nuc1 Intel Core i5-13500H testing with a Simply NUC NUC13OXi5B (1.08 BIOS) and Intel RPL-P 31GB on Ubuntu 22.04 via the Phoronix Test Suite. run1: Processor: Intel Core i5-13500H @ 4.70GHz (12 Cores / 16 Threads), Motherboard: Simply NUC NUC13OXi5B (1.08 BIOS), Chipset: Intel Alder Lake PCH, Memory: 2 x 16 GB DDR5-5200MT/s Kingston, Disk: 1024GB KINGSTON OM8PGP41024Q-A0, Graphics: Intel RPL-P 31GB (1450MHz), Audio: Realtek ALC269VB, Monitor: DELL ST2421L, Network: Intel Device 125c + Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX210/AX211/AX411 OS: Ubuntu 22.04, Kernel: 6.5.0-18-generic (x86_64), Desktop: KDE Plasma 5.24.7, Display Server: X Server 1.21.1.4, OpenGL: 4.6 Mesa 23.0.4-0ubuntu1~22.04.1, Vulkan: 1.3.238, Compiler: GCC 11.4.0, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 1920x1080 Algebraic Multi-Grid Benchmark 1.2 Figure Of Merit > Higher Is Better run1 . 216181807 |============================================================= simdjson 2.0 Throughput Test: PartialTweets GB/s > Higher Is Better run1 . 4.35 |================================================================== simdjson 2.0 Throughput Test: LargeRandom GB/s > Higher Is Better run1 . 1.26 |================================================================== simdjson 2.0 Throughput Test: Kostya GB/s > Higher Is Better run1 . 3.69 |================================================================== simdjson 2.0 Throughput Test: DistinctUserID GB/s > Higher Is Better run1 . 5.18 |================================================================== simdjson 2.0 Throughput Test: TopTweet GB/s > Higher Is Better run1 . 5.11 |================================================================== ACES DGEMM 1.0 Sustained Floating-Point Rate GFLOP/s > Higher Is Better run1 . 3.000488 |============================================================== ArrayFire 3.9 Test: BLAS CPU GFLOPS > Higher Is Better run1 . 33.99 |================================================================= HPC Challenge 1.5.0 Test / Class: G-HPL GFLOPS > Higher Is Better run1 . 44.65 |================================================================= Cryptsetup PBKDF2-sha512 Iterations Per Second > Higher Is Better run1 . 1885932 |=============================================================== Cryptsetup PBKDF2-whirlpool Iterations Per Second > Higher Is Better run1 . 878204 |================================================================ C-Blosc 2.11 Test: blosclz shuffle - Buffer Size: 8MB MB/s > Higher Is Better run1 . 11355.9 |=============================================================== C-Blosc 2.11 Test: blosclz shuffle - Buffer Size: 16MB MB/s > Higher Is Better run1 . 9926.0 |================================================================ C-Blosc 2.11 Test: blosclz shuffle - Buffer Size: 32MB MB/s > Higher Is Better run1 . 9244.7 |================================================================ C-Blosc 2.11 Test: blosclz shuffle - Buffer Size: 64MB MB/s > Higher Is Better run1 . 8256.5 |================================================================ C-Blosc 2.11 Test: blosclz shuffle - Buffer Size: 128MB MB/s > Higher Is Better run1 . 7102.8 |================================================================ C-Blosc 2.11 Test: blosclz shuffle - Buffer Size: 256MB MB/s > Higher Is Better run1 . 5516.8 |================================================================ C-Blosc 2.11 Test: blosclz noshuffle - Buffer Size: 8MB MB/s > Higher Is Better run1 . 7866.9 |================================================================ C-Blosc 2.11 Test: blosclz noshuffle - Buffer Size: 16MB MB/s > Higher Is Better run1 . 5013.1 |================================================================ C-Blosc 2.11 Test: blosclz noshuffle - Buffer Size: 32MB MB/s > Higher Is Better run1 . 4320.0 |================================================================ C-Blosc 2.11 Test: blosclz noshuffle - Buffer Size: 64MB MB/s > Higher Is Better run1 . 4121.5 |================================================================ C-Blosc 2.11 Test: blosclz noshuffle - Buffer Size: 128MB MB/s > Higher Is Better run1 . 3852.3 |================================================================ C-Blosc 2.11 Test: blosclz noshuffle - Buffer Size: 256MB MB/s > Higher Is Better run1 . 