testecompressaodebian1 KVM testing on Debian 11 via the Phoronix Test Suite. 8 x Intel Xeon E5-2620 v4: Processor: 8 x Intel Xeon E5-2620 v4 (8 Cores), Motherboard: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9 2009) (1.15.0-1 BIOS), Chipset: Intel 82G33/G31/P35/P31 + ICH9, Memory: 3584MB, Disk: 57GB, Graphics: llvmpipe, Audio: QEMU Generic, Monitor: QEMU Monitor, Network: Red Hat Virtio device OS: Debian 11, Kernel: 5.10.0-27-amd64 (x86_64), Desktop: GNOME Shell 3.38.6, Display Server: X Server + Wayland, OpenGL: 4.5 Mesa 20.3.5 (LLVM 11.0.1 256 bits), Compiler: GCC 10.2.1 20210110, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 1024x768, System Layer: KVM C-Blosc 2.11 Test: blosclz shuffle - Buffer Size: 8MB MB/s > Higher Is Better C-Blosc 2.11 Test: blosclz shuffle - Buffer Size: 16MB MB/s > Higher Is Better C-Blosc 2.11 Test: blosclz shuffle - Buffer Size: 32MB MB/s > Higher Is Better C-Blosc 2.11 Test: blosclz shuffle - Buffer Size: 64MB MB/s > Higher Is Better C-Blosc 2.11 Test: blosclz noshuffle - Buffer Size: 8MB MB/s > Higher Is Better 8 x Intel Xeon E5-2620 v4 . 3448.5 |=========================================== C-Blosc 2.11 Test: blosclz shuffle - Buffer Size: 128MB MB/s > Higher Is Better C-Blosc 2.11 Test: blosclz shuffle - Buffer Size: 256MB MB/s > Higher Is Better C-Blosc 2.11 Test: blosclz bitshuffle - Buffer Size: 8MB MB/s > Higher Is Better C-Blosc 2.11 Test: blosclz noshuffle - Buffer Size: 16MB MB/s > Higher Is Better 8 x Intel Xeon E5-2620 v4 . 3395.1 |=========================================== C-Blosc 2.11 Test: blosclz noshuffle - Buffer Size: 32MB MB/s > Higher Is Better 8 x Intel Xeon E5-2620 v4 . 3036.5 |=========================================== C-Blosc 2.11 Test: blosclz noshuffle - Buffer Size: 64MB MB/s > Higher Is Better 8 x Intel Xeon E5-2620 v4 . 2774.2 |=========================================== C-Blosc 2.11 Test: blosclz bitshuffle - Buffer Size: 16MB MB/s > Higher Is Better C-Blosc 2.11 Test: blosclz bitshuffle - Buffer Size: 32MB MB/s > Higher Is Better C-Blosc 2.11 Test: blosclz bitshuffle - Buffer Size: 64MB MB/s > Higher Is Better C-Blosc 2.11 Test: blosclz noshuffle - Buffer Size: 128MB MB/s > Higher Is Better 8 x Intel Xeon E5-2620 v4 . 2413.5 |=========================================== C-Blosc 2.11 Test: blosclz noshuffle - Buffer Size: 256MB MB/s > Higher Is Better 8 x Intel Xeon E5-2620 v4 . 1928.1 |=========================================== C-Blosc 2.11 Test: blosclz bitshuffle - Buffer Size: 128MB MB/s > Higher Is Better C-Blosc 2.11 Test: blosclz bitshuffle - Buffer Size: 256MB MB/s > Higher Is Better lzbench 1.8 Test: XZ 0 - Process: Compression MB/s > Higher Is Better 8 x Intel Xeon E5-2620 v4 . 14 |=============================================== lzbench 1.8 Test: XZ 0 - Process: Decompression MB/s > Higher Is Better 8 x Intel Xeon E5-2620 v4 . 49 |=============================================== lzbench 1.8 Test: Zstd 1 - Process: Compression MB/s > Higher Is Better 8 x Intel Xeon E5-2620 v4 . 164 |============================================== lzbench 1.8 Test: Zstd 1 - Process: Decompression MB/s > Higher Is Better 8 x Intel Xeon E5-2620 v4 . 518 |============================================== lzbench 1.8 Test: Zstd 8 - Process: Compression MB/s > Higher Is Better 8 x Intel Xeon E5-2620 v4 . 28 |=============================================== lzbench 1.8 Test: Zstd 8 - Process: Decompression MB/s > Higher Is Better 8 x Intel Xeon E5-2620 v4 . 556 |============================================== lzbench 1.8 Test: Crush 0 - Process: Compression MB/s > Higher Is Better 8 x Intel Xeon E5-2620 v4 . 35 |=============================================== lzbench 1.8 Test: Crush 0 - Process: Decompression MB/s > Higher Is Better 8 x Intel Xeon E5-2620 v4 . 227 |============================================== lzbench 1.8 Test: Brotli 0 - Process: Compression MB/s > Higher Is Better 8 x Intel Xeon E5-2620 v4 . 161 |============================================== lzbench 1.8 Test: Brotli 0 - Process: Decompression MB/s > Higher Is Better 8 x Intel Xeon E5-2620 v4 . 220 |============================================== lzbench 1.8 Test: Brotli 2 - Process: Compression MB/s > Higher Is Better 8 x Intel Xeon E5-2620 v4 . 60 |=============================================== lzbench 1.8 Test: Brotli 2 - Process: Decompression MB/s > Higher Is Better 8 x Intel Xeon E5-2620 v4 . 250 |============================================== lzbench 1.8 Test: Libdeflate 1 - Process: Compression MB/s > Higher Is Better 8 x Intel Xeon E5-2620 v4 . 