Intel Core i5-13500H testing with a Simply NUC NUC13OXi5B (1.08 BIOS) and Intel RPL-P 31GB on Ubuntu 22.04 via the Phoronix Test Suite.
Compare your own system(s) to this result file with the
Phoronix Test Suite by running the command:
phoronix-test-suite benchmark 2402212-NE-NUC14563458
nuc1
Intel Core i5-13500H testing with a Simply NUC NUC13OXi5B (1.08 BIOS) and Intel RPL-P 31GB on Ubuntu 22.04 via the Phoronix Test Suite.
run1:
Processor: Intel Core i5-13500H @ 4.70GHz (12 Cores / 16 Threads), Motherboard: Simply NUC NUC13OXi5B (1.08 BIOS), Chipset: Intel Alder Lake PCH, Memory: 2 x 16 GB DDR5-5200MT/s Kingston, Disk: 1024GB KINGSTON OM8PGP41024Q-A0, Graphics: Intel RPL-P 31GB (1450MHz), Audio: Realtek ALC269VB, Monitor: DELL ST2421L, Network: Intel Device 125c + Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX210/AX211/AX411
OS: Ubuntu 22.04, Kernel: 6.5.0-18-generic (x86_64), Desktop: KDE Plasma 5.24.7, Display Server: X Server 1.21.1.4, OpenGL: 4.6 Mesa 23.0.4-0ubuntu1~22.04.1, Vulkan: 1.3.238, Compiler: GCC 11.4.0, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 1920x1080
simdjson 2.0
Throughput Test: PartialTweets
GB/s > Higher Is Better
run1 . 4.35 |==================================================================
simdjson 2.0
Test Run Time - Throughput Test: PartialTweets
Seconds < Lower Is Better
run1 . 69.01 |=================================================================
simdjson 2.0
Throughput Test: LargeRandom
GB/s > Higher Is Better
run1 . 1.26 |==================================================================
simdjson 2.0
Test Run Time - Throughput Test: LargeRandom
Seconds < Lower Is Better
run1 . 50.26 |=================================================================
simdjson 2.0
Throughput Test: Kostya
GB/s > Higher Is Better
run1 . 3.69 |==================================================================
simdjson 2.0
Test Run Time - Throughput Test: Kostya
Seconds < Lower Is Better
run1 . 55.77 |=================================================================
simdjson 2.0
Throughput Test: DistinctUserID
GB/s > Higher Is Better
run1 . 5.18 |==================================================================
simdjson 2.0
Test Run Time - Throughput Test: DistinctUserID
Seconds < Lower Is Better
run1 . 67.67 |=================================================================
simdjson 2.0
Throughput Test: TopTweet
GB/s > Higher Is Better
run1 . 5.11 |==================================================================
simdjson 2.0
Test Run Time - Throughput Test: TopTweet
Seconds < Lower Is Better
run1 . 67.32 |=================================================================
SQLite Speedtest 3.30
Timed Time - Size 1,000
Seconds < Lower Is Better
run1 . 50.03 |=================================================================
SQLite Speedtest 3.30
Test Run Time
Seconds < Lower Is Better
run1 . 50.07 |=================================================================
Node.js V8 Web Tooling Benchmark
runs/s > Higher Is Better
run1 . 14.71 |=================================================================
Node.js V8 Web Tooling Benchmark
Test Run Time
Seconds < Lower Is Better
run1 . 60.76 |=================================================================
Git
Time To Complete Common Git Commands
Seconds < Lower Is Better
run1 . 48.73 |=================================================================
Git
Test Run Time
Seconds < Lower Is Better
run1 . 48.73 |=================================================================
C-Blosc 2.11
Test: blosclz shuffle - Buffer Size: 8MB
MB/s > Higher Is Better
run1 . 11355.9 |===============================================================
C-Blosc 2.11
Test Run Time - Test: blosclz shuffle - Buffer Size: 8MB
Seconds < Lower Is Better
run1 . 7.95 |==================================================================
C-Blosc 2.11
Test: blosclz shuffle - Buffer Size: 16MB
MB/s > Higher Is Better
run1 . 9926.0 |================================================================
C-Blosc 2.11
Test Run Time - Test: blosclz shuffle - Buffer Size: 16MB
Seconds < Lower Is Better
run1 . 9.09 |==================================================================
C-Blosc 2.11
Test: blosclz shuffle - Buffer Size: 32MB
MB/s > Higher Is Better
run1 . 9244.7 |================================================================
C-Blosc 2.11
Test Run Time - Test: blosclz shuffle - Buffer Size: 32MB
