testecompressaodebian1xenserver

Xen HVM domU 4.13 testing on Debian 11 via the Phoronix Test Suite.

Compare your own system(s) to this result file with the Phoronix Test Suite by running the command: phoronix-test-suite benchmark 2402136-NE-TESTECOMP65
Jump To Table - Results

Statistics

Remove Outliers Before Calculating Averages

Graph Settings

Prefer Vertical Bar Graphs

Multi-Way Comparison

Condense Multi-Option Tests Into Single Result Graphs

Table

Show Detailed System Result Table

Run Management

Result
Identifier
Performance Per
Dollar
Date
Run
  Test
  Duration
8 x Intel Xeon E5-2620 v4
February 12
  1 Day, 4 Hours, 26 Minutes
Only show results matching title/arguments (delimit multiple options with a comma):
Do not show results matching title/arguments (delimit multiple options with a comma):

testecompressaodebian1xenserver Xen HVM domU 4.13 testing on Debian 11 via the Phoronix Test Suite. 8 x Intel Xeon E5-2620 v4: Processor: 8 x Intel Xeon E5-2620 v4 (8 Cores), Motherboard: Xen HVM domU v4.13, Chipset: Intel 440FX 82441FX PMC, Memory: 3584MB, Disk: 57GB, Graphics: bochs-drmdrmfb OS: Debian 11, Kernel: 5.10.0-28-amd64 (x86_64), Desktop: GNOME Shell 3.38.6, Display Server: X Server + Wayland, Compiler: GCC 10.2.1 20210110, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 1024x768, System Layer: Xen HVM domU 4.13 C-Blosc 2.11 Test: blosclz shuffle - Buffer Size: 8MB MB/s > Higher Is Better C-Blosc 2.11 Test: blosclz shuffle - Buffer Size: 16MB MB/s > Higher Is Better C-Blosc 2.11 Test: blosclz shuffle - Buffer Size: 32MB MB/s > Higher Is Better C-Blosc 2.11 Test: blosclz shuffle - Buffer Size: 64MB MB/s > Higher Is Better C-Blosc 2.11 Test: blosclz noshuffle - Buffer Size: 8MB MB/s > Higher Is Better 8 x Intel Xeon E5-2620 v4 . 5206.4 |=========================================== C-Blosc 2.11 Test: blosclz shuffle - Buffer Size: 128MB MB/s > Higher Is Better C-Blosc 2.11 Test: blosclz shuffle - Buffer Size: 256MB MB/s > Higher Is Better C-Blosc 2.11 Test: blosclz bitshuffle - Buffer Size: 8MB MB/s > Higher Is Better C-Blosc 2.11 Test: blosclz noshuffle - Buffer Size: 16MB MB/s > Higher Is Better 8 x Intel Xeon E5-2620 v4 . 4138.3 |=========================================== C-Blosc 2.11 Test: blosclz noshuffle - Buffer Size: 32MB MB/s > Higher Is Better 8 x Intel Xeon E5-2620 v4 . 3779.1 |=========================================== C-Blosc 2.11 Test: blosclz noshuffle - Buffer Size: 64MB MB/s > Higher Is Better 8 x Intel Xeon E5-2620 v4 . 3590.9 |=========================================== C-Blosc 2.11 Test: blosclz bitshuffle - Buffer Size: 16MB MB/s > Higher Is Better C-Blosc 2.11 Test: blosclz bitshuffle - Buffer Size: 32MB MB/s > Higher Is Better C-Blosc 2.11 Test: blosclz bitshuffle - Buffer Size: 64MB MB/s > Higher Is Better C-Blosc 2.11 Test: blosclz noshuffle - Buffer Size: 128MB MB/s > Higher Is Better 8 x Intel Xeon E5-2620 v4 . 3227.0 |=========================================== C-Blosc 2.11 Test: blosclz noshuffle - Buffer Size: 256MB MB/s > Higher Is Better 8 x Intel Xeon E5-2620 v4 . 2723.9 |=========================================== C-Blosc 2.11 Test: blosclz bitshuffle - Buffer Size: 128MB MB/s > Higher Is Better C-Blosc 2.11 Test: blosclz bitshuffle - Buffer Size: 256MB MB/s > Higher Is Better lzbench 1.8 Test: XZ 0 - Process: Compression MB/s > Higher Is Better 8 x Intel Xeon E5-2620 v4 . 20 |=============================================== lzbench 1.8 Test: XZ 0 - Process: Decompression MB/s > Higher Is Better 8 x Intel Xeon E5-2620 v4 . 63 |=============================================== lzbench 1.8 Test: Zstd 1 - Process: Compression MB/s > Higher Is Better 8 x Intel Xeon E5-2620 v4 . 228 |============================================== lzbench 1.8 Test: Zstd 1 - Process: Decompression MB/s > Higher Is Better 8 x Intel Xeon E5-2620 v4 . 910 |============================================== lzbench 1.8 Test: Zstd 8 - Process: Compression MB/s > Higher Is Better 8 x Intel Xeon E5-2620 v4 . 36 |=============================================== lzbench 1.8 Test: Zstd 8 - Process: Decompression MB/s > Higher Is Better 8 x Intel Xeon E5-2620 v4 . 755 |============================================== lzbench 1.8 Test: Crush 0 - Process: Compression MB/s > Higher Is Better 8 x Intel Xeon E5-2620 v4 . 23.77 |============================================ lzbench 1.8 Test: Crush 0 - Process: Decompression MB/s > Higher Is Better 8 x Intel Xeon E5-2620 v4 . 197.66 |=========================================== lzbench 1.8 Test: Brotli 0 - Process: Compression MB/s > Higher Is Better 8 x Intel Xeon E5-2620 v4 . 311 |============================================== lzbench 1.8 Test: Brotli 0 - Process: Decompression MB/s > Higher Is Better 8 x Intel Xeon E5-2620 v4 . 427 |============================================== lzbench 1.8 Test: Brotli 2 - Process: Compression MB/s > Higher Is Better 8 x Intel Xeon E5-2620 v4 . 