1 AMD Ryzen 5 7600X 6-Core testing with a ASRock B650 PG Lightning (1.30.AS05 BIOS) and MSI AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT 16GB on EndeavourOS rolling via the Phoronix Test Suite. 6900XT First Run: Processor: AMD Ryzen 5 7600X 6-Core @ 5.45GHz (6 Cores / 12 Threads), Motherboard: ASRock B650 PG Lightning (1.30.AS05 BIOS), Chipset: AMD Device 14d8, Memory: 32GB, Disk: 2 x 1000GB PCIe SSD, Graphics: MSI AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT 16GB (2200/2800MHz), Audio: AMD Navi 21/23, Monitor: VG27A, Network: Realtek RTL8125 2.5GbE OS: EndeavourOS rolling, Kernel: 6.7.9-arch1-1 (x86_64), Desktop: KDE Plasma 6.0.2, Display Server: X Server 1.21.1.11, OpenGL: 4.6 Mesa 24.0.2-arch1.2 (LLVM 17.0.6 DRM 3.57), OpenCL: OpenCL 2.1 AMD-APP.dbg (3602.0), Compiler: GCC 13.2.1 20230801, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 2560x1440 SHOC Scalable HeterOgeneous Computing 2020-04-17 Target: OpenCL - Benchmark: Max SP Flops GFLOPS > Higher Is Better 6900XT First Run . 67300017 |================================================== LuxMark 3.1 OpenCL Device: GPU - Scene: Microphone Score > Higher Is Better 6900XT First Run . 56358 |===================================================== LuxMark 3.1 OpenCL Device: GPU - Scene: Hotel Score > Higher Is Better 6900XT First Run . 9648 |====================================================== LuxMark 3.1 OpenCL Device: CPU+GPU - Scene: Hotel Score > Higher Is Better 6900XT First Run . 9536 |====================================================== LuxMark 3.1 OpenCL Device: CPU+GPU - Scene: Microphone Score > Higher Is Better 6900XT First Run . 55844 |===================================================== LuxMark 3.1 OpenCL Device: CPU+GPU - Scene: Luxball HDR Score > Higher Is Better 6900XT First Run . 90302 |===================================================== LuxMark 3.1 OpenCL Device: GPU - Scene: Luxball HDR Score > Higher Is Better 6900XT First Run . 90896 |===================================================== FluidX3D 2.9 Test: FP32-FP32 MLUPs/s > Higher Is Better 6900XT First Run . 2008 |====================================================== SHOC Scalable HeterOgeneous Computing 2020-04-17 Target: OpenCL - Benchmark: S3D GFLOPS > Higher Is Better 6900XT First Run . 308.20 |==================================================== FluidX3D 2.9 Test: FP32-FP16C MLUPs/s > Higher Is Better 6900XT First Run . 4214 |====================================================== FluidX3D 2.9 Test: FP32-FP16S MLUPs/s > Higher Is Better 6900XT First Run . 4231 |====================================================== SmallPT GPU 1.6pts1 OpenCL Device: GPU - Resolution: 2560 x 1440 - Scene: Caustic Samples/sec > Higher Is Better 6900XT First Run . 1710392302 |================================================ SmallPT GPU 1.6pts1 OpenCL Device: GPU - Resolution: 2560 x 1440 - Scene: Caustic3 Samples/sec > Higher Is Better 6900XT First Run . 1710392573 |================================================ SmallPT GPU 1.6pts1 OpenCL Device: GPU - Resolution: 2560 x 1440 - Scene: Cornell Samples/sec > Higher Is Better 6900XT First Run . 1710392437 |================================================ clpeak 1.1.2 OpenCL Test: Transfer Bandwidth enqueueWriteBuffer GBPS > Higher Is Better 6900XT First Run . 21.99 |===================================================== clpeak 1.1.2 OpenCL Test: Transfer Bandwidth enqueueReadBuffer GBPS > Higher Is Better 6900XT First Run . 5.30 |====================================================== ViennaCL 1.7.1 Test: CPU BLAS - dGEMM-TT GFLOPs/s > Higher Is Better 6900XT First Run . 38.9 |====================================================== ViennaCL 1.7.1 Test: CPU BLAS - dGEMM-TN GFLOPs/s > Higher Is Better 6900XT First Run . 40.5 |====================================================== ViennaCL 1.7.1 Test: CPU BLAS - dGEMM-NT GFLOPs/s > Higher Is Better 6900XT First Run . 35.8 |====================================================== ViennaCL 1.7.1 Test: CPU BLAS - dGEMM-NN GFLOPs/s > Higher Is Better 6900XT First Run . 37.7 |====================================================== ViennaCL 1.7.1 Test: CPU BLAS - dGEMV-T GB/s > Higher Is Better 6900XT First Run . 