3499.9 |================================================================ C-Blosc 2.11 Test: blosclz bitshuffle - Buffer Size: 8MB MB/s > Higher Is Better run1 . 10405.6 |=============================================================== C-Blosc 2.11 Test: blosclz bitshuffle - Buffer Size: 16MB MB/s > Higher Is Better run1 . 9259.0 |================================================================ C-Blosc 2.11 Test: blosclz bitshuffle - Buffer Size: 32MB MB/s > Higher Is Better run1 . 8698.3 |================================================================ C-Blosc 2.11 Test: blosclz bitshuffle - Buffer Size: 64MB MB/s > Higher Is Better run1 . 7736.1 |================================================================ C-Blosc 2.11 Test: blosclz bitshuffle - Buffer Size: 128MB MB/s > Higher Is Better run1 . 6532.3 |================================================================ C-Blosc 2.11 Test: blosclz bitshuffle - Buffer Size: 256MB MB/s > Higher Is Better run1 . 5240.7 |================================================================ Zstd Compression 1.5.4 Compression Level: 3 - Compression Speed MB/s > Higher Is Better run1 . 1480.1 |================================================================ Zstd Compression 1.5.4 Compression Level: 3, Long Mode - Compression Speed MB/s > Higher Is Better run1 . 772.6 |================================================================= Zstd Compression 1.5.4 Compression Level: 3, Long Mode - Decompression Speed MB/s > Higher Is Better run1 . 1562.0 |================================================================ Zstd Compression 1.5.4 Compression Level: 8 - Compression Speed MB/s > Higher Is Better run1 . 358.3 |================================================================= Zstd Compression 1.5.4 Compression Level: 8 - Decompression Speed MB/s > Higher Is Better run1 . 1679.7 |================================================================ Zstd Compression 1.5.4 Compression Level: 8, Long Mode - Compression Speed MB/s > Higher Is Better run1 . 367.0 |================================================================= Zstd Compression 1.5.4 Compression Level: 8, Long Mode - Decompression Speed MB/s > Higher Is Better run1 . 1691.0 |================================================================ Zstd Compression 1.5.4 Compression Level: 12 - Compression Speed MB/s > Higher Is Better run1 . 145.8 |================================================================= Zstd Compression 1.5.4 Compression Level: 12 - Decompression Speed MB/s > Higher Is Better run1 . 1712.7 |================================================================ Zstd Compression 1.5.4 Compression Level: 19 - Compression Speed MB/s > Higher Is Better run1 . 12.6 |================================================================== Zstd Compression 1.5.4 Compression Level: 19 - Decompression Speed MB/s > Higher Is Better run1 . 1487.3 |================================================================ Zstd Compression 1.5.4 Compression Level: 19, Long Mode - Compression Speed MB/s > Higher Is Better run1 . 7.02 |================================================================== Zstd Compression 1.5.4 Compression Level: 19, Long Mode - Decompression Speed MB/s > Higher Is Better run1 . 1400.9 |================================================================ Cryptsetup AES-XTS 256b Encryption MiB/s > Higher Is Better run1 . 4446.7 |================================================================ Cryptsetup AES-XTS 256b Decryption MiB/s > Higher Is Better run1 . 4450.2 |================================================================ Cryptsetup Serpent-XTS 256b Encryption MiB/s > Higher Is Better run1 . 653.5 |================================================================= Cryptsetup Serpent-XTS 256b Decryption MiB/s > Higher Is Better run1 . 674.5 |================================================================= Cryptsetup Twofish-XTS 256b Encryption MiB/s > Higher Is Better run1 . 455.1 |================================================================= Cryptsetup Twofish-XTS 256b Decryption MiB/s > Higher Is Better run1 . 457.6 |================================================================= Cryptsetup AES-XTS 512b Encryption MiB/s > Higher Is Better run1 . 4097.2 |================================================================ Cryptsetup AES-XTS 512b Decryption MiB/s > Higher Is Better run1 . 