121 |============================================== lzbench 1.8 Test: Brotli 2 - Process: Decompression MB/s > Higher Is Better 8 x Intel Xeon E5-2620 v4 . 517 |============================================== lzbench 1.8 Test: Libdeflate 1 - Process: Compression MB/s > Higher Is Better 8 x Intel Xeon E5-2620 v4 . 152 |============================================== LZ4 Compression 1.9.4 Compression Level: 1 - Compression Speed MB/s > Higher Is Better 8 x Intel Xeon E5-2620 v4 . 434.41 |=========================================== LZ4 Compression 1.9.4 Compression Level: 1 - Decompression Speed MB/s > Higher Is Better 8 x Intel Xeon E5-2620 v4 . 2799.4 |=========================================== LZ4 Compression 1.9.4 Compression Level: 3 - Compression Speed MB/s > Higher Is Better 8 x Intel Xeon E5-2620 v4 . 64.04 |============================================ LZ4 Compression 1.9.4 Compression Level: 3 - Decompression Speed MB/s > Higher Is Better 8 x Intel Xeon E5-2620 v4 . 2632.8 |=========================================== LZ4 Compression 1.9.4 Compression Level: 9 - Compression Speed MB/s > Higher Is Better 8 x Intel Xeon E5-2620 v4 . 22.85 |============================================ LZ4 Compression 1.9.4 Compression Level: 9 - Decompression Speed MB/s > Higher Is Better 8 x Intel Xeon E5-2620 v4 . 2771.6 |=========================================== Zstd Compression 1.5.4 Compression Level: 3 - Compression Speed MB/s > Higher Is Better 8 x Intel Xeon E5-2620 v4 . 796.0 |============================================ Zstd Compression 1.5.4 Compression Level: 8 - Compression Speed MB/s > Higher Is Better 8 x Intel Xeon E5-2620 v4 . 186.7 |============================================ Zstd Compression 1.5.4 Compression Level: 8 - Decompression Speed MB/s > Higher Is Better 8 x Intel Xeon E5-2620 v4 . 947.4 |============================================ Zstd Compression 1.5.4 Compression Level: 12 - Compression Speed MB/s > Higher Is Better 8 x Intel Xeon E5-2620 v4 . 63.4 |============================================= Zstd Compression 1.5.4 Compression Level: 12 - Decompression Speed MB/s > Higher Is Better 8 x Intel Xeon E5-2620 v4 . 966.6 |============================================ Zstd Compression 1.5.4 Compression Level: 19 - Compression Speed MB/s > Higher Is Better 8 x Intel Xeon E5-2620 v4 . 9.28 |============================================= Zstd Compression 1.5.4 Compression Level: 19 - Decompression Speed MB/s > Higher Is Better 8 x Intel Xeon E5-2620 v4 . 857.1 |============================================ Zstd Compression 1.5.4 Compression Level: 3, Long Mode - Compression Speed MB/s > Higher Is Better 8 x Intel Xeon E5-2620 v4 . 511.7 |============================================ Zstd Compression 1.5.4 Compression Level: 3, Long Mode - Decompression Speed MB/s > Higher Is Better 8 x Intel Xeon E5-2620 v4 . 911.2 |============================================ Zstd Compression 1.5.4 Compression Level: 8, Long Mode - Compression Speed MB/s > Higher Is Better 8 x Intel Xeon E5-2620 v4 . 182.1 |============================================ Zstd Compression 1.5.4 Compression Level: 8, Long Mode - Decompression Speed MB/s > Higher Is Better 8 x Intel Xeon E5-2620 v4 . 956.1 |============================================ Zstd Compression 1.5.4 Compression Level: 19, Long Mode - Compression Speed MB/s > Higher Is Better 8 x Intel Xeon E5-2620 v4 . 5.48 |============================================= Zstd Compression 1.5.4 Compression Level: 19, Long Mode - Decompression Speed MB/s > Higher Is Better 8 x Intel Xeon E5-2620 v4 . 804.1 |============================================ 7-Zip Compression 22.01 Test: Compression Rating MIPS > Higher Is Better 8 x Intel Xeon E5-2620 v4 . 27094 |============================================ 7-Zip Compression 22.01 Test: Decompression Rating MIPS > Higher Is Better 8 x Intel Xeon E5-2620 v4 . 18423 |============================================ Gzip Compression Linux Source Tree Archiving To .tar.gz Seconds < Lower Is Better 8 x Intel Xeon E5-2620 v4 . 191.22 |=========================================== XZ Compression 5.2.4 Compressing ubuntu-16.04.3-server-i386.img, Compression Level 9 Seconds < Lower Is Better 8 x Intel Xeon E5-2620 v4 . 355.06 |=========================================== System GZIP Decompression Seconds < Lower Is Better 8 x Intel Xeon E5-2620 v4 . 6.467 |============================================ System XZ Decompression Seconds < Lower Is Better 8 x Intel Xeon E5-2620 v4 . 8.296 |============================================ System ZLIB Decompression 1.2.7 ms < Lower Is Better 8 x Intel Xeon E5-2620 v4 . 3209.16 |========================================== RAR Compression 6.0.2 Linux Source Tree Archiving To RAR Seconds < Lower Is Better 8 x Intel Xeon E5-2620 v4 . 2130.31 |==========================================