nuc1

Intel Core i5-13500H testing with a Simply NUC NUC13OXi5B (1.08 BIOS) and Intel RPL-P 31GB on Ubuntu 22.04 via the Phoronix Test Suite.

Compare your own system(s) to this result file with the Phoronix Test Suite by running the command: phoronix-test-suite benchmark 2402212-NE-NUC14563458
Jump To Table - Results

Statistics

Remove Outliers Before Calculating Averages

Graph Settings

Prefer Vertical Bar Graphs

Multi-Way Comparison

Condense Multi-Option Tests Into Single Result Graphs
Condense Test Profiles With Multiple Version Results Into Single Result Graphs

Table

Show Detailed System Result Table

Run Management

Result
Identifier
View Logs
Performance Per
Dollar
Date
Run
  Test
  Duration
run1
February 20
  7 Hours, 57 Minutes
Only show results matching title/arguments (delimit multiple options with a comma):
Do not show results matching title/arguments (delimit multiple options with a comma):

nuc1 Intel Core i5-13500H testing with a Simply NUC NUC13OXi5B (1.08 BIOS) and Intel RPL-P 31GB on Ubuntu 22.04 via the Phoronix Test Suite. run1: Processor: Intel Core i5-13500H @ 4.70GHz (12 Cores / 16 Threads), Motherboard: Simply NUC NUC13OXi5B (1.08 BIOS), Chipset: Intel Alder Lake PCH, Memory: 2 x 16 GB DDR5-5200MT/s Kingston, Disk: 1024GB KINGSTON OM8PGP41024Q-A0, Graphics: Intel RPL-P 31GB (1450MHz), Audio: Realtek ALC269VB, Monitor: DELL ST2421L, Network: Intel Device 125c + Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX210/AX211/AX411 OS: Ubuntu 22.04, Kernel: 6.5.0-18-generic (x86_64), Desktop: KDE Plasma 5.24.7, Display Server: X Server 1.21.1.4, OpenGL: 4.6 Mesa 23.0.4-0ubuntu1~22.04.1, Vulkan: 1.3.238, Compiler: GCC 11.4.0, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 1920x1080 simdjson 2.0 Throughput Test: PartialTweets GB/s > Higher Is Better run1 . 4.35 |================================================================== simdjson 2.0 Test Run Time - Throughput Test: PartialTweets Seconds < Lower Is Better run1 . 69.01 |================================================================= simdjson 2.0 Throughput Test: LargeRandom GB/s > Higher Is Better run1 . 1.26 |================================================================== simdjson 2.0 Test Run Time - Throughput Test: LargeRandom Seconds < Lower Is Better run1 . 50.26 |================================================================= simdjson 2.0 Throughput Test: Kostya GB/s > Higher Is Better run1 . 3.69 |================================================================== simdjson 2.0 Test Run Time - Throughput Test: Kostya Seconds < Lower Is Better run1 . 55.77 |================================================================= simdjson 2.0 Throughput Test: DistinctUserID GB/s > Higher Is Better run1 . 5.18 |================================================================== simdjson 2.0 Test Run Time - Throughput Test: DistinctUserID Seconds < Lower Is Better run1 . 67.67 |================================================================= simdjson 2.0 Throughput Test: TopTweet GB/s > Higher Is Better run1 . 5.11 |================================================================== simdjson 2.0 Test Run Time - Throughput Test: TopTweet Seconds < Lower Is Better run1 . 67.32 |================================================================= SQLite Speedtest 3.30 Timed Time - Size 1,000 Seconds < Lower Is Better run1 . 50.03 |================================================================= SQLite Speedtest 3.30 Test Run Time Seconds < Lower Is Better run1 . 50.07 |================================================================= Node.js V8 Web Tooling Benchmark runs/s > Higher Is Better run1 . 14.71 |================================================================= Node.js V8 Web Tooling Benchmark Test Run Time Seconds < Lower Is Better run1 . 60.76 |================================================================= Git Time To Complete Common Git Commands Seconds < Lower Is Better run1 . 48.73 |================================================================= Git Test Run Time Seconds < Lower Is Better run1 . 48.73 |================================================================= C-Blosc 2.11 Test: blosclz shuffle - Buffer Size: 8MB MB/s > Higher Is Better run1 . 11355.9 |=============================================================== C-Blosc 2.11 Test Run Time - Test: blosclz shuffle - Buffer Size: 8MB Seconds < Lower Is Better run1 . 7.95 |================================================================== C-Blosc 2.11 Test: blosclz shuffle - Buffer Size: 16MB MB/s > Higher Is Better run1 . 