4084.9 |================================================================ Cryptsetup Serpent-XTS 512b Encryption MiB/s > Higher Is Better run1 . 656.4 |================================================================= Cryptsetup Twofish-XTS 512b Encryption MiB/s > Higher Is Better run1 . 456.0 |================================================================= Cryptsetup Twofish-XTS 512b Decryption MiB/s > Higher Is Better run1 . 457.4 |================================================================= Cryptsetup Serpent-XTS 512b Decryption MiB/s > Higher Is Better run1 . 673.7 |================================================================= Node.js V8 Web Tooling Benchmark runs/s > Higher Is Better run1 . 14.71 |================================================================= PyPerformance 1.0.0 Benchmark: 2to3 Milliseconds < Lower Is Better run1 . 236 |=================================================================== PyPerformance 1.0.0 Benchmark: chaos Milliseconds < Lower Is Better run1 . 67.8 |================================================================== PyPerformance 1.0.0 Benchmark: crypto_pyaes Milliseconds < Lower Is Better run1 . 75.3 |================================================================== PyPerformance 1.0.0 Benchmark: django_template Milliseconds < Lower Is Better run1 . 32.5 |================================================================== PyPerformance 1.0.0 Benchmark: float Milliseconds < Lower Is Better run1 . 71.8 |================================================================== PyPerformance 1.0.0 Benchmark: go Milliseconds < Lower Is Better run1 . 163 |=================================================================== PyPerformance 1.0.0 Benchmark: json_loads Milliseconds < Lower Is Better run1 . 17.9 |================================================================== PyPerformance 1.0.0 Benchmark: nbody Milliseconds < Lower Is Better run1 . 93.4 |================================================================== PyPerformance 1.0.0 Benchmark: pathlib Milliseconds < Lower Is Better run1 . 13.4 |================================================================== PyPerformance 1.0.0 Benchmark: pickle_pure_python Milliseconds < Lower Is Better run1 . 294 |=================================================================== PyPerformance 1.0.0 Benchmark: python_startup Milliseconds < Lower Is Better run1 . 8.78 |================================================================== PyPerformance 1.0.0 Benchmark: raytrace Milliseconds < Lower Is Better run1 . 315 |=================================================================== PyPerformance 1.0.0 Benchmark: regex_compile Milliseconds < Lower Is Better run1 . 123 |=================================================================== PyBench 2018-02-16 Total For Average Test Times Milliseconds < Lower Is Better run1 . 705 |=================================================================== simdjson 2.0 Test Run Time - Throughput Test: PartialTweets Seconds < Lower Is Better run1 . 69.01 |================================================================= simdjson 2.0 Test Run Time - Throughput Test: LargeRandom Seconds < Lower Is Better run1 . 50.26 |================================================================= simdjson 2.0 Test Run Time - Throughput Test: Kostya Seconds < Lower Is Better run1 . 55.77 |================================================================= simdjson 2.0 Test Run Time - Throughput Test: DistinctUserID Seconds < Lower Is Better run1 . 67.67 |================================================================= simdjson 2.0 Test Run Time - Throughput Test: TopTweet Seconds < Lower Is Better run1 . 67.32 |================================================================= SQLite Speedtest 3.30 Timed Time - Size 1,000 Seconds < Lower Is Better run1 . 50.03 |================================================================= SQLite Speedtest 3.30 Test Run Time Seconds < Lower Is Better run1 . 50.07 |================================================================= Node.js V8 Web Tooling Benchmark Test Run Time Seconds < Lower Is Better run1 . 60.76 |================================================================= Git Time To Complete Common Git Commands Seconds < Lower Is Better run1 . 48.73 |================================================================= Git Test Run Time Seconds < Lower Is Better run1 . 