70.8 |====================================================== ViennaCL 1.7.1 Test: CPU BLAS - dGEMV-N GB/s > Higher Is Better 6900XT First Run . 72.1 |====================================================== ViennaCL 1.7.1 Test: CPU BLAS - dDOT GB/s > Higher Is Better 6900XT First Run . 66.7 |====================================================== ViennaCL 1.7.1 Test: CPU BLAS - dAXPY GB/s > Higher Is Better 6900XT First Run . 70.2 |====================================================== ViennaCL 1.7.1 Test: CPU BLAS - dCOPY GB/s > Higher Is Better 6900XT First Run . 46.6 |====================================================== ViennaCL 1.7.1 Test: CPU BLAS - sDOT GB/s > Higher Is Better 6900XT First Run . 83.7 |====================================================== ViennaCL 1.7.1 Test: CPU BLAS - sAXPY GB/s > Higher Is Better 6900XT First Run . 89.4 |====================================================== ViennaCL 1.7.1 Test: CPU BLAS - sCOPY GB/s > Higher Is Better 6900XT First Run . 59.6 |====================================================== ViennaCL 1.7.1 Test: OpenCL BLAS - dGEMM-TT GFLOPs/s > Higher Is Better 6900XT First Run . 1340 |====================================================== ViennaCL 1.7.1 Test: OpenCL BLAS - dGEMM-TN GFLOPs/s > Higher Is Better 6900XT First Run . 1290 |====================================================== ViennaCL 1.7.1 Test: OpenCL BLAS - dGEMM-NT GFLOPs/s > Higher Is Better 6900XT First Run . 1350 |====================================================== ViennaCL 1.7.1 Test: OpenCL BLAS - dGEMM-NN GFLOPs/s > Higher Is Better 6900XT First Run . 1320 |====================================================== ViennaCL 1.7.1 Test: OpenCL BLAS - dGEMV-T GB/s > Higher Is Better 6900XT First Run . 516 |======================================================= ViennaCL 1.7.1 Test: OpenCL BLAS - dGEMV-N GB/s > Higher Is Better 6900XT First Run . 163 |======================================================= ViennaCL 1.7.1 Test: OpenCL BLAS - dDOT GB/s > Higher Is Better 6900XT First Run . 571 |======================================================= ViennaCL 1.7.1 Test: OpenCL BLAS - dAXPY GB/s > Higher Is Better 6900XT First Run . 640 |======================================================= ViennaCL 1.7.1 Test: OpenCL BLAS - dCOPY GB/s > Higher Is Better 6900XT First Run . 436 |======================================================= ViennaCL 1.7.1 Test: OpenCL BLAS - sDOT GB/s > Higher Is Better 6900XT First Run . 578 |======================================================= ViennaCL 1.7.1 Test: OpenCL BLAS - sAXPY GB/s > Higher Is Better 6900XT First Run . 821 |======================================================= ViennaCL 1.7.1 Test: OpenCL BLAS - sCOPY GB/s > Higher Is Better 6900XT First Run . 572 |======================================================= Lulesh OpenCL 2017-07-06 z/s > Higher Is Better 6900XT First Run . 4447.16 |=================================================== Darktable 4.6.1 Test: Boat - Acceleration: OpenCL Seconds < Lower Is Better 6900XT First Run . 1.423 |===================================================== Xsbench OpenCL 2017-07-06 Lookups/s > Higher Is Better Rodinia 3.1 Test: OpenCL Myocyte Seconds < Lower Is Better 6900XT First Run . 5.424 |===================================================== clpeak 1.1.2 OpenCL Test: Kernel Latency us < Lower Is Better 6900XT First Run . 9.11 |====================================================== clpeak 1.1.2 OpenCL Test: Global Memory Bandwidth GBPS > Higher Is Better 6900XT First Run . 422.73 |==================================================== SHOC Scalable HeterOgeneous Computing 2020-04-17 Target: OpenCL - Benchmark: Texture Read Bandwidth GB/s > Higher Is Better 6900XT First Run . 1135.80 |=================================================== clpeak 1.1.2 OpenCL Test: Double-Precision Compute GFLOPS > Higher Is Better 6900XT First Run . 1580.95 |=================================================== cl-mem 2017-01-13 Benchmark: Read GB/s > Higher Is Better 6900XT First Run . 471.4 |===================================================== cl-mem 2017-01-13 Benchmark: Copy GB/s > Higher Is Better 6900XT First Run . 