9926.0 |================================================================ C-Blosc 2.11 Test Run Time - Test: blosclz shuffle - Buffer Size: 16MB Seconds < Lower Is Better run1 . 9.09 |================================================================== C-Blosc 2.11 Test: blosclz shuffle - Buffer Size: 32MB MB/s > Higher Is Better run1 . 9244.7 |================================================================ C-Blosc 2.11 Test Run Time - Test: blosclz shuffle - Buffer Size: 32MB Seconds < Lower Is Better run1 . 9.76 |================================================================== C-Blosc 2.11 Test: blosclz shuffle - Buffer Size: 64MB MB/s > Higher Is Better run1 . 8256.5 |================================================================ C-Blosc 2.11 Test Run Time - Test: blosclz shuffle - Buffer Size: 64MB Seconds < Lower Is Better run1 . 10.92 |================================================================= C-Blosc 2.11 Test: blosclz shuffle - Buffer Size: 128MB MB/s > Higher Is Better run1 . 7102.8 |================================================================ C-Blosc 2.11 Test Run Time - Test: blosclz shuffle - Buffer Size: 128MB Seconds < Lower Is Better run1 . 12.7 |================================================================== C-Blosc 2.11 Test: blosclz shuffle - Buffer Size: 256MB MB/s > Higher Is Better run1 . 5516.8 |================================================================ C-Blosc 2.11 Test Run Time - Test: blosclz shuffle - Buffer Size: 256MB Seconds < Lower Is Better run1 . 16.35 |================================================================= C-Blosc 2.11 Test: blosclz noshuffle - Buffer Size: 8MB MB/s > Higher Is Better run1 . 7866.9 |================================================================ C-Blosc 2.11 Test Run Time - Test: blosclz noshuffle - Buffer Size: 8MB Seconds < Lower Is Better run1 . 11.47 |================================================================= C-Blosc 2.11 Test: blosclz noshuffle - Buffer Size: 16MB MB/s > Higher Is Better run1 . 5013.1 |================================================================ C-Blosc 2.11 Test Run Time - Test: blosclz noshuffle - Buffer Size: 16MB Seconds < Lower Is Better run1 . 17.99 |================================================================= C-Blosc 2.11 Test: blosclz noshuffle - Buffer Size: 32MB MB/s > Higher Is Better run1 . 4320.0 |================================================================ C-Blosc 2.11 Test Run Time - Test: blosclz noshuffle - Buffer Size: 32MB Seconds < Lower Is Better run1 . 20.88 |================================================================= C-Blosc 2.11 Test: blosclz noshuffle - Buffer Size: 64MB MB/s > Higher Is Better run1 . 4121.5 |================================================================ C-Blosc 2.11 Test Run Time - Test: blosclz noshuffle - Buffer Size: 64MB Seconds < Lower Is Better run1 . 21.88 |================================================================= C-Blosc 2.11 Test: blosclz noshuffle - Buffer Size: 128MB MB/s > Higher Is Better run1 . 3852.3 |================================================================ C-Blosc 2.11 Test Run Time - Test: blosclz noshuffle - Buffer Size: 128MB Seconds < Lower Is Better run1 . 23.41 |================================================================= C-Blosc 2.11 Test: blosclz noshuffle - Buffer Size: 256MB MB/s > Higher Is Better run1 . 3499.9 |================================================================ C-Blosc 2.11 Test Run Time - Test: blosclz noshuffle - Buffer Size: 256MB Seconds < Lower Is Better run1 . 25.76 |================================================================= C-Blosc 2.11 Test: blosclz bitshuffle - Buffer Size: 8MB MB/s > Higher Is Better run1 . 10405.6 |=============================================================== C-Blosc 2.11 Test Run Time - Test: blosclz bitshuffle - Buffer Size: 8MB Seconds < Lower Is Better run1 . 8.67 |================================================================== C-Blosc 2.11 Test: blosclz bitshuffle - Buffer Size: 16MB MB/s > Higher Is Better run1 . 9259.0 |================================================================ C-Blosc 2.11 Test Run Time - Test: blosclz bitshuffle - Buffer Size: 16MB Seconds < Lower Is Better run1 . 9.75 |================================================================== C-Blosc 2.11 Test: blosclz bitshuffle - Buffer Size: 32MB MB/s > Higher Is Better run1 . 