ripper-nvidia-gpu-compute-1050ti

AMD Ryzen Threadripper 7960X 24-Cores testing with a ASRock TRX50 WS (7.09 BIOS) and Gigabyte NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti 4GB on Ubuntu 22.04 via the Phoronix Test Suite.

Compare your own system(s) to this result file with the Phoronix Test Suite by running the command: phoronix-test-suite benchmark 2403201-NE-RIPPERNVI89
Jump To Table - Results

Statistics

Remove Outliers Before Calculating Averages

Graph Settings

Prefer Vertical Bar Graphs

Multi-Way Comparison

Condense Multi-Option Tests Into Single Result Graphs

Table

Show Detailed System Result Table

Run Management

Result
Identifier
View Logs
Performance Per
Dollar
Date
Run
  Test
  Duration
1050ti
March 20
  7 Hours, 25 Minutes
Only show results matching title/arguments (delimit multiple options with a comma):
Do not show results matching title/arguments (delimit multiple options with a comma):

ripper-nvidia-gpu-compute-1050ti AMD Ryzen Threadripper 7960X 24-Cores testing with a ASRock TRX50 WS (7.09 BIOS) and Gigabyte NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti 4GB on Ubuntu 22.04 via the Phoronix Test Suite. 1050ti: Processor: AMD Ryzen Threadripper 7960X 24-Cores @ 8.23GHz (24 Cores / 48 Threads), Motherboard: ASRock TRX50 WS (7.09 BIOS), Chipset: AMD Device 14a4, Memory: 128GB, Disk: 2000GB Samsung SSD 980 PRO with Heatsink 2TB, Graphics: Gigabyte NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti 4GB, Audio: Realtek ALC1220, Monitor: SyncMaster, Network: Aquantia Device 04c0 + Realtek RTL8125 2.5GbE + MEDIATEK Device 0616 OS: Ubuntu 22.04, Kernel: 6.5.0-25-generic (x86_64), Desktop: GNOME Shell 42.9, Display Server: X Server 1.21.1.4, Display Driver: NVIDIA 535.161.07, OpenGL: 4.6.0, OpenCL: OpenCL 3.0 CUDA 12.2.148, Vulkan: 1.3.242, Compiler: GCC 11.4.0, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 1680x1050 vkpeak 20230730 fp32-scalar GFLOPS > Higher Is Better 1050ti . 2547.61 |============================================================= vkpeak 20230730 fp32-vec4 GFLOPS > Higher Is Better 1050ti . 2542.83 |============================================================= vkpeak 20230730 fp64-scalar GFLOPS > Higher Is Better 1050ti . 81.80 |=============================================================== vkpeak 20230730 fp64-vec4 GFLOPS > Higher Is Better 1050ti . 81.77 |=============================================================== vkpeak 20230730 int32-scalar GIOPS > Higher Is Better 1050ti . 852.37 |============================================================== vkpeak 20230730 int32-vec4 GIOPS > Higher Is Better 1050ti . 803.05 |============================================================== RealSR-NCNN 20200818 Scale: 4x - TAA: No Seconds < Lower Is Better 1050ti . 32.35 |=============================================================== RealSR-NCNN 20200818 Scale: 4x - TAA: Yes Seconds < Lower Is Better 1050ti . 240.63 |============================================================== Waifu2x-NCNN Vulkan 20200818 Scale: 2x - Denoise: 3 - TAA: No Seconds < Lower Is Better 1050ti . 2.638 |=============================================================== Waifu2x-NCNN Vulkan 20200818 Scale: 2x - Denoise: 3 - TAA: Yes Seconds < Lower Is Better 1050ti . 14.69 |=============================================================== VkFFT 1.3.4 Test: FFT + iFFT R2C / C2R Benchmark Score > Higher Is Better 1050ti . 8448 |================================================================ VkFFT 1.3.4 Test: FFT + iFFT C2C 1D batched in half precision Benchmark Score > Higher Is Better 1050ti . 23662 |=============================================================== VkFFT 1.3.4 Test: FFT + iFFT C2C Bluestein in single precision Benchmark Score > Higher Is Better 1050ti . 2815 |================================================================ VkFFT 1.3.4 Test: FFT + iFFT C2C 1D batched in double precision Benchmark Score > Higher Is Better 1050ti . 3882 |================================================================ VkFFT 1.3.4 Test: FFT + iFFT C2C 1D batched in single precision Benchmark Score > Higher Is Better 1050ti . 