benchmark2 kvm-6 testing benchmark2: Processor: 32 x Intel Xeon E312xx (Sandy Bridge IBRS update) (32 Cores), Motherboard: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX 1996) (1.15.0-1 BIOS), Chipset: Intel 440FX 82441FX PMC, Memory: 16 x GB RAM QEMU, Disk: 1100GB QEMU HDD, Graphics: Cirrus Logic GD 5446, Network: Red Hat Virtio device OS: Ubuntu 22.04, Kernel: 5.15.0-100-generic (x86_64), Compiler: GCC 11.4.0, File-System: ext4, System Layer: microsoft OpenSSL 3.1 Algorithm: SHA256 byte/s > Higher Is Better benchmark2 . 9294869883 |====================================================== OpenSSL 3.1 Algorithm: SHA512 byte/s > Higher Is Better benchmark2 . 9185914147 |====================================================== OpenSSL 3.1 Algorithm: ChaCha20 byte/s > Higher Is Better benchmark2 . 51553981967 |===================================================== OpenSSL 3.1 Algorithm: AES-128-GCM byte/s > Higher Is Better benchmark2 . 112050078787 |==================================================== OpenSSL 3.1 Algorithm: AES-256-GCM byte/s > Higher Is Better benchmark2 . 103521589930 |==================================================== OpenSSL 3.1 Algorithm: ChaCha20-Poly1305 byte/s > Higher Is Better benchmark2 . 38134651563 |===================================================== LZ4 Compression 1.9.4 Compression Level: 1 - Compression Speed MB/s > Higher Is Better benchmark2 . 673.57 |========================================================== LZ4 Compression 1.9.4 Compression Level: 1 - Decompression Speed MB/s > Higher Is Better benchmark2 . 4174.4 |========================================================== LZ4 Compression 1.9.4 Compression Level: 3 - Compression Speed MB/s > Higher Is Better benchmark2 . 106.53 |========================================================== LZ4 Compression 1.9.4 Compression Level: 3 - Decompression Speed MB/s > Higher Is Better benchmark2 . 3813.4 |========================================================== LZ4 Compression 1.9.4 Compression Level: 9 - Compression Speed MB/s > Higher Is Better benchmark2 . 35.93 |=========================================================== LZ4 Compression 1.9.4 Compression Level: 9 - Decompression Speed MB/s > Higher Is Better benchmark2 . 4019 |============================================================ Zstd Compression 1.5.4 Compression Level: 3 - Compression Speed MB/s > Higher Is Better benchmark2 . 2407.8 |========================================================== Zstd Compression 1.5.4 Compression Level: 8 - Compression Speed MB/s > Higher Is Better benchmark2 . 921.3 |=========================================================== Zstd Compression 1.5.4 Compression Level: 8 - Decompression Speed MB/s > Higher Is Better benchmark2 . 1294.4 |========================================================== Zstd Compression 1.5.4 Compression Level: 12 - Compression Speed MB/s > Higher Is Better benchmark2 . 235.4 |=========================================================== Zstd Compression 1.5.4 Compression Level: 12 - Decompression Speed MB/s > Higher Is Better benchmark2 . 1339.6 |========================================================== Zstd Compression 1.5.4 Compression Level: 19 - Compression Speed MB/s > Higher Is Better benchmark2 . 16 |============================================================== Zstd Compression 1.5.4 Compression Level: 19 - Decompression Speed MB/s > Higher Is Better benchmark2 . 1161.2 |========================================================== Zstd Compression 1.5.4 Compression Level: 3, Long Mode - Compression Speed MB/s > Higher Is Better benchmark2 . 460.2 |=========================================================== Zstd Compression 1.5.4 Compression Level: 3, Long Mode - Decompression Speed MB/s > Higher Is Better benchmark2 . 1212.6 |========================================================== Zstd Compression 1.5.4 Compression Level: 8, Long Mode - Compression Speed MB/s > Higher Is Better benchmark2 . 642.7 |=========================================================== Zstd Compression 1.5.4 Compression Level: 19, Long Mode - Compression Speed MB/s > Higher Is Better benchmark2 . 7.73 |============================================================ Zstd Compression 1.5.4 Compression Level: 19, Long Mode - Decompression Speed MB/s > Higher Is Better benchmark2 . 1129.9 |========================================================== 7-Zip Compression 22.01 Test: Compression Rating MIPS > Higher Is Better benchmark2 . 159304 |========================================================== 7-Zip Compression 22.01 Test: Decompression Rating MIPS > Higher Is Better benchmark2 . 127842 |========================================================== ClickHouse 22.12.3.5 100M Rows Hits Dataset, First Run / Cold Cache Queries Per Minute, Geo Mean > Higher Is Better benchmark2 . 284.10 |========================================================== ClickHouse 22.12.3.5 100M Rows Hits Dataset, Second Run Queries Per Minute, Geo Mean > Higher Is Better benchmark2 . 297.87 |========================================================== ClickHouse 22.12.3.5 100M Rows Hits Dataset, Third Run Queries Per Minute, Geo Mean > Higher Is Better benchmark2 . 298.94 |========================================================== Redis 7.0.4 Test: GET - Parallel Connections: 50 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better benchmark2 . 3028812.08 |====================================================== Redis 7.0.4 Test: SET - Parallel Connections: 50 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better benchmark2 . 2127263.21 |====================================================== Redis 7.0.4 Test: GET - Parallel Connections: 500 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better benchmark2 . 1899691.00 |====================================================== Redis 7.0.4 Test: LPOP - Parallel Connections: 50 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better benchmark2 . 3080945.19 |====================================================== Redis 7.0.4 Test: SADD - Parallel Connections: 50 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better benchmark2 . 2385045.17 |====================================================== Redis 7.0.4 Test: SET - Parallel Connections: 500 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better benchmark2 . 1556050.8 |======================================================= Redis 7.0.4 Test: GET - Parallel Connections: 1000 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better benchmark2 . 1970243.03 |====================================================== Redis 7.0.4 Test: LPOP - Parallel Connections: 500 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better benchmark2 . 2241125.8 |======================================================= Redis 7.0.4 Test: LPUSH - Parallel Connections: 50 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better benchmark2 . 1578123.79 |====================================================== Redis 7.0.4 Test: SADD - Parallel Connections: 500 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better benchmark2 . 1732895.37 |====================================================== Redis 7.0.4 Test: SET - Parallel Connections: 1000 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better benchmark2 . 1644080.29 |====================================================== Redis 7.0.4 Test: LPOP - Parallel Connections: 1000 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better benchmark2 . 1355051.50 |====================================================== Redis 7.0.4 Test: LPUSH - Parallel Connections: 500 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better benchmark2 . 1321441.45 |====================================================== Redis 7.0.4 Test: SADD - Parallel Connections: 1000 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better benchmark2 . 