testecompressaowindows3

2 x Intel Xeon E5-2620 v4 testing with a Placa-me (1.15.0-1 BIOS) and Adaptador de Vdeo Bsico da Microsoft on Microsoft Windows 10 Pro Build 19045 via the Phoronix Test Suite.

Compare your own system(s) to this result file with the Phoronix Test Suite by running the command: phoronix-test-suite benchmark 2402086-NE-TESTECOMP54
Jump To Table - Results

Statistics

Remove Outliers Before Calculating Averages

Graph Settings

Prefer Vertical Bar Graphs

Multi-Way Comparison

Condense Multi-Option Tests Into Single Result Graphs

Table

Show Detailed System Result Table

Run Management

Result
Identifier
View Logs
Performance Per
Dollar
Date
Run
  Test
  Duration
2 x Intel Xeon E5-2620 v4
February 06
  8 Hours, 33 Minutes
Only show results matching title/arguments (delimit multiple options with a comma):
Do not show results matching title/arguments (delimit multiple options with a comma):

testecompressaowindows3 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2620 v4 testing with a Placa-me (1.15.0-1 BIOS) and Adaptador de Vdeo Bsico da Microsoft on Microsoft Windows 10 Pro Build 19045 via the Phoronix Test Suite. 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2620 v4: Processor: 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz (2 Cores), Motherboard: Placa-me (1.15.0-1 BIOS), Memory: 1 x 3368 MB 0MHz QEMU, Disk: 80GB QEMU HDD, Graphics: Adaptador de Vdeo Bsico da Microsoft, Audio: Dispositivo de HD Audio OS: Microsoft Windows 10 Pro Build 19045, Kernel: 10.0.19045.3930 (x86_64), Display Driver: 10.0.19041.3636, File-System: NTFS, Screen Resolution: 1024x768 lzbench 1.8 Test: XZ 0 - Process: Compression MB/s > Higher Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2620 v4 . 16.00 |============================================ 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2620 v4 . 6.99 |=================== lzbench 1.8 Test: XZ 0 - Process: Decompression MB/s > Higher Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2620 v4 . 53 |=============================================== 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2620 v4 . 33 |============================= lzbench 1.8 Test: Zstd 1 - Process: Compression MB/s > Higher Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2620 v4 . 237 |============================================== 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2620 v4 . 109 |===================== lzbench 1.8 Test: Zstd 1 - Process: Decompression MB/s > Higher Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2620 v4 . 397 |============================================== 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2620 v4 . 193 |====================== lzbench 1.8 Test: Zstd 8 - Process: Compression MB/s > Higher Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2620 v4 . 37.00 |============================================ 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2620 v4 . 8.97 |=========== lzbench 1.8 Test: Zstd 8 - Process: Decompression MB/s > Higher Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2620 v4 . 432 |============================================== 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2620 v4 . 190 |==================== lzbench 1.8 Test: Crush 0 - Process: Compression MB/s > Higher Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2620 v4 . 35.00 |============================================ 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2620 v4 . 14.15 |================== lzbench 1.8 Test: Crush 0 - Process: Decompression MB/s > Higher Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2620 v4 . 232 |============================================== 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2620 v4 . 134 |=========================== lzbench 1.8 Test: Brotli 0 - Process: Compression MB/s > Higher Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2620 v4 . 91 |=============================================== lzbench 1.8 Test: Brotli 0 - Process: Decompression MB/s > Higher Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2620 v4 . 155 |============================================== lzbench 1.8 Test: Brotli 2 - Process: Compression MB/s > Higher Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2620 v4 . 32 |=============================================== lzbench 1.8 Test: Brotli 2 - Process: Decompression MB/s > Higher Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2620 v4 . 161 |============================================== lzbench 1.8 Test: Libdeflate 1 - Process: Compression MB/s > Higher Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2620 v4 . 69 |=============================================== lzbench 1.8 Test: Libdeflate 1 - Process: Decompression MB/s > Higher Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2620 v4 . 447 |============================================== LZ4 Compression 1.9.4 Compression Level: 1 - Compression Speed MB/s > Higher Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2620 v4 . 256.84 |=========================================== LZ4 Compression 1.9.4 Compression Level: 1 - Decompression Speed MB/s > Higher Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2620 v4 . 1560.2 |=========================================== LZ4 Compression 1.9.4 Compression Level: 3 - Compression Speed MB/s > Higher Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2620 v4 . 31.96 |============================================ LZ4 Compression 1.9.4 Compression Level: 3 - Decompression Speed MB/s > Higher Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2620 v4 . 1575.8 |=========================================== LZ4 Compression 1.9.4 Compression Level: 9 - Compression Speed MB/s > Higher Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2620 v4 . 11.77 |============================================ LZ4 Compression 1.9.4 Compression Level: 9 - Decompression Speed MB/s > Higher Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2620 v4 . 1314.1 |=========================================== 7-Zip Compression 22.01 MIPS > Higher Is Better Gzip Compression Seconds < Lower Is Better XZ Compression 5.2.4 Compressing ubuntu-16.04.3-server-i386.img, Compression Level 9 Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2620 v4 . 346.01 |=========================================== RAR Compression 6.0.2 Linux Source Tree Archiving To RAR Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2620 v4 . 5.465 |============================================