15013 |=============================================================== VkFFT 1.3.4 Test: FFT + iFFT C2C multidimensional in single precision Benchmark Score > Higher Is Better 1050ti . 9081 |================================================================ VkFFT 1.3.4 Test: FFT + iFFT C2C Bluestein benchmark in double precision Benchmark Score > Higher Is Better 1050ti . 890 |================================================================= VkFFT 1.3.4 Test: FFT + iFFT C2C 1D batched in single precision, no reshuffling Benchmark Score > Higher Is Better 1050ti . 15935 |=============================================================== Hashcat 6.2.4 Benchmark: MD5 H/s > Higher Is Better 1050ti . 6853600000 |========================================================== Hashcat 6.2.4 Benchmark: SHA1 H/s > Higher Is Better 1050ti . 2411633333 |========================================================== Hashcat 6.2.4 Benchmark: 7-Zip H/s > Higher Is Better 1050ti . 102700 |============================================================== Hashcat 6.2.4 Benchmark: SHA-512 H/s > Higher Is Better 1050ti . 249046667 |=========================================================== Hashcat 6.2.4 Benchmark: TrueCrypt RIPEMD160 + XTS H/s > Higher Is Better Mixbench 2020-06-23 Backend: OpenCL - Benchmark: Integer Mixbench 2020-06-23 Backend: NVIDIA CUDA - Benchmark: Integer Mixbench 2020-06-23 Backend: OpenCL - Benchmark: Double Precision Mixbench 2020-06-23 Backend: OpenCL - Benchmark: Single Precision Mixbench 2020-06-23 Backend: NVIDIA CUDA - Benchmark: Half Precision Mixbench 2020-06-23 Backend: NVIDIA CUDA - Benchmark: Double Precision Mixbench 2020-06-23 Backend: NVIDIA CUDA - Benchmark: Single Precision SHOC Scalable HeterOgeneous Computing 2020-04-17 Target: OpenCL - Benchmark: S3D GFLOPS > Higher Is Better 1050ti . 53.25 |=============================================================== SHOC Scalable HeterOgeneous Computing 2020-04-17 Target: OpenCL - Benchmark: Triad GB/s > Higher Is Better 1050ti . 11.70 |=============================================================== SHOC Scalable HeterOgeneous Computing 2020-04-17 Target: OpenCL - Benchmark: FFT SP GFLOPS > Higher Is Better 1050ti . 255.11 |============================================================== SHOC Scalable HeterOgeneous Computing 2020-04-17 Target: OpenCL - Benchmark: MD5 Hash GHash/s > Higher Is Better 1050ti . 3.9258 |============================================================== SHOC Scalable HeterOgeneous Computing 2020-04-17 Target: OpenCL - Benchmark: Reduction GB/s > Higher Is Better 1050ti . 94.07 |=============================================================== SHOC Scalable HeterOgeneous Computing 2020-04-17 Target: OpenCL - Benchmark: GEMM SGEMM_N GFLOPS > Higher Is Better 1050ti . 778.84 |============================================================== SHOC Scalable HeterOgeneous Computing 2020-04-17 Target: OpenCL - Benchmark: Max SP Flops GFLOPS > Higher Is Better 1050ti . 2583.55 |============================================================= SHOC Scalable HeterOgeneous Computing 2020-04-17 Target: OpenCL - Benchmark: Bus Speed Download GB/s > Higher Is Better 1050ti . 13.22 |=============================================================== SHOC Scalable HeterOgeneous Computing 2020-04-17 Target: OpenCL - Benchmark: Bus Speed Readback GB/s > Higher Is Better 1050ti . 13.56 |=============================================================== SHOC Scalable HeterOgeneous Computing 2020-04-17 Target: OpenCL - Benchmark: Texture Read Bandwidth GB/s > Higher Is Better 1050ti . 317.23 |============================================================== Libplacebo 6.338.2 FPS > Higher Is Better cl-mem 2017-01-13 Benchmark: Copy GB/s > Higher Is Better 1050ti . 88.6 |================================================================ cl-mem 2017-01-13 Benchmark: Read GB/s > Higher Is Better 1050ti . 