RPi5-8GB-Raspbian-02 4x ARMv8 Cortex-A76 at 2.4 GHz and 800 MHz VideoCore VII tested on a BCM2712 Raspberry Pi 5 Model B Rev 1.0 running Raspberry Pi OS ("Raspbian", based on Debian 12 Bookworm) 64-bit (Linux 6.1.0-rpi7-rpi-2712) and Phoronix Test Suite, with official Raspberry Pi Active Cooler and an off-brand 27W 5.1V5A Power Supply. RPi5 8GB Raspbian CPUFreq-Performance OfficialActiveCooler PSU-27W Run02: Processor: ARMv8 Cortex-A76 @ 2.40GHz (4 Cores), Motherboard: Raspberry Pi 5 Model B Rev 1.0, Memory: 8GB, Disk: 1024GB SSD, Graphics: vc4drmfb, Monitor: MACROSILICON, Network: Device 1de4:0001 OS: Debian 12, Kernel: 6.1.0-rpi7-rpi-2712 (aarch64), Display Server: X Server, Compiler: GCC 12.2.0, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 1280x720 AOM AV1 3.7 Encoder Mode: Speed 11 Realtime - Input: Bosphorus 1080p Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better RPi5 8GB Raspbian CPUFreq-Performance OfficialActiveCooler PSU-27W Run02 . 25.51 | AOM AV1 3.7 Encoder Mode: Speed 10 Realtime - Input: Bosphorus 1080p Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better RPi5 8GB Raspbian CPUFreq-Performance OfficialActiveCooler PSU-27W Run02 . 25.75 | AOM AV1 3.7 Encoder Mode: Speed 9 Realtime - Input: Bosphorus 1080p Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better RPi5 8GB Raspbian CPUFreq-Performance OfficialActiveCooler PSU-27W Run02 . 25.66 | AOM AV1 3.7 Encoder Mode: Speed 8 Realtime - Input: Bosphorus 1080p Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better RPi5 8GB Raspbian CPUFreq-Performance OfficialActiveCooler PSU-27W Run02 . 23.60 | AOM AV1 3.7 Encoder Mode: Speed 6 Two-Pass - Input: Bosphorus 1080p Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better RPi5 8GB Raspbian CPUFreq-Performance OfficialActiveCooler PSU-27W Run02 . 4.48 | AOM AV1 3.7 Encoder Mode: Speed 6 Realtime - Input: Bosphorus 1080p Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better RPi5 8GB Raspbian CPUFreq-Performance OfficialActiveCooler PSU-27W Run02 . 22.19 | AOM AV1 3.7 Encoder Mode: Speed 4 Two-Pass - Input: Bosphorus 1080p Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better RPi5 8GB Raspbian CPUFreq-Performance OfficialActiveCooler PSU-27W Run02 . 1.70 | AOM AV1 3.7 Encoder Mode: Speed 0 Two-Pass - Input: Bosphorus 1080p Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better RPi5 8GB Raspbian CPUFreq-Performance OfficialActiveCooler PSU-27W Run02 . 0.06 | AOM AV1 3.7 Encoder Mode: Speed 11 Realtime - Input: Bosphorus 4K Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better RPi5 8GB Raspbian CPUFreq-Performance OfficialActiveCooler PSU-27W Run02 . 8.20 | AOM AV1 3.7 Encoder Mode: Speed 10 Realtime - Input: Bosphorus 4K Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better RPi5 8GB Raspbian CPUFreq-Performance OfficialActiveCooler PSU-27W Run02 . 8.18 | AOM AV1 3.7 Encoder Mode: Speed 9 Realtime - Input: Bosphorus 4K Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better RPi5 8GB Raspbian CPUFreq-Performance OfficialActiveCooler PSU-27W Run02 . 8.01 | AOM AV1 3.7 Encoder Mode: Speed 8 Realtime - Input: Bosphorus 4K Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better RPi5 8GB Raspbian CPUFreq-Performance OfficialActiveCooler PSU-27W Run02 . 6.94 | AOM AV1 3.7 Encoder Mode: Speed 6 Two-Pass - Input: Bosphorus 4K Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better RPi5 8GB Raspbian CPUFreq-Performance OfficialActiveCooler PSU-27W Run02 . 1.11 | AOM AV1 3.7 Encoder Mode: Speed 6 Realtime - Input: Bosphorus 4K Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better RPi5 8GB Raspbian CPUFreq-Performance OfficialActiveCooler PSU-27W Run02 . 7.10 | AOM AV1 3.7 Encoder Mode: Speed 4 Two-Pass - Input: Bosphorus 4K Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better RPi5 8GB Raspbian CPUFreq-Performance OfficialActiveCooler PSU-27W Run02 . 0.62 | AOM AV1 3.7 Encoder Mode: Speed 0 Two-Pass - Input: Bosphorus 4K Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better RPi5 8GB Raspbian CPUFreq-Performance OfficialActiveCooler PSU-27W Run02 . 0.02 | dav1d 1.2.1 Video Input: Chimera 1080p 10-bit FPS > Higher Is Better RPi5 8GB Raspbian CPUFreq-Performance OfficialActiveCooler PSU-27W Run02 . 49.62 | dav1d 1.2.1 Video Input: Summer Nature 1080p FPS > Higher Is Better RPi5 8GB Raspbian CPUFreq-Performance OfficialActiveCooler PSU-27W Run02 . 112.66 | dav1d 1.2.1 Video Input: Summer Nature 4K FPS > Higher Is Better RPi5 8GB Raspbian CPUFreq-Performance OfficialActiveCooler PSU-27W Run02 . 24.33 | dav1d 1.2.1 Video Input: Chimera 1080p FPS > Higher Is Better RPi5 8GB Raspbian CPUFreq-Performance OfficialActiveCooler PSU-27W Run02 . 87.72 | easyWave r34 Input: e2Asean Grid + BengkuluSept2007 Source - Time: 2400 Seconds < Lower Is Better RPi5 8GB Raspbian CPUFreq-Performance OfficialActiveCooler PSU-27W Run02 . 6278.76 | easyWave r34 Input: e2Asean Grid + BengkuluSept2007 Source - Time: 1200 Seconds < Lower Is Better RPi5 8GB Raspbian CPUFreq-Performance OfficialActiveCooler PSU-27W Run02 . 2542.71 | easyWave r34 Input: e2Asean Grid + BengkuluSept2007 Source - Time: 240 Seconds < Lower Is Better RPi5 8GB Raspbian CPUFreq-Performance OfficialActiveCooler PSU-27W Run02 . 145.38 | GraphicsMagick 1.3.38 Operation: HWB Color Space Iterations Per Minute > Higher Is Better RPi5 8GB Raspbian CPUFreq-Performance OfficialActiveCooler PSU-27W Run02 . 302 | GraphicsMagick 1.3.38 Operation: Noise-Gaussian Iterations Per Minute > Higher Is Better RPi5 8GB Raspbian CPUFreq-Performance OfficialActiveCooler PSU-27W Run02 . 63 | GraphicsMagick 1.3.38 Operation: Resizing Iterations Per Minute > Higher Is Better RPi5 8GB Raspbian CPUFreq-Performance OfficialActiveCooler PSU-27W Run02 . 179 | GraphicsMagick 1.3.38 Operation: Enhanced Iterations Per Minute > Higher Is Better RPi5 8GB Raspbian CPUFreq-Performance OfficialActiveCooler PSU-27W Run02 . 46 | GraphicsMagick 1.3.38 Operation: Sharpen Iterations Per Minute > Higher Is Better RPi5 8GB Raspbian CPUFreq-Performance OfficialActiveCooler PSU-27W Run02 . 49 | GraphicsMagick 1.3.38 Operation: Rotate Iterations Per Minute > Higher Is Better RPi5 8GB Raspbian CPUFreq-Performance OfficialActiveCooler PSU-27W Run02 . 299 | GraphicsMagick 1.3.38 Operation: Swirl Iterations Per Minute > Higher Is Better RPi5 8GB Raspbian CPUFreq-Performance OfficialActiveCooler PSU-27W Run02 . 121 | John The Ripper 2023.03.14 Test: MD5 Real C/S > Higher Is Better RPi5 8GB Raspbian CPUFreq-Performance OfficialActiveCooler PSU-27W Run02 . 87179 | John The Ripper 2023.03.14 Test: Traditional DES Real C/S > Higher Is Better RPi5 8GB Raspbian CPUFreq-Performance OfficialActiveCooler PSU-27W Run02 . 9223000 | John The Ripper 2023.03.14 Test: HMAC-SHA512 Real C/S > Higher Is Better RPi5 8GB Raspbian CPUFreq-Performance OfficialActiveCooler PSU-27W Run02 . 4707000 | John The Ripper 2023.03.14 Test: Blowfish Real C/S > Higher Is Better RPi5 8GB Raspbian CPUFreq-Performance OfficialActiveCooler PSU-27W Run02 . 2711 | John The Ripper 2023.03.14 Test: WPA PSK Real C/S > Higher Is Better RPi5 8GB Raspbian CPUFreq-Performance OfficialActiveCooler PSU-27W Run02 . 3641 | John The Ripper 2023.03.14 Test: bcrypt Real C/S > Higher Is Better RPi5 8GB Raspbian CPUFreq-Performance OfficialActiveCooler PSU-27W Run02 . 2712 | LibRaw 0.20 Post-Processing Benchmark Mpix/sec > Higher Is Better RPi5 8GB Raspbian CPUFreq-Performance OfficialActiveCooler PSU-27W Run02 . 14.46 | Botan 2.17.3 Test: ChaCha20Poly1305 - Decrypt MiB/s > Higher Is Better RPi5 8GB Raspbian CPUFreq-Performance OfficialActiveCooler PSU-27W Run02 . 