - Project Size: 16384 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: Aesara - Project Size: 65536 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: Aesara - Project Size: 65536 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: Numba - Project Size: 262144 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: Numba - Project Size: 262144 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: Numpy - Project Size: 262144 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: Numpy - Project Size: 262144 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: Aesara - Project Size: 262144 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: Aesara - Project Size: 262144 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: Numba - Project Size: 1048576 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: Numba - Project Size: 1048576 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: Numba - Project Size: 4194304 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: Numba - Project Size: 4194304 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: Numpy - Project Size: 1048576 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: Numpy - Project Size: 1048576 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: Numpy - Project Size: 4194304 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: Numpy - Project Size: 4194304 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: PyTorch - Project Size: 16384 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: PyTorch - Project Size: 16384 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: PyTorch - Project Size: 65536 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: PyTorch - Project Size: 65536 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: Aesara - Project Size: 1048576 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: Aesara - Project Size: 1048576 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: Aesara - Project Size: 4194304 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: Aesara - Project Size: 4194304 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: PyTorch - Project Size: 262144 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: PyTorch - Project Size: 262144 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: PyTorch - Project Size: 1048576 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: PyTorch - Project Size: 1048576 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: PyTorch - Project Size: 4194304 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: PyTorch - Project Size: 4194304 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: TensorFlow - Project Size: 16384 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: TensorFlow - Project Size: 16384 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: TensorFlow - Project Size: 65536 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: TensorFlow - Project Size: 65536 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: TensorFlow - Project Size: 262144 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: TensorFlow - Project Size: 262144 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: TensorFlow - Project Size: 1048576 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: TensorFlow - Project Size: 1048576 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: TensorFlow - Project Size: 4194304 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: TensorFlow - Project Size: 4194304 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better Scikit-Learn 1.2.2 Benchmark: GLM Seconds < Lower Is Better Scikit-Learn 1.2.2 Benchmark: SAGA Seconds < Lower Is Better Scikit-Learn 1.2.2 Benchmark: Tree Seconds < Lower Is Better Scikit-Learn 1.2.2 Benchmark: Lasso Seconds < Lower Is Better Scikit-Learn 1.2.2 Benchmark: Glmnet Seconds < Lower Is Better Scikit-Learn 1.2.2 Benchmark: Sparsify Seconds < Lower Is Better Scikit-Learn 1.2.2 Benchmark: Plot Ward Seconds < Lower Is Better Scikit-Learn 1.2.2 Benchmark: MNIST Dataset Seconds < Lower Is Better Scikit-Learn 1.2.2 Benchmark: Plot Neighbors Seconds < Lower Is Better Scikit-Learn 1.2.2 Benchmark: SGD Regression Seconds < Lower Is Better Scikit-Learn 1.2.2 Benchmark: SGDOneClassSVM Seconds < Lower Is Better Scikit-Learn 1.2.2 Benchmark: Plot Lasso Path Seconds < Lower Is Better Scikit-Learn 1.2.2 Benchmark: Isolation Forest Seconds < Lower Is Better Scikit-Learn 1.2.2 Benchmark: Plot Fast KMeans Seconds < Lower Is Better Scikit-Learn 1.2.2 Benchmark: Text Vectorizers Seconds < Lower Is Better Scikit-Learn 1.2.2 Benchmark: Plot Hierarchical Seconds < Lower Is Better Scikit-Learn 1.2.2 Benchmark: Plot OMP vs. LARS Seconds < Lower Is Better Scikit-Learn 1.2.2 Benchmark: Feature Expansions Seconds < Lower Is Better Scikit-Learn 1.2.2 Benchmark: LocalOutlierFactor Seconds < Lower Is Better Scikit-Learn 1.2.2 Benchmark: TSNE MNIST Dataset Seconds < Lower Is Better Scikit-Learn 1.2.2 Benchmark: Isotonic / Logistic Seconds < Lower Is Better Scikit-Learn 1.2.2 Benchmark: Plot Incremental PCA Seconds < Lower Is Better Scikit-Learn 1.2.2 Benchmark: Hist Gradient Boosting Seconds < Lower Is Better Scikit-Learn 1.2.2 Benchmark: Plot Parallel Pairwise Seconds < Lower Is Better Scikit-Learn 1.2.2 Benchmark: Isotonic / Pathological Seconds < Lower Is Better Scikit-Learn 1.2.2 Benchmark: RCV1 Logreg Convergencet Seconds < Lower Is Better Scikit-Learn 1.2.2 Benchmark: Sample Without Replacement Seconds < Lower Is Better Scikit-Learn 1.2.2 Benchmark: Covertype Dataset Benchmark Seconds < Lower Is Better Scikit-Learn 1.2.2 Benchmark: Hist Gradient Boosting Adult Seconds < Lower Is Better Scikit-Learn 1.2.2 Benchmark: Isotonic / Perturbed Logarithm Seconds < Lower Is Better Scikit-Learn 1.2.2 Benchmark: Hist Gradient Boosting Threading Seconds < Lower Is Better Scikit-Learn 1.2.2 Benchmark: Plot Singular Value Decomposition Seconds < Lower Is Better Scikit-Learn 1.2.2 Benchmark: Hist Gradient Boosting Higgs Boson Seconds < Lower Is Better Scikit-Learn 1.2.2 Benchmark: 20 Newsgroups / Logistic Regression Seconds < Lower Is Better Scikit-Learn 1.2.2 Benchmark: Plot Polynomial Kernel Approximation Seconds < Lower Is Better Scikit-Learn 1.2.2 Benchmark: Plot Non-Negative Matrix Factorization Seconds < Lower Is Better Scikit-Learn 1.2.2 Benchmark: Hist Gradient Boosting Categorical Only Seconds < Lower Is Better Scikit-Learn 1.2.2 Benchmark: Kernel PCA Solvers / Time vs. N Samples Seconds < Lower Is Better Scikit-Learn 1.2.2 Benchmark: Kernel PCA Solvers / Time vs. N Components Seconds < Lower Is Better Scikit-Learn 1.2.2 Benchmark: Sparse Random Projections / 100 Iterations Seconds < Lower Is Better