8698.3 |================================================================ C-Blosc 2.11 Test Run Time - Test: blosclz bitshuffle - Buffer Size: 32MB Seconds < Lower Is Better run1 . 10.37 |================================================================= C-Blosc 2.11 Test: blosclz bitshuffle - Buffer Size: 64MB MB/s > Higher Is Better run1 . 7736.1 |================================================================ C-Blosc 2.11 Test Run Time - Test: blosclz bitshuffle - Buffer Size: 64MB Seconds < Lower Is Better run1 . 11.66 |================================================================= C-Blosc 2.11 Test: blosclz bitshuffle - Buffer Size: 128MB MB/s > Higher Is Better run1 . 6532.3 |================================================================ C-Blosc 2.11 Test Run Time - Test: blosclz bitshuffle - Buffer Size: 128MB Seconds < Lower Is Better run1 . 13.8 |================================================================== C-Blosc 2.11 Test: blosclz bitshuffle - Buffer Size: 256MB MB/s > Higher Is Better run1 . 5240.7 |================================================================ C-Blosc 2.11 Test Run Time - Test: blosclz bitshuffle - Buffer Size: 256MB Seconds < Lower Is Better run1 . 17.2 |================================================================== Zstd Compression 1.5.4 Compression Level: 3 - Compression Speed MB/s > Higher Is Better run1 . 1480.1 |================================================================ Zstd Compression 1.5.4 Test Run Time - Compression Level: 3 Seconds < Lower Is Better run1 . 62.04 |================================================================= Zstd Compression 1.5.4 Compression Level: 3, Long Mode - Compression Speed MB/s > Higher Is Better run1 . 772.6 |================================================================= Zstd Compression 1.5.4 Compression Level: 3, Long Mode - Decompression Speed MB/s > Higher Is Better run1 . 1562.0 |================================================================ Zstd Compression 1.5.4 Test Run Time - Compression Level: 3, Long Mode Seconds < Lower Is Better run1 . 62.57 |================================================================= Zstd Compression 1.5.4 Compression Level: 8 - Compression Speed MB/s > Higher Is Better run1 . 358.3 |================================================================= Zstd Compression 1.5.4 Compression Level: 8 - Decompression Speed MB/s > Higher Is Better run1 . 1679.7 |================================================================ Zstd Compression 1.5.4 Test Run Time - Compression Level: 8 Seconds < Lower Is Better run1 . 62.73 |================================================================= Zstd Compression 1.5.4 Compression Level: 8, Long Mode - Compression Speed MB/s > Higher Is Better run1 . 367.0 |================================================================= Zstd Compression 1.5.4 Compression Level: 8, Long Mode - Decompression Speed MB/s > Higher Is Better run1 . 1691.0 |================================================================ Zstd Compression 1.5.4 Test Run Time - Compression Level: 8, Long Mode Seconds < Lower Is Better run1 . 63.01 |================================================================= Zstd Compression 1.5.4 Compression Level: 12 - Compression Speed MB/s > Higher Is Better run1 . 145.8 |================================================================= Zstd Compression 1.5.4 Compression Level: 12 - Decompression Speed MB/s > Higher Is Better run1 . 1712.7 |================================================================ Zstd Compression 1.5.4 Test Run Time - Compression Level: 12 Seconds < Lower Is Better run1 . 62.15 |================================================================= Zstd Compression 1.5.4 Compression Level: 19 - Compression Speed MB/s > Higher Is Better run1 . 12.6 |================================================================== Zstd Compression 1.5.4 Compression Level: 19 - Decompression Speed MB/s > Higher Is Better run1 . 1487.3 |================================================================ Zstd Compression 1.5.4 Test Run Time - Compression Level: 19 Seconds < Lower Is Better run1 . 65.19 |================================================================= Zstd Compression 1.5.4 Compression Level: 19, Long Mode - Compression Speed MB/s > Higher Is Better run1 . 7.02 |================================================================== Zstd Compression 1.5.4 Compression Level: 19, Long Mode - Decompression Speed MB/s > Higher Is Better run1 . 