benchmark1 kvm-5 testing benchmark1: Processor: 32 x Intel Xeon E312xx (Sandy Bridge IBRS update) (32 Cores), Motherboard: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX 1996) (1.15.0-1 BIOS), Chipset: Intel 440FX 82441FX PMC, Memory: 32 x 16 GB RAM QEMU, Disk: 1100GB QEMU HDD, Graphics: Cirrus Logic GD 5446, Network: Red Hat Virtio device OS: Ubuntu 22.04, Kernel: 5.15.0-100-generic (x86_64), Compiler: GCC 11.4.0, File-System: ext4, System Layer: microsoft SQLite 3.30.1 Threads / Copies: 1 Seconds < Lower Is Better benchmark1 . 14.51 |=========================================================== SQLite 3.30.1 Threads / Copies: 8 Seconds < Lower Is Better benchmark1 . 28.32 |=========================================================== SQLite 3.30.1 Threads / Copies: 32 Seconds < Lower Is Better benchmark1 . 61.17 |=========================================================== SQLite 3.30.1 Threads / Copies: 64 Seconds < Lower Is Better benchmark1 . 92.23 |=========================================================== SQLite 3.30.1 Threads / Copies: 128 Seconds < Lower Is Better benchmark1 . 139.12 |========================================================== OSBench Test: Create Files us Per Event < Lower Is Better benchmark1 . 16.24 |=========================================================== OSBench Test: Create Threads us Per Event < Lower Is Better benchmark1 . 19.00 |=========================================================== OSBench Test: Launch Programs us Per Event < Lower Is Better benchmark1 . 56.06 |=========================================================== OSBench Test: Create Processes us Per Event < Lower Is Better benchmark1 . 44.30 |=========================================================== OSBench Test: Memory Allocations Ns Per Event < Lower Is Better benchmark1 . 81.75 |=========================================================== LZ4 Compression 1.9.4 Compression Level: 1 - Compression Speed MB/s > Higher Is Better benchmark1 . 670.27 |========================================================== LZ4 Compression 1.9.4 Compression Level: 1 - Decompression Speed MB/s > Higher Is Better benchmark1 . 4157.5 |========================================================== LZ4 Compression 1.9.4 Compression Level: 3 - Compression Speed MB/s > Higher Is Better benchmark1 . 106.79 |========================================================== LZ4 Compression 1.9.4 Compression Level: 3 - Decompression Speed MB/s > Higher Is Better benchmark1 . 3800.8 |========================================================== LZ4 Compression 1.9.4 Compression Level: 9 - Compression Speed MB/s > Higher Is Better benchmark1 . 35.61 |=========================================================== LZ4 Compression 1.9.4 Compression Level: 9 - Decompression Speed MB/s > Higher Is Better benchmark1 . 4007.6 |========================================================== Zstd Compression 1.5.4 Compression Level: 3 - Compression Speed MB/s > Higher Is Better benchmark1 . 2418.5 |========================================================== Zstd Compression 1.5.4 Compression Level: 8 - Compression Speed MB/s > Higher Is Better benchmark1 . 911.2 |=========================================================== Zstd Compression 1.5.4 Compression Level: 8 - Decompression Speed MB/s > Higher Is Better benchmark1 . 1294.7 |========================================================== Zstd Compression 1.5.4 Compression Level: 12 - Compression Speed MB/s > Higher Is Better benchmark1 . 231.6 |=========================================================== Zstd Compression 1.5.4 Compression Level: 12 - Decompression Speed MB/s > Higher Is Better benchmark1 . 1321.1 |========================================================== Zstd Compression 1.5.4 Compression Level: 19 - Compression Speed MB/s > Higher Is Better benchmark1 . 15.3 |============================================================ Zstd Compression 1.5.4 Compression Level: 19 - Decompression Speed MB/s > Higher Is Better benchmark1 . 1177.7 |========================================================== Zstd Compression 1.5.4 Compression Level: 3, Long Mode - Compression Speed MB/s > Higher Is Better benchmark1 . 451.6 |=========================================================== Zstd Compression 1.5.4 Compression Level: 3, Long Mode - Decompression Speed MB/s > Higher Is Better benchmark1 . 1213.2 |========================================================== Zstd Compression 1.5.4 Compression Level: 8, Long Mode - Compression Speed MB/s > Higher Is Better benchmark1 . 634.8 |=========================================================== Zstd Compression 1.5.4 Compression Level: 8, Long Mode - Decompression Speed MB/s > Higher Is Better benchmark1 . 1299.0 |========================================================== Zstd Compression 1.5.4 Compression Level: 19, Long Mode - Compression Speed MB/s > Higher Is Better benchmark1 . 7.52 |============================================================ Zstd Compression 1.5.4 Compression Level: 19, Long Mode - Decompression Speed MB/s > Higher Is Better benchmark1 . 1118.7 |========================================================== 7-Zip Compression 22.01 Test: Compression Rating MIPS > Higher Is Better benchmark1 . 153803 |========================================================== 7-Zip Compression 22.01 Test: Decompression Rating MIPS > Higher Is Better benchmark1 . 127486 |========================================================== Timed FFmpeg Compilation 6.1 Time To Compile Seconds < Lower Is Better benchmark1 . 26.43 |=========================================================== Timed Linux Kernel Compilation 6.1 Build: defconfig Seconds < Lower Is Better benchmark1 . 49.44 |=========================================================== Timed PHP Compilation 8.1.9 Time To Compile Seconds < Lower Is Better benchmark1 . 47.72 |=========================================================== Timed CPython Compilation 3.10.6 Build Configuration: Default Seconds < Lower Is Better benchmark1 . 17.44 |=========================================================== Parallel BZIP2 Compression 1.1.13 FreeBSD-13.0-RELEASE-amd64-memstick.img Compression Seconds < Lower Is Better benchmark1 . 3.622407 |======================================================== Gzip Compression Linux Source Tree Archiving To .tar.gz Seconds < Lower Is Better benchmark1 . 40.53 |=========================================================== XZ Compression 5.2.4 Compressing ubuntu-16.04.3-server-i386.img, Compression Level 9 Seconds < Lower Is Better benchmark1 . 23.59 |=========================================================== FLAC Audio Encoding 1.4 WAV To FLAC Seconds < Lower Is Better benchmark1 . 23.72 |=========================================================== Gcrypt Library 1.9 Seconds < Lower Is Better benchmark1 . 230.90 |========================================================== System GZIP Decompression Seconds < Lower Is Better benchmark1 . 3.272 |=========================================================== System XZ Decompression Seconds < Lower Is Better benchmark1 . 3.521 |=========================================================== System ZLIB Decompression 1.2.7 ms < Lower Is Better benchmark1 . 1713.93 |========================================================= OpenSSL 3.1 Algorithm: SHA256 byte/s > Higher Is Better benchmark1 . 9273922607 |====================================================== OpenSSL 3.1 Algorithm: SHA512 byte/s > Higher Is Better benchmark1 . 9184916333 |====================================================== OpenSSL 3.1 Algorithm: RSA4096 sign/s > Higher Is Better benchmark1 . 4783.0 |========================================================== OpenSSL 3.1 Algorithm: RSA4096 verify/s > Higher Is Better benchmark1 . 312702.4 |======================================================== OpenSSL 3.1 Algorithm: ChaCha20 byte/s > Higher Is Better benchmark1 . 