226.32 | Botan 2.17.3 Test: ChaCha20Poly1305 MiB/s > Higher Is Better RPi5 8GB Raspbian CPUFreq-Performance OfficialActiveCooler PSU-27W Run02 . 228.35 | Botan 2.17.3 Test: CAST-256 - Decrypt MiB/s > Higher Is Better RPi5 8GB Raspbian CPUFreq-Performance OfficialActiveCooler PSU-27W Run02 . 91.55 | Botan 2.17.3 Test: CAST-256 MiB/s > Higher Is Better RPi5 8GB Raspbian CPUFreq-Performance OfficialActiveCooler PSU-27W Run02 . 91.64 | Botan 2.17.3 Test: Blowfish - Decrypt MiB/s > Higher Is Better RPi5 8GB Raspbian CPUFreq-Performance OfficialActiveCooler PSU-27W Run02 . 236.33 | Botan 2.17.3 Test: Blowfish MiB/s > Higher Is Better RPi5 8GB Raspbian CPUFreq-Performance OfficialActiveCooler PSU-27W Run02 . 234.34 | Botan 2.17.3 Test: Twofish - Decrypt MiB/s > Higher Is Better RPi5 8GB Raspbian CPUFreq-Performance OfficialActiveCooler PSU-27W Run02 . 204.27 | Botan 2.17.3 Test: Twofish MiB/s > Higher Is Better RPi5 8GB Raspbian CPUFreq-Performance OfficialActiveCooler PSU-27W Run02 . 200.02 | Botan 2.17.3 Test: AES-256 - Decrypt MiB/s > Higher Is Better RPi5 8GB Raspbian CPUFreq-Performance OfficialActiveCooler PSU-27W Run02 . 2211.54 | Botan 2.17.3 Test: AES-256 MiB/s > Higher Is Better RPi5 8GB Raspbian CPUFreq-Performance OfficialActiveCooler PSU-27W Run02 . 2211.59 | Botan 2.17.3 Test: KASUMI - Decrypt MiB/s > Higher Is Better RPi5 8GB Raspbian CPUFreq-Performance OfficialActiveCooler PSU-27W Run02 . 52.51 | Botan 2.17.3 Test: KASUMI MiB/s > Higher Is Better RPi5 8GB Raspbian CPUFreq-Performance OfficialActiveCooler PSU-27W Run02 . 52.16 | LuaJIT 2.1-git Test: Jacobi Successive Over-Relaxation Mflops > Higher Is Better RPi5 8GB Raspbian CPUFreq-Performance OfficialActiveCooler PSU-27W Run02 . 921.52 | LuaJIT 2.1-git Test: Dense LU Matrix Factorization Mflops > Higher Is Better RPi5 8GB Raspbian CPUFreq-Performance OfficialActiveCooler PSU-27W Run02 . 420.04 | LuaJIT 2.1-git Test: Sparse Matrix Multiply Mflops > Higher Is Better RPi5 8GB Raspbian CPUFreq-Performance OfficialActiveCooler PSU-27W Run02 . 629.60 | LuaJIT 2.1-git Test: Fast Fourier Transform Mflops > Higher Is Better RPi5 8GB Raspbian CPUFreq-Performance OfficialActiveCooler PSU-27W Run02 . 54.23 | LuaJIT 2.1-git Test: Monte Carlo Mflops > Higher Is Better RPi5 8GB Raspbian CPUFreq-Performance OfficialActiveCooler PSU-27W Run02 . 208.97 | LuaJIT 2.1-git Test: Composite Mflops > Higher Is Better RPi5 8GB Raspbian CPUFreq-Performance OfficialActiveCooler PSU-27W Run02 . 446.87 | Nettle 3.8 Test: poly1305-aes Mbyte/s > Higher Is Better RPi5 8GB Raspbian CPUFreq-Performance OfficialActiveCooler PSU-27W Run02 . 946.21 | Nettle 3.8 Test: sha512 Mbyte/s > Higher Is Better RPi5 8GB Raspbian CPUFreq-Performance OfficialActiveCooler PSU-27W Run02 . 376.73 | Nettle 3.8 Test: chacha Mbyte/s > Higher Is Better RPi5 8GB Raspbian CPUFreq-Performance OfficialActiveCooler PSU-27W Run02 . 612.69 | Nettle 3.8 Test: aes256 Mbyte/s > Higher Is Better RPi5 8GB Raspbian CPUFreq-Performance OfficialActiveCooler PSU-27W Run02 . 2848.71 | WebP2 Image Encode 20220823 Encode Settings: Quality 100, Compression Effort 5 MP/s > Higher Is Better RPi5 8GB Raspbian CPUFreq-Performance OfficialActiveCooler PSU-27W Run02 . 0.52 | WebP2 Image Encode 20220823 Encode Settings: Quality 95, Compression Effort 7 MP/s > Higher Is Better RPi5 8GB Raspbian CPUFreq-Performance OfficialActiveCooler PSU-27W Run02 . 0.01 | WebP2 Image Encode 20220823 Encode Settings: Quality 75, Compression Effort 7 MP/s > Higher Is Better RPi5 8GB Raspbian CPUFreq-Performance OfficialActiveCooler PSU-27W Run02 . 0.02 | WebP2 Image Encode 20220823 Encode Settings: Default MP/s > Higher Is Better RPi5 8GB Raspbian CPUFreq-Performance OfficialActiveCooler PSU-27W Run02 . 1.35 | WebP Image Encode 1.2.4 Encode Settings: Quality 100, Lossless, Highest Compression MP/s > Higher Is Better RPi5 8GB Raspbian CPUFreq-Performance OfficialActiveCooler PSU-27W Run02 . 0.21 | WebP Image Encode 1.2.4 Encode Settings: Quality 100, Highest Compression MP/s > Higher Is Better RPi5 8GB Raspbian CPUFreq-Performance OfficialActiveCooler PSU-27W Run02 . 2.00 | WebP Image Encode 1.2.4 Encode Settings: Quality 100, Lossless MP/s > Higher Is Better RPi5 8GB Raspbian CPUFreq-Performance OfficialActiveCooler PSU-27W Run02 . 0.60 | WebP Image Encode 1.2.4 Encode Settings: Quality 100 MP/s > Higher Is Better RPi5 8GB Raspbian CPUFreq-Performance OfficialActiveCooler PSU-27W Run02 . 5.09 | WebP Image Encode 1.2.4 Encode Settings: Default MP/s > Higher Is Better RPi5 8GB Raspbian CPUFreq-Performance OfficialActiveCooler PSU-27W Run02 . 7.52 | JPEG XL Decoding libjxl 0.7 CPU Threads: All MP/s > Higher Is Better RPi5 8GB Raspbian CPUFreq-Performance OfficialActiveCooler PSU-27W Run02 . 27.64 | JPEG XL Decoding libjxl 0.7 CPU Threads: 1 MP/s > Higher Is Better RPi5 8GB Raspbian CPUFreq-Performance OfficialActiveCooler PSU-27W Run02 . 15.88 | JPEG XL libjxl 0.7 Input: JPEG - Quality: 100 MP/s > Higher Is Better RPi5 8GB Raspbian CPUFreq-Performance OfficialActiveCooler PSU-27W Run02 . 0.31 | JPEG XL libjxl 0.7 Input: PNG - Quality: 100 MP/s > Higher Is Better RPi5 8GB Raspbian CPUFreq-Performance OfficialActiveCooler PSU-27W Run02 . 0.31 | JPEG XL libjxl 0.7 Input: JPEG - Quality: 90 MP/s > Higher Is Better RPi5 8GB Raspbian CPUFreq-Performance OfficialActiveCooler PSU-27W Run02 . 3.06 | JPEG XL libjxl 0.7 Input: JPEG - Quality: 80 MP/s > Higher Is Better RPi5 8GB Raspbian CPUFreq-Performance OfficialActiveCooler PSU-27W Run02 . 3.13 | JPEG XL libjxl 0.7 Input: PNG - Quality: 90 MP/s > Higher Is Better RPi5 8GB Raspbian CPUFreq-Performance OfficialActiveCooler PSU-27W Run02 . 3.18 | JPEG XL libjxl 0.7 Input: PNG - Quality: 80 MP/s > Higher Is Better RPi5 8GB Raspbian CPUFreq-Performance OfficialActiveCooler PSU-27W Run02 . 3.25 | Zstd Compression 1.5.4 Compression Level: 19, Long Mode - Decompression Speed MB/s > Higher Is Better RPi5 8GB Raspbian CPUFreq-Performance OfficialActiveCooler PSU-27W Run02 . 471.3 | Zstd Compression 1.5.4 Compression Level: 19, Long Mode - Compression Speed MB/s > Higher Is Better RPi5 8GB Raspbian CPUFreq-Performance OfficialActiveCooler PSU-27W Run02 . 3.16 | Zstd Compression 1.5.4 Compression Level: 8, Long Mode - Decompression Speed MB/s > Higher Is Better RPi5 8GB Raspbian CPUFreq-Performance OfficialActiveCooler PSU-27W Run02 . 668.1 | Zstd Compression 1.5.4 Compression Level: 8, Long Mode - Compression Speed MB/s > Higher Is Better RPi5 8GB Raspbian CPUFreq-Performance OfficialActiveCooler PSU-27W Run02 . 26.5 | Zstd Compression 1.5.4 Compression Level: 3, Long Mode - Decompression Speed MB/s > Higher Is Better RPi5 8GB Raspbian CPUFreq-Performance OfficialActiveCooler PSU-27W Run02 . 685.4 | Zstd Compression 1.5.4 Compression Level: 3, Long Mode - Compression Speed MB/s > Higher Is Better RPi5 8GB Raspbian CPUFreq-Performance OfficialActiveCooler PSU-27W Run02 . 84.4 | Zstd Compression 1.5.4 Compression Level: 19 - Decompression Speed MB/s > Higher Is Better RPi5 8GB Raspbian CPUFreq-Performance OfficialActiveCooler PSU-27W Run02 . 430.3 | Zstd Compression 1.5.4 Compression Level: 19 - Compression Speed MB/s > Higher Is Better RPi5 8GB Raspbian CPUFreq-Performance OfficialActiveCooler PSU-27W Run02 . 3.93 | Zstd Compression 1.5.4 Compression Level: 12 - Decompression Speed MB/s > Higher Is Better RPi5 8GB Raspbian CPUFreq-Performance OfficialActiveCooler PSU-27W Run02 . 545.8 | Zstd Compression 1.5.4 Compression Level: 12 - Compression Speed MB/s > Higher Is Better RPi5 8GB Raspbian CPUFreq-Performance OfficialActiveCooler PSU-27W Run02 . 10.6 | Zstd Compression 1.5.4 Compression Level: 8 - Decompression Speed MB/s > Higher Is Better RPi5 8GB Raspbian CPUFreq-Performance OfficialActiveCooler PSU-27W Run02 . 