48.73 |================================================================= C-Blosc 2.11 Test Run Time - Test: blosclz shuffle - Buffer Size: 8MB Seconds < Lower Is Better run1 . 7.95 |================================================================== C-Blosc 2.11 Test Run Time - Test: blosclz shuffle - Buffer Size: 16MB Seconds < Lower Is Better run1 . 9.09 |================================================================== C-Blosc 2.11 Test Run Time - Test: blosclz shuffle - Buffer Size: 32MB Seconds < Lower Is Better run1 . 9.76 |================================================================== C-Blosc 2.11 Test Run Time - Test: blosclz shuffle - Buffer Size: 64MB Seconds < Lower Is Better run1 . 10.92 |================================================================= C-Blosc 2.11 Test Run Time - Test: blosclz shuffle - Buffer Size: 128MB Seconds < Lower Is Better run1 . 12.7 |================================================================== C-Blosc 2.11 Test Run Time - Test: blosclz shuffle - Buffer Size: 256MB Seconds < Lower Is Better run1 . 16.35 |================================================================= C-Blosc 2.11 Test Run Time - Test: blosclz noshuffle - Buffer Size: 8MB Seconds < Lower Is Better run1 . 11.47 |================================================================= C-Blosc 2.11 Test Run Time - Test: blosclz noshuffle - Buffer Size: 16MB Seconds < Lower Is Better run1 . 17.99 |================================================================= C-Blosc 2.11 Test Run Time - Test: blosclz noshuffle - Buffer Size: 32MB Seconds < Lower Is Better run1 . 20.88 |================================================================= C-Blosc 2.11 Test Run Time - Test: blosclz noshuffle - Buffer Size: 64MB Seconds < Lower Is Better run1 . 21.88 |================================================================= C-Blosc 2.11 Test Run Time - Test: blosclz noshuffle - Buffer Size: 128MB Seconds < Lower Is Better run1 . 23.41 |================================================================= C-Blosc 2.11 Test Run Time - Test: blosclz noshuffle - Buffer Size: 256MB Seconds < Lower Is Better run1 . 25.76 |================================================================= C-Blosc 2.11 Test Run Time - Test: blosclz bitshuffle - Buffer Size: 8MB Seconds < Lower Is Better run1 . 8.67 |================================================================== C-Blosc 2.11 Test Run Time - Test: blosclz bitshuffle - Buffer Size: 16MB Seconds < Lower Is Better run1 . 9.75 |================================================================== C-Blosc 2.11 Test Run Time - Test: blosclz bitshuffle - Buffer Size: 32MB Seconds < Lower Is Better run1 . 10.37 |================================================================= C-Blosc 2.11 Test Run Time - Test: blosclz bitshuffle - Buffer Size: 64MB Seconds < Lower Is Better run1 . 11.66 |================================================================= C-Blosc 2.11 Test Run Time - Test: blosclz bitshuffle - Buffer Size: 128MB Seconds < Lower Is Better run1 . 13.8 |================================================================== C-Blosc 2.11 Test Run Time - Test: blosclz bitshuffle - Buffer Size: 256MB Seconds < Lower Is Better run1 . 17.2 |================================================================== Zstd Compression 1.5.4 Test Run Time - Compression Level: 3 Seconds < Lower Is Better run1 . 62.04 |================================================================= Zstd Compression 1.5.4 Test Run Time - Compression Level: 3, Long Mode Seconds < Lower Is Better run1 . 62.57 |================================================================= Zstd Compression 1.5.4 Test Run Time - Compression Level: 8 Seconds < Lower Is Better run1 . 62.73 |================================================================= Zstd Compression 1.5.4 Test Run Time - Compression Level: 8, Long Mode Seconds < Lower Is Better run1 . 63.01 |================================================================= Zstd Compression 1.5.4 Test Run Time - Compression Level: 12 Seconds < Lower Is Better run1 . 62.15 |================================================================= Zstd Compression 1.5.4 Test Run Time - Compression Level: 19 Seconds < Lower Is Better run1 . 65.19 |================================================================= Zstd Compression 1.5.4 Test Run Time - Compression Level: 19, Long Mode Seconds < Lower Is Better run1 . 