95.7 |================================================================ cl-mem 2017-01-13 Benchmark: Write GB/s > Higher Is Better 1050ti . 92.8 |================================================================ NAMD CUDA 2.14 ATPase Simulation - 327,506 Atoms days/ns < Lower Is Better 1050ti . 0.47923 |============================================================= Betsy GPU Compressor 1.1 Beta Codec: ETC1 - Quality: Highest Seconds < Lower Is Better Betsy GPU Compressor 1.1 Beta Codec: ETC2 RGB - Quality: Highest Seconds < Lower Is Better VkResample 1.0 Upscale: 2x - Precision: Double ms < Lower Is Better 1050ti . 500.00 |============================================================== VkResample 1.0 Upscale: 2x - Precision: Single ms < Lower Is Better 1050ti . 99.64 |=============================================================== OctaneBench 2020.1 Total Score Score > Higher Is Better 1050ti . 47.91 |=============================================================== RedShift Demo 3.0 Seconds < Lower Is Better FAHBench 2.3.2 Ns Per Day > Higher Is Better 1050ti . 61.04 |=============================================================== clpeak 1.1.2 OpenCL Test: Integer Compute INT GIOPS > Higher Is Better 1050ti . 834.15 |============================================================== clpeak 1.1.2 OpenCL Test: Single-Precision Float GFLOPS > Higher Is Better 1050ti . 2414.32 |============================================================= clpeak 1.1.2 OpenCL Test: Double-Precision Double GFLOPS > Higher Is Better 1050ti . 80.53 |=============================================================== clpeak 1.1.2 OpenCL Test: Global Memory Bandwidth GBPS > Higher Is Better 1050ti . 93.19 |=============================================================== LeelaChessZero 0.30 Backend: OpenCL Nodes Per Second > Higher Is Better Rodinia 3.1 Test: OpenCL Particle Filter Seconds < Lower Is Better 1050ti . 21.94 |=============================================================== LuxCoreRender 2.6 Scene: DLSC - Acceleration: GPU M samples/sec > Higher Is Better 1050ti . 0.66 |================================================================ LuxCoreRender 2.6 Scene: Danish Mood - Acceleration: GPU M samples/sec > Higher Is Better 1050ti . 0.56 |================================================================ LuxCoreRender 2.6 Scene: Orange Juice - Acceleration: GPU M samples/sec > Higher Is Better 1050ti . 0.86 |================================================================ LuxCoreRender 2.6 Scene: LuxCore Benchmark - Acceleration: GPU M samples/sec > Higher Is Better 1050ti . 0.64 |================================================================ LuxCoreRender 2.6 Scene: Rainbow Colors and Prism - Acceleration: GPU M samples/sec > Higher Is Better 1050ti . 3.95 |================================================================ ArrayFire 3.9 Test: Conjugate Gradient OpenCL ms < Lower Is Better 1050ti . 7.707 |=============================================================== FinanceBench 2016-07-25 Benchmark: Black-Scholes OpenCL ms < Lower Is Better 1050ti . 31.32 |=============================================================== ViennaCL 1.7.1 Test: CPU BLAS - sCOPY GB/s > Higher Is Better 1050ti . 1623 |================================================================ ViennaCL 1.7.1 Test: CPU BLAS - sAXPY GB/s > Higher Is Better 1050ti . 2160 |================================================================ ViennaCL 1.7.1 Test: CPU BLAS - sDOT GB/s > Higher Is Better 1050ti . 539 |================================================================= ViennaCL 1.7.1 Test: CPU BLAS - dCOPY GB/s > Higher Is Better 1050ti . 412 |================================================================= ViennaCL 1.7.1 Test: CPU BLAS - dAXPY GB/s > Higher Is Better 1050ti . 620 |================================================================= ViennaCL 1.7.1 Test: CPU BLAS - dDOT GB/s > Higher Is Better 1050ti . 708 |================================================================= ViennaCL 1.7.1 Test: CPU BLAS - dGEMV-N GB/s > Higher Is Better 1050ti . 