667.1 | Zstd Compression 1.5.4 Compression Level: 8 - Compression Speed MB/s > Higher Is Better RPi5 8GB Raspbian CPUFreq-Performance OfficialActiveCooler PSU-27W Run02 . 24.8 | Zstd Compression 1.5.4 Compression Level: 3 - Decompression Speed MB/s > Higher Is Better RPi5 8GB Raspbian CPUFreq-Performance OfficialActiveCooler PSU-27W Run02 . 667.9 | Zstd Compression 1.5.4 Compression Level: 3 - Compression Speed MB/s > Higher Is Better RPi5 8GB Raspbian CPUFreq-Performance OfficialActiveCooler PSU-27W Run02 . 84.5 | CacheBench Test: Read / Modify / Write MB/s > Higher Is Better RPi5 8GB Raspbian CPUFreq-Performance OfficialActiveCooler PSU-27W Run02 . 36050.76 | CacheBench Write Cache MB/s > Higher Is Better RPi5 8GB Raspbian CPUFreq-Performance OfficialActiveCooler PSU-27W Run02 . 30602.67 | CacheBench Test: Write MB/s > Higher Is Better RPi5 8GB Raspbian CPUFreq-Performance OfficialActiveCooler PSU-27W Run02 . 30602.64 | CacheBench Test: Read MB/s > Higher Is Better RPi5 8GB Raspbian CPUFreq-Performance OfficialActiveCooler PSU-27W Run02 . 9151.11 | CacheBench Read Cache MB/s > Higher Is Better RPi5 8GB Raspbian CPUFreq-Performance OfficialActiveCooler PSU-27W Run02 . 9151.05 | Renaissance 0.14 Test: Akka Unbalanced Cobwebbed Tree ms < Lower Is Better RPi5 8GB Raspbian CPUFreq-Performance OfficialActiveCooler PSU-27W Run02 . 21429.2 | Renaissance 0.14 Test: Apache Spark PageRank ms < Lower Is Better RPi5 8GB Raspbian CPUFreq-Performance OfficialActiveCooler PSU-27W Run02 . 9243.3 | Renaissance 0.14 Test: Savina Reactors.IO ms < Lower Is Better RPi5 8GB Raspbian CPUFreq-Performance OfficialActiveCooler PSU-27W Run02 . 12438.1 | Renaissance 0.14 Test: Apache Spark Bayes ms < Lower Is Better RPi5 8GB Raspbian CPUFreq-Performance OfficialActiveCooler PSU-27W Run02 . 30332.5 | Renaissance 0.14 Test: Apache Spark ALS ms < Lower Is Better RPi5 8GB Raspbian CPUFreq-Performance OfficialActiveCooler PSU-27W Run02 . 10200.0 | Renaissance 0.14 Test: Scala Dotty ms < Lower Is Better RPi5 8GB Raspbian CPUFreq-Performance OfficialActiveCooler PSU-27W Run02 . 2494.0 | DaCapo Benchmark 23.11 Java Test: Tradesoap msec < Lower Is Better RPi5 8GB Raspbian CPUFreq-Performance OfficialActiveCooler PSU-27W Run02 . 7980 | DaCapo Benchmark 23.11 Java Test: Eclipse msec < Lower Is Better RPi5 8GB Raspbian CPUFreq-Performance OfficialActiveCooler PSU-27W Run02 . 26355 | DaCapo Benchmark 23.11 Java Test: Jython msec < Lower Is Better RPi5 8GB Raspbian CPUFreq-Performance OfficialActiveCooler PSU-27W Run02 . 8461 | DaCapo Benchmark 23.11 Java Test: H2 msec < Lower Is Better RPi5 8GB Raspbian CPUFreq-Performance OfficialActiveCooler PSU-27W Run02 . 17668 | Bork File Encrypter 1.4 File Encryption Time Seconds < Lower Is Better RPi5 8GB Raspbian CPUFreq-Performance OfficialActiveCooler PSU-27W Run02 . 13.46 | Java SciMark 2.2 Computational Test: Jacobi Successive Over-Relaxation Mflops > Higher Is Better RPi5 8GB Raspbian CPUFreq-Performance OfficialActiveCooler PSU-27W Run02 . 1071.48 | Java SciMark 2.2 Computational Test: Dense LU Matrix Factorization Mflops > Higher Is Better RPi5 8GB Raspbian CPUFreq-Performance OfficialActiveCooler PSU-27W Run02 . 470.65 | Java SciMark 2.2 Computational Test: Sparse Matrix Multiply Mflops > Higher Is Better RPi5 8GB Raspbian CPUFreq-Performance OfficialActiveCooler PSU-27W Run02 . 987.12 | Java SciMark 2.2 Computational Test: Monte Carlo Mflops > Higher Is Better RPi5 8GB Raspbian CPUFreq-Performance OfficialActiveCooler PSU-27W Run02 . 730.11 | Java SciMark 2.2 Computational Test: Composite Mflops > Higher Is Better RPi5 8GB Raspbian CPUFreq-Performance OfficialActiveCooler PSU-27W Run02 . 661.04 | simdjson 2.0 Throughput Test: DistinctUserID GB/s > Higher Is Better RPi5 8GB Raspbian CPUFreq-Performance OfficialActiveCooler PSU-27W Run02 . 1.48 | simdjson 2.0 Throughput Test: PartialTweets GB/s > Higher Is Better RPi5 8GB Raspbian CPUFreq-Performance OfficialActiveCooler PSU-27W Run02 . 1.47 | simdjson 2.0 Throughput Test: LargeRandom GB/s > Higher Is Better RPi5 8GB Raspbian CPUFreq-Performance OfficialActiveCooler PSU-27W Run02 . 0.47 | simdjson 2.0 Throughput Test: TopTweet GB/s > Higher Is Better RPi5 8GB Raspbian CPUFreq-Performance OfficialActiveCooler PSU-27W Run02 . 1.5 | simdjson 2.0 Throughput Test: Kostya GB/s > Higher Is Better RPi5 8GB Raspbian CPUFreq-Performance OfficialActiveCooler PSU-27W Run02 . 1.06 | libgav1 0.17 Video Input: Chimera 1080p 10-bit FPS > Higher Is Better RPi5 8GB Raspbian CPUFreq-Performance OfficialActiveCooler PSU-27W Run02 . 24.32 | libgav1 0.17 Video Input: Summer Nature 1080p FPS > Higher Is Better RPi5 8GB Raspbian CPUFreq-Performance OfficialActiveCooler PSU-27W Run02 . 74.42 | libgav1 0.17 Video Input: Summer Nature 4K FPS > Higher Is Better RPi5 8GB Raspbian CPUFreq-Performance OfficialActiveCooler PSU-27W Run02 . 16.66 | libgav1 0.17 Video Input: Chimera 1080p FPS > Higher Is Better RPi5 8GB Raspbian CPUFreq-Performance OfficialActiveCooler PSU-27W Run02 . 63.96 | FFmpeg 6.1 Encoder: libx265 - Scenario: Video On Demand FPS > Higher Is Better RPi5 8GB Raspbian CPUFreq-Performance OfficialActiveCooler PSU-27W Run02 . 9.58 | FFmpeg 6.1 Encoder: libx264 - Scenario: Video On Demand FPS > Higher Is Better RPi5 8GB Raspbian CPUFreq-Performance OfficialActiveCooler PSU-27W Run02 . 18.70 | FFmpeg 6.1 Encoder: libx265 - Scenario: Platform FPS > Higher Is Better RPi5 8GB Raspbian CPUFreq-Performance OfficialActiveCooler PSU-27W Run02 . 9.59 | FFmpeg 6.1 Encoder: libx264 - Scenario: Platform FPS > Higher Is Better RPi5 8GB Raspbian CPUFreq-Performance OfficialActiveCooler PSU-27W Run02 . 18.68 | FFmpeg 6.1 Encoder: libx265 - Scenario: Upload FPS > Higher Is Better RPi5 8GB Raspbian CPUFreq-Performance OfficialActiveCooler PSU-27W Run02 . 4.86 | FFmpeg 6.1 Encoder: libx264 - Scenario: Upload FPS > Higher Is Better RPi5 8GB Raspbian CPUFreq-Performance OfficialActiveCooler PSU-27W Run02 . 5.17 | FFmpeg 6.1 Encoder: libx265 - Scenario: Live FPS > Higher Is Better RPi5 8GB Raspbian CPUFreq-Performance OfficialActiveCooler PSU-27W Run02 . 26.78 | FFmpeg 6.1 Encoder: libx264 - Scenario: Live FPS > Higher Is Better RPi5 8GB Raspbian CPUFreq-Performance OfficialActiveCooler PSU-27W Run02 . 68.10 | Timed MAFFT Alignment 7.471 Multiple Sequence Alignment - LSU RNA Seconds < Lower Is Better RPi5 8GB Raspbian CPUFreq-Performance OfficialActiveCooler PSU-27W Run02 . 58.53 | Timed MrBayes Analysis 3.2.7 Primate Phylogeny Analysis Seconds < Lower Is Better RPi5 8GB Raspbian CPUFreq-Performance OfficialActiveCooler PSU-27W Run02 . 412.84 | FFTW 3.3.6 Build: Stock - Size: 2D FFT Size 4096 Mflops > Higher Is Better RPi5 8GB Raspbian CPUFreq-Performance OfficialActiveCooler PSU-27W Run02 . 206.63 | FFTW 3.3.6 Build: Stock - Size: 1D FFT Size 4096 Mflops > Higher Is Better RPi5 8GB Raspbian CPUFreq-Performance OfficialActiveCooler PSU-27W Run02 . 4871.1 | FFTW 3.3.6 Build: Stock - Size: 2D FFT Size 32 Mflops > Higher Is Better RPi5 8GB Raspbian CPUFreq-Performance OfficialActiveCooler PSU-27W Run02 . 6031.3 | FFTW 3.3.6 Build: Stock - Size: 1D FFT Size 32 Mflops > Higher Is Better RPi5 8GB Raspbian CPUFreq-Performance OfficialActiveCooler PSU-27W Run02 . 5707.3 | FFTE 7.0 Test: N=256, 1D Complex FFT Routine MFLOPS > Higher Is Better RPi5 8GB Raspbian CPUFreq-Performance OfficialActiveCooler PSU-27W Run02 . 2293.83 | libxsmm 2-1.17-3645 M N K: 64 GFLOPS/s > Higher Is Better RPi5 8GB Raspbian CPUFreq-Performance OfficialActiveCooler PSU-27W Run02 . 18.3 | libxsmm 2-1.17-3645 M N K: 32 GFLOPS/s > Higher Is Better RPi5 8GB Raspbian CPUFreq-Performance OfficialActiveCooler PSU-27W Run02 . 