Seconds < Lower Is Better
run1 . 9.76 |==================================================================
C-Blosc 2.11
Test: blosclz shuffle - Buffer Size: 64MB
MB/s > Higher Is Better
run1 . 8256.5 |================================================================
C-Blosc 2.11
Test Run Time - Test: blosclz shuffle - Buffer Size: 64MB
Seconds < Lower Is Better
run1 . 10.92 |=================================================================
C-Blosc 2.11
Test: blosclz shuffle - Buffer Size: 128MB
MB/s > Higher Is Better
run1 . 7102.8 |================================================================
C-Blosc 2.11
Test Run Time - Test: blosclz shuffle - Buffer Size: 128MB
Seconds < Lower Is Better
run1 . 12.7 |==================================================================
C-Blosc 2.11
Test: blosclz shuffle - Buffer Size: 256MB
MB/s > Higher Is Better
run1 . 5516.8 |================================================================
C-Blosc 2.11
Test Run Time - Test: blosclz shuffle - Buffer Size: 256MB
Seconds < Lower Is Better
run1 . 16.35 |=================================================================
C-Blosc 2.11
Test: blosclz noshuffle - Buffer Size: 8MB
MB/s > Higher Is Better
run1 . 7866.9 |================================================================
C-Blosc 2.11
Test Run Time - Test: blosclz noshuffle - Buffer Size: 8MB
Seconds < Lower Is Better
run1 . 11.47 |=================================================================
C-Blosc 2.11
Test: blosclz noshuffle - Buffer Size: 16MB
MB/s > Higher Is Better
run1 . 5013.1 |================================================================
C-Blosc 2.11
Test Run Time - Test: blosclz noshuffle - Buffer Size: 16MB
Seconds < Lower Is Better
run1 . 17.99 |=================================================================
C-Blosc 2.11
Test: blosclz noshuffle - Buffer Size: 32MB
MB/s > Higher Is Better
run1 . 4320.0 |================================================================
C-Blosc 2.11
Test Run Time - Test: blosclz noshuffle - Buffer Size: 32MB
Seconds < Lower Is Better
run1 . 20.88 |=================================================================
C-Blosc 2.11
Test: blosclz noshuffle - Buffer Size: 64MB
MB/s > Higher Is Better
run1 . 4121.5 |================================================================
C-Blosc 2.11
Test Run Time - Test: blosclz noshuffle - Buffer Size: 64MB
Seconds < Lower Is Better
run1 . 21.88 |=================================================================
C-Blosc 2.11
Test: blosclz noshuffle - Buffer Size: 128MB
MB/s > Higher Is Better
run1 . 3852.3 |================================================================
C-Blosc 2.11
Test Run Time - Test: blosclz noshuffle - Buffer Size: 128MB
Seconds < Lower Is Better
run1 . 23.41 |=================================================================
C-Blosc 2.11
Test: blosclz noshuffle - Buffer Size: 256MB
MB/s > Higher Is Better
run1 . 3499.9 |================================================================
C-Blosc 2.11
Test Run Time - Test: blosclz noshuffle - Buffer Size: 256MB
Seconds < Lower Is Better
run1 . 25.76 |=================================================================
C-Blosc 2.11
Test: blosclz bitshuffle - Buffer Size: 8MB
MB/s > Higher Is Better
run1 . 10405.6 |===============================================================
C-Blosc 2.11
Test Run Time - Test: blosclz bitshuffle - Buffer Size: 8MB
Seconds < Lower Is Better
run1 . 8.67 |==================================================================
C-Blosc 2.11
Test: blosclz bitshuffle - Buffer Size: 16MB
MB/s > Higher Is Better
run1 . 9259.0 |================================================================
C-Blosc 2.11
Test Run Time - Test: blosclz bitshuffle - Buffer Size: 16MB
Seconds < Lower Is Better
run1 . 9.75 |==================================================================
C-Blosc 2.11
Test: blosclz bitshuffle - Buffer Size: 32MB
MB/s > Higher Is Better
run1 . 8698.3 |================================================================
C-Blosc 2.11
Test Run Time - Test: blosclz bitshuffle - Buffer Size: 32MB
Seconds < Lower Is Better
run1 . 10.37 |=================================================================
C-Blosc 2.11
Test: blosclz bitshuffle - Buffer Size: 64MB
MB/s > Higher Is Better
run1 . 7736.1 |================================================================
C-Blosc 2.11
Test Run Time - Test: blosclz bitshuffle - Buffer Size: 64MB
