gpuowl cs2 vkfft
AMD Ryzen 9 7950X 16-Core testing with a ASUS ROG STRIX X670E-E GAMING WIFI (1416 BIOS) and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 10GB on Ubuntu 23.10 via the Phoronix Test Suite.


a: 

	Processor: AMD Ryzen 9 7950X 16-Core @ 5.88GHz (16 Cores / 32 Threads), Motherboard: ASUS ROG STRIX X670E-E GAMING WIFI (1416 BIOS), Chipset: AMD Device 14d8, Memory: 2 x 16GB DRAM-6000MT/s G Skill F5-6000J3038F16G, Disk: 2000GB Samsung SSD 980 PRO 2TB + 4001GB Western Digital WD_BLACK SN850X 4000GB, Graphics: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 10GB, Audio: NVIDIA GA102 HD Audio, Monitor: DELL U2723QE, Network: Intel I225-V + Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX210/AX211/AX411

	OS: Ubuntu 23.10, Kernel: 6.7.0-060700-generic (x86_64), Desktop: GNOME Shell 45.2, Display Server: X Server 1.21.1.7, Display Driver: NVIDIA 550.40.07, OpenGL: 4.6.0, OpenCL: OpenCL 3.0 CUDA 12.4.74, Compiler: GCC 13.2.0, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 3840x2160

b: 

	Processor: AMD Ryzen 9 7950X 16-Core @ 5.88GHz (16 Cores / 32 Threads), Motherboard: ASUS ROG STRIX X670E-E GAMING WIFI (1416 BIOS), Chipset: AMD Device 14d8, Memory: 2 x 16GB DRAM-6000MT/s G Skill F5-6000J3038F16G, Disk: 2000GB Samsung SSD 980 PRO 2TB + 4001GB Western Digital WD_BLACK SN850X 4000GB, Graphics: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 10GB, Audio: NVIDIA GA102 HD Audio, Monitor: DELL U2723QE, Network: Intel I225-V + Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX210/AX211/AX411

	OS: Ubuntu 23.10, Kernel: 6.7.0-060700-generic (x86_64), Desktop: GNOME Shell 45.2, Display Server: X Server 1.21.1.7, Display Driver: NVIDIA 550.40.07, OpenGL: 4.6.0, OpenCL: OpenCL 3.0 CUDA 12.4.74, Compiler: GCC 13.2.0, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 3840x2160

c: 

	Processor: AMD Ryzen 9 7950X 16-Core @ 5.88GHz (16 Cores / 32 Threads), Motherboard: ASUS ROG STRIX X670E-E GAMING WIFI (1416 BIOS), Chipset: AMD Device 14d8, Memory: 2 x 16GB DRAM-6000MT/s G Skill F5-6000J3038F16G, Disk: 2000GB Samsung SSD 980 PRO 2TB + 4001GB Western Digital WD_BLACK SN850X 4000GB, Graphics: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 10GB, Audio: NVIDIA GA102 HD Audio, Monitor: DELL U2723QE, Network: Intel I225-V + Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX210/AX211/AX411

	OS: Ubuntu 23.10, Kernel: 6.7.0-060700-generic (x86_64), Desktop: GNOME Shell 45.2, Display Server: X Server 1.21.1.7, Display Driver: NVIDIA 550.40.07, OpenGL: 4.6.0, OpenCL: OpenCL 3.0 CUDA 12.4.74, Compiler: GCC 13.2.0, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 3840x2160


VkFFT 1.3.4
Test: FFT + iFFT R2C / C2R
Benchmark Score > Higher Is Better
a . 51046 |====================================================================
b . 50803 |====================================================================
c . 49951 |===================================================================


VkFFT 1.3.4
Test: FFT + iFFT C2C 1D batched in half precision
Benchmark Score > Higher Is Better
a . 148147 |===================================================================
b . 143220 |=================================================================
c . 145097 |==================================================================


VkFFT 1.3.4
Test: FFT + iFFT C2C Bluestein in single precision
Benchmark Score > Higher Is Better
a . 13286 |====================================================================
b . 13225 |===================================================================
c . 13358 |====================================================================


VkFFT 1.3.4
Test: FFT + iFFT C2C 1D batched in double precision
Benchmark Score > Higher Is Better
a . 25136 |===================================================================
b . 23693 |===============================================================
c . 25627 |====================================================================