9.3 | libxsmm 2-1.17-3645 M N K: 256 GFLOPS/s > Higher Is Better RPi5 8GB Raspbian CPUFreq-Performance OfficialActiveCooler PSU-27W Run02 . 14.3 | libxsmm 2-1.17-3645 M N K: 128 GFLOPS/s > Higher Is Better RPi5 8GB Raspbian CPUFreq-Performance OfficialActiveCooler PSU-27W Run02 . 27.7 | lzbench 1.8 Test: Libdeflate 1 - Process: Decompression MB/s > Higher Is Better RPi5 8GB Raspbian CPUFreq-Performance OfficialActiveCooler PSU-27W Run02 . 671 | lzbench 1.8 Test: Libdeflate 1 - Process: Compression MB/s > Higher Is Better RPi5 8GB Raspbian CPUFreq-Performance OfficialActiveCooler PSU-27W Run02 . 147 | lzbench 1.8 Test: Brotli 0 - Process: Decompression MB/s > Higher Is Better RPi5 8GB Raspbian CPUFreq-Performance OfficialActiveCooler PSU-27W Run02 . 376 | lzbench 1.8 Test: Brotli 0 - Process: Compression MB/s > Higher Is Better RPi5 8GB Raspbian CPUFreq-Performance OfficialActiveCooler PSU-27W Run02 . 315 | lzbench 1.8 Test: Zstd 1 - Process: Decompression MB/s > Higher Is Better RPi5 8GB Raspbian CPUFreq-Performance OfficialActiveCooler PSU-27W Run02 . 743 | lzbench 1.8 Test: Zstd 1 - Process: Compression MB/s > Higher Is Better RPi5 8GB Raspbian CPUFreq-Performance OfficialActiveCooler PSU-27W Run02 . 330 | lzbench 1.8 Test: XZ 0 - Process: Decompression MB/s > Higher Is Better RPi5 8GB Raspbian CPUFreq-Performance OfficialActiveCooler PSU-27W Run02 . 95 | lzbench 1.8 Test: XZ 0 - Process: Compression MB/s > Higher Is Better RPi5 8GB Raspbian CPUFreq-Performance OfficialActiveCooler PSU-27W Run02 . 28 | Dolfyn 0.527 Computational Fluid Dynamics Seconds < Lower Is Better RPi5 8GB Raspbian CPUFreq-Performance OfficialActiveCooler PSU-27W Run02 . 35.13 | CLOMP 1.2 Static OMP Speedup Speedup > Higher Is Better RPi5 8GB Raspbian CPUFreq-Performance OfficialActiveCooler PSU-27W Run02 . 0.9 | Rodinia 3.1 Test: OpenMP Streamcluster Seconds < Lower Is Better RPi5 8GB Raspbian CPUFreq-Performance OfficialActiveCooler PSU-27W Run02 . 90.22 | Rodinia 3.1 Test: OpenMP CFD Solver Seconds < Lower Is Better RPi5 8GB Raspbian CPUFreq-Performance OfficialActiveCooler PSU-27W Run02 . 152.76 | Rodinia 3.1 Test: OpenMP LavaMD Seconds < Lower Is Better RPi5 8GB Raspbian CPUFreq-Performance OfficialActiveCooler PSU-27W Run02 . 867.80 | CloverLeaf 1.3 Input: clover_bm16 Seconds < Lower Is Better RPi5 8GB Raspbian CPUFreq-Performance OfficialActiveCooler PSU-27W Run02 . 22577.38 | CloverLeaf 1.3 Input: clover_bm Seconds < Lower Is Better RPi5 8GB Raspbian CPUFreq-Performance OfficialActiveCooler PSU-27W Run02 . 1269.53 | miniBUDE 20210901 Implementation: OpenMP - Input Deck: BM2 Billion Interactions/s > Higher Is Better RPi5 8GB Raspbian CPUFreq-Performance OfficialActiveCooler PSU-27W Run02 . 1.5 | miniBUDE 20210901 Implementation: OpenMP - Input Deck: BM2 GFInst/s > Higher Is Better RPi5 8GB Raspbian CPUFreq-Performance OfficialActiveCooler PSU-27W Run02 . 37.49 | miniBUDE 20210901 Implementation: OpenMP - Input Deck: BM1 Billion Interactions/s > Higher Is Better RPi5 8GB Raspbian CPUFreq-Performance OfficialActiveCooler PSU-27W Run02 . 1.497 | miniBUDE 20210901 Implementation: OpenMP - Input Deck: BM1 GFInst/s > Higher Is Better RPi5 8GB Raspbian CPUFreq-Performance OfficialActiveCooler PSU-27W Run02 . 37.42 | Etcpak 1.0 Benchmark: Single-Threaded - Configuration: ETC2 Mpx/s > Higher Is Better RPi5 8GB Raspbian CPUFreq-Performance OfficialActiveCooler PSU-27W Run02 . 50.90 | Etcpak 1.0 Benchmark: Single-Threaded - Configuration: DXT1 Mpx/s > Higher Is Better RPi5 8GB Raspbian CPUFreq-Performance OfficialActiveCooler PSU-27W Run02 . 51.43 | Etcpak 1.0 Benchmark: Multi-Threaded - Configuration: ETC2 Mpx/s > Higher Is Better RPi5 8GB Raspbian CPUFreq-Performance OfficialActiveCooler PSU-27W Run02 . 190.36 | Etcpak 1.0 Benchmark: Multi-Threaded - Configuration: DXT1 Mpx/s > Higher Is Better RPi5 8GB Raspbian CPUFreq-Performance OfficialActiveCooler PSU-27W Run02 . 191.25 | Crypto++ 8.8 Test: Unkeyed Algorithms MiB/second > Higher Is Better RPi5 8GB Raspbian CPUFreq-Performance OfficialActiveCooler PSU-27W Run02 . 323.25 | Crypto++ 8.8 Test: Keyed Algorithms MiB/second > Higher Is Better RPi5 8GB Raspbian CPUFreq-Performance OfficialActiveCooler PSU-27W Run02 . 321.60 | Crypto++ 8.8 Test: All Algorithms MiB/second > Higher Is Better RPi5 8GB Raspbian CPUFreq-Performance OfficialActiveCooler PSU-27W Run02 . 754.92 | C-Blosc 2.11 Test: blosclz bitshuffle - Buffer Size: 256MB MB/s > Higher Is Better RPi5 8GB Raspbian CPUFreq-Performance OfficialActiveCooler PSU-27W Run02 . 772.4 | C-Blosc 2.11 Test: blosclz bitshuffle - Buffer Size: 128MB MB/s > Higher Is Better RPi5 8GB Raspbian CPUFreq-Performance OfficialActiveCooler PSU-27W Run02 . 813.7 | C-Blosc 2.11 Test: blosclz noshuffle - Buffer Size: 256MB MB/s > Higher Is Better RPi5 8GB Raspbian CPUFreq-Performance OfficialActiveCooler PSU-27W Run02 . 1060.3 | C-Blosc 2.11 Test: blosclz noshuffle - Buffer Size: 128MB MB/s > Higher Is Better RPi5 8GB Raspbian CPUFreq-Performance OfficialActiveCooler PSU-27W Run02 . 1128.0 | C-Blosc 2.11 Test: blosclz bitshuffle - Buffer Size: 64MB MB/s > Higher Is Better RPi5 8GB Raspbian CPUFreq-Performance OfficialActiveCooler PSU-27W Run02 . 847.2 | C-Blosc 2.11 Test: blosclz bitshuffle - Buffer Size: 32MB MB/s > Higher Is Better RPi5 8GB Raspbian CPUFreq-Performance OfficialActiveCooler PSU-27W Run02 . 872.5 | C-Blosc 2.11 Test: blosclz bitshuffle - Buffer Size: 16MB MB/s > Higher Is Better RPi5 8GB Raspbian CPUFreq-Performance OfficialActiveCooler PSU-27W Run02 . 883.5 | C-Blosc 2.11 Test: blosclz noshuffle - Buffer Size: 64MB MB/s > Higher Is Better RPi5 8GB Raspbian CPUFreq-Performance OfficialActiveCooler PSU-27W Run02 . 1201.5 | C-Blosc 2.11 Test: blosclz noshuffle - Buffer Size: 32MB MB/s > Higher Is Better RPi5 8GB Raspbian CPUFreq-Performance OfficialActiveCooler PSU-27W Run02 . 1246.4 | C-Blosc 2.11 Test: blosclz noshuffle - Buffer Size: 16MB MB/s > Higher Is Better RPi5 8GB Raspbian CPUFreq-Performance OfficialActiveCooler PSU-27W Run02 . 1280.0 | C-Blosc 2.11 Test: blosclz bitshuffle - Buffer Size: 8MB MB/s > Higher Is Better RPi5 8GB Raspbian CPUFreq-Performance OfficialActiveCooler PSU-27W Run02 . 901.9 | C-Blosc 2.11 Test: blosclz shuffle - Buffer Size: 256MB MB/s > Higher Is Better RPi5 8GB Raspbian CPUFreq-Performance OfficialActiveCooler PSU-27W Run02 . 1402.9 | C-Blosc 2.11 Test: blosclz shuffle - Buffer Size: 128MB MB/s > Higher Is Better RPi5 8GB Raspbian CPUFreq-Performance OfficialActiveCooler PSU-27W Run02 . 1542.6 | C-Blosc 2.11 Test: blosclz noshuffle - Buffer Size: 8MB MB/s > Higher Is Better RPi5 8GB Raspbian CPUFreq-Performance OfficialActiveCooler PSU-27W Run02 . 1311.8 | C-Blosc 2.11 Test: blosclz shuffle - Buffer Size: 64MB MB/s > Higher Is Better RPi5 8GB Raspbian CPUFreq-Performance OfficialActiveCooler PSU-27W Run02 . 1694.5 | C-Blosc 2.11 Test: blosclz shuffle - Buffer Size: 32MB MB/s > Higher Is Better RPi5 8GB Raspbian CPUFreq-Performance OfficialActiveCooler PSU-27W Run02 . 1778.7 | C-Blosc 2.11 Test: blosclz shuffle - Buffer Size: 16MB MB/s > Higher Is Better RPi5 8GB Raspbian CPUFreq-Performance OfficialActiveCooler PSU-27W Run02 . 1815.6 | C-Blosc 2.11 Test: blosclz shuffle - Buffer Size: 8MB MB/s > Higher Is Better RPi5 8GB Raspbian CPUFreq-Performance OfficialActiveCooler PSU-27W Run02 . 1942.2 | Sockperf 3.7 Test: Latency Ping Pong usec < Lower Is Better RPi5 8GB Raspbian CPUFreq-Performance OfficialActiveCooler PSU-27W Run02 . 7.178 | Sockperf 3.7 Test: Throughput Messages Per Second > Higher Is Better RPi5 8GB Raspbian CPUFreq-Performance OfficialActiveCooler PSU-27W Run02 . 