1400.9 |================================================================ Zstd Compression 1.5.4 Test Run Time - Compression Level: 19, Long Mode Seconds < Lower Is Better run1 . 62.12 |================================================================= PyPerformance 1.0.0 Benchmark: 2to3 Milliseconds < Lower Is Better run1 . 236 |=================================================================== PyPerformance 1.0.0 Test Run Time - Benchmark: 2to3 Seconds < Lower Is Better run1 . 51 |==================================================================== PyPerformance 1.0.0 Benchmark: chaos Milliseconds < Lower Is Better run1 . 67.8 |================================================================== PyPerformance 1.0.0 Test Run Time - Benchmark: chaos Seconds < Lower Is Better run1 . 24.91 |================================================================= PyPerformance 1.0.0 Benchmark: crypto_pyaes Milliseconds < Lower Is Better run1 . 75.3 |================================================================== PyPerformance 1.0.0 Test Run Time - Benchmark: crypto_pyaes Seconds < Lower Is Better run1 . 26.68 |================================================================= PyPerformance 1.0.0 Benchmark: django_template Milliseconds < Lower Is Better run1 . 32.5 |================================================================== PyPerformance 1.0.0 Test Run Time - Benchmark: django_template Seconds < Lower Is Better run1 . 28.4 |================================================================== PyPerformance 1.0.0 Benchmark: float Milliseconds < Lower Is Better run1 . 71.8 |================================================================== PyPerformance 1.0.0 Test Run Time - Benchmark: float Seconds < Lower Is Better run1 . 25.73 |================================================================= PyPerformance 1.0.0 Benchmark: go Milliseconds < Lower Is Better run1 . 163 |=================================================================== PyPerformance 1.0.0 Test Run Time - Benchmark: go Seconds < Lower Is Better run1 . 28.63 |================================================================= PyPerformance 1.0.0 Benchmark: json_loads Milliseconds < Lower Is Better run1 . 17.9 |================================================================== PyPerformance 1.0.0 Test Run Time - Benchmark: json_loads Seconds < Lower Is Better run1 . 32.19 |================================================================= PyPerformance 1.0.0 Benchmark: nbody Milliseconds < Lower Is Better run1 . 93.4 |================================================================== PyPerformance 1.0.0 Test Run Time - Benchmark: nbody Seconds < Lower Is Better run1 . 32.59 |================================================================= PyPerformance 1.0.0 Benchmark: pathlib Milliseconds < Lower Is Better run1 . 13.4 |================================================================== PyPerformance 1.0.0 Test Run Time - Benchmark: pathlib Seconds < Lower Is Better run1 . 22.38 |================================================================= PyPerformance 1.0.0 Benchmark: pickle_pure_python Milliseconds < Lower Is Better run1 . 294 |=================================================================== PyPerformance 1.0.0 Test Run Time - Benchmark: pickle_pure_python Seconds < Lower Is Better run1 . 32.94 |================================================================= PyPerformance 1.0.0 Benchmark: python_startup Milliseconds < Lower Is Better run1 . 8.78 |================================================================== PyPerformance 1.0.0 Test Run Time - Benchmark: python_startup Seconds < Lower Is Better run1 . 72.7 |================================================================== PyPerformance 1.0.0 Benchmark: raytrace Milliseconds < Lower Is Better run1 . 315 |=================================================================== PyPerformance 1.0.0 Test Run Time - Benchmark: raytrace Seconds < Lower Is Better run1 . 53.49 |================================================================= PyPerformance 1.0.0 Benchmark: regex_compile Milliseconds < Lower Is Better run1 . 123 |=================================================================== PyPerformance 1.0.0 Test Run Time - Benchmark: regex_compile Seconds < Lower Is Better run1 . 24.33 |================================================================= PyBench 2018-02-16 Total For Average Test Times Milliseconds < Lower Is Better run1 . 705 |=================================================================== PyBench 2018-02-16 Test Run Time Seconds < Lower Is Better run1 . 