testecompressaodebian1xenserver Xen HVM domU 4.13 testing on Debian 11 via the Phoronix Test Suite. 8 x Intel Xeon E5-2620 v4: Processor: 8 x Intel Xeon E5-2620 v4 (8 Cores), Motherboard: Xen HVM domU v4.13, Chipset: Intel 440FX 82441FX PMC, Memory: 3584MB, Disk: 57GB, Graphics: bochs-drmdrmfb OS: Debian 11, Kernel: 5.10.0-28-amd64 (x86_64), Desktop: GNOME Shell 3.38.6, Display Server: X Server + Wayland, Compiler: GCC 10.2.1 20210110, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 1024x768, System Layer: Xen HVM domU 4.13 RAR Compression 6.0.2 Linux Source Tree Archiving To RAR Seconds < Lower Is Better 8 x Intel Xeon E5-2620 v4 . 2130.31 |========================================== lzbench 1.8 Test: Brotli 0 - Process: Decompression MB/s > Higher Is Better 8 x Intel Xeon E5-2620 v4 . 427 |============================================== lzbench 1.8 Test: Brotli 0 - Process: Compression MB/s > Higher Is Better 8 x Intel Xeon E5-2620 v4 . 311 |============================================== lzbench 1.8 Test: Libdeflate 1 - Process: Compression MB/s > Higher Is Better 8 x Intel Xeon E5-2620 v4 . 152 |============================================== lzbench 1.8 Test: Brotli 2 - Process: Decompression MB/s > Higher Is Better 8 x Intel Xeon E5-2620 v4 . 517 |============================================== lzbench 1.8 Test: Brotli 2 - Process: Compression MB/s > Higher Is Better 8 x Intel Xeon E5-2620 v4 . 121 |============================================== lzbench 1.8 Test: Crush 0 - Process: Decompression MB/s > Higher Is Better 8 x Intel Xeon E5-2620 v4 . 197.66 |=========================================== lzbench 1.8 Test: Crush 0 - Process: Compression MB/s > Higher Is Better 8 x Intel Xeon E5-2620 v4 . 23.77 |============================================ lzbench 1.8 Test: Zstd 1 - Process: Decompression MB/s > Higher Is Better 8 x Intel Xeon E5-2620 v4 . 910 |============================================== lzbench 1.8 Test: Zstd 1 - Process: Compression MB/s > Higher Is Better 8 x Intel Xeon E5-2620 v4 . 228 |============================================== lzbench 1.8 Test: XZ 0 - Process: Decompression MB/s > Higher Is Better 8 x Intel Xeon E5-2620 v4 . 63 |=============================================== lzbench 1.8 Test: XZ 0 - Process: Compression MB/s > Higher Is Better 8 x Intel Xeon E5-2620 v4 . 20 |=============================================== XZ Compression 5.2.4 Compressing ubuntu-16.04.3-server-i386.img, Compression Level 9 Seconds < Lower Is Better 8 x Intel Xeon E5-2620 v4 . 355.06 |=========================================== lzbench 1.8 Test: Zstd 8 - Process: Decompression MB/s > Higher Is Better 8 x Intel Xeon E5-2620 v4 . 755 |============================================== lzbench 1.8 Test: Zstd 8 - Process: Compression MB/s > Higher Is Better 8 x Intel Xeon E5-2620 v4 . 36 |=============================================== Gzip Compression Linux Source Tree Archiving To .tar.gz Seconds < Lower Is Better 8 x Intel Xeon E5-2620 v4 . 191.22 |=========================================== Zstd Compression 1.5.4 Compression Level: 19 - Decompression Speed MB/s > Higher Is Better 8 x Intel Xeon E5-2620 v4 . 857.1 |============================================ Zstd Compression 1.5.4 Compression Level: 19 - Compression Speed MB/s > Higher Is Better 8 x Intel Xeon E5-2620 v4 . 9.28 |============================================= Zstd Compression 1.5.4 Compression Level: 19, Long Mode - Decompression Speed MB/s > Higher Is Better 8 x Intel Xeon E5-2620 v4 . 804.1 |============================================ Zstd Compression 1.5.4 Compression Level: 19, Long Mode - Compression Speed MB/s > Higher Is Better 8 x Intel Xeon E5-2620 v4 . 5.48 |============================================= 7-Zip Compression 22.01 Test: Decompression Rating MIPS > Higher Is Better 8 x Intel Xeon E5-2620 v4 . 18423 |============================================ 7-Zip Compression 22.01 Test: Compression Rating MIPS > Higher Is Better 8 x Intel Xeon E5-2620 v4 . 27094 |============================================ LZ4 Compression 1.9.4 Compression Level: 9 - Decompression Speed MB/s > Higher Is Better 8 x Intel Xeon E5-2620 v4 . 2771.6 |=========================================== LZ4 Compression 1.9.4 Compression Level: 9 - Compression Speed MB/s > Higher Is Better 8 x Intel Xeon E5-2620 v4 . 22.85 |============================================ LZ4 Compression 1.9.4 Compression Level: 3 - Decompression Speed MB/s > Higher Is Better 8 x Intel Xeon E5-2620 v4 . 