opencl2
Intel Core i7-9850H testing with a HP 860F (R92 Ver. 01.26.00 BIOS) and NVIDIA Quadro T2000 4GB on ManjaroLinux 23.1.3 via the Phoronix Test Suite.


NVIDIA Quadro T2000 - Intel Core i7-9850H: 

	Processor: Intel Core i7-9850H @ 2.60GHz (6 Cores / 12 Threads), Motherboard: HP 860F (R92 Ver. 01.26.00 BIOS), Chipset: Intel Cannon Lake PCH, Memory: 32GB, Disk: 512GB Kioxia KXG60ZNV512G + 4001GB Samsung SSD 870, Graphics: NVIDIA Quadro T2000 4GB, Audio: Intel Cannon Lake PCH cAVS, Network: Intel I219-LM + Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200

	OS: ManjaroLinux 23.1.3, Kernel: 6.7.9-lqx1-1-lqx (x86_64), Desktop: KDE Plasma 5.27.10, Display Server: X Server 1.21.1.11, Display Driver: NVIDIA 550.54.14, OpenGL: 4.6.0, OpenCL: OpenCL 3.0 + OpenCL 3.0 CUDA 12.4.89, Compiler: GCC 13.2.1 20230801 + Clang 16.0.6 + LLVM 16.0.6 + CUDA 12.3, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 1920x1080


SHOC Scalable HeterOgeneous Computing 2020-04-17
Target: OpenCL - Benchmark: S3D


SHOC Scalable HeterOgeneous Computing 2020-04-17
Target: OpenCL - Benchmark: Triad


SHOC Scalable HeterOgeneous Computing 2020-04-17
Target: OpenCL - Benchmark: FFT SP


SHOC Scalable HeterOgeneous Computing 2020-04-17
Target: OpenCL - Benchmark: MD5 Hash


SHOC Scalable HeterOgeneous Computing 2020-04-17
Target: OpenCL - Benchmark: Reduction


SHOC Scalable HeterOgeneous Computing 2020-04-17
Target: OpenCL - Benchmark: GEMM SGEMM_N


SHOC Scalable HeterOgeneous Computing 2020-04-17
Target: OpenCL - Benchmark: Max SP Flops


SHOC Scalable HeterOgeneous Computing 2020-04-17
Target: OpenCL - Benchmark: Bus Speed Download


SHOC Scalable HeterOgeneous Computing 2020-04-17
Target: OpenCL - Benchmark: Bus Speed Readback


SHOC Scalable HeterOgeneous Computing 2020-04-17
Target: OpenCL - Benchmark: Texture Read Bandwidth


cl-mem 2017-01-13
Benchmark: Copy
GB/s > Higher Is Better
NVIDIA Quadro T2000 - Intel Core i7-9850H . 27.2 |=============================


cl-mem 2017-01-13
Benchmark: Read
GB/s > Higher Is Better
NVIDIA Quadro T2000 - Intel Core i7-9850H . 27.9 |=============================


cl-mem 2017-01-13
Benchmark: Write
GB/s > Higher Is Better
NVIDIA Quadro T2000 - Intel Core i7-9850H . 27.1 |=============================


FluidX3D 2.9
Test: FP32-FP32
MLUPs/s > Higher Is Better
NVIDIA Quadro T2000 - Intel Core i7-9850H . 702 |==============================


FluidX3D 2.9
Test: FP32-FP16C
MLUPs/s > Higher Is Better
NVIDIA Quadro T2000 - Intel Core i7-9850H . 1408 |=============================