51552001680 |===================================================== OpenSSL 3.1 Algorithm: AES-128-GCM byte/s > Higher Is Better benchmark1 . 112251603173 |==================================================== OpenSSL 3.1 Algorithm: AES-256-GCM byte/s > Higher Is Better benchmark1 . 103496803030 |==================================================== OpenSSL 3.1 Algorithm: ChaCha20-Poly1305 byte/s > Higher Is Better benchmark1 . 38130242993 |===================================================== ClickHouse 22.12.3.5 100M Rows Hits Dataset, First Run / Cold Cache Queries Per Minute, Geo Mean > Higher Is Better benchmark1 . 282.81 |========================================================== ClickHouse 22.12.3.5 100M Rows Hits Dataset, Second Run Queries Per Minute, Geo Mean > Higher Is Better benchmark1 . 297.07 |========================================================== ClickHouse 22.12.3.5 100M Rows Hits Dataset, Third Run Queries Per Minute, Geo Mean > Higher Is Better benchmark1 . 294.80 |========================================================== Redis 7.0.4 Test: GET - Parallel Connections: 50 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better benchmark1 . 3077298.8 |======================================================= Redis 7.0.4 Test: SET - Parallel Connections: 50 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better benchmark1 . 2155467.33 |====================================================== Redis 7.0.4 Test: GET - Parallel Connections: 500 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better benchmark1 . 1898002.29 |====================================================== Redis 7.0.4 Test: LPOP - Parallel Connections: 50 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better benchmark1 . 3095040.83 |====================================================== Redis 7.0.4 Test: SADD - Parallel Connections: 50 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better benchmark1 . 2451916.7 |======================================================= Redis 7.0.4 Test: SET - Parallel Connections: 500 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better benchmark1 . 1561463.12 |====================================================== Redis 7.0.4 Test: GET - Parallel Connections: 1000 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better benchmark1 . 2008311.88 |====================================================== Redis 7.0.4 Test: LPOP - Parallel Connections: 500 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better benchmark1 . 2315503.42 |====================================================== Redis 7.0.4 Test: LPUSH - Parallel Connections: 50 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better benchmark1 . 1627481.04 |====================================================== Redis 7.0.4 Test: SADD - Parallel Connections: 500 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better benchmark1 . 1776199.21 |====================================================== Redis 7.0.4 Test: SET - Parallel Connections: 1000 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better benchmark1 . 1642766.46 |====================================================== Redis 7.0.4 Test: LPOP - Parallel Connections: 1000 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better benchmark1 . 1357425.17 |====================================================== Redis 7.0.4 Test: LPUSH - Parallel Connections: 500 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better benchmark1 . 1337782.41 |====================================================== Redis 7.0.4 Test: SADD - Parallel Connections: 1000 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better benchmark1 . 1859846.75 |====================================================== Redis 7.0.4 Test: LPUSH - Parallel Connections: 1000 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better benchmark1 . 1412245.29 |====================================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better benchmark1 . 51611 |=========================================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better benchmark1 . 0.020 |=========================================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better benchmark1 . 1576 |============================================================ PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better benchmark1 . 0.636 |=========================================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better benchmark1 . 1121243 |========================================================= PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better benchmark1 . 0.045 |=========================================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better benchmark1 . 1328914 |========================================================= PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better benchmark1 . 0.075 |=========================================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better benchmark1 . 1279152 |========================================================= PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better benchmark1 . 0.195 |=========================================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better benchmark1 . 1088 |============================================================ PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better benchmark1 . 45.95 |=========================================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better benchmark1 . 1020610 |========================================================= PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better benchmark1 . 0.490 |=========================================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 800 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better benchmark1 . 1069276 |========================================================= PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 800 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better benchmark1 . 0.748 |=========================================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better benchmark1 . 42728 |=========================================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better benchmark1 . 0.024 |=========================================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better benchmark1 . 1001 |============================================================ PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better benchmark1 . 99.88 |=========================================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 1000 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better benchmark1 . 1070152 |========================================================= PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 1000 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better benchmark1 . 0.935 |=========================================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better benchmark1 . 890 |============================================================= PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better benchmark1 . 281.11 |========================================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better benchmark1 . 713 |============================================================= PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better benchmark1 . 701.88 |========================================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 5000 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 800 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better benchmark1 . 604 |============================================================= PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 800 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better benchmark1 . 