nuc1

Intel Core i5-13500H testing with a Simply NUC NUC13OXi5B (1.08 BIOS) and Intel RPL-P 31GB on Ubuntu 22.04 via the Phoronix Test Suite.

Compare your own system(s) to this result file with the Phoronix Test Suite by running the command: phoronix-test-suite benchmark 2402212-NE-NUC14563458
Jump To Table - Results

Statistics

Remove Outliers Before Calculating Averages

Graph Settings

Prefer Vertical Bar Graphs

Multi-Way Comparison

Condense Multi-Option Tests Into Single Result Graphs
Condense Test Profiles With Multiple Version Results Into Single Result Graphs

Table

Show Detailed System Result Table

Run Management

Result
Identifier
View Logs
Performance Per
Dollar
Date
Run
  Test
  Duration
run1
February 20
  7 Hours, 57 Minutes
Only show results matching title/arguments (delimit multiple options with a comma):
Do not show results matching title/arguments (delimit multiple options with a comma):

nuc1, "ACES DGEMM 1.0 - Sustained Floating-Point Rate", Higher Results Are Better "run1",3.0178,2.980655,3.003008 "ACES DGEMM 1.0 - Test Run Time", Lower Results Are Better "run1",76.92,77.88,77.30 "Algebraic Multi-Grid Benchmark 1.2 - ", Higher Results Are Better "run1",220742400,207209000,212975400,219991100,202985300,220850400,220247800,215734000,215312300,216401800,212566400,218884300,220426000,218039200,220361700 "Algebraic Multi-Grid Benchmark 1.2 - Test Run Time", Lower Results Are Better "run1",32.59,33.95,33.28,33.07,34.59,32.43,32.87,32.74,32.64,32.97,33.51,32.52,32.18,32.51,32.79 "ArrayFire 3.9 - Test: BLAS CPU", Higher Results Are Better "run1",34.3757,33.2633,34.3238 "ArrayFire 3.9 - Test Run Time - Test: BLAS CPU", Lower Results Are Better "run1",84.56,85.62,84.75 "Build2 0.15 - Time To Compile", Lower Results Are Better "run1",166.498,159.174,158.546,158.298 "Build2 0.15 - Test Run Time", Lower Results Are Better "run1",166.50,159.17,158.55,158.30 "C-Blosc 2.11 - Test: blosclz shuffle - Buffer Size: 8MB", Higher Results Are Better "run1",11474.5,11393.3,11199.9 "C-Blosc 2.11 - Test Run Time - Test: blosclz shuffle - Buffer Size: 8MB", Lower Results Are Better "run1",7.87,7.92,8.06 "C-Blosc 2.11 - Test: blosclz shuffle - Buffer Size: 16MB", Higher Results Are Better "run1",9720.7,10010.8,10046.6 "C-Blosc 2.11 - Test Run Time - Test: blosclz shuffle - Buffer Size: 16MB", Lower Results Are Better "run1",9.28,9.01,8.98 "C-Blosc 2.11 - Test: blosclz shuffle - Buffer Size: 32MB", Higher Results Are Better "run1",9193.4,9326.3,9214.3 "C-Blosc 2.11 - Test Run Time - Test: blosclz shuffle - Buffer Size: 32MB", Lower Results Are Better "run1",9.81,9.67,9.79 "C-Blosc 2.11 - Test: blosclz shuffle - Buffer Size: 64MB", Higher Results Are Better "run1",8219.1,8266.5,8284 "C-Blosc 2.11 - Test Run Time - Test: blosclz shuffle - Buffer Size: 64MB", Lower Results Are Better "run1",10.97,10.91,10.89 "C-Blosc 2.11 - Test: blosclz shuffle - Buffer Size: 128MB", Higher Results Are Better "run1",7077.7,7095.3,7135.4 "C-Blosc 2.11 - Test Run Time - Test: blosclz shuffle - Buffer Size: 128MB", Lower Results Are Better "run1",12.74,12.71,12.64 "C-Blosc 2.11 - Test: blosclz shuffle - Buffer Size: 256MB", Higher Results Are Better "run1",5553.4,5563.5,5433.5 "C-Blosc 2.11 - Test Run Time - Test: blosclz shuffle - Buffer Size: 256MB", Lower Results Are Better "run1",16.24,16.21,16.60 "C-Blosc 2.11 - Test: blosclz noshuffle - Buffer Size: 8MB", Higher Results Are Better "run1",8040.1,7740.2,7820.3 "C-Blosc 2.11 - Test Run Time - Test: blosclz noshuffle - Buffer Size: 8MB", Lower Results Are Better "run1",11.22,11.65,11.53 "C-Blosc 2.11 - Test: blosclz noshuffle - Buffer Size: 16MB", Higher Results Are Better "run1",4994.4,5145.2,4899.8 "C-Blosc 2.11 - Test Run Time - Test: blosclz noshuffle - Buffer Size: 16MB", Lower Results Are Better "run1",18.05,17.52,18.40 "C-Blosc 2.11 - Test: blosclz noshuffle - Buffer Size: 32MB", Higher Results Are Better "run1",4170.4,4403.1,4310.9,4400.8,4315 "C-Blosc 2.11 - Test Run Time - Test: blosclz noshuffle - Buffer Size: 32MB", Lower Results Are Better "run1",21.62,20.47,20.91,20.49,20.89 "C-Blosc 2.11 - Test: blosclz noshuffle - Buffer Size: 64MB", Higher Results Are Better "run1",4027.3,4132.9,4204.2 "C-Blosc 2.11 - Test Run Time - Test: blosclz noshuffle - Buffer Size: 64MB", Lower Results Are Better "run1",22.38,21.81,21.44 "C-Blosc 2.11 - Test: blosclz noshuffle - Buffer Size: 128MB", Higher Results Are Better "run1",3919.7,3896.6,3739.5,3853.2 "C-Blosc 2.11 - Test Run Time - Test: blosclz noshuffle - Buffer Size: 128MB", Lower Results Are Better "run1",23.00,23.13,24.11,23.40 "C-Blosc 2.11 - Test: blosclz noshuffle - Buffer Size: 256MB", Higher Results Are Better "run1",3533.8,3459.5,3506.4 "C-Blosc 2.11 - Test Run Time - Test: blosclz noshuffle - Buffer Size: 256MB", Lower Results Are Better "run1",25.51,26.06,25.71 "C-Blosc 2.11 - Test: blosclz bitshuffle - Buffer Size: 8MB", Higher Results Are Better "run1",10153,10612,10451.7 "C-Blosc 2.11 - Test Run Time - Test: blosclz bitshuffle - Buffer Size: 8MB", Lower Results Are Better "run1",8.89,8.50,8.63 "C-Blosc 2.11 - Test: blosclz bitshuffle - Buffer Size: 16MB", Higher Results Are Better "run1",9381.6,9379.4,9016.1 "C-Blosc 2.11 - Test Run Time - Test: blosclz bitshuffle - Buffer Size: 16MB", Lower Results Are Better "run1",9.62,9.62,10.00 "C-Blosc 2.11 - Test: blosclz bitshuffle - Buffer Size: 32MB", Higher Results Are Better "run1",8601,8833.9,8659.9 "C-Blosc 2.11 - Test Run Time - Test: blosclz bitshuffle - Buffer Size: 32MB", Lower Results Are Better "run1",10.49,10.21,10.42 "C-Blosc 2.11 - Test: blosclz bitshuffle - Buffer Size: 64MB", Higher Results Are Better "run1",7734.1,7792.2,7682.1 "C-Blosc 2.11 - Test Run Time - Test: blosclz bitshuffle - Buffer Size: 64MB", Lower Results Are Better "run1",11.66,11.57,11.74 "C-Blosc 2.11 - Test: blosclz bitshuffle - Buffer Size: 128MB", Higher Results Are Better "run1",6590.8,6580.1,6426.1 "C-Blosc 2.11 - Test Run Time - Test: blosclz bitshuffle - Buffer Size: 128MB", Lower Results Are Better "run1",13.68,13.70,14.03 "C-Blosc 2.11 - Test: blosclz bitshuffle - Buffer Size: 256MB", Higher Results Are Better "run1",5285,5186.8,5250.4 "C-Blosc 2.11 - Test