FluidX3D 2.9
Test: FP32-FP16S
MLUPs/s > Higher Is Better
NVIDIA Quadro T2000 - Intel Core i7-9850H . 1278 |=============================


clpeak 1.1.2
OpenCL Test: Kernel Latency
us < Lower Is Better
NVIDIA Quadro T2000 - Intel Core i7-9850H . 29.48 |============================


clpeak 1.1.2
OpenCL Test: Integer Compute
GIOPS > Higher Is Better
NVIDIA Quadro T2000 - Intel Core i7-9850H . 145.50 |===========================


clpeak 1.1.2
OpenCL Test: Integer 24-bit Compute
GIOPS > Higher Is Better
NVIDIA Quadro T2000 - Intel Core i7-9850H . 145.35 |===========================


clpeak 1.1.2
OpenCL Test: Global Memory Bandwidth
GBPS > Higher Is Better
NVIDIA Quadro T2000 - Intel Core i7-9850H . 32.08 |============================


clpeak 1.1.2
OpenCL Test: Double-Precision Compute
GFLOPS > Higher Is Better
NVIDIA Quadro T2000 - Intel Core i7-9850H . 109.45 |===========================


clpeak 1.1.2
OpenCL Test: Single-Precision Compute
GFLOPS > Higher Is Better
NVIDIA Quadro T2000 - Intel Core i7-9850H . 435.58 |===========================


clpeak 1.1.2
OpenCL Test: Transfer Bandwidth enqueueReadBuffer
GBPS > Higher Is Better
NVIDIA Quadro T2000 - Intel Core i7-9850H . 17.10 |============================


clpeak 1.1.2
OpenCL Test: Transfer Bandwidth enqueueWriteBuffer
GBPS > Higher Is Better
NVIDIA Quadro T2000 - Intel Core i7-9850H . 16.51 |============================


Parboil 2.5
Test: OpenCL BFS
Seconds < Lower Is Better
NVIDIA Quadro T2000 - Intel Core i7-9850H . 1.119727 |=========================


Parboil 2.5
Test: OpenCL LBM
Seconds < Lower Is Better
NVIDIA Quadro T2000 - Intel Core i7-9850H . 75.06 |============================


Parboil 2.5
Test: OpenCL Histo
Seconds < Lower Is Better
NVIDIA Quadro T2000 - Intel Core i7-9850H . 77.05 |============================


Parboil 2.5
Test: OpenCL TPACF
Seconds < Lower Is Better
NVIDIA Quadro T2000 - Intel Core i7-9850H . 9.650356 |=========================


Parboil 2.5
Test: OpenCL MRI Gridding
Seconds < Lower Is Better


Rodinia 3.1
Test: OpenCL LavaMD
Seconds < Lower Is Better


Rodinia 3.1
Test: OpenCL Myocyte
Seconds < Lower Is Better
NVIDIA Quadro T2000 - Intel Core i7-9850H . 78.22 |============================


Rodinia 3.1
Test: OpenCL Heartwall
Seconds < Lower Is Better
NVIDIA Quadro T2000 - Intel Core i7-9850H . 8.978 |============================


Rodinia 3.1
Test: OpenCL Leukocyte
Seconds < Lower Is Better
NVIDIA Quadro T2000 - Intel Core i7-9850H . 23.68 |============================


Rodinia 3.1
Test: OpenCL Particle Filter
Seconds < Lower Is Better
NVIDIA Quadro T2000 - Intel Core i7-9850H . 76.83 |============================


ViennaCL 1.7.1
Test: CPU BLAS - sCOPY
GB/s > Higher Is Better
NVIDIA Quadro T2000 - Intel Core i7-9850H . 21.5 |=============================


ViennaCL 1.7.1
Test: CPU BLAS - sAXPY
GB/s > Higher Is Better
NVIDIA Quadro T2000 - Intel Core i7-9850H . 32.9 |=============================


ViennaCL 1.7.1
Test: CPU BLAS - sDOT
GB/s > Higher Is Better
NVIDIA Quadro T2000 - Intel Core i7-9850H . 35.2 |=============================


ViennaCL 1.7.1
Test: CPU BLAS - dCOPY
GB/s > Higher Is Better
NVIDIA Quadro T2000 - Intel Core i7-9850H . 20.6 |=============================


ViennaCL 1.7.1
Test: CPU BLAS - dAXPY
GB/s > Higher Is Better
NVIDIA Quadro T2000 - Intel Core i7-9850H . 31.1 |=============================