1326.00 |========================================================= PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better benchmark1 . 1203 |============================================================ PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better benchmark1 . 0.831 |=========================================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better benchmark1 . 976596 |========================================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better benchmark1 . 0.051 |=========================================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better benchmark1 . 40117 |=========================================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better benchmark1 . 0.025 |=========================================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 1000 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better benchmark1 . 523 |============================================================= PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 1000 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better benchmark1 . 1914.00 |========================================================= PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 5000 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better benchmark1 . 1046261 |========================================================= PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better benchmark1 . 0.096 |=========================================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better benchmark1 . 1099830 |========================================================= PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better benchmark1 . 0.227 |=========================================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better benchmark1 . 18654 |=========================================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better benchmark1 . 2.681 |=========================================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better benchmark1 . 926597 |========================================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better benchmark1 . 0.540 |=========================================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 800 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better benchmark1 . 939527 |========================================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 800 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better benchmark1 . 0.852 |=========================================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better benchmark1 . 993 |============================================================= PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better benchmark1 . 1.007 |=========================================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better benchmark1 . 645408 |========================================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better benchmark1 . 0.077 |=========================================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better benchmark1 . 33783 |=========================================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better benchmark1 . 0.030 |=========================================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better benchmark1 . 22679 |=========================================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better benchmark1 . 4.410 |=========================================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 1000 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better benchmark1 . 937594 |========================================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 1000 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better benchmark1 . 1.067 |=========================================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better benchmark1 . 25600 |=========================================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better benchmark1 . 9.766 |=========================================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better benchmark1 . 25012 |=========================================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better benchmark1 . 19.99 |=========================================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 5000 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 800 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better benchmark1 . 23879 |=========================================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 800 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better benchmark1 . 33.51 |=========================================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better benchmark1 . 610866 |========================================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better benchmark1 . 0.164 |=========================================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better benchmark1 . 643135 |========================================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better benchmark1 . 0.393 |=========================================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better benchmark1 . 9507 |============================================================ PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better benchmark1 . 5.260 |=========================================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better benchmark1 . 703106 |========================================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better benchmark1 . 0.711 |=========================================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 800 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better benchmark1 . 696939 |========================================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 800 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better benchmark1 . 1.148 |=========================================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better benchmark1 . 1044 |============================================================ PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better benchmark1 . 0.961 |=========================================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better benchmark1 . 513831 |========================================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better benchmark1 . 0.097 |=========================================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 1000 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better benchmark1 . 22787 |=========================================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 1000 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better benchmark1 . 43.89 |=========================================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 5000 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better benchmark1 . 11964 |=========================================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better benchmark1 . 8.359 |=========================================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 1000 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better benchmark1 . 692888 |========================================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 1000 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better benchmark1 . 1.443 |=========================================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better benchmark1 . 