383 |================================================================= ViennaCL 1.7.1 Test: CPU BLAS - dGEMV-T GB/s > Higher Is Better 1050ti . 540 |================================================================= ViennaCL 1.7.1 Test: CPU BLAS - dGEMM-NN GFLOPs/s > Higher Is Better 1050ti . 106 |================================================================= ViennaCL 1.7.1 Test: CPU BLAS - dGEMM-NT GFLOPs/s > Higher Is Better 1050ti . 101 |================================================================= ViennaCL 1.7.1 Test: CPU BLAS - dGEMM-TN GFLOPs/s > Higher Is Better 1050ti . 110 |================================================================= ViennaCL 1.7.1 Test: CPU BLAS - dGEMM-TT GFLOPs/s > Higher Is Better 1050ti . 105 |================================================================= ViennaCL 1.7.1 Test: OpenCL BLAS - sCOPY GB/s > Higher Is Better 1050ti . 84.4 |================================================================ ViennaCL 1.7.1 Test: OpenCL BLAS - sAXPY GB/s > Higher Is Better 1050ti . 93.7 |================================================================ ViennaCL 1.7.1 Test: OpenCL BLAS - sDOT GB/s > Higher Is Better 1050ti . 91.1 |================================================================ ViennaCL 1.7.1 Test: OpenCL BLAS - dCOPY GB/s > Higher Is Better 1050ti . 93.6 |================================================================ ViennaCL 1.7.1 Test: OpenCL BLAS - dAXPY GB/s > Higher Is Better 1050ti . 97 |================================================================== ViennaCL 1.7.1 Test: OpenCL BLAS - dDOT GB/s > Higher Is Better 1050ti . 101 |================================================================= ViennaCL 1.7.1 Test: OpenCL BLAS - dGEMV-N GB/s > Higher Is Better 1050ti . 86.5 |================================================================ ViennaCL 1.7.1 Test: OpenCL BLAS - dGEMV-T GB/s > Higher Is Better 1050ti . 92.1 |================================================================ ViennaCL 1.7.1 Test: OpenCL BLAS - dGEMM-NN GFLOPs/s > Higher Is Better 1050ti . 67.7 |================================================================ ViennaCL 1.7.1 Test: OpenCL BLAS - dGEMM-NT GFLOPs/s > Higher Is Better 1050ti . 67.7 |================================================================ ViennaCL 1.7.1 Test: OpenCL BLAS - dGEMM-TT GFLOPs/s > Higher Is Better 1050ti . 67.6 |================================================================ ViennaCL 1.7.1 Test: OpenCL BLAS - dGEMM-TN GFLOPs/s > Higher Is Better 1050ti . 68.0 |================================================================ GROMACS 2024 Implementation: NVIDIA CUDA GPU - Input: water_GMX50_bare Ns Per Day > Higher Is Better Caffe 2020-02-13 Model: AlexNet - Acceleration: NVIDIA CUDA - Iterations: 100 Milli-Seconds < Lower Is Better Caffe 2020-02-13 Model: AlexNet - Acceleration: NVIDIA CUDA - Iterations: 200 Milli-Seconds < Lower Is Better Caffe 2020-02-13 Model: AlexNet - Acceleration: NVIDIA CUDA - Iterations: 1000 Milli-Seconds < Lower Is Better Caffe 2020-02-13 Model: GoogleNet - Acceleration: NVIDIA CUDA - Iterations: 100 Milli-Seconds < Lower Is Better Caffe 2020-02-13 Model: GoogleNet - Acceleration: NVIDIA CUDA - Iterations: 200 Milli-Seconds < Lower Is Better Caffe 2020-02-13 Model: GoogleNet - Acceleration: NVIDIA CUDA - Iterations: 1000 Milli-Seconds < Lower Is Better NCNN 20230517 Target: Vulkan GPU - Model: mobilenet ms < Lower Is Better 1050ti . 12.28 |=============================================================== NCNN 20230517 Target: Vulkan GPU-v2-v2 - Model: mobilenet-v2 ms < Lower Is Better 1050ti . 5.65 |================================================================ NCNN 20230517 Target: Vulkan GPU-v3-v3 - Model: mobilenet-v3 ms < Lower Is Better 1050ti . 5.62 |================================================================ NCNN 20230517 Target: Vulkan GPU - Model: shufflenet-v2 ms < Lower Is Better 1050ti . 7.32 |================================================================ NCNN 20230517 Target: Vulkan GPU - Model: mnasnet ms < Lower Is Better 1050ti . 