1823507.96 |====================================================== Redis 7.0.4 Test: LPUSH - Parallel Connections: 1000 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better benchmark2 . 1372927.21 |====================================================== nginx 1.23.2 Connections: 1 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better nginx 1.23.2 Connections: 20 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better nginx 1.23.2 Connections: 100 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better benchmark2 . 66676.43 |======================================================== nginx 1.23.2 Connections: 200 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better benchmark2 . 66697.23 |======================================================== nginx 1.23.2 Connections: 500 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better benchmark2 . 66500.81 |======================================================== nginx 1.23.2 Connections: 1000 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better benchmark2 . 67687.75 |======================================================== nginx 1.23.2 Connections: 4000 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HTTP Server 2.4.56 Concurrent Requests: 4 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HTTP Server 2.4.56 Concurrent Requests: 20 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HTTP Server 2.4.56 Concurrent Requests: 100 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better benchmark2 . 63073.62 |======================================================== Apache HTTP Server 2.4.56 Concurrent Requests: 200 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better benchmark2 . 91651.79 |======================================================== Apache HTTP Server 2.4.56 Concurrent Requests: 500 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better benchmark2 . 105764.25 |======================================================= Apache HTTP Server 2.4.56 Concurrent Requests: 1000 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better benchmark2 . 99150.22 |======================================================== PHPBench 0.8.1 PHP Benchmark Suite Score > Higher Is Better benchmark2 . 728603 |========================================================== OpenSSL 3.1 Algorithm: RSA4096 sign/s > Higher Is Better benchmark2 . 4780.8 |========================================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better benchmark2 . 50629 |=========================================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better benchmark2 . 1743 |============================================================ PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better benchmark2 . 1136232 |========================================================= PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better benchmark2 . 1324375 |========================================================= PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better benchmark2 . 1325094 |========================================================= PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better benchmark2 . 1099 |============================================================ PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better benchmark2 . 1056100 |========================================================= PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 800 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better benchmark2 . 1084491 |========================================================= PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better benchmark2 . 44960 |=========================================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better benchmark2 . 1007 |============================================================ PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 1000 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better benchmark2 . 1117960 |========================================================= PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better benchmark2 . 875 |============================================================= PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better benchmark2 . 698 |============================================================= PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 5000 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 800 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better benchmark2 . 583 |============================================================= PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better benchmark2 . 1207 |============================================================ PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better benchmark2 . 977976 |========================================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better benchmark2 . 38561 |=========================================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 1000 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better benchmark2 . 501 |============================================================= PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 5000 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better benchmark2 . 1031743 |========================================================= PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better benchmark2 . 1110481 |========================================================= PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better benchmark2 . 21068 |=========================================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better benchmark2 . 928639 |========================================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 800 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better benchmark2 . 932077 |========================================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better benchmark2 . 1006 |============================================================ PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better benchmark2 . 660252 |========================================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better benchmark2 . 13941 |=========================================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better benchmark2 . 24523 |=========================================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 1000 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better benchmark2 . 929440 |========================================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better benchmark2 . 27077 |=========================================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better benchmark2 . 25853 |=========================================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 5000 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 800 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better benchmark2 . 24347 |=========================================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better benchmark2 . 627725 |========================================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better benchmark2 . 685838 |========================================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better benchmark2 . 11055 |=========================================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better benchmark2 . 693044 |========================================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 800 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better benchmark2 . 