13619 |=========================================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better benchmark1 . 18.37 |=========================================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better benchmark1 . 9611 |============================================================ PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better benchmark1 . 52.03 |=========================================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 5000 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 800 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better benchmark1 . 10847 |=========================================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 800 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better benchmark1 . 73.75 |=========================================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better benchmark1 . 434191 |========================================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better benchmark1 . 0.230 |=========================================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better benchmark1 . 533283 |========================================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better benchmark1 . 0.469 |=========================================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better benchmark1 . 7962 |============================================================ PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better benchmark1 . 6.280 |=========================================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better benchmark1 . 552466 |========================================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better benchmark1 . 0.905 |=========================================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 800 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better benchmark1 . 562942 |========================================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 800 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better benchmark1 . 1.421 |=========================================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 1000 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better benchmark1 . 11548 |=========================================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 1000 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better benchmark1 . 86.67 |=========================================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 5000 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better benchmark1 . 9399 |============================================================ PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better benchmark1 . 10.64 |=========================================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 1000 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better benchmark1 . 556520 |========================================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 1000 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better benchmark1 . 1.797 |=========================================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better benchmark1 . 8915 |============================================================ PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better benchmark1 . 28.05 |=========================================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better benchmark1 . 7766 |============================================================ PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better benchmark1 . 64.39 |=========================================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 5000 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 800 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better benchmark1 . 8493 |============================================================ PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 800 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better benchmark1 . 94.23 |=========================================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 1000 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better benchmark1 . 8366 |============================================================ PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 1000 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better benchmark1 . 119.58 |========================================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 5000 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better nginx 1.23.2 Connections: 1 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better nginx 1.23.2 Connections: 20 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better nginx 1.23.2 Connections: 100 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better benchmark1 . 66899.47 |======================================================== nginx 1.23.2 Connections: 200 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better benchmark1 . 66803.67 |======================================================== nginx 1.23.2 Connections: 500 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better benchmark1 . 66994.42 |======================================================== nginx 1.23.2 Connections: 1000 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better benchmark1 . 68221.14 |======================================================== nginx 1.23.2 Connections: 4000 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HTTP Server 2.4.56 Concurrent Requests: 4 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HTTP Server 2.4.56 Concurrent Requests: 20 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HTTP Server 2.4.56 Concurrent Requests: 100 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better benchmark1 . 64921.53 |======================================================== Apache HTTP Server 2.4.56 Concurrent Requests: 200 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better benchmark1 . 90671.97 |======================================================== Apache HTTP Server 2.4.56 Concurrent Requests: 500 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better benchmark1 . 107367.61 |======================================================= Apache HTTP Server 2.4.56 Concurrent Requests: 1000 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better benchmark1 . 101459.03 |======================================================= PHPBench 0.8.1 PHP Benchmark Suite Score > Higher Is Better benchmark1 . 738250 |========================================================== RAR Compression 6.0.2 Linux Source Tree Archiving To RAR Seconds < Lower Is Better benchmark1 . 122.23 |========================================================== PHP Micro Benchmarks Test: Zend bench Seconds < Lower Is Better benchmark1 . 0.329 |=========================================================== PHP Micro Benchmarks Test: Zend micro_bench Seconds < Lower Is Better benchmark1 . 1.658 |=========================================================== InfluxDB 1.8.2 Concurrent Streams: 4 - Batch Size: 10000 - Tags: 2,5000,1 - Points Per Series: 10000 val/sec > Higher Is Better benchmark1 . 1014938.2 |======================================================= InfluxDB 1.8.2 Concurrent Streams: 64 - Batch Size: 10000 - Tags: 2,5000,1 - Points Per Series: 10000 val/sec > Higher Is Better benchmark1 . 1360914.0 |======================================================= InfluxDB 1.8.2 Concurrent Streams: 1024 - Batch Size: 10000 - Tags: 2,5000,1 - Points Per Series: 10000 val/sec > Higher Is Better benchmark1 . 1431827.2 |=======================================================