62.12 |================================================================= PyPerformance 1.0.0 Test Run Time - Benchmark: 2to3 Seconds < Lower Is Better run1 . 51 |==================================================================== PyPerformance 1.0.0 Test Run Time - Benchmark: chaos Seconds < Lower Is Better run1 . 24.91 |================================================================= PyPerformance 1.0.0 Test Run Time - Benchmark: crypto_pyaes Seconds < Lower Is Better run1 . 26.68 |================================================================= PyPerformance 1.0.0 Test Run Time - Benchmark: django_template Seconds < Lower Is Better run1 . 28.4 |================================================================== PyPerformance 1.0.0 Test Run Time - Benchmark: float Seconds < Lower Is Better run1 . 25.73 |================================================================= PyPerformance 1.0.0 Test Run Time - Benchmark: go Seconds < Lower Is Better run1 . 28.63 |================================================================= PyPerformance 1.0.0 Test Run Time - Benchmark: json_loads Seconds < Lower Is Better run1 . 32.19 |================================================================= PyPerformance 1.0.0 Test Run Time - Benchmark: nbody Seconds < Lower Is Better run1 . 32.59 |================================================================= PyPerformance 1.0.0 Test Run Time - Benchmark: pathlib Seconds < Lower Is Better run1 . 22.38 |================================================================= PyPerformance 1.0.0 Test Run Time - Benchmark: pickle_pure_python Seconds < Lower Is Better run1 . 32.94 |================================================================= PyPerformance 1.0.0 Test Run Time - Benchmark: python_startup Seconds < Lower Is Better run1 . 72.7 |================================================================== PyPerformance 1.0.0 Test Run Time - Benchmark: raytrace Seconds < Lower Is Better run1 . 53.49 |================================================================= PyPerformance 1.0.0 Test Run Time - Benchmark: regex_compile Seconds < Lower Is Better run1 . 24.33 |================================================================= PyBench 2018-02-16 Test Run Time Seconds < Lower Is Better run1 . 16.36 |================================================================= Cryptsetup Test Run Time Seconds < Lower Is Better run1 . 37.35 |================================================================= Timed Apache Compilation 2.4.41 Time To Compile Seconds < Lower Is Better run1 . 19.94 |================================================================= Timed Apache Compilation 2.4.41 Test Run Time Seconds < Lower Is Better run1 . 19.94 |================================================================= Timed PHP Compilation 8.1.9 Time To Compile Seconds < Lower Is Better run1 . 63.13 |================================================================= Timed PHP Compilation 8.1.9 Test Run Time Seconds < Lower Is Better run1 . 63.13 |================================================================= Timed Eigen Compilation 3.3.9 Time To Compile Seconds < Lower Is Better run1 . 64.08 |================================================================= Timed Eigen Compilation 3.3.9 Test Run Time Seconds < Lower Is Better run1 . 64.08 |================================================================= Timed Linux Kernel Compilation 6.1 Build: defconfig Seconds < Lower Is Better Timed Linux Kernel Compilation 6.1 Test Run Time - Build: defconfig Seconds < Lower Is Better run1 . 1.82 |================================================================== Timed Linux Kernel Compilation 6.1 Build: allmodconfig Seconds < Lower Is Better Timed Linux Kernel Compilation 6.1 Test Run Time - Build: allmodconfig Seconds < Lower Is Better run1 . 2.21 |================================================================== Timed ImageMagick Compilation 6.9.0 Time To Compile Seconds < Lower Is Better run1 . 25.71 |================================================================= Timed ImageMagick Compilation 6.9.0 Test Run Time Seconds < Lower Is Better run1 . 25.71 |================================================================= Timed GCC Compilation 13.2 Seconds < Lower Is Better Timed GCC Compilation 13.2 Test Run Time Seconds < Lower Is Better run1 . 