amazon testing on Amazon Linux 2 via the Phoronix Test Suite.
Compare your own system(s) to this result file with the
Phoronix Test Suite by running the command:
phoronix-test-suite benchmark 2402204-NE-C7G4XLARG95
c7g.4xlarge,
"Stream 2013-01-17 - Type: Copy",
Higher Results Are Better
"c7g.4xlarge",238126.7,237780.8,238126.7,238881.1,238736.6
"Stream 2013-01-17 - Type: Scale",
Higher Results Are Better
"c7g.4xlarge",238915.1,238660.2,239127.9,238915.1,238160.5
"Stream 2013-01-17 - Type: Triad",
Higher Results Are Better
"c7g.4xlarge",224379.3,224424.3,224364.3,223363.6,224129.5
"Stream 2013-01-17 - Type: Add",
Higher Results Are Better
"c7g.4xlarge",226714,227077.1,226372.4,227082.3,227102.8
"CacheBench - Test: Read",
Higher Results Are Better
"c7g.4xlarge",9906.875738,9906.977425,9906.969032
"CacheBench - Test: Write",
Higher Results Are Better
"c7g.4xlarge",37842.483343,37430.251457,37512.144197
"CacheBench - Test: Read / Modify / Write",
Higher Results Are Better
"c7g.4xlarge",65201.389966,62930.386142,62807.335778
"C-Ray 1.1 - Total Time - 4K, 16 Rays Per Pixel",
Lower Results Are Better
"c7g.4xlarge",37.708,37.629,37.733
"LZ4 Compression 1.9.4 - Compression Level: 1 - Compression Speed",
Higher Results Are Better
"c7g.4xlarge",601.23,601.25,601.49
"LZ4 Compression 1.9.4 - Compression Level: 1 - Decompression Speed",
Higher Results Are Better
"c7g.4xlarge",3336.5,3337,3337.3
"LZ4 Compression 1.9.4 - Compression Level: 3 - Compression Speed",
Higher Results Are Better
"c7g.4xlarge",91.27,86.56,85.45,91.07,86.55,91.47,91.23,86.6,91.17,85.36,85.63,86.69,91.24,85.4,86.31
"LZ4 Compression 1.9.4 - Compression Level: 3 - Decompression Speed",
Higher Results Are Better
"c7g.4xlarge",2992,2993.2,2991.8,2993.3,2993.7,2992.1,2992.5,2993,2993.1,2993.7,2992.1,2993.2,2992.4,2992.7,2993.4
"LZ4 Compression 1.9.4 - Compression Level: 9 - Compression Speed",
Higher Results Are Better
"c7g.4xlarge",29.84,28.3,29.91,29.77,29.85
"LZ4 Compression 1.9.4 - Compression Level: 9 - Decompression Speed",
Higher Results Are Better
"c7g.4xlarge",3059.4,3061,3058.7,3059.1,3058.3
"OpenSSL 3.1 - Algorithm: SHA256",
Higher Results Are Better
"c7g.4xlarge",12914351370,12885995070,12915427110
"OpenSSL 3.1 - Algorithm: SHA512",
Higher Results Are Better
"c7g.4xlarge",7623158340,7645390810,7645346000
"OpenSSL 3.1 - Algorithm: RSA4096",
Higher Results Are Better
"c7g.4xlarge",2505.5,2542.5,2541.9
"OpenSSL 3.1 - Algorithm: RSA4096",
Higher Results Are Better
"c7g.4xlarge",168598.8,175451.3,175202.5
"OpenSSL 3.1 - Algorithm: ChaCha20",
Higher Results Are Better
"c7g.4xlarge",25841943070,25839086250,25833669700
"OpenSSL 3.1 - Algorithm: AES-128-GCM",
Higher Results Are Better
"c7g.4xlarge",83476157240,83463058230,83520214900
"OpenSSL 3.1 - Algorithm: AES-256-GCM",
Higher Results Are Better
"c7g.4xlarge",71131973770,71125809290,71116152830
"OpenSSL 3.1 - Algorithm: ChaCha20-Poly1305",
Higher Results Are Better
"c7g.4xlarge",18634387180,18630620230,18630985590