Seconds < Lower Is Better
run1 . 11.66 |=================================================================
C-Blosc 2.11
Test: blosclz bitshuffle - Buffer Size: 128MB
MB/s > Higher Is Better
run1 . 6532.3 |================================================================
C-Blosc 2.11
Test Run Time - Test: blosclz bitshuffle - Buffer Size: 128MB
Seconds < Lower Is Better
run1 . 13.8 |==================================================================
C-Blosc 2.11
Test: blosclz bitshuffle - Buffer Size: 256MB
MB/s > Higher Is Better
run1 . 5240.7 |================================================================
C-Blosc 2.11
Test Run Time - Test: blosclz bitshuffle - Buffer Size: 256MB
Seconds < Lower Is Better
run1 . 17.2 |==================================================================
Zstd Compression 1.5.4
Compression Level: 3 - Compression Speed
MB/s > Higher Is Better
run1 . 1480.1 |================================================================
Zstd Compression 1.5.4
Test Run Time - Compression Level: 3
Seconds < Lower Is Better
run1 . 62.04 |=================================================================
Zstd Compression 1.5.4
Compression Level: 3, Long Mode - Compression Speed
MB/s > Higher Is Better
run1 . 772.6 |=================================================================
Zstd Compression 1.5.4
Compression Level: 3, Long Mode - Decompression Speed
MB/s > Higher Is Better
run1 . 1562.0 |================================================================
Zstd Compression 1.5.4
Test Run Time - Compression Level: 3, Long Mode
Seconds < Lower Is Better
run1 . 62.57 |=================================================================
Zstd Compression 1.5.4
Compression Level: 8 - Compression Speed
MB/s > Higher Is Better
run1 . 358.3 |=================================================================
Zstd Compression 1.5.4
Compression Level: 8 - Decompression Speed
MB/s > Higher Is Better
run1 . 1679.7 |================================================================
Zstd Compression 1.5.4
Test Run Time - Compression Level: 8
Seconds < Lower Is Better
run1 . 62.73 |=================================================================
Zstd Compression 1.5.4
Compression Level: 8, Long Mode - Compression Speed
MB/s > Higher Is Better
run1 . 367.0 |=================================================================
Zstd Compression 1.5.4
Compression Level: 8, Long Mode - Decompression Speed
MB/s > Higher Is Better
run1 . 1691.0 |================================================================
Zstd Compression 1.5.4
Test Run Time - Compression Level: 8, Long Mode
Seconds < Lower Is Better
run1 . 63.01 |=================================================================
Zstd Compression 1.5.4
Compression Level: 12 - Compression Speed
MB/s > Higher Is Better
run1 . 145.8 |=================================================================
Zstd Compression 1.5.4
Compression Level: 12 - Decompression Speed
MB/s > Higher Is Better
run1 . 1712.7 |================================================================
Zstd Compression 1.5.4
Test Run Time - Compression Level: 12
Seconds < Lower Is Better
run1 . 62.15 |=================================================================
Zstd Compression 1.5.4
Compression Level: 19 - Compression Speed
MB/s > Higher Is Better
run1 . 12.6 |==================================================================
Zstd Compression 1.5.4
Compression Level: 19 - Decompression Speed
MB/s > Higher Is Better
run1 . 1487.3 |================================================================
Zstd Compression 1.5.4
Test Run Time - Compression Level: 19
Seconds < Lower Is Better
run1 . 65.19 |=================================================================
Zstd Compression 1.5.4
Compression Level: 19, Long Mode - Compression Speed
MB/s > Higher Is Better
run1 . 7.02 |==================================================================
Zstd Compression 1.5.4
Compression Level: 19, Long Mode - Decompression Speed
MB/s > Higher Is Better
run1 . 1400.9 |================================================================
Zstd Compression 1.5.4
Test Run Time - Compression Level: 19, Long Mode
Seconds < Lower Is Better
run1 . 62.12 |=================================================================
PyPerformance 1.0.0
Benchmark: 2to3
Milliseconds < Lower Is Better
run1 . 236 |===================================================================