0.01 |================================================================== Timed GDB GNU Debugger Compilation 10.2 Seconds < Lower Is Better Timed GDB GNU Debugger Compilation 10.2 Test Run Time Seconds < Lower Is Better run1 . 61.92 |================================================================= Timed LLVM Compilation 16.0 Build System: Ninja Seconds < Lower Is Better run1 . 805.00 |================================================================ Timed LLVM Compilation 16.0 Test Run Time - Build System: Ninja Seconds < Lower Is Better run1 . 805 |=================================================================== Timed LLVM Compilation 16.0 Build System: Unix Makefiles Seconds < Lower Is Better run1 . 822.02 |================================================================ Timed LLVM Compilation 16.0 Test Run Time - Build System: Unix Makefiles Seconds < Lower Is Better run1 . 822.02 |================================================================ Timed FFmpeg Compilation 6.1 Time To Compile Seconds < Lower Is Better run1 . 51.84 |================================================================= Timed FFmpeg Compilation 6.1 Test Run Time Seconds < Lower Is Better run1 . 51.84 |================================================================= Build2 0.15 Time To Compile Seconds < Lower Is Better run1 . 160.63 |================================================================ Build2 0.15 Test Run Time Seconds < Lower Is Better run1 . 160.63 |================================================================ Timed CPython Compilation 3.10.6 Build Configuration: Default Seconds < Lower Is Better run1 . 18.90 |================================================================= Timed CPython Compilation 3.10.6 Test Run Time - Build Configuration: Default Seconds < Lower Is Better run1 . 18.9 |================================================================== Timed CPython Compilation 3.10.6 Build Configuration: Released Build, PGO + LTO Optimized Seconds < Lower Is Better run1 . 247.28 |================================================================ Timed CPython Compilation 3.10.6 Test Run Time - Build Configuration: Released Build, PGO + LTO Optimized Seconds < Lower Is Better run1 . 247.28 |================================================================ Timed Godot Game Engine Compilation 4.0 Time To Compile Seconds < Lower Is Better run1 . 397.07 |================================================================ Timed Godot Game Engine Compilation 4.0 Test Run Time Seconds < Lower Is Better run1 . 397.07 |================================================================ Timed Erlang/OTP Compilation 25.0 Time To Compile Seconds < Lower Is Better run1 . 96.57 |================================================================= Timed Erlang/OTP Compilation 25.0 Test Run Time Seconds < Lower Is Better run1 . 96.58 |================================================================= Timed Node.js Compilation 19.8.1 Time To Compile Seconds < Lower Is Better run1 . 677.89 |================================================================ Timed Node.js Compilation 19.8.1 Test Run Time Seconds < Lower Is Better run1 . 677.89 |================================================================ Timed Mesa Compilation 21.0 Seconds < Lower Is Better Timed Mesa Compilation 21.0 Test Run Time Seconds < Lower Is Better run1 . 0.01 |================================================================== Timed Gem5 Compilation 23.0.1 Time To Compile Seconds < Lower Is Better run1 . 575.76 |================================================================ Timed Gem5 Compilation 23.0.1 Test Run Time Seconds < Lower Is Better run1 . 575.75 |================================================================ ACES DGEMM 1.0 Test Run Time Seconds < Lower Is Better run1 . 77.37 |================================================================= ArrayFire 3.9 Test Run Time - Test: BLAS CPU Seconds < Lower Is Better run1 . 84.98 |================================================================= Algebraic Multi-Grid Benchmark 1.2 Test Run Time Seconds < Lower Is Better run1 . 32.98 |================================================================= HPC Challenge 1.5.0 Test Run Time - Test / Class: G-HPL Seconds < Lower Is Better run1 . 2666.72 |===============================================================