VkFFT 1.3.4
Test: FFT + iFFT C2C 1D batched in single precision
Benchmark Score > Higher Is Better
a . 113874 |===================================================================
b . 113952 |===================================================================
c . 113935 |===================================================================


VkFFT 1.3.4
Test: FFT + iFFT C2C multidimensional in single precision
Benchmark Score > Higher Is Better
a . 46283 |=================================================================
b . 47650 |===================================================================
c . 48385 |====================================================================


VkFFT 1.3.4
Test: FFT + iFFT C2C Bluestein benchmark in double precision
Benchmark Score > Higher Is Better
a . 3724 |====================================================================
b . 3763 |=====================================================================
c . 3758 |=====================================================================


VkFFT 1.3.4
Test: FFT + iFFT C2C 1D batched in single precision, no reshuffling
Benchmark Score > Higher Is Better
a . 116216 |===================================================================
b . 116227 |===================================================================
c . 116319 |===================================================================


Counter-Strike 2
Resolution: 1920 x 1080
Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better
a . 308.0 |===================================================================
b . 311.4 |====================================================================
c . 309.8 |====================================================================


Counter-Strike 2
Resolution: 1920 x 1200
Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better
a . 291.7 |====================================================================
b . 292.7 |====================================================================
c . 293.7 |====================================================================


Counter-Strike 2
Resolution: 2560 x 1440
Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better
a . 221.9 |====================================================================
b . 221.3 |====================================================================
c . 221.1 |====================================================================


Counter-Strike 2
Resolution: 3840 x 2160
Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better
a . 121.4 |===================================================================
b . 121.6 |===================================================================
c . 122.8 |====================================================================


ProjectPhysX OpenCL-Benchmark 1.2
Operation: Memory Bandwidth Coalesced Read
GB/s > Higher Is Better
a . 702.72 |===================================================================
b . 702.78 |===================================================================
c . 702.84 |===================================================================


ProjectPhysX OpenCL-Benchmark 1.2
Operation: Memory Bandwidth Coalesced Write
GB/s > Higher Is Better
a . 721.83 |===================================================================
b . 721.79 |===================================================================
c . 721.72 |===================================================================


GpuOwl 7.5
Exponent: 57885161
Iterations / Second > Higher Is Better
a . 723.24 |==================================================================
b . 729.39 |===================================================================
c . 728.86 |===================================================================


GpuOwl 7.5
Exponent: 77936867
Iterations / Second > Higher Is Better
a . 532.10 |==================================================================
b . 536.19 |===================================================================
c . 532.20 |===================================================================


GpuOwl 7.5
Exponent: 332220523
Iterations / Second > Higher Is Better
a . 115.73 |==================================================================
b . 116.65 |===================================================================
c . 115.78 |===================================================================


ProjectPhysX OpenCL-Benchmark 1.2
Operation: FP64 Compute
TFLOPs/s > Higher Is Better
a . 0.528 |====================================================================
b . 0.531 |====================================================================
c . 0.527 |===================================================================


ProjectPhysX OpenCL-Benchmark 1.2
Operation: FP32 Compute
TFLOPs/s > Higher Is Better
a . 32.87 |====================================================================
b . 32.92 |====================================================================
c . 32.80 |====================================================================


ProjectPhysX OpenCL-Benchmark 1.2
Operation: INT64 Compute
TIOPs/s > Higher Is Better
a . 3.231 |====================================================================
b . 3.222 |====================================================================
c . 3.225 |====================================================================


ProjectPhysX OpenCL-Benchmark 1.2
Operation: INT32 Compute
TIOPs/s > Higher Is Better
a . 16.86 |====================================================================
b . 16.67 |===================================================================
c . 16.92 |====================================================================


ProjectPhysX OpenCL-Benchmark 1.2
Operation: INT16 Compute
TIOPs/s > Higher Is Better
a . 14.57 |====================================================================
b . 14.56 |====================================================================
c . 14.56 |====================================================================


ProjectPhysX OpenCL-Benchmark 1.2
Operation: INT8 Compute
TIOPs/s > Higher Is Better
a . 12.11 |====================================================================
b . 12.08 |===================================================================
c . 12.17 |====================================================================