693689 |========================================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better benchmark2 . 972 |============================================================= PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better benchmark2 . 477627 |========================================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 1000 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better benchmark2 . 23998 |=========================================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 5000 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better benchmark2 . 13434 |=========================================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 1000 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better benchmark2 . 686666 |========================================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better benchmark2 . 13416 |=========================================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better benchmark2 . 10420 |=========================================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 5000 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 800 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better benchmark2 . 12102 |=========================================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better benchmark2 . 429019 |========================================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better benchmark2 . 529985 |========================================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better benchmark2 . 9460 |============================================================ PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better benchmark2 . 547428 |========================================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 800 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better benchmark2 . 546445 |========================================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 1000 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better benchmark2 . 13111 |=========================================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 5000 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better benchmark2 . 8153 |============================================================ PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 1000 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better benchmark2 . 552542 |========================================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better benchmark2 . 8099 |============================================================ PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better benchmark2 . 8406 |============================================================ PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 5000 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 800 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better benchmark2 . 9130 |============================================================ PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 1000 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better benchmark2 . 9181 |============================================================ PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 5000 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better InfluxDB 1.8.2 Concurrent Streams: 4 - Batch Size: 10000 - Tags: 2,5000,1 - Points Per Series: 10000 val/sec > Higher Is Better benchmark2 . 1043266.5 |======================================================= InfluxDB 1.8.2 Concurrent Streams: 64 - Batch Size: 10000 - Tags: 2,5000,1 - Points Per Series: 10000 val/sec > Higher Is Better benchmark2 . 1361294.2 |======================================================= InfluxDB 1.8.2 Concurrent Streams: 1024 - Batch Size: 10000 - Tags: 2,5000,1 - Points Per Series: 10000 val/sec > Higher Is Better benchmark2 . 1428905.5 |======================================================= OpenSSL 3.1 Algorithm: RSA4096 verify/s > Higher Is Better benchmark2 . 312713.0 |======================================================== System ZLIB Decompression 1.2.7 ms < Lower Is Better benchmark2 . 1703.51 |========================================================= PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better benchmark2 . 0.020 |=========================================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better benchmark2 . 0.577 |=========================================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better benchmark2 . 0.044 |=========================================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better benchmark2 . 0.076 |=========================================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better benchmark2 . 0.189 |=========================================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better benchmark2 . 45.50 |=========================================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better benchmark2 . 0.474 |=========================================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 800 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better benchmark2 . 0.738 |=========================================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better benchmark2 . 0.023 |=========================================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better benchmark2 . 99.32 |=========================================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 1000 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better benchmark2 . 0.895 |=========================================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better benchmark2 . 285.84 |========================================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better benchmark2 . 717.85 |========================================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 800 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better benchmark2 . 1374.16 |========================================================= PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better benchmark2 . 0.832 |=========================================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better benchmark2 . 0.051 |=========================================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better benchmark2 . 0.026 |=========================================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 1000 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better benchmark2 . 2009.10 |========================================================= PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better benchmark2 . 0.097 |=========================================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better benchmark2 . 0.225 |=========================================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better benchmark2 . 2.373 |=========================================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better benchmark2 . 0.538 |=========================================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 800 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better benchmark2 . 0.858 |=========================================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better benchmark2 . 0.994 |=========================================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better benchmark2 . 0.076 |=========================================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better benchmark2 . 0.074 |=========================================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better benchmark2 . 