2632.8 |=========================================== LZ4 Compression 1.9.4 Compression Level: 3 - Compression Speed MB/s > Higher Is Better 8 x Intel Xeon E5-2620 v4 . 64.04 |============================================ Zstd Compression 1.5.4 Compression Level: 3 - Compression Speed MB/s > Higher Is Better 8 x Intel Xeon E5-2620 v4 . 796.0 |============================================ Zstd Compression 1.5.4 Compression Level: 3, Long Mode - Decompression Speed MB/s > Higher Is Better 8 x Intel Xeon E5-2620 v4 . 911.2 |============================================ Zstd Compression 1.5.4 Compression Level: 3, Long Mode - Compression Speed MB/s > Higher Is Better 8 x Intel Xeon E5-2620 v4 . 511.7 |============================================ Zstd Compression 1.5.4 Compression Level: 8, Long Mode - Decompression Speed MB/s > Higher Is Better 8 x Intel Xeon E5-2620 v4 . 956.1 |============================================ Zstd Compression 1.5.4 Compression Level: 8, Long Mode - Compression Speed MB/s > Higher Is Better 8 x Intel Xeon E5-2620 v4 . 182.1 |============================================ Zstd Compression 1.5.4 Compression Level: 12 - Decompression Speed MB/s > Higher Is Better 8 x Intel Xeon E5-2620 v4 . 966.6 |============================================ Zstd Compression 1.5.4 Compression Level: 12 - Compression Speed MB/s > Higher Is Better 8 x Intel Xeon E5-2620 v4 . 63.4 |============================================= Zstd Compression 1.5.4 Compression Level: 8 - Decompression Speed MB/s > Higher Is Better 8 x Intel Xeon E5-2620 v4 . 947.4 |============================================ Zstd Compression 1.5.4 Compression Level: 8 - Compression Speed MB/s > Higher Is Better 8 x Intel Xeon E5-2620 v4 . 186.7 |============================================ System ZLIB Decompression 1.2.7 ms < Lower Is Better 8 x Intel Xeon E5-2620 v4 . 3209.16 |========================================== System XZ Decompression Seconds < Lower Is Better 8 x Intel Xeon E5-2620 v4 . 8.296 |============================================ System GZIP Decompression Seconds < Lower Is Better 8 x Intel Xeon E5-2620 v4 . 6.467 |============================================ LZ4 Compression 1.9.4 Compression Level: 1 - Decompression Speed MB/s > Higher Is Better 8 x Intel Xeon E5-2620 v4 . 2799.4 |=========================================== LZ4 Compression 1.9.4 Compression Level: 1 - Compression Speed MB/s > Higher Is Better 8 x Intel Xeon E5-2620 v4 . 434.41 |=========================================== C-Blosc 2.11 Test: blosclz noshuffle - Buffer Size: 8MB MB/s > Higher Is Better 8 x Intel Xeon E5-2620 v4 . 5206.4 |=========================================== C-Blosc 2.11 Test: blosclz noshuffle - Buffer Size: 256MB MB/s > Higher Is Better 8 x Intel Xeon E5-2620 v4 . 2723.9 |=========================================== C-Blosc 2.11 Test: blosclz noshuffle - Buffer Size: 128MB MB/s > Higher Is Better 8 x Intel Xeon E5-2620 v4 . 3227.0 |=========================================== C-Blosc 2.11 Test: blosclz noshuffle - Buffer Size: 64MB MB/s > Higher Is Better 8 x Intel Xeon E5-2620 v4 . 3590.9 |=========================================== C-Blosc 2.11 Test: blosclz noshuffle - Buffer Size: 32MB MB/s > Higher Is Better 8 x Intel Xeon E5-2620 v4 . 3779.1 |=========================================== C-Blosc 2.11 Test: blosclz noshuffle - Buffer Size: 16MB MB/s > Higher Is Better 8 x Intel Xeon E5-2620 v4 . 4138.3 |=========================================== C-Blosc 2.11 Test: blosclz shuffle - Buffer Size: 256MB MB/s > Higher Is Better C-Blosc 2.11 Test: blosclz bitshuffle - Buffer Size: 256MB MB/s > Higher Is Better C-Blosc 2.11 Test: blosclz shuffle - Buffer Size: 128MB MB/s > Higher Is Better C-Blosc 2.11 Test: blosclz bitshuffle - Buffer Size: 128MB MB/s > Higher Is Better C-Blosc 2.11 Test: blosclz shuffle - Buffer Size: 64MB MB/s > Higher Is Better C-Blosc 2.11 Test: blosclz bitshuffle - Buffer Size: 64MB MB/s > Higher Is Better C-Blosc 2.11 Test: blosclz shuffle - Buffer Size: 32MB MB/s > Higher Is Better C-Blosc 2.11 Test: blosclz bitshuffle - Buffer Size: 32MB MB/s > Higher Is Better C-Blosc 2.11 Test: blosclz bitshuffle - Buffer Size: 16MB MB/s > Higher Is Better C-Blosc 2.11 Test: blosclz shuffle - Buffer Size: 16MB MB/s > Higher Is Better C-Blosc 2.11 Test: blosclz bitshuffle - Buffer Size: 8MB MB/s > Higher Is Better C-Blosc 2.11 Test: blosclz shuffle - Buffer Size: 8MB MB/s > Higher Is Better