225891 | t-test1 2017-01-13 Threads: 2 Seconds < Lower Is Better RPi5 8GB Raspbian CPUFreq-Performance OfficialActiveCooler PSU-27W Run02 . 27.13 | t-test1 2017-01-13 Threads: 1 Seconds < Lower Is Better RPi5 8GB Raspbian CPUFreq-Performance OfficialActiveCooler PSU-27W Run02 . 59.59 | MBW 2018-09-08 Test: Memory Copy, Fixed Block Size - Array Size: 1024 MiB MiB/s > Higher Is Better RPi5 8GB Raspbian CPUFreq-Performance OfficialActiveCooler PSU-27W Run02 . 5123.69 | MBW 2018-09-08 Test: Memory Copy, Fixed Block Size - Array Size: 128 MiB MiB/s > Higher Is Better RPi5 8GB Raspbian CPUFreq-Performance OfficialActiveCooler PSU-27W Run02 . 5145.88 | MBW 2018-09-08 Test: Memory Copy - Array Size: 1024 MiB MiB/s > Higher Is Better RPi5 8GB Raspbian CPUFreq-Performance OfficialActiveCooler PSU-27W Run02 . 5207.63 | MBW 2018-09-08 Test: Memory Copy - Array Size: 128 MiB MiB/s > Higher Is Better RPi5 8GB Raspbian CPUFreq-Performance OfficialActiveCooler PSU-27W Run02 . 5113.66 | Tinymembench 2018-05-28 Standard Memset MB/s > Higher Is Better RPi5 8GB Raspbian CPUFreq-Performance OfficialActiveCooler PSU-27W Run02 . 11932.8 | Tinymembench 2018-05-28 Standard Memcpy MB/s > Higher Is Better RPi5 8GB Raspbian CPUFreq-Performance OfficialActiveCooler PSU-27W Run02 . 5171.1 | Stream 2013-01-17 Type: Triad MB/s > Higher Is Better RPi5 8GB Raspbian CPUFreq-Performance OfficialActiveCooler PSU-27W Run02 . 4004.3 | Stream 2013-01-17 Type: Scale MB/s > Higher Is Better RPi5 8GB Raspbian CPUFreq-Performance OfficialActiveCooler PSU-27W Run02 . 5620.1 | RAMspeed SMP 3.5.0 Type: Average - Benchmark: Floating Point MB/s > Higher Is Better RPi5 8GB Raspbian CPUFreq-Performance OfficialActiveCooler PSU-27W Run02 . 6182.24 | RAMspeed SMP 3.5.0 Type: Triad - Benchmark: Floating Point MB/s > Higher Is Better RPi5 8GB Raspbian CPUFreq-Performance OfficialActiveCooler PSU-27W Run02 . 3108.88 | RAMspeed SMP 3.5.0 Type: Scale - Benchmark: Floating Point MB/s > Higher Is Better RPi5 8GB Raspbian CPUFreq-Performance OfficialActiveCooler PSU-27W Run02 . 7494.26 | RAMspeed SMP 3.5.0 Type: Copy - Benchmark: Floating Point MB/s > Higher Is Better RPi5 8GB Raspbian CPUFreq-Performance OfficialActiveCooler PSU-27W Run02 . 7456.91 | RAMspeed SMP 3.5.0 Type: Add - Benchmark: Floating Point MB/s > Higher Is Better RPi5 8GB Raspbian CPUFreq-Performance OfficialActiveCooler PSU-27W Run02 . 6673.08 | RAMspeed SMP 3.5.0 Type: Average - Benchmark: Integer MB/s > Higher Is Better RPi5 8GB Raspbian CPUFreq-Performance OfficialActiveCooler PSU-27W Run02 . 6105.99 | RAMspeed SMP 3.5.0 Type: Triad - Benchmark: Integer MB/s > Higher Is Better RPi5 8GB Raspbian CPUFreq-Performance OfficialActiveCooler PSU-27W Run02 . 2911.25 | RAMspeed SMP 3.5.0 Type: Scale - Benchmark: Integer MB/s > Higher Is Better RPi5 8GB Raspbian CPUFreq-Performance OfficialActiveCooler PSU-27W Run02 . 7382.77 | RAMspeed SMP 3.5.0 Type: Copy - Benchmark: Integer MB/s > Higher Is Better RPi5 8GB Raspbian CPUFreq-Performance OfficialActiveCooler PSU-27W Run02 . 7452.77 | RAMspeed SMP 3.5.0 Type: Add - Benchmark: Integer MB/s > Higher Is Better RPi5 8GB Raspbian CPUFreq-Performance OfficialActiveCooler PSU-27W Run02 . 6706.18 | PostMark 1.51 Disk Transaction Performance TPS > Higher Is Better RPi5 8GB Raspbian CPUFreq-Performance OfficialActiveCooler PSU-27W Run02 . 3099 | Dbench 4.0 1 Clients MB/s > Higher Is Better RPi5 8GB Raspbian CPUFreq-Performance OfficialActiveCooler PSU-27W Run02 . 232.18 | Dbench 4.0 12 Clients MB/s > Higher Is Better RPi5 8GB Raspbian CPUFreq-Performance OfficialActiveCooler PSU-27W Run02 . 778.25 | BlogBench 1.1 Test: Write Final Score > Higher Is Better RPi5 8GB Raspbian CPUFreq-Performance OfficialActiveCooler PSU-27W Run02 . 2582 | SQLite 3.41.2 Threads / Copies: 4 Seconds < Lower Is Better RPi5 8GB Raspbian CPUFreq-Performance OfficialActiveCooler PSU-27W Run02 . 43.59 | SQLite 3.41.2 Threads / Copies: 2 Seconds < Lower Is Better RPi5 8GB Raspbian CPUFreq-Performance OfficialActiveCooler PSU-27W Run02 . 31.65 | SQLite 3.41.2 Threads / Copies: 1 Seconds < Lower Is Better RPi5 8GB Raspbian CPUFreq-Performance OfficialActiveCooler PSU-27W Run02 . 19.01 | SQLite 3.30.1 Threads / Copies: 1 Seconds < Lower Is Better RPi5 8GB Raspbian CPUFreq-Performance OfficialActiveCooler PSU-27W Run02 . 19.08 | TTSIOD 3D Renderer 2.3b FPS > Higher Is Better QuadRay 2022.05.25 Scene: 5 - Resolution: 1080p FPS > Higher Is Better QuadRay 2022.05.25 Scene: 3 - Resolution: 1080p FPS > Higher Is Better QuadRay 2022.05.25 Scene: 2 - Resolution: 1080p FPS > Higher Is Better QuadRay 2022.05.25 Scene: 1 - Resolution: 1080p FPS > Higher Is Better QuadRay 2022.05.25 Scene: 5 - Resolution: 4K FPS > Higher Is Better QuadRay 2022.05.25 Scene: 3 - Resolution: 4K FPS > Higher Is Better QuadRay 2022.05.25 Scene: 2 - Resolution: 4K FPS > Higher Is Better QuadRay 2022.05.25 Scene: 1 - Resolution: 4K FPS > Higher Is Better Open FMM Nero2D 2.0.2 Seconds < Lower Is Better Node.js Express HTTP Load Test Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better WebP2 Image Encode 20220823 Encode Settings: Quality 100, Lossless Compression MP/s > Higher Is Better Renaissance 0.14 Test: In-Memory Database Shootout ms < Lower Is Better Renaissance 0.14 Test: Twitter Finagle ms < Lower Is Better RPi5 8GB Raspbian CPUFreq-Performance OfficialActiveCooler PSU-27W Run02 . 5226.0 | DaCapo Benchmark 23.11 Java Test: Tradebeans msec < Lower Is Better RPi5 8GB Raspbian CPUFreq-Performance OfficialActiveCooler PSU-27W Run02 . 11673 | Java Gradle Build Gradle Build: Reactor Seconds < Lower Is Better Java SciMark 2.2 Computational Test: Fast Fourier Transform Mflops > Higher Is Better RPi5 8GB Raspbian CPUFreq-Performance OfficialActiveCooler PSU-27W Run02 . 45.81 | Chia Blockchain VDF 1.0.7 Test: Square Assembly Optimized IPS > Higher Is Better Chia Blockchain VDF 1.0.7 Test: Square Plain C++ IPS > Higher Is Better Xmrig 6.21 Variant: CryptoNight-Femto UPX2 - Hash Count: 1M H/s > Higher Is Better Xmrig 6.21 Variant: CryptoNight-Heavy - Hash Count: 1M H/s > Higher Is Better Xmrig 6.21 Variant: GhostRider - Hash Count: 1M H/s > Higher Is Better Xmrig 6.21 Variant: Wownero - Hash Count: 1M H/s > Higher Is Better Xmrig 6.21 Variant: Monero - Hash Count: 1M H/s > Higher Is Better Xmrig 6.21 Variant: KawPow - Hash Count: 1M H/s > Higher Is Better Go Benchmarks Test: garbage Nanoseconds/Operation < Lower Is Better Go Benchmarks Test: build Nanoseconds/Operation < Lower Is Better Go Benchmarks Test: json Nanoseconds/Operation < Lower Is Better Go Benchmarks Test: http Nanoseconds/Operation < Lower Is Better BLAKE2 20170307 Cycles Per Byte < Lower Is Better LULESH 2.0.3 z/s > Higher Is Better LAMMPS Molecular Dynamics Simulator 23Jun2022 Model: Rhodopsin Protein ns/day > Higher Is Better LAMMPS Molecular Dynamics Simulator 23Jun2022 Test: Rhodopsin Protein ns/day > Higher Is Better LAMMPS Molecular Dynamics Simulator 23Jun2022 Model: 20k Atoms ns/day > Higher Is Better nekRS 23.0 Input: TurboPipe Periodic flops/rank > Higher Is Better nekRS 23.0 Input: Kershaw flops/rank > Higher Is Better SPECFEM3D 4.0 Model: Water-layered Halfspace Seconds < Lower Is Better SPECFEM3D 4.0 Model: Homogeneous Halfspace Seconds < Lower Is Better SPECFEM3D 4.0 Model: Tomographic Model Seconds < Lower Is Better SPECFEM3D 4.0 Model: Layered Halfspace Seconds < Lower Is Better SPECFEM3D 4.0 Model: Mount St. Helens Seconds < Lower Is Better Remhos 1.0 Test: Sample Remap Example Seconds < Lower Is Better Quantum ESPRESSO 7.0 Input: AUSURF112 Seconds < Lower Is Better OpenFOAM 10 Input: drivaerFastback, Medium Mesh Size Seconds < Lower Is Better OpenFOAM 10 Input: drivaerFastback, Small Mesh Size Seconds < Lower Is Better OpenFOAM 10 Input: drivaerFastback, Large Mesh Size Seconds < Lower Is Better OpenFOAM 10 Input: motorBike Seconds < Lower Is Better Monte Carlo Simulations of Ionised Nebulae 2.02.73.3 Input: Dust 2D tau100.0 Seconds < Lower Is Better Monte Carlo Simulations of Ionised Nebulae 2.02.73.3 Input: Gas HII40 Seconds < Lower Is Better Xcompact3d Incompact3d 2021-03-11 Input: input.i3d 193 Cells Per Direction Seconds < Lower Is Better Xcompact3d Incompact3d 2021-03-11 Input: input.i3d 129 Cells Per Direction Seconds < Lower Is Better Xcompact3d Incompact3d 2021-03-11 Input: X3D-benchmarking input.i3d Seconds < Lower Is Better Timed HMMer Search 3.3.2 Seconds < Lower Is Better QMCPACK 3.17.1 Input: FeCO6_b3lyp_gms Total Execution Time - Seconds < Lower Is Better QMCPACK 3.17.1 Input: O_ae_pyscf_UHF Total Execution Time - Seconds < Lower Is Better QMCPACK 3.17.1 Input: simple-H2O Total Execution Time - Seconds < Lower Is Better QMCPACK 3.17.1 Input: LiH_ae_MSD Total Execution Time - Seconds < Lower Is Better QMCPACK 3.17.1 Input: Li2_STO_ae Total Execution Time - Seconds < Lower Is Better QMCPACK 3.17.1 Input: H4_ae Total Execution Time - Seconds < Lower Is Better NWChem 7.0.2 Seconds < Lower Is Better Palabos 2.3 Grid Size: 4000 Mega Site Updates Per Second > Higher Is Better Palabos 2.3 Grid Size: 1000 Mega Site Updates Per Second > Higher Is Better Palabos 2.3 Grid Size: 500 Mega Site Updates Per Second > Higher Is Better Palabos 2.3 Grid Size: 400 Mega Site Updates Per Second > Higher Is Better Palabos 2.3 Grid Size: 100 Mega Site Updates Per Second > Higher Is Better Pennant 1.0.1 Test: leblancbig Hydro Cycle Time - Seconds < Lower Is Better Pennant 1.0.1 Test: sedovbig Hydro Cycle Time - Seconds < Lower Is Better HeFFTe - Highly Efficient FFT for Exascale 2.4 Test: r2c - Backend: Stock - Precision: double-long - X Y Z: 1024 GFLOP/s > Higher Is Better HeFFTe - Highly Efficient FFT for Exascale 2.4 Test: c2c - Backend: Stock - Precision: double-long - X Y Z: 1024 GFLOP/s > Higher Is Better HeFFTe - Highly Efficient FFT for Exascale 2.4 Test: r2c - Backend: Stock - Precision: float-long - X Y Z: 1024 GFLOP/s > Higher Is Better HeFFTe - Highly Efficient FFT for Exascale 2.4 Test: r2c - Backend: Stock - Precision: double-long - X Y Z: 512 GFLOP/s > Higher Is Better HeFFTe - Highly Efficient FFT for Exascale 2.4 Test: r2c - Backend: Stock - Precision: double-long - X Y Z: 256 GFLOP/s > Higher Is Better HeFFTe - Highly Efficient FFT for Exascale 2.4 Test: r2c - Backend: Stock - Precision: double-long - X Y Z: 128 GFLOP/s > Higher Is Better HeFFTe - Highly Efficient FFT for Exascale 2.4 Test: r2c - Backend: FFTW - Precision: double-long - X Y Z: 1024 GFLOP/s > Higher Is Better HeFFTe - Highly Efficient FFT for Exascale 2.4 Test: c2c - Backend: Stock - Precision: float-long - X Y Z: 1024 GFLOP/s > Higher Is Better HeFFTe - Highly Efficient FFT for Exascale 2.4 Test: c2c - Backend: Stock - Precision: double-long - X Y Z: 512 GFLOP/s > Higher Is Better HeFFTe - Highly Efficient FFT for Exascale 2.4 Test: c2c - Backend: Stock - Precision: double-long - X Y Z: 256 GFLOP/s > Higher Is Better HeFFTe - Highly Efficient FFT for Exascale 2.4 Test: c2c - Backend: Stock - Precision: double-long - X Y Z: 128 GFLOP/s > Higher Is Better HeFFTe - Highly Efficient FFT for Exascale 2.4 Test: c2c - Backend: FFTW - Precision: double-long - X Y Z: 1024 GFLOP/s > Higher Is Better HeFFTe - Highly Efficient FFT for Exascale 2.4 Test: r2c - Backend: Stock - Precision: float-long - X Y Z: 512 GFLOP/s > Higher Is Better HeFFTe - Highly Efficient FFT for Exascale 2.4 Test: r2c - Backend: Stock - Precision: float-long - X Y Z: 256 GFLOP/s > Higher Is Better HeFFTe - Highly Efficient FFT for Exascale 2.4 Test: r2c - Backend: Stock - Precision: float-long - X Y Z: 128 GFLOP/s > Higher Is Better HeFFTe - Highly Efficient FFT for Exascale 2.4 Test: r2c - Backend: FFTW - Precision: float-long - X Y Z: 1024 GFLOP/s > Higher Is Better HeFFTe - Highly Efficient FFT for Exascale 2.4 Test: r2c - Backend: FFTW - Precision: double-long - X Y Z: 512 GFLOP/s > Higher Is Better HeFFTe - Highly Efficient FFT for Exascale 2.4 Test: r2c - Backend: FFTW - Precision: double-long - X Y Z: 256 GFLOP/s > Higher Is Better HeFFTe - Highly Efficient FFT for Exascale 2.4 Test: r2c - Backend: FFTW - Precision: double-long - X Y Z: 128 GFLOP/s > Higher Is Better HeFFTe - Highly Efficient FFT for Exascale 2.4 Test: c2c - Backend: Stock - Precision: float-long - X Y Z: 512 GFLOP/s > Higher Is Better HeFFTe - Highly Efficient FFT for Exascale 2.4 Test: c2c - Backend: Stock - Precision: float-long - X Y Z: 256 GFLOP/s > Higher Is Better HeFFTe - Highly Efficient FFT for Exascale 2.4 Test: c2c - Backend: Stock - Precision: float-long - X Y Z: 128 GFLOP/s > Higher Is Better HeFFTe - Highly Efficient FFT for Exascale 2.4 Test: c2c - Backend: FFTW - Precision: float-long - X Y Z: 1024 GFLOP/s > Higher Is Better HeFFTe - Highly Efficient FFT for Exascale 2.4 Test: c2c - Backend: FFTW - Precision: double-long - X Y Z: 512 GFLOP/s > Higher Is Better HeFFTe - Highly Efficient FFT for Exascale 2.4 Test: c2c - Backend: FFTW - Precision: double-long - X Y Z: 256 GFLOP/s > Higher Is Better HeFFTe - Highly Efficient FFT for Exascale 2.4 Test: c2c - Backend: FFTW - Precision: double-long - X Y Z: 128 GFLOP/s > Higher Is Better HeFFTe - Highly Efficient FFT for Exascale 2.4 Test: r2c - Backend: FFTW - Precision: float-long - X Y Z: 512 GFLOP/s > Higher Is Better HeFFTe - Highly Efficient FFT for Exascale 2.4 Test: r2c - Backend: FFTW - Precision: float-long - X Y Z: 256 GFLOP/s > Higher Is Better HeFFTe - Highly Efficient FFT for Exascale 2.4 Test: r2c - Backend: FFTW - Precision: float-long - X Y Z: 128 GFLOP/s > Higher Is Better HeFFTe - Highly Efficient FFT for Exascale 2.4 Test: c2c - Backend: FFTW - Precision: float-long - X Y Z: 512 GFLOP/s > Higher Is Better HeFFTe - Highly Efficient FFT for Exascale 2.4 Test: c2c - Backend: FFTW - Precision: float-long - X Y Z: 256 GFLOP/s > Higher Is Better HeFFTe - Highly Efficient FFT for Exascale 2.4 Test: c2c - Backend: FFTW - Precision: float-long - X Y Z: 128 GFLOP/s > Higher Is Better HeFFTe - Highly Efficient FFT for Exascale 2.4 Test: r2c - Backend: Stock - Precision: double - X Y Z: 1024 GFLOP/s > Higher Is Better HeFFTe - Highly Efficient FFT for Exascale 2.4 Test: c2c - Backend: Stock - Precision: double - X Y Z: 1024 GFLOP/s > Higher Is Better HeFFTe - Highly Efficient FFT for Exascale 2.4 Test: r2c - Backend: Stock - Precision: float - X Y Z: 1024 GFLOP/s > Higher Is Better HeFFTe - Highly Efficient FFT for Exascale 2.4 Test: r2c - Backend: Stock - Precision: double - X Y Z: 512 GFLOP/s > Higher Is Better HeFFTe - Highly Efficient FFT for Exascale 2.4 Test: r2c - Backend: Stock - Precision: double - X Y Z: 256 GFLOP/s > Higher Is Better HeFFTe - Highly Efficient FFT for Exascale 2.4 Test: r2c - Backend: Stock - Precision: double - X Y Z: 128 GFLOP/s > Higher Is Better HeFFTe - Highly Efficient FFT for Exascale 2.4 Test: r2c - Backend: FFTW - Precision: double - X Y Z: 1024 GFLOP/s > Higher Is Better HeFFTe - Highly Efficient FFT for Exascale 2.4 Test: c2c - Backend: Stock - Precision: float - X Y Z: 1024 GFLOP/s > Higher Is Better HeFFTe - Highly Efficient FFT for Exascale 2.4 Test: c2c - Backend: Stock - Precision: double - X Y Z: 512 GFLOP/s > Higher Is Better HeFFTe - Highly Efficient FFT for Exascale 2.4 Test: c2c - Backend: Stock - Precision: double - X Y Z: 256 GFLOP/s > Higher Is Better HeFFTe - Highly Efficient FFT for Exascale 2.4 Test: c2c - Backend: Stock - Precision: double - X Y Z: 128 GFLOP/s > Higher Is Better HeFFTe - Highly