ViennaCL 1.7.1
Test: CPU BLAS - dDOT
GB/s > Higher Is Better
NVIDIA Quadro T2000 - Intel Core i7-9850H . 33.3 |=============================


ViennaCL 1.7.1
Test: CPU BLAS - dGEMV-N
GB/s > Higher Is Better
NVIDIA Quadro T2000 - Intel Core i7-9850H . 35.6 |=============================


ViennaCL 1.7.1
Test: CPU BLAS - dGEMV-T
GB/s > Higher Is Better
NVIDIA Quadro T2000 - Intel Core i7-9850H . 35.3 |=============================


ViennaCL 1.7.1
Test: CPU BLAS - dGEMM-NN
GFLOPs/s > Higher Is Better
NVIDIA Quadro T2000 - Intel Core i7-9850H . 21.5 |=============================


ViennaCL 1.7.1
Test: CPU BLAS - dGEMM-NT
GFLOPs/s > Higher Is Better
NVIDIA Quadro T2000 - Intel Core i7-9850H . 22.5 |=============================


ViennaCL 1.7.1
Test: CPU BLAS - dGEMM-TN
GFLOPs/s > Higher Is Better
NVIDIA Quadro T2000 - Intel Core i7-9850H . 23.0 |=============================


ViennaCL 1.7.1
Test: CPU BLAS - dGEMM-TT
GFLOPs/s > Higher Is Better
NVIDIA Quadro T2000 - Intel Core i7-9850H . 23.2 |=============================


ViennaCL 1.7.1
Test: OpenCL BLAS - sCOPY
GB/s > Higher Is Better
NVIDIA Quadro T2000 - Intel Core i7-9850H . 28.3 |=============================


ViennaCL 1.7.1
Test: OpenCL BLAS - sAXPY
GB/s > Higher Is Better
NVIDIA Quadro T2000 - Intel Core i7-9850H . 27.0 |=============================


ViennaCL 1.7.1
Test: OpenCL BLAS - sDOT
GB/s > Higher Is Better
NVIDIA Quadro T2000 - Intel Core i7-9850H . 28.6 |=============================


ViennaCL 1.7.1
Test: OpenCL BLAS - dCOPY
GB/s > Higher Is Better
NVIDIA Quadro T2000 - Intel Core i7-9850H . 28.4 |=============================


ViennaCL 1.7.1
Test: OpenCL BLAS - dAXPY
GB/s > Higher Is Better
NVIDIA Quadro T2000 - Intel Core i7-9850H . 29.1 |=============================


ViennaCL 1.7.1
Test: OpenCL BLAS - dDOT
GB/s > Higher Is Better
NVIDIA Quadro T2000 - Intel Core i7-9850H . 30.1 |=============================


ViennaCL 1.7.1
Test: OpenCL BLAS - dGEMV-N
GB/s > Higher Is Better
NVIDIA Quadro T2000 - Intel Core i7-9850H . 31.1 |=============================


ViennaCL 1.7.1
Test: OpenCL BLAS - dGEMV-T
GB/s > Higher Is Better
NVIDIA Quadro T2000 - Intel Core i7-9850H . 28.9 |=============================


ViennaCL 1.7.1
Test: OpenCL BLAS - dGEMM-NN
GFLOPs/s > Higher Is Better
NVIDIA Quadro T2000 - Intel Core i7-9850H . 43.3 |=============================


ViennaCL 1.7.1
Test: OpenCL BLAS - dGEMM-NT
GFLOPs/s > Higher Is Better
NVIDIA Quadro T2000 - Intel Core i7-9850H . 40.8 |=============================


ViennaCL 1.7.1
Test: OpenCL BLAS - dGEMM-TN
GFLOPs/s > Higher Is Better
NVIDIA Quadro T2000 - Intel Core i7-9850H . 42.4 |=============================


ViennaCL 1.7.1
Test: OpenCL BLAS - dGEMM-TT
GFLOPs/s > Higher Is Better
NVIDIA Quadro T2000 - Intel Core i7-9850H . 42.1 |=============================