4.078 |=========================================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 1000 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better benchmark2 . 1.076 |=========================================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better benchmark2 . 9.233 |=========================================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better benchmark2 . 19.34 |=========================================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 800 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better benchmark2 . 32.87 |=========================================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better benchmark2 . 0.159 |=========================================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better benchmark2 . 0.364 |=========================================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better benchmark2 . 4.523 |=========================================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better benchmark2 . 0.721 |=========================================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 800 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better benchmark2 . 1.153 |=========================================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better benchmark2 . 1.031 |=========================================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better benchmark2 . 0.105 |=========================================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 1000 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better benchmark2 . 41.68 |=========================================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better benchmark2 . 7.445 |=========================================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 1000 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better benchmark2 . 1.456 |=========================================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better benchmark2 . 18.64 |=========================================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better benchmark2 . 48.01 |=========================================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 800 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better benchmark2 . 66.11 |=========================================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better benchmark2 . 0.233 |=========================================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better benchmark2 . 0.472 |=========================================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better benchmark2 . 5.286 |=========================================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better benchmark2 . 0.913 |=========================================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 800 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better benchmark2 . 1.465 |=========================================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 1000 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better benchmark2 . 76.29 |=========================================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better benchmark2 . 12.27 |=========================================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 1000 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better benchmark2 . 1.810 |=========================================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better benchmark2 . 30.87 |=========================================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better benchmark2 . 59.49 |=========================================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 800 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better benchmark2 . 87.63 |=========================================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 1000 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better benchmark2 . 108.94 |========================================================== OSBench Test: Memory Allocations Ns Per Event < Lower Is Better benchmark2 . 80.66 |=========================================================== SQLite 3.30.1 Threads / Copies: 1 Seconds < Lower Is Better benchmark2 . 14.04 |=========================================================== SQLite 3.30.1 Threads / Copies: 8 Seconds < Lower Is Better benchmark2 . 26.66 |=========================================================== SQLite 3.30.1 Threads / Copies: 32 Seconds < Lower Is Better benchmark2 . 56.75 |=========================================================== SQLite 3.30.1 Threads / Copies: 64 Seconds < Lower Is Better benchmark2 . 83.49 |=========================================================== SQLite 3.30.1 Threads / Copies: 128 Seconds < Lower Is Better benchmark2 . 123.36 |========================================================== Timed FFmpeg Compilation 6.1 Time To Compile Seconds < Lower Is Better benchmark2 . 26.41 |=========================================================== Timed Linux Kernel Compilation 6.1 Build: defconfig Seconds < Lower Is Better benchmark2 . 49.24 |=========================================================== Timed PHP Compilation 8.1.9 Time To Compile Seconds < Lower Is Better benchmark2 . 47.38 |=========================================================== Timed CPython Compilation 3.10.6 Build Configuration: Default Seconds < Lower Is Better benchmark2 . 17.30 |=========================================================== Parallel BZIP2 Compression 1.1.13 FreeBSD-13.0-RELEASE-amd64-memstick.img Compression Seconds < Lower Is Better benchmark2 . 3.597165 |======================================================== Gzip Compression Linux Source Tree Archiving To .tar.gz Seconds < Lower Is Better benchmark2 . 39.74 |=========================================================== XZ Compression 5.2.4 Compressing ubuntu-16.04.3-server-i386.img, Compression Level 9 Seconds < Lower Is Better benchmark2 . 23.46 |=========================================================== FLAC Audio Encoding 1.4 WAV To FLAC Seconds < Lower Is Better benchmark2 . 23.80 |=========================================================== Gcrypt Library 1.9 Seconds < Lower Is Better benchmark2 . 230.51 |========================================================== System GZIP Decompression Seconds < Lower Is Better benchmark2 . 3.251 |=========================================================== System XZ Decompression Seconds < Lower Is Better benchmark2 . 3.497 |=========================================================== RAR Compression 6.0.2 Linux Source Tree Archiving To RAR Seconds < Lower Is Better benchmark2 . 119.98 |========================================================== PHP Micro Benchmarks Test: Zend bench Seconds < Lower Is Better benchmark2 . 0.327 |=========================================================== PHP Micro Benchmarks Test: Zend micro_bench Seconds < Lower Is Better benchmark2 . 1.636 |=========================================================== OSBench Test: Create Files us Per Event < Lower Is Better benchmark2 . 16.19 |=========================================================== OSBench Test: Create Threads us Per Event < Lower Is Better benchmark2 . 24.24 |=========================================================== OSBench Test: Launch Programs us Per Event < Lower Is Better benchmark2 . 61.96 |=========================================================== OSBench Test: Create Processes us Per Event < Lower Is Better benchmark2 . 40.52 |===========================================================