Efficient FFT for Exascale 2.4 Test: c2c - Backend: FFTW - Precision: double - X Y Z: 1024 GFLOP/s > Higher Is Better HeFFTe - Highly Efficient FFT for Exascale 2.4 Test: r2c - Backend: Stock - Precision: float - X Y Z: 512 GFLOP/s > Higher Is Better HeFFTe - Highly Efficient FFT for Exascale 2.4 Test: r2c - Backend: Stock - Precision: float - X Y Z: 256 GFLOP/s > Higher Is Better HeFFTe - Highly Efficient FFT for Exascale 2.4 Test: r2c - Backend: Stock - Precision: float - X Y Z: 128 GFLOP/s > Higher Is Better HeFFTe - Highly Efficient FFT for Exascale 2.4 Test: r2c - Backend: FFTW - Precision: float - X Y Z: 1024 GFLOP/s > Higher Is Better HeFFTe - Highly Efficient FFT for Exascale 2.4 Test: r2c - Backend: FFTW - Precision: double - X Y Z: 512 GFLOP/s > Higher Is Better HeFFTe - Highly Efficient FFT for Exascale 2.4 Test: r2c - Backend: FFTW - Precision: double - X Y Z: 256 GFLOP/s > Higher Is Better HeFFTe - Highly Efficient FFT for Exascale 2.4 Test: r2c - Backend: FFTW - Precision: double - X Y Z: 128 GFLOP/s > Higher Is Better HeFFTe - Highly Efficient FFT for Exascale 2.4 Test: c2c - Backend: Stock - Precision: float - X Y Z: 512 GFLOP/s > Higher Is Better HeFFTe - Highly Efficient FFT for Exascale 2.4 Test: c2c - Backend: Stock - Precision: float - X Y Z: 256 GFLOP/s > Higher Is Better HeFFTe - Highly Efficient FFT for Exascale 2.4 Test: c2c - Backend: Stock - Precision: float - X Y Z: 128 GFLOP/s > Higher Is Better HeFFTe - Highly Efficient FFT for Exascale 2.4 Test: c2c - Backend: FFTW - Precision: float - X Y Z: 1024 GFLOP/s > Higher Is Better HeFFTe - Highly Efficient FFT for Exascale 2.4 Test: c2c - Backend: FFTW - Precision: double - X Y Z: 512 GFLOP/s > Higher Is Better HeFFTe - Highly Efficient FFT for Exascale 2.4 Test: c2c - Backend: FFTW - Precision: double - X Y Z: 256 GFLOP/s > Higher Is Better HeFFTe - Highly Efficient FFT for Exascale 2.4 Test: c2c - Backend: FFTW - Precision: double - X Y Z: 128 GFLOP/s > Higher Is Better HeFFTe - Highly Efficient FFT for Exascale 2.4 Test: r2c - Backend: FFTW - Precision: float - X Y Z: 512 GFLOP/s > Higher Is Better HeFFTe - Highly Efficient FFT for Exascale 2.4 Test: r2c - Backend: FFTW - Precision: float - X Y Z: 256 GFLOP/s > Higher Is Better HeFFTe - Highly Efficient FFT for Exascale 2.4 Test: r2c - Backend: FFTW - Precision: float - X Y Z: 128 GFLOP/s > Higher Is Better HeFFTe - Highly Efficient FFT for Exascale 2.4 Test: c2c - Backend: FFTW - Precision: float - X Y Z: 512 GFLOP/s > Higher Is Better HeFFTe - Highly Efficient FFT for Exascale 2.4 Test: c2c - Backend: FFTW - Precision: float - X Y Z: 256 GFLOP/s > Higher Is Better HeFFTe - Highly Efficient FFT for Exascale 2.4 Test: c2c - Backend: FFTW - Precision: float - X Y Z: 128 GFLOP/s > Higher Is Better FFTW 3.3.6 Build: Float + SSE - Size: 2D FFT Size 4096 Mflops > Higher Is Better FFTW 3.3.6 Build: Float + SSE - Size: 1D FFT Size 4096 Mflops > Higher Is Better FFTW 3.3.6 Build: Float + SSE - Size: 2D FFT Size 32 Mflops > Higher Is Better FFTW 3.3.6 Build: Float + SSE - Size: 1D FFT Size 32 Mflops > Higher Is Better Laghos 3.1 Test: Sedov Blast Wave, ube_922_hex.mesh Major Kernels Total Rate > Higher Is Better Laghos 3.1 Test: Triple Point Problem Major Kernels Total Rate > Higher Is Better Algebraic Multi-Grid Benchmark 1.2 Figure Of Merit > Higher Is Better SMHasher 2022-08-22 Hash: t1ha2_atonce SMHasher 2022-08-22 Hash: FarmHash128 SMHasher 2022-08-22 Hash: fasthash32 SMHasher 2022-08-22 Hash: Spooky32 SMHasher 2022-08-22 Hash: SHA3-256 SMHasher 2022-08-22 Hash: wyhash Nebular Empirical Analysis Tool 2.3 Seconds < Lower Is Better Rodinia 3.1 Test: OpenCL Particle Filter Seconds < Lower Is Better Rodinia 3.1 Test: OpenMP Leukocyte Seconds < Lower Is Better Rodinia 3.1 Test: OpenCL Leukocyte Seconds < Lower Is Better Rodinia 3.1 Test: OpenCL Heartwall Seconds < Lower Is Better Rodinia 3.1 Test: OpenCL Myocyte Seconds < Lower Is Better Rodinia 3.1 Test: OpenCL LavaMD Seconds < Lower Is Better CloverLeaf 1.3 Input: clover_bm64_short Seconds < Lower Is Better miniFE 2.2 Problem Size: Medium CG Mflops > Higher Is Better miniFE 2.2 Problem Size: Small CG Mflops > Higher Is Better miniFE 2.2 Problem Size: Large CG Mflops > Higher Is Better Parboil 2.5 Test: OpenMP MRI Gridding Seconds < Lower Is Better Parboil 2.5 Test: OpenCL MRI Gridding Seconds < Lower Is Better Parboil 2.5 Test: OpenMP Stencil Seconds < Lower Is Better Parboil 2.5 Test: OpenMP MRI-Q Seconds < Lower Is Better Parboil 2.5 Test: OpenMP CUTCP Seconds < Lower Is Better Parboil 2.5 Test: OpenCL TPACF Seconds < Lower Is Better Parboil 2.5 Test: OpenCL Histo Seconds < Lower Is Better Parboil 2.5 Test: OpenMP LBM Seconds < Lower Is Better Parboil 2.5 Test: OpenCL LBM Seconds < Lower Is Better Parboil 2.5 Test: OpenCL BFS Seconds < Lower Is Better LeelaChessZero 0.30 Backend: BLAS Nodes Per Second > Higher Is Better HPC Challenge 1.5.0 Test / Class: Max Ping Pong Bandwidth HPC Challenge 1.5.0 Test / Class: Random Ring Bandwidth HPC Challenge 1.5.0 Test / Class: Random Ring Latency HPC Challenge 1.5.0 Test / Class: G-Random Access HPC Challenge 1.5.0 Test / Class: EP-STREAM Triad HPC Challenge 1.5.0 Test / Class: G-Ptrans HPC Challenge 1.5.0 Test / Class: EP-DGEMM HPC Challenge 1.5.0 Test / Class: G-Ffte HPC Challenge 1.5.0 Test / Class: G-HPL NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4 Test / Class: SP.C Total Mop/s > Higher Is Better NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4 Test / Class: SP.B Total Mop/s > Higher Is Better NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4 Test / Class: SP.A Total Mop/s > Higher Is Better NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4 Test / Class: MG.C Total Mop/s > Higher Is Better NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4 Test / Class: LU.C Total Mop/s > Higher Is Better NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4 Test / Class: LU.A Total Mop/s > Higher Is Better NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4 Test / Class: IS.D Total Mop/s > Higher Is Better NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4 Test / Class: FT.C Total Mop/s > Higher Is Better NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4 Test / Class: FT.B Total Mop/s > Higher Is Better NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4 Test / Class: FT.A Total Mop/s > Higher Is Better NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4 Test / Class: EP.D Total Mop/s > Higher Is Better NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4 Test / Class: EP.C Total Mop/s > Higher Is Better NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4 Test / Class: CG.C Total Mop/s > Higher Is Better NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4 Test / Class: BT.C Total Mop/s > Higher Is Better NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4 Test / Class: BT.A Total Mop/s > Higher Is Better HPL Linpack 2.3 GFLOPS > Higher Is Better High Performance Conjugate Gradient 3.1 X Y Z: 192 192 192 - RT: 1800 GFLOP/s > Higher Is Better High Performance Conjugate Gradient 3.1 X Y Z: 160 160 160 - RT: 1800 GFLOP/s > Higher Is Better High Performance Conjugate Gradient 3.1 X Y Z: 144 144 144 - RT: 1800 GFLOP/s > Higher Is Better High Performance Conjugate Gradient 3.1 X Y Z: 104 104 104 - RT: 1800 GFLOP/s > Higher Is Better High Performance Conjugate Gradient 3.1 X Y Z: 192 192 192 - RT: 60 GFLOP/s > Higher Is Better High Performance Conjugate Gradient 3.1 X Y Z: 160 160 160 - RT: 60 GFLOP/s > Higher Is Better High Performance Conjugate Gradient 3.1 X Y Z: 144 144 144 - RT: 60 GFLOP/s > Higher Is Better High Performance Conjugate Gradient 3.1 X Y Z: 104 104 104 - RT: 60 GFLOP/s > Higher Is Better Glibc Benchmarks 2.37 Benchmark: pthread_once ns < Lower Is Better Glibc Benchmarks 2.37 Benchmark: ffsll ns < Lower Is Better Glibc Benchmarks 2.37 Benchmark: tanh ns < Lower Is Better Glibc Benchmarks 2.37 Benchmark: sqrt ns < Lower Is Better Glibc Benchmarks 2.37 Benchmark: sin ns < Lower Is Better Glibc Benchmarks 2.37 Benchmark: ffs ns < Lower Is Better Glibc Benchmarks 2.37 Benchmark: cos ns < Lower Is Better Sockperf 3.7 Test: Latency Under Load MB/s > Higher Is Better MBW 2018-09-08 Test: Memory Copy, Fixed Block Size - Array Size: 8192 MiB MiB/s > Higher Is Better MBW 2018-09-08 Test: Memory Copy, Fixed Block Size - Array Size: 4096 MiB MiB/s > Higher Is Better MBW 2018-09-08 Test: Memory Copy - Array Size: 8192 MiB MiB/s > Higher Is Better MBW 2018-09-08 Test: Memory Copy - Array Size: 4096 MiB MiB/s > Higher Is Better Stream 2013-01-17 Type: Add MB/s > Higher Is Better RPi5 8GB Raspbian CPUFreq-Performance OfficialActiveCooler PSU-27W Run02 . 