5.37 |================================================================ NCNN 20230517 Target: Vulkan GPU - Model: efficientnet-b0 ms < Lower Is Better 1050ti . 7.27 |================================================================ NCNN 20230517 Target: Vulkan GPU - Model: blazeface ms < Lower Is Better 1050ti . 2.82 |================================================================ NCNN 20230517 Target: Vulkan GPU - Model: googlenet ms < Lower Is Better 1050ti . 14.30 |=============================================================== NCNN 20230517 Target: Vulkan GPU - Model: vgg16 ms < Lower Is Better 1050ti . 21.50 |=============================================================== NCNN 20230517 Target: Vulkan GPU - Model: resnet18 ms < Lower Is Better 1050ti . 6.91 |================================================================ NCNN 20230517 Target: Vulkan GPU - Model: alexnet ms < Lower Is Better 1050ti . 4.67 |================================================================ NCNN 20230517 Target: Vulkan GPU - Model: resnet50 ms < Lower Is Better 1050ti . 11.08 |=============================================================== NCNN 20230517 Target: Vulkan GPU - Model: yolov4-tiny ms < Lower Is Better 1050ti . 20.94 |=============================================================== NCNN 20230517 Target: Vulkan GPU - Model: squeezenet_ssd ms < Lower Is Better 1050ti . 12.05 |=============================================================== NCNN 20230517 Target: Vulkan GPU - Model: regnety_400m ms < Lower Is Better 1050ti . 15.92 |=============================================================== NCNN 20230517 Target: Vulkan GPU - Model: vision_transformer ms < Lower Is Better 1050ti . 36.57 |=============================================================== NCNN 20230517 Target: Vulkan GPU - Model: FastestDet ms < Lower Is Better 1050ti . 9.26 |================================================================ PlaidML FP16: No - Mode: Training - Network: Mobilenet - Device: OpenCL Examples Per Second > Higher Is Better PlaidML FP16: No - Mode: Inference - Network: IMDB LSTM - Device: OpenCL Examples Per Second > Higher Is Better PlaidML FP16: No - Mode: Inference - Network: Mobilenet - Device: OpenCL Examples Per Second > Higher Is Better PlaidML FP16: Yes - Mode: Inference - Network: Mobilenet - Device: OpenCL Examples Per Second > Higher Is Better PlaidML FP16: No - Mode: Inference - Network: DenseNet 201 - Device: OpenCL Examples Per Second > Higher Is Better Blender 4.0 Blend File: BMW27 - Compute: NVIDIA OptiX Seconds < Lower Is Better 1050ti . 154.40 |============================================================== Blender 4.0 Blend File: Classroom - Compute: NVIDIA OptiX Seconds < Lower Is Better 1050ti . 309.65 |============================================================== Blender 4.0 Blend File: Fishy Cat - Compute: NVIDIA OptiX Seconds < Lower Is Better 1050ti . 307.32 |============================================================== Blender 4.0 Blend File: Barbershop - Compute: NVIDIA OptiX Seconds < Lower Is Better 1050ti . 1204.68 |============================================================= Blender 4.0 Blend File: Pabellon Barcelona - Compute: NVIDIA OptiX Seconds < Lower Is Better 1050ti . 775.18 |============================================================== IndigoBench 4.4 Acceleration: OpenCL GPU - Scene: Bedroom M samples/s > Higher Is Better 1050ti . 2.314 |=============================================================== IndigoBench 4.4 Acceleration: OpenCL GPU - Scene: Supercar M samples/s > Higher Is Better 1050ti . 6.402 |=============================================================== MandelGPU 1.3pts1 OpenCL Device: GPU Samples/sec > Higher Is Better 1050ti . 68414867.2 |========================================================== NeatBench 5 Acceleration: GPU FPS > Higher Is Better 1050ti . 1050 |================================================================ Chaos Group V-RAY 6.0 Mode: NVIDIA RTX GPU Vrays > Higher Is Better Chaos Group V-RAY 6.0 Mode: NVIDIA CUDA GPU Vrays > Higher Is Better