16.36 |================================================================= Cryptsetup PBKDF2-sha512 Iterations Per Second > Higher Is Better run1 . 1885932 |=============================================================== Cryptsetup PBKDF2-whirlpool Iterations Per Second > Higher Is Better run1 . 878204 |================================================================ Cryptsetup AES-XTS 256b Encryption MiB/s > Higher Is Better run1 . 4446.7 |================================================================ Cryptsetup AES-XTS 256b Decryption MiB/s > Higher Is Better run1 . 4450.2 |================================================================ Cryptsetup Serpent-XTS 256b Encryption MiB/s > Higher Is Better run1 . 653.5 |================================================================= Cryptsetup Serpent-XTS 256b Decryption MiB/s > Higher Is Better run1 . 674.5 |================================================================= Cryptsetup Twofish-XTS 256b Encryption MiB/s > Higher Is Better run1 . 455.1 |================================================================= Cryptsetup Twofish-XTS 256b Decryption MiB/s > Higher Is Better run1 . 457.6 |================================================================= Cryptsetup AES-XTS 512b Encryption MiB/s > Higher Is Better run1 . 4097.2 |================================================================ Cryptsetup AES-XTS 512b Decryption MiB/s > Higher Is Better run1 . 4084.9 |================================================================ Cryptsetup Serpent-XTS 512b Encryption MiB/s > Higher Is Better run1 . 656.4 |================================================================= Cryptsetup Twofish-XTS 512b Encryption MiB/s > Higher Is Better run1 . 456.0 |================================================================= Cryptsetup Twofish-XTS 512b Decryption MiB/s > Higher Is Better run1 . 457.4 |================================================================= Cryptsetup Serpent-XTS 512b Decryption MiB/s > Higher Is Better run1 . 673.7 |================================================================= Cryptsetup Test Run Time Seconds < Lower Is Better run1 . 37.35 |================================================================= Timed Apache Compilation 2.4.41 Time To Compile Seconds < Lower Is Better run1 . 19.94 |================================================================= Timed Apache Compilation 2.4.41 Test Run Time Seconds < Lower Is Better run1 . 19.94 |================================================================= Timed PHP Compilation 8.1.9 Time To Compile Seconds < Lower Is Better run1 . 63.13 |================================================================= Timed PHP Compilation 8.1.9 Test Run Time Seconds < Lower Is Better run1 . 63.13 |================================================================= Timed Eigen Compilation 3.3.9 Time To Compile Seconds < Lower Is Better run1 . 64.08 |================================================================= Timed Eigen Compilation 3.3.9 Test Run Time Seconds < Lower Is Better run1 . 64.08 |================================================================= Timed Linux Kernel Compilation 6.1 Build: defconfig Seconds < Lower Is Better Timed Linux Kernel Compilation 6.1 Test Run Time - Build: defconfig Seconds < Lower Is Better run1 . 1.82 |================================================================== Timed Linux Kernel Compilation 6.1 Build: allmodconfig Seconds < Lower Is Better Timed Linux Kernel Compilation 6.1 Test Run Time - Build: allmodconfig Seconds < Lower Is Better run1 . 2.21 |================================================================== Timed ImageMagick Compilation 6.9.0 Time To Compile Seconds < Lower Is Better run1 . 25.71 |================================================================= Timed ImageMagick Compilation 6.9.0 Test Run Time Seconds < Lower Is Better run1 . 25.71 |================================================================= Timed GCC Compilation 13.2 Seconds < Lower Is Better Timed GCC Compilation 13.2 Test Run Time Seconds < Lower Is Better run1 . 0.01 |================================================================== Timed GDB GNU Debugger Compilation 10.2 Seconds < Lower Is Better Timed GDB GNU Debugger Compilation 10.2 Test Run Time Seconds < Lower Is Better run1 . 61.92 |================================================================= Timed LLVM Compilation 16.0 Build System: Ninja Seconds < Lower Is Better run1 . 