5339.7 | Stream 2013-01-17 Type: Copy MB/s > Higher Is Better RPi5 8GB Raspbian CPUFreq-Performance OfficialActiveCooler PSU-27W Run02 . 6011.0 | clpeak 1.1.2 OpenCL Test: Transfer Bandwidth enqueueWriteBuffer clpeak 1.1.2 OpenCL Test: Transfer Bandwidth enqueueReadBuffer clpeak 1.1.2 OpenCL Test: Single-Precision Compute clpeak 1.1.2 OpenCL Test: Double-Precision Compute clpeak 1.1.2 OpenCL Test: Global Memory Bandwidth clpeak 1.1.2 OpenCL Test: Integer 24-bit Compute clpeak 1.1.2 OpenCL Test: Integer Compute clpeak 1.1.2 OpenCL Test: Kernel Latency VkResample 1.0 Upscale: 2x - Precision: Single ms < Lower Is Better VkResample 1.0 Upscale: 2x - Precision: Double ms < Lower Is Better Betsy GPU Compressor 1.1 Beta Codec: ETC2 RGB - Quality: Highest Seconds < Lower Is Better Betsy GPU Compressor 1.1 Beta Codec: ETC1 - Quality: Highest Seconds < Lower Is Better cl-mem 2017-01-13 Benchmark: Write cl-mem 2017-01-13 Benchmark: Read cl-mem 2017-01-13 Benchmark: Copy Libplacebo 5.229.1 FPS > Higher Is Better SHOC Scalable HeterOgeneous Computing 2020-04-17 Target: OpenCL - Benchmark: Texture Read Bandwidth SHOC Scalable HeterOgeneous Computing 2020-04-17 Target: OpenCL - Benchmark: Bus Speed Readback SHOC Scalable HeterOgeneous Computing 2020-04-17 Target: OpenCL - Benchmark: Bus Speed Download SHOC Scalable HeterOgeneous Computing 2020-04-17 Target: OpenCL - Benchmark: Max SP Flops SHOC Scalable HeterOgeneous Computing 2020-04-17 Target: OpenCL - Benchmark: GEMM SGEMM_N SHOC Scalable HeterOgeneous Computing 2020-04-17 Target: OpenCL - Benchmark: Reduction SHOC Scalable HeterOgeneous Computing 2020-04-17 Target: OpenCL - Benchmark: MD5 Hash SHOC Scalable HeterOgeneous Computing 2020-04-17 Target: OpenCL - Benchmark: FFT SP SHOC Scalable HeterOgeneous Computing 2020-04-17 Target: OpenCL - Benchmark: Triad SHOC Scalable HeterOgeneous Computing 2020-04-17 Target: OpenCL - Benchmark: S3D VkFFT 1.2.31 Test: FFT + iFFT C2C 1D batched in single precision, no reshuffling Benchmark Score > Higher Is Better VkFFT 1.2.31 Test: FFT + iFFT C2C Bluestein benchmark in double precision Benchmark Score > Higher Is Better VkFFT 1.2.31 Test: FFT + iFFT C2C multidimensional in single precision Benchmark Score > Higher Is Better VkFFT 1.2.31 Test: FFT + iFFT C2C 1D batched in single precision Benchmark Score > Higher Is Better VkFFT 1.2.31 Test: FFT + iFFT C2C 1D batched in double precision Benchmark Score > Higher Is Better VkFFT 1.2.31 Test: FFT + iFFT C2C Bluestein in single precision Benchmark Score > Higher Is Better VkFFT 1.2.31 Test: FFT + iFFT C2C 1D batched in half precision Benchmark Score > Higher Is Better VkFFT 1.2.31 Test: FFT + iFFT R2C / C2R Benchmark Score > Higher Is Better Compile Bench 0.6 Test: Read Compiled Tree MB/s > Higher Is Better Compile Bench 0.6 Test: Initial Create MB/s > Higher Is Better Compile Bench 0.6 Test: Compile MB/s > Higher Is Better IOzone 3.465 8GB Write Performance MB/s > Higher Is Better IOR 3.3.0 Block Size: 1024MB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory MB/s > Higher Is Better IOR 3.3.0 Block Size: 512MB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory MB/s > Higher Is Better IOR 3.3.0 Block Size: 256MB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory MB/s > Higher Is Better IOR 3.3.0 Block Size: 64MB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory MB/s > Higher Is Better IOR 3.3.0 Block Size: 32MB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory MB/s > Higher Is Better IOR 3.3.0 Block Size: 16MB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory MB/s > Higher Is Better IOR 3.3.0 Block Size: 8MB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory MB/s > Higher Is Better IOR 3.3.0 Block Size: 4MB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory MB/s > Higher Is Better IOR 3.3.0 Block Size: 2MB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory MB/s > Higher Is Better BlogBench 1.1 Test: Read Final Score > Higher Is Better RPi5 8GB Raspbian CPUFreq-Performance OfficialActiveCooler PSU-27W Run02 . 382351 | FS-Mark 3.3 Test: 1000 Files, 1MB Size, No Sync/FSync Files/s > Higher Is Better RPi5 8GB Raspbian CPUFreq-Performance OfficialActiveCooler PSU-27W Run02 . 1010.5 | FS-Mark 3.3 Test: 4000 Files, 32 Sub Dirs, 1MB Size Files/s > Higher Is Better RPi5 8GB Raspbian CPUFreq-Performance OfficialActiveCooler PSU-27W Run02 . 137.1 | FS-Mark 3.3 Test: 5000 Files, 1MB Size, 4 Threads Files/s > Higher Is Better RPi5 8GB Raspbian CPUFreq-Performance OfficialActiveCooler PSU-27W Run02 . 114.4 | FS-Mark 3.3 Test: 1000 Files, 1MB Size Files/s > Higher Is Better RPi5 8GB Raspbian CPUFreq-Performance OfficialActiveCooler PSU-27W Run02 . 151.0 | Flexible IO Tester 3.36 Type: Sequential Write - IO Engine: Linux AIO - Buffered: No - Direct: Yes - Block Size: 4KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory Flexible IO Tester 3.36 Type: Sequential Write - IO Engine: Linux AIO - Buffered: No - Direct: Yes - Block Size: 2MB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory Flexible IO Tester 3.36 Type: Sequential Read - IO Engine: Linux AIO - Buffered: No - Direct: Yes - Block Size: 4KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory Flexible IO Tester 3.36 Type: Sequential Read - IO Engine: Linux AIO - Buffered: No - Direct: Yes - Block Size: 2MB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory Flexible IO Tester 3.36 Type: Random Write - IO Engine: Linux AIO - Buffered: No - Direct: Yes - Block Size: 4KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory Flexible IO Tester 3.36 Type: Random Write - IO Engine: Linux AIO - Buffered: No - Direct: Yes - Block Size: 2MB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory Flexible IO Tester 3.36 Type: Random Read - IO Engine: Linux AIO - Buffered: No - Direct: Yes - Block Size: 4KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory Flexible IO Tester 3.36 Type: Random Read - IO Engine: Linux AIO - Buffered: No - Direct: Yes - Block Size: 2MB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory LevelDB 1.23 Benchmark: Sequential Fill Microseconds Per Op < Lower Is Better LevelDB 1.23 Benchmark: Random Delete Microseconds Per Op < Lower Is Better LevelDB 1.23 Benchmark: Seek Random Microseconds Per Op < Lower Is Better LevelDB 1.23 Benchmark: Random Read Microseconds Per Op < Lower Is Better LevelDB 1.23 Benchmark: Random Fill Microseconds Per Op < Lower Is Better LevelDB 1.23 Benchmark: Overwrite Microseconds Per Op < Lower Is Better LevelDB 1.23 Benchmark: Fill Sync Microseconds Per Op < Lower Is Better LevelDB 1.23 Benchmark: Hot Read Microseconds Per Op < Lower Is Better