Run Time - Test: blosclz bitshuffle - Buffer Size: 256MB", Lower Results Are Better "run1",17.06,17.38,17.17 "Cryptsetup - PBKDF2-sha512", Higher Results Are Better "run1",1885928,1889326,1882542 "Cryptsetup - PBKDF2-whirlpool", Higher Results Are Better "run1",878204,878204,878204 "Cryptsetup - AES-XTS 256b Encryption", Higher Results Are Better "run1",4461.1,4447.3,4431.6 "Cryptsetup - AES-XTS 256b Decryption", Higher Results Are Better "run1",4473.8,4445.8,4430.9 "Cryptsetup - Serpent-XTS 256b Encryption", Higher Results Are Better "run1",648,656.9,655.5 "Cryptsetup - Serpent-XTS 256b Decryption", Higher Results Are Better "run1",674.5,675,673.9 "Cryptsetup - Twofish-XTS 256b Encryption", Higher Results Are Better "run1",452.8,456.5,455.9 "Cryptsetup - Twofish-XTS 256b Decryption", Higher Results Are Better "run1",457.7,457.6,457.5 "Cryptsetup - AES-XTS 512b Encryption", Higher Results Are Better "run1",4113.3,4098.9,4079.5 "Cryptsetup - AES-XTS 512b Decryption", Higher Results Are Better "run1",4102.1,4085.9,4066.6 "Cryptsetup - Serpent-XTS 512b Encryption", Higher Results Are Better "run1",656,656.8 "Cryptsetup - Twofish-XTS 512b Encryption", Higher Results Are Better "run1",456.3,456.1,455.5 "Cryptsetup - Twofish-XTS 512b Decryption", Higher Results Are Better "run1",457.5,457.8,457 "Cryptsetup - Serpent-XTS 512b Decryption", Higher Results Are Better "run1", "Cryptsetup - Test Run Time", Lower Results Are Better "run1",37.37,37.32,37.37 "Git - Time To Complete Common Git Commands", Lower Results Are Better "run1",48.849,48.681,48.655 "Git - Test Run Time", Lower Results Are Better "run1",48.85,48.68,48.66 "HPC Challenge 1.5.0 - Test / Class: G-HPL", Higher Results Are Better "run1",44.6632,44.6459,44.6401 "HPC Challenge 1.5.0 - Test Run Time - Test / Class: G-HPL", Lower Results Are Better "run1",2656.86,2676.40,2666.89 "Node.js V8 Web Tooling Benchmark - ", Higher Results Are Better "run1",14.7,14.77,14.66 "Node.js V8 Web Tooling Benchmark - Test Run Time", Lower Results Are Better "run1",60.55,60.57,61.16 "PyBench 2018-02-16 - Total For Average Test Times", Lower Results Are Better "run1",705,705,706 "PyBench 2018-02-16 - Test Run Time", Lower Results Are Better "run1",16.36,16.36,16.35 "PyPerformance 1.0.0 - Benchmark: 2to3", Lower Results Are Better "run1",236,236,236 "PyPerformance 1.0.0 - Test Run Time - Benchmark: 2to3", Lower Results Are Better "run1",67.08,42.98,42.95 "PyPerformance 1.0.0 - Benchmark: chaos", Lower Results Are Better "run1",67.5,68.1,67.8 "PyPerformance 1.0.0 - Test Run Time - Benchmark: chaos", Lower Results Are Better "run1",24.84,24.99,24.90 "PyPerformance 1.0.0 - Benchmark: crypto_pyaes", Lower Results Are Better "run1",75.4,75.2,75.4 "PyPerformance 1.0.0 - Test Run Time - Benchmark: crypto_pyaes", Lower Results Are Better "run1",26.70,26.65,26.70 "PyPerformance 1.0.0 - Benchmark: django_template", Lower Results Are Better "run1",32.4,32.6,32.6 "PyPerformance 1.0.0 - Test Run Time - Benchmark: django_template", Lower Results Are Better "run1",28.32,28.43,28.45 "PyPerformance 1.0.0 - Benchmark: float", Lower