PyPerformance 1.0.0
Test Run Time - Benchmark: 2to3
Seconds < Lower Is Better
run1 . 51 |====================================================================
PyPerformance 1.0.0
Benchmark: chaos
Milliseconds < Lower Is Better
run1 . 67.8 |==================================================================
PyPerformance 1.0.0
Test Run Time - Benchmark: chaos
Seconds < Lower Is Better
run1 . 24.91 |=================================================================
PyPerformance 1.0.0
Benchmark: crypto_pyaes
Milliseconds < Lower Is Better
run1 . 75.3 |==================================================================
PyPerformance 1.0.0
Test Run Time - Benchmark: crypto_pyaes
Seconds < Lower Is Better
run1 . 26.68 |=================================================================
PyPerformance 1.0.0
Benchmark: django_template
Milliseconds < Lower Is Better
run1 . 32.5 |==================================================================
PyPerformance 1.0.0
Test Run Time - Benchmark: django_template
Seconds < Lower Is Better
run1 . 28.4 |==================================================================
PyPerformance 1.0.0
Benchmark: float
Milliseconds < Lower Is Better
run1 . 71.8 |==================================================================
PyPerformance 1.0.0
Test Run Time - Benchmark: float
Seconds < Lower Is Better
run1 . 25.73 |=================================================================
PyPerformance 1.0.0
Benchmark: go
Milliseconds < Lower Is Better
run1 . 163 |===================================================================
PyPerformance 1.0.0
Test Run Time - Benchmark: go
Seconds < Lower Is Better
run1 . 28.63 |=================================================================
PyPerformance 1.0.0
Benchmark: json_loads
Milliseconds < Lower Is Better
run1 . 17.9 |==================================================================
PyPerformance 1.0.0
Test Run Time - Benchmark: json_loads
Seconds < Lower Is Better
run1 . 32.19 |=================================================================
PyPerformance 1.0.0
Benchmark: nbody
Milliseconds < Lower Is Better
run1 . 93.4 |==================================================================
PyPerformance 1.0.0
Test Run Time - Benchmark: nbody
Seconds < Lower Is Better
run1 . 32.59 |=================================================================
PyPerformance 1.0.0
Benchmark: pathlib
Milliseconds < Lower Is Better
run1 . 13.4 |==================================================================
PyPerformance 1.0.0
Test Run Time - Benchmark: pathlib
Seconds < Lower Is Better
run1 . 22.38 |=================================================================
PyPerformance 1.0.0
Benchmark: pickle_pure_python
Milliseconds < Lower Is Better
run1 . 294 |===================================================================
PyPerformance 1.0.0
Test Run Time - Benchmark: pickle_pure_python
Seconds < Lower Is Better
run1 . 32.94 |=================================================================
PyPerformance 1.0.0
Benchmark: python_startup
Milliseconds < Lower Is Better
run1 . 8.78 |==================================================================
PyPerformance 1.0.0
Test Run Time - Benchmark: python_startup
Seconds < Lower Is Better
run1 . 72.7 |==================================================================
PyPerformance 1.0.0
Benchmark: raytrace
Milliseconds < Lower Is Better
run1 . 315 |===================================================================
PyPerformance 1.0.0
Test Run Time - Benchmark: raytrace
Seconds < Lower Is Better
run1 . 53.49 |=================================================================
PyPerformance 1.0.0
Benchmark: regex_compile
Milliseconds < Lower Is Better
run1 . 123 |===================================================================
PyPerformance 1.0.0
Test Run Time - Benchmark: regex_compile
Seconds < Lower Is Better
run1 . 24.33 |=================================================================
PyBench 2018-02-16
Total For Average Test Times
Milliseconds < Lower Is Better
run1 . 705 |===================================================================
PyBench 2018-02-16
Test Run Time
Seconds < Lower Is Better
run1 . 16.36 |=================================================================
Cryptsetup
PBKDF2-sha512
Iterations Per Second > Higher Is Better
run1 . 1885932 |===============================================================