69 |=============================================== LZ4 Compression 1.9.4 Compression Level: 1 - Compression Speed MB/s > Higher Is Better 8 x Intel Xeon E5-2620 v4 . 227.69 |=========================================== LZ4 Compression 1.9.4 Compression Level: 1 - Decompression Speed MB/s > Higher Is Better 8 x Intel Xeon E5-2620 v4 . 1301.5 |=========================================== LZ4 Compression 1.9.4 Compression Level: 3 - Compression Speed MB/s > Higher Is Better 8 x Intel Xeon E5-2620 v4 . 28.92 |============================================ LZ4 Compression 1.9.4 Compression Level: 3 - Decompression Speed MB/s > Higher Is Better 8 x Intel Xeon E5-2620 v4 . 1190.4 |=========================================== LZ4 Compression 1.9.4 Compression Level: 9 - Compression Speed MB/s > Higher Is Better 8 x Intel Xeon E5-2620 v4 . 10.51 |============================================ LZ4 Compression 1.9.4 Compression Level: 9 - Decompression Speed MB/s > Higher Is Better 8 x Intel Xeon E5-2620 v4 . 1260.2 |=========================================== Zstd Compression 1.5.4 Compression Level: 3 - Compression Speed MB/s > Higher Is Better 8 x Intel Xeon E5-2620 v4 . 524.2 |============================================ Zstd Compression 1.5.4 Compression Level: 3 - Decompression Speed MB/s > Higher Is Better 8 x Intel Xeon E5-2620 v4 . 589.1 |============================================ Zstd Compression 1.5.4 Compression Level: 8 - Compression Speed MB/s > Higher Is Better 8 x Intel Xeon E5-2620 v4 . 129.3 |============================================ Zstd Compression 1.5.4 Compression Level: 8 - Decompression Speed MB/s > Higher Is Better 8 x Intel Xeon E5-2620 v4 . 646.2 |============================================ Zstd Compression 1.5.4 Compression Level: 12 - Compression Speed MB/s > Higher Is Better 8 x Intel Xeon E5-2620 v4 . 41.7 |============================================= Zstd Compression 1.5.4 Compression Level: 12 - Decompression Speed MB/s > Higher Is Better 8 x Intel Xeon E5-2620 v4 . 600.2 |============================================ Zstd Compression 1.5.4 Compression Level: 19 - Compression Speed MB/s > Higher Is Better 8 x Intel Xeon E5-2620 v4 . 5.48 |============================================= Zstd Compression 1.5.4 Compression Level: 19 - Decompression Speed MB/s > Higher Is Better 8 x Intel Xeon E5-2620 v4 . 475.4 |============================================ Zstd Compression 1.5.4 Compression Level: 3, Long Mode - Compression Speed MB/s > Higher Is Better 8 x Intel Xeon E5-2620 v4 . 361.6 |============================================ Zstd Compression 1.5.4 Compression Level: 3, Long Mode - Decompression Speed MB/s > Higher Is Better 8 x Intel Xeon E5-2620 v4 . 512.7 |============================================ Zstd Compression 1.5.4 Compression Level: 8, Long Mode - Compression Speed MB/s > Higher Is Better 8 x Intel Xeon E5-2620 v4 . 135.4 |============================================ Zstd Compression 1.5.4 Compression Level: 8, Long Mode - Decompression Speed MB/s > Higher Is Better 8 x Intel Xeon E5-2620 v4 . 657.7 |============================================ Zstd Compression 1.5.4 Compression Level: 19, Long Mode - Compression Speed MB/s > Higher Is Better 8 x Intel Xeon E5-2620 v4 . 2.78 |============================================= Zstd Compression 1.5.4 Compression Level: 19, Long Mode - Decompression Speed MB/s > Higher Is Better 8 x Intel Xeon E5-2620 v4 . 339.7 |============================================ 7-Zip Compression 22.01 Test: Compression Rating MIPS > Higher Is Better 8 x Intel Xeon E5-2620 v4 . 15643 |============================================ 7-Zip Compression 22.01 Test: Decompression Rating MIPS > Higher Is Better 8 x Intel Xeon E5-2620 v4 . 13642 |============================================ Gzip Compression Linux Source Tree Archiving To .tar.gz Seconds < Lower Is Better 8 x Intel Xeon E5-2620 v4 . 101.91 |=========================================== XZ Compression 5.2.4 Compressing ubuntu-16.04.3-server-i386.img, Compression Level 9 Seconds < Lower Is Better 8 x Intel Xeon E5-2620 v4 . 87.71 |============================================ System GZIP Decompression Seconds < Lower Is Better 8 x Intel Xeon E5-2620 v4 . 7.459 |============================================ System XZ Decompression Seconds < Lower Is Better 8 x Intel Xeon E5-2620 v4 . 9.780 |============================================ System ZLIB Decompression 1.2.7 ms < Lower Is Better 8 x Intel Xeon E5-2620 v4 . 4639.89 |========================================== RAR Compression 6.0.2 Linux Source Tree Archiving To RAR Seconds < Lower Is Better 8 x Intel Xeon E5-2620 v4 . 193.51 |===========================================