805.00 |================================================================ Timed LLVM Compilation 16.0 Test Run Time - Build System: Ninja Seconds < Lower Is Better run1 . 805 |=================================================================== Timed LLVM Compilation 16.0 Build System: Unix Makefiles Seconds < Lower Is Better run1 . 822.02 |================================================================ Timed LLVM Compilation 16.0 Test Run Time - Build System: Unix Makefiles Seconds < Lower Is Better run1 . 822.02 |================================================================ Timed FFmpeg Compilation 6.1 Time To Compile Seconds < Lower Is Better run1 . 51.84 |================================================================= Timed FFmpeg Compilation 6.1 Test Run Time Seconds < Lower Is Better run1 . 51.84 |================================================================= Build2 0.15 Time To Compile Seconds < Lower Is Better run1 . 160.63 |================================================================ Build2 0.15 Test Run Time Seconds < Lower Is Better run1 . 160.63 |================================================================ Timed CPython Compilation 3.10.6 Build Configuration: Default Seconds < Lower Is Better run1 . 18.90 |================================================================= Timed CPython Compilation 3.10.6 Test Run Time - Build Configuration: Default Seconds < Lower Is Better run1 . 18.9 |================================================================== Timed CPython Compilation 3.10.6 Build Configuration: Released Build, PGO + LTO Optimized Seconds < Lower Is Better run1 . 247.28 |================================================================ Timed CPython Compilation 3.10.6 Test Run Time - Build Configuration: Released Build, PGO + LTO Optimized Seconds < Lower Is Better run1 . 247.28 |================================================================ Timed Godot Game Engine Compilation 4.0 Time To Compile Seconds < Lower Is Better run1 . 397.07 |================================================================ Timed Godot Game Engine Compilation 4.0 Test Run Time Seconds < Lower Is Better run1 . 397.07 |================================================================ Timed Erlang/OTP Compilation 25.0 Time To Compile Seconds < Lower Is Better run1 . 96.57 |================================================================= Timed Erlang/OTP Compilation 25.0 Test Run Time Seconds < Lower Is Better run1 . 96.58 |================================================================= Timed Node.js Compilation 19.8.1 Time To Compile Seconds < Lower Is Better run1 . 677.89 |================================================================ Timed Node.js Compilation 19.8.1 Test Run Time Seconds < Lower Is Better run1 . 677.89 |================================================================ Timed Mesa Compilation 21.0 Seconds < Lower Is Better Timed Mesa Compilation 21.0 Test Run Time Seconds < Lower Is Better run1 . 0.01 |================================================================== Timed Gem5 Compilation 23.0.1 Time To Compile Seconds < Lower Is Better run1 . 575.76 |================================================================ Timed Gem5 Compilation 23.0.1 Test Run Time Seconds < Lower Is Better run1 . 575.75 |================================================================ ACES DGEMM 1.0 Sustained Floating-Point Rate GFLOP/s > Higher Is Better run1 . 3.000488 |============================================================== ACES DGEMM 1.0 Test Run Time Seconds < Lower Is Better run1 . 77.37 |================================================================= ArrayFire 3.9 Test: BLAS CPU GFLOPS > Higher Is Better run1 . 33.99 |================================================================= ArrayFire 3.9 Test Run Time - Test: BLAS CPU Seconds < Lower Is Better run1 . 84.98 |================================================================= Algebraic Multi-Grid Benchmark 1.2 Figure Of Merit > Higher Is Better run1 . 216181807 |============================================================= Algebraic Multi-Grid Benchmark 1.2 Test Run Time Seconds < Lower Is Better run1 . 32.98 |================================================================= HPC Challenge 1.5.0 Test / Class: G-HPL GFLOPS > Higher Is Better run1 . 44.65 |================================================================= HPC Challenge 1.5.0 Test Run Time - Test / Class: G-HPL Seconds < Lower Is Better run1 . 2666.72 |===============================================================