Cryptsetup
PBKDF2-whirlpool
Iterations Per Second > Higher Is Better
run1 . 878204 |================================================================
Cryptsetup
AES-XTS 256b Encryption
MiB/s > Higher Is Better
run1 . 4446.7 |================================================================
Cryptsetup
AES-XTS 256b Decryption
MiB/s > Higher Is Better
run1 . 4450.2 |================================================================
Cryptsetup
Serpent-XTS 256b Encryption
MiB/s > Higher Is Better
run1 . 653.5 |=================================================================
Cryptsetup
Serpent-XTS 256b Decryption
MiB/s > Higher Is Better
run1 . 674.5 |=================================================================
Cryptsetup
Twofish-XTS 256b Encryption
MiB/s > Higher Is Better
run1 . 455.1 |=================================================================
Cryptsetup
Twofish-XTS 256b Decryption
MiB/s > Higher Is Better
run1 . 457.6 |=================================================================
Cryptsetup
AES-XTS 512b Encryption
MiB/s > Higher Is Better
run1 . 4097.2 |================================================================
Cryptsetup
AES-XTS 512b Decryption
MiB/s > Higher Is Better
run1 . 4084.9 |================================================================
Cryptsetup
Serpent-XTS 512b Encryption
MiB/s > Higher Is Better
run1 . 656.4 |=================================================================
Cryptsetup
Twofish-XTS 512b Encryption
MiB/s > Higher Is Better
run1 . 456.0 |=================================================================
Cryptsetup
Twofish-XTS 512b Decryption
MiB/s > Higher Is Better
run1 . 457.4 |=================================================================
Cryptsetup
Serpent-XTS 512b Decryption
MiB/s > Higher Is Better
run1 . 673.7 |=================================================================
Cryptsetup
Test Run Time
Seconds < Lower Is Better
run1 . 37.35 |=================================================================
Timed Apache Compilation 2.4.41
Time To Compile
Seconds < Lower Is Better
run1 . 19.94 |=================================================================
Timed Apache Compilation 2.4.41
Test Run Time
Seconds < Lower Is Better
run1 . 19.94 |=================================================================
Timed PHP Compilation 8.1.9
Time To Compile
Seconds < Lower Is Better
run1 . 63.13 |=================================================================
Timed PHP Compilation 8.1.9
Test Run Time
Seconds < Lower Is Better
run1 . 63.13 |=================================================================
Timed Eigen Compilation 3.3.9
Time To Compile
Seconds < Lower Is Better
run1 . 64.08 |=================================================================
Timed Eigen Compilation 3.3.9
Test Run Time
Seconds < Lower Is Better
run1 . 64.08 |=================================================================
Timed Linux Kernel Compilation 6.1
Build: defconfig
Seconds < Lower Is Better
Timed Linux Kernel Compilation 6.1
Test Run Time - Build: defconfig
Seconds < Lower Is Better
run1 . 1.82 |==================================================================
Timed Linux Kernel Compilation 6.1
Build: allmodconfig
Seconds < Lower Is Better
Timed Linux Kernel Compilation 6.1
Test Run Time - Build: allmodconfig
Seconds < Lower Is Better
run1 . 2.21 |==================================================================
Timed ImageMagick Compilation 6.9.0
Time To Compile
Seconds < Lower Is Better
run1 . 25.71 |=================================================================
Timed ImageMagick Compilation 6.9.0
Test Run Time
Seconds < Lower Is Better
run1 . 25.71 |=================================================================
Timed GCC Compilation 13.2
Seconds < Lower Is Better
Timed GCC Compilation 13.2
Test Run Time
Seconds < Lower Is Better
run1 . 0.01 |==================================================================
Timed GDB GNU Debugger Compilation 10.2
Seconds < Lower Is Better
Timed GDB GNU Debugger Compilation 10.2
Test Run Time
Seconds < Lower Is Better
run1 . 61.92 |=================================================================
Timed LLVM Compilation 16.0
Build System: Ninja
Seconds < Lower Is Better
run1 . 805.00 |================================================================
Timed LLVM Compilation 16.0
Test Run Time - Build System: Ninja