Darktable
Test: Boat - Acceleration: OpenCL
Seconds < Lower Is Better


Darktable
Test: Masskrug - Acceleration: OpenCL
Seconds < Lower Is Better


Darktable
Test: Server Rack - Acceleration: OpenCL
Seconds < Lower Is Better


Darktable
Test: Server Room - Acceleration: OpenCL
Seconds < Lower Is Better


Xsbench OpenCL 2017-07-06

Lookups/s > Higher Is Better


JuliaGPU 1.2pts1
OpenCL Device: GPU - Resolution: $VIDEO_WIDTH x $VIDEO_HEIGHT
Samples/sec > Higher Is Better


MandelbulbGPU 1.0pts1
OpenCL Device: GPU - Resolution: $VIDEO_WIDTH x $VIDEO_HEIGHT
Samples/sec > Higher Is Better


MandelGPU 1.3pts1
OpenCL Device: GPU - Resolution: $VIDEO_WIDTH x $VIDEO_HEIGHT
Samples/sec > Higher Is Better


SmallPT GPU 1.6pts1
OpenCL Device: GPU - Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Scene: Caustic
Samples/sec > Higher Is Better
NVIDIA Quadro T2000 - Intel Core i7-9850H . 1710163090 |=======================


SmallPT GPU 1.6pts1
OpenCL Device: GPU - Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Scene: Cornell
Samples/sec > Higher Is Better
NVIDIA Quadro T2000 - Intel Core i7-9850H . 1710163213 |=======================


SmallPT GPU 1.6pts1
OpenCL Device: GPU - Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Scene: Caustic3
Samples/sec > Higher Is Better
NVIDIA Quadro T2000 - Intel Core i7-9850H . 1710163340 |=======================


LuxMark 3.1
OpenCL Device: CPU - Scene: Hotel
Score > Higher Is Better


LuxMark 3.1
OpenCL Device: GPU - Scene: Hotel
Score > Higher Is Better
NVIDIA Quadro T2000 - Intel Core i7-9850H . 3028 |=============================


LuxMark 3.1
OpenCL Device: CPU+GPU - Scene: Hotel
Score > Higher Is Better
NVIDIA Quadro T2000 - Intel Core i7-9850H . 3020 |=============================


LuxMark 3.1
OpenCL Device: CPU - Scene: Microphone
Score > Higher Is Better


LuxMark 3.1
OpenCL Device: GPU - Scene: Microphone
Score > Higher Is Better
NVIDIA Quadro T2000 - Intel Core i7-9850H . 8135 |=============================


LuxMark 3.1
OpenCL Device: CPU - Scene: Luxball HDR
Score > Higher Is Better


LuxMark 3.1
OpenCL Device: GPU - Scene: Luxball HDR
Score > Higher Is Better
NVIDIA Quadro T2000 - Intel Core i7-9850H . 12518 |============================


LuxMark 3.1
OpenCL Device: Hybrid GPU - Scene: Hotel
Score > Higher Is Better


LuxMark 3.1
OpenCL Device: CPU+GPU - Scene: Microphone
Score > Higher Is Better
NVIDIA Quadro T2000 - Intel Core i7-9850H . 8116 |=============================


LuxMark 3.1
OpenCL Device: CPU+GPU - Scene: Luxball HDR
Score > Higher Is Better
NVIDIA Quadro T2000 - Intel Core i7-9850H . 12521 |============================


LuxMark 3.1
OpenCL Device: Hybrid GPU - Scene: Microphone
Score > Higher Is Better


LuxMark 3.1
OpenCL Device: Hybrid GPU - Scene: Luxball HDR
Score > Higher Is Better


OpenDwarfs 2013-11-06
Test: LU Decomposition
ms < Lower Is Better


OpenDwarfs 2013-11-06
Test: Compressed Sparse Row
ms < Lower Is Better


OpenDwarfs 2013-11-06
Test: Cyclic Redundancy Check
ms < Lower Is Better


Lulesh OpenCL 2017-07-06

z/s > Higher Is Better
NVIDIA Quadro T2000 - Intel Core i7-9850H . 1412.51 |==========================