367.3 |===================================================== cl-mem 2017-01-13 Benchmark: Write GB/s > Higher Is Better 6900XT First Run . 416.5 |===================================================== clpeak 1.1.2 OpenCL Test: Integer Compute GIOPS > Higher Is Better 6900XT First Run . 4856.17 |=================================================== Darktable 4.6.1 Test: Masskrug - Acceleration: OpenCL Seconds < Lower Is Better 6900XT First Run . 1.756 |===================================================== clpeak 1.1.2 OpenCL Test: Single-Precision Compute GFLOPS > Higher Is Better 6900XT First Run . 24650.53 |================================================== SHOC Scalable HeterOgeneous Computing 2020-04-17 Target: OpenCL - Benchmark: GEMM SGEMM_N GFLOPS > Higher Is Better 6900XT First Run . 8720.47 |=================================================== Rodinia 3.1 Test: OpenCL Leukocyte Seconds < Lower Is Better 6900XT First Run . 2.306 |===================================================== clpeak 1.1.2 OpenCL Test: Integer 24-bit Compute GIOPS > Higher Is Better 6900XT First Run . 23607.58 |================================================== Darktable 4.6.1 Test: Server Room - Acceleration: OpenCL Seconds < Lower Is Better 6900XT First Run . 0.610 |===================================================== SHOC Scalable HeterOgeneous Computing 2020-04-17 Target: OpenCL - Benchmark: Triad GB/s > Higher Is Better 6900XT First Run . 25.00 |===================================================== Rodinia 3.1 Test: OpenCL Heartwall Seconds < Lower Is Better SHOC Scalable HeterOgeneous Computing 2020-04-17 Target: OpenCL - Benchmark: FFT SP GFLOPS > Higher Is Better 6900XT First Run . 1697.07 |=================================================== Darktable 4.6.1 Test: Server Rack - Acceleration: OpenCL Seconds < Lower Is Better 6900XT First Run . 0.056 |===================================================== SHOC Scalable HeterOgeneous Computing 2020-04-17 Target: OpenCL - Benchmark: Reduction GB/s > Higher Is Better 6900XT First Run . 645.29 |==================================================== SHOC Scalable HeterOgeneous Computing 2020-04-17 Target: OpenCL - Benchmark: MD5 Hash GHash/s > Higher Is Better 6900XT First Run . 32.14 |===================================================== SHOC Scalable HeterOgeneous Computing 2020-04-17 Target: OpenCL - Benchmark: Bus Speed Readback GB/s > Higher Is Better 6900XT First Run . 28.42 |===================================================== SHOC Scalable HeterOgeneous Computing 2020-04-17 Target: OpenCL - Benchmark: Bus Speed Download GB/s > Higher Is Better 6900XT First Run . 28.76 |===================================================== LuxMark 3.1 OpenCL Device: CPU - Scene: Hotel Score > Higher Is Better Rodinia 3.1 Test: OpenCL LavaMD Seconds < Lower Is Better LuxMark 3.1 OpenCL Device: CPU - Scene: Microphone Score > Higher Is Better Rodinia 3.1 Test: OpenCL Particle Filter Seconds < Lower Is Better LuxMark 3.1 OpenCL Device: CPU - Scene: Luxball HDR Score > Higher Is Better LuxMark 3.1 OpenCL Device: Hybrid GPU - Scene: Luxball HDR Score > Higher Is Better LuxMark 3.1 OpenCL Device: Hybrid GPU - Scene: Microphone Score > Higher Is Better LuxMark 3.1 OpenCL Device: Hybrid GPU - Scene: Hotel Score > Higher Is Better Parboil 2.5 Test: OpenCL MRI Gridding Seconds < Lower Is Better Parboil 2.5 Test: OpenCL TPACF Seconds < Lower Is Better Parboil 2.5 Test: OpenCL Histo Seconds < Lower Is Better Parboil 2.5 Test: OpenCL LBM Seconds < Lower Is Better Parboil 2.5 Test: OpenCL BFS Seconds < Lower Is Better MandelGPU 1.3pts1 OpenCL Device: GPU - Resolution: $VIDEO_WIDTH x $VIDEO_HEIGHT Samples/sec > Higher Is Better JuliaGPU 1.2pts1 OpenCL Device: GPU - Resolution: $VIDEO_WIDTH x $VIDEO_HEIGHT Samples/sec > Higher Is Better OpenDwarfs 2013-11-06 Test: Cyclic Redundancy Check ms < Lower Is Better OpenDwarfs 2013-11-06 Test: Compressed Sparse Row ms < Lower Is Better OpenDwarfs 2013-11-06 Test: LU Decomposition ms < Lower Is Better MandelbulbGPU 1.0pts1 OpenCL Device: GPU - Resolution: $VIDEO_WIDTH x $VIDEO_HEIGHT Samples/sec > Higher Is Better