Seconds < Lower Is Better
run1 . 805 |===================================================================
Timed LLVM Compilation 16.0
Build System: Unix Makefiles
Seconds < Lower Is Better
run1 . 822.02 |================================================================
Timed LLVM Compilation 16.0
Test Run Time - Build System: Unix Makefiles
Seconds < Lower Is Better
run1 . 822.02 |================================================================
Timed FFmpeg Compilation 6.1
Time To Compile
Seconds < Lower Is Better
run1 . 51.84 |=================================================================
Timed FFmpeg Compilation 6.1
Test Run Time
Seconds < Lower Is Better
run1 . 51.84 |=================================================================
Build2 0.15
Time To Compile
Seconds < Lower Is Better
run1 . 160.63 |================================================================
Build2 0.15
Test Run Time
Seconds < Lower Is Better
run1 . 160.63 |================================================================
Timed CPython Compilation 3.10.6
Build Configuration: Default
Seconds < Lower Is Better
run1 . 18.90 |=================================================================
Timed CPython Compilation 3.10.6
Test Run Time - Build Configuration: Default
Seconds < Lower Is Better
run1 . 18.9 |==================================================================
Timed CPython Compilation 3.10.6
Build Configuration: Released Build, PGO + LTO Optimized
Seconds < Lower Is Better
run1 . 247.28 |================================================================
Timed CPython Compilation 3.10.6
Test Run Time - Build Configuration: Released Build, PGO + LTO Optimized
Seconds < Lower Is Better
run1 . 247.28 |================================================================
Timed Godot Game Engine Compilation 4.0
Time To Compile
Seconds < Lower Is Better
run1 . 397.07 |================================================================
Timed Godot Game Engine Compilation 4.0
Test Run Time
Seconds < Lower Is Better
run1 . 397.07 |================================================================
Timed Erlang/OTP Compilation 25.0
Time To Compile
Seconds < Lower Is Better
run1 . 96.57 |=================================================================
Timed Erlang/OTP Compilation 25.0
Test Run Time
Seconds < Lower Is Better
run1 . 96.58 |=================================================================
Timed Node.js Compilation 19.8.1
Time To Compile
Seconds < Lower Is Better
run1 . 677.89 |================================================================
Timed Node.js Compilation 19.8.1
Test Run Time
Seconds < Lower Is Better
run1 . 677.89 |================================================================
Timed Mesa Compilation 21.0
Seconds < Lower Is Better
Timed Mesa Compilation 21.0
Test Run Time
Seconds < Lower Is Better
run1 . 0.01 |==================================================================
Timed Gem5 Compilation 23.0.1
Time To Compile
Seconds < Lower Is Better
run1 . 575.76 |================================================================
Timed Gem5 Compilation 23.0.1
Test Run Time
Seconds < Lower Is Better
run1 . 575.75 |================================================================
ACES DGEMM 1.0
Sustained Floating-Point Rate
GFLOP/s > Higher Is Better
run1 . 3.000488 |==============================================================
ACES DGEMM 1.0
Test Run Time
Seconds < Lower Is Better
run1 . 77.37 |=================================================================
ArrayFire 3.9
Test: BLAS CPU
GFLOPS > Higher Is Better
run1 . 33.99 |=================================================================
ArrayFire 3.9
Test Run Time - Test: BLAS CPU
Seconds < Lower Is Better
run1 . 84.98 |=================================================================
Algebraic Multi-Grid Benchmark 1.2
Figure Of Merit > Higher Is Better
run1 . 216181807 |=============================================================
Algebraic Multi-Grid Benchmark 1.2
Test Run Time
Seconds < Lower Is Better
run1 . 32.98 |=================================================================
HPC Challenge 1.5.0
Test / Class: G-HPL
GFLOPS > Higher Is Better
run1 . 44.65 |=================================================================
HPC Challenge 1.5.0
Test Run Time - Test / Class: G-HPL
Seconds < Lower Is Better
run1 . 2666.72 |===============================================================