Results Are Better "run1",72,71.8,71.6 "PyPerformance 1.0.0 - Test Run Time - Benchmark: float", Lower Results Are Better "run1",25.80,25.74,25.66 "PyPerformance 1.0.0 - Benchmark: go", Lower Results Are Better "run1",163,163,162 "PyPerformance 1.0.0 - Test Run Time - Benchmark: go", Lower Results Are Better "run1",28.68,28.70,28.51 "PyPerformance 1.0.0 - Benchmark: json_loads", Lower Results Are Better "run1",17.9,17.9,17.9 "PyPerformance 1.0.0 - Test Run Time - Benchmark: json_loads", Lower Results Are Better "run1",32.21,32.14,32.21 "PyPerformance 1.0.0 - Benchmark: nbody", Lower Results Are Better "run1",93.6,93.2,93.5 "PyPerformance 1.0.0 - Test Run Time - Benchmark: nbody", Lower Results Are Better "run1",32.60,32.57,32.59 "PyPerformance 1.0.0 - Benchmark: pathlib", Lower Results Are Better "run1",13.4,13.4,13.3 "PyPerformance 1.0.0 - Test Run Time - Benchmark: pathlib", Lower Results Are Better "run1",22.40,22.42,22.33 "PyPerformance 1.0.0 - Benchmark: pickle_pure_python", Lower Results Are Better "run1",293,294,294 "PyPerformance 1.0.0 - Test Run Time - Benchmark: pickle_pure_python", Lower Results Are Better "run1",32.91,32.95,32.96 "PyPerformance 1.0.0 - Benchmark: python_startup", Lower Results Are Better "run1",8.72,8.78,8.83 "PyPerformance 1.0.0 - Test Run Time - Benchmark: python_startup", Lower Results Are Better "run1",72.17,72.70,73.24 "PyPerformance 1.0.0 - Benchmark: raytrace", Lower Results Are Better "run1",315,315,315 "PyPerformance 1.0.0 - Test Run Time - Benchmark: raytrace", Lower Results Are Better "run1",53.48,53.48,53.52 "PyPerformance 1.0.0 - Benchmark: regex_compile", Lower Results Are Better "run1",123,123,123 "PyPerformance 1.0.0 - Test Run Time - Benchmark: regex_compile", Lower Results Are Better "run1",24.39,24.30,24.29 "simdjson 2.0 - Throughput Test: PartialTweets", Higher Results Are Better "run1",4.35,4.35,4.34 "simdjson 2.0 - Test Run Time - Throughput Test: PartialTweets", Lower Results Are Better "run1",69.03,68.90,69.10 "simdjson 2.0 - Throughput Test: LargeRandom", Higher Results Are Better "run1",1.26,1.26,1.26 "simdjson 2.0 - Test Run Time - Throughput Test: LargeRandom", Lower Results Are Better "run1",50.25,50.27,50.25 "simdjson 2.0 - Throughput Test: Kostya", Higher Results Are Better "run1",3.69,3.69,3.69 "simdjson 2.0 - Test Run Time - Throughput Test: Kostya", Lower Results Are Better "run1",55.80,55.78,55.74 "simdjson 2.0 - Throughput Test: DistinctUserID", Higher Results Are Better "run1",5.18,5.18,5.18 "simdjson 2.0 - Test Run Time - Throughput Test: DistinctUserID", Lower Results Are Better "run1",67.79,67.57,67.66 "simdjson 2.0 - Throughput Test: TopTweet", Higher Results Are Better "run1",5.11,5.11,5.1 "simdjson 2.0 - Test Run Time - Throughput Test: TopTweet", Lower Results Are Better "run1",67.20,67.34,67.43 "SQLite Speedtest 3.30 - Timed Time - Size 1,000", Lower Results Are Better "run1",49.97,50.093,50.021 "SQLite Speedtest 3.30 - Test Run Time", Lower Results Are Better "run1",50.01,50.13,50.06 "Timed Apache Compilation 2.4.41 - Time To Compile", Lower Results Are Better "run1",19.769,19.83,20.22 "Timed Apache Compilation 2.4.41 - Test Run Time", Lower Results Are Better "run1",19.77,19.83,20.22 "Timed CPython Compilation 3.10.6 - Build Configuration: Default", Lower Results Are Better "run1", "Timed CPython Compilation 3.10.6 - Test Run Time - Build Configuration: Default", Lower Results Are Better "run1", "Timed CPython Compilation 3.10.6 - Build Configuration: Released Build, PGO + LTO Optimized", Lower Results Are Better "run1", "Timed CPython Compilation 3.10.6 - Test Run Time - Build Configuration: Released Build, PGO + LTO Optimized", Lower Results Are Better "run1", "Timed Eigen Compilation 3.3.9 - Time To Compile", Lower Results Are Better "run1",64.148,63.986,64.091 "Timed Eigen Compilation 3.3.9 - Test Run Time", Lower Results Are Better "run1",64.15,63.99,64.09 "Timed Erlang/OTP Compilation 25.0 - Time To Compile", Lower Results Are Better "run1",96.528,96.275,96.917 "Timed Erlang/OTP Compilation 25.0 - Test Run Time", Lower Results Are Better "run1",96.53,96.28,96.92 "Timed FFmpeg Compilation 6.1 - Time To Compile", Lower Results Are Better "run1",51.432,52.013,52.066 "Timed FFmpeg Compilation 6.1 - Test Run Time", Lower Results Are Better "run1",51.43,52.01,52.07 "Timed GCC Compilation 13.2 - ", Lower Results Are Better "run1", "Timed GCC Compilation 13.2 - Test Run Time", Lower Results Are Better "run1",0.01,0.01,0.01 "Timed GDB GNU Debugger Compilation 10.2 - ", Lower Results Are Better "run1", "Timed GDB GNU Debugger Compilation 10.2 - Test Run Time", Lower Results Are Better "run1",61.86,62.25,61.64 "Timed Gem5 Compilation 23.0.1 - Time To Compile", Lower Results Are Better "run1",575.423,575.718,576.123 "Timed Gem5 Compilation 23.0.1 - Test Run Time", Lower Results Are Better "run1",575.42,575.72,576.12 "Timed Godot Game Engine Compilation 4.0 - Time To Compile", Lower Results Are Better "run1",397.192,397.136,396.894 "Timed Godot Game Engine Compilation 4.0 - Test Run Time", Lower Results Are Better "run1",397.19,397.14,396.89 "Timed ImageMagick Compilation 6.9.0 - Time To Compile", Lower Results Are Better "run1",25.607,26.345,25.172 "Timed ImageMagick Compilation 6.9.0 - Test Run Time", Lower Results Are Better "run1",25.61,26.34,25.17 "Timed Linux Kernel Compilation 6.1 - Build: defconfig", Lower Results Are Better "run1", "Timed Linux Kernel Compilation 6.1 - Test Run Time - Build: defconfig", Lower Results Are Better "run1",2.87,1.34,1.26 "Timed Linux Kernel Compilation 6.1 - Build: allmodconfig", Lower Results Are Better "run1", "Timed Linux Kernel Compilation 6.1 - Test Run Time - Build: allmodconfig", Lower Results Are Better "run1",3.48,1.70,1.45 "Timed LLVM Compilation 16.0 - Build System: Ninja", Lower Results Are Better "run1",805.214,806.846,802.945 "Timed LLVM Compilation 16.0 - Test Run Time - Build System: Ninja", Lower Results Are Better "run1",805.21,806.85,802.95 "Timed LLVM Compilation 16.0 - Build System: Unix Makefiles", Lower Results Are Better "run1",822.208,822.592,821.249 "Timed LLVM Compilation 16.0 - Test Run Time - Build System: Unix Makefiles", Lower Results Are Better "run1",822.21,822.59,821.25 "Timed Mesa Compilation 21.0 - ", Lower Results Are Better "run1", "Timed Mesa Compilation 21.0 - Test Run Time", Lower Results Are Better "run1",0.01,0.01,0.01 "Timed Node.js Compilation 19.8.1 - Time To Compile", Lower Results Are Better "run1",678.063,676.988,678.608 "Timed Node.js Compilation 19.8.1 - Test Run Time", Lower Results Are Better "run1",678.06,676.99,678.61 "Timed PHP Compilation 8.1.9 - Time To Compile", Lower Results Are Better "run1",63.209,63.093,63.086 "Timed PHP Compilation 8.1.9 - Test Run Time", Lower Results Are Better "run1",63.21,63.09,63.09 "Zstd Compression 1.5.4 - Compression Level: 3 - Compression Speed", Higher Results Are Better "run1",1468.8,1505.4,1466.2 "Zstd Compression 1.5.4 - Test Run Time - Compression Level: 3", Lower Results Are Better "run1",62.05,62.25,61.83 "Zstd Compression 1.5.4 - Compression Level: 3, Long Mode - Compression Speed", Higher Results Are Better "run1",765.7,772,780.1 "Zstd Compression 1.5.4 - Compression Level: 3, Long Mode - Decompression Speed", Higher Results Are Better "run1",1562.7,1560.7,1562.5 "Zstd Compression 1.5.4 - Test Run Time - Compression Level: 3, Long Mode", Lower Results Are Better "run1",62.63,62.57,62.51 "Zstd Compression 1.5.4 - Compression Level: 8 - Compression Speed", Higher Results Are Better "run1",362.8,361.1,350.9 "Zstd Compression 1.5.4 - Compression Level: 8 - Decompression Speed", Higher Results Are Better "run1",1674.2,1682.1,1682.9 "Zstd Compression 1.5.4 - Test Run Time - Compression Level: 8", Lower Results Are Better "run1",62.80,62.47,62.93 "Zstd Compression 1.5.4 - Compression Level: 8, Long Mode - Compression Speed", Higher Results Are Better "run1",365.7,368.4,366.8 "Zstd Compression 1.5.4 - Compression Level: 8, Long Mode - Decompression Speed", Higher Results Are Better "run1",1691,1690.6,1691.5 "Zstd Compression 1.5.4 - Test Run Time - Compression Level: 8, Long Mode", Lower Results Are Better "run1",63.04,63.01,62.97 "Zstd Compression 1.5.4 - Compression Level: 12 - Compression Speed", Higher Results Are Better "run1",144.5,146.1,146.7 "Zstd Compression 1.5.4 - Compression Level: 12 - Decompression Speed", Higher Results Are Better "run1",1716.8,1716.3,1705.1 "Zstd Compression 1.5.4 - Test Run Time - Compression Level: 12", Lower Results Are Better "run1",62.05,61.91,62.48 "Zstd Compression 1.5.4 - Compression Level: 19 - Compression Speed", Higher Results Are Better "run1",12.7,12.5,12.7 "Zstd Compression 1.5.4 - Compression Level: 19 - Decompression Speed", Higher Results Are Better "run1",1490.5,1479.7,1491.8 "Zstd Compression 1.5.4 - Test Run Time - Compression Level: 19", Lower Results Are Better "run1",65.01,65.52,65.05 "Zstd Compression 1.5.4 - Compression Level: 19, Long Mode - Compression Speed", Higher Results Are Better "run1",7.01,7.03,7.03 "Zstd Compression 1.5.4 - Compression Level: 19, Long Mode - Decompression Speed", Higher Results Are Better "run1",1402.5,1396.8,1403.3 "Zstd Compression 1.5.4 - Test Run Time - Compression Level: 19, Long Mode", Lower Results Are Better "run1",62.09,62.18,62.09